hr breakfast forum - 24 september 2013

22
Welcome to Burton HR Professionals HR Breakfast Forum - 24 th September 2013 Helen Mason Richard Shakespeare Samantha Cotter

Upload: oliver-buckle

Post on 27-May-2015

69 views

Category:

Business


1 download

DESCRIPTION

HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013 Guest Speakers: Helen Mason, Richard Shakespeare & Samantha Cotter

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

Welcome to Burton HR Professionals

HR Breakfast Forum - 24th September 2013

Helen MasonRichard Shakespeare

Samantha Cotter

Page 2: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

Employment rights: All change! Protected Conversations

Fees New Rules

Cap on Compensation “Shareholder” employees

ACAS early Conciliation

Helen Mason

Page 3: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

Protected Conversations• 29 July 2013• Inadmissible in ET proceedings• Exclusions: – discrimination– automatically unfair dismissal– “improper behaviour”

• ACAS Code• right to be accompanied• 10 days to consider

Page 4: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

Fees

• 29 July 2013• Type of claim (A and B)• Types of Hearing• Remission• Judicial review

Page 5: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

New Rules

• 29 July 2013• Initial paper sift• Preliminary hearings• Costs

Page 6: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

Cap on Compensation

• Dismissals after 29 July 2013• Cap of the lower of 52 weeks pa or £74,200

Page 7: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

Shareholder employees

• 1 September 2013• £2000 minimum share value• Loss of certain statutory rights

Page 8: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

ACAS early Conciliation

• April 2014• Employee must contact ACAS before making an ET claim• Additional month to resolve dispute

Page 9: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

Reasonable AdjustmentsMyth and Reality

Richard Shakespeare

Page 10: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

Understanding Reasonable Adjustments • The Equality Act came into force on October 1st 2010

• Employers are required to make a “reasonable adjustment” to support an employee

• You only have to make adjustments where you are aware – or should reasonably be aware – that a worker has a disability

• The employer's duty to make reasonable adjustments only arises where a provision, criterion or practice puts a disabled person at a substantial disadvantage when compared with a non-disabled person

Page 11: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

Understanding Reasonable Adjustments

• An organisation with lots of money would be more likely to have to make a reasonable adjustment than one with fewer resources.

• Failure to make a reasonable adjustment is disability discrimination for which an employer may be liable to pay an unlimited amount of compensation

• Remember - It costs nothing to treat someone fairly and with dignity

Page 12: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

Considering Reasonable Adjustments

Best Practice:

Ensure that all employees know who to approach for advice/support - Speak to a line manager or to someone in

your occupational health team, human resources or employee engagement team.

Page 13: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

A few basics to remember

Finding a reasonable adjustment should be a collaboration between the employer and employee

Should be a creative process – use your knowledge of the role and the employees knowledge about how the disability impacts the individual

Page 14: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

Case Study: Age Discrimination

Samantha Cotter

The factsThe law

The decisionWhat should the employer have done?

Page 15: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

The Facts

• Waitress B and C both employed by Company A• B is aged 17 and has 9 months service• Waitress C is aged 54 and has 9 years service• B and C have a fight at work • Full investigation• Disciplinary hearings

Page 16: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

The Facts

• Equally to blame• Waitress B: dismissed for gross misconduct• Waitress C: Final written warning• B claims age discrimination

Page 17: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

The Law (Equality Act 2010) • S19(1): A discriminates against B if A applies to B a provision criterion or practice (PCP) which is discriminatory in relation to a relevant protected characteristic of B’s.

• S19(2): PCP is discriminatory if: (a) A applies PCP to persons with whom B does not share the characteristic; (b) it puts persons with whom B shares the characteristic at a particular disadvantage c/f with persons with whom B does not share it; (c) it puts, or would put, B at that disadvantage; and (d) A cannot show it to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

• s23: there must be no material difference between the circumstances relating to each case.

Page 18: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

The Tribunal’s Decision

• Indirect age discrimination: • Discriminatory PCP • Employer unable to justify i.e. show that PCP was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim• Remedy settled “out of court”

Page 19: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

What should the employer have done?

• Treated B and C the same regardless of length of service

• At ET hearing, shown reasons to justify difference in treatment.

Page 20: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

Questions and Comments

Page 21: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

Burton HR Professionals Online

LinkedINEvents

Legal UpdatesDiscussions

Expert KnowledgePolls

Feedback

Page 22: HR Breakfast Forum - 24 September 2013

Thank you

Helen MasonConsultant with Else

Solicitors LLP

07778 [email protected]

Richard ShakespeareRichard Shakespeare Disability Consultants

07891 [email protected]

Samantha CotterElse Solicitors LLP

07970 [email protected]