hydro microscreen™ vs primary settling tanks

16
Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks Municipal Wastewater

Upload: hydro-international

Post on 18-Feb-2017

278 views

Category:

Business


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

Municipal Wastewater

Page 2: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

Primary treatment

Primary settling tanks are widely used to remove wastewater TSS and BOD.

TSS: Total Suspended Solids

BOD: Biological Oxygen Demand

Page 3: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

Primary treatment

Larger, more slowly biodegradable solids settle and are removed as sludge.

Fine and dissolved solids remain in suspension and are contained in the effluent.

Page 4: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

Normally, primary settling tanks are designed to provide 1.5–2.5 hours of detention.

But performance is adversely affected by short circuiting, hydraulic stability, temperature and wind.

Primary treatment

Page 5: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

Typical performance

Primary settling tanks typically achieve:

Up to 70% TSS removal

Up to 40% BOD removal

Up to 12% total solids sludge

Page 6: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

A different approach

But what if you could get equivalent or better performance in a smaller, more efficient unit?

Page 7: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

The Hydro MicroScreen™

The Hydro MicroScreen™is a rotating belt screening system.

It uses a physical barrier to separate liquids and solids.

Page 8: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

The Hydro MicroScreen™

This means that it removes TSS, BOD and FOG faster, and in a smaller footprint, than primary settling.

Page 9: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

The Hydro MicroScreen™

It’s typically half the cost, 90% smaller and uses up to 50% less power than conventional primary treatment.

Page 10: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

It removes more waste.

TSS

Up to

80%Up to

70%

BOD FOG0%

Up to

40%

Up to

60%Up to

40%

Versus primary settling

Primary settling

Hydro MicroScreen

Page 11: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

It takes up less space.

Typically

90%smaller

Versus primary settling

Primary settling

Hydro MicroScreen

Page 12: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

It uses less power.

At least

10 hpUp to

7 hp

Versus primary settling

Primary settling

Hydro MicroScreen

Page 13: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

It produces drier sludge.

Up to

12%total solids

Versus primary settling

Primary settlingUp to

50%total solids

(with dewatering components)

Hydro MicroScreen

Page 14: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

Versus primary settling

Wastewater treatment plants are already using it to cut costs and improve efficiency.

In Fontana, CA one MicroScreen and modular filter eliminated the need for:

Four primary clarifiersTwo secondary clarifiersTwo trickling filtersOne grit channel

Page 15: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

Summary

Compared with conventional primary treatment, Hydro MicroScreen™ can help you:

Reduce energy costs. Cut solids handling.Increase operating efficiency.

Page 16: Hydro MicroScreen™ vs Primary Settling Tanks

Find out more

Visit the Hydro MicroScreen™ product page

Read the case study

Get the technical brochure

Visit product page

Read case study

Get tech brochure