identification and expression of invertase genes in …
TRANSCRIPT
1
IDENTIFICATION AND EXPRESSION OF INVERTASE GENES IN POPULUS
By
PHILIP N. BOCOCK
A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
2007
2
© 2007 Philip N Bocock
3
To my wife, Traci
4
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. John Davis, who has helped to deepen my knowledge
of molecular biology and has taught me how to ask questions. Without his endless help, I would
not be here. I would also like to acknowledge my committee members: Drs. Curt Hannah, Karen
Koch, Tim Martin and Gary Peter for their valuable advice throughout this undertaking. Also, I
would especially like to thank Drs. Li-Fen Huang and Karen Koch whose collaboration have
made this project possible. I am also grateful to other faculty, staff, and graduate students for
their help and encouragement, especially Alison Morse, Kathy Smith, Chris Dervinis, Mike
Reed, Gogce Kayihan, Gustavo Ramirez, Rocio Diaz, John Mayfield and Diego Fajardo.
Without the support of my family this endeavor would have never been accomplished. I
must especially thank my wife, Traci, and our two children, Isaiah and Edward, for their love,
encouragement and support that have gotten me through this education.
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS page
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4
LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................................8
LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................9
ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................11
CHAPTER
1 INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW ..............................................................13
Poplar as a Model ...................................................................................................................13 Carbon Transport and Utilization ...........................................................................................13 Sucrose....................................................................................................................................14 Sucrose Cleaving Enzymes.....................................................................................................14 Acid Invertase.........................................................................................................................15
Proteinaceous Inhibitors of Acid Invertase .....................................................................16 Structure of Acid Invertases ............................................................................................18
Neutral/Alkaline Invertase (Cytosolic Invertase) ...................................................................19 Regulation of Invertase:..........................................................................................................19
Sugars ..............................................................................................................................19 Hormones ........................................................................................................................20 Wounding and Pathogens ................................................................................................20 Environmental Stimuli.....................................................................................................21
Invertase Investigations in Transgenic Plants.........................................................................22 Research Objectives................................................................................................................23
2 EVOLUTION AND DIVERSITY OF INVERTASE GENES IN Populus trichocarpa .......27
Introduction.............................................................................................................................27 Materials and Methods ...........................................................................................................29
Plant Material ..................................................................................................................29 BLAST Searches and DNA Annotation..........................................................................30 Construction of Sequence Similarity Trees.....................................................................30 Identification of Gene Duplication..................................................................................30 Isolation of RNA and RT-PCR Assay.............................................................................31 Quantitative RT-PCR ......................................................................................................31 Genomic DNA Isolation..................................................................................................32 Microarray Design and Analysis .....................................................................................32
Results.....................................................................................................................................33 Identification of Poplar Invertase Genes .........................................................................33 Structure of the Poplar Invertase Genes ..........................................................................34 Expression of the Poplar Invertase Gene Family ............................................................35
6
Evolutionary Development of the Poplar Invertase Family ............................................35 Putative Evidence for Origins of PtVIN1 ........................................................................39
Discussion...............................................................................................................................39
3 RECIPROCAL SUGAR REGULATION IS CONSERVED AMONG VACUOLAR INVERTASAES OF POPLAR, ARABIDOPSIS, MAIZE AND RICE .................................56
Introduction.............................................................................................................................56 Materials and Methods ...........................................................................................................58
Plant Material ..................................................................................................................58 Sequence Alignments and Similarity Trees ....................................................................59 RNA Extraction ...............................................................................................................59 Quantitative RT-PCR in Poplar and Pine........................................................................59 Quantitative RT-PCR in Arabidopsis ..............................................................................60 Sugar Treatments for Poplar, Arabidopsis, Pine and Rice ..............................................61 Light-Dark Treatments for Poplar, Pine and Arabidopsis...............................................61
Results.....................................................................................................................................62 Predicting Gene Orthology Using Protein Sequence Similarity .....................................62 A Chromosome Duplication Event is Responsible for the Two Member VIN Family
in Poplar and Arabidopsis ............................................................................................64 Sugar Response Demonstrates Conservation of Gene Function in VINs ........................65 Reciprocal Response in Light..........................................................................................66
Discussion...............................................................................................................................67
4 OVEREXPRESSION OF YEAST INVERTASE IN POPLAR ............................................76
Introduction.............................................................................................................................76 Materials and Methods ...........................................................................................................78
Plant Material, Transgenesis, and Growth Conditions ....................................................78 Vector Construction.........................................................................................................78 Construction of Similarity Trees .....................................................................................79 Isolation of RNA, Generation of cDNA and Real-Time PCR Assay..............................79 Genomic DNA Isolation and PCR Amplification ...........................................................80 Metabolic Profiling: Extraction, Separation and Identification ......................................81 Construction and Experimental Design of Grafts ...........................................................81 Measurement of Photosynthesis and Respiration............................................................82 Protein Extraction............................................................................................................83 Total Invertase Activity Assay ........................................................................................84 Detection of Invertase Activity in Native Polyacrylamide Gels .....................................84 Sugar and Starch Determination......................................................................................84
Results and Discussion ...........................................................................................................85 Construction of Overexpressing Yeast Invertase Vectors...............................................85 Expression of SUC2 in Poplar.........................................................................................86 Yeast Invertase Active in Cytosol ...................................................................................87 Metabolic Profiling Reveals Alterations in CwSUC2 and VacSUC2 Transgenic
Lines.............................................................................................................................88
7
Metabolic Profiling Reveals Alterations in Sugar Accumulation in CytSUC2 Transgenic Lines..........................................................................................................89
Whole-Plant Phenotypes are not Apparent......................................................................90 Concluding Remarks .......................................................................................................90
5 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................102
APPENDIX
A REPRESSION OF INVERTASE IN POPULUS .................................................................106
Introduction...........................................................................................................................106 Materials and Methods .........................................................................................................107
Plant Material, Transgenesis, and Growth Conditions ..................................................107 Vector Construction.......................................................................................................107 Genomic DNA Isolation and PCR Amplification .........................................................108
Results...................................................................................................................................109 Construction of RNAi Vector........................................................................................109 Insertion of Target Gene Sequence ...............................................................................109 Further Work .................................................................................................................110
B REGULATION OF INVERTASE: A"SUITE" OF TRANSCRIPTIONAL AND POST-TRANSCRIPTIONAL MECHANISMS..............................................................................115
Abstract.................................................................................................................................115 Introduction...........................................................................................................................116 Compartmentalization of Vacuolar Invertases in Precursor Protease Vesicles (PPV).........117 Wall-Associated Kinase (WAK) ..........................................................................................119 Other Kinases Affecting Invertases ......................................................................................120 Differential Sugar Regulation of Invertases .........................................................................121 RNA Turn Over and DST.....................................................................................................124 Invertase Inhibitors ...............................................................................................................125 Summary...............................................................................................................................127 Acknowledgements...............................................................................................................128
LIST OF REFERENCES.............................................................................................................131
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .......................................................................................................149
8
LIST OF TABLES
Table page 2-1 Nomenclature and chromosomal location of 24 poplar invertase genes ...............................44
2-2 Primers used in RT-qPCR and RT-PCR................................................................................49
3-1 Percent similarity of predicted VINs from poplar, Arabidopsis, rice and maize ..................71
4-1 Metabolites altered in CwSUC2 and VacSUC2 overexpressing plants .................................99
4-2 Metabolites altered in CytSUC2 overexpressing plants ......................................................100
4-3 Summary of phenotypic experiments performed. ...............................................................101
A-1 Primer sequences used for ~200 bp target sequence cloning. ............................................113
A-2 Summary of RNAi constructs made ...................................................................................114
9
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure page 1-1 Sucrose synthesis, transport and metabolism in source and sink cells..................................24
1-2 Protein inhibitors of cell wall invertases share strong sequence similarity with inhibitors of pectin methylesterase ....................................................................................25
1-3 Representation of cell wall and vacuolar isoforms of carrot invertase..................................26
2-1 Exon-intron structures of predicted invertase genes..............................................................45
2-2 Invertase amino acid similarity trees .....................................................................................46
2-3 Expression of poplar invertase genes ....................................................................................47
2-4 Evolutionary development of the poplar acid invertase family.............................................48
2-5 Amino acid alignment of poplar invertases...........................................................................55
3-1 Protein similarity tree of VINs ..............................................................................................72
3-2 Phylogenetic representation of relevant plant species...........................................................73
3-3 Conservation of specific VIN isoform transcript repression under sugar treatments across taxa..........................................................................................................................74
3-4 Conservation of reciprocal regulation of VIN transcript under dark and light treatments across taxa..........................................................................................................................75
4-1 Schematic representation of yeast invertase overexpressing constructs targeted to the cytosol, cell wall and vacuole ............................................................................................93
4-2 S. cerevisiae SUC2 in relationship to other plant invertases.................................................95
4-3 Relative expression of double 35S driven SUC2 in root, stem and leaf................................96
4-4 Relative expression of SUC2 transcript in overexpressing transgenic events in leaf............97
4-5 CytSUC2 transgenic plants display increased invertase activity due to presence of transgene ............................................................................................................................98
A-1 Schematic representation of pCAPT vector used for RNAi silencing ...............................111
A-2 Schematic representation of RNAi directed constructs ......................................................112
B-1 Recent additions to mechanisms controlling invertases .....................................................129
10
B-2 Protein inhibitors of cell wall invertases share strong sequence similarity with inhibitors of pectin methylesterase ..................................................................................130
11
Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
IDENTIFICATION AND EXPRESSION OF INVERTASE GENES IN POPULUS
By
Philip N. Bocock
December 2007
Chair: John M. Davis Major: Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology
Invertase (EC 3.2.1.26) plays a key role in carbon utilization as it catalyzes the irreversible
hydrolysis of sucrose into glucose and fructose. These sugars can act as both metabolic fuel and
as signaling compounds directly affecting resource allocation in the plant and indirectly
influencing the expression of genes responsive to shifts in hexose and sucrose availability. The
invertase family in plants is composed of two sub-families thought to have distinct evolutionary
origins and can be distinguished by their pH optima for activity: acid invertases and
neutral/alkaline invertases. The acid invertases apparently originated in eubacteria and are
targeted to the cell wall and vacuole, while neutral/alkaline invertases apparently originated in
cyanobacteria and function in the cytosol. The recently sequenced genome of Populus
trichocharpa (Torr. & Gray) allowed us to identify the genes encoding invertase in this woody
perennial. Here we describe the identification of eight acid invertase genes; three of which
belong to the vacuolar targeted group (PtVIN1-3), and five of which belong to the cell wall
targeted group (PtCIN1-5). Similarly, we report the identification of 16 neutral/alkaline invertase
genes (PtNIN1-16). Expression analyses using whole genome microarrays and RT-PCR reveal
evidence for expression of all invertase family members. An examination of the microsyntenic
regions surrounding the poplar invertase genes reveals extensive colinearity with Arabidopsis
12
invertases. We also find evidence for expression of a novel intronless vacuolar invertase
(PtVIN1), which apparently arose from a processed PtVIN2 transcript that re-inserted into the
genome. To our knowledge, this is the first intronless invertase found in plants. The response of
two poplar vacuolar invertases (PtVIN2 and -3) to exogenous sugar treatments was examined and
compared to those of the Arabidopsis, maize and rice vacuolar invertase orthologs. We found
that PtVIN2 and -3 exhibit a reciprocal response to both light and exogenous sugar treatments
whereby PtVIN2 expression is repressed under both light and high sugar conditions while
PtVIN3 is induced under the same conditions. This reciprocal response has been previously
documented in other plant systems including Arabidopsis, maize and rice. An examination of the
microsyntenic chromosomal regions containing vacuolar invertase reveals extensive colinearity
between Arabidopsis and poplar, but does not include rice and maize. The conserved colinear
structure of the chromosomal segments containing the vacuolar invertases in Arabidopsis and
poplar, coupled with the conserved reciprocal responses of these vacuolar invertases to sugar in
Arabidopsis, poplar, maize and rice, has led to the hypothesis that the reciprocal nature of this
sugar response arose in an ancient genome duplication event that occurred prior to the monocot
and eudicot divergence on the evolutionary tree. To better understand the role of invertase in
sucrose export and sink development, yeast invertase (SUC2) was ectopically expressed in a
Populus tremula x P. alba hybrid. Despite the efficacy of this transgenic approach in other plant
systems resulting in whole-plant shifts in carbon allocation and dramatic changes in sugar
accumulation; transgenic poplars showed no whole-plant carbon allocation shifts. Metabolic
analyses revealed that while most of the transgenic poplar lines did not exhibit the expected
alterations in sugar accumulation, intermediates in the glyoxylate and the tricarboxylic acid
cycles did fluctuate relative to the non-transgenic controls.
13
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW
Current population growth combined with increasing development and urbanization
worldwide is putting strain on the terrestrial ecosystem’s main carbon sink, forests. One way to
combat this increasing demand of decreasing forest resources is to manipulate carbon
sequestration patterns in trees in order to direct carbon allocation into the most desirable organs
such as stems, to meet industrial demands, or roots to help increase long term carbon storage
capacity in the soil. Unfortunately, these mechanisms are not well understood. Carbon
sequestration is not part of a single pathway, but a culmination of many pathways dealing with
carbon absorption through photosynthesis, carbon loss through respiration, carbon transport
through the vascular system, carbon partitioning within a cell, and carbon allocation into long-
term storage compounds such as lignin.
Poplar as a Model
The perennial tree, poplar, has emerged as a model species for physiology and genetics
research. Poplar is amenable to transformation, can be clonally propagated and has a haploid
genome size of 480 million base pairs which is roughly four times larger than Arabidopsis, has
been sequenced and encodes approximately 45,000 genes (Bradshaw and Stettler, 1995;
Bradshaw et al., 2000; Tuskan et al., 2006). Poplar also is an economically important tree on the
global market with interest from industry on its improvement.
Carbon Transport and Utilization
Plants utilize carbon by precisely partitioning the reduced carbon obtained through
photosynthesis into different locations within the cell and subsequently allocating it throughout
the plant (Figure 1-1). Photosynthesis reduces carbon dioxide into sugars that can be ushered into
glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle for the production of ATP and NADH, or the sugars
14
can be used as a source of carbon for the synthesis of primary and secondary metabolites
essential for the growth and development of the plant. Alternatively, these sugars can be
converted into starches, triacyl glycerides or polypeptides for long-term storage (Sturm, 1999).
These same sugars are also used to synthesize sucrose, the primary sugar used for carbon
transport in higher plants. Sucrose can be transiently stored in the vacuole and then exported to
the non-photosynthesizing sink tissues via the phloem. In source cells, sucrose is synthesized in
the cytosol, stored for later use in the vacuole, travels to neighboring cells through
plasmodesmata, and eventually enters the phloem via plasmodesmata or from the surrounding
apoplast (Turgeon and Hepler, 1989; Grusak et al., 1996).
Sucrose
Sucrose and its glucose and fructose cleavage products are primary molecules in
carbohydrate translocation, sugar signaling, and osmotic maintenance. Sucrose is a non-reducing
disaccharide composed of an α1-β2 linked glucose and fructose. The cleavage of a single sucrose
molecule in solution results in two molecules of hexoses thereby doubling the osmotic potential
of the solution. By compartmentalizing sucrose and/or the hexoses in various cellular
compartments, osmotic gradients are realized, providing the basis for short-distance transport
from cell to cell, as well as long-distance transport from organ to organ via the phloem as first
proposed by Münch (1930). Sucrose and its component hexoses also provide sugar signals that
trigger numerous biological pathways playing roles in cell division, expansion, differentiation
and maturation (Koch, 2004).
Sucrose Cleaving Enzymes
Plants possess two enzymes that have the capability of cleaving sucrose: sucrose synthase
(EC 2.4.1.13) and invertase (EC 3.2.1.26). Sucrose synthase is a glycosyl transferase catalyzing a
reversible reaction converting sucrose into UDP-glucose and fructose in the presence of UDP.
15
Invertase, in contrast, hydrolyzes sucrose into glucose and fructose in an irreversible reaction.
The free energy of these two reactions are –4.18 KJ and –27.6 KJ, respectively (Ap Rees, 1984).
The invertase family can be grouped according to two properties: cellular location and pH
optima for activity (Winter and Huber, 2000). The first group, known as the acid invertases, has
a pH optimum of between 4.5 and 5.0 and consists of an insoluble, extracellular, cell wall-bound
form and a soluble form located in the lumen of the vacuole (Haouazine-Takvorian et al., 1997;
Sherson et al., 2003). The second group, known as the neutral/alkaline invertases, has a pH
optimum of about 7.0-7.8. The neutral/alkaline invertases are entirely soluble and appear to be
located in the cytosol (Chen and Black, 1992; Van den Ende and Van Laere, 1995).
Acid Invertase
Acid invertases are β-fructofuranosidases that hydrolyze not only sucrose, but also other β-
fructose containing oligosaccharides such as raffinose and stachyose. The acid invertase Km for
sucrose is in the low mM range and activity can be inhibited by Tris buffer, heavy metal ions
such as Hg2+ and Ag2+, as well as other divalent cations such as Mg2+, Ca2+, and Zn2+ (Krausgrill
et al., 1996; Tymowska-Lalanne and Kreis, 1998b).
Acid invertases have also been shown in a variety of species to be glycosylated. Some
examples are in radish (Faye and Ghorbel, 1983), maize (Doehlert and Felker, 1987), carrot
(Lauriere et al., 1988; Stommel and Simon, 1990; Unger et al., 1992), and tobacco (Weil and
Rausch, 1990). In yeast, there are two isoforms of acid invertase that are encoded by a single
gene, but arise from differential splicing of exons. One isoform is glycosylated and targeted to
the extracellular space, while the other is non-glycosylated and is located in the cytosol. This
glycosylation seems to have no effect on the enzymatic properties of acid invertase (Faye et al.,
1981), but is instead required for its transport to the secretory pathway where it is directed to the
16
apoplastic and vacuolar spaces (Carlson and Botstein, 1982; Perlman et al., 1982; Bergh et al.,
1987). In contrast to yeast, the invertase isoforms in plants are encoded by different genes.
Invertase can range in molecular mass from a 48 kD monomeric form found in radish
(Faye et al., 1981) to a 450 kD oligomeric form found in lily pollen (Singh and Knox, 1984),
however, most molecular masses are around 60 kD. Analyses of some invertases under
denaturing conditions on SDS gels show the presence of proteolytic fragments. A 70 kD
vacuolar invertase monomer from mung bean hypocotyls was processed into a 30 kD N-terminal
fragment and a 38 kD C-terminal fragment (Arai et al., 1991). In carrot, a 68 kD monomer of
vacuolar invertase was processed into an N-terminal fragment of 43 kD and a C-terminal
fragment of 25 kD (Unger et al., 1992; Unger et al., 1994). The role of this fragmentation is
unknown, but under native conditions these fragments are tightly associated.
Proteinaceous Inhibitors of Acid Invertase
Cell wall and vacuolar invertase activity can be regulated by a family of proteinaceous
inhibitors known as cell wall inhibitor of fructosidase (CIF) and vacuolar inhibitor of
fructosidase (VIF), or collectively as C/VIF (Rausch and Greiner, 2004). Although CIF are cell
wall invertase inhibitors, they are broadly active against both cell wall and vacuolar invertases.
In contrast, VIF inhibition is specific to vacuolar invertases. Neither of the inhibitors affect
fungal invertases indicating a minimal role for these interactions in pathogen defense (Greiner et
al., 1998; Greiner et al., 1999; Link et al., 2004). The C/VIF related protein family is not highly
conserved, and in Arabidopsis, sequence identities range from roughly 20 % to 40 % for
approximately 14 family members (Rausch and Greiner, 2004). The C/VIF related protein family
also contains pectin methylesterase inhibitors (PMEI). PMEI are indistinguishable from the
C/VIF by sequence alone and retain nearly identical structures to the C/VIF (Giovane et al.,
2004; Hothorn et al., 2004a; Hothorn et al., 2004b; Di Matteo et al., 2005).
17
Important implications arise from the capacity of these related proteinaceous inhibitors to
distinguish between their targets. Arabidopsis has only eight putative acid invertases (six cell
wall and two vacuolar), but more than 60 pectin methylesterase (PME)-related genes based on
sequence similarity (Micheli, 2001; Sherson et al., 2003; Rausch and Greiner, 2004; De Coninck
et al., 2005). X-ray crystollagraphy has revealed that CIF is conformationally stable over a broad
pH and temperature range, however, the invertase/inhibitor complex is only stable at an acidic
pH. This indicates that binding is determined not by conformational changes, but rather by pH-
induced changes at the interface of the invertase/inhibitor complex (Hothorn et al., 2004a;
Hothorn and Scheffzek, 2006). In contrast, the highly similar structure of the PMEI was found to
undergo large structural rearrangements (Figure 1-2) under these same conditions suggesting
PMEI uses a different mode of binding than does the CIF (Hothorn et al., 2004b). PMEI contains
a flexible α-hairpin that is important both in dimer formation and in binding of PME (Hothorn et
al., 2004b). Chimeral domain swap experiments of the α-hairpin domain between PMEI and CIF
indicate that this domain of PMEI is necessary and sufficient for activity against PME; however,
the corresponding α-hairpin in NtCIF is not sufficient for invertase inhibition (Hothorn et al.,
2004b). The approximately 28 amino acid residues encoding this α-hairpin may be key in
distinguishing these two classes of inhibitors (Hothorn et al., 2004b).
Analysis of PMEI and CIF crystal structures not only clarifies interactions between these
inhibitors and their targets, but also aids our understanding of how distinct functions can arise for
proteins sharing very similar structures and ancestry. It is worth noting, however, that the
crystallographic analyses were performed on the cell wall invertase inhibitor and thus do not
explain the apparently narrower substrate specificity of the vacuolar invertase inhibitor. These
data indicate that the VIF may use a different mode of action than the CIF. It is also of interest
18
that two proteins in Arabidopsis previously annotated based on sequence similarity as cell wall
invertases (AtcwINV3&6), may actually be fructan exohydrolases (FEH). FEH protein
sequences are nearly identical to those of demonstrated acid invertase family members, yet the
recombinant enzymes are completely inactive against sucrose (De Coninck et al., 2005). It has
yet to be determined if the C/VIF family can distinguish between FEH and the known invertase
and PME substrates. Given the level of sequence diversity within the inhibitor family it seems
likely that biochemical and structural analyses will be required to resolve these questions.
Structure of Acid Invertases
Acid invertases are initially synthesized as pre-proteins containing a leader sequence that is
cleaved upon entry into the secretory pathway, the mature peptide sequence, and in the case of
the vacuolar invertases, a short C-terminal extension (Figure 1-3). The leader sequence consists
of two parts: a signal peptide and an N-terminal extension of unknown function, but is thought to
play a role in protein folding, targeting, or activity (Sturm, 1999). The signal peptide is required
for entry into the endoplasmic reticulum and from there to the apoplast (Blobel, 1980) or to the
vacuole if the required vacuolar targeting domain is present (Neuhaus and Rogers, 1998). The
vacuolar targeting domain is thought to be located either in the C-terminal extension or in the N-
terminal propeptide which is longer in vacuolar invertases than in cell wall invertases.
Plant acid invertases have two common features in their sequences. Towards the N-teminal
end of the protein is the β-fructosidase domain, NDPN, which is usually encoded by a mini-exon
of only 9 nucleotides. Towards the C-terminal end of the protein is another conserved sequence
consisting of the amino acids WECXDF. In potato, Bournay (1996) observed that under cold
stress, the mini-exon of the potato pCD111 cell wall invertase encoding the NDPN domain is
skipped in an alternative splicing event.
19
Neutral/Alkaline Invertase (Cytosolic Invertase)
Neutral/alkaline invertases are located in the cytosol and have a pH optimum in the neutral
to slightly alkaline range. In contrast to the acid invertases, neutral/alkaline invertases are not
glycosylated and hydrolyze only sucrose indicating that they are not fructofuranosidases.
Neutral/alkaline invertase activity is strongly inhibited by its reaction products; however, activity
is not inhibited by heavy metal ions indicating a different catalytic site than that of the acid
invertases. To date, neutral/alkaline invertases have not been found in association with a protein
inhibitor.
Regulation of Invertase
Sugars
Sugars play important roles in plants not only as fuel for metabolism, but they also
generate osmotic pressure and act as signaling molecules for various metabolic pathways. Sugars
have been shown to act as repressors of genes related to sugar acquisition and mobilization as
well as activators of genes related to sugar storage and utilization (Koch, 1996; Rolland et al.,
2002; Halford and Paul, 2003). As one of only two enzymes able to cleave sucrose, invertase is
an important player in sugar signaling. The majority of acid invertases have been shown to be
sugar induced rather than repressed (Roitsch, 1999; Roitsch and Ehness, 2000). This is consistent
with their proposed roles in carbon use versus carbon acquisition (Koch, 1996; Rolland et al.,
2002; Koch, 2004). However, some isoforms of vacuolar invertase have been shown to be
inhibited by sugars. This has been the case in tomato where transcripts for vacuolar invertase
TIV1 were shown to be reduced after treatment with 20 mM glucose (Godt and Roitsch, 1997b).
In maize, transcript as well as activity for vacuolar invertase Ivr1 was also shown to be repressed
in the presence of 4 % glucose (Xu et al., 1996).
20
Hormones
Phytohormones play a central role in controlling growth, differentiation and development
in plants. As such, these hormones are particularly involved in regulating sink strength (Kuiper,
1993) and carbohydrate partitioning (Brenner and Cheikh, 1995). Invertases have been shown to
be regulated by the full set of phytohormones (Roitsch et al., 2003). In most cases this is related
to an increased demand for carbohydrates as a result of the hormone stimulated growth. In a
promoter study of the Lin5 invertase promoter linked to a reporter gene in tomato, it was shown
that gibberellic acid, auxin, and ABA all increased GUS activity indicating induction of this
isoform by these hormones (Proels et al., 2003). Work has also been done in maize
demonstrating that ABA increases the accumulation of the vacuolar invertase Ivr2 activity
(Trouverie et al., 2003). Brassinosteroids (Goetz et al., 2000), zeatin (Godt and Roitsch, 1997b),
ethylene (Linden et al., 1996) and cytokinin (Ehness and Roitsch, 1997) have all also been
shown to alter transcript accumulation of various invertase isoforms in plants.
Wounding and Pathogens
The wounding of plants is a common occurrence that can result in water loss as well as
pathogen infection. Response to wounding therefore often involves mechanisms intended to
counter osmotic stress as well as pathogen attack (Reymond and Farmer, 1998; Reymond et al.,
2000). As invading organisms alter sugar levels and effectively increase the sink of the tissue
being invaded, increases in invertase activity and expression logically follows. It is often difficult
to distinguish the invertase activity of the invading pathogen from that of the host plant (Ruffner
et al., 1992). In 1990, it was shown that carrot extracellular invertase transcript accumulates
dramatically after bacterial infection in the roots and leaves as well as after mechanical
wounding (Sturm and Chrispeels, 1990a). Results obtained from studying infection by biotrophic
fungi (Fotopoulos et al., 2003), necrotrophic fungi (Benhamou et al., 1991) and viruses (Herbers
21
et al., 2000) all show increases in invertase activity. Wounding has been shown in numerous
systems to correlate with increases in invertase activity and transcript level. An increase in either
one or both of these has been demonstrated in carrot (Sturm and Chrispeels, 1990a; Ramloch-
Lorenz et al., 1993), red goosefoot (Ehness and Roitsch, 1997), tomato (Ohyama et al., 1998),
sugar beet (Rosenkranz et al., 2001) and pea (Zhang et al., 1996).
Environmental Stimuli
The partitioning and allocation of photoassimilates can be affected by several
environmental factors such as temperature, gravity, light, wounding, drought and nutrient
availability (Wardlaw, 1990). As would be expected, these stimuli have all been demonstrated to
alter invertase transcript abundance and/or activity levels. Cold temperatures have stimulated
invertase transcripts that were undetectable at higher temperatures in potato tubers (Pressey and
Shaw, 1966) and Jerusalem artichoke tubers (Goupil et al., 1988). In sweet potato (Huang et al.,
1999) and tulip (Balk and de Boer, 1999), cold temperatures were shown to dramatically increase
the activity of invertase. Alternative splicing has also been shown to occur in potato resulting in
the elimination of the β-fructosidase motif (Bournay et al., 1996). Invertase transcripts are also
induced and peak at one hour after gravistimulation (Kaufman et al., 1985; Wu et al., 1993a; Wu
et al., 1993b). Far-red light also increases cell wall invertase activity in radish (Zouaghi and
Rollin, 1976) and wheat (Krishnan et al., 1985). Salinity generally causes a reduction in sink
enzyme activities. These in turn could contribute to observed increases in sucrose of source
leaves and decreases in photosynthesis from both feedback inhibition and sugar-repression of
photosynthetic genes. Experiments in tomato revealed that in a salt sensitive strain, growth and
photosynthesis were not positively correlated as they were in the salt tolerant strain. In this salt
sensitive strain, growth and photosynthesis were both negatively correlated with glucose,
fructose and sucrose accumulation in young and old leaves, suggesting a blockage in their use for
22
growth. In the salt tolerant variety, transient increases in these same sugars were accompanied by
increases in acid invertase activity (Balibrea et al., 2000).
Invertase Investigations in Transgenic Plants
Invertase’s irreversible reaction combined with its location in a variety of cellular
compartments makes it a key component in the carbon utilization strategy of the plant and thus
an ideal target for manipulation to understand carbon allocation and partitioning.
Several groups working with tomato (Dickinson et al., 1991), tobacco (Sonnewald et al.,
1991) and potato (Heineke et al., 1992) all saw very similar results after overexpressing the yeast
invertase, SUC2, in the apoplast, cytosol, and vacuole. These invertase overexpressors all had the
common theme of turning source tissues into sink tissues and reducing the sucrose available for
export. All plants demonstrated stunted growth and reduced root formation, including a reduction
in the number of tubers produced in the case of potato. These tubers also had an increase in the
protein to starch ratio. The mature (source) leaves in all three plants accumulated starches in
addition to simple sugars, while in the case of the cytosolic overexpressors, these accumulations
were also seen in the young (sink) leaves. Leaves were curved indicating rapid cell expansion or
division. The plants also demonstrated bleaching and necrotic regions that appeared to be linked
to the source state of the leaf. These lesions began at the leaf margin and moved inward while
also being accompanied by a reduction in photosynthesis.
The cell wall and vacuolar invertases have been repressed in several plant species,
including tomato (Ohyama et al., 1995), potato (Zrenner et al., 1996), and carrot (Tang and
Sturm, 1999). However, the results from these experiments were more varied than those of the
invertase overexpressors, although the theme of increased sucrose content accompanied by a
decrease in hexoses pervaded. In tomato these alterations in sugar accumulations appeared in
both the fruit and leaves. In addition to altered sugar levels, the fruit had elevated rates of
23
ethylene evolution. The wounding induced activity of invertase was also suppressed in the
transgenic plants.
The results from repressing the cell wall and vacuolar invertases in carrot are probably the
most interesting. Growth was shown to be altered at very early stages of development. The
transgenic, cotyledon-stage embryos were still masses of cells while the control plants had
already developed two to three leaves and one primary root. However, when these plantlets were
grown on media supplemented with hexoses, their growth returned to normal. After maturation
and transfer to soil, the plants expressing the cell wall antisense cDNA had a much bushier
appearance and accumulated more sucrose and starch than the controls. The taproot size was also
reduced and contained lower levels of carbohydrates than that of the controls. The dry weight
ratio of leaf to root shifted from 1:3 in the control to 17:1 in the cell wall antisense transgenics.
The vacuolar antisense plants also had increased numbers of leaves, although the tap root
developed normally, yet slightly smaller. The leaf to shoot ratio in these plants was 1.5:1.
Research Objectives
The purpose of this research was to investigate invertase contributions to carbon allocation
and partitioning in a woody perennial. To achieve this goal, the invertase family was identified
and annotated using the sequenced genome of Populus trichocarpa. Expression characteristics of
the invertase family were then examined across multiple tissues as well as through various
exogenous treatments including auxin, nitrogen-supplemented fertilizer and wounding. The
response of two poplar vacuolar invertases (PtVIN2 and -3) to exogenous sugar treatments was
examined and compared to the sugar responses of Arabidopsis, maize and rice. A reverse genetic
approach was also employed by ectopic expression of yeast invertase in transgenic poplar. In
conjunction, RNAi was used to target endogenous poplar invertases for down-regulation.
24
NIN
VIN
CIN
CIN
LIGHT
NIN
VIN
CIN
CIN
NIN
VIN
CIN
CIN
LIGHT
Figure 1-1. Sucrose synthesis, transport and metabolism in source and sink cells as well as invertase localization. This cartoon demonstrates apoplastic phloem loading in the source leaf and apoplastic or symplastic phloem unloading in the sink tissue. In this scheme, sucrose (S) is synthesized in the cytosol from triose-phosphates (TP). Sucrose then enters the apoplast where it is actively transported into the phloem by a sucrose proton symporter. This phloem loading step can be affected by activity levels of the apoplastically located cell wall invertase (CIN) which hydrolyzes sucrose into glucose (G) and fructose (F). Sucrose can be unloaded from the phloem either symplastically or apoplastically. From the apoplast, sucrose can enter the sink cell directly via a sucrose proton symporter, or be hydrolyzed by CIN into glucose and fructose. In the sink cells, sucrose can be cleaved by sucrose synthase (SUSY) into UDP-glucose (UDPG) and fructose, or hydrolyzed by a neutral/alkaline invertase (NIN). Sucrose can also enter the vacuole where it can then be hydrolyzed by a vacuolar invertase (VIN). After phosphorylation by hexokinase (HK), the hexoses can enter respiration. Figure adapted from Rausch et al. (2004).
25
Figure 1-2. Protein inhibitors of cell wall invertases (CIF, cell wall inhibitor of fructosidase) share strong sequence similarity with inhibitors of pectin methylesterase (PMEI, pectin methylesterase inhibitor), but crystal structures indicate important differences in flexibility. The top panel depicts CIF. The oval denotes an α-hairpin thought responsible for binding specificity of CIF and PMEI. The α-hairpin in CIF is rigid at all pHs and temperatures tested. The bottom panel shows PMEI in three different conformations that demonstrate the flexibility of the PMEI α-hairpin. (Hothorn et al., 2004a; Hothorn et al., 2004b; Hothorn and Scheffzek, 2006). Images were constructed by Protein Explorer (Martz, 2002). Figure adapted from Huang et al. (2007).
26
Figure 1-3. Representation of cell wall and vacuolar isoforms of carrot invertase (Sturm, 1999).
27
CHAPTER 2 EVOLUTION AND DIVERSITY OF INVERTASE GENES IN POPULUS TRICHOCARPA
Introduction
Invertase (EC 3.2.1.26), also known as a β-fructofuranosidase, catalyzes the irreversible
hydrolysis of sucrose into glucose and fructose, indicating this enzyme has a key role in carbon
utilization. These sugars are synthesized in photosynthesizing source leaves and transported to
non-photosynthesizing sink tissues. Sucrose is the primary form of sugar transport in most
plants, establishing this disaccharide and its glucose and fructose components as central to plant
growth and development.
The invertase family is composed of two smaller sub-families distinguished by their pH
optima for activity and are thought to have distinct evolutionary origins in plants (Winter and
Huber, 2000). The acid invertase sub-family is targeted to either the cell wall or vacuole
(Haouazine-Takvorian et al., 1997; Sherson et al., 2003) and is believed to have originated from
respiratory eukaryotes and aerobic bacteria (Sturm and Chrispeels, 1990b). The neutral/alkaline
invertases appear to be localized to the cytosol (Chen and Black, 1992; Van den Ende and Van
Laere, 1995) and are found in cyanobacteria, where the family is thought to have originated
(Vargas et al., 2003), green algae and plants. The presence of these two sub-families reflect the
hypothesized origin of green algae and higher plants; the endosymbiotic event in which a
cyanobacteria invaded a non-photosynthetic, respiratory eukaryote (Mereschkowsky, 1905;
Margulis, 1981; Margulis and Sagan, 2003).
Members of the acid invertase sub-family share enzymatic and biochemical properties as
well as sequence similarity. Both vacuolar and cell wall targeted isoforms are β-
fructofuranosidases that can hydrolyze fructose-containing compounds other than sucrose, such
as raffinose and stachyose. Acid invertases are closely related to a class of enzymes known as
28
fructan exohydrolases (FEH). FEHs are difficult to distinguish from acid invertases by sequence
alone and are thought to have evolved from acid invertases even though FEHs exclusively break
down fructans and cannot hydrolyze sucrose (Van den Ende et al., 2002). It was recently
discovered that two previously annotated cell wall invertases from Arabidopsis (AtcwINV3 and
AtcwINV6) may, in fact, be FEHs (De Coninck et al., 2005).
Much less is known about the neutral/alkaline invertase sub-family due to purification
difficulties and low, unstable enzymatic activity (Sturm and Tang, 1999; Roitsch and Gonzalez,
2004). This sub-family likely has a different mode of action than the acid invertase sub-family
since sucrose is the sole substrate and they are not inhibited by heavy metals, elements that
strongly inhibit the acid invertases (Roitsch and Gonzalez, 2004).
An important driver of species origination and diversification is gene duplication.
Duplication makes it possible for a gene to acquire new functions without losing the function of
the progenitor gene (Kramer et al., 1998; Lynch and Conery, 2000; Sankoff, 2001; Becker and
Theissen, 2003; Irish, 2003; Litt and Irish, 2003; Zahn et al., 2005). Gene duplication can occur
in tandem, through the duplication of a chromosomal segment, an entire chromosome, or through
genome duplication (Otto and Whitton, 2000; Wendel, 2000; Adams and Wendel, 2005).
Chromosomal duplications result in conserved, colinear locus order that can be used to infer
ancestry of loci of interest both within and between species (Lynch and Conery, 2000).
Poplar is known to have undergone at least two genome duplication events in its
evolutionary history (Sterck et al., 2005; Tuskan et al., 2006). The first genomic duplication
event occurred prior to the divergence of Arabidopsis and poplar and is known as the “eurosid”
duplication event (Bowers et al., 2003; Blanc and Wolfe, 2004; De Bodt et al., 2005; Zahn et al.,
2005; Tuskan et al., 2006). The second genome duplication event occurred after the divergence
29
of Arabidopsis and poplar but prior to the divergence of the Populus and Salix genera and is
referred to as the “salicoid” event (Tuskan et al., 2006). Arabidopsis is known to have undergone
at least one genomic duplication event after the divergence with poplar (Bowers et al., 2003;
Blanc and Wolfe, 2004; De Bodt et al., 2005; Zahn et al., 2005; Tuskan et al., 2006). By
knowing the timing and location of genomic duplication events, the evolutionary development of
a variety of gene families can be predicted in these species.
The recently released sequence of the poplar genome (Tuskan et al., 2006) opens the door
for systematic analysis of metabolically important gene families in a model tree. Here, I report
the identification of the poplar invertase gene family and show expression data from both
microarray and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) experiments. I show
that acid and neutral/alkaline invertase genes are regulated in vegetative or floral organs. An
examination of the microsyntenic regions surrounding the poplar invertase genes reveals
extensive colinearity with Arabidopsis invertases and allows orthologous and paralogous
relationships among genes to be inferred.
Materials and Methods
Plant Material
Rooted softwood cuttings of Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray) (genotype “Nisqually-1”)
were planted in 8 L pots and placed in a fan- and pad-cooled greenhouse with natural light
augmented with full spectrum fluorescent lighting during the winter to give a day length of 15 h.
Plants were grown on an ebb-and-flow flood bench system with a daily supply of Peters
Professional® 20-10-20 water-soluble fertilizer diluted to a final concentration of 4 mM
nitrogen. Plants were grown until 80 cm tall at which point microarray and quantitative RT-PCR
(RT-qPCR) experiments were performed. Floral organs used in RT-PCR experiments were
30
harvested from a Populus deltoides growing locally on the University of Florida-Gainesville
campus.
BLAST Searches and DNA Annotation
The Populus acid and neutral/alkaline invertase gene families were identified using the
tBLASTn function of the Joint Genome Institute’s database (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/) and the
previously described genes AtvacINV1 and -2 (At1g62660, At1g12240), AtcwINV1-6
(At3g13790, At3g52600,At1g55120, At2g36190, At3g13784, At5g11920), from Arabidopsis
and InvDC1-5 (Accession #s X69321, X78424, X78423, Y18707, Y18706) from carrot (Lee and
Sturm, 1996; Sturm, 1996; Sherson et al., 2003). The resulting nucleotide sequences were
annotated using a combination of protein alignments with known Arabidopsis and carrot
invertases as well as the predictions of GENSCAN (http://genes.mit.edu/GENSCAN.html)
(Burge and Karlin, 1997).
Construction of Sequence Similarity Trees
Predicted amino acid sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW
(http://clustalw.genome.jp) to construct similarity trees using the TREEVIEW program (Page,
1996). PAUP (Swofford, 1993) was used for bootstrap analysis with 100,000 iterations.
Identification of Gene Duplication
Gene duplications were identified as “recent” or “ancient” by Tuskan et al. (2006) where
“recent” and “ancient” refer to the “salicoid” and “eurosid” duplication events, respectively.
Briefly, the poplar and Arabidopsis genomes were reconstructed into conserved syntenic
segments that were subsequently compared with a variant of the algorithm described by Hokamp
et al. (2003). Tandem duplications were defined as neighboring gene models with high sequence
identity on a chromosomal segment.
31
Isolation of RNA and RT-PCR Assay
Total RNA was extracted using standard methods (Chang, 1993), DNase-treated and
purified on RNAeasy QIAGEN columns (Valencia, CA). Purified RNA (5 μg) was used to
synthesize cDNA using a mixture of 500 ng oligo-dT, 100 ng random primers, and M-MLV-RT
as per manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), with the exception that the DTT
was excluded. PCR reactions were run with a single step at 94 ˚C for 3 min, and then 35 cycles
of 94 ˚C (30 s), 57 ˚C (30 s), and 72 ˚C (4 min), and a single step at 72 ˚C for 10 min. Actin was
used to verify integrity of cDNA template. All primers are listed in Table 2-2.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Gene expression was analyzed using the SYBR Green kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and
Mx3000P thermo-cycler (Stratagene) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 1 μl of the
synthesized cDNA and 0.15 μl of a 0.25 μM solution of each primer were used for each 50 μl
RT-qPCR reaction. Primers were designed using NetPrimer (Premier Biosoft International, Palo
Alto, CA) software and synthesized by Invitrogen. Each real-time PCR reaction was performed
in triplicate (technical replicates) on four individual plants (biological replicates) and carried out
for 40 cycles with annealing, extension, and melting temperatures of 55 °C, 72 °C, and 95 °C,
respectively. Melting curves were generated to check the specificity of the amplified fragments.
In the case of PtVIN2, an extension temperature of 79 °C with the fluorescence reading taken at
the end of the run was used to correct for a spurious primer-dimer amplicon. Changes (n-fold) in
gene expression relative to the geometric mean (Vandesompele et al., 2002) of three control
genes encoding actin, ubiquitin and ubiquitin_L (Brunner et al., 2004) were determined using the
program DART-PCRv1.0 (Peirson et al., 2003).
32
Genomic DNA Isolation
Genomic DNA was isolated from poplar shoot tip tissue. Approximately 250 mg of tissue
was ground in liquid nitrogen and added to a buffer containing 0.3 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris (pH
7.9), 1 mM EDTA, and 4 mg/mL diethyldithiocarbamic acid. Samples were spun (20,800 rcf)
and pellets resuspended in a buffer containing 100 mM Tris (pH 7.9), 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM
EDTA, 1 % SDS, 0.1 % 2-mercaptoethanol, and 100 μg/ml proteinase K. Samples were
incubated at 65 ˚C for 1 h, spun (20,800 rcf) and supernatant extracted with chloroform.
Isopropanol was used to precipitate the DNA at room temperature, spun (20,800 rcf), and
resuspended in Tris-EDTA buffer. One μl RNase A was added to DNA sample and incubated at
37 ˚C for 30 min. The chloroform extraction was repeated, followed by ethanol precipitation in
presence of sodium acetate at -80 °C for 1 h. Samples were spun for 10 min (20,800 rcf), air
dried and resuspended in Tris-EDTA buffer. Ten ng of genomic DNA was used in PCR reactions
as previously described.
Microarray Design and Analysis
Poplar whole-genome 60-mer oligonucleotide microarrays (three different 60-mer probes
per gene model) were designed by NimbleGen (Madison, WI) in collaboration with Oak Ridge
National Laboratory. Labeling, hybridization and scanning were carried out by NimbleGen using
standard procedures (Quesada et al. unpublished data). Briefly, signal intensity detected for each
probe was log2-transformed, normalized, and contrasted to a set of 20 negative control probes. A
mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to each individual probeset with gene
as a fixed effect, and probe as a random effect. P-values were adjusted for false discovery rate
(Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995), with the modifications reported by Storey and Tibshirani
(Storey and Tibshirani, 2003). All the analyses described were carried out using SAS and JMP
software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). For contrasting the transcript abundance between treatments,
33
individual probes that gave no signal on any array based on comparison to the negative controls
were excluded, and a complete mixed ANOVA model was used that included gene and tissue
type as fixed effects, while probe ID, plant, and the interaction of tissue by plant were treated as
random effects. Microarray data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)
database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/); accession number GSE6422.
Results
Identification of Poplar Invertase Genes
I used Arabidopsis and carrot invertase genes as queries to identify 24 putative invertase
genes (Table 2-1), eight in the acid invertase sub-family and 16 in the neutral/alkaline invertase
sub-family, and followed the rice invertase nomenclature (Hirose et al., 2002; Ji et al., 2005).
The distinct origin of the acid and neutral/alkaline sub-families (Sturm, 1999; Vargas et al.,
2003) is reflected in their intron/exon structures (Figure 2-1) and amino acid alignments (Figure
2-5). The acid invertases can be further subdivided into two well-supported clades, “α” and “β”,
which are inferred to be cell wall and vacuolar targeted, respectively (Figure 2-2A). This
inference is based on sequence similarity to the Arabidopsis invertases. The neutral/alkaline
invertases also subdivide into two clades (α and β) that are supported both by bootstrap analysis
(Figure 2-2B) and intron/exon structure (Figure 2-1B), however the functional implications of
this sub-division are not clear.
Four (PtNIN13-16) of the 16 neutral/alkaline invertases are encoded by seemingly
incomplete ORFs (data not shown). PtNIN13 is missing ORFs for the first and last exons. In the
case of PtNIN14 and -15, a portion of the ORF encoding the third exon is missing as well as
ORFs corresponding to the first and last exons. Finally, PtNIN16 contains a short ORF encoding
a portion of the third exon. In all cases, genomic sequence was examined for several Kb in either
direction until neighboring genes were identified in order to verify that the sequences were truly
34
missing. Evidence of gene expression was obtained for all four of these “partial” genes using one
or more of the methods listed in Table 2-1. Further work will need to be performed to understand
their evolution.
Structure of the Poplar Invertase Genes
The acid invertase sub-family is encoded by seven exons whose locations are generally
conserved in plants (Tymowska-Lalanne and Kreis, 1998b). This family also contains PtVIN1
which contains no introns. All eight genes encode the motifs NDPNG and WECXDF, which are
essential for catalytic activity and are conserved in this gene family (Sturm and Chrispeels,
1990b) (Figure 2-5A). Except for PtVIN1, the NDPNG motif is partially encoded by a mini-exon
encoding the tripeptide DPN, one of the smallest known exons in plants (Bournay et al., 1996).
There are several key features that distinguish the β clade of the poplar acid invertases
from the α clade with a highly significant bootstrap value of 100 %. The first two features are N-
terminal and C-terminal extensions, both proposed to play a role in targeting to the vacuole
(Sturm, 1999). Third is the conserved WECXDF domain that contains one of the three
carboxylate groups required for activity (Pons et al., 1998; Alberto et al., 2004); the X in this
domain is a proline in the α clade and a valine in the β clade (Figure 2-5A).
The neutral/alkaline invertase sub-family also clusters into α and β clades based on amino
acid alignments (Figure 2-2B, Figure 2-5B) that are distinct and well supported (Figure 2-2B).
The members of the α clade (PtNIN1-6) are encoded by six exons with conserved locations
(Figure 2-1B), whereas the six members of the β clade (PtNIN7-12) are encoded by four exons
(Figure 2-1B). The different intron/exon structures and the different number of exons between
the clades, suggests that the α and β clades arose from different ancestral genes.
35
Expression of the Poplar Invertase Gene Family
Expression of the poplar invertase family in mature leaves, young leaves, nodes,
internodes, and roots was examined using whole genome microarrays where evidence for
expression was detected for 16 of the 24 genes (Figure 2-3A). RT-qPCR with gene specific
primers designed against PtCIN3, PtVIN3, PtNIN3 and PtNIN9 was then used to validate the
microarray data using the same samples that were analyzed in the microarrays (Figure 2-3B).I
then obtained evidence for transcript-level regulation of PtNIN7, -10, -11 and -16 in additional
microarray analyses of responses to nitrogen availability (PtNIN7 and -11) (data not shown) and
exogenous auxin (PtNIN10 and -16) (data not shown).
Analyses of microarrays provided evidence for expression of all but four invertase genes
(PtCIN1 and -2, PtVIN1, PtNIN13). One possible explanation for this result is that these four
invertase genes are not transcribed in the organ(s) examined. Alternatively, the gene may have
been transcribed in the organ(s) examined but transcript abundance was not distinguishable from
background on the arrays. To test the first hypothesis, RT-PCR was carried out on a larger
number of poplar organs. I detected transcripts for PtCIN1 and -2 in floral organs and not organs
used in the array analysis (Figure 2-3C). This is consistent with previous results in tomato (Godt
and Roitsch, 1997a), carrot (Lorenz et al., 1995), and Arabidopsis (Tymowska-Lalanne and
Kreis, 1998a; Sherson et al., 2003) where certain cell wall invertases are expressed solely in
floral organs. I detected transcripts for PtVIN1 and PtNIN13 using RT-PCR in nearly all organs
tested (Figure 2-3C). This indicates that the transcripts of these two genes were below the
detection level of the arrays.
Evolutionary Development of the Poplar Invertase Family
Determining orthology and paralogy between genes can be a useful tool in elucidating
gene function. The shared evolutionary history between Arabidopsis and poplar, as well as the
36
extensive research previously conducted in the Arabidopsis invertase gene family, makes
Arabidopsis invertases ideal candidates to compare with poplar invertases in order to determine
orthology. Amino acid alignments between poplar and Arabidopsis invertases (Figure 2-2,
Figure 2-5) reveal little about orthology since the Arabidopsis invertases are more similar to each
other than they are to their presumed poplar orthologs. Consequently, I examined the
chromosomal segments encoding invertases to infer orthology since the linear order of ORFs are
often conserved after duplication events.
I examined paralogous regions of the poplar genome, as defined by Tuskan et al. (2006),
containing the neutral/alkaline invertase sub-family members and found that five of the 16 poplar
neutral/alkaline invertases appear to have originated in the recent salicoid genome duplication
event (Table 2-1). No evidence was found for tandem duplications (defined as identical, adjacent
genes on the chromosome), or for expansion of the neutral/alkaline family as a result of the more
ancient eurosid genome duplication event that occurred in the common ancestor of poplar and
Arabidopsis. Therefore, the salicoid duplication event can explain the growth of the poplar
neutral/alkaline invertase family relative to the Arabidopsis gene family (16 versus 9 members,
respectively).
To establish orthology between the poplar acid invertase sub-family and the more widely
studied Arabidopsis acid invertase sub-family, I compared the genomic organization of the two
species’ acid invertase sub-families and found substantial conservation of microsyntenic regions
(Figure 2-4A). These conserved, microsyntenic regions suggest that the common ancestor to
poplar and Arabidopsis contained two cell wall invertases and one vacuolar invertase (Figure 2-
4B). I hypothesize that these three progenitor invertases (VINa, CINa, and CINb) underwent a
37
series of duplication events prior to and subsequent to the speciation event between poplar and
Arabidopsis, as outlined in Figure 2-4B.
Vacuolar invertases PtVIN2 and -3 lie within conserved, colinear chromosomal segments
(Figure 2-4B), indicating that a chromosomal duplication event gave rise to these two invertases.
Similarly, the two Arabidopsis vacuolar invertases (AtvacINV1 and -2) reside in a conserved,
colinear arrangement (Figure 2-4A), also indicative of a chromosomal duplication event.
Conservation can also be observed across the poplar/Arabidopsis species divide. For example, a
nuclear apical meristem (NAM) family ORF lies downstream of the vacuolar invertases on
relevant chromosomal segments in both species (Figure 2-4A). In addition, loci encoding a
thylakoid luminal related protein, a 3-oxoacyl-ACP synthase III protein and a flavin containing
monoxygenase are located on colinear chromosomal segments with both the poplar and
Arabidopsis vacuolar invertases (Figure 2-4A). The colinearity of multiple loci across
Arabidopsis and poplar suggests that a genomic duplication event of a progenitor vacuolar
invertase and surrounding loci occurred in a common ancestor of poplar and Arabidopsis giving
rise to the two vacuolar invertases (Figure 2-4A, B).
Two additional chromosomal duplication events can be identified through colinearity. The
conservation of loci encoding a kinesin motor related protein, ubiquitin-2, and a 40S ribosomal
protein S9 can be seen surrounding AtcwINV2 and -4 as well as PtCIN3 and the tandem pair
PtCIN1 and -2. The conservation of this chromosomal segment between Arabidopsis and poplar
is again indicative of a duplication event giving rise to these genes prior to the Arabidopsis and
poplar speciation event (Figure 2-4B). Because the presence of the tandem pair PtCIN1 and -2
occurs only in poplar, duplication likely occurred after the poplar and Arabidopsis speciation
event.
38
The microsyntenic segment containing the poplar cell wall invertases PtCIN4 and -5 is
more difficult to interpret (Figure 2-4B). This chromosomal segment contains a locus encoding a
C2H2 zinc finger family protein that is shared on two chromosomal segments in Arabidopsis that
also contain AtcwINV3 and the tandem pair AtcwINV1 and -5. This poplar segment also contains
a DEAD box RNA helicase downstream of the tandem invertase pair that is conserved on the
AtcwINV3 chromosomal segment but absent from the tandem AtcwINV1 and -5 chromosomal
segment. The simplest explanation of the development of these invertases is a tandem
duplication event prior to the poplar/Arabidopsis speciation event (duplication of CINa, Figure
2-4B). Following the speciation event, a chromosomal duplication event occurred only in
Arabidopsis to give rise to a tandem pair; AtcwINV3 and the other member which was lost.
Poplar-specific innovations include a tandem duplication giving rise to the PtCIN1 and -2
pair (Table 2-1, Figure 2-4) and the appearance of PtVIN1, the third poplar vacuolar invertase,
described in more detail in the next section. I hypothesize PtVIN1 arose from a processed PtVIN2
mRNA that was inserted in trans- into the poplar genome and therefore is not colinear with any
other invertase.
Arabidopsis innovations include AtcwINV3, which apparently arose from a duplication of
the chromosomal segment containing AtcwINV1 and -5. This duplication was subsequently
followed by the loss of one of the proposed two new invertases resulting in the single AtcwINV3.
The sixth and final cell wall invertase in Arabidopsis, AtcwINV6, poses a bit of a conundrum.
The lack of colinearity with other regions of the Arabidopsis genome and its isolation on the
protein similarity tree (Figure 2-2A) makes it difficult to derive a putative progenitor. I
hypothesize that AtcwINV6 arose from a gene duplication event followed by functional
divergence, as this is the most common mode of gene family diversification. However, because
39
genes are frequently rearranged and/or lost after chromosomal duplication events, the absence of
colinearity cannot rule out a chromosomal duplication event. Some other technique will need to
be employed to define the origin of AtcwINV6.
Putative Evidence for Origins of PtVIN1
In its recent evolutionary history, poplar has acquired an innovation in the acid invertase
family. PtVIN1 is an intronless invertase that clusters with the β group, indicating vacuolar
targeting (Figure 2-1, 2-2). An intronless invertase, to my knowledge, has not previously been
reported. This gene retains all of the characteristics relevant to the acid invertase family with the
exception of introns (Figure 2-5A).
PtVIN1 consists of a single 1.6 Kb ORF with several possible upstream TATAA boxes and
a 3’ polyadenylation signal (data not shown). I verified the sequence obtained from the Joint
Genome Institute’s database by designing gene specific primers (Table 2-2) flanking the entire
ORF of PtVIN1 and cloning and sequencing PCR products amplified from both purified P.
trichocarpa genomic DNA as well as cDNA generated from DNase-treated RNA. PtVIN1
transcript was detected in all tissues examined (Figure 2-3C).
I speculate that PtVIN1 arose relatively recently in poplar evolutionary history as a
processed transcript of PtVIN2 (86 % identity at the nucleotide level and 77 % identity at the
amino acid level) that was reverse transcribed and reinserted into the genome. This phenomenon
is unusual but not unprecedented with examples being found in the alcohol dehydrogenase gene
family in the genus Leavenworthia (Charlesworth et al., 1998), as well as numerous examples in
human, rat, and dog (Coulombe-Huntington and Majewski, 2007).
Discussion
In my study of the poplar genome, I identified 24 putative invertase genes: eight acid and
16 neutral/alkaline invertases. The poplar genome encodes ca. 45,000 genes which, when
40
compared to ca. 27,000 genes in Arabidopsis represents an approximately 1.6-fold increase in
gene number (Tuskan et al., 2006). This total gene number expansion is not the result of unique
poplar genes, but rather the expansion of specific gene families (Tuskan et al., 2006).
Interestingly, the expansion of poplar’s invertase gene family relative to Arabidopsis and rice is
not consistent between the two invertase sub-families. Arabidopsis contains 17 members: eight
acid and nine neutral/alkaline invertases (Vargas et al., 2003; Ji et al., 2005), whereas the rice
genome encodes 19 invertase genes: eleven acid and eight neutral/alkaline invertases (Ji et al.,
2005). Thus, the overall increase in poplar invertase gene numbers is driven primarily by an
increase in the neutral/alkaline invertases.
One explanation for the expansion of the neutral/alkaline invertase sub-family in poplar
may lie in the apparent lack of an active phloem loading step in this group of woody perennial
plants. Turgeon and Medville (1998) suggest that in willow, and likely poplar (both are members
of the Salicaceae), photoassimilate accumulation in the source phloem is accomplished via an
uninterrupted, symplastically connected sucrose concentration gradient between the mesophyll
cells and the sieve element-companion cell complex (SE-CCC). This is in contrast to both
apoplastic phloem loaders and symplastic phloem loaders where the solute concentration in the
SE-CCC is dramatically higher than the solute concentration in the surrounding apoplastic space
and mesophyll cytoplasm. Turgeon and Medville (1998) propose that regulation of the sucrose
concentration gradient from the mesophyll cells to the SE-CCC in poplar could be maintained in
the cytoplasm and/or vacuole. This could implicate both neutral/alkaline invertases (thought to
be cytoplasmically located) and vacuolar invertases as key components of this pathway. The
growth of the poplar neutral/alkaline invertase subfamily occurred in the recent genomic
duplication event (salicoid) that took place prior to the willow/poplar speciation event (Tuskan et
41
al., 2006). This makes it likely that willow also contains the expanded neutral/alkaline invertase
sub-family.
Of the 16 neutral/alkaline invertases identified in poplar, four (PtNIN13-16) are missing
significant portions of their coding regions. The sequences found in these four neutral/alkaline
invertases retain conserved intron/exon splice sites, conserved sequence motifs and the ability to
be transcribed (data not shown). This transcriptional evidence appears to rule out these genes
from being defined as “pseudogenes” under traditional definitions of the term in which
pseudogenes are transcriptionally and translationally silent and therefore not subject to selection
(Li et al., 1981). However, there are examples of transcribed pseudogenes in eukaryotic
organisms including human, mouse, silk moth, Arabidopsis and liverwort (Balakirev et al.,
2003). McCarrey and Riggs (1986) propose that pseudogenes could act as negative regulators of
transcription of their progenitor genes by providing antisense RNA to hybridize with the sense
RNA of the progenitor. Troyanovsky and Leube (1994) identified cis elements in the promoter
region of a pseodogene derived from human cytokeratin 17 that can interact with distal elements
in the promoter of the functional gene to regulate transcriptional activity. Thus, PtNIN13-16 may
have biologically relevant functions in gene regulation, as opposed to invertase enzyme activity,
and may still be subjected to selection.
ClustalW and bootstrap analysis of the acid invertase families of poplar and Arabidopsis
clearly divide the acid invertases into the α clade (cell wall invertases) and the β clade (vacuolar
invertases). It has recently been reported that two of six cell wall invertases in Arabidopsis may
not be invertases, but rather fructan exohydrolases (FEHs) (De Coninck et al., 2005). FEH
protein sequences are nearly identical to those of demonstrated acid invertase proteins but FEH
does not use sucrose as a substrate (De Coninck et al., 2005). As I did not test recombinant cell
42
wall invertase activity in this work, I cannot rule out that one or more of the five PtCIN genes
described here may encode an FEH.
To my knowledge, this work is the first report of a plant with more than two vacuolar
invertases. Analysis of the microsyntenic regions surrounding these vacuolar invertases in poplar
and Arabidopsis identified colinearity that I use to postulate that these genes arose from an
ancient gene duplication event in a common ancestor of these two species. In contrast, I found no
colinearity in the microsyntenic region containing PtVIN1 with regions in Arabidopsis or
elsewhere in the poplar genome. This, along with the lack of introns in PtVIN1, leads me to
hypothesize that PtVIN1 arose from a processed PtVIN2 mRNA that was inserted in trans- into
the poplar genome.
The absence of an intronless vacuolar invertase in any other organism studied to date
suggests that PtVIN1 arose recently in evolutionary history. It will be interesting to see if this
invertase anomaly extends to Populus species other than the sequenced Populus trichocarpa
genome. Work performed by Coulombe-Huntington and Majews (2007) on intron loss in
mammalian systems found that genes susceptible to intron loss tend to be involved in
housekeeping functions and expressed at high levels. This is consistent with the high expression
patterns of PtVIN2, the putative progenitor to the intronless PtVIN1. Because PtVIN1 has
retained all the features necessary for transcription, such as an intact TATAA binding site and no
indels or stop codons, it appears that there has been some level of selection in favor of the
expression of PtVIN1. The hypothesis that PtVIN1 originated as a reverse transcribed, processed
transcript is supported by the concomitant loss of all six introns from the presumed progenitor
locus PtVIN2.
43
One distinguishing feature of the expression of the invertase family is the floral specificity
of certain cell wall isoforms. Tomato Lin7 is floral specific with highest expression in the stamen
(Godt and Roitsch, 1997b). In carrot, InvDC2 was expressed solely in floral buds (Lorenz et al.,
1995) and in Arabidopsis, AtcwINV2 was found to be floral specific (Tymowska-Lalanne and
Kreis, 1998a). Poplar is a dioecious tree and, as I only collected floral material from a female
tree, I did not examine invertase expression in the male floral organs. Even so, I identified two
floral specific cell wall isoforms in PtCIN1 and -2.
The recently released assembly of the poplar genome (Tuskan et al., 2006) opens the door
for analyses of metabolically important gene families in a model tree. In this study of the
invertase gene family, I identified 24 putative gene family members and obtained evidence for
expression of all members. A better understanding of the roles that individual invertase isoforms
play in carbon utilization will be important in dissecting the functional implications of invertase
gene family evolution and diversity.
44
Table 2-1. Nomenclature and chromosomal location of 24 poplar invertase genes. Gene name Predicted compartment JGIv1.1 gene model name Linkage group location Expression Support Type of gene duplication Duplicate gene
Acid invertasesPtCIN1 Cell wall gw1.XVI.2453.1 16: 5729453 R tandem PtCIN2PtCIN2 Cell wall gw1.XVI.2454.1 16: 5739912 E, R tandem PtCIN1PtCIN3 Cell wall estExt_fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_VI1370 6: 13897519 E, M, R n/aPtCIN4 Cell wall estExt_fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_VI1536 6: 15233568 E, M, R tandem PtCIN5PtCIN5 Cell wall eugene3.00061607 6: 15229483 M tandem PtCIN4PtVIN1 Vacuole fgenesh4_pm.C_LG_III000407 3: 11913972 R insertion PtVIN2PtVIN2 Vacuole estExt_fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_III0902 3: 108433683 E, M, R ancient PtVIN3PtVIN3 Vacuole estExt_Genewise1_v1.C_LG_XV2841 15: 9251445 E, M, R ancient PtVIN2
Neutral/alkaline invertasesPtNIN1 Cytosol estExt_Genewise1_v1.C_LG_VIII2120 8: 6388303 E, M, R n/aPtNIN2 Cytosol eugene3.00130058 13: 512039 E, M, R recent PtNIN5PtNIN3 Cytosol gw1.VIII.2341.1 8: 1096197 E, M, R recent PtNIN4PtNIN4 Cytosol gw1.X.3512.1 10: 20965604 E, M, R recent PtNIN3PtNIN5 Cytosol gw1.131.249.1 scfld131: 616042 E, M, R recent PtNIN2PtNIN6 Cytosol gw1.66.49.1 scfld66: 160259 E, M, R n/aPtNIN7 Cytosol estExt_fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_V1531 5:16687404 E, M, R n/aPtNIN8 Cytosol eugene3.00190739 19: 9274739 E, M, R recent PtNIN12PtNIN9 Cytosol fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_IV001415 4: 15428994 E, M, R recent PtNIN11PtNIN10 Cytosol fgenesh4_pm.C_LG_II000804 2: 13356400 M, R recent PtNIN13PtNIN11 Cytosol gw1.IX.1371.1 9: 2392685 E, M, R recent PtNIN9PtNIN12 Cytosol eugene3.00410102 scfld41: 1148890 E, M, R recent PtNIN8
PtNIN13 a Cytosol gw1.XIV.1765.1 14: 3660215 R recent PtNIN10PtNIN14 b Cytosol gw1.XIV.4326.1 14: 11708730 M n/aPtNIN15 b Cytosol gw1.376.8.1 scfld376: 31617 E, M, R n/aPtNIN16 c Cytosol eugene3.00170140 17: 1427133 M n/a
aMissing first and last exon; bMissing first, last, and portions of third exons; cContains only portion of third exon. Type of predicted duplication event (if any) is noted. E: EST support; M: Microarray support; R: RT-PCR support; n/a: not assigned.
45
A PtVIN1
PtVIN2
PtCIN5
1Kb1Kb1Kb1Kb
PtCIN1
PtVIN3
PtCIN4
PtCIN2
PtCIN3
B PtNIN1
PtNIN2
PtNIN8
PtNIN9
PtNIN7
PtNIN10
PtNIN11
PtNIN12
PtNIN3
PtNIN5
PtNIN4
PtNIN6
1Kb1Kb
PtNIN1
PtNIN2
PtNIN8
PtNIN9
PtNIN7
PtNIN10
PtNIN11
PtNIN12
PtNIN3
PtNIN5
PtNIN4
PtNIN6
1Kb1Kb
Figure 2-1. Exon-intron structures of predicted invertase genes with complete exons (20 of 24). PtNIN13-16 are not represented here as the complete sequence could not be determined. A) Acid invertases. B) Neutral/alkaline invertases. Exons whose junctions have been verified (using EST and/or sequencing data) are represented by solid black boxes, exons whose junctions have not been verified are represented by empty boxes. Introns are represented by black lines.
46
A
α
β
59 100
95
54
85
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
PtCIN4
PtCIN1PtCIN2
PtCIN3
PtCIN5
AtvacINV2
(At1G12240)
PtVIN3
PtVIN1
PtVIN2
AtvacINV1
(At1G62660)
AtcwINV6(FEH)
(At5G11920)
AtcwINV3(FEH)
(At1G55120)
AtcwINV5
(At3G13784)
AtcwINV1
(At3G13790)
AtcwINV4
(At2G36190)
AtcwINV2
(At3G52600)
B
αβ
100
100
51
8665 65
100
100
69
93
93
10083
100
100
100
51
PtNIN10 PtNIN7
At1G35580
At4G09510
PtNIN8
PtNIN12
At1G72000At1G22650
At5G22510
PtNIN6
PtNIN4
PtNIN3
At3G065600
At3G05820 At1G56560
PtNIN1
PtNIN5
PtNIN2
PtNIN9PtNIN11 At4G34860
PtNIN1 PtNIN5
58
αβ
100
100
51
8665 65
100
100
69
93
93
10083
100
100
100
51
PtNIN10 PtNIN7
At1G35580
At4G09510
PtNIN8
PtNIN12
At1G72000At1G22650
At5G22510
PtNIN6
PtNIN4
PtNIN3
At3G065600
At3G05820 At1G56560
PtNIN1
PtNIN5
PtNIN2
PtNIN9PtNIN11 At4G34860
PtNIN1 PtNIN5
αβ
100
100
51
8665 65
100
100
69
93
93
10083
100
100
100
51
PtNIN10 PtNIN7
At1G35580
At4G09510
PtNIN8
PtNIN12
At1G72000At1G22650
At5G22510
PtNIN6
PtNIN4
PtNIN3
At3G065600
At3G05820 At1G56560
PtNIN1
PtNIN5
PtNIN2
PtNIN9PtNIN11 At4G34860
PtNIN1 PtNIN5
58
Figure 2-2. Invertase amino acid similarity trees based on full length sequences. A) Protein similarity tree of eight poplar and eight Arabidopsis acid invertases. α denotes cell wall invertases (PtCIN1-5) and β denotes vacuolar invertases (PtVIN1-3). B) Protein similarity tree of 12 poplar and 9 Arabidopsis neutral/alkaline invertases. The α clade (PtNIN1-6) and β clade (PtNIN7-12) are marked. PtNIN13-16 are not included. Bootstrap values are reported as a percentage of 100,000 repetitions. Branch lengths denote protein similarity.
47
A
PtCIN3
PtNIN6
PtNIN8
PtNIN9
PtNIN12
PtNIN14
PtNIN15
PtNIN1
PtNIN2
PtNIN3
PtNIN4
PtNIN5
PtCIN5
PtVIN2
PtVIN3
PtCIN4
Mat
ure
leaf
Youn
g le
af
Inte
rnod
eNo
de
Root
α
β
α
β
B PtCIN3
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
ML YL R IN N
PtVIN3
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
ML YL R IN N
PtNIN3
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
ML YL R IN N
PtNIN9
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
ML YL R IN N C
Imm
atur
e St
em
PtNIN13
Roo
t
Xyle
m
Phlo
em
Leaf
Shoo
t Tip
Cat
kin
Pre
Zygo
tic F
lora
l
Post
Zyg
otic
Flo
ral
PtCIN1
PtCIN2
Actin
PtVIN1
P. trichocarpa P. deltoides
Figure 2-3. Expression of poplar invertase genes. A) Heat map showing relative expression of poplar invertase genes in five organs. If transcript for a gene was significantly detected at an FDR of 10 % (contrasted with the array negative control probes) in at least one organ, then data from all organs was included on the heat map. Dark blue denotes high expression and light blue denotes low expression. B) RT-qPCR validation of microarray data. Relative transcript levels detected by RT-qPCR (black bars) and microarray analysis (grey bars) in mature leaves (ML), young leaves (YL), roots (R), internodes (IN), and nodes (N). In order to compare the microarray and RT-qPCR platforms, RNA was re-extracted from the same tissues used in the microarray experiment. First strand cDNA was then synthesized and used as template in the RT-qPCR reactions. The highest and lowest relative transcript estimates were assigned values of 1 and 0, respectively. Intermediate values were then adjusted relative to their difference between the highest and lowest transcript estimate. C) Expression of PtCIN1,2, PtVIN1 and PtNIN13 in various organs using cDNA generated from P. trichocarpa (vegetative organs) and P. deltoides (floral organs) as template. Contrast and resolution of images were adjusted in order to maximize visibility of bands. Actin cDNA was amplified to verify integrity of the RT-PCR template in each reaction.
48
A
AtcwIVR5AtcwIVR1 AtcwIVR5AtcwIVR1
AtcwIVR3AtcwIVR3
PtCIN5PtCIN4
24 Kb
PtVIN3PtVIN3
AtvacINV1AtvacINV1
AtvacINV2AtvacINV2
32 Kb
PtVIN2
45 Kb
AtcwIVR2
AtcwIVR4
PtCIN3PtCIN3
4 Kb4 Kb
PtCIN2 PtCIN1
22 Kb 11.6 Kb
AtcwIVR5AtcwIVR1 AtcwIVR5AtcwIVR1
AtcwIVR3AtcwIVR3
PtCIN5PtCIN4
24 Kb
PtVIN3PtVIN3
AtvacINV1AtvacINV1
AtvacINV2AtvacINV2
32 Kb
PtVIN2
45 Kb
AtcwIVR2AtcwIVR2
AtcwIVR4AtcwIVR4
PtCIN3PtCIN3
4 Kb4 Kb
PtCIN2 PtCIN1
22 Kb 11.6 Kb
NAM
Thylakoid luminalprotein related
Multicopper oxidase
Flavin containingmonoxygenase
CC-NBS-LRR classdisease resistance
3-oxoacyl-ACPsynthase III
Trehalose-6-phosphatephosphatase
Kinesin motor related
40S ribosomalprotein S9
UBQ2
F-box family Endomembrane protein 70C2H2 zinc finger family protein
PX domaincontaining protein
DEAD box RNA helicase
B
VINa
VINa
VINa
CINa
CINbCINaCINa
CINb
CINb
Chromosomal duplication Tandem duplication Chromosomal duplication
Speciation event
Poplar Arabidopsis
Tandem duplication
VINa
VINa
CINa CINb
CINb
VINa
VINa
CINa CINb
CINb
PtVIN1
PtVIN2
PtCIN4
PtCIN3
PtCIN1 PtCIN2
PtVIN3
AtvacINV1
AtvacINV2 AtcwINV1
AtcwINV6(unknownancestry)
AtcwINV2
AtcwINV4
Trans-reinsertion ofprocessed transcript
Chromosomal duplication& subsequent loss of
gene pair
AtcwINV3
AtcwINV5
PtCIN5
CINa
CINa CINa
VINa
VINa
VINa
CINa
CINbCINaCINa
CINb
CINb
Chromosomal duplication Tandem duplication Chromosomal duplication
Speciation event
Poplar Arabidopsis
Tandem duplication
VINa
VINa
CINa CINb
CINb
VINa
VINa
CINa CINb
CINb
PtVIN1
PtVIN2
PtCIN4
PtCIN3
PtCIN1 PtCIN2
PtVIN3
AtvacINV1
AtvacINV2 AtcwINV1
AtcwINV6(unknownancestry)
AtcwINV2
AtcwINV4
Trans-reinsertion ofprocessed transcript
Chromosomal duplication& subsequent loss of
gene pair
AtcwINV3
AtcwINV5
PtCIN5
CINa
CINa CINa
Figure 2-4. Evolutionary development of the poplar acid invertase family. A) Colinear chromosomal segments containing poplar invertase ORFs (checkered) and Arabidopsis invertase ORFs (solid). Conserved ORFs between chromosomal segments are depicted with identical shading; PX, phox; NAM, nuclear apical meristem; ACP, acyl carrier protein. B) Cartoon depicting hypothesized development of the acid invertase sub-family in poplar and Arabidopsis.
49
Table 2-2. Primers used in RT-qPCR and RT-PCR. Gene name Primer sequence Tm (°C) Amplicon size (base pairs)PtVIN1_RTqPCR_3' TCCTGGCCTCAAAATTTGC 58 216PtVIN1_RTqPCR_5' GCCCTGGTTCCACCTATAGTT 58PtVIN2_RTqPCR_3' CGCATCTTCGTCTTCTTGTG 57 189PtVIN2_RTqPCR_5' CCCAGCTATAGTCCTGCCC 57PtVIN3_RTqPCR_3' GCTTGGAAAATGACTCTGTAGGTC 59 197PtVIN3_RTqPCR_5' ATACACTCCCTTGCTAGACAACC 57PtCIN3_RTqPCR_3' TTGGTAGAATAGATGGTATAGCCCC 61 224PtCIN3_RTqPCR_5' TGTTAAAGTTTCTCCCAGTCTTGG 60PtNIN3_RTqPCR_3' TGGGGCGAGCATCTCCT 59 148PtNIN3_RTqPCR_5' TGCTGATGGTTTTGACATGTTC 58PtNIN8_RTqPCR_3' GTTTCAACAATGAGCAAGCG 57 211PtNIN8_RTqPCR_5' GATTTATCTCTAGCAGAAACTCCAG 56PtNIN9_RTqPCR_3' GGCATGAAGGCGTTTAGTG 56 393PtNIN9_RTqPCR_5' CACGATCCTGTCAGGAACAG 56PtNIN10_RT_PCR_3' GCTTCCCAACATATCTGCCG 60 824PtNIN10_RT_PCR_5' TCGCCCGGAGGTACAGAAT 60PtNIN13_RT_PCR_3' GCTCCCCTACATACCTGCCA 60 629PtNIN13_RT_PCR_5' TCGCCCAGAAGTGCAGAGA 60PtNIN14_RT_PCR_3' TGTTATTTAATTCAGTGAAATTCAGCA 60 334PtNIN14_RT_PCR_5' GTTCTATATGACTTGCATCGTCAAAAT 61PtNIN15_RT_PCR_3' TGTTATTTAATTGAGTGAAATTCAGCC 61 241PtNIN15_RT_PCR_5' CTCTATGACTCGCATCGTCAAAAG 61PtNIN16_RT_PCR_3' CTAGCCATGAAGGAATTTGATCTTC 61 201PtNIN16_RT_PCR_5' ATGCTCTTTGTCAATGATGGAAC 59
50
A PtCIN1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtCIN2 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtCIN3 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtCIN4 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtCIN5 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtVIN1 1 MADTSPLLPFSHSLGP-----------GSTYSSIRWRSKIVLLLVFSGLFLVPLIVSIAS PtVIN2 1 MADPSPLLPVSNSLEPSYSPAPEGAVSAGCPATHLRRSKKVLIAVFSGLLVVSLILATIN PtVIN3 1 -MDTNPSHTSSDPPYTPLLD-------NPSPARIRRPFNGFAAILASLIFLLSLVALIIN PtCIN1 1 -------------------------MMAMPHTLSVLALFALLFVLTNNGAEASHKIYSEY PtCIN2 1 --------------------------MAMPNTLSVLALFALFFVLSNNGAEASHKIYPQF PtCIN3 1 --------------------------MALLKFLPVLALFALLFVLSNNGVEASHKIYLRY PtCIN4 1 --------------------------MEILAVFLVGLCCVLQSSGIEVEALENNGCQNFQ PtCIN5 1 --------------------------MEISVIWVVGFCVLLVDHGVQASHQSSR------ PtVIN1 50 NDNGFKQHVQYLQEDDQNVSFSPPKETTKPQILRPG--SRGVSAGVSEKANVNLKGAQEK PtVIN2 61 NNN-GGRHVQYHSQEDEDASLATPKEMAKPETLLPAGYSRGVSAGVSEKANVNLKGAQVK PtVIN3 53 QSQ------ESLPEQNQNRSPSTPRPTESFSKPEPR----GVAQGVSPKSNPSFFSDKVS < * A> < B > <B1 PtCIN1 36 QTLSVENVNQVHRTGYHFQPPRHWINDPNAPMYYKGLYHLFYQYNPKGAVWG-NIVWAHS PtCIN2 35 QTLSVENVNQVHRTGYHFQPPRNWINDPNAPMYYKGLYHLFYQYNPKGAVWG-NIVWAHS PtCIN3 35 QSLSVDKVKQTHRTGYHFQPPKNWINDPNGPLYYKGLYHLFYQYNPKGAVWG-NIVWAHS PtCIN4 35 PHTVMMQEKQSYRTSFHFQPPRNWLNDPNGPMWYKGVYHLFYQYNPYGALFGDFMIWAHS PtCIN5 29 ---NLQETDQPYRTGYHFQPPKNWMNDPNGPMYYKGVYHLFYQYNPDGAVWG-NIIWAHS PtVIN1 108 GYPQNDSMLSWQRTSFHFQPEKNWMNDPNGPLYYKGWYHFFYQHNPHAAVWG-DIVWGHA PtVIN2 120 DYPWNNSMLSWQRTAFHFQPEENWMNDPNGPLYYKGWYHFFYQYNPHAAVWG-DIVWGHA PtVIN3 103 -YNWTNAMFSWQRTAYHFQPEKNWMNDPDGPLFHKGWYHLFYQYNPDSAVWG-NITWGHA > < C > PtCIN1 95 VSKDLINWESLEPAIYPSKWFDNYGCWSGSATVLPNGEPVIFYTGIVDKNNSQIQNYAVP PtCIN2 94 VSKDLINWESLEPALYPSKWFDNYGCWSGSATILPNGEPVIFYTGIADKNNSQIQNYAVP PtCIN3 94 VSKDLINWESLEPAIYPSKWFDNYGCWSGSATILPNGEPVIFYTGIVDENNRQIQNYAVP PtCIN4 95 VSYDLINWIHLNHALCPTEPYDINSCWSGSATILPGKGPVILYTGIDAN-HCQVQNMAMP PtCIN5 85 VSYDLVNWVHIDHAIYPTQPSDINGCWSGSTTILPGEKPAILYTGIDTK-NHQVQNLAVP PtVIN1 167 VSRDLINWFHLPLAIVSDEWFDINGVWTGSATILLNGKIVMLYT-GSTNESVQVQNLAYP PtVIN2 179 VSKDLIHWLHLPLAMVADKWYDKNGVWTGSATILPDGKIVMLYT-GSTNESVQVQNLAYP PtVIN3 161 VSTDLIHWLYLPFAMVPDHWYDINGVWTGSATLLPDGQIMMLYT-GSTNESVQVQNLAYP < * D> PtCIN1 155 ANLSDPYLREWVKPDDNPIVNPDANVNGSAFRDPTTAWWADG-HWRILIGSRRKHRG-VA PtCIN2 154 ANLSDPYLREWVKPDDNPIVNPDVSVNGSAFRDPTTAWWADG-HWRILIGSRRNHVG-VA PtCIN3 154 ANSSDPYLREWVKPDDNPIVYPDPSVNASAFRDPTTAWRVDG-HWRILIGSKKRDRG-IA PtCIN4 154 KNLSDPFLEEWIKFAQNPIMTPPDGVEGNNFRDPTTAWLSHDGKWSVIIGSWNNNQG-MA PtCIN5 144 KNLSDPLLKEWKKSPYNPLMTPIDGIDPDLYRDPTTAWQGPDKIWRVIVGSQINGHG-RA PtVIN1 226 ADHNDPLLLKWVKYSGNPVLVSPPGIDPNDFRDPTTAWYTSEGKWRITIGSKANNTG-IA PtVIN2 238 ADHDDPLLLKWVKYSGNPVLVPPPGIGAKDFRDPTTAWKTSEGKWRIIIGSKINKTG-IA PtVIN3 220 ANLSDPLLIDWVKYPNNPVITPPNGTETDEFRDPTTAWMGPDGTWRITIGSRHNKSIGLS
51
<* E > PtCIN1 213 YLYRSKDFKKWVKAKHPLHSVQGTGMWECPDFYPVSLSGENGLDPSVMGQNVKHVLKVSL PtCIN2 212 YLYRSRDLKKWAKTKHPLHSVQRTGMWECPDFFPVSSFGENGLDPSVNGQNVKHALKVSL PtCIN3 212 YLYRSLDFKKWFKAKHPLHSVQGTGMWECPDFFPVSLSSEDGLDTSVGGSNVRHVLKVSL PtCIN4 213 ILYRSEDFFNWTKYQDPLYSTERTGMWECPDFYPVSVNSTDGVDTSVLNAGVKHVMKASF PtCIN5 203 ILYRSKDFVNWTRIDSPLHSSGKTEMWECPDFFPVSTSSTNGVDTSSQDKSTKHVLKASF PtVIN1 285 LVYDTEDFINFKLSG-VLHGVPGTGMWECVDFYPVSKTGQNGLDTSANGPHVKHVVKTSL PtVIN2 297 LVYDTEDFINYELLSGILHGVPKTGMWECVDFYPVSKTGQNGLDTSVNGPQVKHVIKTSL PtVIN3 280 LVYQTSNFTTYELLEGVLHAVPGTGMWECVDFYPVAINGSTGLDTSAYGAGIKHVLKASL < F > PtCIN1 273 DMTRYEYYTMGTYDKKKDKYFPDEGLVDGWAGLRLDYGNFYASKTFFDPSTNRRILWGWA PtCIN2 272 DLTRYEYYTLGTYDNKKEKYFPDEGLVDGWAGLRLDYGNFYASKTFFDPSTNRRILWGWV PtCIN3 272 DLTRYEYYTIGTYDEKKDRYYPDEALVDGWAGLRYDCGNFYASKTFFDPSTNRRILWGWA PtCIN4 273 NS--HDYYMIGTYVPEIEKYIPDNDFTGTGMDLRYDHGKFYASKTFFDSVKNRRILWGWV PtCIN5 263 NH--HDYYILGSYMPENDKFSVETNFMDSGVDLRYDYGKFYASKTFFDGAMNRRILWGWI PtVIN1 344 DDVRKDSYALGTYDDKTGKWYPDNPEIDVGIGIMLDYGMFYASKTFYDQDKGRRVLWGWV PtVIN2 357 DDDRHDYYALGTYADKVGKWYPDNPEIDVGIGIRYDYGIFYASKTFYDQSKGRRVLWGWI PtVIN3 340 DDTKRDHYAIGVYDPVTDKWTPDNPKEDVGIGLQVDYGRYYASKTFYDQNTQRRILWGWI PtCIN1 333 NESDDPQKDKDKGWAGIQLIPRKVWLD-PSGKQLLQWPVAELEKLRGHNVQLSNQMLDQG PtCIN2 332 NESDAVQQDTDKGWAGILLIPRKVWLD-PSGKQLLQWPVAELEKLRGHNVQLSNQMLDQG PtCIN3 332 NESDSVQQDKNKGWAGIQLIPRRVWLD-PSGKQLLQWPVAELEKLRSHNVQLRNQKLYQG PtCIN4 331 NESDSIEDDMDKGWSGLQSIPRHIWLD-RSGKQLVQWPIEEINKLHGKKVSFLDKKIDSE PtCIN5 321 NESDSESDDIKKGWSGLQSIPRTVLLS-KNGKQIVQWPVKEIEKLRSKNVSFHDKKLKSG PtVIN1 404 AESDTEVDDVKKGWASLQGIPRTILLDTKTSSNLLQWPVEEVERLRLKGKEFNNIEVKTG PtVIN2 417 GESDSEVADVKKGWASLQGIPRTVVLDTKTGSNLLQWPVEEVESLRLKSKNFNNIEVKAG PtVIN3 400 NETDTETDDLDKGWASVQTIPRKVLYDNKTGTNILQWPVEEIEGLRLRSTDFTEIVVGPG PtCIN1 392 NHVEVKVITAAQADVDVTFSFSSLDKAEPFDPKWAKLDALDVCAQKGSKDPGGLGPFGLL PtCIN2 391 NHVEVKVITAAQADVDVTFSFSSLDKAEPFDPKWAKLDALDVCAQKGSKAPGGLGPFGLL PtCIN3 391 YHVEVKGITAAQADVDVTFSFPSLDKAEPFDPKWAKLDALDVCAQKGSKAQGGLGPFGLL PtCIN4 390 SIFEVQGITAAQADVEVVFELPELQETEFLN--LTAVDPQLLCSDANASIKGRLGPFGLL PtCIN5 380 SVLEVPGITASQADVDVSFELLNLEDAEILD--PSWTDPQLLCSQKKASVRGKLGPFGLL PtVIN1 464 SVMPLELDGATQLDIAAEFELDKKALESTAESNVDFSCSTSGG----AAQRGALGPFGLL PtVIN2 477 SAVPLELDGATQLDIVAEFELDRKAIERTAESNVEFSCSTNGG----ASHRGALGPFGLL PtVIN3 460 SVVPLDIGQATQLDIFAEFEIEIISETKHEKY------GCSGG----AVDRSALGPFGLL PtCIN1 452 TLASENLEEFTPVFFRVFKAADK-HKVLLCSDAR-------SSSLGKELYKPSFAGFVDV PtCIN2 451 TLASENLEEFTPVFFRVFKAVDK-HKVLLCSDARRFLASLNSSSLGEELYKPSFAGFVDV PtCIN3 451 TLASEKLEEFTPVFFRVFKAADK-HKVLLCSDAR-------SSSLGVGLYKPPFAGFVDV PtCIN4 448 TLATKDLTEQTAIFFRIFKGLKG-YVVLMCSDQS-------RSALRDEVDKTTYGAFIDI PtCIN5 438 AFATKDLKEQTAIYFRIFRSNHK-YIVLMCSDQS-------RSSVREELDKTTYGAFVDM PtVIN1 520 VLADDSLAEHTSVYFYVAKGNNGTHKTFFCTDQS-------RSSVANDVKKEIYGSYVPV PtVIN2 533 VLADDDLTEYTPVYFFVAKGNNGSLKTFFCTDQS-------RSSVANDVRKEIYGSYVPV PtVIN3 510 VVADQTLSELTPIFFRPVNTTEGIVETYFCADET-------RFVSQIDLLNSVYGSTVPV
52
PtCIN1 504 DLTDKKLSLRSLIDHSVVESFGAGGRIAISSRVYPTIAVFENAHLYVFNNGSETITVENL PtCIN2 510 DLTDKKLSLRSLIDHSVVESFGAGGRTAITSRVYPTIAVFEKAHLYVFNNGSETITVENL PtCIN3 503 DLTDKKLTLRSLIDHSVVESFGAGGRTVITSRVYPIIAVFDKAHLFVFNNGSETVTVETL PtCIN4 500 DPQRENISLR-SLDHSIIESFGGEGRACITNRVYPKLAIQEEARLFIFNNGTLSVTISSL PtCIN5 490 DPRHEIITLRSLIDHSIVESFGGEGRACITTRAYAKLAIHKQAYLFAFNNGTSSVKISRL PtVIN1 573 LE-GEKLSVRILVDHSIVESFAQGGRTVITSRVYPTRAIYGAARLFLFNNAIEATVTSSL PtVIN2 586 LE-GEKLSVRILVDHSIIESFAQGGRTCITSRVYPTRAIYGSARLFLFNNATEAGVTSSL PtVIN3 563 FT-DEKFQMRVLVREIDLLSFAQGGRRVITSRIYPTKAIYGDARLFLFNNATGVNVKATL PtCIN1 564 NAWSMNTPVMNVPVKS--------- PtCIN2 570 NAWSMNLPVMNVPIKNRGGENPRNE PtCIN3 563 NAWSMKVPVMNVPVKS--------- PtCIN4 559 NAWSMNKAQINHKENFI-------- PtCIN5 550 NAWSMKNAQIVSTTKRRKPHL---- PtVIN1 632 KIWQMNSAFIRRYSNEQ-------- PtVIN2 645 KIWNMNSAFIRPYSNEQQ------- PtVIN3 622 KIWELNSAFIHPFLFDQN------- B PtNIN9 1 -MSSLDGDVSQNGSLKSVDAHPALAEIEDLDFSRILDKPPRPLNMERQRSCDER-----S PtNIN11 1 -MSSINVDVSLKGSLRNAETLCDMAEIEEMDFSRIFDRPPRPLNMDRQRSCDER-----S PtNIN8 1 -----MDATKETVGLMNGSSVWSISEMDDIDFSRLSDKPK--LNIERKRSFDERSLSELS PtNIN12 1 -----MDGTKEMGGLRNVSSVCSISEMDDFDLSRLLDKPK--LNIERQRSFDERSLSELS PtNIN7 1 MSPIAAMDVCQNASVKNFEAAGSIFEIDSEFLR--LSDKPRPVNVERKRSFDERSFS--- PtNIN10 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtNIN2 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtNIN5 1 -----MRPSCRFFLSKKNRVFFNLHHSLTSNLSGNQFNFEKNKQFFTYPFRILGSRTIFK PtNIN1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtNIN3 1 -----MATSDAVLQVLSGAGPRSFSSDLCFNNLDLAFR-SKHIKYVKKRASRHMKMLECS PtNIN4 1 -----MATTEAILQVLSGAGPCVFSSDPCFRSSDLTFSSKLHIKRVKKRASRCMKMFECS PtNIN6 1 -----MATSKTVLQVLSGGLPCPHRFDLSFGGLNSVLSICSDVKRRKNIGLVYKKLNNGM PtNIN9 55 LNELFG-VPLLSPRPSSRAESNFRLIDHLDGLYSPGRRSGFN------------------ PtNIN11 55 LSELSTGLPIPSPRPSSRVENNFRLIDHLNCLPSPGRRSGFN------------------ PtNIN8 54 IGLARG-------------------IDNFETTNSPGGRSGFN------------------ PtNIN12 54 IGLARG-------------------IDTFETTYSPGGRSGFN------------------ PtNIN7 56 -------------------ENSFRIIDHLENLSPAGRRSGFN------------------ PtNIN10 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtNIN2 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtNIN5 56 EAQKSFCAPYISFGQSRLITGDFRGASIVASVASQVRKFSTSVETRVNDNNFERIYVQNG PtNIN1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtNIN3 55 SVQQNCIGKHWFKRSGDGDLSVNATIKRLQLLRCKCQKAERVSGVTTEGGNGTWFVDSAK PtNIN4 56 NVLQNGIGNHWFKGLGDRDRSVNATINRLQLLRCKGPQAERVSGVTE-GGNGTWFVDGAN PtNIN6 56 RLLGKCRSRGVG---AVTSRGKVKCIDRWESMRCKCQKAESFGGATANEWSPVSLPVNGV
53
PtNIN9 96 --------------------------------------------------TPRSQYG--F PtNIN11 97 --------------------------------------------------TPLSQFG--V PtNIN8 77 --------------------------------------------------TPASSARNSF PtNIN12 77 --------------------------------------------------TPASSTRNSF PtNIN7 79 --------------------------------------------------TPR---SCGF PtNIN10 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtNIN2 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtNIN5 116 IGIKPLVVER----------------------------------------IDKDENVLGD PtNIN1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtNIN3 115 TLNLNGAVN--TPGVLELGDTQQLMREKEVLTSNGSANKEEESLATNGAVGTGRDASRKV PtNIN4 115 TLNQNGAVTGEHTDCFGAWDAQQLTREKEGFASKAALNQEKESLATNGAVGTGRDASPKV PtNIN6 113 HG------------------------------------------ATNIFEKGSFALKGNE PtNIN9 104 ETHPAVAEAWDALRRSLVVFRGQPVGTIAALDNT-GEQLNYDQVFVRDFVPSALAFLMNG PtNIN11 105 ETHPTVAEAWEALRRSLVYFRGEPVGTIAALDNS-EEQVNYDQVFVRDFVPSALAFLMNG PtNIN8 87 EPHPMVADAWEALRRSLVFFRGQPVGTIAAYDHASEEVLNYDQVFVRDFVPSALAFLMNG PtNIN12 87 EPHPMVADAWEALRRSLVYFRGQPVGTIAAYDHASEEVLNYDQVFVRDFVPSALAFLMNG PtNIN7 86 ESHPMVVDAWESLRRTLVYFRSQPVGTIAALDHS-VEELNYDQVFVRDFVPSALAFLMNG PtNIN10 1 ----MVDEAWERLNKSYVYFKGKPVGTLAAMDTS-ADALNYNQVFVRDFVPTGLACLMKE PtNIN2 1 ------------------MYCGSPVGTVAANDPGDKMPLNYDQVFVRDFVPSALAFLLRG PtNIN5 136 EESRIGVLVDDCESVNRENLDGGQEVEIVSPKREESEIEKEAWKLLNDAVVMYCGSPVGT PtNIN1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ PtNIN3 173 SVDPTEEEAWELLRDSVVHYCGSPIGTIAANDPTSSSVLNYDQVFIRDFIPSGIAFLLKG PtNIN4 175 SVDPIEEEAWELLRNSMVYYCGSPIGTIAANDPTSSSVLNYDQVFIRDFIPSGIAFLLKG PtNIN6 131 ETQSIEEEAWDLLRASVVCYCGNPIGTIAANDPNSTSILNYDQVFIRDFIPSGIAFLLKG A PtNIN9 163 --EPEIVKNFILKTLRLQSWEKKIDRFHLGEGVMPASFKVLHDPVRNSE------TLMAD PtNIN11 164 --EPEIVKNFILKTLRLQSWEKKIDRFQLGEGVMPASFKVLHDPVTHNE------TLMAD PtNIN8 147 --EPEIVKQFLLKTLHLQGWEKRIDRFKLGEGAMPASFKVLHDPIRKTD------SLVAD PtNIN12 147 --EPDIVKHFLLKTLYLQGWEKRIDRFKLGEGAMPASFKVLHDPIRKTD------SLVAD PtNIN7 145 --EHEVVRNFLLKTLHLQSREKMVDQFKLGAGVMPASFKVLHHPDRNIE------TLMAD PtNIN10 56 PPEPEIVRNFLLKTLHLQGLEKRVDNFTLGEGVLPASFKVLYDSDLEKE------TLLVD PtNIN2 43 --EGEIVKNFLLHALQLQSWEKTVDCYSPGQGLMPASFKVRTVPLD--D-NNLEEVLDPD PtNIN5 196 --VAANDPGDKMPLNYDQSWEKTVDCYSPGQGLMPASFKVRTVPLD--D-SKFEEVLDPD PtNIN1 1 ---MEIVKNFLLHTLQLQSWEKTVDCYSPGQGLMPASFKVKTVPLDGSD-GGFEEVLDPD PtNIN3 233 --EYDIVRNFLLHTLQLQSWEKTMDCHSPGQGLMPASFKVRTFPLDGDD-SATEEVLDPD PtNIN4 235 --EYDIVRNFLLHTLQLQSWEKTMDCHSPGQGLMPASFKVRTVRLDGDDDFATEEVLDPD PtNIN6 191 --EYDIVRNFILYTLQLQSWEKTMDCYSPGQGLMPASFKVRTVPLDSED-SATEEVLDAD * B PtNIN9 215 FGESAIGRVAPVDSGFWWIFLLRAYTKSTGDTSLAEMPECQKGMRLILSLCLSEGFDTFP PtNIN11 216 FGESAIGRVAPVDSGFWWIFLLRAYTKSTGDTSLAEKPECQKGMRLILSLCLSEGFDTFP PtNIN8 199 FGESAIGRVAPVDSGFWWIILLRAYTKSTGDLSLAETPECQKGMRLILTLCLSEGFDTFP PtNIN12 199 FGESAIGRVAPVDSGFWWIILLRAYTKSTGDLSLAERPECQKGMKLILTLCLSEGFDTFP PtNIN7 197 FGESAIGRVAPVDSGFWWIILLRAYTKSTGDSSLAEMPECQRGMRLILNLCLSEGFDTFP PtNIN10 110 FGASAIGRVAPVDSGFWWIILLRSYIKRTRDYALLDRPEVQNGMKLILKLCLSDGFDTFP PtNIN2 98 FGESAIGRVAPVDSGLWWIILLRAYGKLTGDYALQERVDVQTGIKLILNLCLADGFDMFP PtNIN5 251 FGESAIGRVAPVDSGLWWIILLRAYGKLTGDYALQERVDVQTGIKLILNLCLTDGFDMFP PtNIN1 57 FGESAIGRVAPVDSGLWWIILLRAYGKITGDYALQERVDVQTGIRLGLNLCLSDGFDMFP PtNIN3 290 FGEAAIGRVAPVDSGLWWIILLRAYGKCSGDLSVQERIDVQTGIKMILRLCLADGFDMFP PtNIN4 293 FGEAAIGRVAPVDSGLWWIILLRAYGKCSGDLSLQERIDVQTGIKMILRLCLADGFDMFP PtNIN6 248 FGEAAIGRVAPVDSGLWWIILLRAYGKCSGDLSVQERVDVQTGMKMILRLCLADGFDMFP
54
C * D E F PtNIN9 275 TLLCADGCCMIDRRMGVYGYPIEIQALFFMALRCALLLLKQDEEGKEFVERITKRLHALS PtNIN11 276 TLLCADGCCMVDRRMGVYGYPIEIQALFFMALRCALLLLKQDEEGNEFVERITKRLHALS PtNIN8 259 TLLCADGCSMIDRRMGIYGYPIEIQALFFMALRSACSLLKHDEEGKECIERIVKRLHALS PtNIN12 259 TLLCADGCSMIDRRMGIYGYPIEIQALFFMALRSASSMLKHDQEGNEFIERIVKRLHALS PtNIN7 257 TLLCADGCCMIDRRMGVYGYPIEIQALFFMALRCALILLKQDDEGKEFVDRVATRLHALS PtNIN10 170 TLLCADGCSMIDRRMGIYGYPIEIQALFYFALRCAKQMLKPELDGKEFIERIEKRITALS PtNIN2 158 SLLVTDGSCMIDRRMGIHGHPLEIQALFYSALRSSREMLVVNDGSKNLVRAINNRLSALS PtNIN5 311 SLLVTDGSCMIDRRMGIHGHPLEIQ------------MIVVNDGSKNLVRAINNRLSALS PtNIN1 117 TLLVTDGSCMIDRRMGIHGHPLEIQALFYSALRCAREMLIVNDETKNLVAAINNRLSALS PtNIN3 350 TLLVTDGSCMIDRRMGIHGHPLEIQALFYSALLCAKEMLAPEDGSADLLRALNNRLVALS PtNIN4 353 TLLVTDGSCMIDRRMGIHGHPLEIQALFYSALLCAREMLAPEDGSADLIRALNNRLVALS PtNIN6 308 TLLVTDGSCMIDRRMGIHGHPLEIEALFYSALLCAREMLAPEDGSADLIRALNNRLVALS G H IJ PtNIN9 335 FHMRSYYWIDLKQLNDIYRYKTEEYSHTAVNKFNVIPDSLPEWIFDFMPVHGGYFIGNVS PtNIN11 336 FHMRSYYWIDLKQLNDIYRYKTEEYSHTAVNKFNVIPDSLPEWIFDFMPVRGGYFIGNVS PtNIN8 319 YHMRSYFWLDFQQLNDIYRYKTEEYSHTAVNKFNVIPDSIPDWVFDFMPTRGGYFIGNVS PtNIN12 319 YHMRSYFWLDFQQLNDIYRYKTEEYSHTAVNKFNVIPDSIPDWVFDFMPIRGGYFIGNVS PtNIN7 317 YHMRNYFWLDMKQLNDIYRYKTEEYSHTAVNKFNVMPDSLPDWVFDFMPTRGGYFIGNVS PtNIN10 230 YHIQTYYWLDFTQLNNIYRYKTEEYSHTAVNKFNVIPESIPDWVFDFMPLRGGYLIGNVS PtNIN2 218 FHIREYYWVDMRKINEIYRYKTEEYSTEATNKFNIYPEQIPSWLMDWIPEEGGYLIGNLQ PtNIN5 359 FHIREYYWVDMNKINVIYRYKTEEYSTEATNKFNIYPEQIPSWLMDWIPEEGGYLIGNLQ PtNIN1 177 FHIREYYWVDMRKINEIYRYNTEEYSTDAVNKFNIYPDQIPSWLVDWIPEEGGYLIGNLQ PtNIN3 410 FHIREYYWIDLRKLNEIYRYKTEEYSYDAVNKFNIYPDQVSPWLVEWMPNQGGYLIGNLQ PtNIN4 413 FHIREYYWIDLRKLNEIYRYKTEEYSYDAVNKFNIYPDQISPWLVEWMPNQGGYLIGNLQ PtNIN6 368 FHIREYYWIDLKKLNEIYRYTTEEYSYDAVNKFNIYPDQIPPWLVEFMPNKGGYLIGNLQ K PtNIN9 395 PAKMDFRWFCLGNCIAILSSLATPEQSTAIMDLIESRWEELVGEMPLKVIYPAIESHEWR PtNIN11 396 PARMDFRWFCLGNCIAILSSLATPEQSTAIMDLIESRWEELVGEMPLKVIYPAIESHEWR PtNIN8 379 PARMDFRWFALGNCIAILSSLATHEQAMAIMDLIEARWEELVGEMPLKIAYPAIESHEWR PtNIN12 379 PARMDFRWFALGNCIAILSSLATHEQAMAIMDLIEARWEELVGEMPLKIAYPAIESHEWR PtNIN7 377 PARMDFRWFCLGNCVAILSSLATPEQASAIMDLIESRWEELVGEMPLKICYPALESHEWR PtNIN10 290 PARMDFRWFLVGNCVAILSSLVTPAQATAIMDLVEERWEDLIGEMPLKITYPALEGHEWR PtNIN2 278 PAHMDFRFFTLGNLWSVVSSLGTPKQNEAVLNLIESKWDDLVGNMPLKICYPALESEDWR PtNIN5 419 PAHMDFRFFTLGNLWSVISSLGTPKHNEAILNLIEAKWDDLVGNMPLKICYPALEHEDWR PtNIN1 237 PAHMDFRFFTLGNLWAIVSSLGTSKQNEGILNLIEARWDDLMGHMPLKICYPALEYEEWR PtNIN3 470 PAHMDFRFFSLGNIWSVVSGLATRDQSNAILDLIEAKWSDLVADMPLKICYPALEGQEWQ PtNIN4 473 PAHMDFRFFSLGNIWSIVSGLATRDQSNAILDFIEAKWSDLIADMPLKICYPALEGQEWQ PtNIN6 428 PAHMDFRFFTLGNLWSIVSSLATLDQSHAILDLIEAKWAELVAEMPIKICYPALEGQEWR L M PtNIN9 455 IVTGCDPKNTRWSYHNGGSWPVLLWLLTAACIKTGRPQIARRAIELAETRLVKDNWPEYY PtNIN11 456 IVTGCDPKNTRWSYHNGGSWPVLLWLLTAACIKTGRPQIARRAIELAETRLIKDNWPEYY PtNIN8 439 IVTGCDPKNTRWSYHNGGSWPVLLWLLTAACIKTGRPQIARKAIDLAETRLLKDSWPEYY PtNIN12 439 IVTGCDPKNTRWSYHNGGSWPVLLWLLTAACIKTGRPQIARKAIDLAETRLLKDGWPEYY PtNIN7 437 TVTGCDPKNTRWSYHNGGSWPVLLWLLTAACIKTGRPQIARRAIELAESRLSKDHWPEYY PtNIN10 350 LVTGFDPKNTRWSYHNGGSWPMLLWLLSAACIKVGRPQIAKRAIELAEQRLSKDGWPEYY PtNIN2 338 IITGSDPKNTPWSYHNGGSWPTLLWQFTLACMKMDRMELAQKAIALAEKRLQVDHWPEYY PtNIN5 479 IITGSDPKNTPWSYHNGGSWPTLLWQFTLACIKMNRVELAQKAIALAEKRLQVDHWPEYY PtNIN1 297 IITGSDPKNTPWSYHNGGSWPTLLWQFTLACIKMGKPELAQKAIALAETRLSMDQWPEYY PtNIN3 530 IITGSDPKNTPWSYHNAGSWPTLLWQLTVACIKMNRPEIAARAVDIAEKRISRDKWPEYY PtNIN4 533 IITGSDPKNTPWSYHNAGSWPTLLWQLTAACIKMNRPELAARAVEIAEKRISRDKWPEYY PtNIN6 488 IVTGSDPKNTAWSYHNGGSWPTLLWQLTVACIKMNRPEIAERAVQLVERRISRDKWPEYY
55
N O PtNIN9 515 DGKLGRFVGKQARKFQTWSIAGYLVAKMLLEDPSHLGMVALEEDKQMKPPMRRSHSWTF- PtNIN11 516 DGKLGRFIGKQARKSQTWSIAGYLVAKMMLEDPSHLGTVALEEDKQMKPPIRRSNSWT-- PtNIN8 499 DGKLGRYIGKQARKYQTWSIAGYLVAKMMLEDPSHLGMISLEEDKQMNPVLKRSSSWTC- PtNIN12 499 DGKLGRYVGKQARKYQTWSIAGYLVAKMMLEDPSHLGMISLEEDRQMKPVLRRSSSWTC- PtNIN7 497 DGKLGLYVGKQARKFQTWSIAGYLVAKMMLEDPSHLGMISLEEDKQITHLVKRSASWTC- PtNIN10 410 DGKTGRYVGKQARKYQTWSIAGYLVAKMMVENPSNLLMISLEEDKKSARSRLTRSNSTSF PtNIN2 398 DTRSGKFIGKQSRLYQTWTVAGFLTSKVLLENPEKASLLFWDEDYDLLEFCVCGLNTSGR PtNIN5 539 DTRTGKFIGKQSRLYQTWTVAGFLTSKILLENPQRASLLFWDEDYELLEICVCGLNTSGR PtNIN1 357 DTRSGRFIGKQSRLFQTWTISGFLTSKMLLENPDKASLLFLEEDYELLEICVCALSKTGR PtNIN3 590 DTKKARFIGKQARLFQTWSIAGYLVAKLLLADPSAARMLVTDEDPELVNAFSCMISSNPR PtNIN4 593 DTKKARFIGKQAHLFQTWSIAGYLVAKLLLADPSAARMLVMDEDPELVSAFSCMISTHPR PtNIN6 548 DTKRARFIGKQAHLFQTWSISGYLVAKLFLANPSAAKIFVNEEDPELVN---ALISANPR PtNIN9 -------------- PtNIN11 -------------- PtNIN8 -------------- PtNIN12 -------------- PtNIN7 -------------- PtNIN10 470 -------------- PtNIN2 458 KRCSRVAARSQILV PtNIN5 599 KRCSRGAAKSQILV PtNIN1 417 KKCSRFAARSQILV PtNIN3 650 RKRGQKNSKKPFIV PtNIN4 653 RNRGQKNSKKTFMV PtNIN6 605 RKRARKIFKQPFIV Figure 2-5. Amino acid alignment of poplar invertases. A) Amino acid alignment of acid
invertases. Black shading corresponds to identical residues, grey shading corresponds to similar residues. A-F denote highly conserved motifs as defined by Pons et al. (1998) which are thought to play roles in activity. Asterisks mark completely conserved residues thought to be involved in substrate binding or catalysis (Alberto et al. 2004). B) Amino acid alignment of neutral/alkaline invertases. A-O correspond to amino acids that are consistently different between α and β group invertases. Asterisks show amino acids most likely to correspond to active residues for neutral/alkaline invertases, assuming equivalence with the catalytic residues of unsaturated glucuronyl hydrolase (UGL) from Bacillus sp. (Itoh et al. 2004). Black shading corresponds to identical residues, grey shading corresponds to similar residues. Alignment produced with CLUSTALW and figure produced with BOXSHADE.
56
CHAPTER 3 RECIPROCAL SUGAR REGULATION IS CONSERVED AMONG VACUOLAR
INVERTASES OF POPLAR, ARABIDOPSIS, MAIZE AND RICE
Introduction
Sugars play an essential role in plant cell growth and development as they act as fuel for
metabolism, generate osmotic pressure for short and long distance transport and act as signaling
molecules for various metabolic pathways (Koch, 1996; Rolland et al., 2002; Halford and Paul,
2003). Sucrose is the primary form of sugar transport in most plants, establishing this
disaccharide and its glucose and fructose cleavage products as central to plant growth and
development.
Invertase (EC 3.2.1.26), also known as β-fructofuranosidase, irreversibly hydrolyzes
sucrose into glucose and fructose, and is positioned to play a central role in both carbon
metabolism and sugar signaling. Several invertase isozymes have been identified from plant
species as either soluble (readily extractable from cytosol or vacuole), or insoluble (bound to cell
wall components). Vacuolar and cell wall invertases show optimal activity at an acidic pH and
are also called acid invertases. The mature acid invertases are glycosylated and located in the
cellular compartment their name implies (e.g. cell wall or vacuolar).
Vacuolar invertases (VIN), like their cell wall localized family members, are thought to
have evolved from respiratory eukaryotes and aerobic bacteria (Sturm and Chrispeels, 1990a).
VINs have been identified and characterized to various levels in many different plant species
including, but not limited to, Arabidopsis, carrot, maize, poplar, rice, tobacco and tomato
(Tymowska-Lalanne and Kreis, 1998b; Ji et al., 2005; Bocock et al., 2007). To my knowledge,
with the exception of poplar (containing three), all plants studied to date encode only two VINs.
Of poplar’s three VINs, one contains no introns and is thought to be a recent evolutionary
57
innovation stemming from a processed transcript inserted in trans back into the genome (Bocock
et al., 2007).
VIN transcripts have been found to be reciprocally regulated by sugar. In maize, Ivr1 was
found to be transcriptionally repressed after treatment with exogenous glucose under the same
conditions that induced transcription of Ivr2 (Xu et al., 1996). In tomato, the VIN, TIV1, was also
found to be repressed after treatment with exogenous sugar, however, induction of the second
tomato VIN under the same conditions was not shown (Godt and Roitsch, 1997a).
An important driver of species origination and diversification is gene duplication.
Duplication makes it possible for a gene to acquire new functions without losing that of the
progenitor gene (Kramer et al., 1998; Lynch and Conery, 2000; Sankoff, 2001; Becker and
Theissen, 2003; Irish, 2003; Litt and Irish, 2003; Zahn et al., 2005). Gene duplication can occur
in tandem, through the duplication of a chromosomal segment, an entire chromosome, or through
genome duplication (Otto and Whitton, 2000; Wendel, 2000; Adams and Wendel, 2005).
Genome duplications give rise to copies of linked genes in a particular order that can be used to
infer ancestry of loci of interest both within and between species (Lynch and Conery, 2000).
Poplar, Arabidopsis, maize and rice are all known to have undergone multiple genome
duplication events in their evolutionary history. Poplar and Arabidopsis have each undergone a
genome duplication event that post-dates their divergence on the evolutionary tree (Bowers et
al., 2003; Sterck et al., 2005; Tuskan et al., 2006). Poplar and Arabidopsis also share at least two
genome duplication events that pre-date their evolutionary divergence and are referred to as the β
and γ genome duplication events (Bowers et al., 2003; De Bodt et al., 2005; Tuskan et al., 2006).
On the monocot side of the evolutionary tree, maize is known to have undergone two genome
duplication events, one post- and the other pre-dating its divergence with rice (Blanc and Wolfe,
58
2004). The γ event referred to previously is thought to have occurred prior to the monocot-
eudicot divergence. Some evidence suggests that the γ event may even pre-date the gymnosperm
divergence, although this conclusion requires more data (Bowers et al., 2003). The timing and
location of genomic duplication events can be utilized to understand the evolutionary
development of a variety of gene families.
In this work, the sequenced genomes of poplar, Arabidopsis, and rice are compared in
order to test possible scenarios for the evolutionary development of the VIN family. I also take
advantage of the unique reciprocal sugar regulation that occurs in this family to analyze the
functional conservation of VIN in monocots and eudicots. This evidence indicates that the two
VINs so common throughout the plant world arose at, or prior to the γ genome duplication event.
I also examined the reciprocal sugar response in Pinus taeda, a gymnosperm, but was unable to
validate the presence of this reciprocal response.
Materials and Methods
Plant Material
Populus trichocarpa (genotype “Nisqually-1”) and Pinus taeda were grown in 8 L pots in
a fan- and pad-cooled greenhouse with natural light augmented with full spectrum fluorescent
lighting during the winter to give a day length of 15 h. Greenhouse temperatures ranged from 20-
35 °C. At noon, light intensity in the greenhouse averaged 500-700 µE/m2/min PAR, which is
one-half the light intensity outside the greenhouse. Plants were grown on an ebb-and-flow flood
bench system with a daily supply of Peters Professional® 20-10-20 water-soluble fertilizer
diluted to a final concentration of 4 mM nitrogen. Plants were grown to a height of 60-100 cm
prior to experimentation.
Arabidopsis plant material was prepared as described by Huang (2006). Briefly,
Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) seeds were sterilized and soaked in water for 4-5 d at 4°C in the
59
dark. Seeds were sown on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium, pH 5.8
(GIBCOBRL, U.S.A.) solidified with 0.16% (w/v) phytagel. The typical sugar supplement for
enhanced plant growth was omitted. Plantlets were cultured under cycles of 12 h light/dark at 25
°C. All plant material was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen after harvesting, and stored at –
80 °C prior to RNA extraction.
Sequence Alignments and Similarity Trees
Predicted amino acid sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW
(http://clustalw.genome.jp) to construct similarity trees using the TREEVIEW program (Page,
1996). PAUP (Swofford, 1993) was used for bootstrap analysis with 100,000 iterations.
RNA Extraction
Total RNA was extracted from poplar and pine leaves using standard methods (Chang,
1993), DNase-treated and purified on RNAeasy QIAGEN columns (Valencia, CA). Total RNA
was extracted from Arabidopsis plants and rice embryos using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit
(QIAGEN) and DNase treated (DNA-free Kit, Ambion, Austin, TX) according to manufacturers’
instructions.
Quantitative RT-PCR in Poplar and Pine
Poplar and pine cDNA was synthesized from purified RNA (5 μg) using a mixture of 500
ng oligo-dT, 100 ng random primers, and M-MLV-RT as per manufacturer’s instructions
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), with the exception that the DTT was excluded. Gene expression was
analyzed using the SYBR Green kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and Mx3000P thermo-cycler
(Stratagene) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 1 μl of synthesized cDNA and 0.15 μl of
a 0.25 μM solution of each primer were used for each 50 μl RT-qPCR reaction. Primers were
designed using NetPrimer (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA) software and
synthesized by Invitrogen. Primer sequences are as follows: PtVIN1 forward, 5’-
60
GCCCTGGTTCCACCTATAGTT-3’; reverse, 5’-TCCTGGCCTCAAAATTTGC-3’ (yields 216
bp product); PtVIN2 forward, 5’-CCCAGCTATAGTCCTGCCC-3’; reverse, 5’-
CGCATCTTCGTCTTCTTGTG-3’ (yields 189 bp product); PtVIN3 forward, 5’-
ATACACTCCCTTGCTAGACAACC-3’; reverse, 5’-GCTTGGAAAATGACTCTGTAGGTC-
3’(yields 197 bp product); PtaedaVIN1 forward, 5’-TGATTCCCGACCGCTGG-3’; reverse, 5’-
ATTAGCCTCCGACTTCACCC-3’ (yields 185 bp product); PtaedaVIN2 forward, 5’-
GGGCTGCGGTATGATTATGG-3’; reverse, 5’-CTGGAGCAGCACATTCTCG-3’ (yields 261
bp product). Each real-time PCR reaction was performed in triplicate (technical replicates) on
four individual plants (biological replicates) in poplar and six individual plants in pine and
carried out for 40 cycles with annealing, extension, and melting temperatures of 55 °C, 72 °C,
and 95 °C, respectively. Melting curves were generated to check the specificity of the amplified
fragments. In the case of PtVIN2, an extension temperature of 79 °C with the fluorescence
reading taken at the end of the run was used to correct for a spurious primer-dimer amplicon.
Changes (n-fold) in gene expression relative to the geometric mean (Vandesompele et al., 2002)
of three control genes encoding actin, ubiquitin and ubiquitin_L (Brunner et al., 2004) were
determined using the program DART-PCRv1.0 (Peirson et al., 2003).
Quantitative RT-PCR in Arabidopsis
Real time quantitative RT-PCR in Arabidopsis was conducted as described by Huang
(2006). Briefly, 200 ng of RNA were used in 25 μl reactions with Taq-Man one-step RT-PCR
Master Mix reagents (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) according to manufacturer’s
instructions.
61
Sugar Treatments for Poplar, Arabidopsis, Pine and Rice
Mature leaves (LPI 12) from four greenhouse grown poplars (biological replicates, one leaf
per plant, n=4) were covered in aluminum foil for three to five days. Leaves were then excised
and taken to a dark room where aluminum foil was removed. Leaves were lightly rubbed with a
carborundum suspension to remove the cuticle and subsequently cut in half (lengthwise). The
two leaf halves were placed in 1 % (w/v) mannitol (negative control) and 1 % (w/v) glucose,
respectively, and incubated in the dark at room temperature on a shaker. After a 16 h incubation
period, leaves were frozen in liquid nitrogen and RNA extracted.
Sugar treatments in Arabidopsis were conducted on two week old plants that were placed
in the dark for three days, after which they were transferred to 1/2 strength liquid MS minimal
media supplemented with 1 % (w/v) mannitol or glucose and incubated in the dark at room
temperature on a shaker. After a 16 h incubation period, plants were harvested.
Greenhouse grown Pinus taeda branches containing fully mature needles were wrapped in
aluminum foil for five days. Branches were then excised and taken to a dark room where
aluminum foil was removed. Needles were removed and then lightly rubbed with a carborundum
suspension to remove the cuticle. Needles from a single branch were then divided in half
between solutions of 1 % (w/v) mannitol and 1 % (w/v) glucose, respectively, and incubated in
the dark at room temperature on a shaker. After a 16 h incubation period, needles were frozen in
liquid nitrogen and RNA extracted. Needles were used from six different plants (biological
replicates, n=6).
Light-Dark Treatments for Poplar, Pine and Arabidopsis
Mature leaves (LPI 12) from four greenhouse grown poplars (biological replicates, n=4)
were covered in aluminum foil for five days. After the fifth day, half of the leaves were
uncovered and exposed to sunlight for approximately 5 h. At noon, wrapped and exposed leaves
62
were harvested and RNA extracted. Greenhouse grown Pinus taeda branches containing fully
mature needles from six plants (biological replicates, n=6) were wrapped in aluminum foil for
five days. After the fifth day, half of the branches were uncovered and exposed to sunlight for
approximately 5 h. At noon, needles from the wrapped and exposed branches were harvested and
the RNA extracted. Treatments in Arabidopsis were conducted on two week old plants that were
placed in the dark for three days, after which half were exposed to light for approximately 5 h
before plants were harvested and RNA extracted.
Results
Predicting Gene Orthology Using Protein Sequence Similarity
The hypothesis that the reciprocal regulation of VIN, first identified in the maize VINs Ivr1
(ZmIVR1) and Ivr2 (ZmIVR2),(Xu et al., 1996) is conserved not only in monocots, but also in
eudicots was tested. To my knowledge, all plants studied to date contain two VINs, with the
exception of poplar, which contains three. Poplar’s PtVIN1 is thought to be a very recent
innovation specific to poplar since it has no introns and likely arose through a processed
transcript of PtVIN2 inserting into the genome in trans (Bocock et al., 2007). I predict that the
poplar VINs PtVIN2 and -3 (not PtVIN1) are the likely othologs of ZmIVR1 and -2. Arabiodopsis
and rice both contain only two VINs and are referred to here as AtvacIVR1, AtvacIVR2, OsVIN1
and OsVIN2, respectively (Haouazine-Takvorian et al., 1997; Ji et al., 2005).
Nucleotide and protein sequences were obtained from the various databases (Joint Genome
Institute, poplar; NCBI, Arabidopsis and maize; TIGR, rice and maize). I then translated the
nucleotide sequences and constructed amino acid alignments between the four species (data not
shown). I discovered that ZmIVR2 (accession # CAD91358) as it exists in NCBI, is missing
information on the N-terminal end. In order to obtain more complete sequence, I searched the
TIGR Maize database. I found that ZmIVR2 corresponds to TIGR contig AZM5_84630.
63
Subsequent analysis of the contig in GENESCAN (http://genes.mit.edu/GENSCAN.html) (Burge
and Karlin, 1997) allowed me to identify an additional 42 amino acids on the N-terminal end.
Based on amino acid alignments with the other VINs, I estimate that there are still roughly 140
amino acids missing from the N-terminal end (data not shown).
To obtain VIN sequences for pine, I searched for Pinus taeda ESTs on NCBI using
AtvacIVR1 and -2 as queries. The ESTs were then aligned and assembled using the Sequencher
program (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI). This technique resulted in two, distinct contigs referred
to hereafter as PtaedaVIN1 and PtaedaVIN2. The lack of a third contig resulting from the
assembled ESTs indicates that pine, like the other plant species mentioned above, encodes only
two VINs. The nucleotide sequences were translated into amino acid sequences and protein
alignments revealed that PtaedaVIN1 and -2 are missing roughly 130 and 270 amino acids from
their N-terminal ends, respectively (data not shown).
The amino acid sequences were then analyzed in an attempt to identify the vacuolar
orthologs between species. As can be seen in Table 3-1, OsVIN1 and ZmIVR1 appear to be
orthologs as they are more similar to each other (82 % similarity) than they are to their family
members within each species. This pattern is repeated between OsVIN2 and ZmIVR2 (88 %
similarity) indicating that these two genes are also orthologous, based on sequence similarity. In
the case of poplar, Arabidopsis and pine, orthology cannot be determined. In Arabidopsis and
pine, the VINs are most similar to their family member within the species rather than their
putative orthologs in other species. In contrast, the poplar VINs in comparison to each other are
less similar than compared to any other VIN (Table 3-1).
These alignments were then used to generate a bootstrapped protein similarity tree (Figure
3-1). As expected from percent similarity, OsVIN1 and ZmIVR1 cluster together as do OsVIN2
64
and MzIVR2. However, the poplar, Arabidopsis and pine VINs tend to cluster within each
species rather than with their orthologs (Figure 3-1). Using this data, it was predicted that
ZmIVR1 and OsVIN1 are orthologs whose transcripts are sugar repressed while ZmIVR2 and
OsVIN2 encode sugar induced transcripts. It is not straightforward to predict orthology between
poplar, Arabidopsis and pine using this approach due to the lack of obvious pairwise clustering
of protein sequences among species.
A Chromosome Duplication Event is Responsible for the Two-Member VIN Family in Poplar and Arabidopsis
Large scale chromosomal or genome duplications are responsible for the growth of many
gene families (Sankoff, 2001). Chromosomal segments arising from genome duplication events
often retain a conserved linear order of loci. Conservation of loci order on a chromosomal
segment is not only evidence of gene family expansion through large scale chromosomal
duplication, but it also can serve as another method to be used in predicting orthology, and
therefore function. Figure 3-2A depicts the locations of several putative large scale or genomic
chromosomal duplications overlayed on an evolutionary tree outlining the development of
poplar, Arabidopsis, maize, pine and rice.
In a previous work, I examined the chromosomal segments containing the VINs in poplar
and Arabidopsis and identified neighboring open reading frames (ORF) that were used to
establish colinearity between the species (Bocock et al., 2007). In summary, I showed that poplar
and Arabidopsis VINs lie within conserved, colinear chromosomal segments (Figure 3-2B)
(Bocock et al., 2007). These data indicate that a chromosomal duplication event is responsible
for the development of the two-member VIN family in poplar and Arabidopsis. Conservation of
colinearity between the two species indicates that the duplication event must have occurred prior
to poplar and Arabidopsis divergence, likely in duplication event β or γ (Figure 3-2A).
65
I hypothesized that the duplication event giving rise to the two member VIN family
occurred prior to the eudicot and monocot divergence, which would explain the conserved two
member VIN family size in maize and rice. To address this question, I examined the
chromosomal segments containing the VINs in maize and rice to identify neighboring ORFs that
could be used to establish colinearity between maize, rice and the eudictos. Unfortunately, I was
unsuccessful in identifying neighboring ORFs in maize as the contigs containing ZmIVR1 and -2
were not large enough to contain any ORFs other than the VINs. In rice, I was able to identify
numerous ORFs upstream and downstream of OsVIN1 and -2 and compare these to the eudicots.
No evidence of colinearity was found between rice and the eudicots. This finding does not
support the hypothesis, however it also does not necessarily contradict the hypothesis as it is
quite common for small insertions, deletions and rearrangements to occur subsequent to genome
duplication events (Sankoff, 2001). If the VINs truly arose from the γ event, then there have been
approximately 221-300+ million years (Blanc and Wolfe, 2004) for rearrangements to occur and
obscure the duplication event.
Sugar Response Demonstrates Conservation of Gene Function in VINs
Based on amino acid sequence similarity, I hypothesized that OsVIN1 and ZmIVR1 are
orthologs and likely retain the same transcript repression to exogenous sugar. Similarly, I
predicted OsVIN2 and ZmIVR1 to be orthologous and retain the same transcript induction to
exogenous sugar. In poplar and Arabidopsis, the link is a bit more confusing. I was able to use
conservation of colinearity to establish chromosomal duplication as the likely originator of the
two VINs, however I was unable to use it to establish orthology.
I next examined the response of the VINs to exogenous sugar treatment to address the
above questions. Leaves from greenhouse-grown poplars were wrapped in foil for approximately
three to five days in order to clear the leaves of any carbohydrate reserves. The leaves were then
66
excised, treated with a suspension of carborundum to remove the cuticle, and incubated
overnight in solutions of either 1 % mannitol (to serve as an osmotic and wounding control) or
glucose in the dark. Transcripts for PtVIN1,2 and -3 were then assayed. I found that, like
ZmIVR1, transcripts for PtVIN2 were repressed in the presence of sugar (Figure 3-4A).
Transcripts for PtVIN3 were induced in the presence of sugar (data not shown). PtVIN1, the
intronless poplar invertase discussed earlier showed no sugar response at all. Transcripts for
PtVIN1 were also found to be two orders of magnitude less abundant than its presumed
progenitor, PtVIN2 (data not shown). I speculate that PtVIN1 lost at least some of the regulatory
features of PtVIN2 when it re-inserted into the genome.
Huang (2006) examined Arabidopsis plants for this sugar response. Whole plants grown on
sugar free media were transferred to the dark for approximately three days to clear the
carbohydrate reserves. The plants were then transferred to 1 % mannitol or glucose in the dark.
After incubation in the solutes, transcripts for AtvacIVR1 and -2 were assayed. Similar to
ZmIVR1 and PtVIN2, transcripts for AtvacIVR2 were found to be repressed (Figure 3-4A).
AtvacIVR1 was found to be induced under these conditions (data not shown).
In a similar fashion, Huang (unpublished data) treated rice embryos with 3 % sucrose,
which in poplar, Arabidopsis and maize incurs the same VIN response as glucose (data not
shown). OsVIN1 transcripts were found to be down-regulated as expected from OsVIN1’s
similarity to ZmIVR1 (Figure 3-4A).
Reciprocal Response in Light
Exogenous sugar treatments serve as an in vitro assay to mimic photosynthesis conditions
in vivo by recreating the high sugar environments associated with active photosynthesis. I
hypothesized that the VINs repressed by sugar would also be repressed by light, while the sugar
induced VINs would be induced by light. Leaves of greenhouse grown poplar were covered for
67
three to five days to clear the leaves of any starch reserves. Half of the foil covered leaves were
then uncovered and exposed to light. At noon on the same day, the covered and light exposed
leaves were harvested and transcripts associated with PtVIN2 and -3 were assayed. Similarly,
Arabidopsis plants grown on ½ strength MS media lacking sugars were placed in the dark for
three to five days. Half of the plants were then moved to the light and allowed to photosynthesize
for approximately 5 h. The plants were then harvested and transcripts for AtvacIVR1 and -2 were
assayed. As expected, light was found to repress transcripts for PtVIN2 and AtvacIVR2 while
inducing transcripts for PtVIN3 and AtvacIVR1 (Figure 3-3).
Discussion
In this study, I utilized newly released sequence information to establish orthology
between VINs in poplar, Arabidopsis, maize, pine and rice. I was able to establish clear orthology
between ZmIVR1 and OsVIN1 as well as ZmIVR2 and OsVIN2 using available nucleotide data,
however establishing orthology between the other species proved more difficult.
Through an examination of gene colinearity on chromosomal segments encoding the VIN
loci, I was able to establish that a chromosomal duplication gave rise to the two-member VIN
family in poplar and Arabidopsis. I was unable to establish conservation of colinearity between
the eudicots and rice, however a lack of sequence information from maize made it impossible to
compare the two monocots. The fact that the maize and rice genomes both appear to encode only
two VINs makes it likely that the chromosome duplication event giving rise to the two VINs in
the eudicots occurred prior to the eudicot-monocot divergence in the γ event. Convergent
evolution in the monocots could serve as an alternate explanation for the appearance of the two-
member VIN family in the monocots. This can only be ruled out by identifying a conservation of
colinearity on the VIN chromosomal regions between rice and another monocot, such as maize or
sorghum, as more genomic sequence becomes available. The grasses retain considerable
68
conservation of colinearity (Bennetzen and Ma, 2003), so it is not unreasonable to expect that the
predicted colinear regions will be identified.
It will be more difficult to test colinearity between the eudicot lines and those of the
monocot lines due to the extent of time and evolutionary change since their divergence. The
conservation of function described in this paper, however does go a long way in establishing
orthology between the monocot and eudicot VINs. While the conservation of reciprocal sugar
response cannot rule out the explanation of convergent evolution, the likelihood that only two
VIN family members would be encoded by such a diverse array of plant genomes and also retain
the same functions for such a long evolutionary time frame makes the convergent evolution
hypothesis extremely unlikely.
This work also describes the identification of two EST contigs from the gymnosperm,
Pinus taeda, that are highly similar to previously described VINs in other species. I name these
two contigs PtaedaVIN1 and PtaedaVIN2. These two putative VINs had good EST coverage for
nearly the entire coding region. As I was unable to find any ESTs that assembled into a third VIN
contig, I believe that PtaedaVIN1 and -2 are either the only two VINs encoded by the Pinus taeda
genome, or, at the very least, the only two significantly expressed VINs in this species. In order
to identify conservation of VIN function between the gymnosperms and angiosperms, I
conducted the all the same sugar and light/dark experiments as done for poplar and Arabidopsis.
I was unable to identify the same reciprocal response that was seen in poplar and Arabdidopsis.
It is unclear whether this is because the P. taeda VINs do not have the reciprocal regulation
feature as do the angiosperms, or that conditions tested did not effectively reveal these responses.
The possibility remains that additional experimentation could define a differential sugar
responsiveness in pine under somewhat different conditions.
69
In this study, I show that the reciprocal sugar regulation of VINs first identified in maize
(Xu et al., 1996) is conserved in at least three eudicot species. Sugar treatments were conducted
on poplar and Arabidopsis and demonstrate the reciprocal response in these two species. I also
demonstrate that sugar repressed OsVIN1 transcripts, as predicted based on its sequence
similarity to the sugar-repressed ZmIVR1. A search of the literature also revealed that TIV1, one
of tomato’s two vacuolar invertases is also repressed after treatment with glucose (Godt and
Roitsch, 1997a). Collectively, these data help to establish this sugar response as highly conserved
throughout plants.
Poplar and Arabidopsis plants were subjected to a light/dark experiment intended to mimic
the exogenous sugar treatment experiments. The purpose of this is two-fold. First, demonstrating
a commonality between exogenous sugar applications and light treatments helps to establish the
sugar-induced VINs as “feast” genes. Feast genes are those that are induced in response to sugars
and are thought to play roles in storage processes and carbon utilization. These genes would also
be up-regulated in actively photosynthesizing cells (Koch, 1996). This helps us to place these
sugar up-regulated genes in a more general context regarding their role in plant growth and
development. The second purpose of establishing the commonality of transcript response
between the light/dark treatment and the exogenous sugar treatment would be the ease of the
assay. For plants that are less amenable to experimental manipulation than poplar and
Arabidopsis, the light/dark treatment provides another tool for testing the reciprocal VIN
response.
Advances in genome sequencing are rapidly increasing available genomic sequence. This
abundance of data is allowing new types of questions to be asked as well as application of
functional data to the larger story of plant evolution. In this study of the VIN gene family, I have
70
added to our knowledge of the response of VINs to sugar and light treatments. I have tied this
into a larger, evolutionary story and discussed how this gene family has developed with the
evolution of plants. Hopefully this work has achieved its goal of aiding our understanding of how
plants process and utilize carbohydrates obtained through photosynthesis.
71
Table 3-1. Percent similarity of predicted VINs from poplar, Arabidopsis, rice and maize. Protein names are in bold with the corresponding gene model names below.
PtVIN2 PtVIN3 AtvacIVR1 AtvacIVR2 OsVIN1 OsVIN2 MzIVR1 MzIVR2 PtaedaVIN1 PtaedaVIN2PtVIN2 69 77 76 77 69 72 76 74 74estExt_fgenesh4_pg.C_LG_III0902PtVIN3 69 71 71 67 71 70 71 70estExt_Genewise1_v1.C_LG_XV2841AtvacIVR1 85 70 67 69 71 73 71At1g62660AtvacIVR2 70 70 69 72 73 71At1g12240OsVIN1 77 82 76 74 73Os04g45290.1OsVIN2 74 88 70 69Os02g01590MzIVR1 76 73 75P49175MzIVR2 69 70AZM5_84630PtaedaVIN1 89
PtaedaVIN2
72
AtvacIVR2 AtvacIVR1
PtVIN2
PtVIN3
OsVIN1
OsVIN2
ZmIVR1
ZmIVR2PtaedaVIN2
PtaedaVIN1
100
100
100
100
9886
91
Figure 3-1. Protein similarity tree of VINs. Bootstrap values are reported as a percentage of
100,000 repetitions. Branch lengths denote protein similarity with the exception of ZmIVR2, PtaedaVIN1 and -2 where the first ~140-230 amino acids have not yet been sequenced.
73
A
Poplar Arabidopsis Maize Rice
α
γ
β
Pine
?
B
4 Kb
no apical meristem(NAM) family protein
PtVIN3
Multicopper oxidaseTrehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase
no apical meristem (NAM) family protein
AtvacINV1
disease resistance protein(CC-NBS-LRR class)
3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] synthase III
flavin-containingmonooxygenasefamily protein
flavin-containingmonooxygenasefamily protein
disease resistance protein(CC-NBS-LRR class)
no apical meristem (NAM) family protein
AtvacINV2
Thylakoidlumenal protein-related
no apical meristem (NAM) family protein
flavin-containingmonooxygenasefamily protein
PtVIN2
Multicopper oxidase
Trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase45 Kb45 Kb
3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] synthase III 32 Kb Thylakoid
lumenal protein-related
Figure 3-2. A) Phylogenetic representation of relevant plant species. Stars represent large scale
duplication events as proposed by Blanc and Wolfe (2004), Van de Peer (2004), and Sterck et al. (2005). Greek letters denote duplication events as described by Bowers et al. (2003). There is some uncertainty as to the location of the γ event relative to the divergence of the gymnosperms and angiosperms, this is denoted by “?”. B) Microcolinearity between poplar and Arabidopsis VINs. Boxes depict genes. Poplar VINs are checkered, and Arabidopsis VINs are solid, all other members of a particular gene family are depicted with matching patterns. Labels appear over the first appearance of a certain gene family member. Panel B adapted from Bocock et al. (2007).
74
A
PtVIN2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Mannitol Glucose
% m
RN
A
Actin
0%
OsVIN1
3%
SucRice embryos
AtvacIVR2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Mannitol Glucose
% m
RN
A
Figure 3-3. Conservation of specific VIN isoform transcript repression under sugar treatments
across taxa. A) PtVIN2, AtvacIVR2 and OsVIN1 transcripts are repressed by sugar. Bars represent the mean level of transcript; error bars denote SEM; n=4 and n=3 for PtVIN2 and AtvacIVR2, respectively. Rice panel contributed by L-F Huang. Suc, sucrose.
75
A PtVIN3
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Dark Light
% m
RN
A
PtVIN2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Dark Light
% m
RN
A
B
AtvacIVR2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Dark Light
% m
RN
A
AtvacIVR1
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Dark Light
% m
RN
A
Figure 3-4. Conservation of reciprocal regulation of VIN transcript under dark and light
treatments across taxa. A) Poplar’s PtVIN2 is repressed by light while PtVIN3 is induced by light. Bars represent the mean level of transcript; error bars denote standard error (SEM); n=3. B) Arabidopsis’ AtvacIVR2 is repressed by light while AtvacIVR1 is induced by light. Bars represent the mean level of transcript; error bars denote SEM; n=3. Panel B contributed by L-F Huang (2006).
76
CHAPTER 4 OVEREXPRESSION OF YEAST INVERTASE IN POPLAR
Introduction
Plants fix carbon and obtain energy through photosynthesis whereby sunlight is harnessed
and used to reduce and fix carbon obtained from CO2. As photosynthesis does not occur in all
plant cells, carbohydrates synthesized in the photosynthesizing “source” cells must be
transported to the non-photosynthesizing “sink” cells. The primary products of photosynthesis
are starch and sucrose. While starch serves primarily as a means of storage, sucrose plays a
central role in the transport of photoassimilates throughout the plant.
Sucrose, as the primary form of sugar transport in most plants, acts as a major player in
plant growth and development. Sucrose is a non-reducing disaccharide made of a molecule of
glucose covalently bonded to a molecule of fructose, and is found in multiple compartments
within the cell. In source cells, sucrose is synthesized in the cytosol, can be stored in the vacuole
for later use, can travel to neighboring cells through plasmodesmata, and eventually enters the
phloem via plasmodesmata or from the surrounding apoplast depending on whether the plant is a
symplastic or apoplastic loader of phloem (Turgeon, 1989; Grusak et al., 1996).
The composition of sucrose from two hexoses means sucrose plays roles not only as a
transport molecule, but also in osmotic maintenance and sugar signaling. The cleavage of a
single sucrose molecule in solution results in two molecules of hexoses thereby doubling the
osmotic potential of the solution. By cleaving sucrose and compartmentalizing the resulting
hexoses in various cellular compartments, osmotic gradients are created providing the basis not
only for short-distance transport from cell to cell, but also for long-distance transport from organ
to organ via the phloem as first proposed by Münch (1930). Sucrose and its component hexoses
77
provide sugar signals triggering numerous biological pathways playing roles in cell division,
expansion, differentiation and maturation (Koch, 2004).
The enzymes that cleave sucrose are influential players of plant metabolism and
development. Invertase (EC 3.2.1.26) is one of only two enzymes able to cleave sucrose.
Invertase, also known as β-fructofuranosidase, hydrolyzes sucrose into two hexoses, glucose and
fructose, in an irreversible reaction. Invertase is found in multiple cellular compartments and can
be divided into three sub-families base on cellular localization. Invertases localized to the
vacuole and apoplast are also known as acid invertases based upon their pH optimum for activity
(Haouazine-Takvorian et al., 1997; Sherson et al., 2003). The third sub-family of invertase is
localized to the cytosol and are also known as neutral/alkaline invertases due to their pH
optimum (Chen and Black, 1992; Van den Ende and Van Laere, 1995).
Several groups in the past have utilized transgenic forms of plants to study the role of
invertase in sucrose translocation. Invertase derived from yeast has been overexpressed in the
apoplast in Arabidopsis (Von Schaewen et al., 1990), potato (Heineke et al., 1992), tobacco
(Sonnewald et al., 1991) and tomato (Dickinson et al., 1991). Overexpression in this
compartment resulted in numerous growth defects summarized by stunted growth, inhibition of
photosynthesis, accumulation of leaf starch, and necrotic lesions on leaves followed by overall
yellowing of the leaf (Von Schaewen et al., 1990; Dickinson et al., 1991; Sonnewald et al.,
1991; Heineke et al., 1992). Sonnewald et al. (1991) also overexpressed yeast derived invertase
in the vacuolar and cytosolic compartments of tobacco resulting in similar phenotypes to the
apoplastic overexpressing tobacco plants.
Here I describe the overexpression of yeast invertase in Populus, a deciduous, perennial
tree species. While the previously mentioned work has done much to establish the role of
78
invertase in carbon allocation and partitioning, it is still unknown what roles invertase may play
in a deciduous, perennial plant. The deciduous, perennial nature of poplar requires numerous
cycles of sugar movement and carbon sequestration in storage organs such as the root and stem
in the winter, followed by remobilization of these stored carbon compounds the following spring.
It is also thought that poplar may employ a unique mode of sucrose movement into the phloem
of source leaves analogous to that of poplar’s closely related cousin, willow (both members of
Salicaceae) (Turgeon and Medville, 1998). A reverse genetic approach was utilized here to
directly manipulate invertase levels in three subcellular compartments, so that the effects of
ectopic invertase expression could be assessed in poplar.
Materials and Methods
Plant Material, Transgenesis, and Growth Conditions
Hybrid poplar clone, INRA 717-1-B4 (P. tremula x P. alba) was placed into sterile culture
prior to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (Leple et al., 1992). Individual clones from
independent lines were clonally propagated as softwood cuttings under mist, transferred to 8 L
pots and grown to a height of 60-100 cm prior to experimentation in a fan- and pad-cooled
greenhouse with natural light augmented with full spectrum fluorescent lighting during the
winter to give a day length of 15 h (Lawrence et al., 1997). Greenhouse temperatures ranged
from 20-35 °C. At noon, the light intensity in the greenhouse averaged 500-700 µE/m2/min PAR,
which is one-half the light intensity outside the greenhouse. Plants were grown on an ebb-and-
flow flood bench system with a daily supply of Peters Professional® 20-10-20 water-soluble
fertilizer diluted to a final concentration of 4 mM nitrogen.
Vector Construction
The cell wall targeted SUC2 construct (CwSUC2) was obtained by a generous donation
from Uwe Sonnewald (Institut für Biologie der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
79
Germany). The cytosolic targeted SUC2 construct (CytSUC2) was PCR amplified without the N-
terminal signal peptide from the CwSUC2 construct using the primer sequences: CytSUC2
forward, 5’-CACCATGACAAACGAAACTAGCGATAG-3’; CytSUC2 reverse, 5’-
CAGGTAACTGGGGTCGGGAGAA-3’. The vacuolar targeted SUC2 construct (VacSUC2) was
designed by adding a vacuolar targeting domain from tobacco chitinase to the 3’ end of the
CwSUC2 construct in two PCR steps. The first step used the primer sequences: CwSUC2
forward, 5’-CACCATGGATGTTCACAAGGAAGTTA-3’; VacSUC2 reverse_step_1, 5’-
GTCCAACAAACCATTACCTTTTACTTCCCTTACTTGGAACTTGTCAAT-3’. The second
step used the CwSUC2 forward primer again, and the primer VacSUC2 reverse_step_2, 5’-
TCACATCGTATCTACCAAGTCCAACAAACCATTACCTTTTACTTCC-3’. Cycling
parameters for all PCR reactions were 95 °C for 5 min to activate DNA polymerase, then 35
cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 2 min, followed by a final step of 72 °C for
5 min. The above PCR amplicons were cloned into the pENTR/D-TOPO vector (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA) and then sub-cloned into Gateway destination vectors by LR recombination
reaction for expression in E. coli and Agrobacterium. The Gateway destination vectors were
kindly donated by G. Tuskan (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN).
Construction of Similarity Trees
Amino acid sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW (http://clustalw.genome.jp) to
construct similarity trees using the TREEVIEW program (Page, 1996). The PAUP (Swofford,
1993) program was used for bootstrap analysis with 1,000 iterations.
Isolation of RNA, Generation of cDNA and Real-Time PCR Assay
Total RNA was extracted using standard methods (Chang, 1993), DNase-treated and
purified in RNAeasy QIAGEN columns (Valencia, CA). Purified RNA (5 μg) was used to
80
synthesize cDNA using a mixture of 500 ng oligo-dT, 100 ng random hexamer primers, and M-
MLV-RT as per manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen), with the exception that the DTT was
excluded.
Gene expression was analyzed using the SYBR Green kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and
Mx3000P thermo-cycler (Stratagene) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, each reaction
was run in triplicate and contained 1 μl of synthesized cDNA along with 0.15 μl of each 0.25 μM
primer in a final reaction volume of 50 μl. Primers were designed using NetPrimer (Premier
Biosoft International) software and synthesized by Invitrogen. Primer sequences were as follows:
SUC2 forward, 5’-TTTGAGTTGGTTTACGCTG-3’; SUC2 reverse, 5’-
TATTTTACTTCCCTTACTTGG-3’ (428 bp product). Cycling parameters were 95 °C for 10
min to activate DNA polymerase, then 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 46 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1
min. Melting curves were generated to check the specificity of the amplified fragments. Changes
(n-fold) in gene expression relative to the geometric mean (Vandesompele et al., 2002) of three
control genes encoding actin, ubiquitin and ubiquitin_L (Brunner et al., 2004) were determined
using the program DART-PCRv1.0 (Peirson et al., 2003).
Genomic DNA Isolation and PCR Amplification
To confirm transgene presence, genomic DNA was isolated from poplar leaves using the
Plant DNAeasy Kit (Qiagen) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Approximately 25 ng of DNA
was used as template for PCR. Transgene presence was confirmed by PCR using nptII-specific
primers with the following sequences: forward, 5’-ATCCATCATGGCTGATGCAATGCG-3’;
reverse, 5’-CCATGATATTCGGCAAGCAGGCAT-3’ (253 bp of T-DNA insertion). Cycling
parameters were 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 58 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min. Amplicons
were then separated on 1 % (w/v) agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide.
81
Metabolic Profiling: Extraction, Separation and Identification
For metabolic profiling by GC-MS, three biological replicates for each of the selected
transgenic lines (CwSUC2-2, -14, CytSUC2-18, -50 and VacSUC2-20, -30) and a non-transgenic
(NT) control line were randomized in the greenhouse and grown to a final height of 1 m prior to
the harvesting and pooling of LPI 10-12 leaf tissues. Metabolites were analyzed in pooled leaf
tissues using GC-MS where chromatogram peaks were evaluated via their retention times and
mass spectra as described in Morse et al. (2007).
Construction and Experimental Design of Grafts
Plants were grown under normal conditions until approximately 1 m in height and were
then used as the source for rootstock and scion buds. A bud from scion material was attached to
the rootstock with Parafilm approximately 5 cm above the soil surface. The lateral shoots that
emerged from the rootstock after grafting were removed to facilitate growth of the scion. After
the grafts took (approximately 2 weeks), Parafilm was removed as well as all plant material
above the graft and leaves below the graft inducing the scion bud to break. The scion was
maintained as the only growing stem on the plant and measurements were taken regularly during
growth. Grafting combinations were conducted such that each combination had three replicates
(in some cases, one replicate was lost; these are noted). Grafting combinations are as follows
(scion/rootstock): CwSUC2-2/NT (n=2), CwSUC2-2/CwSUC2-2 (n=2), CwSUC2-14/NT,
CwSUC2-14/CwSUC2-14 (n=2), VacSUC2-20/NT, VacSUC2-20/VacSUC2-20 (n=2), VacSUC2-
30/NT (n=2), VacSUC2-30/VacSUC2-30, NT/CwSUC2-2, NT/CwSUC2-14, NT/VacSUC2-20,
NT/VacSUC2-30, NT/NT. Plants were randomized in the greenhouse and grown to a final height
of approximately 1 m.
82
Measurement of Photosynthesis and Respiration
Photosynthesis parameters were measured on a mature leaf (LPI 12) from each plant of the
grafted plants described previously. Light saturated net photosynthesis was measured with a
portable photosynthesis system (Li-6400, Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE) equipped with a red/blue LED
light source under the following chamber conditions: chamber [CO2] 380 μmol mol-1,
photosynthetic photon flux density 2000 μmol m-2 s-1, leaf temperature 18 to 22 °C, vapor
pressure deficit < 1.5 kPa, air flow rate 500 μmol s-1. Measurements were recorded when the sum
of the coefficients of variation for [CO2], [H2O], and flow rate for a 30 s running period dropped
below 0.3 %. Immediately following the light-saturated net photosynthesis measurement, a net
photosynthesis versus leaf internal CO2 concentration (A-Ci) curve was generated by taking
measurements at nine additional levels of reference [CO2] ranging from 50 μmol mol-1 to 1800
μmol mol-1, with all other chamber conditions remaining constant. The parameters for maximum
rate of carboxylation of Rubisco (Vcmax) and maximum rate of electron transport (Jmax) were
derived from the A-Ci curves with a program (Photosyn Assistant, Dundee Scientific, Dundee,
UK) that fits a model proposed by Farquhar et al. (1980) and modified by von Caemmerer and
Farquhar (1981), Sharkey (1985), Harley and Sharkey (1991) and Harley et al. (1992).
Parameters were adjusted to a standard temperature of 20°C using the methods described in
Walcroft et al. (1997). Statistical differences were assessed by ANOVA using the GLM
procedure of the SAS Version 8.0 statistical software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
To measure foliage respiration, four biological replicates for each of the transgenic lines
CytSUC2-18 and -50 and a NT control line were randomized in the greenhouse and grown to a
final height of approximately 1 m on an ebb-and-flow flood bench system with a daily supply of
Peters Professional® 20-10-20 water soluble fertilizer diluted to a final concentration of 10 mM
83
nitrogen. At noon, plants were moved to a dark growth chamber maintained at 35 °C while
respiration measurements were conducted. Measurements were recorded on both a sink (LPI 5)
and source leaf (LPI 12) from each plant. Respiration was measured with the same
photosynthesis system used for photosynthesis measurements. The photosynthesis leaf chamber
conditions were as follows: chamber [CO2] 380 μmol mol-1, leaf temperature 34 to 36 °C, air
flow rate 200 μmol s-1. Measurements were recorded when the sum of the coefficients of
variation for [CO2], [H2O], and flow rate for a 30 s running period dropped below 0.3 %.
Statistical differences were subjected to ANOVA using the Mixed procedure of the SAS Version
8.0 statistical software package (SAS Institute).
Protein Extraction
Poplar leaves were frozen and ground in liquid nitrogen. Total protein was extracted by
sonicating 300 mg ground tissue for 30 s in 1 ml of cold extraction buffer containing 50 mM
Hepes-KOH, pH 7.4, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 5 mM DTT, 100 µM PMSF and 0.3 %
DIECA. Supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 3,220 g for 20 min at 4 °C and is
referred to as the soluble fraction. The pellet was then washed four times with 5 ml extraction
buffer and resuspended in 2.5 ml extraction buffer containing 1 M NaCl and incubated overnight
at 4 °C. Supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 3,220 g for 20 min at 4 °C and is
referred to as the insoluble fraction. Soluble and insoluble fractions were desalted with extraction
buffer using a 30 kD cutoff Centricon (Millipore, Billerica, MA) in order to concentrate protein,
remove the NaCl from the insoluble fraction and remove the invertase inhibitor from both
fractions. Proteins were quantified using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce, Bonn, Germany) as
per manufacturer’s instructions for the microplate procedure.
84
Total Invertase Activity Assay
Total protein extracts were assayed for total invertase activity using a modification of the
method of Arnold (1965). Briefly, protein extracts (25 µl of soluble or insoluble fractions) were
added to 155 µl of 60 mM phosphate-citrate buffer, pH 4.5. Assays were brought up to 30 °C and
at time zero, 20 µl of 1 M sucrose was added. Reactions were stopped at 30 min by adding 600
µl of a modified Sumner’s reagent containing 1 % (w/v) 3,5 dinitrosalicylic acid, 0.05 % (w/v)
Na2SO3, 1 % (w/v) NaOH and 0.2 % (v/v) phenol. Samples were then incubated at 95 °C for 10
min and absorbance read at 540 nm.
Detection of Invertase Activity in Native Polyacrylamide Gels
SUC2 activity was detected using a native invertase activity gel assay (Gabriel and Wang,
1969). Briefly, protein extracts in 100 mM Tris-phosphate, pH 6.7, 0.1 % (w/v) bromophenol
blue, 10 % (v/v) glycerol, and 0.1 % (v/v) Triton X-100 were loaded on a 10 % (w/v)
polyacrylamide gel. The gel and running buffers were 100 mM Tris-phosphate, pH 6.7. After
running overnight at 40 V and 4 °C, gels were incubated in a 100 mM sucrose, 100 mM NaOAc,
pH 5.0 solution for 30 min at 30 °C. After a quick rinse in distilled water, gels were developed
by incubating in a 95 °C solution of 500 mM NaOH containing 0.1 % (w/v) 2,3,5-
triphenyltetrazolium chloride, giving rise to red bands at positions of invertase activity.
Sugar and Starch Determination
For soluble sugar (glucose, fructose and sucrose) determinations, ground, frozen tissue
samples were extracted using double distilled water and clarified via the Carrez method to
remove proteins. Glucose, fructose and sucrose were calculated from the spectrophotometric
measurement of NADPH production using a D-glucose/D-fructose sugar assay kit as per
manufacturer’s instructions (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany). Starch was solubilized from
85
ground, frozen samples using dimethylsulfoxide and hydrochloric acid and assayed using a
Boehringer Mannheim starch assay kit as per manufacturer’s instructions.
Results and Discussion
Construction of Overexpressing Yeast Invertase Vectors
To further define the role of invertase in the different cellular compartments (apoplast,
cytosol and vacuole) in poplar, I created three constructs designed to target and express the yeast
invertase gene, SUC2, in those compartments via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation
(Figure 4-1). A plasmid containing a cell wall targeted SUC2 was received through a generous
donation from Uwe Sonnewald (Institut für Biologie der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg,
Erlangen, Germany). This construct contains a fusion of SUC2 (nucleotides 64-1765) (Taussig
and Carlson, 1983) with the signal peptide of potato proteinase inhibitor II (nucleotides 1-230)
(Keil et al., 1986). The gene fusion was PCR amplified and recombined into an overexpression
vector using the Gateway (Invitrogen) cloning system and is hereafter referred to as CwSUC2. In
order to create a vacuolar targeted SUC2 gene fusion, the vacuolar targeting domain from
tobacco chitinase (Neuhaus et al., 1991) was fused to the C-terminal end of the CwSUC2
construct and is hereafter referred to as VacSUC2. To direct accumulation of SUC2 in the
cytosol, the coding region of SUC2 was PCR amplified without any signal peptide from the
original CwSUC2 construct and subsequently recombined into the overexpression vector and is
hereafter referred to as CytSUC2. All constructs were driven by two, identical constitutive
CaMV 35S promoters linked in tandem and terminated with the OCS terminator (Figure 4-1).
Yeast invertase was used in these constructs for three reasons: first, SUC2 is known to be
active over a broad pH range (Goldstein and Lampen, 1975), which is important considering the
pH differences between the acidic vacuole and apoplast as compared to the more neutral cytosol.
Secondly, this invertase is not inhibited by the endogenous invertase inhibitors present in plants
86
(Greiner et al., 1998; Greiner et al., 1999; Link et al., 2004; Huang et al., 2007). Lastly, SUC2
has been expressed in a variety of plants to date including Arabidopsis (Von Schaewen et al.,
1990), potato (Heineke et al., 1992), tobacco (Von Schaewen et al., 1990; Sonnewald et al.,
1991; Ding et al., 1993; Sonnewald et al., 1993; Tomlinson et al., 2004) and tomato (Dickinson
et al., 1991), with significant results.
The two major sub-families of plant invertases are the acid and neutral/alkaline invertases.
The acid invertases are thought to have evolved from respiratory eukaryotes and aerobic bacteria
(Sturm and Chrispeels, 1990a) while the neutral/alkaline invertases are thought to have
originated from cyanobacteria (Vargas et al., 2003). SUC2, coming from yeast, a eukaryote,
indicates that SUC2 is more closely related to the plant acid invertase sub-family than the
neutral/alkaline sub-family. The acidic pH optimum for activity of SUC2 also supports this
conclusion. To further address this, amino acid alignments of SUC2 with endogenous poplar
invertases were examined (Figure 4-2A). Additionally, a protein similarity tree was constructed
using full length sequences of invertases included from Arabidopsis, carrot, corn, poplar, potato,
tomato, various micro-organisms, as well as levanase and inulinase (related enzymes provided as
outliers) (Figure 4-2B). These data indicate that although SUC2 may be evolutionarily more
closely related to the acid invertases than the neutral/alkaline invertases, amino acid sequences
have diverged such that SUC2 sequence is as different from the acid invertases as it is from the
neutral/alkaline invertases (Figure 2B). This lack of sequence similarity from the plant invertases
is likely the reason behind the lack of SUC2 inhibition from the endogenous plant invertase
inhibitors.
Expression of SUC2 in Poplar
In order to verify the constitutive nature of the double 35S (2x35S) promoter in poplar, I
analyzed expression of the 2x35S::SUC2 construct in three different organs with RT-qPCR.
87
Plants representing three separate transgenic events were tested in order to average out any line
specific effects. I found that the transgene driven under the double 35S promoter is expressed at
highest levels in leaf (Figure 4-3). Expression levels of the transgene in root and stem are
approximately 50 % of the level of expression of that in leaf (Figure 4-3). RNA from leaf
material was extracted and transgene expression levels analyzed in order to identify the highest
expressing lines of each cellular compartment directed construct (Figure 4-4). The two highest
expressing lines from each compartment were then selected for further experimental analysis.
Yeast Invertase Active in Cytosol
To test that the accumulation of SUC2 transcripts translate to increases in invertase
activity, total protein was extracted and fractionated according to solubility from leaf. The
insoluble fraction yielded no detectable increase in total invertase activity in any of the
transgenic lines examined (data not shown). In the soluble fraction, as much as two fold
increases of total invertase activity were detected in the CytSUC2-18 line (Figure 4-5A), but,
unexpectedly, not in any of the VacSUC2 or CwSUC2 constructs (data not shown). This indicates
that the SUC2 transcript accumulation seen in the cell wall and vacuolar targeted constructs
either did not translate into increased activity or that the increase occurred in the wrong cellular
compartment.
One explanation for the lack of total invertase activity increases in the CwSUC2 and
VacSUC2 transgenic lines could be that the endogenous plant invertases were down-regulated in
order to compensate for the exogenous increases in invertase activity. To address this, an
invertase assay was employed that does not detect plant invertase activity, but can detect SUC2
activity (Sonnewald et al., 1991). Total protein extracts from the insoluble and soluble fractions
were separated by electrophoresis on a non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel and then assayed for
activity (see Materials and Methods). Activity was detected only in the soluble fraction of lines
88
CytSUC2-18 and -50 (Figure 4-5B). This indicates that the total soluble invertase activity
increases seen in Figure 4-5A are a result of the expression of ectopic SUC2. This also indicates
that the lack of activity seen in the cell wall and vacuolar constructs is due to the lack of an
active form of SUC2 in the targeted compartment and not necessarily due to down-regulation of
plant invertase activity.
Metabolic Profiling Reveals Alterations in CwSUC2 and VacSUC2 Transgenic Lines
To determine whether SUC2 expression altered endogenous levels of sugars and any of the
metabolic pathways they feed, leaf tissue from three biological replicates from each of the
selected transgenic lines and NT controls were subjected to metabolite analysis using gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) with electron impact ionization. As was expected
due to lack of detectable invertase activity alterations, the CwSUC2 and VacSUC2 transgenic
lines showed no significant changes in the levels of sucrose, glucose or fructose. Surprisingly, 12
metabolites were found to be significantly altered in at least one of those transgenic lines (Table
4-1). For three of those metabolites, the exact structures could not be determined and are referred
to by their retention index followed by their key mass/charge (m/z) ratios. Many of the other nine
metabolites can be found in, or are associated with, both the glyoxylate and TCA cycles. This
would indicate that even though I could not detect an increase in invertase activity, metabolic
shifts were still occurring in these transgenic poplars. If the glyoxylate cycle is indeed stimulated
in the CwSUC2 and VacSUC2 transgenic lines, this could account for my inability to detect shifts
in glucose and fructose as one end product of the glyoxylate cycle is glucose. As the glyoxylate
cycle occurs in specialized peroxisomes called glyoxysomes, it is possible that the metabolic
consequences of SUC2 expression are restricted to cellular compartments that represent a small
proportion of the total metabolite pool measured in these studies. One possible way to test this
89
hypothesis would be to isolate peroxisomes and evaluate metabolic shifts in these specific
compartments.
Metabolic Profiling Reveals Alterations in Sugar Accumulation in CytSUC2 Transgenic Lines
As would be expected from the increased invertase activity that accumulated in the
CytSUC2 transgenic lines (Figure 4-5), metabolite analysis revealed alterations in the levels of
sucrose as well as its hydrolysis products: glucose and fructose (Table 4-2). The transgenic line
containing the greatest increases of invertase activity (CytSUC2-18) also expressed the greatest
reduction in sucrose levels by nearly 30 %. CytSUC2-50 also revealed reduced levels of sucrose
(20 % reduction), however this was not found to be a statistically significant shift and could be
explained by the lower levels of invertase activity evident in line -50 compared to line -18
(Figure 4-5).
One would expect that increases in invertase activity would result not only in lower levels
of sucrose, but also in increased levels of glucose and fructose since these compounds would be
produced by sucrose hydrolysis. Surprisingly, this was not the case for the CytSUC2 lines where
analyses of both -18 and -50 revealed reductions in glucose and fructose levels (Table 4-2).
Interestingly, the greatest decreases in hexose abundance occurred in line -50, which had the
lowest invertase activity of the two lines. This may indicate that sucrose levels are directly
related to alterations in invertase activity, whereas observed hexose reductions are indirectly
linked to invertase activity. Also of note are the 50 % reductions in malic and glyceric acid levels
in the two CytSUC2 lines (Table 4-2).
One possible explanation for the reductions in hexoses as well as glyceric and malic acids
may lie in increased respiration rates. To test this hypothesis, CytSUC2-18 and -50 plants were
propagated and grown along with NT control plants with a high nutrient fertilizer in a
90
greenhouse. Plants were then moved to a warm (35 °C) growth chamber and kept in the dark
while leaf respiration rates were measured using a portable photosynthesis system from both
source (LPI 12) and sink (LPI 5) leaves. Respiration rates remained unchanged between the
CytSUC2 lines and the NT control plants (data not shown).
Whole-Plant Phenotypes Are Not Apparent
Phenotypes of clonally propagated SUC2 and NT plants were compared at whole-plant, -
organ and molecular-levels (Table 4-3). I detected no differences in propagation efficiency,
growth rate, plant architecture or plant size when grown under controlled greenhouse conditions
(data not shown). One strategy to increase whole-plant differences was to graft transgenic
material onto non-transgenic. This allows me to specifically target SUC2 expression to the root
and/or crown of the tree thereby increasing the sink of the roots while not affecting the ability of
the source organs from photosynthesizing and exporting sucrose. CwSUC2 and VacSUC2 lines
(scion) were grafted onto NT rootstock as well as NT plants (scion) onto CwSUC2 and VacSUC2
rootstock. Control grafts were also performed for all lines (transgenic onto itself, and NT onto
itself) and whole plant phenotypes including growth rates, plant architecture and plant size were
measured as well as photosynthetic rates. In all cases, the transgene was found to have no
detectable effect relative to the NT control (data not shown). Unfortunately the CytSUC2 plants
were excluded from this experiment due to problems in propagation that were unrelated to the
transgenic construct per se.
Concluding Remarks
My results indicate that it was possible to successfully transform poplar with the yeast
invertase gene, SUC2. In contrast to the many other plant species transformed with this gene (see
Introduction) I saw no whole-plant altering phenotypes. This is likely due to the relatively low
level of induction as compared to what was seen in other plant species. In the transformant
91
containing the highest SUC2 activity (CytSUC2-18), I saw approximately a two-fold induction in
total activity (Figure 4-5A). In contrast, tobacco and potato transgenics expressing the same
SUC2 gene saw as much as 50- and 100-fold increases in activity, respectively (Sonnewald et al.,
1991; Heineke et al., 1992). Even with the modest increases in invertase activity seen in poplar, a
subtle metabolic phenotype could be detected in transgenic lines CytSUC2-18 and -50. While the
reduction in sucrose is to be expected, the reduction in glucose and fructose is counter-intuitive.
Increased respiration could be one explanation of the decrease in hexoses I observed. This
hypothesis would also be supported by the more dramatic reductions observed in malic acid.
Respiration was measured, but no significant changes were detected. This may simply be
because respiration was not altered significantly enough to be measurable. Alternatively,
respiration may not have been altered at all, in which case the metabolic shifts observed may
have resulted from some other metabolic pathway.
The SUC2 constructs targeted to the cell wall and vacuole pose a conundrum. While
transcripts were detected for the CwSUC2 and VacSUC2 transgenes, invertase activity was not
detected either in the total activity assay or in the native gel assay. This would seemingly
indicate that the transcript simply did not result in detectable levels of mature, active protein.
However, a metabolic phenotype was evident in these transgenics. Since no increase in total
activity was found, one potential explanation for this metabolic phenotype may reside in altered
workloads of endogenous invertase to exogenous yeast invertase. The increase in activity
resulting from the transgene may have led to a compensatory down-regulation of the plants’
endogenous invertase activity. Minimal changes to sugar levels would thus have been likely. The
lack of detectable activity in the native gel makes this a tenuous hypothesis, however. This
hypothesis could only be correct if the yeast invertase underwent some sort of post-translational
92
modification in the cell’s secretory system rendering the yeast invertase inactive in the native gel
assay, much like the undetectable plant invertases. If this were true, the in vivo increases in
activity must be quite small. Collectively, my data indicate that the transgenic poplar lines did
give rise to metabolic phenotypes, but that these were not straightforward to interpret. Also,
these transgenics did not show detectable whole-plant phenotypes potentially due to the
relatively subtle increases of SUC2 dependent invertase activity.
93
SP SUC2
Vacuolar targeted invertase
ChitinaseVTD
35S35S
ATGTAGSP SUC2
Vacuolar targeted invertase
ChitinaseVTD
35S35S
ATGTAG
SP SUC2
Cell wall targeted invertase
35S35S
ATG
TAGSP SUC2
Cell wall targeted invertase
35S35S
ATG
TAG
SUC2
Cytosolic targeted invertase
35S35S
ATGTAGSUC2
Cytosolic targeted invertase
35S35S
ATGTAG
Figure 4-1. Schematic representation of yeast invertase overexpressing constructs
targeted to the cytosol, cell wall and vacuole. Block arrows represent 35S promoter, solid black box represents SUC2 coding region, brick filled box represents the signal peptide (SP) taken from potato proteinase inhibitor II, cross-hatched box represents the vacuolar targeting domain (VTD) taken from tobacco chitinase.
94
A PtVIN2 1 WQRTAFHFQPEENWMNDPNGPLYYKG--WYHFFYQYNPHAAVW-GDIVWGHAVSKDLIHW PtCIN1 1 VHRTGYHFQPPRHWINDPNAPMYYKG--LYHLFYQYNPKGAVW-GNIVWAHSVSKDLINW PtNIN2 1 -------------AANDPGDKMPLNY--DQVFVRDFVPS-----ALAFLLRG--EGEIVK PtNIN10 1 -------------AAMDTSADALNY---NQVFVRDFVPT-----GLACLMKEPPEPEIVR S_cerSUC2 1 ---------PNKGWMNDPNGLWYDEKDAKWHLYFQYNPNDTVWGTPLFWGHATSDDLTNW PtVIN2 58 LHLPLAMVADKWYDKNGVWTGSATILPDGKIVMLYTGSTN-ESVQVQNLAYPADHDDPLL PtCIN1 58 ESLEPAIYPSKWFDNYGCWSGSATVLPNGEPVIFYTGIVDKNNSQIQNYAVPANLSDPYL PtNIN2 39 NFLLHALQLQSWEKTVDCYSPGQGLMP--------------ASFKVRTVPLDDNNLEEVL PtNIN10 40 NFLLKTLHLQGLEKRVDNFTLGEGVLP--------------ASFKV---LYDSDLEKETL S_cerSUC2 52 EDQPIAIAPK--RNDSGAFSGSMVVDYN-------------NTSGFFNDTIDPRQRCVAI PtVIN2 117 LKWVKYSGNPVLVPPPGIGAKDFRDPTTAWKTSEGKWRIIIGSKINKTGIALVYDTEDFI PtCIN1 118 REWVKPDDNPIVNPDANVNGSAFRDPTTAWWADG-HWRILIGSRRKHRGVAYLYRSKDFK PtNIN2 85 DPDFGESAIGRVAP-----------------VDSGLWWIILLRAYGKLTGDYALQER--- PtNIN10 83 LVDFGASAIGRVAP-----------------VDSGFWWIILLRSYIKRTRDYALLDR--- S_cerSUC2 97 WTYNTPESEEQYIS---------------YSLDGGYTFTEYQKNPVLAANSTQFRDPKVF PtVIN2 177 NYELLSGILHGVPKTGMWECVDFYPVSKTGQNGLDTSVNGPQVKHVIKTS-LDDDRHDYY PtCIN1 177 KWVKAKHPLHSVQGTGMWECPDFYPVSLSGENGLDPSVMGQNVKHVLKVS-LDMTRYEYY PtNIN2 125 ------VDVQTGIKLILNLCLADGFDMFPSLLVTDGSCMIDRRMGIHGHP-LEIQALFYS PtNIN10 123 ------PEVQNGMKLILKLCLSDGFDTFPTLLCADGCSMIDRRMGIYGYP-IEIQALFYF S_cerSUC2 142 WYEPSQKWIMTAAKSQDYKIEIYSSDDLKSWKLESAFANEGFLGYQYECPGLIEVPTEQD PtVIN2 236 ALGTYADKVGKWYPDNPEIDVGIGIRYDYGIFYASKTFYDQSKGRRVLWGWIGESDSEVA PtCIN1 236 TMGTYDKKKDKYFPDEGLVDGWAGLRLDYGNFYASKTFFDPSTNRRILWGWANESDDPQK PtNIN2 178 ALRSSREMLVVNDGSKNLVRAINNRLSALSFHIREYYWVDMRKINEIYRYKTEEYSTEAT PtNIN10 176 ALRCAKQMLKPELDGKEFIERIEKRITALSYHIQTYYWLDFTQLNNIYRYKTEEYSHTAV S_cerSUC2 202 PSKSYWVMFISINPGAPAGGSFNQYFVGSFNGTHFEAFDNQSRVVDFGKDYYALQTFFNT PtVIN2 296 DVKKGWASLQGIPRTVVLDTKTGSNLLQWPVEEVESLRLKSKNFNNIEVKAGSAVPLELD PtCIN1 296 DKDKGWAGIQLIPRKVWLD-PSGKQLLQWPVAELEKLRGHNVQLSNQMLDQGNHVEVKVI PtNIN2 238 NKFN--IYPEQIPSWLMDWIPEEGGYLIGNLQPAHMDFRFFTLGNLWSVVSSLGTPKQNE PtNIN10 236 NKFN--VIPESIPDWVFDFMPLRGGYLIGNVSPARMDFRWFLVGNCVAILSSLVTPAQAT S_cerSUC2 262 DPTYGSALGIAWASNWEYSAFVPTNPWRSSMSLVRKFSLNTEYQANPETELINLKAEPIL PtVIN2 356 GATQLDIVAEFELD----RKAIERTAESNVEFSCSTNGGASHRGALGPFGLLVLADDDLT PtCIN1 355 TAAQADVDVTFSFSSLDKAEPFDPKWAKLDALDVCAQKGSKDPGGLGPFGLLTLASENLE PtNIN2 296 AVLNLIESKWDDLVG-----------NMPLKICYPALESEDWRIITGSDPKNTPWSYHNG PtNIN10 294 AIMDLVEERWEDLIG-----------EMPLKITYPALEGHEWRLVTGFDPKNTRWSYHNG S_cerSUC2 322 NISNAGPWSRFATNT-------TLTKANSYNVDLSNSTGTLEFELVYAVNTTQTISKSVF PtVIN2 412 EYTPVYFFVAKGNNGSLKTFFCTDQSRSSVANDVRKEIYGSYVPVLEGEKLS----VRIL PtCIN1 415 EFTPVFFRVFKAADKHKVLLCSDARSSSLGKELYKPSFAGFVDVDLTDKKLS----LRSL PtNIN2 345 GSWPTLLWQFTLACMKMDRMELAQKAIALAEKRLQVDHWPEYYDTRSGKFIG----KQSR PtNIN10 343 GSWPMLLWLLSAACIKVGRPQIAKRAIELAEQRLSKDGWPEYYDGKTGRYVG----KQAR S_cerSUC2 375 ADLSLWFKGLEDPEEYLRMGFEVSASSFFLDRGNSKVKFVKENPYFTNRMSVNNQPFKSE
95
PtVIN2 468 VDHSIIESFAQGGRTCITSRVYPTRAIYGSARLFLFNNAT-EAGVTSSLKIWNMNSAFIR PtCIN1 471 IDHSVVESFGAGGRIAISSRVYPTIAVFEKAHLYVFNNGS-ETITVKNLNAWSMNTPVMN PtNIN2 401 LYQTWTVAGFLTSKVLLENPEKASLLFWDEDYDLLEFCVC-GLNTSGRKRCSRVAARSQI PtNIN10 399 KYQTWSIAGYLVAKMMVENPSNLLMISLEEDKKSARSRLT-RSNSTSF------------ S_cerSUC2 435 NDLSYYKVYGLLDQNILELYFNDGDVVSTNTYFMTTGNALGSVNMTTGVDNLFYIDKFQV PtVIN2 527 PYSNEQQ PtCIN1 530 VPVKS-- PtNIN2 460 LV----- PtNIN10 ------- S_cerSUC2 495 REVK--- B
tomatoTIV1tomatoTIV1
AT4G09510AT4G09510AT1G35580AT1G35580
PtNIN12PtNIN12PtNIN8PtNIN8
AT1G22650AT1G22650
AtcwINV1AtcwINV1
AT3G06500AT3G06500
InulinaseInulinase
carrotInvcarrotInv Dc4Dc4PtVIN3PtVIN3
AT1G72000AT1G72000
AtcwINV6AtcwINV6maizecwIVR4maizecwIVR4
AT4G34860AT4G34860PtNIN9PtNIN9
PtNIN11PtNIN11
maizecwIVR2maizecwIVR2maizecwIVR3maizecwIVR3
PtCIN5PtCIN5
PtCIN4PtCIN4
PtCIN2PtCIN2PtCIN1PtCIN1
PtCIN3PtCIN3
maizecwIVR1maizecwIVR1
tomatoLin8tomatoLin8tomatoLin7tomatoLin7
carrotInvcarrotInv Dc3Dc3carrotInvcarrotInv Dc2Dc2
carrotInvcarrotInv Dc1Dc1
AtcwINV3AtcwINV3AtcwINV5AtcwINV5
tomatoLin5tomatoLin5potatoIVRGEpotatoIVRGEtomatoLin6tomatoLin6
S cerevisiaeSUC2S cerevisiaeSUC2
100100
100100
100100
9393
100100
100100II
IIIIII
IIII
IVIV
Figure 4-2. S. cerevisiae SUC2 in relationship to other plant invertases. A) Amino acid
alignment of SUC2 and select poplar invertases. Black shading corresponds to identical residues, grey shading corresponds to similar residues. Alignment produced with CLUSTALW and figure produced with BOXSHADE. B) Amino acid similarity tree using full length sequences. Depicts phylogenetic relationship of S. cerevisiae SUC2 (in bold) with selected invertases from Arabidopsis, carrot, corn, poplar, potato and tomato. Invertases from various micro-organisms are also included along with the closely related enzymes, levanase and inulinase, provided as outliers. Clades I-IV represent vacuolar, cell wall, α-neutral/alkaline and β-neutral/alkaline invertases, respectively. α- and β- designations of the neutral/alkaline invertases represent two distinct clades as described by Bocock et al. (2007). Bootstrap values of the major clades are depicted and reported as a percentage of 1,000 repetitions. Branch lengths denote protein similarity.
96
Double 35S driven SUC2 expression
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
root stem leaf
Organ
Rel
ativ
e tra
nscr
ipt (
%)
Figure 4-3. Relative expression of double 35S driven SUC2 in root, stem and leaf. Bars represent the mean level of SUC2 transcript across three separate transgenic events; error bars denote standard error, n=3.
97
A Relative expression of CytSUC2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
18 50 16 2 21 25 17 28 31 12 6 9 36 NT 19
Transgenic line
Rel
ativ
e tra
nscr
ipt (
%)
B
Relative expression of CwSUC2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2 14 25 26 28 11 3 10 NT
Transgenic line
Rela
tive
tran
scri
pt (%
)
C Relative expression of VacSUC2
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
30 20 29 15 21 38 27 36 24 25 34 NT 7
Transgenic line
Rela
tive
trans
crip
t (%
)
Figure 4-4. Relative expression of SUC2 transcript in overexpressing transgenic events in leaf. A) Cytosolic targeted construct. B) Cell wall targeted construct. C) Vacuolar targeted construct. In all panels, bars represent mean level of SUC2 transcript; error bars denote standard error when available, n=3.
98
A Total invertase activity (soluble
fraction)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
NT Cyt-18 Cyt50
Transgenic line
Act
ivity
(µm
ol s
uc
hydr
olyz
ed *
min
-1 *
mg
prot
ein
-1)
B
Cyt
18-1
Cyt
18-2
Cyt
50-1
Cyt
50-2
NT
NT
Cyt
18-1
Cyt
18-2
Cyt
50-1
Cyt
50-2
NT
NT
IS S
Cyt
18-1
Cyt
18-2
Cyt
50-1
Cyt
50-2
NT
NT
Cyt
18-1
Cyt
18-2
Cyt
50-1
Cyt
50-2
NT
NT
IS S
Figure 4-5. CytSUC2 transgenic plants display increased invertase activity due to presence of transgene. A) Soluble proteins were extracted from a source leaf (LPI 12) and assayed for invertase activity. Bars represent mean invertase activity, error bars denote standard error, n=2. B) Protein extracts (20 µg total protein each lane) were separated using non-denaturing gel electrophoretic conditions and assayed for activity.Top panel: No invertase activity is detected in NT plants or in the insoluble fraction (IS). Activity can be seen (red bands) in the soluble fraction (S) of CytSUC2 lines -18 and -50 in both biological reps. Bottom panel: Coomassie stain of gel to show loading.
99
Table 4-1. Metabolites altered in CwSUC2 and VacSUC2 overexpressing plants expressed as a ratio of μg/g FW (glucose equivalents) of transgenic/NT controls.
VacSUC2-20/NT VacSUC2-30/NT CwSUC2-2/NT CwSUC2-14/NT5 Carbon-sugar alcohol 1.08 1.18* 1.17* 1.18†
Iditol 1.11 1.29* 1.21* 1.16Glucoside (m/z 434) 1.08 1.55† 1.21 1.3716.25-273 (Unknown compound) 0.74 0.56 0.52† 0.45†
alpha-keto-Glutaric acid 1.11 1.27 1.63* 2.43*Maleic acid 1.13 1.25 1.42* 1.33Citric acid 1.21 1.25 1.39* 0.7910.79-184 (Unknown compound) 1.08 0.58* 0.35* 0.28*Fumaric acid 1.43 2.48 1.58* 1.32Serine 0.88 0.87 0.89 0.69*Carbamoyl-phosphate 0.97 0.62† 0.35* 0.35*15.7-221 327 (Unknown compound) 0.5* 0.62* 0.51* 0.42**=significant at 0.05†=significant at 0.10
100
Table 4-2. Metabolites altered in CytSUC2 overexpressing plants expressed as a ratio of μg/g FW (sorbitol equivalents) of transgenic/NT controls.
CytSUC2-18/NT CytSUC2-50/NTFructose 0.83* 0.80*Sucrose 0.71* 0.82Myoinositol 0.68* 0.96Glucose 0.75 0.70†
Galactose 0.65† 0.61†
Glyceric acid 0.52† 0.57†
Malic acid 0.52† 0.52†
*=significant at 0.05†=significant at 0.10
101
Table 4-3. Summary of phenotypic experiments performed. Trait Tested Plants Tested Significant Changes Found
PCR verification of transgene Cyt, Cw, Vac Cyt, Cw, VacTranscriptional changes Cyt, Cw, Vac Cyt, Cw, VacInvertase activity Cyt, Cw, Vac CytSugars (fructose, glucose, sucrose) (root, stem, leaf) Cyt, Cw, Vac Cyt (leaf)Metabolites Cyt, Cw, Vac Cyt, Cw, VacRootability Cyt, Cw, Vac noGrowth rates Cyt, Cw, Vac noStarch (leaf, root and stem) Cyt, Cw, Vac noRespiration Cyt noGrowth rates after grafting Cw, Vac noPhotosynthetic rates after grafting Cw, Vac no
102
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS
As a first step in examining the role invertase plays in carbon allocation and partitioning,
the invertase family was identified in Populus trichocarpa, a woody, perennial tree species
whose genome was recently sequenced (Tuskan et al., 2006) (Chapter 2). The identification of
eight acid invertase genes; three of which belong to the vacuolar targeted group (PtVIN1-3), and
five of which belong to the cell wall targeted group (PtCIN1-5) is described. Similarly, I report
the identification of 16 neutral/alkaline invertase genes (PtNIN1-16). Expression analyses using
whole genome microarrays and RT-PCR revealed evidence for expression of all invertase family
members. Evidence is also reported for expression of a novel intronless vacuolar invertase
(PtVIN1), which apparently arose from a processed PtVIN2 transcript that re-inserted into the
genome. An examination of the microsyntenic regions surrounding the poplar invertase genes
revealed extensive colinearity with Arabidopsis invertases, indicating strong evolutionary
conservation in the development of the invertase family between the two species. To further
determine if the evolutionary conservation of the invertase family, demonstrated by conserved
colinearity, extended to the functional level, vacuolar invertases were selected as a case study
(Chapter 3). Vacuolar invertases have a well documented reciprocal response to sugar treatment
in which one invertase is up-regulated while the other is down-regulated after sugar treatment in
maize (Xu et al., 1996). The conserved, colinear structure of the chromosomal regions
containing these vacuolar invertase genes in Arabidopsis and poplar did not extend to maize and
rice. However, the reciprocal response was found to occur in all four plant species. One
explanation for this is that the function of these genes has been conserved throughout evolution.
An alternative hypothesis is that this reciprocal response is an example of parallel evolution that
arose independently in the different plant lineages. Finally, invertase activity in poplar was
103
manipulated with transgenesis by ectopically expressing yeast invertase in three cellular
compartments (apoplast, cytosol and vacuole) (Chapter 4). This doubled invertase activity in the
cytosol, but did not alter invertase activity in other cellular compartments. Subtle shifts in carbon
partitioning within the cell were observed, but no detectable alterations in carbon allocation
between tissues. Specific invertase genes identified in Chapter 2 were also targeted for repression
via RNAi (Appendix A).
The overall objective of determining contributions by invertase to carbon allocation and
partitioning in a woody perennial was met in the following ways:
• Poplar contains three vacuolar invertases, one of which is a novel, intronless gene found only in poplar.
• Poplar contains five cell wall invertases. • Poplar contains 16 neutral/alkaline invertases that clearly divide into two, structurally
distinct groups and represents a significant expansion in gene number over that of Arabidopsis and rice.
• Poplar and Arabidopsis acid invertases share substantial similarities in their chromosomal
arrangement indicating that chromosomal duplication can explain much of the development of the invertase family.
• Poplar and Arabidopsis vacuolar orthologs identified through shared colinearity both retain
a conserved, reciprocal response to exogenous sugar treatment that is also found in the monocots, maize and rice.
• Invertase activity in poplar can be increased through the introduction of exogenous yeast
invertase. • An increase in invertase activity shifts carbon partitioning within the cell.
This research has opened up several new questions that would be valuable to be addressed
in future research. The first question is to address how invertase fits into the hypothesized lack of
active phloem loading model proposed by Turgeon and Medville (1998) for poplar and similar
species. One possibility could be that the expansion of the neutral/alkaline invertase sub-family
104
in poplar may contribute to the movement of photoassimilates through the mesophyll cells and
into the phloem.
A second question that arises from this research deals with the significance and
development of the intronless PtVIN1. It is unknown when in poplar’s evolutionary history
PtVIN1 arose. When this question is addressed, it may also help us to understand the function of
this intronless gene.
The third question deals with the activity of the cell wall invertase sub-family members. It
has recently been reported that two of the six cell wall invertases in Arabidopsis may not be
invertases, but rather fructan exohydrolases (FEHs) (De Coninck et al., 2005). FEH protein
sequences are nearly identical to those of demonstrated acid invertase proteins, but FEH does not
use sucrose as a substrate (De Coninck et al., 2005). It is likely that at least one poplar cell wall
invertase is in fact an FEH, but analysis of recombinant cell wall invertase activity was outside
the scope of research presented here.
The fourth question is why the poplars ectopically expressing yeast invertase lack whole-
plant phenotypes. Several groups overexpressed yeast derived invertase in the apoplast of
Arabidopsis (Von Schaewen et al., 1990), potato (Heineke et al., 1992), tobacco (Sonnewald et
al., 1991) and tomato (Dickinson et al., 1991). Sonnewald et al. (1991) also overexpressed yeast-
derived invertase in the vacuolar and cytosolic compartments of tobacco. In all cases,
overexpression resulted in numerous growth defects that included stunted growth, inhibition of
photosynthesis, accumulation of leaf starch and formation of necrotic lesions on leaves followed
by overall yellowing of the leaf (Von Schaewen et al., 1990; Dickinson et al., 1991; Sonnewald
et al., 1991; Heineke et al., 1992). The lack of phenotypes might be due to the relatively modest
induction of activity (two-fold) as compared to these other plants. This may have resulted from
105
inadvertent selection and propagation of the most vigorous transgenic plants, and hence those
least markedly altered.
Fifth, and finally, valuable work could be performed on poplar plants with a reduction in
invertase activity. As described in Appendix A, transgenic poplars were produced encoding
constructs designed to repress specific endogenous invertase genes through the use of RNAi.
These plants have been confirmed to express the transgene, however they have not been screened
for reduced expression of the targeted invertase gene or even a reduction in overall invertase
activity. The phenotype of these lines is normal and thus the cost of intensive phenotypic
screening must be weighed against the likely benefit of the approach.
The purpose of this research was to investigate invertase contributions to carbon allocation
and partitioning in a woody perennial. To achieve this goal, the invertase family was identified
and annotated using the sequenced genome of Populus trichocarpa. Several novel features were
identified in the poplar invertase family. These include a three-member vacuolar invertase sub-
family, an expressed, intronless vacuolar invertase as well as an expansion of the neutral/alkaline
invertase family relative to that of Arabidopsis and rice. The response of two poplar vacuolar
invertases (PtVIN2 and -3) to exogenous sugar treatments was examined. A reciprocal regulation
of transcript first documented in maize was also found to occur, similar to that of Arabidopsis
and rice. A reverse genetic approach was also employed by ectopic expression of yeast invertase
in transgenic poplar resulting in a subtle shift in carbon partitioning as shown by metabolic
analyses. In conjunction, RNAi was used to target endogenous poplar invertases for down-
regulation.
106
APPENDIX A REPRESSION OF INVERTASE IN POPULUS
Introduction
The cell wall and vacuolar invertases have been repressed in several plant species,
including tomato (Ohyama et al., 1995), potato (Zrenner et al., 1996), and carrot (Tang et al.,
1999). The results from these experiments were more varied than those of the invertase
overexpressors, although the theme of increased sucrose content accompanied by a decrease in
hexoses pervaded. In tomato these alterations in sugar accumulations appeared in both the fruit
and leaves. In addition to altered sugar levels, the fruit also had elevated rates of ethylene
evolution. In carrot, growth was shown to be altered at very early stages of development. The
transgenic, cotyledon-stage embryos were still masses of cells while the control plants had
already developed two to three leaves and one primary root. However, when these plantlets were
grown on media supplemented with hexoses, their growth returned to normal. After maturation
and transfer to soil, the plants expressing the cell wall anti-sense cDNA had a significantly
increased shoot to root ratio and accumulated more sucrose and starch than the controls. The
vacuolar anti-sense plants had increased numbers of leaves, while tap root size was slightly
decreased.
Here I describe the design of vectors aimed at endogenous invertase repression via RNAi
in Populus, a deciduous, perennial tree species. While the previously mentioned work has done
much to establish the role of invertase in carbon allocation and partitioning, it is still unknown
what roles invertase may play in a deciduous, perennial plant system. The deciduous, perennial
nature of poplar requires numerous cycles of sugar movement and carbon sequestration in
storage organs such as the root and stem in the winter, followed by remobilization of these stored
carbon compounds the following spring. It is also thought that poplar may employ a unique
107
mode of sucrose movement into the phloem of source leaves analogous to that of poplar’s
closely related cousin, willow (both members of Salicaceae) (Turgeon and Medville, 1998).
These added levels of complexity that can be seen by utilizing the model tree, poplar, may offer
us new insights into the function of invertase.
Materials and Methods
Plant Material, Transgenesis and Growth Conditions
Hybrid poplar clone, INRA 717-1-B4 (P. tremula x P. alba) was placed into sterile culture
prior to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (Leple et al., 1992) on media supplemented
with glucose and fructose. Individual clones from independent lines were clonally propagated as
softwood cuttings under mist, transferred to 8 L pots and grown to a height of 60-100 cm prior to
experimentation in a fan- and pad-cooled greenhouse with natural light augmented with full
spectrum fluorescent lighting during the winter to give a day length of 15 h (Lawrence et al.,
1997). Greenhouse temperatures ranged from 20-35 °C. At noon, the light intensity in the
greenhouse averaged 500-700 µE/m2/min PAR, which is one-half the light intensity outside the
greenhouse. Plants were grown on an ebb-and-flow flood bench system with a daily supply of
Peters Professional® 20-10-20 water-soluble fertilizer diluted to a final concentration of 4 mM
nitrogen.
Vector Construction
The pCAPT binary vectors for RNAi was constructed as described by Filichkin et al.
(2007). Briefly, the vector was constructed using the pART27 backbone (Gleave, 1992). The
GATEWAY Conversion System (Invitrogen) was used to incorporate the proper recombination
sites and genes for positive and negative selection. This consists of an attR recombination site
flanking a ccdB gene and a chloramphenicol resistance gene. The vector contains spectinomycin
and kanamycin (NPTII) resistance genes for selection in bacteria and plants, respectively.
108
Approximately 200 bp target fragments of acid invertase genes from poplar (primer sequences
listed in Table A-1) were PCR amplified using primers with tails encoding attB recombination
sites. GATEWAY entry clones were created using BP Clonase (Invitrogen) mediated
recombination. The entry clones were finally cloned into the pCAPT binary vector using LR
Clonase (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. All constructs were sequenced.
Genomic DNA Isolation and PCR Amplification
To clone target gene sequences and transgene presence, genomic DNA was isolated from
poplar shoot tip tissue. Approximately 250 mg of tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen and added
to a buffer containing 0.3 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.9), 1 mM EDTA, and 4 mg/mL
diethyldithiocarbamic acid. Samples were spun (20,800 rcf) and pellets resuspended in a buffer
containing 100 mM Tris (pH 7.9), 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 1 % SDS, 0.1 % 2-
mercaptoethanol, and 100 μg/ml proteinase K. Samples were incubated at 65 ˚C for 1 h, spun
(20,800 rcf) and supernatant extracted with chloroform. Isopropanol was used to precipitate the
DNA at room temperature, spun (20,800 rcf), and resuspended in Tris-EDTA buffer. One μl
RNase A was added to DNA sample and incubated at 37 ˚C for 30 min. The chloroform
extraction was repeated, followed by ethanol precipitation in presence of sodium acetate at -80
°C for 1 h. Samples were spun for 10 min (20,800 rcf), air dried and resuspended in Tris-EDTA
buffer. Approximately 25 ng of genomic DNA was used as template for PCR. Cycling
parameters were 95 °C for 5 min to activate DNA polymerase, then 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s,
annealing temperature for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min followed by a final step at 72 °C for 5 min.
The annealing temperature was set to five degrees below the melting temperature for the primer
pair (Tm listed in Table A-1). Amplicons were then separated on 1 % (w/v) agarose gels and
stained with ethidium bromide. Transgene presence was confirmed by PCR using nptII-specific
109
primers with the following sequences: forward, 5’-ATCCATCATGGCTGATGCAATGCG-3’;
reverse, 5’-CCATGATATTCGGCAAGCAGGCAT-3’ (253 bp of T-DNA insertion). Cycling
parameters were 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 58 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min. Amplicons
were then separated on 1 % (w/v) agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide.
Results
Construction of RNAi Vector
To repress endogenous poplar acid invertase genes, I used a binary vector, pCAPT,
graciously donated by Stephen DiFazio (West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV) (Figure
A-1). The pCAPT vector is designed for the cloning and insertion of a target sequence. A single
GATEWAY cassette (Invitrogen) is located upstream of an inverted repeat of the octapine
synthase (OCS) terminator. Transcription is controlled by two CaMV 35S promoters linked in
tandem. This transcript results in a hairpin formed by the inverted repeat of the OCS terminator.
Transitive silencing of the inserted target gene fragment then occurs via RNAi (Filichkin et al.,
2007).
Insertion of Target Gene Sequence
The acid invertase gene family was selected to be used for RNAi directed gene silencing.
Using annotated sequences described in Chapter 2, nucleotide alignments were constructed using
the eight acid invertases in poplar. Two gene specific primer pairs per gene were designed such
that a ~200 bp fragment from both the N-terminal and C-terminal ends of the gene could be PCR
amplified from genomicDNA (Figure A-2; Table A-1). These fragments were then cloned into
the pCAPT binary vector which was then sequenced to verify insertion in the proper orientation.
The pCAPT binary containing the target gene insert was then grown in Agrobactierium and used
to transform poplar trees as outlined in the Materials and Methods. Shoot tips from regenerated
transgenic poplars were used as a source of genomic DNA to screen for the presence of the
110
transgene using primers directed against the NPTII reporter gene as outlined in the Materials and
Methods. Table A-2 contains a complete list of all pCAPT vectors and regenerated transgenic
poplars that were successfully made.
Further Work
The next step in this project is to screen the approximately 30 separate transgenic events
per construct in order to verify the effectiveness of the RNAi vector and rank the transgenic
plants according to target gene transcript levels. Transcripts from the other acid invertase family
members then need to be quantified to check for the specificity of the RNAi mediated gene
silencing as well as to screen for compensatory increases in related gene transcripts in case of
functional redundancy. Total invertase activity should then be assayed to verify that a
successfully silenced invertase gene results in decreased invertase activity. Phenotyping could
then be done where one would expect increases in available sucrose, decreases in available
hexoses, as well as whole-plant phenotypes such as alterations in growth rates.
111
RB 35S gfp R1 R2 OCS-R PIV2 OCS-F nos5’ NPTII nos3’ LB
Gene Fragment
Figure A-1. Schematic representation of pCAPT vector (16041 bp) used for RNAi silencing. R1
and R2, attR recombination sites flanking a ccdB gene and a chloramphenicol resistance gene from the GATEWAY vector conversion cassette (Invitrogen). RB and LB, right and left T-DNA borders, respectively; 35S, double CaMV 35S promoter linked in tandem; gfp, fragment of GFP coding sequence; PIV2, potato intron; OCS-R and OCS-F, octopine synthase terminator fragments in reverse (R) and forward (F) orientations, respectively; NPTII, neomycin phosphotransferase II; gene fragment, location of targeted invertase sequences. Diagram not to scale, adapted from (Filichkin et al., 2007).
112
Spacer
~200 base pair oligo OCS OCS
PtCIN2 ~3.6kb
5’ construct
3’ construct
35S35S
Spacer
~200 base pair oligo OCS OCS
35S35S
Figure A-2. Schematic representation of RNAi directed constructs. Endogenous PtCIN2 demonstrates strategy of RNAi construct design. PtCIN2 exons are represented by black boxes and introns by black lines. The 5’ and 3’ ~200 bp-oligos to be targeted by RNAi constructs are marked by black lines below their respective locations. The RNAi constructs containing the ~200 bp-oligos are depicted below the PtCIN2 schematic. Grey block arrows represent 35S promoter, solid black box represents endogenous ~200bp-oligo to be targeted by RNAi machinery, dotted block arrows represent OCS terminator oriented in opposing directions and separated by a short potato intron (grey box) in order to form hairpin in vivo. Figure not drawn to scale.
113
Table A-1. Primer sequences used for ~200 bp target sequence cloning. Primer Name Primer Sequence Tm (°C)PtCIN1 NT forward CACCATGGGCTATGCCACACAC 61PtCIN1 NT reverse CGTTGATCCAGTGCCTTGGAGG 66PtCIN1 CT forward CACCGAGAGTTTTGGAGC 53PtCIN1 CT reverse AACATTCATGACAGGCGT 51PtCIN2 NT forward CACCATGGCTATATGCCAAACAC 61PtCIN2 NT reverse GTTGATCCAGTTCCTAGGAGGCT 61PtCIN2 CT forward CACCGAGAGTTTTGGAGC 53PtCIN2 CT reverse TTCATTGCGTGGATTCTCTC 56PtCIN3 NT forward CACCATGGCTTTGTTAAAGTTTCTC 62PtCIN3 NT reverse GTTGATCCAGTTCTTAGGAGGCTG 61PtCIN3 CT forward CACCGAAAGTTTTGGAG 48PtCIN3 CT reverse GACATTCATCACAGGCAC 48PtCIN4 NT forward CACCTTCTTGGTTGGTTTATGC 59PtCIN4 NT reverse GGTTCTATATGACTGCTTTTCTTGC 59PtCIN4 CT forward CACCGAGAGTTTTGGTGGG 58PtCIN4 CT reverse TTGATTTGGGCTTTGTTCATG 59PtCIN5 NT forward CACCGGAGATATCTGTTATTTGG 58PtCIN5 NT reverse ATTCATCCAGTTTTTAGGAGGTTG 59PtCIN5 CT forward CACCTAGTTGAGAGTTTTGGTGGT 60PtCIN5 CT reverse CTAAAGGTGTGGCTTCCTTCG 59PtVIN2 NT forward CACCCTTCCAGTTTCCAATTCCTTA 65PtVIN2 NT reverse AACAAAGTCTCGGGTTTCGC 61PtVIN2 CT forward CACCCGTTGCTGAGTTTGAGTTA 62PtVIN2 CT reverse TGAGGCTGCCATTATTTCCTTTG 63PtVIN3 NT forward CACCCCCACCATACACTCCCTTG 67PtVIN3 NT reverse TGGTGATACCCCTTGAGCCACTCC 68PtVIN3 CT forward CACCAGTTTTGCTCAAGGAG 56PtVIN3 CT reverse TTGGTCAAATAGGAAAGGATGG 59
114
Table A-2. Summary of RNAi constructs made. NT and CT, N-terminal and C-terminal constructs, respectively; X denotes possession of the RNAi construct (pCAPT) and transgenic plant expressing the construct.
Gene pCAPT Transgenic PlantPtCIN1 , NT X X
CT XPtCIN2 , NT X
CT X XPtCIN3 , NT X
CT X XPtCIN4 , NT X
CT XPtCIN5 , NT X X
CT X XPtVIN2 , NT XPtVIN3 , NT X X
CT X X
115
APPENDIX B REGULATION OF INVERTASE: A “SUITE” OF TRANSCRIPTIONAL AND POST-
TRANSCRIPTIONAL MECHANISMS
This appendix contains a review that resulted from a collaboration between Dr. Li-Fen
Huang, Dr. Karen Koch and myself. It was published in Functional Plant Biology. While I took
part in the construction and editing of the entire manuscript, some parts I did not write. I did not
write the PPV compartmentalization, differential sugar regulation, or RNA turnover sections. I
also originate the idea for the first figure. All other parts are my original work.
Abstract
Recent evidence indicates that several mechanisms can alter invertase activity and, thus,
affect sucrose metabolism and resource allocation in plants. One of these mechanisms is the
compartmentalization of at least some vacuolar invertases in precursor protease vesicles (PPV),
where their retention could control timing of delivery to vacuoles and hence activity. PPV are
small, ER-derived bodies that sequester a subset of vacuolar-bound proteins (such as invertases
and protease precursors) releasing them to acid vacuoles in response to developmental or
environmental signals. Another newly-identified effector of invertases is wall-associated kinase
2 (WAK2), which can regulate a specific vacuolar invertase in Arabidopsis (AtvacINV1) and
alter root growth when osmolyte supplies are limiting. WAKs are ideally positioned to sense
changes in the interface between the cell wall and plasma membrane (such as turgor), because
the N-terminus of each WAK extends into the cell wall matrix (where a pectin association is
hypothesised) and the C-terminus has a cytoplasmic serine/threonine kinase domain (signaling).
Still other avenues of invertase control are provided by a diverse group of kinases and
phosphatases, consistent with input from multiple sensing systems for sugars, pathogens, ABA
and other hormones. Mechanisms of regulation may also vary for the contrasting sugar responses
of different acid invertase transcripts. Some degree of hexokinase involvement and distinctive
116
kinetics have been observed for the sugar-repressed invertases, but not for the more common,
sugar-induced forms examined thus far. An additional means of regulation for invertase gene
expression lies in the multiple DST (Down STream) elements of the 3’- untranslated region for
the most rapidly repressed invertases. Similar sequences were initially identified in small auxin-
up RNAs (SAUR) where they mediate rapid mRNA turnover. Finally, the invertase inhibitors,
cell wall- and vacuolar inhibitors of fructosidase (CIF and VIF, respectively) are
indistinguishable by sequence alone from pectin methylesterase inhibitors (PMEI); however,
recent evidence suggests binding specificity may be determined by flexibility of a short, N-
terminal region. These recently characterized processes increase the suite of regulatory
mechanisms by which invertase – and, thus, sucrose metabolism and resource partitioning – can
be altered in plants.
Introduction
The capacity to use sucrose is essential to most plant cells, because this sugar is typically
the long-distance transport form for carbohydrates. Invertase (EC 3.2.1.26) irreversibly
hydrolyses sucrose into glucose and fructose, and is thus positioned to play a central role in both
carbon metabolism and sugar signaling. Glucose and fructose are hexoses that serve as an energy
source for respiration, provide metabolites for synthetic processes, generate osmotic pressure in
growing tissues and function as metabolic signals affecting the expression of many downstream
genes (Koch, 2004). Given the importance of sucrose cleavage and the diverse roles for products
of invertase activity, it is not surprising that multiple avenues have developed for the regulation
of the invertases.
Several invertase isozymes have been identified from plant species as either soluble
(readily extractable from cytosol or vacuole), or insoluble (bound to cell wall components).
Vacuolar and cell wall invertases show optimal activity at an acidic pH and thus are also called
117
acid invertases. The mature acid invertases are glycosylated and located in the cellular
compartment their name implies (e.g. cell wall or vacuolar).
Invertase is regulated at transcriptional and post-translational levels by many different
factors including hormones, sugars, pathogens, oxygen availability and proteinaceous inhibitors
(Zeng et al., 1999; Long et al., 2002; Link et al., 2004; Trouverie et al., 2004; Voegele et al.,
2006). However, important new methods of control have also been identified by recent work on
the invertase path of sucrose use. These are reviewed here and include protein trafficking,
signaling cascades, transcript turnover and inhibitor binding.
Compartmentalization of Vacuolar Invertases in Precursor Protease Vesicles (PPV)
A new level of regulation has been revealed for vacuolar invertase activity by recent
evidence for their localization in a class of minute vesicles called precursor protease vesicles
(PPV) (Rojo et al., 2003). These organelles surround the large, central vacuole, as well as the
smaller, protein-storage vacuoles (Chrispeels and Herman, 2000; Hayashi et al., 2001; Rojo et
al., 2003). The PPV are best known for their roles as storage sites for precursor proteases that are
later released into vacuoles, where the low pH activates maturation of the protease precursors
(Chrispeels and Herman, 2000; Hayashi et al., 2001; Schmid et al., 2001). These vesicles are
plant-specific ER bodies, formed from dilated cisternae of the ER and surrounded with
ribosomes (Chrispeels and Herman, 2000; Hayashi et al., 2001). PPVcontain a distinct
population of proteins that include protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), binding protein [(BiP)
HSP-70] (Schmid et al., 2001), PYK10 β-glucosidase (Matsushima et al., 2003) and precursor
proteins for diverse cysteine proteases such as responsive to dehydration-21 (RD21) (Hayashi et
al., 2001), cysteine endopeptidase [CysEP (from castor bean)] (Schmid et al., 2001) and vacuolar
processing enzyme gamma (VPEγ) (Chrispeels and Herman, 2000; Rojo et al., 2003).
118
Presence of vacuolar invertases in PPV is supported by localization of at least one vacuolar
invertase to these compartments in Arabidopsis (Rojo et al., 2003). Collectively, the PPV
contents, including the vacuolar invertase(s), are released into the vacuolar lumen by a fusion of
these organelles with the tonoplast. The process is distinct from the autophagic engulfment of
other vesicles by the vacuole (Chrispeels and Herman, 2000; Hayashi et al., 2001). When the
PPV contents enter acidic vacuoles, the acid invertase moves into a low-pH, high-sucrose
environment optimal for its activity.
Previous evidence indicates that before vacuolar fusion, PPV are not acidic enough to
support appreciable acid invertase activity. A low pH would also activate maturation of the
VPEγ cysteine protease (Hayashi et al., 2001; Schmid et al., 2001) and, thus, rapidly degrade the
invertase. The AtvacINV2 vacuolar invertase is indeed a target of VPEγ after this protease
matures in the acidic central vacuole (Rojo et al., 2003). However, the rate of proteolytic
degradation of invertase by VPEγ is modest in the vacuole and probably a result of dilution in
the larger compartment. It is feasible that co-retention of both the VPEγ protease and vacuolar
invertase in PPV could be a mechanism of retaining their activities in reserve for later purposes.
Once the PPV fuses with the central vacuole, action of the maturing protease on the invertase
would limit the duration of any increases in sucrose-cleaving activity that arose from the release
of PPV contents into the acidic vacuole. Such pulse-type mechanisms of regulation facilitate fine
control, and are evident for some of the sucrose synthases (Hardin et al., 2003), and for
increments of starvation-induced autophagy (Rose et al., 2006).
The impact of vacuolar invertase retention by PPV could vary considerably. The portion of
total invertase in these organelles at any given time could be significant under some
circumstances and limited in others (Rojo et al., 2003). It is also unclear whether all vacuolar
119
invertases follow a PPV path to acid vacuoles and whether this might vary with conditions or
plant development. In Arabidopsis, one or both vacuolar invertases may be involved, because the
proteins are virtually identical (Rojo et al., 2003; Carter et al., 2004). Still another factor is likely
to be the timing and extent of PPV fusions with acid vacuoles. This can occur during senescence
(Schmid et al., 2001; Rojo et al., 2003), salt stress (Hayashi et al., 2001) and possibly during
diverse, pre-senescent phases of development (Rojo et al., 2003). Recent evidence has indicated
PPV may contribute to pathogen responses (Rojo et al., 2004) and aspects of seed development
such as seed coat formation (Nakaune et al., 2005), seed protein properties (Gruis et al., 2004)
and remobilization of seed structures including the megagametophyte (He and Kermode, 2003),
endosperm (Schmid et al., 2001) and nucellar tissue (Greenwood et al., 2005).
Wall-Associated Kinase (WAK)
Recent work has shown that a wall-associated kinase (WAK) can play a role in the
regulation of vacuolar invertase thus establishing a cross-compartmental link between WAK and
vacuolar invertase(s) (Kohorn et al., 2006b).AT-DNA null allele of WAK2 reduced vacuolar
invertase activity in Arabidopsis roots by 62% and decreased levels of a specific vacuolar
invertase transcript (AtvacINV1) by over 50%. The wak2–1 null allele also reduced plant growth
under low nutrient conditions. Unlike effects on vacuolar invertase, the cell wall isoforms were
unaltered by the wak2–1 null allele, indicating either that other WAKs may regulate cell wall
invertases, or that WAK-based signals mediate only vacuolar forms (Kohorn et al., 2006b). This
work further supports the role of vacuolar invertases in resource partitioning as well as turgor
maintenance and cell wall expansion (Koch, 2004).
Wall-associated kinases proteins are hypothesized to serve as sensors of cellular turgor, the
extent of cell wall loosening, and/or the degree of cell expansion (Zhang et al., 2005; Kohorn et
al., 2006b). WAKs are ideally positioned to do so, because they span the plasma membrane
120
(Figure B-1). Each of the five WAK genes encodes a transmembrane protein with an active
cytoplasmic serine/threonine kinase domain on the C-terminus and a distinctive extracellular
domain on the N-terminus. The extracellular domain is similar to the vertebrate epidermal
growth factor-like domain. Evidence indicates this extracellular domain may be bound to pectin
in the cell wall, which would provide a link to the extracellular matrix (He et al., 1999; Wagner
and Kohorn, 2001; Decreux and Messiaen, 2005; Kohorn et al., 2006a). This physical tie
between the extracellular matrix and the cytoplasm could provide an anchor, or reference point
enabling the WAK to play a role in sensing or transmitting information on the status of the cell
wall relative to the plasma membrane. Such information could be invaluable to adjustment of
cell expansion or turgor. Different members of the WAK family are expressed at organ junctions,
in shoot and root apical meristems, in expanding leaves, and in response to environmental stimuli
such as wounding and pathogen attack (Wagner and Kohorn, 2001). Antisense reduction of
WAK1–5 protein levels also established the necessity of these genes for expansion of leaf cells
(cellular division was unaffected) (Lally et al., 2001; Wagner and Kohorn, 2001).
The WAK family appears to be part of a larger, 22-member WAK-like (WAKL) family in
Arabidopsis and is widespread in the plant kingdom (Verica and He, 2002). Protein gel blots
usingWAK1 antibodies indicate related proteins in pea, tobacco and maize (He et al., 1996; Gens
et al., 2000). WAKL expressed sequence tags have also been identified in tomato, soybean and
rice (Verica and He, 2002), but a functional relationship between WAK and WAKL has yet to be
shown.
Other Kinases Affecting Invertases
Invertase can be activated by mycorrhization, pathogen infection and wounding, as well as
various hormones (Sturm and Chrispeels, 1990a; Benhamou et al., 1991; Ehness et al., 1997;
Hall and Williams, 2000; Blee and Anderson, 2002; Pan et al., 2005). Diverse kinases appear to
121
regulate activity of both cell wall and vacuolar invertases in many of these instances (Ehness et
al., 1997; Pan et al., 2005). The serine/threonine kinase inhibitor, staurosporine, prevents the
accumulation of invertase transcripts that typically occurs during defence responses (Ehness et
al., 1997). In contrast, the same inhibitor, and also two other serine/threonine kinase inhibitors
(K252a and H7), increase the extent to which ABA induces both vacuolar and cell wall
invertases (Pan et al., 2005). However, the tyrosine protein kinase inhibitor, quercetin, strongly
suppresses the ABA induction of acid invertases (Pan et al., 2005) indicating that multiple types
of kinases with differing modes of regulation are involved in modulating invertase activity.
Phosphatases have also been implicated in the regulation of invertases (Ehness et al., 1997;
Pan et al., 2005). Pan et al. (2005) demonstrated that expression and activity of both vacuolar
and cell wall invertases increased in response to ABA and acid phosphatase. These data, in
conjunction with the kinase inhibitor data, indicate that reversible protein phosphorylation is
playing some role in the ABA signaling network (Pan et al., 2005). The phosphatase inhibitor,
endothall, also induces cell wall invertase transcripts when added to cell suspensions of
Chenopodium rubrum (Ehness et al., 1997). This work on invertase is consistent with other
ongoing analyses of both ABA and defense-signaling cascades (Roitsch et al., 2003; Roitsch and
Gonzalez, 2004).
Differential Sugar Regulation of Invertases
Despite the widespread use of invertase expression as a sugar response marker in yeast
(Ahuatzi et al., 2004; Kig et al., 2005), the regulation of these genes has been difficult to dissect
in plants. Not only are there many more individual invertase genes (Tymowska-Lalanne and
Kreis, 1998a; Sturm, 1999; Sherson et al., 2003), but they are also differentially regulated (Xu et
al., 1996; Tymowska-Lalanne and Kreis, 1998a; Huang, 2006), and sugar response mechanisms
vary (Roitsch et al., 1995; Xiao et al., 2000; Huang, 2006). All plant species studied to date have
122
two vacuolar invertases (Haouazine-Takvorian et al., 1997), with several cell wall invertases.
Fully-sequenced genomes indicate six putative cell wall invertases in Arabidopsis (Tymowska-
Lalanne and Kreis, 1998a; Sherson et al., 2003) and nine in rice (Ji et al., 2005). Additional
complexity has been introduced by recent evidence that two of the putative cell wall invertase
sequences may encode fructan exohydrolases (a closely-related enzyme) (De Coninck et al.,
2005). Similar invertase family structures are also evident in poplar, maize, potato and tomato
(Fridman and Zamir, 2003; Huang, 2006); P. N. Bocock, unpubl. data).
The majority of these invertases are sugar-induced rather than repressed (Roitsch, 1999;
Roitsch and Ehness, 2000), which is consistent with their roles in carbon use v. carbon
acquisition by plants (Koch, 1996; Rolland et al., 2002; Koch, 2004). Both vacuolar and cell wall
invertases enhance use of carbohydrate resources by cleaving imported sucrose at sites of growth
or storage (Winter and Huber, 2000; Koch, 2004). These invertases can also amplify sugar
signals to other genes that respond to changes in hexose availability (Koch, 2004).
The identities of sugars that induce invertases remain unclear, however. Evidence thus far
indicates limited involvement of the classic hexokinase-mediated sensing system in up-
regulation of invertases by sugars. Neither overexpression of the key hexokinase gene, AtHXK1,
nor its antisense reduction reportedly affects expression of a sugar-induced AtcwINV1 (β-fruct1)
gene for cell wall invertase in Arabidopsis (Xiao et al., 2000). Non-hexokinase mechanisms of
sugar sensing may play more widespread roles in sugar-induced gene expression than previously
recognized (Purcell et al., 1998; Rolland et al., 2002; Sinha et al., 2002; Lalonde et al., 2004;
Halford, 2006). Although signaling systems differ between plants and yeast, the hexokinase-
based sensing in yeast is largely linked to sugar repression rather than induction (Johnston, 1999;
Palomino et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2006), and a balance between the two is hypothesized to
123
mediate responses (Ronen and Botstein, 2006). In plants, mechanisms of sugar sensing have thus
far been studied mainly by following responses of genes down-regulated by glucose (e.g.
photosynthesis, seed germination) (Smeekens, 2000; Rolland et al., 2002; Rolland and Sheen,
2005). Another consideration is that genes known to be sucrose- rather than hexose-responsive
are often expressed in or near the vascular system (Rook et al., 1998), as are many invertases
(Andersen et al., 2002; Wachter et al., 2003).
Some acid invertase genes are sugar-repressed. This is less common, but occurs
consistently in all species examined thus far. The singular repression of one vacuolar invertase
by sugars is conserved across gene families in maize (Xu et al., 1996), tomato (Godt and
Roitsch, 1997b), rice (Huang, 2006) and poplar (P. N. Bocock, unpubl. data). At least some
degree of involvement has been indicated for the hexokinase-mediated sensing system in this
repression. Contributions from this mechanism are supported by data from metabolizeable and
non-metabolizeable glucose analogues tested in Arabidopsis for their capacity to repress the
AtvacINV2 vacuolar invertase (Huang, 2006). Another feature of invertase repression by sugars
is its rapid down-regulation, with responses evident in minutes rather than hours (Huang, 2006).
Still another factor may be the demonstrated compartmentalization of the sugar-repressed
AtvacINV2 invertase protein in the precursor protease vesicles [see section on PPV (Rojo et al.,
2003)], implying a possible relationship between the PPV and the observed sugar responses.
Finally, additional insights into the sugar repression of some invertases may lie in their
respective roles. Demands for osmotic constituents (two hexoses from one sucrose) may well
dominate sucrose partitioning in response to specific developmental and/or stress signals.
Expression of at least one vacuolar invertase under these conditions could be highly
advantageous, and need not be viewed as separate from its role in sucrose import. Sucrose
124
entering cells is often cleaved first in the vacuole, thus giving vacuolar invertase a prominent role
in sucrose partitioning (Koch, 2004). Theoretically, expression of a starvation-tolerant invertase
could confer an import priority for certain cells or tissues under stress, as well as favor
immediate allocation of incoming resources to osmotic constituents. A similar scenario could
hold for key aspects of development that rely heavily on osmotic constituents for cellular
expansion. Data thus far are consistent with contributions by both the sugar-induced and -
repressed vacuolar invertases to import-based osmotic support of expansion sinks. Examples
include root elongation in Arabidopsis (Stessman, 2004; Huang, 2006; Kohorn et al., 2006b;
Sergeeva et al., 2006), petiole growth in sugar beet (Gonzalez et al., 2005), expansion of ovaries
and silks in maize (Andersen et al., 2002), enlargement of Agrobacterium-induced galls
(Wachter et al., 2003) and growth of diverse fruits and vegetables such as tomatoes, carrot roots
and newly-forming potato tubers (Koch and Zeng, 2002).
RNA Turn Over and DST
At least one mechanism of post-transcriptional regulation of invertase is also indicated for
the sugar-repressed vacuolar invertases. In both rice and Arabidopsis, the 3’ untranslated regions
of the sugar-repressed genes OsVIN1 and AtvacINV2 carry apparent downstream (DST) elements
implicated in rapid turnover of plant mRNAs (Huang, 2006). The DST are highly conserved and
can mediate sequence-specific decay of short-lived mRNA in vivo (Newman et al., 1993;
Sullivan and Green, 1996). The DST are especially notable for their role in rapid destabilization
of small auxin-up RNAs (SAUR) (Newman et al., 1993; Gil and Green, 1996; Johnson et al.,
2000; Feldbrugge et al., 2002).
Additional evidence is also consistent with altered mRNA longevity for the sugar-
repressed form of vacuolar invertase. Although glucose rapidly decreases mRNA levels of the
AtvacINV2 vacuolar invertase in vivo (within 30 min), the promoter alone shows a contrasting
125
induction by sugars (Huang, 2006). When transcription is blocked by cordycepin, however, a
glucose-enhanced rate of decay is evident for AtvacINV2 mRNA (Huang, 2006). Glucose-based
destabilization of mRNAs thus seems a likely contributor to the rapid repression observed for the
AtvacINV2 vacuolar invertase (Huang, 2006).
Invertase Inhibitors
Cell wall and vacuolar invertase activity can be regulated by a family of proteinaceous
inhibitors known as cell wall inhibitor of fructosidase (CIF) and vacuolar inhibitor of
fructosidase (VIF), or collectively as C/VIF reviewed by Rausch and Greiner (2004). Although
CIF are cell wall invertase inhibitors, they are broadly active against both cell wall and vacuolar
invertases. In contrast, VIF inhibition is specific to vacuolar invertases. Neither of the inhibitors
affect fungal invertases indicating a minimal role for these interactions in pathogen defense
(Greiner et al., 1998; Greiner et al., 1999; Link et al., 2004). The C/VIF related protein family is
not highly conserved, and in Arabidopsis, sequence identities range from roughly 20 to 40% for
~14 family members (Rausch and Greiner, 2004). The C/VIF related protein family also contains
pectin methylesterase inhibitors (PMEI). PMEI are indistinguishable from the C/VIF by
sequence alone and retain nearly identical structures to the C/VIF (Giovane et al., 2004; Hothorn
et al., 2004a; Hothorn et al., 2004b; Di Matteo et al., 2005).
Important implications arise from the capacity of these related proteinaceous inhibitors to
distinguish between their targets. Arabidopsis has only eight putative acid invertases (six cell
wall and two vacuolar), but more than 60 pectin methylesterase (PME)-related genes based on
sequence similarity (Micheli, 2001; Sherson et al., 2003; Rausch and Greiner, 2004; De Coninck
et al., 2005). X-ray crystollagraphy has revealed that CIF is conformationally stable over a broad
pH and temperature range, however, the invertase/inhibitor complex is only stable at an acidic
pH. This indicates that binding is determined not by conformational changes, but rather by pH-
126
induced changes at the interface of the invertase/inhibitor complex (Hothorn et al., 2004a;
Hothorn and Scheffzek, 2006). In contrast, the highly similar structure of the PMEI was found to
undergo large structural rearrangements (Figure B-2) under these same conditions suggesting
PMEI uses a different mode of binding than does the CIF (Hothorn et al., 2004b). PMEI contains
a flexible α-hairpin that is important both in dimer formation and in binding of PME (Hothorn et
al., 2004b). Chimeral domain swap experiments of the α-hairpin domain between PMEI and CIF
indicate that this domain of PMEI is necessary and sufficient for activity against PME; however,
the corresponding α-hairpin in NtCIF is not sufficient for invertase inhibition (Hothorn et al.,
2004b). The ~28 amino acid residues encoding this α-hairpin may be key in distinguishing these
two classes of inhibitors (Hothorn et al., 2004b).
Analysis of PMEI and CIF crystal structures not only clarifies interactions between these
inhibitors and their targets, but also aids our understanding of how distinct functions can arise for
proteins sharing very similar structures and ancestry. It is worth noting, however, that the
crystallographic analyses were performed on the cell wall invertase inhibitor and thus do not
explain the apparently narrower substrate specificity of the vacuolar invertase inhibitor. These
data indicate that the VIF may use a different mode of action than the CIF. It is also of interest
that two proteins in Arabidopsis previously annotated based on sequence similarity as cell wall
invertases (AtcwINV3&6), may actually be fructan exohydrolases (FEH).FEH protein sequences
are nearly identical to those of demonstrated acid invertase family members, yet the recombinant
enzymes are completely inactive against sucrose (De Coninck et al., 2005). It has yet to be
determined if the C/VIF family can distinguish between the FEH and the known invertase and
PME substrates, and given the level of sequence diversity within the inhibitor family it seems
likely that biochemical and structural analyses will be required to resolve these questions.
127
Summary
Compartmentalization of vacuolar invertase in PPV introduces a new dimension to
regulation of invertases in vivo (Rojo et al., 2003; Koch, 2004). The PPV sequester at least some
of the vacuolar invertase(s) (Rojo et al., 2003) and other proteins (especially protease precursors)
(Chrispeels and Herman, 2000; Hayashi et al., 2001) for later release into acid vacuoles. It is
currently unclear whether these invertases are active inside PPV before vesicle fusion with
acidic, sucrose-containing vacuoles.
Wall-associated kinases can regulate vacuolar invertases (Kohorn et al., 2006b). At least
one of them (WAK2) regulates a specific vacuolar invertase (AtvacINV1) that predominates in
Arabidopsis roots. IfWAK2 is dysfunctional, vacuolar invertase activity drops to less than 50%
in roots, and growth is impaired under low-osmolyte conditions. The WAK kinases are ideally
positioned to serve as status sensors for the interface between the plasma membrane and cell
wall, because each WAK has an N-terminus in the extracellular matrix (possibly associated with
pectin), and a C-terminal serine/threonine kinase domain in the cytoplasm (signaling capacity).
Diverse kinases and phosphatases have been implicated in the regulation of invertases,
which is consistent with the range of signaling networks that affect them. These extend from
sugar and ABA sensing, to interactions with pathogens and symbionts.
Contrasting responses to sugars within the invertase gene family may also be mediated by
different mechanisms. Some degree of hexokinase involvement and distinctive kinetics have
been observed for the sugar-repressed invertases (Huang, 2006), but not for the more common,
sugar-induced forms examined thus far (Xiao et al., 2000).
DST elements implicated in mRNA turnover also lie in the 3’ untranslated region of the
most rapidly repressed invertases. Their sequences resemble those in SAUR where they mediate
mRNA destabilization.
128
The invertase inhibitors, CIF and VIF share high sequence similarity with PMEI, but
evidence from crystal structures and chimeral proteins suggests that binding specificity may be
determined by flexibility of a short, N-terminal region.
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Science Foundation, Metabolic Biochemistry Program, GrantAward
No. MCB-0080282; the Department of Energy,Office of Science, Office of Biological and
Environmental Research, Grant Award No. DE-AC05–00OR22725; and the University of
Florida Experiment Station for funding.
129
Cellwall
Extracellulardomain
Transmembranedomain
Nucleus
PPVs
Plasma membrane
VPEγ
Vacuole
Vacuolar invertase
STK domain
WAK
Cellwall
Extracellulardomain
Transmembranedomain
Nucleus
PPVs
Plasma membrane
VPEγ
Vacuole
Vacuolar invertase
STK domain
WAK
Figure B-1. Recent additions to mechanisms controlling invertases include the wall associated kinases (WAK), precursor protease vessicles (PPV), and vacuolar processing enzymes (VPE). At least one WAK (WAK2) can regulate activity of a specific vacuolar invertase (AtvacINV1) in Arabidopsis. The WAK are ideally positioned to detect alterations in the interface between the cell wall and plasma membrane (e.g. turgor or expansion), because their extracellular terminus resides in the cell wall matrix (possibly anchored in pectin) and their cytoplasmic tail includes a kinase domain. This kinase can apparently trigger cascades regulating transcription of vacuolar invertase and other effectors of its activity. Also, at least some vacuolar invertase(s) reach the vacuole through PPV, where they can be sequestered for extended periods. Timing of activity may be determined by when the enzyme is released to an acidic, sucrose-storing environment. The PPV also releases protease precursors such as the vacuolar processing enzyme [VPEγ (▲)], into the acidic vacuole which then act upon vacuolar invertases (●) to limit the duration of their activity.
130
PMEIOpen conformation
Closed conformation
CIF
XX
PMEIOpen conformation
Closed conformation
CIF
XXXX
Figure B-2. Protein inhibitors of cell wall invertases (CIF, cell wall inhibitor of fructosidase) share strong sequence similarity with inhibitors of pectin methylesterase (PMEI, pectin methylesterase inhibitor), but crystal structures indicate important differences in flexibility. The top panel depicts CIF. The oval denotes an α-hairpin thought responsible for binding specificity of CIF and PMEI. The α-hairpin in CIF is rigid at all pHs and temperatures tested. The bottom panel shows PMEI in three different conformations that demonstrate the flexibility of the PMEI α-hairpin. (Hothorn et al., 2004a; Hothorn et al., 2004b; Hothorn and Scheffzek, 2006). Images were constructed by Protein Explorer (Martz, 2002).
131
LIST OF REFERENCES
Adams KL, Wendel JF (2005) Novel patterns of gene expression in polyploid plants. Trends in Genetics 21: 539-543
Ahuatzi D, Herrero P, de la Cera T, Moreno F (2004) The glucose-regulated nuclear
localization of hexokinase 2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is Mig1-dependent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279: 14440-14446
Alberto F, Bignon C, Sulzenbacher G, Henrissat B, Czjzek M (2004) The three-dimensional
structure of invertase (beta-fructosidase) from Thermotoga maritima reveals a bimodular arrangement and an evolutionary relationship between retaining and inverting glycosidases. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279: 18903-18910
Andersen MN, Asch F, Wu Y, Jensen CR, Naested H, Mogensen VO, Koch KE (2002)
Soluble invertase expression is an early target of drought stress during the critical, abortion-sensitive phase of young ovary development in maize. Plant Physiology 130: 591-604
Ap Rees T (1984) Sucrose metabolism. In DH Lewis, ed, Storage Carbohydrates in Vascular
Plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 53-73 Arai M, Mori H, Imaseki H (1991) Roles of sucrose-metabolizing enzymes in growth of
seedlings: purification of acid invertase from growing hypocotyls of mung bean seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol 32: 1291-1298
Arnold WN (1965) beta-Fructofuranosidase from Grape Berries. Biochim Biophys Acta 110:
134-147 Balakirev ES, Chechetkin VR, Lobzin VV, Ayala FJ (2003) DNA polymorphism in the beta-
Esterase gene cluster of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 164: 533-544 Balibrea ME, Dell'Amico J, Bolarin MC, Perez-Alfocea F (2000) Carbon partitioning and
sucrose metabolism in tomato plants growing under salinity. Physiologia Plantarum 110: 503-511
Balk PA, de Boer AD (1999) Rapid stalk elongation in tulip (Tulipa gesneriana L. cv.
Apeldoorn) and the combined action of cold-induced invertase and the water-channel protein gamma TIP. Planta 209: 346-354
Becker A, Theissen G (2003) The major clades of MADS-box genes and their role in the
development and evolution of flowering plants. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 464-489
Benhamou N, Grenier J, Chrispeels MJ (1991) Accumulation of Beta-Fructosidase in the
Cell-Walls of Tomato Roots Following Infection by a Fungal Wilt Pathogen. Plant Physiology 97: 739-750
132
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the False Discovery Rate - a Practical and
Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Methodological 57: 289-300
Bennetzen JL, Ma J (2003) The genetic colinearity of rice and other cereals on the basis of
genomic sequence analysis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6: 128-133 Bergh MLE, Cepko CL, Wolf D, Robbins PW (1987) Expression of the Saccharomyces-
Cerevisiae Glycoprotein Invertase in Mouse Fibroblasts - Glycosylation, Secretion, and Enzymatic-Activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 84: 3570-3574
Blanc G, Wolfe KH (2004) Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from
age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16: 1667-1678 Blee KA, Anderson AJ (2002) Transcripts for genes encoding soluble acid invertase and
sucrose synthase accumulate in root tip and cortical cells containing mycorrhizal arbuscules. Plant Molecular Biology 50: 197-211
Blobel G (1980) Intracellular protein topogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77: 1496-1500 Bocock PN, Morse AM, Dervinis C, Davis JM (2007) Evolution and Diversity of Invertase
Genes in Poplulus trichocarpa. Planta: in press Bournay AS, Hedley PE, Maddison A, Waugh R, Machray GC (1996) Exon skipping
induced by cold stress in a potato invertase gene transcript. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 2347-2351
Bowers JE, Chapman BA, Rong JK, Paterson AH (2003) Unravelling angiosperm genome
evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature 422: 433-438
Bradshaw HDJ, Ceulemans R, Davis J, Stettler R (2000) Emerging Model Systems in Plant
Biology: Poplar (Populus) as a Model Forest Tree. J Plant Growth Regul 19: 306-313 Bradshaw HDJ, Stettler R (1995) Molecular genetics of growth and development in Populus.
IV. Mapping QTLs with large effects on growth, form, and phenology traits in a forest tree. Genetics 139: 963-973
Brenner ML, Cheikh N (1995) The role of phytohormones in photosynthate partitioning and
seed filling. Kluwer Academic Press, Boston Brunner A, Yakovlev IA, Strauss SH (2004) Validating internal controls for quantitative plant
gene expression studies. BMC Plant Biology 4
133
Burge C, Karlin S (1997) Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. Journal of Molecular Biology 268: 78-94
Carlson M, Botstein D (1982) 2 Differentially Regulated Messenger-Rnas with Different 5'
Ends Encode Secreted and Intracellular Forms of Yeast Invertase. Cell 28: 145-154 Carter C, Pan SQ, Zouhar J, Avila EL, Girke T, Raikhel NV (2004) The Vegetative Vacuole
Proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana Reveals Predicted and Unexpected Proteins. Plant Cell 16: 3285-3303
Chang S, Puryear, J., Cairney (1993) A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from
pine trees. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 11: 113-116 Charlesworth D, Liu FL, Zhang L (1998) The evolution of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene
family by loss of introns in plants of the genus Leavenworthia (Brassicaceae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 552-559
Chen JQ, Black CC (1992) Biochemical and Immunological Properties of Alkaline Invertase
Isolated from Sprouting Soybean Hypocotyls. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 295: 61-69
Chrispeels MJ, Herman EM (2000) Endoplasmic reticulum-derived compartments function in
storage and as mediators of vacuolar remodeling via a new type of organelle, precursor protease vesicles. Plant Physiology 123: 1227-1233
Coulombe-Huntington J, Majewski J (2007) Characterization of intron loss events in
mammals. Genome Research 17: 23-32 De Bodt S, Maere S, Van de Peer Y (2005) Genome duplication and the origin of angiosperms.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20: 591-597 De Coninck B, Le Roy K, Francis I, Clerens S, Vergauwen R, Halliday AM, Smith SM,
Van Laere A, Van den Ende W (2005) Arabidopsis AtcwINV3 and 6 are not invertases but are fructan exohydrolases (FEHs) with different substrate specificities. Plant Cell and Environment 28: 432-443
Decreux A, Messiaen J (2005) Wall-associated kinase WAK1 interacts with cell wall pectins in
a calcium-induced conformation. Plant and Cell Physiology 46: 268-278 Di Matteo A, Giovane A, Raiola A, Camardella L, Bonivento D, De Lorenzo G, Cervone F,
Bellincampi D, Tsernoglou D (2005) Structural basis for the interaction between pectin methylesterase and a specific inhibitor protein. Plant Cell 17: 849-858
Dickinson CD, Altabella T, Chrispeels MJ (1991) Slow-growth phenotype of transgenic
tomato expressing apoplastic invertase. Plant Physiol 95: 420-425
134
Ding B, Haudenshield JS, Willmitzer L, Lucas WJ (1993) Correlation between Arrested Secondary Plasmodesmal Development and Onset of Accelerated Leaf Senescence in Yeast Acid Invertase Transgenic Tobacco Plants. Plant Journal 4: 179-189
Doehlert DC, Felker FC (1987) Characterisation and distribution of invertase activity in
developing maize (Zea mays) kernels. Physiol Plant 70: 51-57 Ehness R, Ecker M, Godt DE, Roitsch T (1997) Glucose and Stress Independently Regulate
Source and Sink Metabolism and Defense Mechanisms via Signal Transduction Pathways Involving Protein Phosphorylation. The Plant Cell 9: 1825-1841
Ehness R, Roitsch T (1997) Co-ordinated induction of mRNAs for extracellular invertase and a
glucose transporter in Chenopodium rubrum by cytokinins. Plant Journal 11: 539-548 Farquhar GD, Caemmerer SV, Berry JA (1980) A Biochemical-Model of Photosynthetic Co2
Assimilation in Leaves of C-3 Species. Planta 149: 78-90 Faye L, Berjonneau C, Rollin P (1981) Studies on β−fructosidase from radish seedlings I.
Purification and partial characterization. Plant Science Letters 22: 77-87 Faye L, Ghorbel A (1983) Studies on β-fructosidase from radish seedlings. Plant Science
Letters 29: 33-48 Feldbrugge M, Arizti P, Sullivan ML, Zamore PD, Belasco JG, Green PJ (2002)
Comparative analysis of the plant mRNA-destabilizing element, DST, in mammalian and tobacco cells. Plant Molecular Biology 49: 215-223
Filichkin SA, DiFazio SP, Brunner AM, Davis JM, Yang ZK, Kalluri UC, Arias RS,
Etherington E, Tuskan GA, Strauss SH (2007) Efficiency of gene silencing in Arabidopsis: direct inverted repeats vs. transitive RNAi vectors. Plant Biotechnol J 5: 615-626
Fotopoulos V, Gilbert MJ, Pittman JK, Marvier AC, Buchanan AJ, Sauer N, Hall JL,
Williams LE (2003) The monosaccharide transporter gene, AtSTP4, and the cell-wall invertase, At beta fruct1, are induced in Arabidopsis during infection with the fungal biotroph Erysiphe cichoracearum. Plant Physiology 132: 821-829
Fridman E, Zamir D (2003) Functional divergence of a syntenic invertase gene family in
tomato, potato, and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 131: 603-609 Gabriel O, Wang SF (1969) Determination of Enzymatic Activity in Polyacrylamide Gels .I.
Enzymes Catalyzing Conversion of Nonreducing Substrates to Reducing Products. Analytical Biochemistry 27: 545-&
Gens JS, Fujiki M, Pickard BG (2000) Arabinogalactan protein and wall-associated kinase in a
plasmalemmal reticulum with specialized vertices. Protoplasma 212: 115-134
135
Gil P, Green PJ (1996) Multiple regions of the Arabidopsis SAUR-AC1 gene control transcript
abundance: The 3' untranslated region functions as an mRNA instability determinant. Embo Journal 15: 1678-1686
Giovane A, Servillo L, Balestrieri C, Raiola A, D'Avino R, Tamburrini M, Clardiello MA,
Camardella L (2004) Pectin methylesterase inhibitor. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Proteins and Proteomics 1696: 245-252
Gleave AP (1992) A versatile binary vector system with a T-DNA organisational structure
conducive to efficient integration of cloned DNA into the plant genome. Plant Mol Biol 20: 1203-1207
Godt DE, Roitsch T (1997a) Regulation and tissue-specific distribution of mRNAs for three
extracellular invertase isoenzymes of tomato suggests an important function in establishing and maintaining sink metabolism. Plant Physiology 115: 273-282
Godt DE, Roitsch T (1997b) Regulation and tissue-specific distribution of mRNAs for three
extracellular invertase isoenzymes of tomato suggests an important function in establishing and maintaining sink metabolism. Plant Physiol 115: 273-282
Goetz M, Godt DE, Roitsch T (2000) Tissue-specific induction of the mRNA for an
extracellular invertase isoenzyme of tomato by brassinosteroids suggests a role for steroid hormones in assimilate partitioning. Plant Journal 22: 515-522
Goldstein A, Lampen JO (1975) Beta-D-fructofuranoside from yeast. Methods in Enzymology
42: 504-511 Gonzalez MC, Roitsch T, Cejudo FJ (2005) Circadian and developmental regulation of
vacuolar invertase expression in petioles of sugar beet plants. Planta 222: 386-395 Goupil P, Croisille Y, Croisille F, Ledoigt G (1988) Jerusalem artichoke invertases -
immunocharacterization of a soluble form and its putative precursors. Plant Science 54: 45-54
Greenwood JS, Helm M, Gietl C (2005) Ricinosomes and endosperm transfer cell structure in
programmed cell death of the nucellus during Ricinus seed development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 2238-2243
Greiner S, Krausgrill S, Rausch T (1998) Cloning of a tobacco apoplasmic invertase inhibitor -
Proof of function of the recombinant protein and expression analysis during plant development. Plant Physiology 116: 733-742
Greiner S, Rausch T, Sonnewald U, Herbers K (1999) Ectopic expression of a tobacco
invertase inhibitor homolog prevents cold-induced sweetening of potato tubers. Nat Biotechnol 17: 708-711
136
Gruis DF, Schulze J, Jung R (2004) Storage protein accumulation in the absence of the
vacuolar processing enzyme family of cysteine proteases. Plant Cell 16: 270-290 Grusak MA, Beebe DU, Turgeon R (1996) Phloem loading. Marcel Dekker, New York Halford NG (2006) Regulation of carbon and amino acid metabolism: Roles of sucrose
nonfermenting-1-related protein kinase-1 and general control nonderepressible-2-related protein kinase. Advances in Botanical Research, Vol 43 43: 93-+
Halford NG, Paul MJ (2003) Carbon metabolite sensing and signalling. Plant Biotechnology
Journal 1: 381-398 Hall JL, Williams LE (2000) Assimilate transport and partitioning in fungal biotrophic
interactions. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 549-560 Haouazine-Takvorian N, Tymowska-Lalanne Z, Takvorian A, Tregear J, Lejeune B,
Lecharny A, Kreis M (1997) Characterization of two members of the Arabidopsis thaliana gene family, At beta fruct3 and At beta fruct4 coding for vacuolar invertases. Gene 197: 239-251
Hardin SC, Tang GQ, Scholz A, Holtgraewe D, Winter H, Huber SC (2003) Phosphorylation
of sucrose synthase at serine 170: occurrence and possible role as a signal for proteolysis. Plant Journal 35: 588-603
Harley PC, Sharkey TD (1991) An Improved Model of C3 Photosynthesis at High Co2 -
Reversed O-2 Sensitivity Explained by Lack of Glycerate Reentry into the Chloroplast. Photosynthesis Research 27: 169-178
Harley PC, Thomas RB, Reynolds JF, Strain BR (1992) Modeling Photosynthesis of Cotton
Grown in Elevated Co2. Plant Cell and Environment 15: 271-282 Hayashi Y, Yamada K, Shimada T, Matsushima R, Nishizawa NK, Nishimura M, Hara-
Nishimura I (2001) A proteinase-storing body that prepares for cell death or stresses in the epidermal cells of Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology 42: 894-899
He X, Kermode AR (2003) Proteases associated with programmed cell death of
megagametophyte cells after germination of white spruce (Picea glauca) seeds. Plant Molecular Biology 52: 729-744
He ZH, Cheeseman I, He DZ, Kohorn BD (1999) A cluster of five cell wall-associated
receptor kinase genes, Wak1-5, are expressed in specific organs of Arabidopsis. Plant Molecular Biology 39: 1189-1196
He ZH, Fujiki M, Kohorn BD (1996) A cell wall-associated, receptor-like protein kinase.
Journal of Biological Chemistry 271: 19789-19793
137
Heineke D, Sonnewald U, Bussis D, Gunter G, Leidreiter K, Wilke I, Raschke K,
Willmitzer L, Heldt HW (1992) Apoplastic expression of yeast-derived invertase in potato. Plant Physiol 100: 301-308
Herbers K, Takahata Y, Melzer M, Mock HP, Hajirezaei MR, Sonnewald U (2000)
Regulation of carbohydrate partitioning during the interaction of potato virus Y with tobacco. Molecular Plant Pathology 1: 51-59
Hirose T, Takano M, Terao T (2002) Cell wall invertase in developing rice caryopsis:
Molecular cloning of OsCIN1 and analysis of its expression in relation to its role in grain filling. Plant and Cell Physiology 43: 452-459
Hokamp K, McLysaght A, Wolfe KH (2003) The 2R Hypothesis and the Human Genome.
Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics 3: 95-110 Hothorn M, D'Angelo I, Marquez JA, Greiner S, Scheffzek K (2004a) The invertase inhibitor
Nt-CIF from tobacco: A highly thermostable four-helix bundle with an unusual N-terminal extension. Journal of Molecular Biology 335: 987-995
Hothorn M, Scheffzek K (2006) Multiple crystal forms of the cell-wall invertase inhibitor from
tobacco support high conformational rigidity over a broad pH range. Acta Crystallographica Section D-Biological Crystallography 62: 665-670
Hothorn M, Wolf S, Aloy P, Greiner S, Scheffzek K (2004b) Structural insights into the target
specificity of plant invertase and pectin methylesterase inhibitory proteins. Plant Cell 16: 3437-3447
Huang LF (2006) Molecular analysis of an acid invertase gene family in Arabidopsis.
Dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Huang L-F, Bocock PN, Davis JM, Koch KE (2007) Regulation of invertase: a 'suite' of
transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. Functional Plant Biology 34: 499-507
Huang YH, Picha DH, Kilili AW, Johnson CE (1999) Changes in invertase activities and
reducing sugar content in sweetpotato stored at different temperatures. J Agric Food Chem 47: 4927-4931
Irish VF (2003) The evolution of floral homeotic gene function. Bioessays 25: 637-646 Ji XM, Van den Ende W, Van Laere A, Cheng SH, Bennett J (2005) Structure, evolution, and
expression of the two invertase gene families of rice. Journal of Molecular Evolution 60: 615-634
138
Johnson MA, Perez-Amador MA, Lidder P, Green PJ (2000) Mutants of Arabidopsis defective in a sequence-specific mRNA degradation pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97: 13991-13996
Johnston M (1999) Feasting, fasting and fermenting - glucose sensing in yeast and other cells.
Trends in Genetics 15: 29-33 Kaufman PB, Song I, Pharis RP (1985) Gravity perception and response mechanism in
graviresponding cereal grass shoots., Vol 2. Agro Botanical, Bikaner, India Keil M, Sanchezserrano J, Schell J, Willmitzer L (1986) Primary Structure of a Proteinase
Inhibitor-Ii Gene from Potato (Solanum-Tuberosum). Nucleic Acids Research 14: 5641-5650
Kig C, Turkel S, Temizkan G (2005) Isolation and characterization of glucose derepressed
invertase mutants from Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry 69: 2475-2478
Kim JH, Brachet V, Moriya H, Johnston M (2006) Integration of transcriptional and
posttranslational regulation in a glucose signal transduction pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryotic Cell 5: 167-173
Koch K (2004) Sucrose metabolism: regulatory mechanisms and pivotal roles in sugar sensing
and plant development. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7: 235-246 Koch K, Zeng Y (2002) Molecular approaches to altered C partitioning: Genes for sucrose
metabolism. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 127: 474-483 Koch KE (1996) Carbohydrate-modulated gene expression in plants. Annual Review of Plant
Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47: 509-540 Kohorn BD, Kobayashi M, Johansen S, Friedman HP, Fischer A, Byers N (2006a) Wall-
associated kinase 1 (WAK1) is crosslinked in endomembranes, and transport to the cell surface requires correct cell-wall synthesis. Journal of Cell Science 119: 2282-2290
Kohorn BD, Kobayashi M, Johansen S, Riese J, Huang LF, Koch K, Fu S, Dotson A, Byers
N (2006b) An Arabidopsis cell wall-associated kinase required for invertase activity and cell growth. Plant Journal 46: 307-316
Kramer EM, Dorit RL, Irish VF (1998) Molecular evolution of genes controlling petal and
stamen development: Duplication and divergence within the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA MADS-box gene lineages. Genetics 149: 765-783
Krausgrill S, Sander A, Greiner S, Weil M, Rausch T (1996) Regulation of cell wall invertase
by a proteinaceous inhibitor. Journal of Experimental Botany 47: 1193-1198
139
Krishnan HB, Blanchette JT, Okita TW (1985) Wheat invertase. Characterization of cell wall bound and soluble forms. Plant Physiol 78: 241-245
Kuiper D (1993) Sink Strength - Established and Regulated by Plant-Growth Regulators. Plant
Cell and Environment 16: 1025-1026 Lally D, Ingmire P, Tong HY, He ZH (2001) Antisense expression of a cell wall-associated
protein kinase, WAK4, inhibits cell elongation and alters morphology. Plant Cell 13: 1317-1331
Lalonde S, Wipf D, Frommer WB (2004) Transport mechanisms for organic forms of carbon
and nitrogen between source and sink. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55: 341-372 Lauriere C, Lauriere M, Sturm A, Faye L, Chrispeels MJ (1988) Characterization of beta-
fructosidase, an extracellular glycoprotein of carrot cells. Biochimie 70: 1483-1491 Lawrence SD, Greenwood JS, Korhnak TE, Davis JM (1997) A vegetative storage protein
homolog is expressed in the growing shoot apex of hybrid poplar. Planta 203: 237-244 Lee HS, Sturm A (1996) Purification and characterization of neutral and alkaline invertase from
carrot. Plant Physiology 112: 1513-1522 Leple JC, Brasileiro ACM, Michel MF, Delmotte F, Jouanin L (1992) Transgenic Poplars -
Expression of Chimeric Genes Using 4 Different Constructs. Plant Cell Reports 11: 137-141
Li WH, Gojobori T, Nei M (1981) Pseudogenes as a Paradigm of Neutral Evolution. Nature
292: 237-239 Linden JC, Ehness R, Roitsch T (1996) Regulation by ethylene of apoplastic invertase
expression in Chenopodium rubrum tissue culture cells. Plant Growth Regulation 19: 219-222
Link M, Rausch T, Greiner S (2004) In Arabidopsis thaliana, the invertase inhibitors AtC/VIF1
and 2 exhibit distinct target enzyme specificities and expression profiles. Febs Letters 573: 105-109
Litt A, Irish VF (2003) Duplication and diversification in the APETALA1/FRUITFULL floral
homeotic gene lineage: Implications for the evolution of floral development. Genetics 165: 821-833
Long JC, Zhao W, Rashotte AM, Muday GK, Huber SC (2002) Gravity-stimulated changes
in auxin and invertase gene expression in maize pulvinal cells. Plant Physiology 128: 591-602
140
Lorenz K, Lienhard S, Sturm A (1995) Structural Organization and Differential Expression of Carrot Beta-Fructofuranosidase Genes - Identification of a Gene Coding for a Flower Bud-Specific Isozyme. Plant Molecular Biology 28: 189-194
Lynch M, Conery JS (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes.
Science 290: 1151-1155 Margulis L (1981) Symbiosis in Cell Evolution. Freeman, San Francisco Margulis L, Sagan D (2003) Acquiring genomes: the theory of the origins of the species. Basic
Books, New York Martz E (2002) Protein Explorer: Easy Yet Powerful Macromolecular Visualization. Trends in
Biochemical Sciences 27: 107-109. http://proteinexplorer.org Matsushima R, Kondo M, Nishimura M, Hara-Nishimura I (2003) A novel ER-derived
compartment, the ER body, selectively accumulates a beta-glucosidase with an ER-retention signal in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal 33: 493-502
Mccarrey JR, Riggs AD (1986) Determinator-Inhibitor Pairs as a Mechanism for Threshold
Setting in Development - a Possible Function for Pseudogenes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 83: 679-683
Mereschkowsky C (1905) Über Natur und Ursprung der Chromatophoren im Pflanzenreiche.
Biol. Zentralbl. 25: 593-604 Micheli F (2001) Pectin methylesterases: cell wall enzymes with important roles in plant
physiology. Trends in Plant Science 6: 414-419 Morse AM, Tschaplinski TJ, Dervinis C, Pijut P, Schmelz EA, Day W, Davis JM (2007)
Salicylate and catechol levels are maintained in nahG transgenic poplar. Phytochemistry 68: 2043-2052
Munch E (1930) Die Stoffbewegungen in der Pflanze. Gustav Fischer, Jena Nakaune S, Yamada K, Kondo M, Kato T, Tabata S, Nishimura M, Hara-Nishimura I
(2005) A vacuolar processing enzyme, delta VPE, is involved in seed coat formation at the early stage of seed development. Plant Cell 17: 876-887
Neuhaus J-M, Rogers JC (1998) Sorting of proteins to vacuoles in plant cells. Plant Mol Biol
38: 127-144 Neuhaus JM, Sticher L, Meins F, Boller T (1991) A Short C-Terminal Sequence Is Necessary
and Sufficient for the Targeting of Chitinases to the Plant Vacuole. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 88: 10362-10366
141
Newman TC, Ohmetakagi M, Taylor CB, Green PJ (1993) Dst Sequences, Highly Conserved among Plant Saur Genes, Target Reporter Transcripts for Rapid Decay in Tobacco. Plant Cell 5: 701-714
Ohyama A, Ito H, Sato T, Nishimura S, Imai T, Hirai M (1995) Suppression of Acid
Invertase Activity by Antisense RNA Modifies the Sugar Composition of Tomato Fruit. Plant Cell Physiol 36: 369-376
Ohyama A, Nishimura S, Hirai M (1998) Cloning of cDNA for a cell wall-bound acid
invertase from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and expression of soluble and cell wall-bound invertases in plants and wounded leaves of L-esculentum and L-peruvianum. Genes & Genetic Systems 73: 149-157
Otto S, Whitton J (2000) Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 34:
401-437 Page RDM (1996) TreeView: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal
computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 12: 357-358 Palomino A, Herrero P, Moreno F (2005) Rgt1, a glucose sensing transcription factor, is
required for transcriptional repression of the HXK2 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemical Journal 388: 697-703
Pan QH, Li MJ, Peng CC, Zhang N, Zou X, Zou KQ, Wang XL, Yu XC, Wang XF, Zhang
DP (2005) Abscisic acid activates acid invertases in developing grape berry. Physiologia Plantarum 125: 157-170
Peirson SN, Butler JN, Foster RG (2003) Experimental validation of novel and conventional
approaches to quantitative real-time PCR data analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 31: - Perlman D, Halvorson HO, Cannon LE (1982) Pre-Secretory and Cytoplasmic Invertase
Polypeptides Encoded by Distinct Messenger-Rnas Derived from the Same Structural Gene Differ by a Signal Sequence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America-Biological Sciences 79: 781-785
Pons T, Olmea O, Chinea G, Beldarrain A, Marquez G, Acosta N, Rodriguez L, Valencia A
(1998) Structural model for family 32 of glycosyl-hydrolase enzymes. Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 33: 383-395
Pressey R, Shaw R (1966) Effect of Temperature on Invertase Invertase Inhibitor and Sugars in
Potato Tubers. Plant Physiology 41: 1657-1661 Proels RK, Hause B, Berger S, Roitsch T (2003) Novel mode of hormone induction of tandem
tomato invertase genes in floral tissues. Plant Mol Biol 52: 191-201
142
Purcell PC, Smith AM, Halford NG (1998) Antisense expression of a sucrose non-fermenting-1-related protein kinase sequence in potato results in decreased expression of sucrose synthase in tubers and loss of sucrose-inducibility of sucrose synthase transcripts in leaves. Plant Journal 14: 195-202
Ramloch-Lorenz K, Knudsen S, Sturm A (1993) Molecular characterization of the gene for
carrot cell wall beta-fructosidase. Plant J 4: 545-554 Rausch T, Greiner S (2004) Plant protein inhibitors of invertases. Biochimica Et Biophysica
Acta-Proteins and Proteomics 1696: 253-261 Reymond P, Farmer EE (1998) Jasmonate and salicylate as global signals for defense gene
expression. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 1: 404-411 Reymond P, Weber H, Damond M, Farmer EE (2000) Differential gene expression in
response to mechanical wounding and insect feeding in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12: 707-719
Roitsch T (1999) Source-sink regulation by sugar and stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology
2: 198-206 Roitsch T, Balibrea ME, Hofmann M, Proels R, Sinha AK (2003) Extracellular invertase: key
metabolic enzyme and PR protein. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 513-524 Roitsch T, Bittner M, Godt DE (1995) Induction of Apoplastic Invertase of Chenopodium-
Rubrum by D-Glucose and a Glucose Analog and Tissue-Specific Expression Suggest a Role in Sink-Source Regulation. Plant Physiology 108: 285-294
Roitsch T, Ehness R (2000) Regulation of source/sink relations by cytokinins. Plant Growth
Regulation 32: 359-367 Roitsch T, Gonzalez MC (2004) Function and regulation of plant invertases: sweet sensations.
Trends in Plant Science 9: 606-613 Rojo E, Martin R, Carter C, Zouhar J, Pan SQ, Plotnikova J, Jin HL, Paneque M,
Sanchez-Serrano JJ, Baker B, Ausubel FM, Raikhel NV (2004) VPE gamma exhibits a caspase-like activity that contributes to defense against pathogens. Current Biology 14: 1897-1906
Rojo E, Zouhar J, Carter C, Kovaleva V, Raikhel NV (2003) A unique mechanism for protein
processing and degradation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 7389-7394
Rolland F, Moore B, Sheen J (2002) Sugar sensing and signaling in plants. Plant Cell 14:
S185-S205
143
Rolland F, Sheen J (2005) Sugar sensing and signalling networks in plants. Biochemical Society Transactions 33: 269-271
Ronen M, Botstein D (2006) Transcriptional response of steady-state yeast cultures to transient
perturbations in carbon source. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 389-394
Rook F, Gerrits N, Kortstee A, van Kampen M, Borrias M, Weisbeek P, Smeekens S (1998)
Sucrose-specific signalling represses translation of the Arabidopsis ATB2 bZIP transcription factor gene. Plant Journal 15: 253-263
Rose TL, Bonneau L, Der C, Marty-Mazars D, Marty F (2006) Starvation-induced
expression of autophagy-related genes in Arabidopsis. Biology of the Cell 98: 53-67 Rosenkranz H, Vogel R, Greiner S, Rausch T (2001) In wounded sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)
tap-root, hexose accumulation correlates with the induction of a vacuolar invertase isoform. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 2381-2385
Ruffner HP, Geissmann M, Rast DM (1992) Plant and Fungal Invertases in Grape Berries
Infected with Botrytis-Cinerea. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 40: 181-189 Sankoff D (2001) Gene and genome duplication. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
11: 681-684 Schmid M, Simpson DJ, Sarioglu H, Lottspeich F, Gietl C (2001) The ricinosomes of
senescing plant tissue bud from the endoplasmic reticulum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 5353-5358
Sergeeva LI, Keurentjes JJB, Bentsink L, Vonk J, van der Plas LHW, Koornneef M,
Vreugdenhil D (2006) Vacuolar invertase regulates elongation of Arabidopsis thaliana roots as revealed by QTL and mutant analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 2994-2999
Sharkey TD (1985) Photosynthesis in Intact Leaves of C-3 Plants - Physics, Physiology and
Rate Limitations. Botanical Review 51: 53-105 Sherson SM, Alford HL, Forbes SM, Wallace G, Smith SM (2003) Roles of cell-wall
invertases and monosaccharide transporters in the growth and development of Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 525-531
Singh R, Knox RB (1984) Invertase of Lilium pollen. Characterization and activity during in
vitro germination. Plant Physiol 74: 510-515 Sinha AK, Hofmann MG, Romer U, Kockenberger W, Elling L, Roitsch T (2002)
Metabolizable and non-metabolizable sugars activate different signal transduction pathways in tomato. Plant Physiology 128: 1480-1489
144
Smeekens S (2000) Sugar-induced signal transduction in plants. Annual Review of Plant
Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 51: 49-81 Sonnewald U, Brauer M, von Schaewen A, Stitt M, Willmitzer L (1991) Transgenic tobacco
plants expressing yeast-derived invertase in either the cytosol, vacuole or apoplast: a powerful tool for studying sucrose metabolism and sink/source interactions. Plant J 1: 95-106
Sonnewald U, Vonschaewen A, Willmitzer L (1993) Subcellular Manipulation of Sucrose
Metabolism in Transgenic Plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 44: 293-296 Sterck L, Rombauts S, Jansson S, Sterky F, Rouze P, Van de Peer Y (2005) EST data
suggest that poplar is an ancient polyploid. New Phytologist 167: 165-170 Stessman DJ (2004) Carbohydrate partitioning and photosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. PhD
Dissertation. Iowa State University, Ames, IA Stommel JR, Simon PW (1990) Multiple forms of invertase from Daucus carota cell cultures.
Phytochemistry 29: 2087-2089 Storey JD, Tibshirani R (2003) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 9440-9445 Sturm A (1996) Molecular characterization and functional analysis of sucrose-cleaving enzymes
in carrot (Daucus carota L). Journal of Experimental Botany 47: 1187-1192 Sturm A (1999) Invertases. Primary structures, functions, and roles in plant development and
sucrose partitioning. Plant Physiology 121: 1-7 Sturm A, Chrispeels MJ (1990a) cDNA cloning of carrot extracellular beta-fructosidase and its
expression in response to wounding and bacterial infection. Plant Cell 2: 1107-1119 Sturm A, Chrispeels MJ (1990b) Cdna Cloning of Carrot Extracellular Beta-Fructosidase and
Its Expression in Response to Wounding and Bacterial-Infection. Plant Cell 2: 1107-1119 Sturm A, Tang GQ (1999) The sucrose-cleaving enzymes of plants are crucial for development,
growth and carbon partitioning. Trends in Plant Science 4: 401-407 Sullivan ML, Green PJ (1996) Mutational analysis of the DST element in tobacco cells and
transgenic plants: Identification of residues critical for mRNA instability. Rna-a Publication of the Rna Society 2: 308-315
Swofford DL (1993) Paup - a Computer-Program for Phylogenetic Inference Using Maximum
Parsimony. Journal of General Physiology 102: A9-A9
145
Tang GQ, Luscher M, Sturm A (1999) Antisense repression of vacuolar and cell wall invertase in transgenic carrot alters early plant development and sucrose partitioning. Plant Cell 11: 177-189
Tang GQ, Sturm A (1999) Antisense repression of sucrose synthase in carrot (Daucus carota
L.) affects growth rather than sucrose partitioning. Plant Mol Biol 41: 465-479 Taussig R, Carlson M (1983) Nucleotide-Sequence of the Yeast Suc2 Gene for Invertase.
Nucleic Acids Research 11: 1943-1954 Tomlinson KL, McHugh S, Labbe H, Grainger JL, James LE, Pomeroy KM, Mullin JW,
Miller SS, Dennis DT, Miki BLA (2004) Evidence that the hexose-to-sucrose ratio does not control the switch to storage product accumulation in oilseeds: analysis of tobacco seed development and effects of overexpressing apoplastic invertase. Journal of Experimental Botany 55: 2291-2303
Trouverie J, Chateau-Joubert S, Thevenot C, Jacquemot MP, Prioul JL (2004) Regulation
of vacuolar invertase by abscisic acid or glucose in leaves and roots from maize plantlets. Planta 219: 894-905
Trouverie J, Thevenot C, Rocher JP, Sotta B, Prioul JL (2003) The role of abscisic acid in
the response of a specific vacuolar invertase to water stress in the adult maize leaf. J Exp Bot 54: 2177-2186
Troyanovsky SM, Leube RE (1994) Activation of the Silent Human Cytokeratin-17
Pseudogene-Promoter Region by Cryptic Enhancer Elements of the Cytokeratin-17 Gene. European Journal of Biochemistry 225: 61-69
Turgeon R (1989) The Sink-Source Transition in Leaves. Annual Review of Plant Physiology
and Plant Molecular Biology 40: 119-138 Turgeon R, Hepler PK (1989) Symplastic Continuity between Mesophyll and Companion Cells
in Minor Veins of Mature Cucurbita-Pepo L Leaves. Planta 179: 24-31 Turgeon R, Medville R (1998) The absence of phloem loading in willow leaves. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95: 12055-12060 Tuskan GA, DiFazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, Hellsten U, Putnam N, Ralph
S, Rombauts S, Salamov A, Schein J, Sterck L, Aerts A, Bhalerao RR, Bhalerao RP, Blaudez D, Boerjan W, Brun A, Brunner A, Busov V, Campbell M, Carlson J, Chalot M, Chapman J, Chen GL, Cooper D, Coutinho PM, Couturier J, Covert S, Cronk Q, Cunningham R, Davis J, Degroeve S, Dejardin A, Depamphilis C, Detter J, Dirks B, Dubchak I, Duplessis S, Ehlting J, Ellis B, Gendler K, Goodstein D, Gribskov M, Grimwood J, Groover A, Gunter L, Hamberger B, Heinze B, Helariutta Y, Henrissat B, Holligan D, Holt R, Huang W, Islam-Faridi N, Jones S, Jones-Rhoades M, Jorgensen R, Joshi C, Kangasjarvi J, Karlsson J, Kelleher C,
146
Kirkpatrick R, Kirst M, Kohler A, Kalluri U, Larimer F, Leebens-Mack J, Leple JC, Locascio P, Lou Y, Lucas S, Martin F, Montanini B, Napoli C, Nelson DR, Nelson C, Nieminen K, Nilsson O, Pereda V, Peter G, Philippe R, Pilate G, Poliakov A, Razumovskaya J, Richardson P, Rinaldi C, Ritland K, Rouze P, Ryaboy D, Schmutz J, Schrader J, Segerman B, Shin H, Siddiqui A, Sterky F, Terry A, Tsai CJ, Uberbacher E, Unneberg P, Vahala J, Wall K, Wessler S, Yang G, Yin T, Douglas C, Marra M, Sandberg G, de Peer YV, Rokhsar D (2006) The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313: 1596-1604
Tymowska-Lalanne Z, Kreis M (1998a) Expression of the Arabidopsis thaliana invertase gene
family. Planta 207: 259-265 Tymowska-Lalanne Z, Kreis M (1998b) The plant invertases: Physiology, biochemistry and
molecular biology. Advances in Botanical Research, Vol 28 28: 71-117 Unger C, Hardegger M, Lienhard S, Sturm A (1994) Cdna Cloning of Carrot (Daucus-Carota)
Soluble Acid Beta-Fructofuranosidases and Comparison with the Cell-Wall Isoenzyme. Plant Physiology 104: 1351-1357
Unger C, Hofsteenge J, Sturm A (1992) Purification and characterization of a soluble beta-
fructofuranosidase from Daucus carota. Eur J Biochem 204: 915-921 Van den Ende W, Michiels A, Le Roy K, Van Laere A (2002) Cloning of a vacuolar invertase
from Belgian endive leaves (Cichorium intybus). Physiologia Plantarum 115: 504-512 Van den Ende W, Van Laere A (1995) Purification and Properties of a Neutral Invertase from
the Roots of Cichorium-Intybus. Physiologia Plantarum 93: 241-248 Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F
(2002) Accurate normalisation of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Gen. Biol. 3: 1-12
Vargas W, Cumino A, Salerno GL (2003) Cyanobacterial alkaline/neutral invertases. Origin of
sucrose hydrolysis in the plant cytosol? Planta 216: 951-960 Verica JA, He ZH (2002) The cell wall-associated kinase (WAK) and WAK-like kinase gene
family. Plant Physiology 129: 455-459 Voegele RT, Wirsel S, Moll U, Lechner M, Mendgen K (2006) Cloning and characterization
of a novel invertase from the obligate biotroph Uromyces fabae and analysis of expression patterns of host and pathogen invertases in the course of infection. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 19: 625-634
Von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981) Some Relationships between the Biochemistry of
Photosynthesis and the Gas-Exchange of Leaves. Planta 153: 376-387
147
Von Schaewen A, Stitt M, Schmidt R, Sonnewald U, Willmitzer L (1990) Expression of a yeast-derived invertase in the cell wall of tobacco and Arabidopsis plants leads to accumulation of carbohydrate and inhibition of photosynthesis and strongly influences growth and phenotype of transgenic tobacco plants. Embo J 9: 3033-3044
Wachter R, Langhans M, Aloni R, Gotz S, Weilmunster A, Koops A, Temguia L, Mistrik I,
Pavlovkin J, Rascher U, Schwalm K, Koch KE, Ullrich CI (2003) Vascularization, high-volume solution flow, and localized roles for enzymes of sucrose metabolism during tumorigenesis by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiology 133: 1024-1037
Wagner TA, Kohorn BD (2001) Wall-associated kinases are expressed throughout plant
development and are required for cell expansion. Plant Cell 13: 303-318 Walcroft AS, Whitehead D, Silvester WB, Kelliher FM (1997) The response of
photosynthetic model parameters to temperature and nitrogen concentration in Pinus radiata D. Don. Plant Cell and Environment 20: 1338-1348
Wardlaw IF (1990) Tansley Review No 27 - the Control of Carbon Partitioning in Plants. New
Phytologist 116: 341-381 Weil M, Rausch T (1990) Cell wall invertase in tobacco crown gall cells. Plant Physiol 94:
1575-1581 Wendel JF (2000) Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Molecular Biology 42: 225-249 Winter H, Huber SC (2000) Regulation of sucrose metabolism in higher plants: Localization
and regulation of activity of key enzymes. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 35: 253-289
Wu LL, Song I, Karuppiah N, Kaufman PB (1993a) Kinetic induction of oat shoot pulvinus
invertase mRNA by gravistimulation and partial cDNA cloning by the polymerase chain reaction. Plant Mol Biol 21: 1175-1179
Wu LL, Song I, Kim D, Kaufman PB (1993b) Molecular basis of the increase in invertase
activity elicited by gravistimulation of oat-shoot pulvini. J Plant Physiol 142: 179-183 Xiao WY, Sheen J, Jang JC (2000) The role of hexokinase in plant sugar signal transduction
and growth and development. Plant Molecular Biology 44: 451-461 Xu J, Avigne WT, McCarty DR, Koch KE (1996) A similar dichotomy of sugar modulation
and developmental expression affects both paths of sucrose metabolism: Evidence from a maize invertase gene family. Plant Cell 8: 1209-1220
Zahn LM, King HZ, Leebens-Mack JH, Kim S, Soltis PS, Landherr LL, Soltis DE,
dePamphilis CW, Ma H (2005) The evolution of the SEPALLATA subfamily of
148
MADS-Box genes: A preangiosperm origin with multiple duplications throughout angiosperm history. Genetics 169: 2209-2223
Zeng Y, Wu Y, Avigne WT, Koch KE (1999) Rapid repression of maize invertases by low
oxygen. Invertase/sucrose synthase balance, sugar signaling potential, and seedling survival. Plant Physiology 121: 599-608
Zhang L, Cohn NS, Mitchell JP (1996) Induction of a pea cell-wall invertase gene by
wounding and its localized expression in phloem. Plant Physiology 112: 1111-1117 Zhang SB, Chen C, Li L, Meng L, Singh J, Jiang N, Deng XW, He ZH, Lemaux PG (2005)
Evolutionary expansion, gene structure, and expression of the rice wall-associated kinase gene family. Plant Physiology 139: 1107-1124
Zouaghi M, Rollin P (1976) Phytochrome controls of beta fructosidase activity in radish.
Phytochemistry 15: 897-901 Zrenner R, Schuler K, Sonnewald U (1996) Soluble acid invertase determines the hexose-to-
sucrose ratio in cold-stored potato tubers. Planta 198: 246-252
149
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
Philip Bocock was born May 20, 1979 in Wilmington, Delaware. He was raised in Austin,
Texas where he attended Westwood High School. He graduated high school in 1997 and entered
Texas A&M University in September of the same year. He earned his Bachelor of Science in
biochemistry and genetics accompanied with a minor in forest science in May of 2001.
In the fall of 2001, Philip began work on a PhD in the Plant Molecular and Cellular
Biology Program at the University of Florida. At the University of Florida, Philip entered the
laboratory of Dr. John Davis and began conducting research on carbon allocation and
partitioning using the model tree, Populus. Under the tutelage of Dr. John Davis, Philip
identified the members of the poplar invertase gene family and subsequently employed a variety
of techniques to seek to understand the role this enzymatic family plays in carbon allocation and
partitioning in poplar. The work detailed in this dissertation was entirely conducted in the
laboratory of Dr. John Davis.