igs workshop 2016 beidou.ppt [mode de compatibilité] - ps0701 - laurichesse.pdf · 1xpehu ri...

1
Number of triple-frequency satellites in view for a given location (september 2015) Introduction PPP is a relatively new but powerful technique for positioning. The main difference between PPP and standard positioning is the use of the carrier-phase measurements, whose noise is lower by two orders of magnitude than the code measurements. It is now widely accepted that PPP techniques can achieve centimeter accuracy globally in real-time, in particular when they are combined with phase integer ambiguity resolution. However, one important drawback of the PPP is the convergence time. Dual-frequency PPP convergence is long, tens of minutes, which makes it impracticable for many applications. However, with the development of the modernized GPS, Galileo and the Beidou constellations, a third frequency is now available on a growing number of satellites. For example, for a user located in the Asia-Pacific region, there can be nowadays more than 15 triple-frequency satellites in view. In this poster, we explore the different measurements combination possibilities offered by the new triple-frequency signals, namely with the availability of “widelanes-only” intermediate combinations. By performing a noise analysis based on actual measurements, we show that the different characteristics of the combinations are compatible with a very fast ambiguity resolution, on all the constellations. Noise and combination analysis Beidou code anomaly Fast PPP convergence using multi-constellations and triple-frequency ambiguity resolution D. Laurichesse Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, Toulouse A. Blot CS-SI, Toulouse Satellite biases estimation (widelane-only combination) User-side results References Formulation D. Laurichesse, F. Mercier, J.P. Berthias, P. Broca, L. Cerri, “Integer Ambiguity Resolution on Undifferenced GPS Phase Measurements and its Application to PPP and Satellite Precise Orbit Determination”, Navigation, Journal of the institute of Navigation, Vol. 56, N° 2, Summer 2009 P. Collins, S. Bisnath, F. Lahaye, P. Heroux, Undifferenced GPS Ambiguity Resolution Using the Decoupled Clock Model and Ambiguity Datum Fixing”, Navigation, Journal of the institute of Navigation, Vol. 57, N° 2, 2010 Beidou The BeiDou Navigation Message, Oliver Montenbruck, Peter Steigenberger, International Global Navigation Satellite Systems Society, IGNSS Symposium 2013 BeiDou satellite-induced code pseudorange variations: diagnosis and therapy, Lambert Wanninger, Susanne Beer, GPS Solutions, september 2014 ION 2015An Open-source PPP Client Implementation for the CNES PPP-WIZARD Demonstrator D. Laurichesse, A. Privat, ION GNSS 2015, Tampa, Florida Triple-frequency applications D. Laurichesse, "Phase biases estimation for integer ambiguity resolution", PPP-RTK & open standards Symposium , March 2012, Frankfurt am Main Tao Li, Jinling Wang, Denis Laurichesse, “Modelling and quality control for reliable precise point positioning integer ambiguity resolution with GNSS modernization”, GPS Solutions, October 2013 Handling the Biases for Improved Triple-Frequency PPP Convergence D. Laurichesse, GPS World, April 2015 issue Raw Beidou MW-Widelane (Double-differences) The proposed calibration works for the MW-Widelane combination Integer property of phase ambiguity is conserved Geo corrections are tricky to evaluate Constant elevation angles For the moment, no RTCM message to account for theses biases Conclusion GPS network Continuous estimation with 47 stations and 8 satellites The relatively high noise is consistent with the noise amplification factor of the combination User convergence time (JFNG, average over 10 runs) Methodology Frequency GPS Galileo Beidou A G1 E1 B1 B G2 E5a B3 C G5 E5b B2 Combination GPS WaveLength (m) Galileo WaveLength (m) Beidou WaveLength (m) MW Extra-widelane (B, C) 5.86 9.76 4.88 MW Widelane (A,B) 0.86 0.75 1.02 MW Widelane (A,C) 0.75 0.71 0.85 Widelane only1 3.40 3.21 4.52 Widelane only iono2 1.98 1.84 2.84 Frequency GPS Galileo Beidou A 3.4 3.2 4.5 B -20.7 28.8 -21.2 C 17.3 -32 16.7 GPS combinations noise Beidou combinations noise Conclusion The noise of GPS and Beidou measurements is compatible with ambiguity resolution on all frequencies Widelane-only phase combination is promising for triple- frequency-AR: Involves only differences of phase measurements Large wavelengths, fast convergence No dependency on wind-up effect kzn2 brst hofn kir8 nico metg reyk nya2 dyng tash gmsd ulab sgoc jfng ftna tow2 nrmg unx2 ous2 cut0 sin1 ohi3 cas1 krgg mas1 llag nklg sutm seyg reun harb cpvg ucal stfu unbd lmmf abmf aut0 areg koug scrz chpg lpgs rgdg thtg mao0 chof -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90 -180 -150 -120 -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 GPS MGEX network (47 stations) GPS biases cut0 pert karr samo ckis laut tong pngm kiri pohn xmis nium zim2 unb3 ptvl jfng kzn2 mro1 pen2 -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90 -180 -150 -120 -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Beidou MGEX network (19 stations) Beidou network Beidou biases Continuous estimation with 19 stations and 8 satellites (GEO and IGSO) Discontinuity for 3 MEOs outside Asia region Partial ambiguity fixing with triple-frequency measurements is already possible over Asia Widelane-only phase measurements is a good candidate for fast convergence in the triple-frequency context For Beidou, an elevation-dependent code variation must be taken into account Satellite biases computation for the widelane-only combination is possible using the current MGEX network, for both GPS and Beidou At the user-level, quasi-instantaneous ambiguity resolution is achieved, leading to a very fast convergence at the decimeter level The proposed RTCM message for phase biases is compatible with this approach Conclusions Small number of triple-frequency Beidou MGEX stations Upgrade of the CNES/Regina network for triple-frequency compatibility Network side: Computation of SSR representation for phase biases RTCM format Post-processed User-side: use of the PPP-Wizard client Real-time conditions in replay mode These biases are defined as the phase widelane-only combination of individual phase biases as defined in the RTCM phase bias message 1) Combination of phase widelanes that eliminates the ionosphere component, assuming the extra-widelane is fixed 2) Combination of phase widelanes that eliminates the geometry component, assuming the extra-widelane is fixed Noise amplification factors (widelane-only combination) Choice of frequencies Wavelengths of interesting combinations Epoch (30 s) Epoch (30 s) Wanninger 2014: Elevation-dependent code variations Amplitude ~1 meter Nature of this bias not fully understood yet Can be mitigated using predefined corrections Corrections tables are given for IGSO and MEO Possible explanation Corrected Beidou MW-Widelane (Double-differences) 30 sec

Upload: trinhnhi

Post on 26-Feb-2019

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Number of triple-frequency satellites in view for a given location(september 2015)

Introduction

PPP is a relatively new but powerful technique for positioning. The main difference between PPP and standard positioning is the use of the carrier-phase measurements, whose noise is lower by two orders of magnitude than the code measurements. It is now widely accepted that PPP techniques can achieve centimeter accuracy globally in real-time, in particular when they are combined with phase integer ambiguity resolution. However, one important drawback of the PPP is the convergence time. Dual-frequency PPP convergence is long, tens of minutes, which makes it impracticable for many applications.However, with the development of the modernized GPS, Galileo and the Beidou constellations, a third frequency is now available on a growing number of satellites. For example, for a user located in the Asia-Pacific region, there can be nowadays more than 15 triple-frequency satellites in view.In this poster, we explore the different measurements combination possibilities offered by the new triple-frequency signals, namely with the availability of “widelanes-only” intermediate combinations. By performing a noise analysis based on actual measurements, we show that the different characteristics of the combinations are compatible with a very fast ambiguity resolution, on all the constellations.

Noise and combination analysis

Beidou code anomaly

Fast PPP convergence using multi-constellations and triple-frequency ambiguity resolutionD. LaurichesseCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales, ToulouseA. BlotCS-SI, Toulouse

Satellite biases estimation (widelane-only combination)

User-side results

ReferencesFormulation

D. Laurichesse, F. Mercier, J.P. Berthias, P. Broca, L. Cerri, “Integer Ambiguity Resolution on Undifferenced GPS Phase Measurements and its Application to PPP and Satellite Precise Orbit Determination”, Navigation, Journal of the institute of Navigation, Vol. 56, N° 2, Summer 2009P. Collins, S. Bisnath, F. Lahaye, P. Heroux, “Undifferenced GPS Ambiguity Resolution Using the Decoupled Clock Model and Ambiguity Datum Fixing”, Navigation, Journal of the institute of Navigation, Vol. 57, N° 2, 2010

BeidouThe BeiDou Navigation Message, Oliver Montenbruck, Peter Steigenberger, International Global Navigation Satellite Systems Society, IGNSS Symposium 2013BeiDou satellite-induced code pseudorange variations: diagnosis and therapy, Lambert Wanninger, Susanne Beer, GPS Solutions, september 2014ION 2015An Open-source PPP Client Implementation for the CNES PPP-WIZARD DemonstratorD. Laurichesse, A. Privat, ION GNSS 2015, Tampa, Florida

Triple-frequency applicationsD. Laurichesse, "Phase biases estimation for integer ambiguity resolution", PPP-RTK & open standards Symposium , March 2012, Frankfurt am MainTao Li, Jinling Wang, Denis Laurichesse, “Modelling and quality control for reliable precise point positioning integer ambiguity resolution with GNSS modernization”, GPS Solutions, October 2013Handling the Biases for Improved Triple-Frequency PPP ConvergenceD. Laurichesse, GPS World, April 2015 issue

Raw Beidou MW-Widelane(Double-differences)

The proposed calibration works for the MW-Widelane combination Integer property of phase ambiguity is conservedGeo corrections are tricky to evaluate Constant elevation angles

For the moment, no RTCM message to account for theses biases

Conclusion

GPS network

Continuous estimation with 47 stations and 8 satellites The relatively high noise is consistent with the noise

amplification factor of the combination

User convergence time(JFNG, average over 10 runs)Methodology

Frequency GPS Galileo BeidouA G1 E1 B1B G2 E5a B3C G5 E5b B2

Combination GPS WaveLength(m)

Galileo WaveLength (m)

Beidou WaveLength(m)

MW Extra-widelane (B, C) 5.86 9.76 4.88MW Widelane (A,B) 0.86 0.75 1.02MW Widelane (A,C) 0.75 0.71 0.85

Widelane only1 3.40 3.21 4.52Widelane only iono2 1.98 1.84 2.84

Frequency GPS Galileo BeidouA 3.4 3.2 4.5B -20.7 28.8 -21.2C 17.3 -32 16.7

GPS combinations noise Beidou combinations noise Conclusion The noise of GPS and Beidou measurements is

compatible with ambiguity resolution on all frequencies Widelane-only phase combination is promising for triple-

frequency-AR:

Involves only differences of phase measurements Large wavelengths, fast convergence

No dependency on wind-up effect

kzn2brsthofn kir8

nico

metgreyknya2

dyng tashgmsd

ulab

sgocjfng

ftna tow2nrmgunx2ous2

cut0

sin1

ohi3 cas1krgg

mas1llag

nklg

sutm

seygreunharb

cpvg

ucalstfu unbd

lmmfabmfaut0

aregkoug

scrzchpglpgs

rgdg

thtg

mao0chof

-90

-60

-30

0

30

60

90

-180 -150 -120 -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180

GPS MGEX network (47 stations)

GPS biases

cut0pertkarrsamo

ckis lauttongpngmkiripohn

xmisnium

zim2unb3

ptvl

jfngkzn2

mro1

pen2

-90

-60

-30

0

30

60

90

-180 -150 -120 -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180

Beidou MGEX network (19 stations)

Beidou network Beidou biases

Continuous estimation with 19 stations and 8 satellites (GEO and IGSO)

Discontinuity for 3 MEOs outside Asia region

Partial ambiguity fixing with triple-frequency measurements is already possible over Asia

Widelane-only phase measurements is a good candidate for fast convergence in the triple-frequency context

For Beidou, an elevation-dependent code variation must be taken into account

Satellite biases computation for the widelane-only combination is possible using the current MGEX network, for both GPS and Beidou

At the user-level, quasi-instantaneous ambiguity resolution is achieved, leading to a very fast convergence at the decimeter level

The proposed RTCM message for phase biases is compatible with this approach

Conclusions

Small number of triple-frequency Beidou MGEX stations Upgrade of the CNES/Regina network for triple-frequency

compatibility

Network side: Computation of SSR representation for phase biasesRTCM formatPost-processedUser-side: use of the PPP-Wizard clientReal-time conditions in replay mode

These biases are defined as the phase widelane-only combination of individual phase biases as defined in the RTCM phase bias message

1) Combination of phase widelanes that eliminates the ionosphere component, assuming the extra-widelane is fixed2) Combination of phase widelanes that eliminates the geometry component, assuming the extra-widelane is fixed

Noise amplification factors (widelane-only combination)

Choice of frequencies

Wavelengths of interesting combinations

Epoch (30 s) Epoch (30 s)

Wanninger 2014: Elevation-dependent code variations

Amplitude ~1 meterNature of this bias not fully understood yet

Can be mitigated using predefined corrections

Corrections tables are given for IGSO and MEO

Possible explanationCorrected Beidou MW-Widelane

(Double-differences)

30 sec