immediate jeopardy? now what? successful strategies for protecting your ... jeopardy_bello...
TRANSCRIPT
11/1/2014
1
Immediate Jeopardy? Now What?
Successful Strategies forProtecting Your Facility
Jane Bello Burke, [email protected]
LeadingAge New YorkDirectors of Nursing Services/Directors of Social Work
2014 Annual Conference & Exposition
Accidents: Resident environments must remain as free of accident hazards as possible.
Abuse Investigation and Reporting: Facilities must ensure immediate reporting of all alleged violations
involving mistreatment, neglect or abuse, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property;
thoroughly investigate alleged violation and prevent further potential abuse while the investigation is in progress; and
report the results of all investigations to the Administrator or his designated representative within five working days
2©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Perennial Hot Topics
11/1/2014
2
Quality of Care: Residents must be provided the necessary care and services to enable them to achieve their highest levels of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Care Planning Requirements: Facilities must develop individualized comprehensive care plans to help ensure that each resident receives necessary care and services.
Professional Standards: Facilities must ensure that the services they provide meet professional standards of quality.
3©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
More Perennial Hot Topics
Administration (F490): a facility must be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain each resident’s highest practical physical, mental and psychosocial well being.
Governing Body (F493): the governing body is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies and for appointing the licensed administrator, who is responsible for the management of the facility.
Medical Direction (F501): the medical director is responsible for the implementation of resident care policies and the coordination of medical care in the facility.
Quality Assurance (F520): a facility must have a QAA committee consisting of the DON, a physician and at least three other staff members, meeting at least quarterly to identify issues and develop and implement plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies.
4©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Tag-Along Tags
11/1/2014
3
Remedies/SanctionsCMP -- Civil Money Penalty
Per Day Per Instance
DoPNA -- Denial of Payment for New Medicare and Medicaid Admissions
Loss of NATCEP Approval -- Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program
Termination from Medicare and Medicaid Program
5©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Consequences ofAdverse Survey Determinations
CMP$4,500/day for 17 days = $76,500Reduced to $250/day for an additional 20 days
until substantial compliance = $5,000Total = $81,500
Loss of NATCEP Approval If CMP ≥ $5,000
Other “Contingent” Consequences
6©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Sample: CMS’s “Determination”
11/1/2014
4
7
http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/CertificationandComplianc/Downloads/usersguide.pdf
©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Impact of Deficiencies on Five-Star Ratings
• Other Potential Effects:• Collateral Use in Civil/Criminal Actions
• Attorney General/ Inspector General Investigations
• “Worthless Services” Claims
• Reputational Loss• Special Focus Facility Status
• NH Quality Pool Reimbursement
• Adverse CON Determinations
8
Collateral Consequences
11/1/2014
5
Points assigned based on scope and severity (more for higher-level deficiencies)
More points for substandard quality of care deficiencies If status is “past non-compliance” and severity is IJ (J, K or
L), then the points for “G” level deficiency apply Life safety surveys not included in rating calculations Deficiencies from federal comparative surveys not
reported on NH Compare or included in rating calculations
9
http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/CertificationandComplianc/Downloads/usersguide.pdf
©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Five‐Star Calculation Rules
Correct the Record Hold Surveyors Accountable:
for exaggerating or misstating the facts, or for misapplying the regulations
Reduce a Huge Penalty Mitigate Other Adverse Consequences Challenge the Duration of “Per Diem” CMPs Support Staff (who sometimes simply need
someone to hear their side of the story)
10©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Why Challenge Adverse Survey Determinations?
11/1/2014
6
Independent Dispute ResolutionStandard IDR
Independent IDR
Alternatively or in Addition:Appeal to HHS Departmental Appeals Board
11©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
How to ChallengeAdverse Survey Determinations
12
IDR and Independent IDR
11/1/2014
7
What is IDR?• IDR is an informal process to dispute regulatory
deficiencies• Where to IDR?
• At G level or higher review at Central Office level• Below G level at Regional Office
• How to IDR?• On written submissions• Face-to-face IDR no longer available in New York
13©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Informal Dispute Resolution
What is Independent IDR? The Affordable Care Act provides for: collection and escrow of CMPs prior to the
completion of appeal, and opportunity to request Independent IDR, if CMS
imposes a CMP which is subject to collection and placement in escrow before completion of the appeal
CMS may collect CMP and place it in escrow on earlier of: the date of completion of Independent IDR, or 90 calendar days after the date of the notice of
imposition of the CMP14©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Independent IDR
11/1/2014
8
Why I/IDR? Develop the facts and
test the validity of a possible appeal
Better recall during initial 10-day period
Ability to challenge lower-level deficiencies
No waiver of 35% discount
Why Not I/IDR? Expense
Limited time and resources (during 10-day POC period)
Possible development of additional evidence/ statements
IDR is not binding on CMS
15©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
To IDR or Not to IDR?
16
Standard IDR Independent IDR
Timing 10 days after receipt of DOH SOD
10 days followingreceipt of CMS Letter
Panel NY LNHAs and LTC Ombudsman, with NY surveyor advice
New Jersey surveyors
Format Written submissionsNo face-to-face
Written submissionsNo face-to-face
Facility must select one(cannot pursue both IDR and Independent IDR)
©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Standard vs. Independent IDR
11/1/2014
9
Facility cannot challenge:• Scope or severity, except substandard
quality of care and immediate jeopardy• Choice of remedy• Alleged failure to comply with survey
process• Alleged inconsistency of the survey team• Alleged inadequacies or inaccuracy of the
IDR process
17©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Limitations on I/IDR
Ask:Are the allegations in the SOD accurate and
complete?Did a regulatory violation occur? Is there a causal connection between the alleged
regulatory citation and the harm/potential harm? Decide: If yes, consider opportunities for improvement If no, start writing the challenge
18©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
The Investigation Process
11/1/2014
10
Understand the Regulatory Requirement Refer to the SOM App. PP interpretive guidelines:
https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/som107ap_pp_guidelines_ltcf.pdf
Independently Investigate Each Allegation Interview all witnesses (and have a witness!) Ask: Are these facts accurate?
Did you say this? Review the Resident’s Chart (including portions not cited)
19©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Investigation Tips
Factual Challenge The Facility disputes the allegation that … Explain factual basis and provide evidentiary support
Regulatory Challenge The Facility challenges the conclusion that this condition
violated the regulations, because … The regulations require … According to the SOM, Guidance to Surveyors, … Explain how the facts reflect substantial compliance
Explain Immaterial/Irrelevant Allegations: The allegation that … does not establish a deficient condition, because …
Identify and Provide Relevant Documents
20©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
I/IDR Statement: Outline of Issues
11/1/2014
11
CMS/DOH must show causal connection between alleged regulatory violation and the harm or potential for harm.
The standard is substantial compliance, not perfection.
21©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Keep In Mind:
IJ is where noncompliance “has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death” Severity: Three components of IJ:
Harm – there was no actual or potential serious injury, harm, impairment, or death, because …
Immediacy – there was no immediacy, because … Culpability – there was no capability, because …
Ask: Do the three elements exist?Refer to SOM App. Q Guidelines for IJ:
Scope: Was the condition isolated/pattern/widespread?
22
https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/som107ap_q_immedjeopardy.pdf
©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
I/IDR Statement: Outline of Issues
11/1/2014
12
Accidents: Facility not responsible for unavoidable outcomes that are not reasonably foreseeable
Care Planning Requirements: Facility not responsible for unavoidable outcomes based on resident’s condition
Significant Medication Errors: Facility not responsible unless error causes resident discomfort or jeopardizes health and safety, with determination of significance based on: (i) resident’s condition; (ii) drug category; (iii) frequency of error
Professional Standards: based upon accepted standards of clinical practice as reflected in professional organization, licensing board, or accreditation body publication or other regulatory agency, or in clinical literature.
23©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Remember:
As you peel away the layers, ask:
How did this factor contribute to the problem, or the perceived problem?
Have we fixed it? If so, how? If not, what do we need to do?
What oversight measures should we put in place to make sure this issues stays fixed?
24©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
11/1/2014
13
ADMINISTRATIVEAPPEAL PROCESS
25©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Two Levels
CRD -- Civil Remedies Division (single ALJ)
DAB -- Departmental Appeals Board (panel)
Appeal to Federal Court
26©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
DAB Basics
11/1/2014
14
While the statute appears to allow challenges to any enforcement determination or decision by the HHS Secretary, in practice:
the DAB may review only certain “initial determinations,” including
a finding of noncompliance that results in the imposition of any enforcement remedy
27
Limits on Appeals
©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
A facility has no right to appeal: a determination of noncompliance (a deficiency citation),
but instead, only the remedy imposed as a result of that determination
the State’s recommendation that CMS impose a remedy an adverse IDR or Independent IDR decision
Facilities may appeal only those remedies that persist through the appeal so, if CMS imposes, then withdraws, a remedy (because it
fears it might lose), the ALJ will dismiss the appeal the DAB consistently holds that the withdrawal of the
remedy eliminates the facility’s right to appeal
28©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Limits on Appeals
11/1/2014
15
Per Instance CMPs -- if the only remedy is a “per instance” CMP, the facility may not appeal the “severity” of a citation, because a “per instance” CMP may be imposed
without regard to the level of “severity” Loss of NATCEP
42 C.F.R. § 489.3 provides for review of loss of NATCEP approval, but
the facility needs to be operating such a program at the time of the survey and appeal to base its appeal on this ground
29©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Other Limitations
The 60-Day Rule
“Request for Hearing” is due within 60 days after receipt of the CMS determination letter imposing the federal remedy
A request for I/IDR does not toll or extend the deadline for filing the appeal
30©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
11/1/2014
16
The Request for Hearing must:identify the specific issues, and the findings offact and conclusions of law with which the[facility] disagrees, [and must] specify the basisfor contending that the findings and conclusions are incorrect.
The Request for Hearing must set forth in considerable detail: the precise basis for the facility’s case the facility’s factual disagreement with each cited
deficiency that supports the remedy
31©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Content of the Request for Hearing
Noncompliance is a mixed question of fact and law: Are the agency’s allegations accurate and complete? (What
are the facts?) Does the regulatory provision reach the act or omission?
(What is the law and does it apply?)
CMS bears the initial burden of proceeding: CMS must establish a “prima facie case” of noncompliance, by Offering evidence regarding each element of each disputed
allegation of noncompliance (i.e., by applying the facts to the law and demonstrating a violation)
32©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Burdens of Proceeding and Proof
11/1/2014
17
33
Pros ConsThe Facts are
Incorrect/IncompleteThe Facts are
Substantially Correct
The Surveyors Misconstrued the
Regulations
The Surveyors Correctly Interpreted
the Regulations
There was Little or No Impact on Resident
Condition
There was an Adverse Impact on Resident
Condition
©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Analysis: Mixed Questions of Fact and Law
The Facility was in Substantial Compliance CMS did not make a prima facie showing of any
deficient practice, because … To the extent it did, the preponderance of the
evidence at the hearing will demonstrate that the Facility was in substantial compliance, because …
Alternatively, the assertion of an immediate jeopardy was clearly erroneous, because …
The penalty was excessive (and/or continued in effect for too long), because …
34©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Appeal Statement: Outline of Issues
11/1/2014
18
SOM App. PP (Interpretive Guidelines),App. Q (Guidelines for IJ)
ALJ Opinions http://www.hhs.gov/dab/decisions/civildecisions/index.html
DAB Decisions http://www.hhs.gov/dab/decisions/dabdecisions/index.html
Federal District Court Decisions
35©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
What are the Sources of Law?
Citations with a factual or legal error or excessive scope and severity
Citations that affect the CMP or denial of payment (e.g., immediate jeopardy)
Derivative deficiencies based on the same facts under different tags (e.g., F490, F493, F501, F520)
Start/end date of the deficiency, if it affects CMP Only those deficiencies with a reasonable
likelihood of success
36©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Choosing Your Battles
11/1/2014
19
37©2014 Hodgson Russ LLP
Early Preparation is Key!
Use the initial 10-day period following the receipt of the SOD to prepare: I/IDR request; or alternatively
Immediate CMS appeal
with the direction to be determined on a case-by-case basis
Use the results of the case preparation to bolster QA activities
Jane Bello Burke, Esq.Hodgson Russ, LLP
38
Questions?