implants considerations for beef production

32
Implants – Return on Investment Amy Radunz University of Wisconsin- Madison State Beef Extension Specialist Slides adapted from Bill Halfman, UW Extension Monroe County Dr. Francis Fluharty, The Ohio State

Upload: wisconsin-beef-information-center

Post on 14-May-2015

1.775 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

This powerpoint goes

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Implants – Return on Investment

Amy RadunzUniversity of Wisconsin- MadisonState Beef Extension Specialist

Slides adapted from Bill Halfman, UW Extension Monroe CountyDr. Francis Fluharty, The Ohio State University

Page 2: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

2

• Beef Carcass• Muscle (40 to 65%)• Fat (15 to 45%)• Bone (10 to 15%)

Page 3: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Muscle Cell Growth• Hyperplasia

• Increasing cell number• Muscle cell number fixed during

gestation

• Hypertrophy • increase in muscle cell size• Increased protein synthesis – satellite

cells• Decrease in protein degradation• Combination of both

Page 4: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

4

Implants can increase 1 full unit of frame size

Page 5: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

5

Why do we castrate?• More desirable meat

quality• Marbling• Tenderness• Flavor

• Handling/Facilities• Safety

HOWEVER, we give up growth rate and feed efficiency

Page 6: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Why do we Implant?• Implants enhance performance

• Increase ADG (10-15%)• Increase feed intake (8-10%)• Improve efficiency

Page 7: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

7

Classifying Implants

POTENCY• High potency: Androgen

(Testosterone) based• Testosterone propionate• Trenbolone acetate (TBA)

• Low potency: Estrogen based• Estradiol 17β• Progesterone

• Medium potency: Combination • Androgen/Estrogen implants

DURATION

• 60 – 400 days

READ THE LABEL:Ingredients,

amounts, duration, and class of cattle

Page 8: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

8

Page 9: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Why do buyers discount feeder bull calves?

Steers BullsNo. Head 967 1795Starting wt, lbs 468 46460 d wt, lb 599 58160 d ADG, lb/d 2.23 1.95Morbidity, % 18.7 25.1Mortality, % 0.72 2.28

Dale Blasi, 27 loads of calves received at the KSU Beef Stocker Unit

Page 10: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

AVMA Policy

• Recommend to castrate at earliest age practicable

• Why?• Least stressful time to castrate• Weaning plus vaccination plus other stressor

increase morbidity• Castration at feedlot the most stressful and

results in greatest morbidity and other negative consequences

Page 11: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Economics

• Weight gain from intact calves lost in first 28 –d postweaning (Martson et al., 2003)• Bull gains gain 5-15% more than non-implanted

castrated pre-weaning• First 28-d post-weaning

• 1.52 lbs/d for early-castrated calves• 1.16 lbs/d for calves castrated at weaning• 0.36 lbs/d x 28 = 10 lbs

Page 12: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Age of Castration –Weaning Wt

Early Late0

100

200

300

400

500

Body

Wei

ght,

lbs

36 days of age 131 days of age

Imler, et al., 2010- U of Florida

If Implants used = +18-20 lbs+$27 – 30 per hd

Page 13: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Guidelines for Nursing Calves

• Not approved for calves less than 30-45 d of age• One implant between 2 months and weaning

recommended• Only implant castrated males

• Not recommended for replacement heifers• Do not implant bull calves

• Do not implant if intended for all natural or organic markets

Page 14: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Nursing CalvesTrade Name Approved for Active Ingredient Payout

Period- days

Ralgro® Steers/heifers 36 mg zeranol 70-100Synovex-C®Comonenet E-C®

Steers/heifers 100 mg progesterone10 mg estradiol benzoate

100-140

Compudose® Steers 25.7 mg estradiol 170-200Encore® Steers 43.9 mg estradiol 300-400Note: all of these implants would be classified as low potency implants

Last updated 4-10-2012

Page 15: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Stocker/Backgrounder Guidelines• Can expect 10-15% improvement in ADG (0.18-0.27 lb/d)• Payout between 80-100 days• If feeding longer than 120 days consider long duration

implant or two implants• Factors affecting payout

• Genetic gain potential• Forage availability• Supplementation• Sex• Weight

Page 16: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Approved for grazing, weaned calves not for replacementProduct Approved For: Active Ingredients Payout

Period- daysRalgro® Steers/heifers 36 mg zeranol 70-100

Compudose® Steers/heifers 27.7 mg estradiol 170-200

Encore® Steers/heifers 43.9 mg estradiol 350-400

Revalor-G®Component-TE-G®

Steers/heifers 200 mg estradiol benzoate 100-140

Synovex-S®Component E-S®

Steers 200 mg progesterone20 mg estradiol benzoate

100-140

Synovex-H®Component E-H®

Heifers 200 mg testosterone propionate20 mg estradiol benzoate

100-140

Note: Listed in order of potency and would be consider low to medium-low potency implants

Last updated 4-10-2012

Page 17: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Simmental bulls and steers slaughtered at 1370 lbs

Bulls Steers SEM P-Value

Age, d 420 475

ADG, lbs/d 4.06 3.24 0.16 0.001

Carcass fat gain, g/d 437.5 467.7 22.7 NS

Final carcass fat, % 22.7 32.1 9.0 0.001

Carcass protein gain, g/d 198.7 127.6 6.6 0.001

Final carcass protein, % 16.6 14.7 2.0 0.001

Anderson et al., 1988

Castration impacts on carcass traitsIncreased quality gradeIncreased back fat (higher numeric yield grade)

Page 18: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Implants Impact Carcass Traits• Implants impacts on carcass traits

• Decreased quality grade• Decreased backfat (lower numeric yield grade)• Increased muscle and carcass weight (higher dressing

percentage)• Tougher

• Need to match cattle type, implant, and marketing to get the most return on investment

Page 19: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Start with End in Mind• Questions to ask yourself:

• How many times do I want to implant?• How many days on feed do I expect for this group of

cattle?• How will this strategy influence my marketing?

• Information needed for decision• Frame size of feeder cattle• Muscling of cattle• Breed of cattle• Energy density of diet

Page 20: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Most Return• When Implanted in Growth Curve

• More return at the end of the growth period• Delay fat deposition and increase muscle• Improved feed efficiency when the poorest

• Once Implanted• Most return and response from animal early• Effects will diminish over time = payout period

Page 21: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

21

Zeranol Estradiol TBA + E

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

ADG Choice

Perc

enta

ge c

hang

e

Page 22: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Implant Program

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 200

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Estradiol Estrodial/TBA

CH:SE Spread, $/cwt

$ pr

ofit/

hd

Page 23: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Minimize Impacts on QG

• Lower potency• Delay implanting• Energy density of diet• Timely marketing

Page 24: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Trade Name Approved For: Active Ingredient Payout period- days

Ralgro Magnum® Steers 72 mg zeranol 60-80

Synovex-Choice® Steers 100 mg progesterone 14 mg estradiol benzoate

60-80

Revalor-IH®Component TE- IH®

Heifers 80 mg of trenbolone acetate 8 mg estradiol

60-100

Revalor- IS®Component TE- IS®

Steers 80 mg of trenbolone acetate 16 mg estradiol

60-100

Revalor-S®Component T-S®

Steers 120 mg of trenbolone acetate24 mg of estradiol

80-120

Revalor-H®Component TE-H®

Heifers 140 mg of trenbolone acetate 14 mg estradiol

80-120

Component T-H®Finaplix H®

Heifers 200 mg of trenbolone acetate 80-120

Revalor 200®Component- TE-200®

Steers/Heifers 200 mg of trenbolone acetate 20 mg estradiol

100-140

Synovex-Plus® Steers/heifers 200 mg of trenbolone acetate 28 mg of estradiol benzoate

100-140

Revalor XS® Steers 20 pellets w/ 20 mg of trenbolone acetate & 4 mg estradiol

130-180

Note: These are in addition to implants approved for grazing, weaned calvesAnd listed for in relative order of potency

Last updated 4-10-2012

Page 25: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

25

150 days or less (Yearlings)

Days on Feed

0 14080 100 12020 60

Low E

TBA combo (med to strong): 80-120 d

TBA combo or TBA : 100-120 d

40

TBA combo (med to strong) : 60-80 d

Adapted from Bill Halfman

Page 26: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

26

200 days (Calf-feds)

Days on Feed

0 200100 140 16040 60

Estrogenic or Med. Combo: 60-80 d

TBA combo (med to strong): 100-120 d

Long duration low to medium potency: 200-300 d

TBA combo (med to strong) : 60-80 d

Adapted from Bill Halfman

Page 27: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

27

300 days (Long-fed, Holsteins)

Days on Feed

Low- Estrogenic

Low-Med Estrogenic – long duration

Low Estrogenic

Long duration Implant (200-300 d)

0 300150 200 25050 100

Med- Estrogenic Med- Combo or TBA

Med- Combo or TBA

Long duration Implant (200-300 d)

Adapted from Bill Halfman

Page 28: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Not a fix for poor management

• Implants will not fix• Inadequate nutrition• Lack of bedding• Excessive manure• Poor bunk management

Page 29: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Final Tips

• If using multiple implants increase potency with the following implants• Diminishing returns – animals become

‘adapted’ to implant• Last implant should include some level of TBA

• Greatest improvement in feed efficiency• Longer duration implants may want to consider if

you can restrain 900-1000 lb steers

Page 30: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Implant Placement

Page 31: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

Cost of Improper TechniqueEstimated cost/head

Abscess $25

Bunched/Crushed $15

Missed $25

Walled off/In Cartilage $25

Partial loss $20

Page 32: Implants Considerations for Beef Production

References• Implant strategies for high quality beef production. Robbi Pritchard, SDSU.

www.cabpartners.com/news/research/pritchard_implanting.doc.pdf • Implant Use in Backgrounding Calves. NDSU. www.ag.ndsu.edu

/pubs/ansci/beef/as1178w.htm • Beef Cattle Implants, Utah University Extension.

www.sustainabletable.org/issues/docs/Utah_University_Implants.pdf • Elanco Implant Portfolio: https://www.elanco.us/products-services/beef/ • Intervet, Inc.- Revalor products: http://www.revalor.com/ • Pfizer Animal Health – Synovex products:

https://animalhealth.pfizer.com/sites/PahWeb/US/EN/Pages/Beef.aspx • Merck Animal Health Implants - Ralgro products:http

://www.merck-animal-health-usa.com/products/130_163380/productdetails_130_163790.aspx