implications of prevailing wage zone pay and the contract
TRANSCRIPT
Implications of Prevailing Wage Zone Pay and the Contract Threshold in
Montana
Kevin Duncan, Ph.D.Colorado State University –
Pueblo
Local Government Interim Committee,Montana State Legislature
November 18, 2021
Presentation Topics 1. Costs of prevailing wage laws:
• Impact on construction costs.• September 23 meeting:
• Zone pay and the coverage threshold.
2. Benefits of prevailing wage laws:• Items 1e – 1h, Joint Resolution for Interim Committee:• Economic impact (threshold).• Apprenticeship training and injury rates.• Construction worker earnings.
Labor Costs in Construction• U. S. Census Bureau construction survey:
• Every 5 years, several 100,000 contractors.
• Commercial, heavy & highway and new, demo, etc.
• Blue-collar construction worker wages and benefits:
• 23% of total contractor costs of construction in U.S.
• 24% in Montana.
• September’s meeting: A “cement culvert system” in Baker• North Dakota cost = $500,000 (no prevailing wage).• Montana cost = $800,000 (with prevailing wage).• A 60% cost increase with 24% labor costs?
Prevailing Wages, Construction Costs, and Peer-Reviewed Research
• Statistical analysis of contractor bid costs. • Compare projects with and without prevailing wages.• Considering project complexity and size, etc.• An apples to apples comparison.
• 92% of school construction studies: No PW cost impact.
• 75% of highway studies: No PW cost impact.
• Why?• Labor costs are a low percent of total costs.• Small labor productivity and utilization changes offset
prevailing wages.
Changes to the Coverage Threshold and Construction Costs.
• Nevada school construction (2009-2018):• Examine the cost effect of prevailing wage by:• Comparing projects above and below the coverage threshold.• Before 2015, threshold = $100,000, after 2015 = $250,000.
• Costs of projects above and below the thresholds?• Due to differences in size and complexity.• No cost difference due to prevailing wages.
Prevailing Wage Changes and Construction Costs.
• Nevada school construction:• 10% PW reduction for school construction in 2015.• Different effects on union and nonunion contractors.
• Union contractors pursued other projects.• 25% reduction in bid competition after 2015.• 20% increase in low bids after 2015.
• Policy changes in 2015:•Threshold was increased to reduce construction costs.•10% reduction in PW to reduce costs.
Prevailing Wage Changes and Construction Costs.
• Colorado highway resurfacing (2000-2011):• Compares federal and state-funded work.
• No cost difference between federal and state projects.
• 2002 federal prevailing wage determination: • Prevailing wages change from union to average rates.• Compensation for 83% of job classifications fell 18%.
• No cost difference between federal and state projects.
Benefits of Prevailing Wages:Economic Impact.
• By protecting local wages, PW protects work for local contractors.
• More of the jobs, income, and spending remain in the region.
• Stimulates local retail and services industries.
• A benefit to industries that are unrelated to construction.
• Research examples:
• School construction in Minneapolis-St. Paul
• With PW, 10% more of project value by local contractors.
• 74% with PW v. 64% without PW.
Economic Impact of Prevailing Wages.
• Library construction in Santa Clara County, CA.
• With PW, 39% of contractors were county residents.
• Without PW, 23% of contractors were county residents.
• Iowa highway construction with Davis-Bacon PW
• Out of state contractors 8% less like to win a bid.
Economic Impact of an Increased Coverage Threshold
• Between 2007 and 2012:
• Increase in work by out-of-state contractors across the nation.
• Three states raised their coverage thresholds:
• Indiana by $100,000, Oregon by $25,000:
• Both had above average increases in work by out-of-state
builders.
• Ohio by $10,405, no above average increase in work by out-of-
state contractors.
Prevailing Wages, Apprenticeship Training, and Income.
• Prevailing wages create an incentive to hire apprentices:
• Apprentices earn a fraction of the prevailing wage.
• About 25% of construction in Montana is publicly funded.
• Prevailing wage is a driver of formal training in Montana.
• 79% of apprentices in Montana are in construction.
• Apprentice career earnings $240,000 higher.** Mathematica Policy Research. 2012. “An Effectiveness Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Registered Apprentices in 10 States.” Accessed at: https://www.mathematica.org/publications/an-effectiveness-assessment-and-costbenefit-analysis-of-registered-apprenticeship-in-10-states
Prevailing Wages, Apprenticeships, Training, and Injury Rates.
• Other research:
• Apprentice enrollments are 6% to 8% higher in states with
prevailing wages.
• Injury rates are 7% to 10% lower in states with prevailing wages.
Prevailing Wages, Payroll Taxes, and Construction Worker Poverty
• 10 states repealed PW from 1979 and 1995:
• Average income of ALL construction workers decreased by 4%.
• Legally required benefit payments decreased by 10%.
• Includes SS#, workers comp, unemployment ins.
• Voluntary benefits, paid by the employer, decreased by 16%.
• Includes retirement and health insurance benefits.
• If wages decrease, dependence on public assistance increases.** Manzo and Duncan. 2018. “An Examination of Minnesota’s Prevailing Wage Law.” Accessed at: https://midwestepi.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/mepi-csu-examination-of-minnesotas-prevailing-wage-law-final.pdf
Research Implications:• Eliminating zone pay and increasing the threshold:
• Unlikely to reduce construction costs.• May have unintended consequences (bid competition &
costs).
• A loss of benefits:• Less work for local contractors.• Fewer apprentices.• More injuries.• Reduced construction worker incomes.
• Increased poverty and dependence on public assistance.