improved spatial normalization using pet templates of b. f ... · this document was prepared by...

3
Rev Jan 31 2011 1 Improved spatial normalization using PET templates of [ 18 F]florbetapir brain uptake of control and AD subjects Nicholas Seneca, Cyrill Burger and Ioana Florea PMOD Technologies, LLC., Zurich, Switzerland Contents Pages 1-2 Summary, Methods, Dataset Information, References Page 3 Workflow for the creation of a disease specific reference [ 18 F]Florbetapir template Summary Positron emission tomography (PET) radioligands selective for -amyloid have high uptake in white matter, especially in controls which tend to have lower cortical uptake compared to patients with Alzheimer’s disease. During a PET only image analysis workflow, a PET scan is spatially normalized to a template image such as a [ 15 O]H2O scan. The uptake pattern of the - amyloid PET radioligands in the white matter increases the likelihood of a normalization failure. For example, white-matter uptake is three times lower compared to gray matter for a [ 15 O]H2O scan [1], whereas, [ 18 F]Florbetapir uptake in normal controls is ~1.6 times higher in white matter compared to gray matter. During a PET-MRI image analysis workflow, the MRI-based normalization may fail [2]. Additionally, not all studies include an MRI in the schedule of assessments. Therefore, a tracer specific template is preferable for the spatial normalization process [3, 4]. Methods ADNI [ 18 F]Florbetapir PET data were used to create disease specific brain templates for a control group (n = 136, 73 females and 63 males, mean age 72 5.0) and for an Alzheimer’s disease patients group (n = 121, 51 females and 70 males, mean age 73 7.0). The mini-mental status examination in the AD patients and controls scored 23.2 2.0 and 29.1 1.1 respectively. The pre-processed (i.e., co-reg, avg, standardized image and voxel size) [ 18 F]Florbetapir PET and the corresponding MRI baseline scans were downloaded from the ADNI- GO/-2 databases as available on and after September 30 th 2016. [ 18 F]Florbetapir Brain Template Creation The templates construction was based on a workflow previously described for rodent brain images of various PET and SPECT radioligands [4]. The procedure was performed using the image fusion module (PFUSEIT) in the PMOD 3.8 software (PMOD Technologies LLC., Zurich, Switzerland). Figure 1. PET templates of [ 18 F]Florbetapir brain uptake in control and Alzheimer’s disease subjects from ADNI imaging datasets. (A) Gray matter segmented MRI template. (B) High non-specific uptake in white matter from control subjects (n = 136). (C) Increased uptake in cortical brain regions as well as high uptake in white matter from Alzheimer’s disease patients (n = 121). Images B and C are the final disease specific templates in MNI space shown in axial, sagittal and coronal planes. 2.5 0 A. B. C.

Upload: others

Post on 25-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Improved spatial normalization using PET templates of B. F ... · This document was prepared by Drs. Nicholas Seneca, Cyrill Burger and Ioana Florea from PMOD Technologies, LLC.,

Rev Jan 31 2011

1

Improved spatial normalization using PET templates of

[18F]florbetapir brain uptake of control and AD subjects Nicholas Seneca, Cyrill Burger and Ioana Florea

PMOD Technologies, LLC., Zurich, Switzerland

Contents Pages 1-2 Summary, Methods, Dataset Information, References

Page 3 Workflow for the creation of a disease specific reference [18F]Florbetapir template

Summary

Positron emission tomography (PET) radioligands selective for -amyloid have high uptake

in white matter, especially in controls which tend to have lower cortical uptake compared to

patients with Alzheimer’s disease. During a PET only image analysis workflow, a PET scan is

spatially normalized to a template image such as a [15O]H2O scan. The uptake pattern of the -

amyloid PET radioligands in the white matter increases the likelihood of a normalization failure.

For example, white-matter uptake is three times lower compared to gray matter for a [15O]H2O

scan [1], whereas, [18F]Florbetapir uptake in normal controls is ~1.6 times higher in white matter

compared to gray matter. During a PET-MRI image analysis workflow, the MRI-based

normalization may fail [2]. Additionally, not all studies include an MRI in the schedule of

assessments. Therefore, a tracer specific template is preferable for the spatial normalization

process [3, 4].

Methods

ADNI [18F]Florbetapir PET data were used to create

disease specific brain templates for a control group

(n = 136, 73 females and 63 males, mean age 72

5.0) and for an Alzheimer’s disease patients group

(n = 121, 51 females and 70 males, mean age 73

7.0). The mini-mental status examination in the AD

patients and controls scored 23.2 2.0 and 29.1

1.1 respectively. The pre-processed (i.e., co-reg,

avg, standardized image and voxel size)

[18F]Florbetapir PET and the corresponding MRI

baseline scans were downloaded from the ADNI-

GO/-2 databases as available on and after September

30th 2016.

[18F]Florbetapir Brain Template Creation

The templates construction was based on a workflow

previously described for rodent brain images of

various PET and SPECT radioligands [4]. The

procedure was performed using the image fusion

module (PFUSEIT) in the PMOD 3.8 software

(PMOD Technologies LLC., Zurich, Switzerland).

Figure 1. PET templates of [18F]Florbetapir brain uptake in

control and Alzheimer’s disease subjects from ADNI imaging datasets. (A) Gray matter segmented MRI template. (B) High

non-specific uptake in white matter from control subjects (n =

136). (C) Increased uptake in cortical brain regions as well as high uptake in white matter from Alzheimer’s disease patients

(n = 121). Images B and C are the final disease specific

templates in MNI space shown in axial, sagittal and coronal planes.

2.5

0

A.

B.

C.

Page 2: Improved spatial normalization using PET templates of B. F ... · This document was prepared by Drs. Nicholas Seneca, Cyrill Burger and Ioana Florea from PMOD Technologies, LLC.,

Rev Jan 31 2011

2

Briefly, the template creation can be described in five main steps. First, a representative PET image

was selected as “standard image” from the dataset. Each of the individual PET images was

normalized to the standard image using the batch facility in the PFUSEIT module. Secondly, the

normalized scans were averaged to obtain a first average PET (LR) in the space of the selected

standard image, which might suffer from some asymmetry. Third, to compensate for asymmetry,

the LR average was mirrored and normalized to LR, resulting an RL average. The LR and RL

images were averaged to obtain the presumably symmetrical average PET image (LR_RL). Fourth,

the LR_RL average was rigidly matched (RM) to the MRI image corresponding to the selected

standard PET image. Fifth, the representative MRI image was normalized to the MNI MRI

template using the three-tissue probability maps normalization (3TPM). Finally, the RM and the

3TPM transformations were combined and the symmetrical LR_RL average was transformed to

the MNI space (Figure 1).

A schematic representation of the image analysis workflow is shown in Figure 2.

Dataset Information This methods document applies to the following dataset(s) available from the ADNI repository:

Dataset Name Date Submitted

ADNI database September 30th, 2016

References

1. Zhang, K., et al. (2014). "Comparison of cerebral blood flow acquired by simultaneous

[15O]water positron emission tomography and arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance

imaging." J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 34(8): 1373-1380.

2. Brendel, M., et al. (2015). "Improved longitudinal [18F]AV45 amyloid PET by white

matter reference and VOI-based partial volume effect correction." Neuroimage 108: 450-

459.

3. Perani, D., et al. (2014). "Validation of an optimized SPM procedure for FDG-PET in

dementia diagnosis in a clinical setting." Neuroimage Clin 6: 445-454.

4. Vallez Garcia, D., et al. (2015). "A standardized method for the construction of tracer

specific PET and SPECT rat brain templates: validation and implementation of a

toolbox." PLoS One 10(3): e0122363.

About the Authors

This document was prepared by Drs. Nicholas Seneca, Cyrill Burger and Ioana Florea from

PMOD Technologies, LLC., Zurich, Switzerland. For more information please contact PMOD at

+41 443504600 or by email at [email protected].

Notice: This document is presented by the author(s) as a service to ADNI data users. However, users should be

aware that no formal review process has vetted this document and that ADNI cannot guarantee the accuracy or

utility of this document.

Page 3: Improved spatial normalization using PET templates of B. F ... · This document was prepared by Drs. Nicholas Seneca, Cyrill Burger and Ioana Florea from PMOD Technologies, LLC.,

Rev Jan 31 2011

3

Figure 2. A schematic representation of the image analysis workflow for the creation of a

disease specific reference [18F]Florbetapir template.

*Adapte

d

from

Vállez

Garc

ia e

t al.,

2015

4

R

L

Re

pre

se

nta

tiv

e im

ag

e

se

lec

ted

as

th

e

“s

tan

da

rd im

ag

e”

Ind

ivid

ua

l s

ca

ns

are

n

orm

alize

d t

o

rep

res

en

tati

ve

ima

ge

Cre

ati

on

of

a v

ox

el-

wis

e a

ve

rag

e

tem

pla

te b

y m

irro

rin

g l

eft

rig

ht

du

plic

ate

Av

era

ge

no

rma

lize

d s

cans

Rig

id m

atc

hin

g b

etw

ee

n v

ox

el-

wis

e a

ve

rag

e a

nd

MR

I o

f re

pre

se

nta

tiv

e im

ag

e

LR

3 t

pm

no

rma

liza

tio

n o

f th

e

MR

I re

pre

se

nta

tiv

e im

ag

e t

o

the

MR

I (M

NI)

te

mp

late

Fin

al

tem

pla

te in

M

NI s

pa

ce

LR

im

ag

e (

a)

LR

_R

L im

ag

e

Mir

rore

d L

R im

ag

e (

b)

is

no

rma

lize

d t

o L

R im

ag

e

(a)

res

ult

s in

(c

)

R

Av

era

ge

RL

(c

) a

nd

LR

im

ag

e (

a)

RL

RL

LRL

1

2

3

4