in this issue - geo.org.za · the onus of proof in disciplinary hearings falls on the initiator’s...
TRANSCRIPT
Havingtroublereadingthisemail? Viewitinyourbrowser
Newsletter-GEOGuardianEmployersOrganisation
TIPSFORINITIATORSATDISCIPLINARYHEARINGS(Enquiries)
GEOofficialschairovertwohundreddisciplinaryhearingspermonth.Chairpersonsarerequiredtoactimpartiallyandcannotassisttheinitiatororemployeeinpresentingtheirrespectivecases.
Theonusofproofindisciplinaryhearingsfallsontheinitiator’s(employer’s)shoulders.
Assuch,theinitiatorisrequiredtopresentaconvincingcasetothechairperson.Thestandardofproofindisciplinaryhearingsis“onabalanceofprobabilities”.Althoughthisisalesserstandardthanexpectedincriminalcases(“beyondareasonabledoubt)”,theinitiatorisstillrequiredtopresentastrongenoughcaseforthechairpersontofindanemployeeguiltyoftheallegationsagainsthim.Initiatorsarethereforerequiredtopresentasubstantiallyconvincingcase,withsufficientevidenceforthechairpersontobeconvincedthatitisverylikelythattheemployeeisguiltyoftheallegation(s).Asthechairpersonhastoremainnon-partisan.Itsometimeshappensthatachairpersonmustfindanerrantemployeenotguiltybecausetheinitiatorhasfailedtopresentasubstantiallyconvincingcase.
THEFOLLOWINGTIPSWILLASSIST
Investigateincidentsofmisconductthoroughly
Establishwhere,whenandhowtheincidenttookplace.Interviewtheemployeeandgetastatement.Establishwhatevidenceisavailable(trackingrecords,invoices,receipts,policies,procedures,physicalevidence,andvideoandsoundrecordings,etc.).Securetheevidence.Establishiftherearewitnessesandobtainwrittenstatementsfromthem.Remember,thewitnessesmusttestifyatthehearing.Itisnotsufficienttosimplypresenttheirstatements.Checktheemployee’sdisciplinaryrecord.Askwhethertheemployeehascommittedanoffencethatshouldgotoahearingordoestheoffencemerelyrequiretheissuingofafurther,moreseriouswarning.
Prepareproperlybeforethehearing
Draftproperallegationsthatcontainafulldescriptionoftheallegation(s)andthedateandtimethattheoffence(s)occurred.EnsurethattheChairperson,dateandtimeofthedisciplinaryhearinghasbeentimeouslyarranged.ServetheNoticeoftheDisciplinaryHearingontheemployeeandensurethatsufficientnoticeofthehearingisgiven(usuallynotfewerthan48hours).Preparequestionsforyourwitnesses.Meetwithyourwitnessesandpreparethemforthehearing.Preparequestionsfortheaccusedemployeeandanypossiblewitnessesthathe/shemaycall.Prepareabundleofdocumentswiththedocumentaryevidencethatyouintendtolead.Paginatethebundleofdocumentsandmakeextracopiesforthechairmanandtheemployee.Preparethefactsthatyouintendtopresentinaggravation(previouswarnings,astatementonwhytheemploymentortrustrelationshiphasbeendestroyed,damagecaused,losstotheemployer,etc).Ensurethatyourbundleofdocumentscontainsinteralia:
-Theemployee’scontractofemployment.-Thecompanyrules.Relevantpoliciesandprocedures.-Evidenceofthemisconduct(trackingreports,clockingreport,invoices,etc.).-Copiesofpreviouswarnings.-Witnessesandemployee’sstatements.
Atthedisciplinaryhearing
Donotbetooconcernedabouttheprocedurethatwillbefollowedduringthehearing.TheChairmanwillguidetheprocessandgiveyouampletimetopresentyourcase.Ensurethatyouhaveyourbundleofdocuments(andcopies),evidence(videofootage,documents,etc)andwitnessesavailable.Presentyourevidenceinachronologicalorder.Inotherwords,presenttheevidenceandcallyourwitnessestotestifyinalogicalsequence.Thiswillhelpthechairpersonunderstandyourcaseandinallprobabilityfindthatyouhaveprovedonabalanceofprobabilitiesthattheemployeeisindeedguiltyoftheallegation(s)againsthim/her.
Followthesetipsandyoushouldpresentaconvincingcaseatyournextdisciplinaryhearing.
RegardsAndreRabeGEOChairman
0861436436
AlthoughthePOPIActwassignedintolawafewyearsago,ithastakensometimefortheInformationRegulatortobeappointedandforthePOPIregulationstobepublished.ThesewerepublishedintheGovernmentGazetteon14thDecember201842110,RG10897,GN1383.
Section114(1)oftheActstatesthat:
"AllprocessingofpersonalinformationmustwithinoneyearafterthecommencementofthissectionbemadetoconformtothisAct".
Essentially,thismeansthatallbusinessesmustbecompliantbytheendof2019.Responsiblepersons*thatfailtocomplywiththePOPIActstandtobefineduptoR10000000orface10yearsinprison.
A“responsibleperson”meansapublicorprivatebodyoranyotherpersonwhich,aloneorinconjunctionwithothers,determinesthepurposeofandmeansforprocessingpersonalinformation.UltimatelythepersonheldresponsiblewillbetheManagingDirectororCEOoftheerrantcompany.
TheGEOhasspentthebetterof2018designingaPOPIimplementationprocessandisreadytoprovidethistomembersthatarenotPOPIcompliant.
18-11-2019
Contactus:Email:[email protected]:0861436436
InThisIssue
An“Initiator”presentsthe
employer’scaseatadisciplinaryhearingandisrequiredtopresentastrong
enoughcaseforthechairpersontofindanemployeeguiltyoftheallegationsagainsthim.
Unfortunately,notallinitiatorsareproperly
preparedwhenpresentingthe
company’scase.AndreRabe,CEO,offerssometipsthat
willassistinitiatorstopresenta
substantiallyconvincingcaseat
DisciplinaryHearings
___________________GEOmembersareadvisedtosubscribetotheCIRISinternetlabourlawadvicesite.Itprovidesvaluableinformationonallmatters
relatedtoLabourLaw.ContactAndreRabeon
___________________Visitoursite:www.geo.org.za
CIRISwebsite:www.cirisonline.net
E-LEARNING–INITIATINGDISCIPLINARYHEARINGS
WehavedesignedanE-Learningcoursecoveringhowtoinitiateprofessionaldisciplinaryhearings.Theonlinecourseisdesignedforanymanagerorsupervisorthatmayberequiredtoactasaninitiatorindisciplinaryhearings.
Thebenefitsofthisonlinecourseare:
-Costeffectivenovenue,foodortravellingcosts;
-Learnerpaceddelegatesworkthroughthematerialattheirownspeed;
-Noworkdisruptiondelegatesatwork;
-Convenientdelegatescanpauseorcontinuethecourseatanystage;
-Multipledevicesthecoursecanbepausedandcontinuedonotherdevicese.g.homePCorsmartphone;
-Contentcanbedownloaded;
-Contentcanbecustomised;
-Learnerprogressismonitoredandreportsprovided.
Toseeademoofthecourseselectthefollowinglink:
E-CourseInitiatingDisciplinaryHearings-PowerPoint
ToaccessthecoursecontactAndreRabeon0824910708oremail:[email protected]