individual differences in attention during category learning michael d. lee uc irvine ruud wetzels...

13
Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning Michael D. Lee UC Irvine Ruud Wetzels University of Amsterdam

Post on 21-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning Michael D. Lee UC Irvine Ruud Wetzels University of Amsterdam

Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning

Michael D. LeeUC Irvine

Ruud WetzelsUniversity of Amsterdam

Page 2: Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning Michael D. Lee UC Irvine Ruud Wetzels University of Amsterdam

Kruschke (1993) Condensation Experiment

8 stimuli varying in their box height and interior line position

Divided into 2 categories, so that both dimensions are relevant

40 participants did 40 blocks of trials with corrective feedback

Page 3: Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning Michael D. Lee UC Irvine Ruud Wetzels University of Amsterdam

Generalized Context Model

Page 4: Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning Michael D. Lee UC Irvine Ruud Wetzels University of Amsterdam

Results of Standard GCM Analysis

Marginal posterior over the attention parameter indicates both dimensions are important Familiar story, and a strong temptation to stop

there …

Page 5: Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning Michael D. Lee UC Irvine Ruud Wetzels University of Amsterdam

Posterior Predictive

“Violin plots” of posterior predictive for each stimuli, together with aggregated data (black line) and individual data (broken lines)

Page 6: Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning Michael D. Lee UC Irvine Ruud Wetzels University of Amsterdam

Types of Individual Differences

Page 7: Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning Michael D. Lee UC Irvine Ruud Wetzels University of Amsterdam

Allowing for Individual Differences

Continuous individual differences are modeled by drawing subject parameters from an over-arching hierarchical distribution

Discrete individual differences are modeled as a latent mixture, so different subjects can be drawn from different group distributions

Let WinBUGS do the heavy lifting, check chains for convergence, etc, …

Page 8: Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning Michael D. Lee UC Irvine Ruud Wetzels University of Amsterdam

Results of Individual Differences Analysis

Suggests there are two groups, with different attention

Page 9: Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning Michael D. Lee UC Irvine Ruud Wetzels University of Amsterdam

Bayes Factor

Savage-Dickey method gives approximate Bayes Factor of 2.3 in favor there being two groups (rather than one)

“artist’s impression”

Page 10: Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning Michael D. Lee UC Irvine Ruud Wetzels University of Amsterdam

Posterior Predictive Distribution

Posterior predictive distributions of categorization behavior are qualitatively different tracks people’s behavior at both the sub-group

and individual level

Page 11: Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning Michael D. Lee UC Irvine Ruud Wetzels University of Amsterdam

Interpretation of Groups

The two groups are shown in the panels The bars show the number of “A” vs “B”

category decisions made for each stimulus

Page 12: Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning Michael D. Lee UC Irvine Ruud Wetzels University of Amsterdam

Interpretation of Groups

The group on the left pays attention to position, and so makes mistakes with stimuli 4 and 5

Page 13: Individual Differences in Attention During Category Learning Michael D. Lee UC Irvine Ruud Wetzels University of Amsterdam

Interpretation of Groups

The group on the left pays attention to position, and so makes mistakes with stimuli 4 and 5

The group on the right pays attention to height, and so makes mistakes with stimuli 2 and 7