industrial nuclear company, inc. ten hole source changer
TRANSCRIPT
Industrial Nuclear Company, Inc. Ten Hole Source Changer
Model THSCDocket No. 71-9360
A Presentation to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
June 19, 2018
> NRC #2, June 19, 20182
Agenda
Introduction
Description of THSC Package
Materials of Construction
THSC Payload Descriptions
Certification Test Results
Verification of Shield Integrity
Submittal Schedule
Summary
> NRC #2, June 19, 20183
Description of THSC Package
Enclosed, Right Circular Cylinder12-3/4” OD x 14-1/2” High
Welded Stainless Steel Construction
Depleted Uranium Gamma Shield
Titanium Source Tubes/Hub
Gross Weight: Approximately 330 lb
> NRC #2, June 19, 20184
Description of THSC Package (con’t)
> NRC #2, June 19, 20185
Description of THSC Package (con’t)
Shown without bottom support channels
TOP DU SUPPORT PIPE
LOCK BOX ASSEMBLY
COPPER SHIM, TYP
SIDE DU SUPPORT CHANNEL
PLASTIC BURN-OUT PLUGS(3 PLACES)
38" CLOSURE LID BOLTS
(8 PLACES)
UPPER DUSUPPORT RING
38" THK MOUNTING PLATE
SOURCE TUBE ASSEMBLY(TITANIUM)
DEPLETED URANIUM (DU) SHIELD
DU LOWERSUPPORT RING
POLYURETHANE FOAM
> NRC #2, June 19, 20186
Materials of Construction
Structural:Type 304 stainless steel plate, bar, and pipe
ASTM A320 L7 or L43 Closure Lid & Lock Box Bolts
All welded construction encasing gamma shield
Copper shims between DU and stainless steel contact points
Polyurethane foam for insulation & impact mitigation
0.50” OD x 0.056” wall titanium source tubes
Titanium hub
Gamma ShieldingCast depleted uranium (DU)
All materials have previously been used in currently NRC licensed source changers and radiation cameras
> NRC #2, June 19, 20187
THSC Payload Description
ContentsIridium 192 (Ir–192) capsules
Selenium 75 (Se–75) capsules
Licensed as Special Form
Contents limits1,500 Ci total limit
Maximum 150 Ci per capsule
Maximum of 10 capsules per package
> NRC #2, June 19, 20188
Regulatory Compliance Plan
Structural evaluations:
NCT compression and free drop, HAC free & puncture drops, by test
All other NCT and HAC load cases by analysis
Thermal evaluation by comparison to IR-100 thermal test:
Thermal test not necessary since DU shield not exposed following all free and puncture drop tests
IR–100 thermal test demonstrated no shielding degradation occurs provided DU shield remains protected by stainless steel body
Shielding evaluationNCT and HAC dose rates by test
> NRC #2, June 19, 20189
Certification Test Results
Test ObjectivesDemonstrate resistance to compressive force per
§71.71(c)(9)
Demonstrate no degradation in shielding capability of package occurs after a worst–case sequence of free and puncture drops
Demonstrate retention of special form capsules within the gamma shield
Free/Puncture drop tests performed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, March 27-28, 2018
> NRC #2, June 19, 201810
Certification Test Results (con’t)Compression Test
Test per 10 CFR §71.71(c)(9), greater of:5 times weight of package (=1,650 lb) or
Equivalent of 13 kPa (2 lb/in2) multiplied by vertical projected area of package (=255 lb)
Applied force: 1,652 lb
Result: No deformation of package after 24 hrs
> NRC #2, June 19, 201811
Certification Test Results (con’t)Compression Test
> NRC #2, June 19, 201812
Certification Test Results (con’t)Free and Puncture Drops
Two full–scale, prototypic CTUs
Demonstration basis: radiation dose rates comply with §71.51(a)(2) radiation limits after series of free and puncture dropsUse of actual radioactive source capsules
Post–test readings versus pre–test readings
Tests Performed per 10 CFR §71.73Five Free Drops
Two Puncture Drops
> NRC #2, June 19, 201813
Certification Test Results (con’t)Free and Puncture Drops
Test ConditionsFor high-impact drops, DU temperature cold (~ -20 °F)
Bottom down orientation, NCT & HAC
For maximum crush deformation and/or high-impact drops, temperature was at NCT hot condition (~140 °F)
Top down, CG–over–corner
Top down
Side
All puncture drop tests were performed with CTUs at post-free drop test temperature condition
> NRC #2, June 19, 201814
Certification Test Results (con’t)Free and Puncture Drops
One NCT, 4–ft free bottom down drop, Cold (CTU-1)
Four HAC 30–ft free dropsBottom down, Cold (CTU-1)
Top down, CG-over-corner , Hot (CTU-1)
Top down, Hot (CTU-2)
Side, Hot (CTU-2)
Two puncture dropsTop down, CG-over-corner (CTU-1)
Side (CTU-2)
> NRC #2, June 19, 201815
Certification Test Results (con’t)Free and Puncture Drops
Data collectedSurface temperature of DU shield
Photographs
Normal & high speed video
MeasurementsCrush distance, puncture damage (if any)
Radiation Dose Rates Pre- and post-test
No reduction in shielding capability recorded
> NRC #2, June 19, 201816
Certification Test Results (con’t)CTU-1
NCT 4-ft Bottom Down Drop, DU Surface -19 °F
> NRC #2, June 19, 201817
Certification Test Results (con’t)CTU-1
HAC 30-ft Bottom Down Drop, DU Surface < -7 °F
> NRC #2, June 19, 201818
Certification Test Results (con’t)CTU-1
HAC 30-ft CG-Over-Top Corner Drop, CTU Temp 156 °F
> NRC #2, June 19, 201819
Certification Test Results (con’t)CTU-1
HAC 40-inch Puncture on CG-Over-Top Corner Damage, CTU Temp 70 °F
> NRC #2, June 19, 201820
Certification Test Results (con’t)CTU-2
HAC 30-ft Top Down Drop, DU Surface 153 °F
> NRC #2, June 19, 201821
Certification Test Results (con’t)CTU-2
HAC 30-ft Side Drop, DU Surface >120 °F
> NRC #2, June 19, 201822
Certification Test Results (con’t)CTU-2
HAC 40-inch Puncture on Side Damage, CTU Temp 85 °F
> NRC #2, June 19, 201823
Certification Test Results (con’t)CTU-1 Post-Test Results
Inspection of the mounting plate/lock boxes experienced no damage from NCT or HAC drop tests
Brass dust caps dislodged (not lock wired for test)
> NRC #2, June 19, 201824
Certification Test Results (con’t)CTU-2 Post-Test Results
Inspection of the mounting plate/lock boxes revealed mounting plate was bowed inward from HAC side drop impact:0.380 inch at Tube 6 (adjacent to side impact)
0.233 inch at Tube 10 (180° from side impact)
Deformed mounting plate slightly moved lock box/source pigtail from the designed stored position in DU shield
Brass dust caps dislodged (not locked wired in test)
> NRC #2, June 19, 201825
Certification Test Results (con’t)CTU-2 Post-Test Results (con’t)
> NRC #2, June 19, 201826
Certification Test Results (con’t)CTU-2 Post-Test Results (con’t)
View of Tube 6 (left) and Tube 10 (right) illustrating post-test mounting plate deformation
> NRC #2, June 19, 201827
Certification Test Results (con’t)Details of DU Shield
DU shields procured from Aerojet Ordnance TNCTU-1 Shield (2012):
Shield Weight: 235 lb
One source tube damaged during casting, only (9) source tubes useable
Gross package weight: 328 lb
CTU-2 Shield (2014): Weight: 225 lb
During casting, upper mold broke, which resulted in a 2-step casting process
All (10) source tubes useable
Gross package weight: 319 lb
> NRC #2, June 19, 201828
Certification Test Results (con’t)Radiation Surveys
Both pre-test and post-test surveys were performed using actual Ir-192 special form capsules:
Pre-Test: 110 Ci/capsule (total of 1,110 Ci max)
Post-Test: 105 Ci/capsule (total of 1,050 Ci max)
During CTU-2 post-test survey, it was discovered that a trap plate was inadvertently installed in lock boxes on CTUs
Plate utilized for the IR-50 Source Changer
Prevented source capsules from being positioned in designed stored position near/against titanium hub
Effect was to increase measured surface dose rates
> NRC #2, June 19, 201829
Certification Test Results (con’t)Radiation Surveys (con’t)
CTU-1 measured dose ratesTrap plate installed for both pre-test & post-test surveys
> NRC #2, June 19, 201830
Certification Test Results (con’t)Radiation Surveys (con’t)
CTU-2 measured dose ratesTrap plate installed for both pre-test & post-test surveys
> NRC #2, June 19, 201831
Certification Test Results (con’t)Radiation Surveys (con’t)
CTU-2 measured dose ratesMaximum surface dose rate comparison with & without trap
plate installed
> NRC #2, June 19, 201832
Certification Test Results (con’t)Summary
Regulatory ComplianceMinimal damage to package from free and puncture
drops IAW 10 CFR §71.71 and §71.73
No dislodgement of source capsules
Pre-test and post-test radiation dose rates comply with 10 CFR §71.47(a) [NCT] and §71.51(a)(2) [HAC], respectively
> NRC #2, June 19, 201833
Verification of Shield Integrity
Based on certification testing of two separate DU shields, acceptance tests in application for shield integrity will include:Ultrasonic examination at supplier’s facility
Shielding test upon receipt at INC facility
Dimensional inspection
DU shields not passing all acceptance tests will not be utilized in a THSC package
> NRC #2, June 19, 201834
Submittal Schedule
Certification testing – CompletedCompression Test - September 2017
Free and Puncture Drops - March 2018
Radiation Survey Tests – March (Pre-) & May (Post-) 2018
Anticipate submittal of application to NRC for Type B(U)–96 certification – 4th Quarter 2018
Planning on approximately 5 months to first round RAIs
> NRC #2, June 19, 201835
IR–THSC Package
Summary