industry’s perspective of design for safety regulations john gambatese, oregon state university,...

12
Industry’s Perspective of Industry’s Perspective of Design for Safety Regulations Design for Safety Regulations John Gambatese, John Gambatese, Oregon State Oregon State University, USA University, USA Alistair Gibb, Alistair Gibb, Loughborough Loughborough University, UK University, UK Phil Bust, Phil Bust, Loughborough University, UK Loughborough University, UK Michael Behm, Michael Behm, East Carolina East Carolina University, USA University, USA CIB W099 Conference CIB W099 Conference Working Together: Planning, Designing Working Together: Planning, Designing and Building a Healthy and Safety and Building a Healthy and Safety Construction Industry Construction Industry Melbourne, Australia Melbourne, Australia October 21-23, 2009 October 21-23, 2009

Upload: marshall-eaton

Post on 22-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Industry’s Perspective of Design for Safety Regulations John Gambatese, Oregon State University, USA Alistair Gibb, Loughborough University, UK Phil Bust,

Industry’s Perspective of Industry’s Perspective of Design for Safety RegulationsDesign for Safety Regulations

John Gambatese, John Gambatese, Oregon State University, Oregon State University, USAUSA

Alistair Gibb, Alistair Gibb, Loughborough University, UKLoughborough University, UK

Phil Bust, Phil Bust, Loughborough University, UKLoughborough University, UK

Michael Behm, Michael Behm, East Carolina University, USAEast Carolina University, USA

CIB W099 ConferenceCIB W099 ConferenceWorking Together: Planning, Working Together: Planning, Designing and Building a Healthy Designing and Building a Healthy and Safety Construction Industryand Safety Construction IndustryMelbourne, AustraliaMelbourne, AustraliaOctober 21-23, 2009October 21-23, 2009

Page 2: Industry’s Perspective of Design for Safety Regulations John Gambatese, Oregon State University, USA Alistair Gibb, Loughborough University, UK Phil Bust,

Prevention through Design Prevention through Design (PtD)(PtD)

““Addressing occupational safety and Addressing occupational safety and health needs in the design process to health needs in the design process to prevent or minimize the work-related prevent or minimize the work-related hazards and risks associated with the hazards and risks associated with the construction, manufacture, use, construction, manufacture, use, maintenance, and disposal of maintenance, and disposal of facilities, materials, and equipment.” facilities, materials, and equipment.”

(http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/PTD/)

Page 3: Industry’s Perspective of Design for Safety Regulations John Gambatese, Oregon State University, USA Alistair Gibb, Loughborough University, UK Phil Bust,

Implementing PtD in Implementing PtD in ConstructionConstruction

Why design for construction safety?Why design for construction safety? Connection between design and site hazardsConnection between design and site hazards Ethical responsibilityEthical responsibility Ability to influence safety (hierarchy of Ability to influence safety (hierarchy of

controls)controls) Makes good business senseMakes good business sense Contractually obligatedContractually obligated Required by statute (some countries)Required by statute (some countries) Other… Other…

???

Page 4: Industry’s Perspective of Design for Safety Regulations John Gambatese, Oregon State University, USA Alistair Gibb, Loughborough University, UK Phil Bust,

Research StudyResearch Study

Assess the effects of the CDM Assess the effects of the CDM regulations on the construction regulations on the construction industry in the UKindustry in the UK Affect of CDM regulations on:Affect of CDM regulations on:

Design, construction, and safetyDesign, construction, and safety Perceptions of safety, roles on the project, Perceptions of safety, roles on the project,

and organizational and professional cultureand organizational and professional culture Management of projectsManagement of projects

Presence of innovative processes and Presence of innovative processes and productsproducts

Page 5: Industry’s Perspective of Design for Safety Regulations John Gambatese, Oregon State University, USA Alistair Gibb, Loughborough University, UK Phil Bust,

Research StudyResearch Study Focus group interviewsFocus group interviews

6 professional “communities”:6 professional “communities”: Architects, design engineers, facility owners/developers, Architects, design engineers, facility owners/developers,

constructors, manufacturers/suppliers, and H&S constructors, manufacturers/suppliers, and H&S consultantsconsultants

13 focus group interviews13 focus group interviews Total of 61 participants in interviewsTotal of 61 participants in interviews

Experience with CDM regulations: 1-18 years (mean = Experience with CDM regulations: 1-18 years (mean = 11.1)11.1)

46% from firms with >1,000 employees46% from firms with >1,000 employees 26% H&S consultation, 22% project management, 20% 26% H&S consultation, 22% project management, 20%

construction, 18% engineering, and 14% architectureconstruction, 18% engineering, and 14% architecture Industry sectors: 36% commercial, 35% industrial, 29% Industry sectors: 36% commercial, 35% industrial, 29%

infrastructure, and 28% residentialinfrastructure, and 28% residential

Page 6: Industry’s Perspective of Design for Safety Regulations John Gambatese, Oregon State University, USA Alistair Gibb, Loughborough University, UK Phil Bust,

Results: What is done Results: What is done differently now?differently now?

Changes since introduction of CDM Changes since introduction of CDM regulations:regulations: More safety notes/symbols on drawingsMore safety notes/symbols on drawings More pre-fabricationMore pre-fabrication More consideration of construction earlier in More consideration of construction earlier in

projectproject Safety constructability, not just constructabilitySafety constructability, not just constructability

More paperwork!!More paperwork!! Designer change in perspective regarding Designer change in perspective regarding

safetysafety More communication/collaboration as a teamMore communication/collaboration as a team

Causing them to “just do what they should do as Causing them to “just do what they should do as professionals”professionals”

““This is the real driver. CDM was just the catalyst.”This is the real driver. CDM was just the catalyst.”

Page 7: Industry’s Perspective of Design for Safety Regulations John Gambatese, Oregon State University, USA Alistair Gibb, Loughborough University, UK Phil Bust,

Results: Impact on ProjectsResults: Impact on Projects Change as a result of implementing PtDChange as a result of implementing PtD

(% of respondents)(% of respondents)

ItemDecreas

eNo

ChangeIncrease

Design cost (n=35) 6% 46% 49%

Construction cost (n=38) 34% 24% 42%

Design duration (n=37) 8% 57% 35%

Construction duration (n=39) 38% 44% 18%

Construction quality (n=39) 8% 28% 64%

Construction worker productivity (n=30)

13% 33% 53%

Construction worker health & safety (n=45)

4% 9% 87%

End-user health and safety (n=42) 5% 10% 86%

Page 8: Industry’s Perspective of Design for Safety Regulations John Gambatese, Oregon State University, USA Alistair Gibb, Loughborough University, UK Phil Bust,

Results: Barriers and Results: Barriers and EnablersEnablers Barriers:Barriers:

Designer education and trainingDesigner education and training Difficult for designers to assess risksDifficult for designers to assess risks

Also differences in risk thresholdsAlso differences in risk thresholds Lack of knowledge of CDM regulationsLack of knowledge of CDM regulations Too much paperwork!!Too much paperwork!! Separation of design and constructionSeparation of design and construction Competing priorities (safety vs. cost/schedule)Competing priorities (safety vs. cost/schedule)

Enablers:Enablers: Construction experience of A/EsConstruction experience of A/Es Integrated project delivery methods (e.g., design-Integrated project delivery methods (e.g., design-

build)build) A good CDM Coordinator and early involvementA good CDM Coordinator and early involvement

Page 9: Industry’s Perspective of Design for Safety Regulations John Gambatese, Oregon State University, USA Alistair Gibb, Loughborough University, UK Phil Bust,

Results: Desired ChangesResults: Desired Changes

Desires/Needs:Desires/Needs: Less paperwork!!Less paperwork!! Guidance on what designers should do in Guidance on what designers should do in

practice and what is better left up to the practice and what is better left up to the contractorcontractor

Improvements in safety and design cultureImprovements in safety and design culture Make CDM Coordinator a more “professional” Make CDM Coordinator a more “professional”

position, on the same level as the A/Eposition, on the same level as the A/E

Page 10: Industry’s Perspective of Design for Safety Regulations John Gambatese, Oregon State University, USA Alistair Gibb, Loughborough University, UK Phil Bust,

PtD Regulations: Issues to PtD Regulations: Issues to ConsiderConsider

Issues/concerns:Issues/concerns: Small projects vs. large projectsSmall projects vs. large projects Involvement/impact depends on industry sectorInvolvement/impact depends on industry sector On some projects:On some projects:

Just “doing the paperwork” (depends on CDM Coordinator)Just “doing the paperwork” (depends on CDM Coordinator) Alienating designers instead of engaging themAlienating designers instead of engaging them

Focus on “commercially practicable”Focus on “commercially practicable” Just documenting the risk and managing it as usual?Just documenting the risk and managing it as usual?

Minimal pushing of interventions up the hierarchy of Minimal pushing of interventions up the hierarchy of controlscontrols

Designing for operations and maintenance safety Designing for operations and maintenance safety viewed as satisfying CDM regulations?viewed as satisfying CDM regulations?

Construction safety still “passed on” to contractorConstruction safety still “passed on” to contractor

Page 11: Industry’s Perspective of Design for Safety Regulations John Gambatese, Oregon State University, USA Alistair Gibb, Loughborough University, UK Phil Bust,

PtD Regulations: Issues to PtD Regulations: Issues to ConsiderConsider

Issues/concerns:Issues/concerns: ““Whatever I do won’t help.”Whatever I do won’t help.” Planning Supervisor credibilityPlanning Supervisor credibility Design already optimized on standard projects?Design already optimized on standard projects? PtD message lost amid need to meet CDM PtD message lost amid need to meet CDM

regulationsregulations Where does designer’s responsibility end?Where does designer’s responsibility end? By doing PtD, is there now less of a need to do By doing PtD, is there now less of a need to do

downstream risk management?downstream risk management? Yes and NoYes and No

If no CDM, then PtD would not happen?If no CDM, then PtD would not happen? Yes and NoYes and No

Page 12: Industry’s Perspective of Design for Safety Regulations John Gambatese, Oregon State University, USA Alistair Gibb, Loughborough University, UK Phil Bust,

Thanks for ListeningThanks for Listening

Questions? Comments?Questions? Comments?

For more information:For more information: [email protected]@oregonstate.e

dudu [email protected]@lboro.ac.uk [email protected]@lboro.ac.uk [email protected]@ecu.edu