information architecture scenario based example_am102284811033

54
Information Architecture for Fabrikam Industries Intranet Fabrikam Industries is a fictional company name used for the purposes of demonstrating a typical approach to information architecture. Author Scott Case, InterKnowlogy Brief This paper is intended to represent the process that a medium-to-large organization may undergo when deploying Microsoft® Office SharePoint® Server 2007 in a practical scenario. Included are typical approach and implementation techniques that may occur when planning, customizing, and deploying an Office SharePoint Server 2007 installation. Rather than offer an overview of the features available to Office SharePoint Server 2007 and how to execute them, the goal of this paper is to communicate the logical approach that may occur during development and deployment. Many features in this paper are not applicable or available when using Microsoft® Windows® SharePoint® Services version 3.0. Target Audience This paper applies to both the business and technical stakeholders involved in Office SharePoint Server 2007 deployments. It is specifically targeted to the role of information architect, whose responsibility it is to determine how an organization may best employ the features and functionality available within the Office SharePoint Server 2007 platform and the complementary desktop applications. This role is typically a hybrid, containing a subset of skills traditionally associated with those of infrastructure manager, developer, business analyst, and information worker.

Upload: aamir97

Post on 07-Nov-2014

5.178 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Information Architecture for Fabrikam Industries IntranetFabrikam Industries is a fictional company name used for the purposes of demonstrating a typical approach to information architecture.

AuthorScott Case, InterKnowlogy

BriefThis paper is intended to represent the process that a medium-to-large organization may undergo when deploying Microsoft® Office SharePoint® Server 2007 in a practical scenario. Included are typical approach and implementation techniques that may occur when planning, customizing, and deploying an Office SharePoint Server 2007 installation.

Rather than offer an overview of the features available to Office SharePoint Server 2007 and how to execute them, the goal of this paper is to communicate the logical approach that may occur during development and deployment. Many features in this paper are not applicable or available when using Microsoft® Windows® SharePoint® Services version 3.0.

Target AudienceThis paper applies to both the business and technical stakeholders involved in Office SharePoint Server 2007 deployments. It is specifically targeted to the role of information architect, whose responsibility it is to determine how an organization may best employ the features and functionality available within the Office SharePoint Server 2007 platform and the complementary desktop applications. This role is typically a hybrid, containing a subset of skills traditionally associated with those of infrastructure manager, developer, business analyst, and information worker.

Page 2: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Information Architecture for Fabrikam Industries Intranet

The information contained in this document represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation on the issues discussed as of the date of publication. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information presented after the date of publication.

This White Paper is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT.

Complying with all applicable copyright laws is the responsibility of the user. Without limiting the rights under copyright, no part of this document may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), or for any purpose, without the express written permission of Microsoft Corporation.

Microsoft may have patents, patent applications, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights covering subject matter in this document. Except as expressly provided in any written license agreement from Microsoft, the furnishing of this document does not give you any license to these patents, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property.

Unless otherwise noted, the example companies, organizations, products, domain names, e-mail addresses, logos, people, places and events depicted herein are fictitious, and no association with any real company, organization, product, domain name, email address, logo, person, place or event is intended or should be inferred.

2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

Microsoft, Active Directory, Excel, FrontPage, SharePoint, SQL Server, Visual Studio, and Windows, are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.

The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.

Page 3: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Information Architecture for Fabrikam Industries Intranet

Contents1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................................................1

2 Usability........................................................................................................................................................................3

3 Branding and User Interface.......................................................................................................................................10

4 Metadata, Content Types, and Enterprise Search......................................................................................................18

5 Information Security...................................................................................................................................................33

6 Roles and Training......................................................................................................................................................35

Page 4: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

1 IntroductionFabrikam Industries represents a well-established and globally recognized manufacturer. The products it engineers and distributes are respected as much for their innovative design as for their reliability. To accomplish this level of quality, Fabrikam Industries goes to great lengths to foster an integrated corporate culture where involvement in the success of the organization occurs at every level. Building on ideas and efficiencies from across the organization has made it successful.

Fabrikam Industries maintains offices in the continental United States and in key locations across the world. Because of this, it faces challenges not only to its internal culture, but to overall business and communications in general. These challenges begin with the most basic of physical locality challenges and include language, time zones, corporate data centers, and international bandwidth limitations.

The investment in the Fabrikam Industries information architecture is significant. A company review shows the expected signs of organic growth resulting from company acquisitions and historical transitions in IT leadership. Within its own data center, it manages traditional service and line-of-business applications including e-mail, file sharing, finance, and a host of custom applications specific to departmental needs. Its dispersed corporate network is secured using a combination of industry standard firewalls, perimeter networks, and point-to-point connections. Because of legacy security concerns, employee use has been restricted to onsite access and limited VPN connectivity. Outside of normal employee channels, Fabrikam Industries has met with limited success in integrating external clients, partners, and contractors into the existing architecture.

Goals

In an effort to decrease training investments and their infrastructure management impacts, Fabrikam Industries has decided to consolidate its information worker Web interface onto a single platform. Specifically, the information technology (IT) team proposed a directed effort to bring the central data center and all branch offices onto a Microsoft® platform. From a directory perspective, if there is not a trust relationship between the domains, it makes the deployment a challenge, but with LDAP, Microsoft ASP.NET pluggable authentication, and membership providers, these challenges are able to be overcome.

During the next phase of scoping, the corporate intranet was identified as the next target for migration. The current intranet principally consists of a collection of news items, employee directory, corporate events, and links to content that resides on departmental file shares. Most changes require an IT request and a two-week lead-time.

After completing a discovery process that included stakeholder interviews and whiteboard sessions, it became clear that one site would not be sufficient for the needs of the organization. Specifically, integrating external users into the internal environment and Microsoft Active Directory® directory services brought concern from several departmental stakeholders. The outcome of this was that there needed to be an intranet portal site as well as an extranet collaboration portal site where clients, partners, and vendors could access project specific materials. High-level goals were as follows:

1

Page 5: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Provide a centralized location where users and managers can quickly locate corporate data critical to daily job performance.

Provide employees with a simple user experience that requires minimal training and is consistent throughout organizational departments and platform feature sets.

Ensure that the corporate brand and culture translates into a standardized user experience. Provide users with a rich search interface for returning content and metadata, not only from within the document

store but from external resources as well. Reduce IT workloads by providing powerful common management interfaces for content and organizational owners. Enable enterprise account authentication and user-managed authorization to corporate resources from inside or

outside physical offices.

Page 6: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

2 UsabilityWhen planning for a Microsoft Office SharePoint® Server 2007 deployment, some of the first considerations should include site topology, also known as taxonomy or site hierarchy. How your organization will best traverse your site and locate its content contributes greatly to a sense of location and in turn increases the perception of usability. A well-planned topology based on corporate work chains can prevent issues later where organic growth erodes usability. Considerations when planning should include corporate structure, stream of work within the organization, security, and user affiliations.

Tip: Site collections, sites, lists, and items are native security boundaries. Similar to the Windows file system, each child inherits from the security of its parent, unless assigned differently. The most effective containers for managing security remain sites and lists that take advantage of security inheritance. While discreet security may now be assigned to document or item-level data, this should be considered carefully as it requires an additional level of vigilance to ensure the appropriate assignments. These basic security concepts typically play a significant role in shaping site topology where site hierarchy based on existing Active Directory groups can leverage existing security implementations.

Taking this into account, an enterprise typically organizes site hierarchy by departmental structure and then departmental functionality. For example, a hierarchy may appear as Corporate Portal Site >> Human Resources >> Benefits. This approach works for most organizations small and large and is shown in the following diagram. A standardized hierarchy such as this provides not only a logical approach for users when browsing the portal site for content, but most likely mirrors existing security groups within the organization. As these clear organizational units, such as departments, are delegated control of their own site structures, they assume the management burden from IT resources. This ownership and freedom to customize their own environment can serve as a major catalyst in departmental and user acceptance.

An Office SharePoint Server 2007 Web application is the topmost Office Server 2007 object within the hierarchy and the native container of the topmost site collection. Each Web application designates the primary content database for the child site collection. The default Office SharePoint Server 2007 Web application is representative of a specific Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) Web site, and because of this defines a specific IIS application scope. This entitles each Office SharePoint Server 2007 Web application to its own Web.Config file and host header definitions. A Web application has no visual presentation within the user interface and it is in no way visually apparent to the end user.

Page 7: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

In the case of Fabrikam Industries , which must support Office SharePoint Server 2007 users located on different continents as well as users who speak different languages, additional complexities apply. For more information about multilingual deployments, download the white paper Plan for building multilingual solutions by using SharePoint Products and Technologies (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=79322). When the distance between a hosted Office SharePoint Server 2007 site and the end user allows for adequate bandwidth and latency, a single corporate instance of Office SharePoint Server 2007 can be more than adequate. As a rule of thumb, if a user can gain reasonable access to retrieve and save acceptable document sizes, then location need not be a concern as with most offices located within the continental United States. Apart from basic accessibility, geopolitical concerns such as localized working groups or governmental boundaries may insert themselves as requirements. If a company has headquarters in Washington, D.C., but also maintains offices within the borders of New York, then it may make sense to break off that working unit into its own sub-hierarchy, as shown in the following diagram. This allows for more freedom within that working group, where different rules and team members may apply.

Page 8: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Tip: Any Office SharePoint Server 2007 Web application can be extended into multiple zones. Extending a Web application to additional zones allows users to access the same Web site through separate and independent URLs, each with its own Web.Config file and IIS application scope. Each zone is configured with its own load-balanced URL (protocol, host header, and port). This allows, for instance, one Web application to make use of many configurations including multiple authentication stores, caching scenarios, content databases, or custom HTTP modules.

Not all Fabrikam Industries locations enjoy the access to bandwidth that the United States headquarters does; consequently, other locations may require a separate solution. In this case, Fabrikam Industries stakeholders decided that hosting an additional instance of Office SharePoint Server 2007 at the office in Beijing was the only option that satisfies the requirement for reasonable access to retrieve and save files. When implemented, this branch Office SharePoint Server 2007 instance was connected to its parent site at the corporate headquarters. Administrators of both locations must coordinate access to allow both parent and child sites to index the other’s content accordingly.

Tip: Separate portal site instances may be linked in a parent-child relationship by designating a portal site connection from the Site Collection Administration section of the Site Settings page of the top-level site in the child Office SharePoint Server 2007 instance (see the following figure). The advantages of such connections are limited and may not offer enough benefit in your instance to apply.

Page 9: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

When connected, content from the child site will be added to the parent search scope as well as set the corporate portal site as the root for child.

After this connection is made, navigation points from the parent portal site down to the child portal site must be added manually. There are several approaches, including: adding links within the portal site’s global navigation; links within the current navigation of a subsite; or links embedded within portal site content, such as link list Web Parts. Since Fabrikam Industries must accommodate a number of branch portals sites, an approach must be employed that does not overwhelm the navigation of the entire corporate site collection. At Fabrikam Industries , it was decided to include a static link from the corporate departmental subsites to their branch siblings by adding site URLs to a dedicated link list. In this case, a link from the corporate portal page was added for the Beijing portal page and, where appropriate, the same was done for departmental subsites. This can be seen represented as dotted lines in the international topology below.

Tip: Planning and architecture for Office SharePoint Server 2007http://technet2.microsoft.com/Office/en-us/library/b28ba53d-a3e8-440f-9fcb-f592d858894a1033.mspx?mfr=true

Page 10: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Languages in and of themselves are not functional limiters when planning a hierarchy, as each individual Office SharePoint Server 2007 site maintains discreet language control. Peer, child, and parent sites allow for language templates at any point of site creation within the site collection. In this case, Fabrikam Industries ’ United States-based headquarters enforces the exclusive use of English, while the Fabrikam Industries Asia Web site hosted in Beijing allows for a mix of Traditional and Simplified Chinese, Japanese, and Malay.

Office SharePoint Server 2007 supports languages through most major features within the application. Each site, site template, and MySite can be created in its own language when configured. When several languages will host the same site structure, variations may be implemented that allow an author to not only designate the primary language of a site, but also to mirror content for translation into another language. These variations of sites can be created for a variety of reasons, but note that this functionality is only available to Office SharePoint Server 2007 deployments. While the site creation process can be accomplished per location, the user interface is in one language. However, this page can easily be modified. Translation is not performed automatically, but can be configured to route through a workflow to assign a task to translate the content. This same functionality applies to lists and document libraries, so the data across the site becomes fully available on the site variations.

Tip: Site collections are the native containers of Office SharePoint Server 2007 sites. Each Office SharePoint Server 2007 Web application initially hosts a single site collection. Each site collection contains a single top-level site that in turn may

Page 11: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

contain any number of child sites. The top-level site collection in a Web application may contain site collections through the use of managed paths.

Each site collection enforces specific feature and security boundaries that cannot be inherited or discovered by a parent or child site collection. Features that are bound within a site collection and cannot be shared include global navigation, branding, security groups, content types, content sharing Web Parts, site aggregation Web Parts, usage reports, alert management and workflows. When attempting to make changes across multiple site collections such as deployment of Web Parts, content types, security changes, branding, and so on, use features to package the functionality that you desire. These features can either be activated automatically as the feature is deployed or activated on-demand by the site administrator. Solution deployment packages can be used to bundle features, Web Parts, assemblies, and pages. Rather than changing the site definition, which requires maintenance and complexity in upgrade, a solution deployment package can easily be deployed or removed, making it a great choice for consistency and ease of management.

What site collections do well is provide a well-defined security boundary and ease of portability. A site collection is really the unit of ownership, quota, and security management. Although site collections provide a boundary, they are an important aspect of deployment in relation to performance and management. Site collections can be backed up and moved into different content databases within the same Web application, but sites cannot. Your SQL team or storage manager may have suggestions for database sizes. Fabrikam Industries determined that 100 GB was the maximum database size for their top-level portal site collection as a best practice, taking into consideration manageability and backup restore and to avoid database blocking for long-running operations. All other department or division-level site collections were limited to a 15 GB quota, or moved into dedicated databases with 100 GB, again as the maximum database size. It was a compromise between the SQL team and the operations team, as well as design considerations for the information architecture. An existing site collection can be moved in its entirety to a new Office SharePoint Server 2007 Web application or server through simple backup and restore.

Now that Fabrikam Industries has divided its enterprise topology among geographies, corporate and local hierarchies could be treated as independent instances where each locale could deploy its own topology. As project discovery progressed, more than a few stakeholders indicated a need to protect entire department sites from non-departmental access. While it was demonstrated to all stakeholders that individual sites, document libraries, and lists could be individually secured, it was made very clear that several departments required more autonomy in automation, workflow, and structure. Stakeholders agreed that those departments with specific concerns would be required to maintain a corporate departmental site that provided all employees with unsecured content, while also maintaining their private departmental sites only available to departmental members. This resulted in the topology below.

Page 12: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Corporate Portal

Benefits Personnel

Corporate Sales

CorporateIT

Corporate HR

Private HR

Private Sales

Private IT

Asset Management

Site Collection Portal Site Database

Office SharePoint Server Web Application

In this diagram, you can see the outermost container representing the single Office SharePoint Server 2007 Web application hosting the site instance. The root site collection and topmost site represent an enterprise portal site template that will serve as the corporate home page and destination site. This topmost site is managed by corporate communications team members who hand-select audience-appropriate content for the home page. From this point on, each department takes ownership of its own site. However, it is important that corporate branding remains consistent throughout the portal site. It was for this reason that specific site templates were created for both corporate department sites and private department sites. This ensured that the colors, logos, and other branding elements would remain under the control of the portal site administrators, even though each department would have explicit control over its content.

Human Resources

The Human Resources department, maintaining stringent security concerns, also intends to automate much of its personnel forms. The previous decision for independent security, which included a private site for the department and independent forms automation with the corporate department site, necessitated the need to include the whole of

Page 13: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Human Resources within a single independent site collection. While this resolves Human Resources security and automation requirements, it does complicate branding deployment and navigation where this content does not cross site collection boundaries. These issues are explored more thoroughly later in this document.

The Human Resources corporate site will host employee manuals, payroll forms, and personalized benefits information. Microsoft® Office Forms Server 2007 automation will collect expense, time-off requests, and other employee processing data, then transmit that information to the departmental private site.

Sales

Sales department stakeholders determined there is little in the form of documented requirements, and expressed no need for site-level security. However, these stakeholders opted for both a corporate and private site to maintain consistency in the hierarchy. Sales goals and sales pipeline status would be provided by means of an executive dashboard format on the corporate departmental site, while client sales contracts and processing would be protected within the departmental private site through standard site-level security. Sales, which included the development of marketing materials, easily required the largest amount of storage both by number of documents and by way of contacts, as well as sheer document size of high resolution marketing materials.

Information Technology

Information Technology department stakeholders did express an interest in securing and maintaining discreet control over internal departmental documents, but voiced no concerns over maintaining any security at all over the corporate department site. Plans included a support ticket system maintained in the corporate department site and daily management content within their private site.

This completes the topology for the Fabrikam Industries corporate intranet. Departmental stakeholder requirements have been gathered, prioritized, and scoped. However, this is only the foundation and much remains to be done. Corporate branding and user interface are the next step in a process that will enable the planned topology to finally be built and deployed. After branding is complete, metadata planning will assist Fabrikam Industries in defining global content types and workflows.

Page 14: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

3 Branding and User InterfaceFabrikam Industries, as an organization, is invested heavily in creating strong brand awareness in its market segment. Its corporate logo and unique color palette are closely associated with its excellent reputation and one-of-a-kind product line. This brand identity is not only external, but is a critical part of the employee culture as well. Of paramount importance to stakeholders is that brand identity span to all corporate applications. The corporate Office SharePoint Server 2007 site must communicate the corporate presence and leave no question in the user’s mind that this is a Fabrikam Industries ’ Web property.

As with many enterprise organizations, Fabrikam Industries has made a significant investment in print medium through marketing and advertising. However, little of that investment translates into the digital presentation. When applying a corporate brand to a Web presence, it is not realistic to expect that a print style guide will translate directly to an HTML interface. It should be emphasized that HTML supports neither the rich text control of print, nor lavish images when limited bandwidth and down-level browser support are requirements. Organizations where branding is considered a priority typically maintain an in-house design staff or outsource this task to a design group. It is the designer’s responsibility to take the overall marketing plan and design guide into account when composing a customized Office SharePoint Server 2007 Web interface.

It’s important to differentiate print design skills from Web design skills. If print designers are not experienced in designing for Web interfaces, an overview of HTML as a design medium will prevent what can become significant design disconnects later on in the project. Some visual designers might be fully capable HTML and CSS developers, while some will pass off this task to a dedicated developer. You will most likely find that your information workers and Web developers can be very helpful with this phase, and should be included early in the process.

After an interface team has been identified, it is best to familiarize everyone with the new Office SharePoint Server 2007 controls and Web Parts that are available. While ASP.NET 2.0 functionality plays a significant role in how branding is deployed, Office SharePoint Server 2007 navigation, search controls, and Office SharePoint Server 2007 themes will be critical in how a customized look and feel are applied. After you are familiar with these components and controls, review the out-of-the-box site layout as it currently exists. In many cases, out-of-the-box master page functionality is robust enough to warrant only minor cosmetic changes, such as those to colors and headers. When more significant enhancements are dictated by requirements, consider beginning with wireframe mockups before fully developing graphic compositions or screenshots. This allows for strong functional validation before visual presentation overshadows features. Beginning development with impressive graphics compositions prior to functional wireframes may act as an easy selling tool for management, but often generates functionality requirements that are not requested in discovery and can significantly extend the level of effort in this phase of an Office SharePoint Server 2007 rollout.

Tip: Office SharePoint Server 2007 provides a true blank slate approach to branding, where most of the user interface may be completely redesigned to a detailed design requirement. ASP.NET 2.0 master pages allow for a globally applied template background to all of the Office SharePoint Server 2007 user and administration screens. By modifying or creating your own custom master page by using Microsoft® Office SharePoint® Designer 2007, unique visual presence and functionality can be achieved.

An example of a basic wireframe mirroring the functionality of the out-of-the-box functionality is shown in the diagram below. This breaks down functionality to its most basic component on a page.

Page 15: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

After the wireframe is drafted and its end-user functionality is validated, designers can apply branding and visual treatments to the interface. Visual compositions may go through several rounds to ensure that visual design, functional design, and stakeholder intent match. In fact, this phase should be carefully managed, because visual presentation is one of the few areas where the deliverable is so strongly based on personal perception that it is often difficult to compel all parties to agree.

Tip: Previous versions of Microsoft SharePoint Products and Technologies (Windows SharePoint Services and Microsoft Office SharePoint Portal Server) stored file modifications on the server’s physical file system. Artifacts such as style sheets, templates, pages, and other files that were modifications of template files became physical changes to files on a drive. This created several complications, not the least of which included backup scenarios and farm deployment.

Office SharePoint Server 2007 dramatically revamps this concept by moving out-of-the-box, custom, and modified assets completely into lists. Now user interface graphics, cascading style sheets, page layouts, and master pages are all contained in lists and are therefore in a content database on your back-end systems. This brings with it the added functionality of workflow approval, versions, automatic deployment, and fully inclusive backups. All of these administrative or public lists can be easily accessed by using the Office SharePoint Designer 2007 interface when managing layouts, master pages, or cascading style sheets.

Page 16: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

While you might not migrate your enterprise to the 2007 Microsoft Office system by using the same timeline as your Office SharePoint Server 2007 deployment, you will need to identify those users who perform design and workflow management tasks to receive Office SharePoint Designer 2007 during the deployment phase. This will not require the entire 2007 Office suite, but most of the new applications are complementary and an Office SharePoint Designer 2007 end user will gain productivity by installing all of the 2007 Office system in parallel.

Microsoft Office FrontPage® 2003 is not compatible with Office SharePoint Server and cannot be used for this development.

Introducing Microsoft Office SharePoint Designer 2007http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepointdesigner/HA100740831033.aspx

Get started with basic site customizationshttp://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepointdesigner/HA101741431033.aspx

Customizing and Branding Web Content Management-Enabled SharePoint Siteshttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa830818.aspx

After the combined functional and visual design is finalized, information workers will begin to incorporate the approved branding as new or modified master and layout pages. An information worker’s primary tool for branding is Office SharePoint Designer 2007. Through this environment, ASP.NET 2.0 master pages, Office SharePoint Server 2007 layouts, and cascading style sheets (CSS) can be edited by either the developer or designer. While it is true that Office SharePoint Designer 2007 is the replacement to FrontPage 2003, it is better to consider Office SharePoint Designer more as a successor than an upgrade. A combination of Web editor, Microsoft Visual Studio® 2007environment, and rich client, Office SharePoint Designer 2007 as an application is the true developers’ interface for Office SharePoint Server 2007.

Editor Interface

The Office SharePoint Designer page editor interface now more closely resembles a development environment than a Web editor, and directly supports ASP.NET 2.0 controls and Microsoft .NET script block coding. A split-screen interface allows for simultaneous drag-and-drop design as well as code view editing. Selecting a control element in either the design or the code view enables the Tag Properties and CSS Properties task panes with Visual Studio 2007 styles property grids. Other task panes, such as the Data Source Library, allow the designer to browse entire site lists as unique data sources and simply drag dynamic list-driven data onto a page. The depth and richness of this tool requires a learning investment on the part of the designer to fully explore and understand its capabilities.

Toolbox

Typically, when a third-party or custom component like a server control or Web Part is installed on the server, it cannot be rendered on the Web designer’s application, because the designer’s machine is not aware or licensed for the server’s add-ins. Office SharePoint Designer 2007 actually queries the available functionality and add-ins with the currently attached site and then tailors its own features based on this information. In the case of the Toolbox, a complete list of controls and Web Parts for the current site appears. When those controls are employed in a master page or layout, they render properly in the editor interface of Office SharePoint Designer 2007 in a manner that is consistent with the Visual Studio 2007 designer, even though there are no add-in assemblies installed on the Web designer’s desktop machine.

Page 17: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

This functionality extends deeper by providing page and content fields derived from the content type assigned to the current page layout. This enables an author, through a simple drag-and-drop action with these field controls from the Toolbox onto the page layout, to access contextual and content data without the need for manual control creation. After this is set, rich content and metadata can be used throughout a page for viewing or editing.

Managing Styles

When crafting a new interface within Office SharePoint Designer 2007, a key formatting component will include the management of cascading style sheets (CSS). A subset or complimentary standard to HTML, CSS allows for inherited and centralized application of branding. Arguably a specialty in its own right, CSS plays a major role in how visually compatible a site may be across different browsers. How different versions of different browsers render an interface depends greatly on how cascading style sheets have been implemented on top of and throughout the HTML layout. Older versions of these browsers can be much less complete in their standards implementations and will not recognize more advanced features. A down level experience should be addressed when taking advantage of richer features. From the Authoring tab of the Page Editor Options, an author can set the specific HTML and CSS schemas targeted for a site.

Page 18: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Office SharePoint Designer 2007 directly addresses this challenge by natively integrating CSS development into all aspects of the Page Editor interface. Office SharePoint Designer enumerates each style sheet referenced by a master page, page layout, or ASP.NET control and presents them all for review and editing within the Manage Styles task pane. Developers will find this functionality extremely useful.

Every style is editable by automatically duplicating core and theme styles into the local site or site collection list libraries when edits are necessary. This enables designers to modify or override any formatting within the Office SharePoint Server 2007 domain. Because of the versioned power of lists, changes to styles can be rolled-back to previous versions without affecting the site. Bear in mind that even with these new tools, CSS development is a specialty, and with complex issues like CSS importing and overriding inheritance, ensure that you use experienced Web developers to get the best results for your site.

Page 19: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Branding Application

When branding and user interface are applied to a SharePoint site, they is done using native ASP.NET functionality called master pages. Master pages are a relatively new concept to ASP.NET 2.0 and function as a background template for other .aspx pages in a Web site. This is a very powerful concept and one that allows sweeping global changes to be applied across a site. The diagram below provides a simplified view of how common functionality, such as search and navigation, is included within the master page and combined with an .aspx page layout to present a single experience to the end user.

Global Navigation

Navigation

Logo

Content

Title

Search

Global Navigation

Navigation

Logo Search

Title

WebPart Zone

Content

WebPart Zone

Master Page .aspx Page Layout Rendered SharePoint Site Page

+ +

Page 20: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Fabrikam Industries stakeholders had decided that the existing Office SharePoint Server 2007 branding was so different from the desired corporate look and feel that it would be best to begin with a new master page and apply branding there. Two techniques for this approach were considered, one by creating a new and truly empty master page, and later adding controls as needed. The second approach begins by copying an existing master page and then stripping away all HTML formatting and CSS styles to create a fully functional blank slate. In this case, the second approach was selected in favor of maintaining the existing functionality and applying a new look and feel from the corporate brand. This exercise of stripping away formatting was minimal and allowed for a unique HTML layout, as well as for a completely new Fabrikam Industries cascading style sheet.

Tip:

Master Pageshttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms443795.aspx

How to: Create a Minimal Master Pagehttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa660698.aspx

Customizing SharePoint Sites and Portalshttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms916801.aspx

Customizing the Menu Control—in Office SharePoint Server and Windows SharePoint Serviceshttp://blogs.msdn.com/ecm/archive/2006/12/02/customizing-the-wss-3-0-moss-2007-menu-control-mossmenu-source-code-released.aspx

Fabrikam Industries ’ most significant change was applied when it modified the existing navigational fly-out menus to better suit the design compositions. Once again, leveraging ASP.NET functionality implemented inside Office SharePoint Server 2007 and out-of-the-box navigation controls allow for significant interface change through control template mechanisms.

Seen below in the Office SharePoint Designer 2007 Split View mechanism, Fabrikam Industries needed to implement a stylized tab look to its global navigation. Here, a Web developer can create a simple or complex template to render rich, stylized UI without the need for third-party controls.

Page 21: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Tip: When modifying navigation, something as simple as the HTML below is the start to creating a fully customized user interface. From this basic template, rich, branded navigation can be created to meet the needs of most interfaces.

<StaticItemTemplate> <a href="<%# Eval("NavigateUrl") %>"> <%# Eval("Text") %> </a></StaticItemTemplate>

A working understanding of HTML is necessary, but the skill sets required of most Web developers will be enough to craft a genuinely compelling look and feel. Developers will want to leverage all the dynamic properties available by reviewing the complete list of MenuItem properties. Additional property values such as Selected, SeparatorImageUrl, and Target will allow a developer or designer to create very dynamic behaviors using data provided from the out-of-the-box Office SharePoint Server 2007 navigation management Web screens.

Page 22: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

MenuItem Propertieshttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.web.ui.webcontrols.menuitem_properties.aspx

Assets and Artifacts

During the branding phase, it becomes necessary to integrate custom artifacts and other assets including images, .aspx pages, CSS files, and even scripts into the Office SharePoint Server 2007 environment so they are accessible to the end user. Because most enterprise deployments provide for availability by farming Office SharePoint Server 2007 across multiple front-end Web servers, these assets must be deployed across the entire farm for use. For this reason, it is best to save all assets to a SharePoint list within the site collection. Whereas content images and assets can easily be stored in standard image or document libraries, user interface assets are slightly different in that only a designer should have access. Additionally, it is likely that such user interface assets are unique to the language of the site. Created to store interface files, the site collection style library is ideal. This specialized list will allow you to separate branding from user-managed assets. More importantly, this list will create a mechanism to manage interface assets for multiple languages implemented within the same site, which are known as variations.

Branding Deployment

Because Fabrikam Industries’ branding is deployed through a combination of master pages and layouts, these assets are maintained within a site collection boundary. For each nested site collection to assume the branding of the parent, all graphic elements must be copied there. This is not a straight-forward operation, because master pages are stored within the master page gallery, while graphic and CSS assets are stored within the style library by variation. Site collection administrators must take great care when developing a deployment methodology to address this. Scripts, Office SharePoint Designer 2007 packages, or simple export and import tasks for individual elements can be used, but no one option could be called ideal for all environments. When automation is paramount, then scripting these deployments is useful for complex repetitive tasks. Export and copy scenarios are simplest for one-off or changing scenarios. A combination of the two will most likely be necessary to promote branding in a production environment.

Page 23: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

4 Metadata, Content Types, and Enterprise SearchOffice SharePoint Server 2007 is a document and record repository. At its core, lists and document libraries hold content for versioning and retrieval. While application-based storage is not unique, this becomes a compelling environment in which business users can tag and retrieve the data they need quickly and easily. Office SharePoint Server 2007 provides many ways to access content but certainly encourages users to browse or search for what they need. Once again, this is not a wholly unique feature set, but the advantages gained from items and data stored within Office SharePoint Server is very useful when metadata relevancy can be used without the need for configuration.

Metadata allows an author or other user to attach supplemental information to a file or document without affecting its contents. These types of data are commonly available for documents stored within a file system by recording fields such as Created Date, Modified Date, Read Only, and Hidden attributes. Office SharePoint Server not only stores these file state data, but also allows for any number custom fields defined by the list owner. In much the same way that Windows allows users to sort and group files listed in Explorer, Office SharePoint Server moves this concept significantly further by allowing for saved views whereby customizable display styles allow users to filter, sort, group, limit, and total SharePoint list contents based on metadata criteria. This is an immensely powerful concept when looking for a type or category of document within a much larger set. Not only does metadata apply to browsing and views, but to search as well. In fact, search utilizes metadata not only for sorting and filtering as you would expect, but also as its basis for search result relevancy.

Lists

The most fundamental unit of storage in Office SharePoint Server 2007 is a list, which is a container based on rows and columns, much like a database table. Each row represents a single record and each column represents a unit of information available for each row. The advantage of lists over (SQL) database tables is that a SharePoint list is completely managed by an end user or site owner through the Web interface. No technical assistance is necessary to create, customize, or assign user privileges to a list. There are many predefined list content types that provide specialized functionality to the end user. Among them are document libraries, contact lists, a calendar, picture libraries, slide libraries, and custom lists. The most common is the document library where each row stores and versions an individual document and can even synchronize to a user’s desktop through Outlook 2007.

Every column in a list is considered metadata, and is available for use throughout most features in Office SharePoint Server. All available list types include predefined columns and allow for additional owner-defined columns. The following table shows basic list metadata types.

Metadata type Description

Single line of text User provides a single line of fixed text with a maximum length.

Multiple Lines of text User provides one or more lines of rich text that can be formatted.

Choice (Menu to choose from)

User selects from a predefined list of options in the form of a drop-down box, radio button list, or check box list. Fill-in answers are optionally allowed by the owner.

Number (1, 1.0, 100) User supplies a numeric value within the numeric ranges specified by the owner. Calculated values are optional.

Page 24: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Currency ($, ¥, €) User supplies a numeric currency value within the decimal and value ranges specified by the owner. The national currency is selected by owner.

Date and Time User supplies a date or date and time as specified by the owner. Calculated values may be set by the owner.

Lookup (information already on this site)

User selects from a predefined list of options in the form of a drop-down box, radio button list, or check box list. Available options are derived from SharePoint list data on the same SharePoint site.

Yes/No (check box) Users provide yes or no data by checking or clearing a box based on the title and description criteria.

Person or Group User selects from a predefined list of users. Owner specifies by which criteria the list of users is to be populated.

Hyperlink or Picture User provides a valid URL and optional text label or image path to serve as the link body. Owner selects whether the user is to specify URL or image data.

Calculated (calculation based on other columns)

A calculated column is read only and presents information to the user by manipulating existing list data into a required format. This formula may concatenate text data or calculate a mathematical formula to achieve its result.

Business Data User selects from a predefined list of options. Available options are derived from Business Data Catalog selected by the owner.

Content Types

Content types do not store data as a list would, but describe the properties of data, and are considered the basic level for describing content. A content type may have many properties, termed content columns, and each column may be of a data type included earlier in the lists section. There are many pre-defined content types for each site collection, and administrators may change or create additional content types as needed. Just as .NET interfaces in application development support inheritance, each content type inherits from a parent content type. Thus, a child assumes all of its column types. For example, if the content type Item includes columns A, B, and C, then the content type Document, which inherits from the Item type, will also include columns A, B, and C.

In fact, one content type or another describes every item stored within a SharePoint list, and each list or list type may have one or many content types assigned. A list inherits the content columns from all the assigned content types, which appear as list columns.

Page 25: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

The following table shows special content column types not immediately available to lists. These special content types are associated with the Publishing feature.

Column type Description

Full HTML content with formatting and constraints for publishing

Intended for Enterprise Content Management this type allows for complete control over HMTL content including referenced image and document assets. Discreet control over HTML content can be set when placing content field controls within SharePoint page layouts.

Image with formatting and constraints for publishing

Intended for Enterprise Content Management, this type allows for a single image reference and browsing assets within existing image libraries. Discreet control over images can be set when placing content field controls within SharePoint page layouts.

Hyperlink with formatting and constraints for publishing

Intended for Enterprise Content Management, this type allows for a single URL. Discreet control over HTML content can be set when placing content field controls within SharePoint page layouts.

Summary Links data Intended for use in Enterprise Content Management layouts, this type allows for a bulleted content

Page 26: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

supplied by the authors without the need for a dedicated list to populate data. Discreet control over summary links behavior can be set when placing content field controls within SharePoint page layouts.

Search

After metadata are defined and populated, they become accessible within not only the lists and views themselves, but are also available and searchable throughout the SharePoint site. A user that is not browsing for content is most likely searching for metadata. The basic search box control located by default on every page of a SharePoint site uses keywords to document not only its content but through metadata as well. As search, this is an effective approach to locating documents, but it cannot always provide the discreet focus a user needs. To accommodate additional control, search allows for ad hoc metadata filtering by allowing the user to include or exclude specific keywords by global content type columns. Shown in the screenshot below, three properties have been selected from available content columns. This substantially focuses the scope of a keyword search to very specific criteria and can provide for much more successful results when searching through thousands or tens of thousands of documents.

Fabrikam Industries

After an extensive discovery and stakeholder review of document use and email attachment traffic, Fabrikam Industries decided that in order to effectively use Office SharePoint Server 2007 for its content, it needed to filter and group its documents by department ownership and assigned fiscal year. Requirements included the following:

1) Fabrikam Department must collect metadata as a multi-select drop-down box that includes the values Human Resources, Operations, Information Technology, Sales, and Executive Staff.

2) Fabrikam Fiscal Year must collect metadata as a multi-select drop-down box that includes the values 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.

3) Fabrikam Department and FabrikamFiscal Year are required fields. Required fields must be enforced within the user interface so that the author must populate data.

4) Both Fabrikam Department and Fiscal Year must be searchable.

5) All documents must use the Fabrikam Department and Fabrikam Fiscal Year fields.

Based on these requirements, it was decided that both fields needed to be site columns so they would be available to enterprise search, and then added to the document content types so that every document in the site collection would require these specific metadata. The group briefly considered creating a custom list template that would include these

Page 27: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

two columns locally in the list, but this design was ruled out as there were too many ways to circumvent the requirement.

Adding these metadata to the site collection begins by selecting site columns from the Site Settings page of the topmost site collection. The Site Columns page displays a long list of columns already available within the site collection. Creating a new column appears much like adding a new local column to a list. For the Fabrikam Fiscal Year column, the Choice data type was selected, which allowed for the manual entry of the values 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008. You will notice in the column screenshots that within the Group section, New Group was selected and labeled Fabrikam. This separates the new columns within the master list into their own section. Also note that the Require this column contains information has been checked so that that it cannot be left blank by the author.

When adding the Fabrikam Department column, it was decided that that the department options would be more volatile than Fiscal Year options, so a Fabrikam Departments list was created in the portal site. Each department was added to this list. When the Fabrikam Department column type was added, the Lookup data type was selected, which allowed the new list to be identified as the source for the department options. This now allowed other end users to manage the option data through the new departments list, rather than the site collection administrator altering the static column data.

Tip:Plan content types (Office SharePoint Server)http://technet2.microsoft.com/Office/en-us/library/63bb092a-00fe-45ff-a4b8-d8be998d1a3c1033.mspx

Page 28: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Fiscal Year Global Column Type Department Global Column Type

After the two site columns had been created, they were added to the Document content type. This interface can be located by selecting Site Content Type Gallery from the Site Settings page and adding the two new columns. Once completed, Fabrikam Departments and Fabrikam Fiscal Year become required metadata for every document stored within the Fabrikam Industries intranet. This can be quickly validated by selecting New Document from the menu of any document library in the SharePoint site collection. When the document opens in Microsoft Word 2007, the two new columns present themselves automatically in the Document Information Panel that emerges from Office (2007) Ribbon. This interface denotes and enforces that the author must provide content for all required fields. Notice in the ribbon screenshot below that the Fabrikam columns display the pre-populated options from both the static Fiscal Year options and the list-driven Department options. After this document is saved, all values are sent back to the server as metadata and stored within the correlating list columns.

Page 29: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Tip: Now that the two new columns have been mapped to the document properties courtesy of 2007 Office, we can now include this data through Quick Part Properties. From the Insert Ribbon Tab, select Quick Parts >> Document Properties >> Fabrikam Departments. This inserts a dynamic field control into your document that not only reflects the current column data wherever it is placed, but also allows the same data to be edited from within the document. All these changes are updated in the list columns and available to search after the document is saved.

Fabrikam Industries Search

Now that Fabrikam Industries has defined and populated Department and Fiscal Year data, these metadata must be made available within the advanced search screen. This does not happen automatically, as with the changes to the document libraries. For this, the Advanced Search page must be edited, and the search Web Part modified to reflect the new content columns. The search Web Part Properties group includes a Properties input field where the Web Part behavior can be modified. A large XML block describes a list of options that include language, searchable properties, and result fields for each searchable content type. These configurations are defined as one single fragment so it is best to copy the entire block manually and edit it within Office SharePoint Designer 2007. Locate the property and results elements that apply so that Fabrikam Department and Fabrikam Fiscal Year can be added, then paste this information back into the Web Part XML block. After the Advanced Search page has been saved and published, it will allow for property restrictions and result sets that include Fabrikam’s two new content columns, as shown in the screenshot below.

Page 30: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Tip: SharePoint lists and document libraries are a significant paradigm shift for users accustomed to the network file shares. The most successful SharePoint deployments migrate their primary network file shares into the SharePoint environment by using well-organized document libraries, which eliminates most (if not all) mapped drive letters from a user’s drive. The advantages to this—such as security, auditing, versioning, search indexing, accessibility, and content types—should be clear, but users seldom embrace this change until they have been motivated to invest in learning the new system.

Fabrikam Industries found that content types did not traverse the site collection boundary. Any content type created within the parent site collection is not inherited by the child site collection. For this reason, Fabrikam Industries decided to create site templates where the content type modifications were already present and these templates would provide the foundation for all subsequent site collections. If any updates are needed to the existing content types, Fabrikam Industries will use solution deployments packages to make the necessary changes.

Microsoft Workflow and ECM starter kits accelerated deployment and understanding. Fabrikam Industries planned to create and use custom-created workflows only on knowledge repositories and use the out-of-the-box workflows with Office SharePoint Designer for most cases.

Download:Deploying a Solutionhttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa544500.aspx

Enterprise Content Management Starter Kit and Requirements Authoring Starter Kithttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/office/aa905355.aspx

Page 31: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

4.1 Enterprise IntegrationIt is safe to say that today Office SharePoint Server is not the single repository for all enterprise data. There will continue to be a wealth of data spread throughout large and small organizations on different platforms. Structured data that resides in applications such as CRMs, ERPs and proprietary systems based on flat file, relational and OLAP data structures are prime candidates for Office SharePoint Server integration. The strength of Office SharePoint Server will be in acting as the integration point into this data by presenting it in a format accessible to the entire organization, not just those with the appropriate trainings or desktop applications. Addressing this need of external application data, Office SharePoint Server 2007 Enterprise edition introduced the Business Data Catalog. The Business Data Catalog is an open interface for internalizing foreign application data by mapping ODBC or Web Service interfaces into Office SharePoint Server. Through standardized XML, configuration files, tables, views, stored procedures, Web methods, and entity relationships can be defined for use natively within Office SharePoint Server.

Core features for the Business Data Catalog include:

a) Read access of external data stores.

b) Data or SharePoint tier security delegation for individual data entities.

c) Indexing and retrieving data through SharePoint Search and dedicated search scopes.

d) Drag-and-drop Web Part access to Business Data Catalog entities based on user rights.

e) List and content column integration.

f) Supplemental user profile data.

Functionality

Every connection from the Business Data Catalog to an external data source is defined as a Business Data Catalog application. Each application exists as a collection of nested structures that include applications, entities, and methods and actions. Applications contain one or many entities and entities contain one or many methods and/or actions. Office SharePoint Server 2007 does not provide a user interface for the configuration of an application, but does require a detailed XML application definition. Due to the complexities of XML and application data structures, the creation of this definition typically requires a savvy information worker or experienced software engineer. Partners have created tools to make the creation of these definition files easier.

Structure Description

Application Serves as the definition and boundary for the connection to a single data source. This level stores connection string or location data for databases and Web services. Normally, user account information is passed through to the data store, but fixed account log-in information can be provided here if it is desirable for all users to access a repository using a single user account.

Entity Can be characterized as a single two-dimensional data structure analogous to a relation data table or potentially more abstract such as a Web method result set.

Method Analogous to an API method or Web method and defines specific get and set functionality for retrieving

Page 32: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

and sending data. Office SharePoint Server 2007 requires specific flagged methods for record and search interaction. These methods may include embedded SQL statements for querying data or may leverage existing stored procedures depending on the availability within the source data store.

Action Provides a means to exercise some sort of functionality on an entity record. For example, a Business Data Catalog entity record returned as part of a Office SharePoint Server search result set requires a link for a user to obtain more detail about that search result. A Business Data Catalog action provides the mechanism for Office SharePoint Server to insert a custom URL that will provide that data. One of the only Business Data Catalog options configurable using the SharePoint Service Provider interface, action URLs can include query string or form header data based on individual Business Data Catalog fields so that requests may include state full information necessary for record retrieval in an entity detail page.

The Business Data Catalog is considered to be a Shared Service Provider (SSP), and is managed through the SharePoint Central Administration Shared Services Web site. After the application definition has been uploaded, the structures of the application can be viewed and validated from this interface. If the required authorizations are not accommodated by the external data store or additional SharePoint-level security is necessary, permissions can be assigned through this interface on an application or entity level. This allows an application to be tested and tuned within a development or staging environment then later deployed to a production SSP when validated and finalized.

Tip: The Business Data Catalog provides the BdcMetadata.xsd file, an XML schema definition file (XSD) that defines the XML element mapping structure necessary for creating an application definition file. When authoring metadata using Microsoft Visual Studio 2005, valuable IntelliSense support can be gained by copying XML definition to a working folder and setting the schemaLocation attribute of the root element to point to this schema. The BdcMetadata.xsd file can be located in the \Bin folder of the Office SharePoint Server 2007 installation directory, typically located at <Root>\Program Files\Microsoft Office Server\12.0\Bin\.

Fabrikam Industries

Early on, Fabrikam Industries identified a relational data structure supporting its product catalog system for inclusion within the Office SharePoint Server portal site. This application had evolved internally and worked well although order processing, product fulfillment, inventory, and call center systems were all relegated to their own dedicated applications. Those not directly related to these activities had very little access to product detail or pricing. It was management’s desire to make these data available to everyone within the organization regardless of role or training.

Fabrikam Industries was beginning plans for the development of a dedicated custom Web application to perform this task when stakeholders for the Office SharePoint Server deployment team recognized the Business Data Catalog as a potential match for the functionality requirements. Though the original product catalog stakeholders indicated significant complexities with the requirements, it was found that only three tables were necessary for viewing by employees. Stored in a Microsoft SQL Server® 2005 instance, this included two navigational tables and a product detail table. These tables (shown in the figure below) have clear relationships pre-defined. Upon review, there were no integration concerns.

Page 33: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Stakeholders in the Fabrikam Industries Office SharePoint Server solution scheduled a planning meeting with the corporate owners of the data store. When it was surfaced that all corporate users required explicit read access to SQL tables (though by means of a proxy) through the Business Data Catalog, there were serious concerns raised by the SQL administrators. Intense discussions followed regarding security approaches for critical corporate data. It was vigorously debated whether to use a single authenticated service account or a custom proxy Web service, or whether users would indeed be granted the explicit SQL table access rights requested by the team developing the Office SharePoint Server solution. A single user account would allow for simple integration but would treat all users with identical rights and provide no mechanism for individual user auditing. A Web service would allow custom interfaces to intercept and proxy requests to the data store, thereby accommodating hard perimeter network boundaries where network security is factor. Direct SQL table access lets users’ accounts pass directly to the data store where the SQL server decides which data is appropriate for a specific user and logs access in the process.

After weeks of protracted discussions and prototyping, it was agreed upon by both the SharePoint team and the SQL administrators that users would indeed have specific read access to the necessary data tables. In the end, what the prototyping found was that core application users already possessed this access at a minimum and the additional read access for the whole of the company posed no additional threats and presented no new potential attack surfaces for the server running SQL Server.

Page 34: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Tip: When developing Business Data Catalog Application definitions, the easiest approach to creating the definition is to include all fields in the table, making them available for later use by anyone. Typically, an organization will be very selective as to which fields are available to end users. Depending on the architecture of your application, some fields may be sensitive or even encrypted. This can produce extended discussions on which fields are useful and appropriate for users throughout the organization. It may be that an organization decides to create multiple application definitions to the same data structure, one perhaps complete with all fields and one restrictive with limited field access, then assigning specific permissions only allowing all company access to the more restrictive of the definitions.

Data resources now cleared for use, a task was assigned to an internal software engineer to create an application definition for the tables shown above. Developing the XML definition is not a simple task, and should not be assigned to anyone other than a software engineer. The XML relationships can be daunting at times and require a deep understanding of Office SharePoint Server, .NET data types, SQL queries, XML, and relational data. Expect that the responsible engineer will be subject to a longer ramp-up time than for other new interfaces. It’s advisable to execute this phase in a development environment where the data source and Office SharePoint Server 2007 will not impact or interact with production data.

While Fabrikam Industries originally considered this information to be freely available to anyone in the organization, it was later recognized that clients and vendors with network access and corporate accounts should not have access to product inventory, catalog subsets, or pricing information. Instead, they should use existing avenues for review. To this end, these users, who are also users of the intranet, must be excluded from access to this Business Data Catalog application. This can be accomplished by setting the appropriate application- or entity-level permissions. These rights are assigned through the SharePoint Shared Service Provider interface. By accessing any Business Data Catalog application or entity through the Web management pages, discreet permissions are available. Because Business Data Catalog data is hosted within the Shared Service Provider scope, any Office SharePoint Server Web application connected to the SSP will have access to the defined application definitions. This should be considered when assigning permissions.

Web Parts

Web Parts are the easiest way to surface data from the new definition. When clicking Add a Web Part on any Office SharePoint Server page, select Business Data List and add it to the page. When first added, the Web Part properties must be set to use an available Business Data Catalog entity as its source.

Page 35: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

In this example, the Product Category Entity is selected. When added, it displays all fields available to the entity. For readability, it is best to select Edit View from the toolbar. This interface is similar to a list view management screen and will allow the configuration of which fields and rows are displayed for a user.

In the example below, the same Web Part is configured to display only the Name field and no more than five records.

Page 36: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

For a more interactive experience, take advantage of established relations ships and connect Web Parts together. Add a Business Data Related list Web Part and select a Business Data Catalog entity with a relationship. In fact, when using this particular Web Part and selecting a Business Data Catalog entity, the interface only displays entities with defined relationships. Once again, set the Edit View options so that only the name is shown and the Web Part presents a clean, simple interface to end users. Next, using the standard Web Part Connections menu, set the Product Subcategory Web Part to retrieve data from the Product Category Web Part. Automatically, the Category Web Part will display option buttons for selection and, when clicked, immediately filter Product subcategory results.

Repeat the same process to connect a product entity to the Subcategory Web Part. Next, add a Business Data Item Web Part to display the product detail. After all the Web Parts have been connected, you will have created a respectable viewing interface useful for navigating from Category to Subcategory, Subcategory to Products, and Products to Product Detail all with Web Parts and a single XML application definition required only once at the initial setup. This same data can be reapplied on any page within the site collection and customized for each use.

Content types and list columns also use the very same application definition within the Business Data data type, which will provide lookup data type functionality populated by a Business Data Catalog data source. This provides for very powerful scenarios such as a list of departments provided by a customer relationship management system or a list of

Page 37: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

office locations provided by a custom database. like drop-down box departments provided by a CRM system or office locations provided by a custom database.

Search

The final step in Business Data Catalog deployment is adding the Business Data Catalog application to the enterprise search results. This allows the use of the existing search functionality to locate Business Data Catalog content alongside standard SharePoint corporate document content. These sources can be included in different scopes for more discreet control and even mapped to content types. This application can be added as a search source from the Shared Service Provider interface by selecting Search Settings >> Content Sources >> New Content Source. This registers the Business Data Catalog application with the search crawler and allows it to be indexed on a one-time, inclusive or independent schedule.

Tip:Plan for business data connections with the Business Data Cataloghttp://technet2.microsoft.com/Office/en-us/library/c803c1fa-cb0f-4a26-b439-de7ff4195e2c1033.mspx

Page 38: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

5 Information SecurityOne of the most common requirements of any system is reporting. It is usually listed as a top five must-have requirement by stakeholders and yet seldom makes it to the final list of deliverables due to time, cost, or application functionality. Relegated to a later phase, most reporting never happens. Office SharePoint Server 2007 arrives with significant out-of-the-box reporting that requires little-to-no configuration.

Settings required for documents and content auditing requires no more than simple checkboxes. Found in the Site Collection section of the Site Settings menu, Configure Audit Settings is easy to use. By selecting the appropriate auditing levels, seen in the screenshot below, Office SharePoint Server gathers user activity data that are then available as Excel reports from the Site Settings menu.

Information Management Policies

Where lists are concerned, an Information Management Policies can be set for each content type assigned to the List or Document Library. This is extremely powerful in that an owner can manage policies for Document Labels, Document Auditing, Scheduled Expiration, and automated Barcodes for discreet Content Types. If these need to be enforced across site collections, information policies can be added to the site template or deployed using Solution Deployment packages produced by the development team and deployed by the farm administrator. Be aware that turning on all auditing settings across all sites can affect server performance as it will log each event.

Labels Document labels allow a policy to enforce that important metadata be printed with every document regardless or content or author. Information such as content ownership, project, SharePoint site, other assigned metadata is printed as part of the document. These labels may set so that they are protected from the author or may be changed based on policy requirements.

Page 39: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

Auditing Auditing allows a policy to enforce logging of opening, editing, check-out state, movement and deletion or restore by content type. Each event is viewed by list-level reporting available in the List Settings interface. This should be orchestrated so that site collection-level auditing is not duplicated by a policy and therefore duplicates the work executed on the server.

Expiration Many times due to governmental or corporate document retention policies, an item may necessitate a set lifespan. For example, sensitivity or archiving may require a document to be set for deletion within seven years of the last date and time that the document was created or modified. Expiration events may trigger a delete activity or initiate a published workflow. A workflow offers the most power and can automate decisions for whether a document is retained, reassigned, or archived to low-cost storage. There are many approaches offered here and all should be reviewed for options that fit your requirements.

Barcodes In order to facilitate tracking of physical paper documents within an office or system, standardized and unique barcodes can be assigned to each document. If an existing mechanism exists within the organization, a barcode may be arbitrarily assigned to a document for physical tracking.

Tip: Define document retention policyhttp://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepointserver/HA100951621033.aspx?pid=CH101176771033

Page 40: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

6 Roles and TrainingIf it is not apparent by now, Office SharePoint Server 2007 is not merely an install-and-walk-away deployment. What ensures its success is the people who use it. Thus, their needs should be determined well before any installation occurs. Understanding how an organization consumes and distributes its data is critical to how Office SharePoint Server is enabled and configured. Early in the discovery process, consider gathering representatives from across the organization to form a stakeholder’s group. These members will be your guide not only to a successful deployment, but also to getting the word out and generating real interest company-wide.

While the Office SharePoint Server user interface should be considered user friendly and presents a small learning curve for anyone familiar with Web use and the Internet, remember that its new concepts and sheer number of options can appear daunting to many corporate users who are steadfast in their use of corporate file shares. Many users are personally attached to their corporate mapped drives. When deploying Office SharePoint Server 2007, be sure and include a training program not only for the administrators and developers, but also the designers and information workers. Your ability to help them understand the company strategy and vision will directly impact adoption.

When training users, consider creating a demo environment where each user completes activities in Office SharePoint Server in an environment which mimics production. Compel users to perform role appropriate tasks such as creating a site, creating a list, and adding their favorite co-workers to the site’s contact list. Whatever Office SharePoint Server functionality considered core to corporate goals should be provided as a hands-on in training or many corporate users will never explore beyond their simple own daily tasks.

As challenging as it may be at times, always consider users when planning an Office SharePoint Server deployment. Everyone who uses Microsoft Office Word or Microsoft Office Excel® is also interacts with Office SharePoint Server.

System administrator This role is responsible for server and database management. Individuals in this role allocate physical infrastructure, install Office SharePoint Server, provision and configure Web applications, and provide for top-level security administration. They are also responsible for deployment practices, SharePoint central administration, monitoring, maintenance, backup and restore, disaster recovery, and management of Shared Service Providers.

Information worker This role configures and extends site- and list-level feature sets. This includes branding, advanced Web Part features, workflows, and other integration points. Training should include Office SharePoint Designer, and the Shared Service Provider interface for search or other service management (optional); Site Settings; tools such as InfoPath and Office SharePoint Designer; and standard SharePoint site administrator interfaces.

End users This role accounts for the majority of Office SharePoint Server users and skills will vary greatly. Core daily use will include basic navigation, search, and document management. Transitioning from a traditional file server-based network to a SharePoint store is a significant paradigm shift and some users can encounter difficulty with change. Beyond

Page 41: Information Architecture Scenario based example_AM102284811033

basic user interface, the focus should be on understanding lists, user interfaces, navigation, workflows, upload, offline, and interaction with client applications.

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 provides a robust platform to create and deploy enterprise functionality with little to no custom development. Only a selected set of features available were presented in this document and it is recommended that additional time be set aside for research when preparing your own deployment. The most successful Office SharePoint Server projects spend dedicated time planning and documenting with stakeholders a detailed roadmap of features and phases for installation.

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepointserver/FX100492001033.aspx

MSDN Guide to Office SharePoint Server 2007 Featureshttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms561082.aspx

Office SharePoint Server 2007 on TechNethttp://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepointserver/default.aspx

Technical Library Office SharePoint Server 2007http://technet2.microsoft.com/Office/en-us/library/3e3b8737-c6a3-4e2c-a35f-f0095d952b781033.mspx