inmates and immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of...

28
INMATES AND IMMIGRANTS FEDERAL PROVISION OF HEALTHCARE MARY DRAGO, PHD ARIZONA BIOETHICS NETWORK [email protected] MAY 16, 2018

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

INMATES AND IMMIGRANTSFEDERAL PROVISION OF HEALTHCARE

MARY DRAGO, PHD

ARIZONA BIOETHICS NETWORK

[email protected]

MAY 16, 2018

Page 2: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

DISCLAIMER I am expressing my own views

Page 3: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

FEDERAL PROVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES

Besides to active military personnel, the US government provides health services to three groups: Veterans through the VA

American Indians/Alaska Natives through IHS

Federal Detainees and Prisoners

Page 4: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

FEDERAL HEALTH PROVISION

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Wait time for Appts (days)

Wait Times (Days)

US Veterans AI/AN

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

Life Expectancy (yrs)

Life Expectancy (Years)

US Male Veterans Female Veterans AI/AN

Page 5: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

BUREAU OF PRISONS

Page 6: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

BUREAU OF PRISONS

It is the mission of the Federal Bureau of Prisons to protect society by confining offenders in the controlled environments of prisons and community-based facilities that are safe, humane, cost-efficient, and appropriately secure, and that provide work and other self-improvement opportunities to assist offenders in becoming law-abiding citizens.

The Health Services Division is responsible for medical, dental, and mental health (psychiatric) services provided to Federal inmates in Bureau facilities, including health care delivery, infectious disease management, and medical designations. The Division also coordinates the BOP's Safety Program (Occupational Safety, Environmental Health, and Life Safety and Fire Protection), which ensures a safe, healthy environment for staff and inmates. Additionally, the Division manages the Food Service Program in BOP facilities.

2016 mission: To deliver medically necessary health care to inmates effectively in accordance with proven standards of care without compromising public safety concerns inherent to the Bureau’s overall mission.

Page 7: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

ARRESTS & PRE-TRIAL DETENTIONS

Bureau of Prisons

DHS 60%

Customs and Border 40 %

ICE 19%

Secret Service 1%

DOJ 36%

Marshals 21%

FBI 6%

DEA 5%

ATF 3%

US Marshals

Page 8: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

FEDERAL PRISON POPULATION

Page 9: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

JUNE 24, 2017

Out of the 187,855 inmates in BOP custody, 42,034 are foreign-born. (24%)

The breakdown of the 42,034 non-citizens is as follows:

19,749 (46.9%) have received final orders of removal;

21,121 (50.2%) are under ICE investigation for possible removal;

1,157 (2.8%) have cases pending adjudication before an Immigration Judge in the Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR); and

Seven (.0002%) have been granted relief.

Page 10: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

CONTRACT PRISONS

Page 11: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

HEALTH CARE FOR INMATES

8th Amendment

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted

14th Amendment for States

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

Health care for prisoners was not in the public eye until the case of Newman v. Alabama (1972) that found the entire state correctional system of Alabama to be in violation of the 8th- and 14th-amendment rights of its inmates by failing to provide them with adequate and sufficient medical care.

Page 12: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

BOP MEDICAL POLICIES

4 CARE levels

CARE Level 1 & 2 assigned by BOP clinicians

CARE level 3 & 4 with progressively increasing health needs decided by BOP’s Office of Medical Designation

5 levels of medical intervention

Medically necessary – acute or emergent

Medically necessary – non-emergent

Medically acceptable – not always necessary

Limited medical value

Extraordinary

Page 13: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

BOP MEDICAL POLICIES

4 CARE levels

CARE Level 1 & 2 assigned by BOP clinicians

CARE level 3 & 4 with progressively increasing health needs decided by BOP’s Office of Medical Designation

5 levels of medical intervention

Medically necessary – acute or emergent

Medically necessary – non-emergent

Medically appropriate– not always necessary (joint replacement, knee repair)

Limited medical value

Extraordinary

Page 14: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

HEALTH CARE IN PRISON

(Using 2004 data, Wilper et al) “Many inmates with a serious chronic physical illness fail to receive care while incarcerated.”

Among inmates with a persistent medical problem, 13.9% of federal inmates had received no medical examination since incarceration.

Following serious injury, 7.7% were not seen by medical personnel.

OIG Audits:

Mental health

Staff

Private Prisons

Page 15: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org
Page 16: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT

Page 17: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

ICE DETENTION

Page 18: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE)

ICE oversees 198 detention facilities. As of March 4, 2017, ICE’s Average Daily Population (ADP) in detention was 41,005

10 percent are housed in federally owned and directed facilities

65 percent are housed in facilities operated by private, for-profit contractors

25 percent are housed in facilities operated by county jails or other local or state govt entity

Page 19: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org
Page 20: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

HEALTH CARE TO IMMIGRATION DETAINEES

Immigration detainees are not convicted prisoners.

Their protections are thus derived from the Fifth Amendment, which protects any person in the custody of the United States from conditions that amount to punishment without due process of law

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has held that conditions of confinement for civil detainees must be superior not only to convicted prisoners, but also to pre-trial criminal detainees.

Page 21: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE)

The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Health Service Corps (IHSC) provides direct care to approximately 13,500 detainees housed at 21 designated facilities throughout the Nation to include medical, dental and mental health care, and public health services. IHSC also provides medical case management and oversight for an additional 15,000 detainees housed at approximately 119 non-IHSC staffed detention facilities across the country. In addition, IHSC oversees the financial authorization and payment for off-site specialty and emergency care services for detainees in ICE custody.

IHSC is committed to providing health care services to reduce global disease and support the safe apprehension, enforcement and removal of detained individualsinvolved in immigration proceedings.

Page 22: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

HEALTH CARE TO IMMIGRANTS

“Among the most common complaint from detainees across the country is inadequate access to medical care. Detainees and NGOs have documented severe and widespread problems with access to chronic and emergency medical care, including long delays prior to medically necessary surgical procedures; unresponsiveness to requests for medical care (often termed ‘sick calls’); and dental extraction-only policies.” Patel, S., & Jawetz, T.

Homeland Security Advisory Council.…

health care provided in the private prisons is generally not safe.

Care provided by IHSC is generally much better, though there are some exceptions, e.g. Eloy

patient safety is given little weight – if any – when selecting a detention facility with which to contract

Page 23: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org
Page 24: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

HIGHER STANDARD?

Page 25: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

CONCLUSIONS

The ethical principles upon which our Constitution was written outline the legal reasons for providing appropriate healthcare for inmates and immigrants while in federal custody, not only for their humane treatment but also to ensure the public health of the community to which they are returned

Page 26: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

RECOMMENDATIONS

Use of private, for-profit, contract facilities for inmates and immigrantsReduceOversight of private facilities by the referring department (BOP or ICE)Funding to improve staffing levels and inspection frequency at all facilities

Increase

Use of local gov’t jails for detaineesEliminateAlternatives to detention such as community supervision programs, electronic monitoring, or release on bondAllow

Transparency from departments regarding medical care of inmates and immigrantsRequire

Research with prisoners to assess quality of medical care in prisonEncourage

Page 27: Inmates and Immigrants - azbioethicsnetwork.org · inmates and immigrants federal provision of healthcare mary drago, phd. arizona bioethics network. mdrago@azbioethicsnetwork.org

REFERENCES – AVAILABLE ON OUR WEBSITEFollow-Up Audit of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Efforts to Manage Inmate Health Care. (2010). Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://oig.justice.gov/reports/BOP/a1030.pdfAudit of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Contract with Core Civic, Inc. to Operate the Adams County Correctional Center in Natchez, Mississippi. (2016). Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2016/a1708.pdfReview of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Medical Staffing Challenges (2016). Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2016/e1602.pdfMortality Rates and Life Expectancy of Veterans from 1980 to 2014, and by Education and Income. (2017, April). Washington, DC: National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics.Anno, B. J. (2001). Prison health care: Guidelines for the management of an adequate delivery system: Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Corrections.DHS Advisory Committee. (2016). Report of the DHS Advisory Committee on Family Residential Centers. Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://www.ice.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report/2016/ACFRC-sc-16093.pdfEllis, A. (2008). Health care in the federal prison system. Criminal Justice, 23(2), 43. Esquivel, P. (2017, August 8). 'We don't feel OK here': Detainee deaths, suicide attempts and hunger strikes plague California immigration facility. Los Angeles Times. Homeland Security Advisory Council. (2016, December 1). Report of the Subcommittee on Privatized Immigration Detention Facilities. Retrieved from https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/DHS%20HSAC%20PIDF%20Final%20Report.pdfHuang, E., & Wagner, J. K. (2017). The indefinite "stay" on regulatory reforms for research with prisoners. Am J Bioeth, 17(7), 55-57. doi:10.1080/15265161.2017.1328534Indian Health Service. (2017, April). Indian health disparities IHS Facts Sheets.Kaufmann, G. (2017, October 12). Pregnant immigrants say they’ve been denied medical care in detention centers. The Nation. Retrieved from https://www.thenation.comLong, C., & Meng, G. (2017). Systemic indifference: Dangerous & substandard medical care in US immigration detention. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/05/08/systemic-indifference/dangerous-substandard-medical-care-us-immigration-detentionLopez, V. (2017, August 28). ICEplans to start destroying records of immigrant abuse, including sexual assault and deaths in custody [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/blog/immigrants-rights/ice-and-border-patrol-abuses/ice-plans-start-destroying-records-immigrantLopez, V. (2017, September 26). The federal government is detaining pregnant immigrants in violation of its own policy [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/blog/immigrants-rights/immigrants-rights-and-detention/federal-government-detaining-pregnantMeyersohn, N. (2017, May 19). Justice Department seeks increase in private prison beds. NY, NY: CNN.Motivans, M. (2017, March). Federal Justice Statistics, 2014 - . Statistical Tables. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fjs14st.pdfPatel, S., & Jawetz, T. (2007). Conditions of confinement in immigration detention facilities. Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/other/conditions-confinement-immigrant-detention-facilitiesPhillips, K. (2017, March 5). Thousands of ICE detainees claim they were forced into labor, a violation of anti-slavery laws. Retrieved from http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-immigration-lawuit-ice-detainees-20170305-story.htmlQuednow, C. v. (2017, April 14). Second ICE detainee at Adelanto Detention Center dies in as many weeks. Retrieved from http://ktla.com/2017/04/14/second-ice-detainee-at-adelanto-detention-center-dies-in-as-many-weeks/Takei, C., Small, M., Wu, C., & Chan, J. (2016). Fatal neglect: How ICE ignores deaths in detention. Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/fatal_neglect_acludwnnijc.pdf Wessler, S. F. (2016, December 19/26). Trump's 3 million criminals. The Nation. Retrieved from https://www.thenation.comWessler, S. F. (2016, February 15). Separate, unequal, and deadly: How the US let dozens of immigrants die in segregated, privatized prisons. The Nation. Retrieved from https://www.thenation.comWessler, S. F. (2016, July 4/11). “They knew something was going on" The Nation. Retrieved from https://www.thenation.comWilper, A. P., Woolhandler, S., Boyd, J. W., Karen, E. L., Mccormick, D., Bor, D. H., & Himmelstein, D. U. (2009). The health and health care of US prisoners: Results of a nationwide survey. American Journal of Public Health, 99(4), 666-672. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.144279Zoukis, C. (2013, June). Medical Care in the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Retrieved from http://www.prisonerresource.com/medical-care/medical-care-federal-bureau-prisons/