innovation with integrity klaus schlenga washington, march 25, 2015 bruker response to the fcc...

16
Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Upload: bernadette-ferguson

Post on 27-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

Klaus Schlenga

Washington, March 25, 2015

Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Page 2: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

Outline

Bruker Nb3Sn wire portfolio and production statistics

State of the Art PIT Performance

Comparison of FCC conductor target list to current PIT performance

Interplay filament diameter – Jc – RRR

Requirements and ideas for improved PIT design

Dedicated R&D program

2

Page 3: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

Nb3Sn Conductors at Bruker

Bruker EAS has long time experience in development and manufacturing of Nb3Sn superconductors.

This comprises fabrication of Nb3Sn conductors by different manufacturing routes:

o Internally Stabilized Bronze Route: 1970 - 2000

o Internal Tin Route: 1986 – 1990

o Outer Stabilized Bronze Route: 1980 – today

o Powder In Tube Route: 2004 - today

3

Page 4: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

Production Statistics

Main focus of R&D at Bruker is to achieve highly reliable performance levels of conductors. This can only been reached by robust and controllable industrial fabrication processes.

4

Page 5: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

Production Statistics

Main focus of R&D at Bruker is to achieve highly reliable performance levels of conductors. This can only been reached by robust and controllable industrial fabrication processes.

5

811,0

700

720

740

760

780

800

820

840

860

880

900

0 100 200 300 400 500

jc, fi

l + b

ronz

e /

(A/m

m²)

(tem

p. c

orr.)

01EE…

jc point jc tail Average ± 3σ

Fabrication of ≈ 38 t of Bronze Route Nb3Sn strand for ITER

Variation of total productionjc: average 811 A/mm², 3 σ < 7 %

Page 6: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

Production Statistics

Main focus of R&D at Bruker is to achieve highly reliable performance levels of conductors. This can only been reached by robust and controllable industrial fabrication processes.

6

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

1600

RRR

jc (4

.2 K

, 15

T) /

(A/m

m²)

Billets deliveredjc (4,2 K, 15 T) RRR

Fabrication of PIT192 – Ø = 1.00 mm

Page 7: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

State of Art Performance of PIT Nb3Sn wires - spread

Jc Performance of PIT192 NbTa filaments Ø = 1.00 mmIc, max (4.2 K, 15 T) = 511 A; Cu / non Cu = 1.31, RRR = 177, Bc2* = 26.5 TIc, min (4.2 K, 15 T) = 453 A; Cu / non Cu = 1.33, RRR = 240, Bc2* = 26.4 T

7

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

jc n

on C

u /(

A/m

m²)

B /Tjc -max jc -min

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

j c1/2

* B1/

4[1

03*

A1/2

* m

-1 *

T1/

4 ]

B /T

Kramer -max Kramer -min

Kramer Extrapolation Kramer Extrapolation

Page 8: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

State of Art Performance of PIT Nb3Sn wires - spread

Jc Performance of PIT192 NbTa filaments Ø = 1.00 mmIc, max (4.2 K, 15 T) = 511 A; Cu / non Cu = 1.31, RRR = 177, Bc2* = 26.5 TIc, min (4.2 K, 15 T) = 453 A; Cu / non Cu = 1.33, RRR = 240, Bc2* = 26.4 T

8

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

jc n

on C

u /(

A/m

m²)

B /Tjc -max jc -min

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

j c1/2

* B1/

4[1

03*

A1/2

* m

-1 *

T1/

4 ]

B /T

Kramer -max Kramer -min

Kramer Extrapolation Kramer Extrapolation

after reaction

powder core

reaction front

outer filament contour

Spread in electrical performance is an interplay between jc and RRR. It can partially be explained by different usage of the "real estate" of the filament cross section.

Page 9: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

Target FCC specification for Nb3Sn strand

9

A. Ballarino, L. Bottura , ASC 2014, 3MSPa-06, to be published in IEEE TAS

Continuous reduction (NED-FRESCA2-HL-LHC) of strand diameters in HEP specifications and reduction of filament diameters observed. These reductions impact the feasibility of achieving the electrical targets. The electrical performance data have now shifted to 16 T and magnetization is introduced.

Page 10: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

Comparison of PIT192 Ø = 1. 00 mm strandto target FCC specification

Best performing PIT192Ø = 1.00 mm strand compared to target specification.

o The required increase in jc (including margin!) needs to be achieved having the reduced filament diameters and small strand dimensions as constraints.

o Robustness of strand for cabling is required.

10

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

jc n

on C

u /(

A/m

m²)

B /Tjc -max

1232 A/mm²

Spec. 1500 A/mm²

+ 22 % required

Page 11: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

Reduced filament diameter

Reducing filament diameters means (apart from desired decrease of magnetization):

11

25 30 35 40 45 501600

1800

2000

2200

2400

2600

jc PIT192 12102 jc PIT192 11403 jc PIT192 29995 jc PIT192 33053

jc (

12

T,

4.2

K)

/ (A

/mm

)

Ø filament / µm

610 °C, 80 h + 630 °C, 80 h

25 30 35 40 45 500

100

200

300

400

610 °C, 80 h + 630 °C, 80 h

RRR PIT192 12102 RRR PIT192 11403 RRR PIT192 29995 RRR PIT192 33053

RR

R

Ø filament / µm

Page 12: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

0

50

100

150

200

250

2200 2250 2300 2350 2400 2450 2500

RRR

jc (12 T, 4.2 K) /(A/mm²)

34 µm 29 µm

RRR vs. Jc with small filament diameters

… and will not only be a matter of heat treatment optimization!

12

Variation of heat treatments applied to strands with 34 µm and 29 µm respectively

Page 13: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

Implications for current PIT design

Reduction of strand and/or filament diameters of PIT wires with standard layout will lead to o More deformed filaments, due to grain size effects of the

materials involvedo Reduction of n value due to more inhomogeneous filamentso Reduced reliability of diffusion barrier (unreacted Nb tube)o More probable Sn contamination of the stabilizing Cuo More sensitivity to cabling induced deformation

Ic, n, RRR will suffer from these effects, thus new layouts become mandatory to reduce their impact.

13

Page 14: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

Requirements for future PIT design

Stabilizing Cu needs to be reliably protected Enhancing jc, non Cu by improved usage of the Nb3Sn area of

the filament cross section Enhancing the "quality" of the Nb3Sn by better

understanding/control of the reaction

Extensive R&D and analytical work exclusively dedicated for this application will be required to achieve the targets

Reasonable margin above the specified values needs to be assured for high yield

14

Page 15: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

R&D program for improved Nb3Sn strand

15

FCC will be a unique challenge and opportunity for Nb3Sn strand.

Bruker EST will support this challenge but adequate funding must be secured.

To address FCC needs the strand manufacturer needs to have enough degrees of freedom to play with.

The more stringent the specification is, the less the chance to develop a strand that enables the fabrication of magnets for FCC on justifiable cost

An iterative R&D program with milestones and possible compromises and flexibility regarding performance along the way might be necessary!

Page 16: Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications

Innovation with Integrity

Copyright © 2014 Bruker Corporation. All rights reserved. www.bruker.com