insulin resistance increase the risk of stone formation
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Insulin Resistance Increase the Risk of Stone Formation
1/6 2 0 1 0 T H E A U T H O R S1 5 5 0 J O U R N A L C O M P I L A T I O N 20 10 BJ U IN TE RN AT IO NA L | 10 6, 15 50 1 55 4 | doi:10.1111/j .1464-410X.2010.09216.x
. I I I IOriginal Articles
INSULIN RESISTANCE AND URINARY STONE FORMATION IN METABOLIC SYNDROME
IBA
ET AL.
Insulin resistance increases the risk ofurinary stone formation in a rat model of
metabolic syndrome
Akinori Iba, Yasuo Kohjimoto, Takashi Mori, Tomomi Kuramoto,Satoshi Nishizawa, Reona Fujii, Yoshihito Nanpo, Nagahide Matsumura,Yasuyo Shintani, Takeshi Inagaki and Isao Hara
Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
Accepted for publication 10 November 2009
4 weeks. Ten-week-old male OLETF and LETO
rats were divided into three groups of nineeach and treated with vehicle or oral
administration of 3 or 10 mg/kg/daypioglitazone, an agent that improves insulinresistance. After 4 weeks, body weight andserum and urinary biochemistry were
determined.
RESULTS
The OLETF rats had significantly lower
urinary pH and citrate excretion, and higherurinary uric acid and calcium excretion, than
the LETO rats, with increases in body weight,serum triglyceride, glucose and insulin. Theadministration of pioglitazone to the OLETF
rats for 4 weeks significantly increased
urinary pH dose-dependently. There was no
change in the urinary excretion of citrate,uric acid, calcium, oxalate or magnesium.
CONCLUSION
These results indicate that metabolic
syndrome causes the changes in urinaryconstituents, leading to increased risk ofboth uric acid and calcium stone formation.
Improvement in insulin resistance, a centralcause of metabolic syndrome, might preventuric acid stone formation by raising urinary
pH.
KEYWORDS
urinary stone disease, metabolic syndrome,
insulin resistance, rat, pioglitazone
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the association between
metabolic syndrome and urinary stonedisease, and whether insulin resistanceassociated with adiposity affects the risk ofurinary stone formation, using a rat model of
metabolic syndrome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Four-week-old male Otsuka Long-EvansTokushima Fatty (OLETF, a model of human
type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome)rats, and Long-Evans Tokushima (LETO, a
non-diabetic control) rats (10 each) weregiven a standardized diet and free access towater. Body weight and serum and urinary
biochemistry were determined every
INTRODUCTION
The prevalence of kidney stones has beenincreasing in several countries, in parallel
with the growing epidemics of obesityand type 2 diabetes [14]. In large
epidemiological studies, an increasedprevalence of kidney stones was reportedin patients with obesity [5], type 2 diabetes[6] and hypertension [7]. These medical
conditions are now collectively referred to asmetabolic syndrome, which has receivedmuch attention in recent years as a risk
factor for developing cardiovascular diseases[8]. In the present study, we investigated theassociation between metabolic syndrome and
urinary stone disease, and whether insulinresistance, a central cause of metabolicsyndrome, affects the risk of urinary stone
formation, using a rat model of metabolic
syndrome [9].
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Male Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty(OLETF, a model of human type 2 diabetes andmetabolic syndrome) rats, and Long-EvansTokushima (LETO, a non-diabetic control) rats,
aged 4 weeks, were kindly provided by OtsukaPharmaceuticals, Japan. OLETF rats, whichwere developed from a strain of Long-Evans
rat by selective breeding, are a useful model ofhuman type 2 diabetes and metabolicsyndrome [9]. They spontaneously develop
visceral adiposity and insulin resistance at anearly age and later have hyperglycaemia,hyperlipidaemia and hypertension. Both sets
of rats were maintained according to the
ethical guidelines of our institution, and theCommittee on Animal Investigations of theWakayama Medical University approved the
experimental protocols.
In protocol 1, 4-week-old male OLETF andLETO rats (10 each) were given standardizeddiet and free access to water, and weighedevery 4 weeks. A fasting blood sample was
obtained every 4 weeks for analysis ofglucose, insulin, triglyceride and totalcholesterol. A 24-h urine sample was
collected every 4 weeks to analyse the risk ofstone disease, including pH, calcium, oxalate,citrate, magnesium and uric acid levels.
In protocol 2, 10-week-old male OLETF andLETO rats were divided into three groups of
BJUI
B J U I N T E R N A T I O N A L
-
8/12/2019 Insulin Resistance Increase the Risk of Stone Formation
2/6
I N S U L I N R E S I S T A N C E A N D U R I N A R Y S T O N E F O R M A T I O N I N M E T A B O L I C S Y N D R O M E
2 0 1 0 T H E A U T H O R S
J O U R N A L C O M P I L A T I O N
2 0 1 0 B J U I N T E R N A T I O N A L
1 5 5 1
nine each and treated with vehicle or oral
administration of 3 or 10 mg/kg/daypioglitazone (Takeda Chemical Industry Co.,Japan), an agent that improves insulin
resistance. After 4 weeks, body weight and
serum and urinary biochemistry were
determined.
Serum glucose levels were measured using
the glucose oxidase method, and serum
insulin concentrations by radioimmunoassay
using a double-antibody method, with acommercially available radioimmunoassay kit(Morinaga, Japan). Serum triglyceride and
total cholesterol levels were measured by an
FIG. 1. Time courses of body weight (
A
) and fasting serum levels of triglyceride (
B
), glucose (
C
) and insulin (
D
)
in OLETF (red line) and LETO (blue line) rats (10 each). Values are the mean (
SD
). *
P
-
8/12/2019 Insulin Resistance Increase the Risk of Stone Formation
3/6
I B A E T A L .
2 0 1 0 T H E A U T H O R S
1 5 5 2
J O U R N A L C O M P I L A T I O N
2 0 1 0 B J U I N T E R N A T I O N A L
enzymatic colorimetric method usingcommercially available kits. The homeostasismodel assessment ratio (HOMA-R), an index
of insulin resistance, was calculated as:(fasting immunoreactive insulin level
fasting glucose)/405 [10]. Two successive
24-h urine samples were collected in 50 mLcentrifuge tubes; the first was collected inliquid paraffin and used for the measurement
of pH, calcium, magnesium, and uric acid; thesecond was collected in concentrated HCl andused for the oxalate and citrate measurement
via capillary electrophoresis.
All results are shown as the mean (
SD
); groups
were compared using Students t
-test andDunnetts multiple comparison test; in allstatistical analyses P