insurance consumer protection latest developments at eu level william vidonja, head of single market...
TRANSCRIPT
Insurance consumer protection
Latest developments at EU level
William Vidonja, Head of Single Market & Social Affairs, CEA
Budapest, 19 October 2011
European insurance and reinsurance federation, founded in 1953
Represents around 95% of European insurance market by premium income
Committed to creation of favourable regulatory and supervisory framework for insurers at European and international level
About the CEA
CEA members
32 national associations:
26 EU member states
6 non-EU markets
Croatia, Switzerland, Iceland, Norway,
Turkey, Liechtenstein
2 associate members
Serbia, San Marino
3 partners
Russia, Ukraine, Kosovo
Contribution to the economy
Stakeholders in the international environment
European institutions
International institutions
AMICE
European Commission
European Parliament
Council of Ministers
EIOPA
ESRB
CFO Forum
Insurance industry stakeholders
CRO Forum
PEIF
ICISA
RAB
Other stakeholders
Business EuropeBEUCEFAMA
IAIS
OECD FSB
G-20
National insurance associations
Insurance companies
IMF
IASB
UNI-Europa
EWLAge Platform Europe
SEPASEPA
Tying & bundling
MiFIDE-commerceE-commerce
PRIPs
Age and disability
EU consumer protection initiatives
related to insurance
EU contract law
EU contract law
UCP
Financial educatio
n
Financial educatio
n
Data protection
Data protection
Consumer rights
Consumer rights
IGSIGS IMD
Collective redress
Collective redress
ADRADR
Gender
Anti-discrimination
The need to restore trust (1)
Do you remember... before the crisis?Very high consumer satisfaction and loyalty (2007 IPSOS)
7
The need to restore consumer trust (2)
Do you remember... before the crisis?Very low consumer dissatisfaction (2007 IPSOS)
8
The need to restore consumer trust (3)
Crisis impact Consumers distrust the industry as a whole (German confidence in financial institutions, GfK Marktforschung, 2009, based on 1,013 individuals surveyed)
13% (17%) have complete confidence in insurance companies in general (banks)
40% (60%) trust their own insurer (bank)
Need to rebuild trust in the sector as a whole
9
The need to restore consumer trust (4)
Impact on regulationCall for further consumer protection
(German consumer monitoring, GfK Marktforschung, 2009, based on 700 telephone interviews)
2007: 65% (extreme) satisfaction with existing measures in insurance
2009: 45%
Demand for active improvements in consumer/ investor protection
50% see competent advice as being of primary importance
39% see trust, seriousness and reliability in 2nd (only 11% in 2007)
5% place particular value on returns and profit opportunities
23% want safe investments and less risk Top of the list!
Solutions requested from policy-makers: more rights in case of negligent advice, more financial education in schools, accreditation standards for financial advisors etc.
10
The need to restore consumer trust (5)
Impact on regulation
Regulators have to restore trustin themselvesin financial services and insurance 11
Tying & bundling
MiFIDE-commerceE-commerce
PRIPs
Age and disability
EU consumer protection initiatives
related to insurance
EU contract law
EU contract law
UCP
Financial educatio
n
Financial educatio
n
Data protection
Data protection
Consumer rights
Consumer rights
IGSIGS
SEPASEPA
IMD
Collective redress
Collective redress
ADRADR
Gender
Anti-discrimination
Distribution: IMD (conduct of business) and PRIPs (disclosures)
Q1 2011: EC retail package
Insurance guarantee schemes (IGS)Q4 2012: EC legislative proposal
Anti-discrimination issuesDec 2011: EC guidance on the ECJ Test-Achats ruling (gender)Draft Directive on age & disability pending in the EU Council
Consumer redress: collective redress & alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
End 2011: EC com on principles on collective redress + legislative proposals on ADR/ ODR + recommendation to strengthen FIN-Net
European contract law2012: EC work on an insurance optional instrument
Etc.
EU consumer protection initiatives
related to insurance
Consumer empowerment (1)Information requirements
CEA supports high level of consumer protection and recognises importance of improving information provided to consumers
Information requirements should not create additional burden without providing any benefit to consumers
Not a case of more information, but better information for consumers
CEA has developed a Key Information Checklist (KIC) for unit-linked life insurance A short list of simple, clear information headings on key product
characteristics to help consumers understand and compare products consistently across Europe
Consumer empowerment (2)Conduct of business rules
Enhancing conduct of business rules Important to recognise the diversity of insurance distribution markets across the EU, reflecting differing consumer needs
EU-wide “one-size-fits-all” legislation will not capture differences between existing national distribution structures Minimum harmonisation approach is necessary
CEA has proposed high-level principles on selling practices for all insurance contracts
Aim: to guarantee consumers an appropriate level of protection, regardless of the distribution channel, while accommodating diversityCover fair treatment of the customer, advice, analysis of customer needs etc.Flexible enough to allow a proportionate approach 15
Consumer empowerment (3)Financial education
Importance of financial education to ensure European citizens are equipped with the knowledge,
confidence and skills necessary to improve their understanding of financial products and concepts, and to make informed choices of financial services to suit their particular needs
CEA publication “Financial education and awareness – European insurance industry initiatives”
Overview of industry initiatives across EuropeCalls for European Day of Financial EducationWelcomes work done at international level (OECD, EIOPA)
EC has suspended its activities on financial education:Discontinued Expert Group on Financial EducationDiscontinued European Database for Financial EducationNo longer plans to issue Recommendation on financial education
16
Is there a case for IGS?Policyholders should be protected against the consequences of an insurer going insolventPreference for measures preventing insolvency (Solvency II)
IGS entails side-effects in relation to costs, moral hazard and unfairness, which IGS design options can limit to a certain extent but not eliminate
Open question about IGS effectiveness:
Real or fake consumer protection tool?The risk in concentrated marketsThe risk in non-concentrated markets
17
Insurance guarantee schemes (IGS)
Gender in insurance pricing (1)
Gender Directive 2004/113/EC Prohibition of gender-based differentiation in insurance pricing (Art.5§1)MS option allowing such differentiation (Art.5§2)
ECJ Test-Achats ruling, 1 March 2011Art.5§2 invalid with effect from 21 Dec 2012The ruling addresses the structure of the Gender Directive, but leads to challenge the way private insurance works
Implications for insurersTechnical challenge for insurers to adapt (deadline)Legal certainty needed asap
EC guidelines expected in Dec 2011Ruling only applies to new contracts concluded for the 1st time after 21 Dec 2012
General implications for consumersReduced competition, innovation and consumer choiceRisk inadequate pricing: risk of premium increase, withdrawal of products (adverse selection and moral hazard)
Gender in insurance pricing (2)
General examples of consequences for consumers
Term life insurance– Women live longer than men & pay less– Expected premium increase eg for a single young mother
looking for a term life insurance to secure her mortgage
Motor insurance– (Young) women have less driving offences and claims, and
therefore pay lower premiums – Unisex premiums may result in higher premiums for them
Annuities– Men may stop buying annuities and prefer banking/investment
products with no biometric risk coverage– Expected social impact on levels of retirement savings in the
context of financial pressure on state pension schemes
Gender in insurance pricing (3)
National examplesBelgium
Motor third party liability (MTPL) insurance: the introduction of unisex rates resulted in 2008 in premium reductions of 3–4% for young men and premium increases of 7–15% for young women
The UKMotor insurance: women aged 25 and under could see the cost of cover rise by up to 25%; men of same age costs could fall by up to 10% (based on an average motor premium of £1,682 for female aged 17-22 (AA Premium Index), it would mean an extra £420 a year)Annuities: men (and dependants) could see a 8% reduction in benefits, while those for women could only rise by 6%Term life insurance: expected rise of up to 35-50% in the cost of cover for women, while men could see a fall of 0-10%
Gender in insurance pricing (4)
Age and disability in insurance pricing
Draft Directive on age & disability
Risk of spill-over effect
Similar structure as Gender Directive
Need for absolute legal certainty on use of age and disability in
risk assessment and insurance pricing
A ban on the use of these factors would lead to the end of the
current insurance business model, to the detriment of
consumers…
Conclusions
Good intentions behind EU initiatives, but must strive for effective and intelligent consumer protection and consider the wider implications
Enhance level of consumer protection, rather than introduce more regulation - quality vs. quantity
Important to respect the diversity of markets and the differing demands and needs of consumers across the EU
Competition allows for increased choice, lower prices and better access to insurance
Proposals need to avoid “unintended consequences” for the economy, businesses, consumers and taxpayers
Professional, precise and evidence-based IA, testing and consultation
CEA publications
CEA Annual Report
The use of gender in insurance pricing
Financial education and awareness:
European insurance industry initiatives
European Insurance in Figures
Briefing note: Insurance distribution
Insurance Distribution Channels in Europe
For more information www.cea.eu
CEA aisblSquare de Meeûs 29B-1000 Brussels