insurance contracts for 831(b) enterprise risk captives – policies and pooling agreements jeffrey...

42
Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris & Mammarella, P.A. Captive Planning Associates, LLC Bartlett Actuarial Group, Ltd. Director President & CEO Managing Principal Phone: (302) 652-2900 Phone: (888) 305-8889 Phone: (843) 377-0993 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:15 a.m.

Upload: anthony-norman

Post on 25-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements

Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian JohnsonGordon, Fournaris & Mammarella, P.A. Captive Planning Associates, LLC Bartlett Actuarial Group, Ltd.

Director President & CEO Managing Principal

Phone: (302) 652-2900 Phone: (888) 305-8889 Phone: (843) 377-0993

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:15 a.m.

Page 2: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Introduction

What will we discuss and why?

2

Page 3: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Overview

Evolution of Enterprise Risk-Coverages

-Pricing

Policy Agreements

Pooling Arrangements

3

Page 4: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

ENTERPRISE ENTERPRISE

RISKRISK

4

Page 5: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

What is Enterprise Risk Management?Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) enables management to effectively deal with uncertainty and associated risk and opportunity, enhancing the capacity to build value.

Value is maximized when management sets strategy to strike an optimal balance between growth and return goals and related risks, and efficiently and effectively deploys resources in pursuit of the entity’s objectives. According to the Casualty Actuarial Society (“CAS”), ERM is defined as:

“The process by which organizations in all industries assess, control, exploit, finance and monitor risks from all sources for the purposes of increasing the organization’s short and long term value to its stakeholders.”

All entities face uncertainty. The challenge for management is to determine how much uncertainty to accept. Uncertainty presents both risk and opportunity, with the potential to erode or enhance value.

5

Page 6: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Enterprise Risk ManagementFurthermore, CAS has enumerated the types of risk subject to ERM as Hazard, Financial, Operational and Strategic.Hazard risks – are those risks that have traditionally been addressed by insurers, including fire, theft, tornado, earthquake, windstorm, general liability, business interruption, pollution and health.Financial risks – cover potential losses due to changes in financial markets, including interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, liquidity risks and credit risk.Operational risks – cover a wide variety of situations, including customer satisfaction, product development, product failure, trademark/copyright protection, corporate leadership, information technology, management fraud and information risk. Strategic risks – include such factors as completion, customer preferences, technological innovation and regulatory or political impediments.

6

Page 7: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Enterprise Risk ManagementERM helps management ensure effective reporting and compliance with laws and regulations, and helps avoid damage to the entity’s reputation and associated consequences. The following capabilities inherent in ERM help management achieve the entity’s performance and profitability targets and prevent loss of resources:

•Aligning risk appetite and strategy – Management considers the entity’s risk appetite in evaluating strategic alternatives, setting related objectives, and developing mechanisms to manage related risks.

•Enhancing risk response decisions – ERM provides the objectivity to identify and select among alternative risk responses from; risk avoidance, reduction, sharing and acceptance.

•Reducing operational surprises and losses – Entities gain enhanced capability to identify potential events and establish responses, reducing surprises and associated costs or losses.

•Identifying and managing multiple and cross-enterprise risks – Every enterprise faces a myriad of risks affecting different parts of the organization, and ERM facilitates effective response to the interrelated impacts, and integrated responses to multiple risks.

•Seizing opportunities – By considering a full range of potential events, management is positioned to identify and proactively realize opportunities.

•Improving deployment of capital – Obtaining thorough risk information allows management to effectively assess overall capital needs and enhance capital allocation

In summary, ERM helps management get to where it wants to go and avoid pitfalls and surprises along the way. 7

Page 8: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Current Trends in ART• Property Risks:

Wind Flood Earthquake

• Cyber Risk

• Environmental / Pollution

• Workers’ Compensation

• Reputational / Brand Risk

• Representations & Warranties

• Supply Chain Interruption

• Intellectual Property

• Pandemic Risk

• Employee Benefits

Coverage Considerations

•Gain immediate control over a substantial business expense, which is designed to increase exponentially, with access to the reinsurance market

• Ability to segregate funds and build surplus to stabilize annual cost incurred

•Create a new corporate profit center and increase rate of return

•Establish and benefit from “best practice” risk management procedures

•Reduce current business costs over a predictable term of years and avoid artificial market adjustments

•Create flexible claims payment structure

•Provides coverage for uninsured or hard-to-insure risks

•Create an insurance infrastructure that provides flexibility for unknown market changes (whether politically or financially mandated)

•Potential to build up underwriting profits of the captive exempt from federal income tax – when premiums are less than $1.2 million

8

Page 9: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Enterprise Risk ManagementRisk Evaluation and Transfer

Understand the organizations’ risk exposures

Know the organizations’ risk tolerance

Be aware of loss history

Know the insurance marketplace

Understand the organizations’ risk requirements and how they may change, and

Determine the organizations’ corporate risk limits and expectations

9

Page 10: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Risk Management and UnderwritingReducing the Net Cost of Risk

•Almost any form of self-insurance can be less expensive than risk transferred to the commercial marketplace (due to adverse selection to support external losses)

•Carefully analyze risk exposure (strategic underwriting)

•Transfer unacceptable levels of risk to others (commercial insurers, reinsurers)

•Best-in-class claims administration

•Proactive risk mitigation program (employee education/training)

•Expert captive management

10

Page 11: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

PRICINGPRICING

11

Page 12: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

POLICY POLICY

AGREEMENTSAGREEMENTS

12

Page 13: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Advantages & Benefits to ControlControl over policy drafting and administration

is one of the key advantages of a captive

Opportunity to tailor coverage to insured’s unique exposures Address specific gaps in insured’s commercial insurance program Flexibility in interpreting policy provisions Ability to endorse after the fact to confirm intentions

13

Page 14: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Administrative/Practical Concerns

Captive plays a dual role – insurer of related party risks and reinsurer of pooled, unrelated party risks Customized and / or diverse policies create uncertainty for the insurer Also less efficient for the captive manager to administer claims, since every policy can have different definitions / claim triggers / methods of valuation / exclusions

14

Page 15: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Administrative/Practical Concerns

Presence of unrelated exposures can lead to tensions between captives in the pool• Captives may not want their manager to interpret policies

liberally• Because pooling arrangements can put as much as 75% of

a claim into the pool, an insured has an incentive to aggressively contest a denied claim.

15

Page 16: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Administrative/Practical Concerns

There are also external pressures from the desire to have the captive be treated as an insurance company for tax purposes.• Case law emphasizes the need for reasonable pricing that

is actuarially determined• This necessarily requires some level of coordination

between policy terms and premium pricing analysis• Vague policy language could arguably expand coverage

beyond what the actuary contemplated, perhaps even into business risks, as opposed to insurable risks

16

Page 17: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Goals of Policy Drafting

Establish and meet the expectations of the insured with respect to scope of coverage, the responsibilities of the insurer and insured. Coordinate with feasibility study and business planPrevent claim disputes

17

Page 18: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Policy Forms, Limits, and Exclusions

Master Policy” vs. Individual policies• Master policy can be unwieldy• Difficult to make master policy internally coherent

18

Page 19: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Policy Forms, Limits, and Exclusions

Claims made or occurrence based?• The term “Claims made” is ubiquitous – not always

applicable

• What event creates liability for the insurer: – The event itself?– A Claim against the insured from an injured third-

party?– Loss (e.g. expense) actually incurred by the

insured?

19

Page 20: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Policy Forms, Limits, and Exclusions

Policy Limits

• Do you permit or prohibit stacking (e.g. an occurrence triggers liability under multiple captive policies)?

20

Page 21: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Policy Forms, Limits, and Exclusions

Policy Exclusions:

• Making sure that the exclusions are applicable to the types of coverage

• Balance between providing DIC coverage and permitting policy to cover moral hazards, uninsurable risks

21

Page 22: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Adjudication of Claims

Exhaustion of Liability for the Insurer

• Must the bad act or property damage occur during the policy period or can it occur prior?

22

Page 23: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

23

Page 24: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

24

Page 25: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Adjudication of Claims

Valuation of Claims

• How are business interruption losses calculated?• Projection income that “would have been earned” but for

the event• Meaningful comparison of pre-loss and post-loss

experience• Valuing the loss of a contract or a key employee

25

Page 26: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

POOLINGPOOLING

ARRANGEMENTSARRANGEMENTS

26

Page 27: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Key FeaturesLayer vs. First Dollar

Layer:• Protects Against Abusive & Nuisance Claims• Participants Feel Less Vulnerable• Very Few Shared Claims

First Dollar:• Every Claim is Shared• Increases Loss Frequency• Easier to Defend?

Struggle for Balance 27

Page 28: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Key FeaturesFront or Reinsurance

Pool as Direct Writer:• Facilitates High Volume Programs• Easier to Standardize and Issue Policies

• Beware of Multi-State Issues

Pool as Reinsurer:• Easier for Pool (Simple Reinsurance)• May Add a Transaction (Reinsurance and Retrocession)

28

Page 29: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Key FeaturesEntity or Contract

Entity:• Direct regulation and frictional costs• May give participants more comfort• May be necessary if pool intends to retain risk

Contract:• Ease of entry and documentation• Can reduce administrative expenses• Who holds the money?• How do you pay claims?

29

Page 30: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Key FeaturesTerm – Retrospective or Prospective

Several Pool Philosophies:• Fixed start date for current year• Rolling admission• Fixed future start date

Retrospective:– Mid or late year entry can force retrospective policy

issuance– Might not be insurance

30

Page 31: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Key FeaturesPremium Allocation

Consider how much premium is being pooled (typically in %):• Safe Harbor• Greater than 50%• But what if your quota share of pool includes your own

risk?

31

Page 32: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Key FeaturesPremium Allocation

Consider how the % is determined:• Often arbitrary or little actuarial support for

reasonableness• Easier to get comfortable in first dollar?• More difficult in layered or hybrid designs

32

Page 33: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Key FeaturesMaximum Exposure (Stop Loss)

Always get asked:• Some pools have stop loss provisions• Some pools buy stop loss coverage• Some pools ignore or don’t think they need stop loss

May be important in open pools or pools with high limit exposuresCarefully circumscribed pools may not need itParticipant program or policy aggregates can operate as a virtual stop loss provision

33

Page 34: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Key FeaturesCollateral

Natural Tension:• Captive owner wants his money in the captive• Pool needs to know the funds are available to pay claims

Common Methods:• Funds withheld• Pledged account• Controlled operating account or other set aside

•Can be very messy if pool must collect from each participant to pay claims 34

Page 35: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Practical ConsiderationsOpen or Closed

Open:• Can increase participants quickly• Broad diversity (risk, industry, geography)• Helpful in extraordinary situations

Closed:• More certainty regarding risks and vetting of participants• Enough participants?• Easier in and out

35

Page 36: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Practical ConsiderationsClaims

Magnitude and Frequency:• Pool’s history?• “Never had a claim!”• How much is enough?

Management:• Who adjusts claims and how?• What if there is a committee of participants?• Written record important

36

Page 37: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Practical ConsiderationsTransparency

How much do you need or want?• All participants known to one another?• All claims and claimants identified?

Should it work like a member-owned group?

37

Page 38: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Practical ConsiderationsStandardization – Underwriting/Rating

Several different pool underwriting approaches?• All participants must be underwritten through pool’s

program• Pool must review and approve underwriting• Pool doesn’t consider underwriting

38

Page 39: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Practical ConsiderationsStandardization – Underwriting/Rating

Does it matter for participant:• Subjectivity in rates• Not reviewing at all could be too laissez-faire?• Otherwise, maybe more about confidence of the pool

provider

39

Page 40: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Practical ConsiderationsStandardization – Coverages

Coverage selections may be more important than rating method because:• Affect frequency and severity• Different appetites for different exposures• First party vs third party control

Homogeneity:• What does it mean?• Is it required?

40

Page 41: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

Practical ConsiderationsReaction to Experience

The most important factor of all?How do you act like an insurance company?• What happens at renewal time?• Is there annual re-rating of underlying coverage?• Is there annual re-consideration of reasonableness of

premium allocation?

41

Page 42: Insurance Contracts for 831(b) Enterprise Risk Captives – Policies and Pooling Agreements Jeffrey K. Simpson John R. Capasso Brian Johnson Gordon, Fournaris

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERSQUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

42