integrated mass media campaigns: the australian experience judith watt head of smokefree london...
TRANSCRIPT
Integrated mass media campaigns: the Australian
experience
Judith WattHead of SmokeFree London programme
Former member, Ministerial Tobacco Advisory Group, Australia
Tobacco Control – Lessons and Experiences
Kells, Northern Ireland, March 2001
Rise and fall in tobacco controlexpenditure - adults
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1982/3 1983/4 1984/5 1985/6 1986/7 1987/8 1988/9 1989/90 1990/1 1991/2 1992/3 1993/4 1994/5 1995/6
Year
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Adult anti-smoking expenditureSmoking prevalence total
Costsperadult
%smoking
Ministerial Tobacco Advisory Group
Chaired by an acknowledged expert
Included government and non-government
people
Small (five members)
Had direct access to the Minister (if needed)
Ministerial Tobacco Advisory Group
National Tobacco Campaign National Tobacco Strategy Best practice model for sales to minors
Research to inform nicotine regulation
Review of the national Quitline service
Development of national response to ETS
Review of health warnings
Negotiations with tobacco industry ondisclosure of ingredients
Focus on adult cessation
Impact on tobacco-related disease
Credibility for teen-directed interventions
Prospects of success good
Why?
Before the campaign started
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
18-29 30-40 41-59 60+Age
%
Ex-smoker
Smoker
Age group by smoker/ex-smoker
NTC Evaluation data
Before the campaign started
0
10
20
30
40
Lower bluecollar
Upper bluecollar
Lower whitecollar
Upper whitecollar
%
Smokers by occupational group
NTC Evaluation data
“We should not be frightened of using fear in our efforts to induce change in health-related attitudes and behaviours.
Arousing fear is unlikely to be counter-productive or to produce ‘boomerang’ effects, particularly if the message … provides clear advice on what to do (and the benefits).”
Sutton, Shock Tactics and the Myth of the Inverted U.Brit. J. Addiction (1992)
Does fear arousal work?
Communication brief (1)
The personal agenda Today Tomorrow Some time soon When I get around to it
Intention action Today’s personal agenda
Actions that occur over time need resources and reinforcements
Communication brief (2)
gain fresh insights on the recommended behaviour
reassess the importance of the behaviour
reassess the urgency of carrying out the behaviour
reassess the personal relevance of the behaviour
have confidence in their own ability to carry out the behaviour (self-efficacy)
remember or be reminded to do it
for long-term change, gain more than is lost by carrying out the behaviour (response efficacy)
To potentiate intention, stimulate individuals to:
Smoker’s translation
"Smoking is like buying a ticket in a lottery that’s drawn when you’re 70 … I’ll chance that.”
Appointing the agency
Agencies invited to a credentials pitch
not a concept pitch
Five agencies invited to pitch
Four turned up with concepts anyway
We appointed the one which didn’t
Expert briefings
Evening briefings with medical and scientific experts
Visits to pathology labs and hospital wards
Responding to their many requests for information and explanation
Structure of advertisements
1. Empathy device
2. Conditioning device
3. New news
4. Certain effects
1. Empathy device
2. Conditioning device
3. New news
4. Certain effects
“The people behind this ad understand me”
Conditions association between act of smoking and images of damage
“This affects me and I did not know it”“I can’t bear to think I’m doing that to myself”
“These are immediate and certain effects of smoking, not just a chance I take”
Stimulus element Stimulus element Smoker response Smoker response
Evaluation Measures
Implementation monitor Media monitor (paid, unpaid) Price monitor Quitline calls Tracking survey Pre - post surveys
Prevalence Consumption
Media buy: May 1997 - Dec 1998
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
New Year PR activity
WNTD 31 May
Brain & Call for help launched 22 April
Artery & Lung launched 12 June
Tumourlaunched 16 July
Ma
y 9
7
Fe
b 9
8
De
c 9
8
Media buy vs Quitline calls
0
50
1 00
1 50
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
0
1 000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
1 0000
TARPs
CALLS
TA
RP
s Call sNew Year
PR activity
Tumour launched 16 July
Artery & Lung launched 12 June
WNTD 31 May
Brain & Call for help launched 22 April
Ma
y 9
7
Fe
b 9
8
De
c 9
8
Main findings after 6 months
More people thinking about quitting• Thought about quitting at least daily -
up 18% from baseline
More people trying to quit• Tried to quit in past 2 weeks -
up 100% from baseline (3% to 6%)
More people had quit• Quit in past year -
up 37% from baseline (8.3% to 11.4%)
Fewer people were smoking• Smoking prevalence: Benchmark = 23.5%
Nov 1997 = 22.1%
Positive shiftthrough stages of change
1515
1313
88
-10-10
Baseline
%increase
%decrease
Pre-contemplation
Contemplation
Preparation
Pre-contemplationContemplationPreparation
(Not considering quitting in next 6 months:(Considering quitting in next 6 months:(Planning to quit in next 30 days:
48% at baseline)36% at baseline)16% at baseline)
Main findings after 18 months
Behaviouralresponses tothe campaign
Bench-mark
Follow-up 1
Follow-up 2
Rang the Quitline 2% 4% 5%
Used nicotine gumor patches
7% 10% 15%
Read ‘how to quit’literature
16% 16% 24%
What might have confounded results?
Pricing of cigarettes
“There is no evidence that discounting became more prevalent or more extensive over the period of the campaign …”
Scollo M, Owen T, Boulter JNTC Evaluation, 2000
Did the campaign affect young people?
96% of smokers and recent quitters were aware of the campaign.
85% of smokers and recent quitters found the campaign relevant to them.
49% reported new learning about the health effects of smoking cigarettes.
67% said the campaign made them more likely to quit smoking.
Did the campaign affect young people?
A majority of teenage recent quitters (68%) said it helped them to stay quit.
A majority of teenage non-smokers (86%) said it helped them remain non-smokers.
An average of 8 out of 10 teenagers felt that the campaign did not increase the appeal of smoking for teenagers – it made smoking seem less cool and desirable.
What happened to smoking prevalence?
By end of 1998 it had reduced by around
1.8% from baseline
Enumeratedhousehold
sampleInformant
sample
Benchmark 23.5% 23.7%
Follow-up 1 22.1% 22.0%
Follow-up 2 21.8% 21.8%
Economic evaluationa
Based on measured prevalence reduction: 920 premature deaths averted 3,358 additional years of life to age 75
£9.6m in health care cost offsetsb
£19 per quitterb
£3,913 per premature death avertedb
£1,574 per year of life “saved”
b
a Carter and Scollo, 2000b Approx £3.6m was spent on the campaign
International use of campaign
TV campaign used in New Zealand, Massachusetts, Singapore and Poland
Smokers changed in Singapore to Chinese and Malay people in local settings
Canadian health warnings used images from Australian campaign