international journal of scientific & engineering research ......the recent time the design...
TRANSCRIPT
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 4, Issue3, March-2013 1 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org
Optimization of High Voltage Arc Assist Interrupters
Himanshu Joshi, Anjani Pandharkar, Ghanashyam Patil
Abstract -- The circuit breaker is one of the most important unit in the electrical power system. The protection, stability and continuity of the
system depend on the circuit breaker's ability to switch line, load and exciting currents and to interrupt fault currents. High voltage circuit
breakers, have to operate with extremely high reliability in the power system to ensure the economical and reliable power distribution. It is
observed over the years that most of the failures in circuit breakers are of mechanical nature. Consequently the development efforts over
the last decade has been focused towards thedevelopment of high efficiency interrupters which requires low energy mechanism. The first step
towards the high efficiency interrupter is the development of Arc Assist Interrupters. In the conventional Puffer type interrupters of a high
voltage SF6 circuit breakers, a considerable amount of mechanical energy is used to compress the gas in order to create a gas flow to remove
the arc energy. In arc assist Interrupters, arc energy is used to increase the gas pressure required for interruption. This paper discusses the
results of detailed flow field and electric field computations. Effect of nozzle shape and thermal chamber volume on the pressure rise is ex-
plained. Also capacitive current interrupting performance is estimated based on electric field and gas flow analysis. This paper helps to con-
clude simulation study using ga flow calculation program which is very useful to understand the mechanism of pressure generation, and it is
also very useful to find the data of the optimum design of the interrupter.
Index Terms— Arc Assist Interrupters, Thermal Puffer, Nozzle, Gas Circuit Breaker (GCB), Capacitive Current Switching, Gas
Density, Electrostatic Stress, Breakdown Voltage (BDV)
—————————— ——————————
1 INTRODUCTION The development of SF6 gas circuit breaker started around 1950's,
since then it has undergone many technological changes. Several
types of SF6 circuit breakers have been developed by various manu-
facturers in the world during last twenty years, for rated voltages
from 6.6kV to 1100kV. During every development phase the aim was
to design a new compact, highly reliable and low energy circuit
breaker. Figure 1 shows the cross section of typical puffer type gas
circuit breaker. When breaker is fully closed, the pressure in the
puffer cylinder is equal to that outside the cylinder. During opening
stroke puffer-cylinder and moving contact tube start moving against
the fixed piston, and there is relative movement, as a result gas gets
compresses in the cavity between puffer cylinder and piston. After
certain travel contact separates and arc is drawn between the arcing
contacts. During the arcing period, compressed SF6 gas is blown
axially along the arc through a convergent divergent nozzle. As a
result the arc gets extinguished. The above principle utilizes mechan-
ical energy to compress the gas required for quenching the arc.
The development of SF6 gas circuit breaker started around 1950's,
since then it has undergone many technological changes. Several
types of SF6 circuit breakers have been developed by various manu-
facturers in the world during last twenty years, for rated voltages
from 6.6kV to 1100kV. During every development phase the aim
was to design a new compact, highly reliable and low energy circuit
breaker. Figure 1 shows the cross section of typical puffer type gas
circuit breaker. When breaker is fully closed, the pressure in the
puffer cylinder is equal to that outside the cylinder. During opening
stroke puffer-cylinder and moving contact tube start moving against
the fixed piston, and there is relative movement, as a result gas gets
compresses in the cavity between puffer cylinder and piston. After
certain travel contact separates and arc is drawn between the arcing
Himanshu Joshi is currently pursuing masters degree program in electric power systems in Pune University, India. He is working with Crompton Greaves Limited since 2002. He is having an experience in the field of Type Testing of Gas Circuit Breakers, Dielectric Design and Gas Flow Design of Interrupters PH-+919881707734. E-mail: [email protected]
Anjani Pandharkar and Ghanashyam Patil is currently pursuing masters degree program in electric power systems in Pune University, India. Both have them have an experience with R & D-Gas circuit Breakers with Crompton Greaves Limited, Nasik E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected]
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 4, Issue3, March-2013 2 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org
contacts. During the arcing period, compressed SF6 gas is blown
axially along the arc through a convergent divergent nozzle. As a
result the arc gets extinguished. The above principle utilizes mechan-
ical energy to compress the gas required for quenching the arc.
Figure 1 Puffer Type Interrupter
The recent time the design efforts has been shifted to develop the arc
assist type gas circuit breakers. wherein the arc energy is used to
increase the gas pressure required for quenching the arc. But during
the low current interruption the arc energy is not sufficient to in-
crease the gas pressure, an additional gas flow required by the me-
chanical compression. Figure 2 shows the typical cross section of arc
assist interrupter.
Figure 2 Arc Assist Interrupter One of the major limitations of the arc assist interrupters is that the
higher gas pressure is associated with higher gas temperature, which
reduces the dynamic voltage withstand capability between contact
space. Also breaking of low currents wherein arc energy is not suffi-
cient is a major challenge to the designers. There are many parame-
ters which influence interrupting performance such as volume ratio
of two chambers, nozzle structure, breaking current, moving speed
etc. Therefore design work is very complicated and development of
this type of GCB need very long time. But optimization is possible
through the detailed computations of flow field and the electric field
distribution in various phases of interrupting process and under dif-
ferent stress conditions.
2 THE FLOW SOLVER The Kernel of the solver is based on the solution of the unsteady
Euler equations of gas dynamics. The solver computes the solution
by integration of the Euler equations on a moving and deforming
unstructured triangular grid using a finite volume method. Two
modes of operation of the circuit breaker can be simulated viz. Cold
mode and Arc mode. In Cold mode, simulation of operation of cir-
cuit breaker is done without electric arc. This allows the simulation
of the transient flow field occurring during the operation. In addition,
a solution of electric field can be obtained inside the chamber, allow-
ing the computation of the ratio (E/N) which governs the dielectric
strength of the chamber. The emporal variation of the dielectric
strength which depends on both the inter electrode spacing and the
fluid density distribution resulting from the flow can thus be ob-
tained. In the Arc mode i.e analysis with the real current, an arc
model is added to the Cold mode which includes the computation of
Ohmic heating, the Lorentz forces and the radiation transfer. Nozzle
ablation can also be simulated based on the incident radiative flux.
[5], [8]
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Many computer simulations done to see the effect of various parame-
ter on the pressure rise in thermal chamber. Figure 3 below shows
gas pressure in thermal and compression chamber during current
interruption. The pressure in the thermal chamber increases by tem-
perature rise of gas and the temperature increase occurs by a hot gas
flow from arcing zone. [2]
Figure 3 Pressure rise during current interruption Firstly the effect of current magnitude is analyzed Figure 4 shows the
influence of magnitude of interrupting current on the pressure rise in
thermal chamber. The interrupting current varied from 0.5 kA to 40
kA. The result shows that pressure in thermal chamber increases with
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 4, Issue3, March-2013 3 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org
increasing interrupting current.
Figure 4 Effect of interrupting current on pressure rise in
thermal chamber
Figure 5 shows the influence of arcing time on the pressure rise in
thermal chamber. The arcing time is varied from 10ms to 22ms. The
result shows that pressure rise in thermal chamber changes by arcing
time.
Figure 5 Effect of arcing time on pressure rise inthermal
chamber
Figure 6 shows the influence of nozzle throat length on the pressure
rise in thermal chamber. Three different throat lengths are considered
for analysis viz. 1pu =10mm, 2pu=20mm and 3pu=30mm. The result
clearly shows that long throat nozzle increases the pressure in the
thermal chamber considerably. [3]
Figure 6 Effect of nozzle throat length on pressure rise in thermal
chamber
Figure 7 shows the influence of nozzle throat diameter on the pres-
sure rise in thermal chamber. Three different throat diameters are
considered for analysis viz. 1pu, 2pu and 3pu. The result shows that
smaller the throat diameter higher the pressure rise in the thermal
chamber. [3]
Figure 7 Effect of nozzle throat diameter on pressure rise in thermal
chamber
Figure 8 shows the influence of volumes of thermal and compression
chamber on pressure rise in thermal chamber. Three cases are ana-
lyzed here, wherein the volume ratios of thermal to compression
chamber are considered as 1:1, 1:0.5 and 0.5:1. The result shows that
the effect of volume of thermal chamber is bigger than that of the
compression chamber. [1]
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 4, Issue3, March-2013 4 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org
Figure 8 Effect of thermal and compression chamber volume
on pressure rise in thermal chamber
4 CAPACITIVE CURRENT SWITCHING
Many researches have shown that the dielectric withstand voltage
calculated by electric field and static gas pressure is not so accurate
because of the formation of shock wave at the tip of arcing contact.
The tip of the fixed arcing contact is investigated to get the dielectric
recovery strength, as the maximum electric field strength and varia-
tion in the gas density occurs due to the formation of shock waves.
Here four points are considered on the tip of arcing contact. Figure 9
shows the points of calculation.
Figure 9 Points of calculation on arcing contact tip
Gas flow analysis and electrostatic analysis is carried out during
opening operation of breaker. Figure 10 and 11 shows the electrostat-
ic stress and gas density variation on four points.
Figure 10 Electric stress on arcing contact tip
Figure 11 Gas density variation on arcing contact tip
Finally the dynamic BDV is calculated for all four points based on
the streamer criterion. Figure 12 shows the dynamic BDV and ap-
plied voltage Vs time. From BDV curve, it is clear that in dynamic
condition max BDV always shifts on tip of arcing contact.
Figure 12 Transient BDV on arcing contact tip Hence this method is more accurate to evaluate the capacitive
switching performance. [4], [6], [7]
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 4, Issue3, March-2013 5 ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER © 2013 http://www.ijser.org
5 CONCLUSION
- Simulation study using calculation program is very useful to
understand the mechanism of pressure generation, and it is also
very useful to find the data of the optimum design.
- The nozzle throat diameter and the length of nozzle throat in-
fluence the pressure rise in the thermal chamber considerably.
The influence is as large as the influence of interrupting current.
- The thermal effect of pressure rise in the thermal chamber is
big in relatively earlier interrupting phase.
- The volume of the thermal chamber influences the pressure
rise in the thermal chamber very much. The gas in the smaller
thermal chamber is easily heated by the back flow of hot gas,
and higher temperature in thermal chamber increases the pres-
sure there.
- The volume of compression chamber influences the pressure in
the thermal chamber also. The larger volume increases the pres-
sure in compression chamber, and it influences the pressure in
thermal chamber at the longer arcing time.
- To improve the dielectric performance of circuit breaker, it is
effective to reduce the maximum electric field strength and the
formation of the shock wave near the arcing contact.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors wish to thank Crompton Greaves Limited for providing continual guidance to work on Gas Flow Design of Arc-Assist Interrupters.
REFERENCES [1] N. Osawa et al. “Influence of puffer volume And operating force
on puffer pressure built up in thermal puffer type gas circuit
breaker taking nozzle ablation into account”. IEEE Trans. Power
Delivery, 2002.
[2] Jan Sedlacek et al. “Optimization of high Voltage self blast inter
rupters by gas flow and electric field computations”. IEEE
Trans. Power Delivery, Oct 2003.
[3] J-C Lee et al. “Effects of nozzle shape on the interruption per
formance of thermal puffer type gas circuit breakers”. Elsevier
Vacuum 80 (2006) 599- 603.
[4] F.Endo et al. “Analytical prediction of Transient breakdown
characteristics of SF6 gas circuit breakers”. IEEE Trans. Power
Delivery, 4(3):1731-1737, 1989.
[5] J.Y.Trepanier, M.Reggio, et al, “Analysis of The Dielectric
strength of an SF6 circuit breaker”, IEEE Trans. Power Delivery,
Vol.6, No 2, Apr 1991.
[6] A. Pedersen, “Criteria for Spark Breakdown in Sulfur Hexafluo
ride”, IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-89(8),
pp.2043~2048, Nov. 1970.
[7] H.K.Kim et al. “Optimal Design of Gas Circuit Breaker for In
creasing the Small Current Interruption Capacity”. IEEE Trans.
On Magnetics, Vol. 39, No.3, May 2003.
[8] Lin Xin, Li Junmin, et al. “Numerical Calculation of Interrup
tion properties of the Self Extinguishing type SF6 circuit breaker
During Small Current Interruption”. IEEE Trans. On Magnetics,
Vol. 37, No.5, Sept 2001.
BIOGRAPHY
[1]
Himanshu Joshi was born in 1978 in India. He received the
Bachelor degree in Electrical Engineering from Pune University
in 2002. Currently he is doing Masters Degree in Power Systems
from Pune University.
Currently, he is working with Crompton Greaves Limited,
Nashik, India. Engaged in R & D works on Gas Circuit Breakers.
Actively involved in development of SF6 Gas Circuit Breakers
and Type Testing of SF6 Gas Circuit Breakers.
Research Interest is in Dielectric Design of High Voltage Gas
Circuit Breakers, Gas Flow Analysis.
Authored 2 Technical Research Papers in Different
National and International Conference. He has contributed for
Filing 9 Patents and 2 Design Registrations.