international telecommunication union internet challenges & ip telephony connect 2001 cancun,...
DESCRIPTION
International Telecommunication Union Inter-regional Internet backbone 357 Mbit/s 19’716 Mbit/s Asia- Pacific Latin America & Caribbean 2’638 Mbit/s 127 Mbit/s Arab States, Africa 468 Mbit/s 171 Mbit/s Europe 56’241 Mbit/s USA & Canada Source: TeleGeography Inc., Global Backbone Database. Data valid for SeptTRANSCRIPT
International Telecommunication Union
Internet Challenges &IP Telephony
Connect 2001Cancun, October 16-18, 2001
Robert Shaw<[email protected]>
ITU Internet Strategy and Policy AdvisorInternational Telecommunication Union
The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of the ITU or its membership.
International Telecommunication Union
13
291396
0
100
200
300
400
1999 2000 2001
Growth in Submarine Cable Capacity to South America (in Gbps)
Internet in Latin America& Caribbean (LAC)
• mid-2000 to mid-2001, international Internet connectivity to Latin America & Caribbean grew 500%
• Growth twice as fast as any other world region
• 2,500% growth between Latin America countries
• Fastest growth of anyintra-regional bandwidth
Source: Telegeography, Packet Geography 2001
International Telecommunication Union
Inter-regional Internet backbone357 Mbit/s
19’716 Mbit/s
Asia-Pacific
LatinAmerica &Caribbean
2’638 Mbit/s
127 Mbit/s
Arab States, Africa
468 Mbit/s 171
Mbit/s
Europe
56’241 Mbit/sUSA &Canada
Source: TeleGeography Inc., Global Backbone Database. Data valid for Sept. 2000.
International Telecommunication Union
Top Latin America & CaribbeanInternet Hub Cities in 2001
Rank City, Country Internet Bandwidth (Mbps)
1 Miami, USA 7,825
2 São Paulo, Brazil 4,984
3 Buenos Aires, Argentina 4,017
4 Mexico City, Mexico 2,182
5 New York, USA 2,003
6 Santiago, Chile 1,770
7 Dallas, USA 1,546
8 Monterrey, Mexico 1,077
9 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 1,029
10 Los Angeles, USA 975
Source: Telegeography, Packet Geography 2001
International Telecommunication Union
Top Latin America International Internet Routes
Rank City, Country City, Country Internet Bandwidth (Mbps)
1 São Paulo, Brazil Miami, USA 3,384
2 Buenos Aires, Argentina Miami, USA 1,455
3 Mexico City, Mexico Dallas, USA 1,340
4 Buenos Aires, Argentina Santiago, Chile 824
5 Buenos Aires, Argentina New York, USA 698
6 Buenos Aires, Argentina São Paulo, Brazil 666
7 Monterrey, Mexico Los Angeles, USA 656
8 Santiago, Chile Miami, US 503
9 São Paulo, Brazil New York, USA 475
10 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil New York, USA 378
Source: Telegeography, Packet Geography 2001
International Telecommunication Union
IP Telephony: What is it?• Internet Protocol (IP) Telephony is a generic term
describing voice or fax carried over IP-based networks, such as the Internet.
• IP Telephony is important:– In the short-term, because it cuts the cost of calls,
especially if routed over the public Internet– In the longer-term, because telecoms carriers are
migrating their separate voice and data networks to converged IP-based networks
• Examples of IP Telephony Service Providers include Net2Phone, Dialpad.com, iBasis, etc.
International Telecommunication Union
Why is IP Telephony important?IP Telephony traffic, in million minutes
0.0% 0.2%
1.6%
5.5%
3.2%
0
1'000
2'000
3'000
4'000
5'000
6'000
7'000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
As percentage of int'l outgoing traffic
Source: ITU Internet Reports, adapted from TeleGeography Inc.
International Telecommunication Union
IP Telephony Flavours• Often treated differently from policy or
regulatory perspective– Carried solely across the public Internet– IP is underlying transport or signalling
technology for PSTN services (e.g., using SS7)– IP telephony on full end-to-end “private” IP
networks (e.g., using “softswitch technology”)– Combinations of the above with gateways
between Internet or private IP-based networks and the PSTN
International Telecommunication Union
Country positions on IP Telephony189 ITU Member States
As of March 2001. Based on responses to ITU regulatory questionnaire and inputs to WTPF-01.
No policy orNo response
98
Prohibited35
Regulated if "real-time"
7
Unregulated, 26 countries
Unregulated if not "real-time", 18
Light regulation
5
International Telecommunication Union
Pricing IP Voice Services• In high-price, monopoly markets
– Where permitted, IP Telephony creates opportunities for low-cost calls
– Even if not permitted, IP Telephony is widely used to reduce costs of international call termination
• In markets in transition to competition– IP Telephony offers a route towards early introduction
of competition and creates downward pressure on prices
• In competitive, low-price markets– Main market opportunity for IP Telephony is in value-
added services, e.g., unified messaging
International Telecommunication Union
What are the Key Issues?• Technical:
– How to define IP Telephony?– Is quality of service comparable? Will it improve?– How to handle numbering/addressing issues?
• Economic:– What price and cost savings can be expected?– How quickly will carriers migrate their networks?– Isn’t it just a form of bypass of telecom monopolies?
• Regulatory:– Is it voice or is it data?– License it? Prohibit it? Restrict it? Liberalise it?– Should IP Telephony providers contribute to Universal Service?
International Telecommunication Union
ITU Information Resources• ITU Internet Reports 2001: IP Telephony
– http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/inet/2000/• 2001 World Telecommunication Policy Forum: IP
Telephony– http://www.itu.int/wtpf/
• Secretary General’s Report on IP Telephony– http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/wtpf/wtpf2001/sgreport/
• ITU Internet Country Case Studies– http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/cs/
• IP Telephony Case Studies (e.g., Bolivia, Columbia, Peru)– http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/wtpf/wtpf2001/casestudies/
International Telecommunication Union
ITU Information Resources• ITU News Article on IP Telephony
– http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/cs/material/IPTelephony.pdf • BDT’s Meeting on WTPF Opinion D Part 3
– http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/e-strategy/internet/iptelephony/ • Workshop on Internet and IP Telephony, Lima, Perú,
18-20 July 2001– http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/e-strategy/internet/iptelephony/
Seminars/perujuly2001/• Note on IP Telephony for Americas Regional
Prepatory Meeting (16-18 October 2001) for WTDC 2002– http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/pdf/3982-007-en.PDF
International Telecommunication Union
ITU Information Resources• ITU-T Study Group 13: Lead Study Group for IP
related matters– http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com13/
• Some SG13 IP Overview Matters– http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com13/ip/
• ENUM (E.164 Numbering Plan Mapped to DNS)– http://www.itu.int/infocom/enum/ and http://www.itu.int/ITU-
T/studygroups/com02/ • Packetizer: A resource for packet-switched
conversational protocols (technical site by Rapporteur of ITU-T Q.2/16 dealing with H.323)– http://www.packetizer.com/