EMPLOYMENT OF DISABLED PEOPLE

Labour Force Survey – Ad hoc module 2011

(Contract number 10501.2010.004-2010.458)

Final Report

Vienna,

March 2012

Barbara Leitner

Content

1. Introduction....................................................................................................................3

2. Project organisation.......................................................................................................3

3. Methodological background...........................................................................................4

3.1. Survey design and sample.........................................................................................4

3.2. Elaboration of national questionnaire and testing......................................................4

3.3. Pre-Test......................................................................................................................4

3.4. Interviewer training and fieldwork...............................................................................6

3.5. Non-response.............................................................................................................6

3.6. Proxy interviews.........................................................................................................8

3.7. Weighting..................................................................................................................10

4. Remarks.......................................................................................................................10

5. Frequencies.................................................................................................................11

ANNEX....................................................................................................................................19

1.

2

1. Introduction

The ad hoc module 2011 “employment of disabled people” was carried out on the basis of regulation Regulation (EC) No 577/98 and the Commission Regulation (EC) No 365/2008 of 23 April 2008 adopting the programme of ad hoc modules, covering the years 2010, 2011 and 2012.

Two main policy frameworks - the European Disability Action Plan and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities - were used to guide the development of the 2011 Labour Force Survey ad hoc module.

In 2009 the Council adopted the decision concerning the conclusion by the Community of that UN Convention, which amongst others obliges States parties to report on the implementation of the UN Convention and to collect appropriate information (Article 31).

In line with these policy needs, the aim of the ad hoc module is to provide information on the situation on the labour market of disabled people.

2. Project organisation

Drafting, internal discussion of questionnaire September 2010

National experts working group September 2010 - October 2010

Pre-Test 18.10.2010 - 22.10.2010

Interim Report 29.10.2010 and 1.12.2010

Programming of questionnaire October 2010

Preparation of training material for interviewers November 2010 – December 2010

Translation of questionnaire November 2010

Interviewer training 14.12.2010 - 17.12.2010

Field work start calendar week 2, 2011

Field work end calendar week 5, 2012

Production of data file for Eurostat February 2012 - March 2012

Delivery of the data set to Eurostat calendar week 12, 2012

3

3. Methodological background

3.1. Survey design and sample

The survey is based on the Austrian LFS. The sample frame is the central inhabitant address register. A random stratified sample was drawn (using federal provinces (NUTS 2-regions) as criteria for stratification), the sampling unit is the dwelling. All inhabitants of a dwelling are interviewed for the LFS. The Austrian LFS consists of a rotating sample of five waves. Every quarter the wave already surveyed five times is replaced by a new wave. All households of the first wave are interviewed face to face using computer assisted personal interviews (CAPI). Households of the subsequent waves are normally interviewed by telephone using computer assisted telephone interviews (CATI).

The planned gross sample size for the target population (15 to 64 years) of the module 2011 was about 25.000 persons, which should be asked via CAPI first wave. Due to legal reasons, it was necessary to change to a voluntary data collection after the first quarter. Therefore, it was not be possible to reach the originally planned number of collected interviews. Instead of 25.000 interviews we got about 20.000 interviews.

If a person could not be reached, a proxy interview was allowed. The proxy interview consisted of a short set of questions (V01_1 to V04_2), which could be answered by the proxy person with an acceptable loss of quality. The missing information was supplemented by imputation, which was based on the information of the LFS-interview.

3.2. Elaboration of national questionnaire

The elaboration of the questionnaire took place in September 2010. After drafting the questionnaire in German according to the EU requirements, the questionnaire was discussed by a national ad hoc working group which consisted of national experts from the fields of disability and labour market. The major ministries, representatives from the social partners, federal and national statisticians and representatives of the scientific community had the possibility to annotate the draft questionnaire and to propose changes. Subsequently, adaptations of the questionnaire were made.In October 2010, the questionnaire version for the pre-test has been programmed in BLAISE, the interviewer software used at Statistics Austria. The questionnaire design uses the possibilities of an electronic questionnaire which allows special routing, alternate wording for specific target groups as well as the use of already existing information from previous questions.

3.3. Pre-Test

The pre-test of the questionnaire took place in the telephone studio in October 2010. Target group of the test were people of the LFS sample between 45 and 64 years, because in this age group people with disabilities can be found more often. For this pre-test a draft version of the Austrian questionnaire was designed. 212 persons were asked by telephone interviews. The main goal of this test was to find out possible problems and a verification of the programming of the questionnaire. Additionally, some questions concerning the

4

understanding of the questions were asked. After evaluating the results of the pre-tests, last modifications of the questionnaire were made. After finalizing the questionnaire it was translated in English, Turkish and Bosnian/Serbian/Croatian-Language. The questions for the ad hoc module were added after the core LFS.

Pretest

 

Response Group

N %Total 212 100,0Male 93 43,9

Female 119 56,1

Age    

45-54 120 56,6

55-64 92 43,4

Employment Status    

Employed 136 64,2

Unemployed 7 3,3

Out of labour force 69 32,5

Nationality    

Austria 207 97,6

EU 27 (without Austria) 2 0,94

Former Yugoslavia (without Slowenia) 1 0,47

Turkey 0 0,00

Other 2 0,94

Highest education attained    

Isced 0-2 and 3c short 37 17,5

Isced 3-4 (without 3c short) 140 66,0

Isced 5-6 35 16,5

Federal provinces (Nuts 2)    

Burgenland 22 10,4

Carinthia 31 14,6

Lower Austria 23 10,8

Upper Austria 32 15,1

Salzburg 18 8,5

Styria 20 9,4

Tyrol 23 10,8

Vorarlberg 17 8,0

Vienna 26 12,3

5

3.4. Interviewer training and fieldwork

Before the start of the field work for the module, the interviewers were trained to carry out the interviews. The training of the interviewers covered written material explaining the focus of the ad hoc module, but moreover all questions of the questionnaire were explained in detail. After explaining the questionnaire the interviewers had to train the questionnaire on the laptops. Using model respondents they had to find out the correct answers and routings.

The field period started in the first quarter of 2011. The survey was carried out the whole year 2011. The field work ended in the 5th calendar week of 2012.

3.5. Non-response

Unit non-response

The unit non-response rate for the ad hoc module 2011 was 19.0%. The unit non-response was adjusted by weighting. The unit non-response was higher for men than for women and also higher for younger respondents from 15 to 24 years old (23.0%) than for older ones.

Regarding employment status the highest unit non-response-rate was found within persons in community service and conscripts as well as people out of labour force.

Austrians and persons with a nationality of one of the EU-countries have a lower average unit non-response-rate than persons with other nationalities. Persons with lower educational level have a higher share of unit non-responses than persons with higher education.

The federal province with the highest unit non-response-rate is Burgenland (24.5%) those with the lowest one Tyrol (15.8%).

6

Unit non-response

 

Target Group 15 -

34

Response Group Unit non-response

N N % N %Total 24.232 19.631 81,0 4.601 19,0Male 11.947 9.636 80,7 2.311 19,3Female 12.285 9.995 81,4 2.290 18,6Age          15-24 4.196 3.230 77,0 966 23,025-34 4.091 3.374 82,5 717 17,535-44 5.358 4.409 82,3 949 17,745-54 6.015 4.854 80,7 1.161 19,355-64 4.572 3.764 82,3 808 17,7Employment Status          Employed 17.039 13.931 81,8 3.108 18,2Unemployed 760 610 80,3 150 19,7Out of labour force 6.345 5.025 79,2 1.320 20,8Conscript, Community service 88 65 73,9 23 26,1Nationality          Austria 21.513 17.575 81,7 3.938 18,3EU 27 (without Austria) 952 774 81,3 178 18,7Former Yugoslavia (without Slowenia) 884 675 76,4 209 23,6Turkey 398 264 66,3 134 33,7Other 485 343 70,7 142 29,3Highest education attained          Isced 0-2 and 3c short 5.777 4.475 77,5 1.302 22,5Isced 3-4 (without 3c short) 14.751 12.116 82,1 2.635 17,9Isced 5-6 3.704 3.040 82,1 664 17,9Federal provinces (Nuts 2)          Burgenland 1.891 1.428 75,5 463 24,5Carinthia 2.520 2.082 82,6 438 17,4Lower Austria 3.095 2.576 83,2 519 16,8Upper Austria 3.067 2.402 78,3 665 21,7Salzburg 2.695 2.162 80,2 533 19,8Styria 2.451 2.051 83,7 400 16,3Tyrol 2.866 2.412 84,2 454 15,8Vorarlberg 2.700 2.188 81,0 512 19,0Vienna 2.947 2.330 79,1 617 20,9

7

Item non-response

In order to complete records with missing items k-Nearest-Neighbour imputation (k=3) was implemented. Missing values occur because of item non-response and implausible values detected during data collection and processing. The distances were calculated with Gower-Distance-Function.

The variables ‘age’, ‘sex’, ‘citizenship’, ‘federal provinces’ and ‘labour status’ were used to compute distances for all variables with missing items. Additional variables for distance computation were used based on causal dependences between the variables. The detailed information on imputation-rate is given in the quality report.

3.6. Proxy interviews

Proxy interviews were allowed for the ad hoc module and overall the share of proxy interviews was 25.8%.

Women gave more often self-response than men and the proxy rate is much higher for younger respondents from 15 to 24 years old (59.3%) than for older ones.

Regarding employment status most proxy interviews were given for persons out of labour force (28.0%) and for conscripts and persons in community service (69.2%). Austrians and persons with a nationality of one of the EU-countries have a lower average proxy rate than persons with other nationalities.

Persons with lower educational level have a higher share of proxy interviews, which is in accordance with the results regarding age-groups. The federal province with the highest proxy rate is Salzburg (30.4%) those with the lowest one Vienna (20.7%).

8

 Proxy interviews

Respondents Proxy

N N %Total 19.631 5.074 25,8Male 9.636 2.873 29,8

Female 9.995 2.201 22,0

Age      

15-24 3.230 1.917 59,3

25-34 3.374 862 25,5

35-44 4.409 917 20,8

45-54 4.854 870 17,9

55-64 3.764 508 13,5

Employment Status      

Employed 13.931 3.486 25,0

Unemployed 610 135 22,1

Out of labour force 5.025 1.408 28,0

Conscript, Community service 65 45 69,2

Nationality      

Austria 17.575 4.494 25,6

EU 27 (without Austria) 774 162 20,9

Former Yugoslavia (without Slowenia) 675 210 31,1

Turkey 264 107 40,5

Other 343 101 29,4

Highest education attained      

Isced 0-2 and 3c short 4.475 1.605 35,9

Isced 3-4 (without 3c short) 12.116 2.838 23,4

Isced 5-6 3.040 631 20,8

Federal provinces (Nuts 2)      

Burgenland 1.428 329 23,0

Carinthia 2.082 543 26,1

Lower Austria 2.576 688 26,7

Upper Austria 2.402 548 22,8

Salzburg 2.162 658 30,4

Styria 2.051 570 27,8

Tyrol 2.412 686 28,4

Vorarlberg 2.188 569 26,0

Vienna 2.330 483 20,7

9

3.7. Weighting

The weights were calculated iteratively in order to get grossed up frequency distributions of the module sample which agree with the corresponding frequency distributions of the average of the four quarterly LFS samples in 2011.

In a first step the weights were calculated in such a manner that the resulting grossed up distribution of the module sample classified by federal provinces (9 Bundesländer), times sex and times five year age groups, was in accordance to the same distribution of the average of the four quarterly LFS samples of 2011.

In a second step the weights resulting from the first step were adjusted multiplicatively to let agree the resulting grossed up distribution of the module sample classified by federal provinces (9 Bundesländer), times five nationality-groups (Austria, EU-15, former Yugoslavia, Turkey, others) to the same distribution of the average of the four quarterly LFS samples of 2011.

In a third step the weights were adjusted to labour status (employed, unemployed, else) times federal provinces times sex.

Finally the weights were adjusted to federal provinces, times country of birth (Austria, not Austria) according to the population distribution of the average of the four quarterly LFS samples of 2011.

The steps were repeated until the weights did not change any more.

The quarterly population figures of the LFS correspond to the population with main residence at the beginning of each quarter minus persons in institutional households as given by the central population register.

4. Remarks

Limhours/Limtypew/Limtrans: It is difficult for respondents to distinguish between a disease and the difficulty in activity as the disease often causes such difficulties. Therefore the answer should be only dichotomous (yes/no).

10

5. Frequencies

Healthma Type of longstanding health condition or disease (code first main type)

Häufigkeit Prozent

Gültige

Prozente

Kumulierte

Prozente

Gültig 1 Problems with the arms

or hands (including arthritis

and rheumatism)

602 3,1 3,1 3,1

2 Problems with the legs or

feet (including arthritis and

rheumatism)

1045 5,3 5,3 8,4

3 Problems with the back

or neck (including arthritis

and rheumatism)

2871 14,6 14,6 23,0

4 Cancer 172 ,9 ,9 23,9

5 Skin conditions, including

allergic reactions and

severe disfigurement

492 2,5 2,5 26,4

6 Problems with the heart,

blood pressure or

circulation

840 4,3 4,3 30,7

7 Problems with the chest

or breathing (including

asthma and bronchitis)

355 1,8 1,8 32,5

8 Problems with the

stomach, liver, kidneys or

digestion

362 1,8 1,8 34,3

9 Diabetes 201 1,0 1,0 35,4

10 Epilepsy (including

epileptic fits)

59 ,3 ,3 35,7

11 Severe headaches, e.g.

migraine

527 2,7 2,7 38,3

12 Learning disabilities

affecting reading, writing or

arithmetic

102 ,5 ,5 38,9

13 Chronic anxiety

disorders (e.g. panic

attacks)

77 ,4 ,4 39,2

14 Depression 251 1,3 1,3 40,5

11

15 Other nervous or

mental problems (e.g.

schizophrenia, affective

disorders, anorexia, burn-

out)

147 ,7 ,7 41,3

16 Other ongoing illnesses

(including multiple

sclerosis, HIV, Alzheimer’s

disease, Parkinson’s

disease)

91 ,5 ,5 41,7

17 Other long-term health

problems (including

obesity, alcohol or drug

addiction)

95 ,5 ,5 42,2

18 no longstanding health

conditions or diseases

11342 57,8 57,8 100,0

Gesamt 19631 100,0 100,0

Healthse Type of longstanding health condition or disease (code second main type)

Häufigkeit Prozent

Gültige

Prozente

Kumulierte

Prozente

Gültig 1 Problems with the arms

or hands (including arthritis

and rheumatism)

509 2,6 2,6 2,6

2 Problems with the legs or

feet (including arthritis and

rheumatism)

670 3,4 3,4 6,0

3 Problems with the back

or neck (including arthritis

and rheumatism)

1037 5,3 5,3 11,3

4 Cancer 31 ,2 ,2 11,4

5 Skin conditions, including

allergic reactions and

severe disfigurement

232 1,2 1,2 12,6

6 Problems with the heart,

blood pressure or

circulation

544 2,8 2,8 15,4

7 Problems with the chest

or breathing (including

asthma and bronchitis)

195 1,0 1,0 16,4

12

8 Problems with the

stomach, liver, kidneys or

digestion

225 1,1 1,1 17,5

9 Diabetes 86 ,4 ,4 18,0

10 Epilepsy (including

epileptic fits)

17 ,1 ,1 18,1

11 Severe headaches, e.g.

migraine

275 1,4 1,4 19,5

12 Learning disabilities

affecting reading, writing or

arithmetic

61 ,3 ,3 19,8

13 Chronic anxiety

disorders (e.g. panic

attacks)

78 ,4 ,4 20,2

14 Depression 132 ,7 ,7 20,8

15 Other nervous or

mental problems (e.g.

schizophrenia, affective

disorders, anorexia, burn-

out)

81 ,4 ,4 21,3

16 Other ongoing illnesses

(including multiple

sclerosis, HIV, Alzheimer’s

disease, Parkinson’s

disease)

26 ,1 ,1 21,4

17 Other long-term health

problems (including

obesity, alcohol or drug

addiction)

63 ,3 ,3 21,7

99 not applicable /not in

filter

15369 78,3 78,3 100,0

Gesamt 19631 100,0 100,0

13

Difficma First basic activity difficulty (code of the most important difficulty)

Häufigkeit Prozent

Gültige

Prozente

Kumulierte

Prozente

Gültig 1 Seeing (even if aids such

as glasses or contact

lenses are worn)

827 4,2 4,2 4,2

2 Hearing (even if a

hearing aid is worn)

282 1,4 1,4 5,6

3 Walking or climbing

stairs

685 3,5 3,5 9,1

4 Sitting or standing 415 2,1 2,1 11,3

5 Remembering,

concentrating

200 1,0 1,0 12,3

6 Conversing with other

people (e.g. understanding

or being understood)

112 ,6 ,6 12,8

7 Stretching to reach

something (e.g. to reach

an object)

109 ,6 ,6 13,4

8 Lifting and carrying

things (e.g. a heavy

shopping bag)

1351 6,9 6,9 20,3

9 Bending down 528 2,7 2,7 23,0

10 Holding, grasping or

turning something (e.g.

turning on a tap)

151 ,8 ,8 23,7

11 none 14971 76,3 76,3 100,0

Gesamt 19631 100,0 100,0

14

Difficse First basic activity difficulty (code of the second most important difficulty)

Häufigkeit Prozent

Gültige

Prozente

Kumulierte

Prozente

Gültig 1 Seeing (even if aids such

as glasses or contact

lenses are worn)

115 ,6 ,6 ,6

2 Hearing (even if a

hearing aid is worn)

91 ,5 ,5 1,0

3 Walking or climbing

stairs

249 1,3 1,3 2,3

4 Sitting or standing 294 1,5 1,5 3,8

5 Remembering,

concentrating

83 ,4 ,4 4,2

6 Conversing with other

people (e.g. understanding

or being understood)

73 ,4 ,4 4,6

7 Stretching to reach

something (e.g. to reach

an object)

100 ,5 ,5 5,1

8 Lifting and carrying

things (e.g. a heavy

shopping bag)

578 2,9 2,9 8,1

9 Bending down 564 2,9 2,9 10,9

10 Holding, grasping or

turning something (e.g.

turning on a tap)

66 ,3 ,3 11,3

99 not applicable /not in

filter

17418 88,7 88,7 100,0

Gesamt 19631 100,0 100,0

15

Limhours The health condition(s) or disease(s) or difficulty(ies) cause(s) the person’s

limitation in the number of hours that he/she can work in a week

Häufigkeit Prozent

Gültige

Prozente

Kumulierte

Prozente

Gültig 1 Yes, the health

condition(s) or disease(s)

1273 6,5 6,5 6,5

2 Yes, the activity

difficulty(ies)

289 1,5 1,5 8,0

3 Yes, both, the health

condition(s)/disease(s) and

the activity difficulty(ies)

678 3,5 3,5 11,4

4 No 7061 36,0 36,0 47,4

9 Not applicable (not

included in filter)

10330 52,6 52,6 100,0

Gesamt 19631 100,0 100,0

Limtypew The health condition(s) or disease(s) or difficulty(ies) cause(s) the person’s

limitation in the type of work (for instance, having problems in carrying heavy loads, working

outdoors, sitting for a long time) that he/she can do

Häufigkeit Prozent

Gültige

Prozente

Kumulierte

Prozente

Gültig 1 Yes, the health

condition(s) or disease(s)

1393 7,1 7,1 7,1

2 Yes, the activity

difficulty(ies)

388 2,0 2,0 9,1

3 Yes, both, the health

condition(s)/disease(s) and

the activity difficulty(ies)

758 3,9 3,9 12,9

4 No 6762 34,4 34,4 47,4

9 Not applicable (not

included in filter)

10330 52,6 52,6 100,0

Gesamt 19631 100,0 100,0

16

Limtrans The health condition(s) or disease(s) or difficulty(ies) cause(s) the person’s

limitation in getting to and from work

Häufigkeit Prozent

Gültige

Prozente

Kumulierte

Prozente

Gültig 1 Yes, the health

condition(s) or disease(s)

361 1,8 1,8 1,8

2 Yes, the activity

difficulty(ies)

80 ,4 ,4 2,2

3 Yes, both, the health

condition(s)/disease(s) and

the activity difficulty(ies)

257 1,3 1,3 3,6

4 No 8603 43,8 43,8 47,4

9 Not applicable (not

included in filter)

10330 52,6 52,6 100,0

Gesamt 19631 100,0 100,0

Needhelp Because of the health condition(s)/disease(s) or activity difficulty(ies) the person

needs (not employed persons)/uses (employed persons) personal assistance to enable

him/her to work

Häufigkeit Prozent

Gültige

Prozente

Kumulierte

Prozente

Gültig 1 Yes 518 2,6 2,6 2,6

2 No 8783 44,7 44,7 47,4

9 Not applicable (not

included in filter)

10330 52,6 52,6 100,0

Gesamt 19631 100,0 100,0

Needadap Because of the health condition(s)/disease(s) or activity difficulty(ies) the person

needs (not employed persons)/uses (employed persons) special equipment or needs (not

employed persons)/has (employed persons) workplace adaptations to enable him/her to work

Häufigkeit Prozent

Gültige

Prozente

Kumulierte

Prozente

Gültig 1 Yes 442 2,3 2,3 2,3

2 No 8859 45,1 45,1 47,4

9 Not applicable (not

included in filter)

10330 52,6 52,6 100,0

Gesamt 19631 100,0 100,0

17

Needorga Because of the health condition(s)/disease(s) or activity difficulty(ies) the person

needs (not employed persons)/has (employed persons) special working arrangements to

enable him/her to work (such as, sedentary jobs, teleworking, flexible hours or less

strenuous work)

Häufigkeit Prozent

Gültige

Prozente

Kumulierte

Prozente

Gültig 1 Yes 1015 5,2 5,2 5,2

2 No 8286 42,2 42,2 47,4

9 Not applicable (not

included in filter)

10330 52,6 52,6 100,0

Gesamt 19631 100,0 100,0

Limreas Limreas/Main reason for limitation in work (number of hours, type, getting to and

from work) that is not caused by the longstanding health conditions/diseases or basic

activity difficulties

Häufigkeit Prozent

Gültige

Prozente

Kumulierte

Prozente

Gültig 1 Lack of

qualifications/experience

840 4,3 4,3 4,3

2 Lack of appropriate job

opportunities

464 2,4 2,4 6,6

3 Lack or poor

transportation to and from

workplace

149 ,8 ,8 7,4

4 Employers lack of

flexibility

175 ,9 ,9 8,3

5 Affects receipt of benefits 85 ,4 ,4 8,7

6 Family/caring

responsibilities

1026 5,2 5,2 14,0

7 Personal reasons 309 1,6 1,6 15,5

8 Other reasons 440 2,2 2,2 17,8

9 No limitation in work 16143 82,2 82,2 100,0

Gesamt 19631 100,0 100,0

18

ANNEX

Description of the datasetWRITE OUTFILE='P:\101DA\Arbeitsmarkt\LFS_AHM11\09 techn Bericht, Datensatz an Eurostat\Datensatz '+ 'an Eurostat\AHM 2011_Eurostat kurz.dat' TABLE /ALL.

Write will generate the following

Variable Rec Start End Formathhseqnum 1 1 2 F2.0hhlink 1 3 3 F1.0hhspou 1 4 5 F2.0hhfath 1 6 7 F2.0hhmoth 1 8 9 F2.0sex 1 10 10 F1.0yearbir 1 11 14 F4.0datebir 1 15 15 F1.0marstat 1 16 16 F1.0national 1 17 18 A2yearesid 1 19 20 F2.0countryb 1 21 22 A2proxy 1 23 23 F1.0wstator 1 24 24 F1.0nowkreas 1 25 26 F2.0stapro 1 27 27 F1.0signisal 1 28 28 F1.0nace3d 1 29 31 F3.0isco4d 1 32 35 F4.0supvisor 1 36 36 F1.0sizefirm 1 37 38 F2.0countryw 1 39 40 A2regionw 1 41 42 A2ystartwk 1 43 46 F4.0mstartwk 1 47 48 F2.0wayjfoun 1 49 49 F1.0ftpt 1 50 50 F1.0ftptreas 1 51 51 F1.0temp 1 52 52 F1.0tempreas 1 53 53 F1.0tempdur 1 54 54 F1.0tempagcy 1 55 55 F1.0shiftwk 1 56 56 F1.0evenwk 1 57 57 F1.0nightwk 1 58 58 F1.0satwk 1 59 59 F1.0sunwk 1 60 60 F1.0hwusual 1 61 62 F2.0hwactual 1 63 64 F2.0hwoverp 1 65 66 F2.0hwoverpu 1 67 68 F2.0hourreas 1 69 70 F2.0wishmore 1 71 71 F1.0waymore 1 72 72 F1.0hwwish 1 73 74 F2.0homewk 1 75 75 F1.0lookoj 1 76 76 F1.0

19

lookreas 1 77 77 F1.0exist2j 1 78 78 F1.0stapro2j 1 79 79 F1.0nace2j2d 1 80 81 F2.0hwactua2 1 82 83 F2.0existpr 1 84 84 F1.0yearpr 1 85 88 F4.0monthpr 1 89 90 F2.0leavreas 1 91 92 F2.0stapropr 1 93 93 F1.0nacepr2d 1 94 95 F2.0iscopr3d 1 96 98 F3.0seekwork 1 99 99 F1.0seekreas 1 100 100 F1.0seektype 1 101 101 F1.0seekdur 1 102 102 F1.0methoda 1 103 103 F1.0methodb 1 104 104 F1.0methodc 1 105 105 F1.0methodd 1 106 106 F1.0methode 1 107 107 F1.0methodf 1 108 108 F1.0methodg 1 109 109 F1.0methodh 1 110 110 F1.0methodi 1 111 111 F1.0methodj 1 112 112 F1.0methodk 1 113 113 F1.0methodl 1 114 114 F1.0methodm 1 115 115 F1.0wantwork 1 116 116 F1.0available 1 117 117 F1.0avaireas 1 118 118 F1.0preseek 1 119 119 F1.0needcare 1 120 120 F1.0register 1 121 121 F1.0mainstat 1 122 122 F1.0educstat 1 123 123 F1.0educlevl 1 124 124 F1.0educfild 1 125 127 F3.0couratt 1 128 128 F1.0courlen 1 129 131 F3.0courpurp 1 132 132 F1.0courfild 1 133 135 F3.0courworh 1 136 136 F1.0hatlevel 1 137 138 F2.0hatfield 1 139 141 F3.0hatyear 1 142 145 F4.0wstat1y 1 146 146 F1.0stapro1y 1 147 147 F1.0nace1y2d 1 148 149 F2.0countr1y 1 150 151 A2region1y 1 152 153 F2.0incdecil 1 154 155 F2.0refyear 1 156 159 F4.0refweek 1 160 161 F2.0intweek 1 162 163 F2.0country 1 164 165 A2region 1 166 167 F2.0degurba 1 168 168 F1.0hhnum 1 169 174 F6.0hhtype 1 175 175 F1.0hhinst 1 176 176 F1.0

20

coeffy 1 177 182 F6.0coeffq 1 183 188 F6.0coeffh 1 189 194 F6.0intwave 1 195 195 F1.0intquest 1 196 196 F1.0Healthma 1 197 198 F2.0Healthse 1 199 200 F2.0Difficma 1 201 202 F2.0Difficse 1 203 204 F2.0Limhours 1 205 205 F1.0Limtypew 1 206 206 F1.0Limtrans 1 207 207 F1.0Needhelp 1 208 208 F1.0Needadap 1 209 209 F1.0Needorga 1 210 210 F1.0Limreas 1 211 212 F2.0weight 1 213 218 F6.0EXECUTE.

21

National questionnaire of the ad hoc module 2011 in German, English, Bosnian/Serbian/Croatian-Language and Turkish

Interviewer instructions in German

22