intertanko north american panel 17 march 2008 united states coast guard jeff lantz director of...

24
INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

Upload: letitia-hopkins

Post on 01-Jan-2016

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

INTERTANKO North American Panel

17 March 2008

United States Coast Guard

Jeff LantzDirector of Commercial Vessel Regulations

and Standards

Page 2: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard2

Rate of Detention by Vessel TypeDetention Rate by Vessel Type 2003-2006

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%

7.00%

*All Tanker(crude oil, oil

products, chem,chem/oil)

Bulk Carrier Container Ship General CargoShip

LPG/LNG Tanker RefrigeratedCargo Ship

DayCruise/Gambling

Vessel

Ro-Ro CargoShip/Vehicle

carrier

2003 Detentions

2004 Detentions

2005 Detentions

2006 Detentions

2003-2006 Average = 1.83%

Page 3: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard3

Rates of Vessel Arrivals vs. Detentionsby Age of Vessel

4.47%

0.81%0.37% 1.57% 2.50%

10.92%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

0-4 years 5-9 years 10-14 years 15-19 years 20-24 years 24+ years

Vessel Age (Years)

Rat

e Detention Rate

Total Arrivals

5 Year Average for Flag State Targeting = 2.14%

Page 4: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard

Detainable Deficiencies Despite required compliance dates of more than 5 years ago, the

U.S. continues to find that ISM related deficiencies constitute a very large proportion of detainable items.

One of the largest increases in detainable deficiencies this year was in the area of crew competency.

ISPS/Security Related 91 18%

ISM Related 82 16%

MARPOL, Annex I 61 12%

Crew Competency 52 10%

Fire Fighting Appliances 48 9%

Page 5: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard

Summary of PSC Performance 2006 2007 % increase

Safety Detentions 110 152 38%

Major Control Actions 35 42 20%

Safety Rolling Detention Ratio 2006: 1.78%Safety Rolling Detention Ratio 2007: 1.60% 1

Security Major Control Action Ratio 2006: 0.43% 2

Security Major Control Action Ratio 2007: 0.53 1 & 2

Note 1: 2007 preliminary data, subject to changeNote 2: In 2006, the CAR targeting level was fixed at

1.50% for all flag registries.

Page 6: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard

USCG, Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU Detention Rates

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

USCG Detention Rate

Paris MOU Detention Rate

Tokyo MOU Detention Rate

Page 7: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard

QUALSHIP 21- “Quality Shipping for the 21st Century”

Qualifying Registries for 2007:

Barbados China Marshall IslandsBelize Greece PhilippinesBermuda Hong Kong Republic of Korea Canada Israel United Kingdom Cayman Islands

Qualifying Registries for 2008 will be announced in May 2008 and vessel flying their flag will be eligible until May 2009.

Due to excellent performance from certain flag States, there will likely be additions to the current qualified flag States.

7

Page 8: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard

Positive Policy Impact HIV - revised (June 07)

decreased boardings by 50%

1st time US arrivals not automatic HIV

No double jeopardy for Certain Dangerous Cargoes (CDC) vessels

COTP flexibility to downgrade

PSC - revised (June 07)

Smarter targeting = Fewer random *(how much…50%...what are the numbers)

Modification to targeting rules = less redundancy (LPOC rules)

2007 HIV Summary

020406080

100120140160180

Month

Nu

mb

er

of

HIV

s135,240 Vessel Arrivals

Page 9: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard

Conditions of Entry Additional security measures may be imposed on ships

arriving to U.S. ports from countries not maintaining effective anti-terrorism measures as a Condition of Entry

Concerns are discussed with country

Conditions of Entry are a last resort

Advance public notice given

Specific facilities or ports in a country may be exempted if adequate security is found in that particular facility

Countries for which Conditions of Entry are imposedCameroon Liberia

Equatorial Guinea Mauritania

Guinea-Bissau Syria

Indonesia

9

Page 10: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard

Conditions of Entry Requirements – Vessels must…

While in the foreign port with inadequate anti-terrorism measures: Implement measures per the ship’s security plan equivalent to Security Level 2;

Ensure that each access point to the ship is guarded and that the guards have total visibility of the exterior (both landside and waterside) of the vessel.

Attempt to execute a Declaration of Security;

Log all security actions in the ship’s log; and

Report actions taken to the cognizant U.S. Coast Guard Sector Commander prior to arrival in the U.S.

While in U.S. ports, after arriving from a foreign port with inadequate anti-terrorism measures: Ensure that each access point to the ship is guarded by armed security guards and that

they have total visibility of the exterior (both landside and waterside) of the vessel. The number and location of the guards must be acceptable to the cognizant U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port.

Page 11: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard

Interaction with marine industryALCOAST 108/08, 6 March 2008

Restore professionalism, respect and trust

Openness and transparency will be our hallmarks

Boarding members, marine inspectors, PSCOs will encourage open communication with mariners

Senior leadership contact information will be provided

Resolve issues at lowest level possible – encourage, facilitate and expedite appeals

Identify and resolve pending issues, identify best practices and recommendations

Actions that restrict vessel movement will be affirmed

11

Page 12: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard12

Page 13: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard

http://homeport.uscg.mil

Page 14: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard

USEFUL SITES1. HOMEPORT - http://homeport.uscg.mil

2. CFR - http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-table-search.html

3. NVIC – http://www.uscg.mil/hq/g-m/nvic/index.htm

4. E-NOA - www.nvmc.uscg.gov

5. COFR - http://www.uscg.mil/npfc/COFRs/index.htm

6. VRP Info - http://www.uscg.mil/vrp/

7. E-VRP Database – http://www.e-vrp.com

8. Ballast Water - http://invasions.si.edu/nbic/submit.html

9. PSIX - http://cgmix.uscg.mil/psix/

Page 15: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard15

Thank you

Page 16: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard16

USCG Port State Control Exams

Conduct Navigation Safety Checks Evaluate the Safety Management System Evaluate the Vessel’s Security System Conduct a Deck Walk and Evaluate the Vessel’s Structure Conduct Steering Gear Tests Test the Oily Water Separator and Bilge Monitor Test the Fire Detection System Test the Fixed Deck Foam System (Oil Tankers Only, use water) Operate the Main and Emergency Fire Pump Examine Emergency Lighting Test the Emergency Generator Witness Fire & Boat Drills Evaluate ILO Conditions That May Be Unacceptable

Page 17: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard

Back – up slides

Page 18: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard

MARPOL Annex I EnforcementMARPOL Annex I Enforcement

• U.S. Coast Guard enforcement of MARPOL Annex I has been enhanced by issuance of policy guidance, G-PCV Policy Letter 06-01.

• U.S. Government criminal investigations into MARPOL Annex I violations show vessel and crew concealment of pollution discharge caused by poorly maintained or faulty equipment, or by vessels taking short cuts to save money.

• U.S. Coast Guard continues to partner with IMO and other Port State Control regimes to ensure consistent enforcement of MARPOL Annex I requirements.

18

Page 19: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard

QUALSHIP 21- “Quality Shipping for the 21st Century”

Eligibility Requirements:

• Must not have an IMO Detention in U.S. waters within the previous 36-months

• Must not have any marine violations (civil or criminal) and no more than one paid Notice of Violation (ticket) case, within the previous 36-month period

• Must not have a reportable marine casualty that meets the criteria of a serious marine incident (46CFR4.03-2) in U.S. waters within the previous 36-months.

• Must have completed a successful, U.S. Port State Control exam within the previous 12-month period.

• Must not be classed by or have their statutory Convention Certificates issued by a targeted class society.

19

Page 20: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard20

QUALSHIP 21- “Quality Shipping for the 21st Century”

Eligibility Requirements (Cont):

• Must not be registered with a Flag State that has an overall U.S. IMO detention percentage of more than 1% over the previous three-year period. Also, the vessel’s Flag State must have at least 10 distinct arrivals in each of the previous 3 years.

• Vessel’s Flag State must have submitted their Self-Assessment of Flag State Performance to the IMO and provided a copy to the USCG.

Qualship 21 Certificates: - Qualship 21 certificates are good for 2 years and the issue date is based on the vessel’s last successful U.S. PSC exam.

Page 21: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard21

ISPS/MTSA Security Compliance

Vessel Security Level Verify ISSC Verify Ship Security Performance Review the CSR and other Records Ship ID (IMO number) Manning Non-Convention Vessel Security

Compliance Examination

Objective - determine whether vessel meets International Conventions and U.S. Domestic Law

Page 22: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard22

Verify Ship Security Performance

Verify Ship Security Plan (SSP) is onboard and safeguarded

SSP not subject to direct inspection

If clear grounds exist that required security procedures are not in place, the PSCO will investigate.

PSCO may examine the relevant sections of the plan after exhausting other means to determine compliance.

PSCO must obtain the consent of the vessel’s flag State, or the master of the vessel as specified in ISPS Code Part A, 9.8.1 before examining relevant portions of the SSP.

Page 23: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard23

Security Records

Training, drills, & exercises

Reports of security incidents/breaches

Changes in Security levels

External communications related to Ship Security

Internal audits/reviews

Periodic reviews of ship security assessments/plans

Maintenance, calibration, & testing of security equipment

Page 24: INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard

Conditions of Entry Requirements – Vessels must…

While in the foreign port with inadequate anti-terrorism measures: Implement measures per the ship’s security plan equivalent to Security Level 2;

Ensure that each access point to the ship is guarded and that the guards have total visibility of the exterior (both landside and waterside) of the vessel.

Attempt to execute a Declaration of Security;

Log all security actions in the ship’s log; and

Report actions taken to the cognizant U.S. Coast Guard Sector Commander prior to arrival in the U.S.

While in U.S. ports, after arriving from a foreign port with inadequate anti-terrorism measures: Ensure that each access point to the ship is guarded by armed security guards and that

they have total visibility of the exterior (both landside and waterside) of the vessel. The number and location of the guards must be acceptable to the cognizant U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port.