interviewing stakeholders: evaluating support for policy change in your community
TRANSCRIPT
Objectives
1. Identify different types of interviewing techniques & know when to use
2. Describe ‘basic rules’ of successful interviewing
3. Demonstrate skill in interviewing that you will be able to apply in your policy evaluations
Your Facilitators
Lynn Hrabik, NE Region
Jennifer Leahy, Program Assistant
Edward Minter, SE Region
Bonita Westover, S & W Region
Interviews
At the most basic level, are conversations.
That, attempt to understand points of view, unfold the meaning of experiences, uncover changes in individuals, groups and
communities.
Why Interview Be personal and
unobtrusive Obtain direct feedback Seek understanding
“dig deeper”
Observe behaviors and reactions
Obtain rich, detailed data To be flexible
Types of Interviews
1. Informal Conversation
2. Guided Interview
3. Structured Interview
Adapted from M. Patton, 1990
Types of Interviews
Informal Conversation May happen spontaneously in the course of field work, and respondent may not even know that an “interview” is taking place.
Questions emerge from the immediate context of the conversation and are often not predetermined.
Informal Conversation
When to UseWhen the interviewer has: Solid knowledge and experience with the
subject matter
Strong interpersonal skills to maintain the conversation
The situation presents the opportunity
Ability to record data quickly
Informal Conversation
Situations Social gathering
School event
Before/after a public meeting
Whenever you have their attention and can engage the conversation
Types of Interviews
Guided Interview Widely used. Interviewer has an established outline of topics/questions to be covered.
Wording and order of questions can vary to an extent.
Guided Interview
When to UseWhen you have: Solid knowledge and experience with the
subject matter – you know what to ask
A set of questions you want everyone to answer
Questions that you want to compare or summarize across individuals
Types of Interviews
Structured InterviewsAdheres to a strict script with no variation in the wording or order of the questions.
Useful when interviewer does not have experience or knowledge of the subject.
The structure helps reduce interviewer bias.
Structured Interviews
When to Use To compare responses of different
respondents
You or other volunteers have limited knowledge of the topic
Conducting Interviews
1. Establish Purpose Why are you conducting the interview
What do you want to know
Who are you interviewing
Conducting Interviews
2. Develop Questions:Related specifically to purpose
Pilot them, are they clearly understood by others’
Conducting Interviews3. Collect the data
Who will conduct the interview(s)?
Do the interviewers need training?
When will interviews be conducted?
Where will interviews be conducted?
How will you record the interviews?Questionnaire
Notes
Tape recorder
Conducting Interviews4. Analysis and reporting
What will you do with the data?
How will you analyze it?
Who will you share the results with?
How will it be shared?
When will you share the results?
Interviewing Basic Rules
Keep the purpose of the interview in mind…always
Be yourself
Be cordial, appreciative and show respect
Dress appropriately for the setting
Interviewing Basic Rules
Conduct the interview in a comfortable place
Do not be afraid to probe
Demonstrate that you are listening
Be sensitive to cultural nuances
Practice, practice, practice…
Interview Role-PlayInstructions
1. Read the scenarios.
2. Create ONE more question. The question must relate to the purpose of the interview.
3. Identify interviewee and interviewer(s).
4. Conduct interview with interviewer(s) documenting responses
5. Review and briefly analyze documented responses
Interview Role-PlayAfter conducting the interview, discuss within your
group the following:
The type of interview introduced in the scenario
A potential location for the interview
Ethical standards considered
Probing technique(s) used
Brief summary of the data collected
Did the interview meet the intended purpose
Disadvantages
May be time consuming and costlyTraining - practice is necessary Interviewer error and/or bias can
creep inAnalysis can be difficultInterviewing takes skill
Advantages
Direct feedback from respondentYields rich, detailed data and new
insightsProbing is possible Personal interaction with respondentFlexibleOpportunity to explain or clarify
Informal ConversationAdvantages
1. Highly individualized
2. Relevant to the individual
3. May produce information or insights not originally anticipated
Disadvantages1. It is not a systematic
method
2. Different information may be collected from different people
3. Analysis can become difficult and time-consuming
Guided InterviewAdvantages
1. Data are more systematic and comprehensive
2. Tone of the interview is conversational, informal
Disadvantages1. Sticking too much to
the outline may prevent other topics from being explored
2. Analysis can become difficult and time-consuming
Structured InterviewsAdvantages
1. Useful when interviewer does not have experience or knowledge of the subject
2. May be best choice when you must rely on volunteers
3. Structure makes analysis easier than other interview techniques
Disadvantages1. Interviewer has little
flexibility within the actual interview
2. If questions are not clearly linked to the purpose, there is no guarantee the questions tap into the issues that are most relevant to the respondent