intra-community contestation in institutional development process of living ancient-village tourism...
TRANSCRIPT
Intra-community contestation in institutional development process
of living ancient-village tourism management
Wu Yunmei
outline
Introduction Community tourism (or ancient
village tourism) in new socialist countryside construction: significance, advantage and challenges
General information of Tuanshan village
Contestations and problems Discussion Conclusion
introduction
Tuanshan as world monumental heritage and national heritage of China
Contestations and problems emerge in the process of developing tourism
Problem: Tourism benefit? Cause: ununited nature of villagers? Short-e
yes of villagers?
Community tourism (or ancient village tourism) in new socialist countryside
construction: significance, advantage and challenges
Tourism in Yunnan, new socialist countryside construction, small tourist town construction
Tourism as an important approach However, tourism is double-edged sword Tourism’s influences related to the social ch
aracteristics of local community (Huse et al. 1998)
Continued…Dramatic changes in rural China
changes of principle of social classification
changes of social identity (from clan identity to national identity)
reorganize social life
Family become the basic unit of production again
Market entered Government retreat Lack of independent and res
ponsible citizen consciousness
Public social life was weakened
(Shen 2006; 2007; Xiao 2003) )
1950s, land reform andcommunal construction:
1978, household responsibility system and open-up policy:
Since rural tourism is promoted as an important approach to development,
how will tourism interact with villagers’ daily life and
existent (or changing) social institutions?
Ancient village tourism as one of rural tourism, in which tourism combines with community development firmly
Social demographic and economic aspects 245 households and 927 pe
ople totally in this village, nearly 80% villagers belong to Zhang family clan,
Over 800 are agricultural, 100 are non-agricultural (65 are retired)
0.04 hectares per capita Self-consumption, traditional
way of life Han, Yi, Hani, Dai etc
In the past: remittance from tin industry and agriculture, livestock
Now: pension, agriculture and livestock(700yuan per capita), migrant worker (and tourism)
State of tourism resources
15 well-preserved local-style dwelling houses, 3 village gates, 3 temples, and one ancestral hall, occupying 18,384.5 square meters
Architectural style of the 19th century’s countryside
Tourism management
Management committee (15 persons)
-Unclear attribute (semi-government or villagers’)
-vague rules Mao
History of tourism development In past, vicinity 1990s, China-Frence exch
ange 2000, tourism managemen
t committee 2003, raise the price and c
hange some committee members
2006, “ticket within ticket” 2007, first election
3, Problems and contestations appearing in tourism development
very low stage of development, no more than 180 thousand a year
understandard environment and infrastructure Lack of economic capitals to develop, constant del
ay of government’s project relationship between villagers and tourism manag
ement committee getting worse, and villagers lack of the consciousness of being the subject
divergence and contestations appear among villagers: resent vs eagerly pursue. Committee vs Mao
4, Discussion
Two sayings: selfish and greedy committee leaders and ununited nature; concern current benefit without longer consideration and lack of consciousness of social responsibility
4.1Tragedy of the commons 4.2 collective action and participation in touri
sm
4.1Tragedy of the commons
Tourism resource as common pool resource (Briassoulis 2002; Healy 1994; Healy 2006)
“communal approach” in China’s ancient-village tourism development (Ying 2006; Ying and Zhou 2007)
ancient-village tourism resource in China should be considered as a kind of common pool resource for villagers
These problems are ‘tragedy of the commons”
4.2 collective action and participation in tourism
Tuanshan still in the process of institution formation in tourism management
First, lack of power to organize villagers: concern about their own life and don’t see much relation between their livelihood and tourism; low heterogeneity among villagers; traditional authorities fade; government retreat
Continued…
Second, little participation in tourism: participation in benefit-sharing is disappointed; stress between much expectation and needed fund
5, Conclusion
villagers’ citizen consciousness and civil organizations are considered as cores of the success of the new socialist countryside construction (Yu 2006), but also significant impediments
systematically consider various factors influencing the institution formation and collective action
increase public activities and promote public social life, as well as enhance participation in tourism. Other factors: authority leader and capital