intro logic

21
1 INTRO LOGIC INTRO LOGIC DAY 09 DAY 09

Upload: aulii

Post on 07-Feb-2016

25 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

INTRO LOGIC. DAY 09. UNIT 2 DERIVATIONS IN SENTENTIAL LOGIC. Basic Idea. We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate (show) that a given argument form is valid by - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: INTRO LOGIC

1

INTRO LOGICINTRO LOGICDAY 09DAY 09

Page 2: INTRO LOGIC

2

UNIT 2UNIT 2DERIVATIONS INDERIVATIONS INSENTENTIAL LOGICSENTENTIAL LOGIC

Page 3: INTRO LOGIC

3

Basic IdeaBasic Idea

We start with a few argument forms,

which we presume are valid,

and we use these

to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid.

We demonstrate (show) that a given argument form is valid by

derivingderiving (deducing) its conclusion

from its premises

using a few fundamental modes of reasoning.

Page 4: INTRO LOGIC

4

Example 1 – Modus Ponens (MP)Example 1 – Modus Ponens (MP)

––––––

we can employ modus ponens (MP) to derive the conclusion from the premises.

ifif thenthen ––––––––––

PP QQ RR S––––––S

Example Argument Form

Page 5: INTRO LOGIC

5

Example 1 (continued) Example 1 (continued)

P ; PQ ; QR ; RS / SMP

QMP

RMP

S

Page 6: INTRO LOGIC

6

Example 2 – Modus Tollens (MT)Example 2 – Modus Tollens (MT)

we can employ modus tollens (MT) to derive the conclusion from the premises.

Example Argument Form

ifif thenthen not not ––––––––––not not

SR SQ RP Q––––––P

––––––

Page 7: INTRO LOGIC

7

Example 2 (continued) Example 2 (continued)

S ; RS ; QR ; PQ / PMT

RMT

QMT

P

Page 8: INTRO LOGIC

8

Example 3 – using both MP and MT Example 3 – using both MP and MT

we can employ a combination of MP and MT to derive the conclusion from the premises.

–––––––

–––––––

SR SR TP TP Q–––––––––Q

Example Argument Form

Page 9: INTRO LOGIC

9

Example 3 (continued) Example 3 (continued)

S ; RS ; R T ; P T ; P Q QMT

RMP

TMT

PMP

Q

Page 10: INTRO LOGIC

10

Derivations – How to StartDerivations – How to Start

argument : P ; PQ ; QR ; RS ; / S

1. write down premises

2. write down “:” conclusion

(1) P Pr (premise)

(2) P Q Pr

(3) Q R Pr

(4) R S Pr

(5) : S what one is trying to derive

Page 11: INTRO LOGIC

11

Derivations – How to ContinueDerivations – How to Continue

(1) P Pr

(premise)

(2) P Q Pr

(premise)

(3) Q R Pr

(premise)

(4) R S Pr

(premise)

(5) : S(goal)

(6) Q

(7) R

(8) S

1,2,MP

3,6,MP

4,7,MP

3. Apply rules, as applicable, to available lines until goal is reached.

follows from

lines 1 and 2

by modus ponens

follows from

lines 3 and 6

by modus ponens

follows from

lines 4 and 7

by modus ponens

Page 12: INTRO LOGIC

12

Derivations – How to FinishDerivations – How to Finish

4. Box and Cancel

(1) P Pr

(2) P Q Pr

(3) Q R Pr

(4) R S Pr

(5) : S

(6) Q 1,2,MP

(7) R 3,6,MP

(8) S 4,7,MP

DD Direct Derivation

Page 13: INTRO LOGIC

13

Derivation – Example 2Derivation – Example 2

argument : S ; RS ; QR ; PR ; / P

(1) S Pr

(2) R S Pr

(3) Q R Pr

(4) P Q Pr

(5) : P(6) R(7) Q(8) P

DD

1,2,MT

3,6,MT

4,7,MT

Page 14: INTRO LOGIC

14

Derivation – Example 3Derivation – Example 3

(1) S Pr

(2) R S Pr

(3) R T Pr

(4) P T Pr

(5) P Q Pr

(6) : Q(7) R(8) T(9) P(10) Q

DD

argument : S ; RS ; RT ; PT ; PQ / Q

1,2,MT

3,7,MP

4,8,MT

5,9,MP

Page 15: INTRO LOGIC

15

Initial Inference RulesInitial Inference Rules

Modus Tollens

––––––

Modus Ponens

––––––

Modus Tollendo Ponens (1)

––––––

Modus Tollendo Ponens (2)

––––––

Page 16: INTRO LOGIC

16

Examples of Modus PonensExamples of Modus Ponens

(P&Q)(P&Q) (R(RS)S)P&QP&Q–––––––––––––RRSS

PP QQPP–––––––––QQ

––––––

Page 17: INTRO LOGIC

17

Examples of Modus TollensExamples of Modus Tollens

(P&Q)(P&Q) (R(RS)S)(R(RS)S)–––––––––––––(P&Q)(P&Q)

PP QQQQ–––––––––PP

––––––

PP QQQQ–––––––––PP

valid argument

BUTNOT an example of MT

Page 18: INTRO LOGIC

18

Form versus Content/ValueForm versus Content/Value

these ten pennies are worth

are the dime and ten pennies the same?

are they the same in value?

NO

YES

actually, in a very important sense, they are not the same in value!

$2,000,000

Page 19: INTRO LOGIC

19

Examples of MTP(1)Examples of MTP(1)

(P&Q)(P&Q) (R(RS)S)(P&Q)(P&Q)–––––––––––––RRSS

PP QQPP–––––––––QQ

––––––

Page 20: INTRO LOGIC

20

Examples of MTP(2)Examples of MTP(2)

(P&Q)(P&Q) (R(RS)S)(R(RS)S)–––––––––––––P&QP&Q

PP QQQQ–––––––––PP

––––––

Page 21: INTRO LOGIC

21

THE ENDTHE END