introducing the euro in belgium
DESCRIPTION
Introducing the Euro in Belgium. JM MOTTOUL Tel: 32 -257-63699 E-mail: [email protected]. Public sector: Organization at federal level. Main principle: Each manager had the responsibility to carry out the changeover process to the euro in its own services. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
1
Introducing the Euro in Belgium
JM MOTTOUL
Tel: 32 -257-63699E-mail: [email protected]
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
2
Public sector: Organization at federal level
Main principle:
Each manager had the responsibility to carry out the changeover process to the euro in its own services
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
3
Organization at federal level
But the minister of Finance requested the public consulting office ABC to pilot a project:
to assist these managers, to monitor the progress of the changeover
program to report on it to the government
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
4
First mission : assistance
By recommending a methodology in each department with: A changeover scenario in each administration divided into projects according to a technical
criteria Regulations projects IT projects Forms projects Training projects Communication projects
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
5
Scenario = planning
To write the « history » of the changeover works
What should come first? What should come after? What could be done in a parallel way?
For instance, to adapt the rules and then the IT programs and then the forms and then to train the civil servants and then to communicate
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
6
Scenario = Planning
And then to fix dates
Each project
Could start at the earliest by ….
Should finish at the latest by ….
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
7
To fix these dates : Programming
Describing the various phases of each project
Estimating the means needed Fixing the time needed
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
8
Circular adaptation
Should the ultimate deadline of the scenario not be respected,
Then it is necessary to reduce the length of the projects and to reconsider the means bestowed to them.
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
9
Coordination
It might be that a project « a » of a scenario « i », needs the result of a project « b » of a scenario « j »
Necessity to coordinate the planning of the various scenarios Within the institution concerned Between the institutions
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
10
First Mission: assistance To facilitate the coordination : a code for
each project 2 figures for the institution 2 figures for the administration 1 figure for the scenario 1 figure for the technical criteria of the project 2 figures for the project CODE : XX/XX/X/X/XX
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
11
Illustration Code 21/07/1/2/03 =
project 3 in the sector IT within the scenario 1 of the administration 7 (customs) of the institution 21 (ministry of Finance)
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
12
First Mission : assistance
By recommending a methodology By recommending a structure to
insure: The management
The technical assistance
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
13
Structure A general coordinator in each institution
To impulse the writing and to coordinate the scenarios
Project leaders To run the projects
Technical coordinators To give uniform methodology by sector, to assist
the project leaders and the general coordinator
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
14
First Mission : assistance By recommending a methodology By recommending a structure By setting up networks
a board of general coordinators five groups with the technical
coordinators To develop methods and issue technical
recommendations To coordinate interdepartmental actions
when needed
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
15
First mission: « Assistance »Five technical groups
Forms
1 delegatefrom eachinstitution
Chairman
Laws andRules
1 delegate from eachinstitution
Chairman
IT
1 delegatefrom eachinstitution
Chairman
Training
1 delegatefrom each institution
Chairman
Co
mm
un
ica
tion
Chairman
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEPMO & the five chairmen of the technical groups
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
16
Illustration
Ministry 1
DG 1
Scen. 1
DG 2
Scen. 2
IT coordinator
Forms coordinator
Gen. Coordinator
DG DG
Ministry 2
Board of general coordinators
…… 1053 projects1053 projects
IT group
Forms group
Executive committee
Pr. 1.1 Pr. 2.1
Pr. 1.2 Pr. 2.2
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
17
Example of a IT project Phases
1. Inventory 1/3/2000 4.7852. Impact study 1/5/2000
5.5713. Analyses 1/9/2000
17.1364. Implementation and tests 1/4/2001 43.0915. Tests (integration) 1/6/2001 18.1366. Production 1/7/2001 7.1107. General repetition 31/12/2001 5.835
7 phases Deadlines IT Workload IT in men/days
> 100.000> 100.000men/daysmen/days
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
18
Phase 4: implementation
IT Application(in BEF)
Convertor
(€ -> BEF)
Convertor
(BEF -> € )
IT Application(in €)
Convertor
(BEF -> €)
Convertor
(€ -> BEF)
BEF BEF
BEF BEF
€ €
€€
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
19
Phase 7: General repetition
Testing the interfaces between the public administrations
Overall scenario : “to start this project, or at least to test it, I need the data in € coming from an other ministry”
I have to receive them (to give them) at the latest for….
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
20
General repetition
Comprehensive inventory of interfaces Very difficult to obtain!
Identification of the critical path
T3
T5
T4
T6T1
T2
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
21
Critical Path
Projects in the overall scenario for which any delay implies a delay of the ultimate deadline
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
22
Global overview
1/9/01
INV
EN
TO
RY
PR
IOTIR
ISA
TIO
N
ACCEPTATIONbetween
ADMINISTRATIONS
Organization
Planning Monitoring & reporting Closing
22/9/01 31/01/02
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
23
Contingency plans
Is is worth-while to set up contingency plans and to test them in case of failure in the adapted programs at a time when it is no longer possible to correct these one before the deadline (the € day).
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
24
Second mission: To monitor
Through: Standard scoreboards
Per project To be filled every month by each project
leader And sent to the PMO (trough the GC)
Electronic support: Excel, MS Project External audit
To check the validity of the figures
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
25
External audit
A short team (4 persons) going around in the 41 institutions on a monthly or quarterly basis according to the situation
Be sure that the data checked by the audit in the administrations are these one sent to the PMO by these administrations
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
26
Second mission : « Monitoring »
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
27
Second mission : « Monitoring »(2)
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
28
Third mission : to report
Through a report on a quarterly basis in 1999 and 2000 and a monthly basis in 2001, the last year before the ultimate deadline
PMO wrote this report to the government with full independence but after a presentation to the board of general coordinators
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
29
Third mission : « Reporting » On a monthly basis to the government Global information
Total workload (# scenarios, # projects, # man/days)
Workload still to do Workload already done Written comments ….
Information per ministry or institution Total workload (# scenarios, # projects, #
man/days) Workload still to do Workload already done Written comments ….
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
30
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
09/2000 10/2000 11/2000 12/2000 01/2001 02/2001 03/2001 04/2001 05/2001 06/2001 07/2001 08/2001 09/2001 10/2001 11/2001 12/2001
Example 1: Number of projects
Total
Started
Ended
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
31
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
09/2
000
10/2
000
11/2
000
12/2
000
01/2
001
02/2
001
03/2
001
04/2
001
05/2
001
06/2
001
07/2
001
08/2
001
09/2
001
10/2
001
11/2
001
12/2
001
Example 2: Evolution WorkloadDone
Delay
To do
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
32
Example 3: Workload to do versus workload done
secteur informatique-juillet 2001
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500charge restante en hj
%ré
alis
é
Régie Bât.
Ossom
Déf.Nat.
OnvaONEm
Aff.soc.F.M.P. Justice
Cl.Moy.
Aff.Etrang. F.A.T.
Aff.Econ.
SNCB ONSS
Inasti
Onss APL
O.N.P. INAMI
Contribut. Dir.
Trésorerie
T.V.A.
Emploi et Travail
Workload to do
% realised
IT sector
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
33
Example 4:Evaluation per ministry or institution
Code Department Situationon
31/10/2001
20 Office central d'Action sociale et culturelle
21 Ministère des Finances
22 Ministère de l'Emploi et du Travail
23 Office national de l'Emploi
24 Caisse auxiliaire de paiement des allocations de chômage
25 Pool des marins de la marine marchande
26 Institut national de recherche sur les conditions de travail
27 Ministère des Affaires sociales, de la Santé publique et de l'Environnement
28 Institut d'Expertise vétérinaire
Czech Twinning Program 24 - 25 september 2007
34
Conclusions Critical factors of success:
Initial mobilization Pressure from the authorities Think globally and act locally Let’s start at once! Accountability Audit system