introduction to integrated resource recovery center (irrc ... 1_2_waste conc… · presentation...
TRANSCRIPT
web: www.wasteconcern.org
Introduction to Integrated Resource Recovery Center (IRRC) Approach
Iftekhar Enayetullah,Co-Founder & Director
Waste Concern
National Workshop on Pro-Poor and Sustainable Solid Waste Management in Secondary Cities:
Prospects for Application of Anaerobic Digestion To Treat MSW in Indonesia
13-14, November, 2014Jakarta, Indonesia
Presentation Outline
1. Overview of Waste Sector
2. Current Practice of Waste Management in the Region
3. What is IRRC Approach
4. Examples of IRRCs from Bangladesh
5. Benefits of IRRC Approach and Its Link with Sustainable Development
www.wasteconcern.org
Waste Generation Worldwide and in Developing Countries
It is estimated that 5.2 million tons of solid waste are generated daily worldwide,of which 3.8 million tons are from developing countries.
5.2 million tons/ day Worldwide
3.8 million tons/ day Developing countries.
Waste Generation
60-70% organic
www.wasteconcern.org
Composition of Raw Waste (by wet weight)
Low Income Country
Middle Income Country
High Income Country
Vegetable/Putrescible % 40 to 85 20 to 65 7 to 55
Paper and Carton % 1 to 10 15 to 40 15 to 50
Plastic % 1 to 11 2 to 13 2 to 20
Metal % 1 to 5 1 to 5 3 to 13
Glass% 1 to 10 1 to 10 4 to 10
Rubber, Misc.% 1 to 3 1 to 5 2 to 12
Fines % (sand, ash, broken, glass) 15 to 50 15 to 40 5 to 20
Other Characteristics
Moisture % 40 to 80 40 to 60 20 to 35
Density in Trucks, Kg/C.M 250 to 500 170 to 330 120 to 200
Lower Heating Value, K Cal/Kg 800 to 1100 1000 to 1500 1500 to 2700
Global Perspective on Urban Solid Waste Characteristics
www.wasteconcern.org
Source: World Bank ( 2012) “ What a waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management”
Global Perspective: Solid Waste Management Costs Versus Income
LOW INCOME COUNTRY
MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRY
HIGH INCOME COUNTRY
Average WASTE GENERATION 0.2 t/capita/y 0.3 t/capita/y 0.6 t/capita/y
Average INCOME FROM GNP 370 $/capita/y 2,400 $/ capita/y 22,000 $/ capita/y
Collection Cost 10-30 $/t. 30-70 $/m. 70-120 $/t.
Transfer Cost 3-8 $/t. 5-15 $/t. 15-20 $/t.
Sanitary Landfill Cost 3-10 $/t. 8-15 $/t. 15-50 $/t.
TOTAL COST WITHOUT TRANSFER
13-40 $/m.t. 38-85 $/t. 90-170 $/t.
TOTAL COST WITH TRANSFER 16-48 $/t. 43-100 $/t. 105-190 $/t.
Total Cost per Capita 3-10 $/capita/y 12-30 $/capita/y 60-114 $/capita/y
COST AS % OF INCOME 0.7-2.6% 0.5-1.3% 0.2-0.5%
www.wasteconcern.org
Source: World Bank ( 2012) “ What a waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management”
Disposal Costs by Alternative Technologies for Large Cities
LOW INCOME COUNTRY
MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRY
HIGH INCOME COUNTRY
Average GNP 370 $/capita/y 2,400 $/capita/y 22,000 $/capita/y
OPEN DUMPING 0.5-2 $/ 1-3 $/t 5-10 $/t
SANITARY LANDFILL 3-10 $/t 8-15 $/t 15-50 $/t
TIDAL LAND RECLAMATION 3-20 $/t 10-40 $/t 30-100 $/t
COMPOSTING 5-20 $/t 10-40 $/t 20-60 $/t
INCINERATION 40-60 $/t 30-80 $/t 70-130 $/t
Country Income Group 2010 Cost 2025 Cost
Low Income Countries $1.5 billion $7.7 billion
Lower Middle Income Countries $20.1 billion $84.1 billion
Upper Middle Income Countries $24.5 billion $63.5 billion
High Income Countries $159.3 billion $220.2 billion
Total Global Cost (US$) $205.4 billion $375 billion
www.wasteconcern.org
Source: World Bank 2013, What a Waste
Waste Bins Demountable Containers
PROBLEMS
Water PollutionSpread of Disease VectorsGreen House Gas EmissionOdor PollutionMore Land Required for Landfill
Mixed Waste
Transfer Stations
Present Situation in Developing Countries
Source of Waste
Landfill
www.wasteconcern.org
LEACHATEPolluting Ground& Surface Water
VERMINSSpreading more than
40 Diseases
METHANE GASBad Odor &Green Housegas
Current approach: waste management not resource recovery…
PROBLEMS FROM PRESENT PRACTICE
www.wasteconcern.org
Residents told to leave areas around burning Samut Prakan dump after toxic fumes detectedPROVINCIAL OFFICIALS ordered the evacuation of residents from about 1,500 homes in Samut Prakan after a fire at a local garbage dump yesterday was declared adisaster area, and toxic fumes spread to many parts of the province and nearby areas in Bangkok.
Samut Prakan, Thailand Dumpsite on Fire on Monday March 17, 2014
Strategy for Improvement (3R)
Composting/ Recycling
Avoid
Minimise
Dispose (controlled)
Dump
The Waste Management Hierarchy
Treat and Process
Dump
The Waste Management Hierarchy (Present Situation)
Dispose (controlled)
Treat and Process
Composting/ Recycling
Minimise
Avoid
www.wasteconcern.org
80% Compost
6-10% Recyclables
10-14% Non-compostable
GHG Reduced
Agriculture
CER
Local market
Landfilled
IRRC
100% Collected with user fee
House-to-house waste collection method
86% RECYCLED
Waste
EnergyBiogas Bio diesel & Glecerine RDF
What is Integrated Resource Recovery Centers (IRRCs) ?
Since 2007, the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), inpartnership with Waste Concern, has been promoting decentralized and Integrated ResourceRecovery Centers (IRRCs) in secondary cities and small towns in Asia-Pacific with the objective torecover value from waste and provide livelihood opportunities to the urban poor.
IRRC is a facility where significant portion (80-90%) of waste can be composted/recycled andprocessed in a cost effective way near the source of generation in a decentralized manner. IRRC isbased on 3 R Principle.
Waste Bins Demountable Containers
Landfill
PROBLEMS
Water PollutionSpread of Disease VectorsGreen House Gas EmissionOdor PollutionMore Land Required for Landfill
Mixed Waste
Transfer Stations
Integrated Resource Recovery Centre (IRRC)
House-to-House Collection
Vegetable Markets
House-to-House Collection
Landfill
Source Separated Waste
OPORTUNITIES
Producing Compost , Energy and Improving RecyclingReducing Green House GasReducing Cost of SWMCreating Jobs for the PoorImproving Health and EnvironmentImproving Soil Condition
Only10-14% going to landfill site
Approach of IRRCConventional Approach
Integrated Resource Recovery Centres (IRRCs)
Based on 3R principles
Recovers 80 percent of waste as resources
Promote separation at source (organic/inorganic)
Profit making
Decentralized, close to generated waste
Capacity can range from 2-20 tons/day (manual)
Uses appropriate technologies
Employs waste pickers and other urban poor
Source of Waste
Screening
Sorting
Composting
Maturing Compost
Compost
Bagging
Organic Waste Used Cooking OilRecyclablesOrganic Waste
Fish & Meat Waste
Grinding
Biogas Digester
Mixing
Biogas
Slurry
Electricity
Compost
Sorted Recyclables
Shredded, compacted and baled
Plastic
Metal
Glass
Paper
Processing Unit
Biofuel
Glycerine
Waste with high Calorific Value
Refused Derived
Fuel (RDF)
Faecal Sludge
Drying
Co-composting
with municipal organic waste
Compost
Shredded
Sorting
Extruded
www.wasteconcern.org
Organic Waste
Organic Waste
Organic Waste
Used Cooking Oil
Organic Waste (non-
compostables)
Landfill Methane (CH4) Emission
Composting (Aerobic Process)
Biogas Plant(Anaerobic Digestion)
Refused Derived Fuel (RDF)
Organic Waste
Co-composting(Aerobic Process)
Bio diesel Plant
Human Excreta
Compost (Diverted organic waste from landfill and replacing use of
chemical fertilizer )
Biogas to Electricity(replacing fossil fuel based
electricity)
Fuel in Pellet form(replacing diesel or coal used
in boilers or brick kilns)
Compost (Diverted organic waste
from landfill and replacing
use of chemical fertilizer)
Bio diesel (replacing diesel
as fossil fuel)
Baseline situation (organic waste dumped in landfill sites becomes anaerobic and generates methane)
IRRC model converts waste into resource and reducing green house gas methane (CH4)
Input Technology Produce No Methane Emission
Generates Carbon Credits by avoiding methane from Landfill and reduce CO2 to produce chemical fertilizer
Avoids methane from landfill and reduces
CO2 emission by replacing grid power
Replace use of fossil fuel
Climate Change Benefits
Avoids methane from landfill and reduces
CO2 emission by replacing grid power
Generates Carbon Credits by avoiding methane from
Landfill and reduce CO2 to produce chemical fertilizer
Baseline Situation vs. IRRC model
1 ton
Organic WasteProduce1/4 ton (0.25 tons of Compost)
Composting
1 ton
Organic Waste
Composting
Reduce 1/2 ton Green House Gas
1 ton
Organic Waste
Produce 40-80 M3 Biogas
Biogas Digester
1 liter
Used Cooking Oil
Bio diesel Plant
95% of the input as Bio diesel & Glycerine
Different Economic Outputs from IRRC
www.wasteconcern.org
1 tonInorganic Waste (high calorific value)
Refuse Derived Fuel
95% of the input Refused Derived Fuel (RDF)
Collection
Screening
Sorting
Piling
Composting
Maturing and Compost
Selling
Bagging
Sawdust
Bokashi with EM
Screening residue
Water
Marketing
Water
Example of Recycling Training Center in Katchpur, Greater Dhaka Using IRRC Approach
Technology used: Mainly Composting+ Anaerobic Digestion+ Bio Diesel Unit
www.wasteconcern.org
Collection
Screening
Sorting
Piling
Composting
Maturing and Compost
Selling
Bagging
Sawdust
Bokashi with EM
Screening residue
Water
Marketing
Water
Example of Recycling Training Center in Katchpur, Greater Dhaka Using IRRC Approach
www.wasteconcern.org
Box Method Composting Used in IRRC/RTC in Dhaka
www.wasteconcern.org
At Recycling Training Center, Katchpur, Greater Dhaka
Different Steps in Biogas Production from Organic WasteAt Recycling Training Center, Katchpur, Greater Dhaka
Item Qty. RateFiber Glass digester (4cum) 3 nos 45000Digester installation 3 nos 2500Generator(1.2 Kw) 1 no 55000
Gas flow meter 1 no. 12000Crusher/ Grinder 1 no 250000Gas Filter(For generator) 1 17000
Types of raw materials used:1. Kitchen waste ( Food waste)2. Market waste3. Vegetable waste4. Slaughterhouse waste5. Fish market waste6. Industrial waste
raw material for test:1.Kitchen waste ( Food waste) 100%2.Vegetable waste 100%3.Market waste 100%4.Kitchen waste 50% and Vegetable waste 50%5.Kitchen waste 50% and Market waste 50%6.Vegetable waste 50% Market waste 50%7. Market waste 70%, slaughter house waste15% and fish waste 15%8.Kitchen waste 70%, slaughter house waste15% and fish waste 15%9.Kitchen waste 30%, Market waste 20%, Vegetable waste 20%,10. Slaughter house waste10%, fish waste 10%, Industrial waste 10%
Different Out puts from Biogas Digester
Gas Filter Generator Electricity
Fertilizer
Biogas for Cooking
At Recycling Training Center, Katchpur, Greater Dhaka
Bio- Diesel Plant at IRRC/RTC in Bangladesh
Example from Recycling Training Center in Katchpur, Greater Dhaka
• In order to demonstrate a faecal sludge collection and treatment model withemphasis on resource recovery and recycling as stipulated in the NationalSanitation Strategy of the government, in November 2012, a pilot project wasinitiated in Kushtia a secondary town in Bangladesh to treat the faecal sludge andsolid waste together.
IRRC in Kushtia Bangladesh ( Recycling Municipal Solid Waste & Faecal Sludge from Septic Tank and Pit Latrines)
www.wasteconcern.org
Co-Composting of Municipal Waste and Faecal Sludge in IRRC : Example of Kushtia Municipality
• Total amount of municipal solid waste brought to the plant amounts to 3 to 3.5 tons/ day.
• Under this project, faecal sludge is directly collected from the septic tanks or pit latrines of households using mechanical vacuum-tugs.
• Total amount of faecal sludge collected per day is between 2-6 cubic meter/day.
• The collected sludge is directly sent to the treatment facility.
www.wasteconcern.org
Site Plan of the Co-composting Facility, Kushtia
Co-Composting of Municipal Waste and Faecal Sludge in IRRC : Example of Kushtia Municipality
2
1
3
4
2
4
4
1
3
www.wasteconcern.org
Co-composting of Faecal Sludge with Organic Waste, Kushtia City
Faecal Sludge Collected by Vaccu-Tug and Discharged in the Drying Bed and later Co-composted with organic waste to Produce Compost
To treat one ton of waste in an IRRC:
150 – 200 sqm. of land for composting;
USD 15,000– 20,000 of capital investment(without land) for composting
USD 18,000-22,000 of capital investment ( without land) for Anaerobic Digestion
10 % – 25 % of capital cost as operational costs
Trained workforce
Inputs required to build and operate IRRCs
For biodiesel plant USD 37,000 of capital investment is required for treating 1000 liter of waste cooking oil
By recycling one ton of waste:
Create 2 new jobs for the waste pickers;
Produce 0.25 tons of good quality compost;
Produce 40-80 cubic meter of biogas ( clean energy which can be used for cooking purpose or electricity generation)
Save 1.1 cubic meter of landfill area;
Reduce 0.5 tons of green house gas emissions
Provide door-to-door service to 2,000-3,000 households
Environmental, Economic & Social Benefits from IRRCs
www.wasteconcern.org
Environmental, Economic & Social Benefits from IRRCs
By recycling 1 (one) ton of waste:
Avoid between 0.2-0.3 cubic meter of toxic waste water;
Reduce the risk of 40 diseases linked with unmanaged municipal solid waste;
Increase crop production between 25-30% and reduce use of chemical fertilizer by 35-40% increasing food security;
Contribute to both climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Reduces risk of fire at landfills
www.wasteconcern.org
Sectors of Benefits Co-benefits Equivalent to US $
Social Benefits Creation of New Jobs 8.50
Reduce the risk of diseases Not yet calculated
Citizens benefit from improved waste collection Not yet calculated
Economic Benefits Good quality compost Avoided use of chemical fertilizer
Avoided use of chemical fertilizer 17
Avoidance of landfill cost 10
Value of avoided irrigation Not yet calculated
Environmental Benefits
Avoided polluted waste water Not yet calculated
Increased crop yield 64
Total 99.50
Potential Co-benefits by Reducing 1 (One) Ton of CO2e
Partially added co-benefits in US$ from reduction of 1 (one) ton of CO2e
Source: Waste Concern 2014 ( Based on the Data Collected from IRRC in Dhaka, Bangladesh) UNFCCC presentation, Bonn 2014
Public SectorPrivate SectorCitizenNGOs/CBOs/INGOsInformal SectorFinancial Sector
Beneficiaries
URBAN-RURAL SYMBIOSIS
Urban Area
City Generating Organic Waste producing compost
Rural Area
Rural Area Producing Food and Agricultural Products
HOW?
Through Decentralized IRRCs
Public-Private-Community Partnership
Using Appropriate Technology
Using Climate Financing/NAMA
www.wasteconcern.org