introduction to irene’s talk (reminder)

10
Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder) Coincidence window 500s GWHEN group, Astropart. Phys. 35 (2011) 1-7 Ph. D Thesis of I. Di Palma (AEI) Ph. D Thesis of B. Bouhou (APC) Updates on this work: - 17 May - 20 May Clermont-Ferrand meeting (2010) - 20 Sep - 24 Sep Paris meeting (2010) - 22 Nov - 25 Nov Amsterdam meeting (2010) - 07 Feb - 10 Feb CERN meeting (2011) - 06 Jun - 10 Jun Moscow meeting (2011) Internal note: ANTARES-PHYS-2011-003 wiki page: http://antares.in2p3.fr/internal/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=li The selection criteria follow G. Halladjian’s strategy Optimization for (steady) PS E -2 Unblinding granted before summer 2010 (Referee: Aart Heijboer) 2007 analysis’ scheme (triggered search)

Upload: melissa-rosales

Post on 30-Dec-2015

28 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder). The 2007 analysis’ scheme (triggered search). Ph. D Thesis of B. Bouhou (APC). Updates on this work: - 17 May - 20 May Clermont-Ferrand meeting (2010) - 20 Sep - 24 Sep Paris meeting (2010) - 22 Nov - 25 Nov Amsterdam meeting (2010) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder)

Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder)

Coincidence window 500s GWHEN group, Astropart. Phys. 35 (2011) 1-7

Ph. D Thesis of I. Di Palma (AEI)

Ph. D Thesis of B. Bouhou (APC) Updates on this work:

- 17 May - 20 May Clermont-Ferrand meeting (2010)

- 20 Sep - 24 Sep Paris meeting (2010)

- 22 Nov - 25 Nov Amsterdam meeting (2010)

- 07 Feb - 10 Feb CERN meeting (2011)

- 06 Jun - 10 Jun Moscow meeting (2011)

Internal note: ANTARES-PHYS-2011-003

wiki page:

http://antares.in2p3.fr/internal/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=link

Updates on this work:

- 17 May - 20 May Clermont-Ferrand meeting (2010)

- 20 Sep - 24 Sep Paris meeting (2010)

- 22 Nov - 25 Nov Amsterdam meeting (2010)

- 07 Feb - 10 Feb CERN meeting (2011)

- 06 Jun - 10 Jun Moscow meeting (2011)

Internal note: ANTARES-PHYS-2011-003

wiki page:

http://antares.in2p3.fr/internal/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=link

The selection criteria followG. Halladjian’s strategy

Optimization for (steady) PS E-2

Unblinding granted before summer 2010(Referee: Aart Heijboer)

The 2007 analysis’ scheme (triggered search)The 2007 analysis’ scheme (triggered search)

Page 2: Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder)

Data and MC samples

lifetime of the selected data sample: 103.281 days (37.8 days for 10pe and 65.5 days for 3pe high threshold)

Data sample The coincident period of 5L/S5/VSR1 is between January 27th and September 30th, 2007

Simulation package: Genhen, weight : Bartol flux

energy range between 10 GeV and 107 GeV

Simulation package : Corsika, weight : Battistoni’s parameterization

Atmospheric neutrinos :

Atmospheric muons:

Simulation package: Genhen

weighted with a E-2 energy spectrum

Data and MC sample are reconstructed with the BBfit reconstruction package (v3r6)

Cosmic neutrinos :

MC sample

Page 3: Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder)

Better angular accuracy than if taking random track solution Smaller search box for GW detectors

Two possible tracks(Mirror solution)

Two possible azimuth values (Same zenith)

●●

●●

Track 1

Track 2

Detector line

Reconstruction used

• Events reconstructed with 2 lines

== Due to simplified detector geometry ==

• The version of the reconstruction offers the possibility to get the azimuth of the mirror solution in the case of events reconstructed with two lines

Page 4: Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder)

Cut optimizationCut are applied to maximize the discovery potential in search for E-2 point sourcesOnly up-going events are considered.Method : test statistics LR to get optimum nsig

Different values of track and bright point 2 for different zenith angles are tested 70 possible combinations

G. Halladjian, Ph. D, University Marseilles, Dec 2010

Page 5: Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder)

Chosen cuts (up-going events)• b2 >2.2 (reduced contamination ofatmospheric muons)• t2 <=1.8 for zenith<80° • t2 <=1.4 for 80°<zenith<90°

• 20% contamination from atmosphericmuons

for zenith<80°

for 80°<zenith<90°

Page 6: Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder)

Angular search window

βμ

ν

The space angle β between the true neutrino direction and the reconstructed muon direction (E-2 spectrum) defines the angular accuracy

The angular search window is defined as 50% quantile ( or 90% quantile ) of the β distribution in bins of reconstructed declination (10°) and number of hits

90% quantile

nhit=7

Log-normal (instead of Fisher) distributions are fitted and provided for processing with X-pipeline (weight the scan directions inside the angular window)

θ is the location parameter

m is the scale parameterσ is the shape parameter

Page 7: Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder)

The HEN candidate list time Dec(°) RA (°) lines hits ASW(50%) ASW(90%) weight

….

….

• 18 events reconstructed with 3 lines and more.• 198 events reconstructed with exactly two lines : 2 solutions• Total number of events ( 18 + 2*198 )

Page 8: Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder)

Spare

Page 9: Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder)

Coincidence window

Fig. 1.  (a) active central engine before the relativistic jet has broken out of the stellar envelope; (b) active central engine with the relativistic jet broken out of the envelope; (c) delay between the onset of the precursor and the main burst; (d) duration corresponding to 90% of GeV photon emission; (e) time span of central engine activity.

Based on BATSE T90’sAnd FERMI-LAT data

Collapsar modelTime to break out envelope

Opaque to ’s

Precursors were observed for ~15% of GRBs (long and short (8%)) Emission mechanisms might be that of prompt GRBs same model

PrecursorUpper bound for BATSE

GWHEN group, Astropart. Phys. 35 (2011) 1-7

Page 10: Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder)

Angular search window

βμ

ν

The error β on the neutrino direction is defined as the angular difference between the true neutrino direction and the reconstructed muon direction (E-2 spectrum)

The angular search window is defined as 50% quantile ( or 90% quantile ) of the β distribution in bins of reconstructed declination (10°) and number of hits

ASW 50% ASW 90% used for GW+HEN search