IR analysis for HBr,E0,V(m+4),V(m+5)

https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PPT-210912ak.ppt

Energy difference for H79Br

J' E(E0-V(m+4)) E(V(m+5)-E0)0 110.8 447.81 119.3 441.22 133.4 425.43 155.1 405.64 184.6 375.0095 219.3 333.526 266 302.2497 322.3 266*8 379 235*9 438.8 200*

C:\Documents and Settings\kennari\My Documents\Dropbox\REMPI\From Long\HCl EvsV paper\Graphs and tables

J’ E0 V(m+4) V(m+5)

0 77940.8 77830.2 78388.8

1 77956 77836.40036 78396.90036

2 77986.79 77853.69312 78412.49312

3 78033.16 77878.06234 78438.76234

4 78095.28 77910.28414 78469.89314

5 78173.13 77953.92664 78506.74664

6 78266.55 78000.15004 78568.39904

7 78375.01 78052.30654

8 78498.14 78119.54039

9 78633.99 78195.08787

Energy level

C:\Documents and Settings\kennari\My Documents\Dropbox\REMPI\From Long\HCl EvsV paper\Graphs and tables

https://notendur.hi.is//~jil3/work/HBr/H+%20HBr+%20Intensity%20ratio.pdf

J’79Br/H79Br

Lorentzerr

0 0.184306 0.050741

1 0.235326 0.01941

2 0.223628 0.00658

3 0.206655 0.003811

4 0.194449 0.002961

5 0.174378 0.002695

6 0.180262 0.002976

7 0.180051 0.00363

8 0.172899 0.006069

9 0.295534 0.04294

J’ 79Br/H79Br Gauss err

0 0.17151745 0.067497

1 0.251485153 0.039878

2 0.216297178 0.007494

3 0.203290844 0.004931

4 0.190338322 0.004036

5 0.173279687 0.003823

6 0.18006178 0.004252

7 0.180985532 0.005291

8 0.171468231 0.008916

9 0.364081064 0.096019

IR values:

C:\Documents and Settings\kennari\My Documents\Dropbox\REMPI\From Long\HCl EvsV paper\Graphs and tables

HBr, E0, V(m+4),V(m+5) IR(J´=9) W1 w2 a g chisq

0.17 22.2 9.39 1.95 0.04 0.0001560.18 21.1 18 2.36 0.032 0.0001440.19 14.92 16.29 5.3238 0.013616 0.000176

0.2 21 26.35 2.74 0.025 0.000260.21 22.995 31.787 2.3889 0.0276 0.000390.22 21.69 32.224 2.8821 0.021 0.000570.23 21.7 34.1 3.04 0.019 0.000790.24 0.25 23.44 39.9 2.83 0.018 0.001370.26 24 42.1 2.82 0.017 0.001730.27 0.29 25.156 47.244 2.86 0.013 0.003

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

Deviation = 0.0057357w1 = 21.002cm-1w2 = 26.353cm-1a = 2.7461r = 0.025286d = 1

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

Deviation = 0.0046953w1 = 14.92cm-1w2 = 16.29cm-1a = 5.3238r = 0.013616d = 1

https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xls

https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

Deviation = 0.0084472w1 = 21.689cm-1w2 = 32.224cm-1a = 2.8821r = 0.021494d = 1

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

Deviation = 0.0070381w1 = 22.995cm-1w2 = 31.787cm-1a = 2.3889r = 0.027632d = 1

HBr, E0, V(m+4),V(m+5) IR(J´=9) W1 w2 a g chisq

0.17 22.2 9.39 1.95 0.04 0.0001560.18 21.1 18 2.36 0.032 0.0001440.19 14.92 16.29 5.3238 0.013616 0.000176

0.2 21 26.35 2.74 0.025 0.000260.21 22.995 31.787 2.3889 0.0276 0.000390.22 21.69 32.224 2.8821 0.021 0.000570.23 21.7 34.1 3.04 0.019 0.000790.24 0.25 23.44 39.9 2.83 0.018 0.001370.26 24 42.1 2.82 0.017 0.001730.27 0.29 25.156 47.244 2.86 0.013 0.003

https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xls

https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp

100

80

60

40

20

70605040302010

0.0

08

0.0

07

0.0

06

0.0

05

0.0

04

0.0

03

0.0

02

0.001

0

-0.001 -0.002

-0.003 -0.004

-0.005 -0.006

Points for 0 < D1 < 0.001-for W2 W3

D1(z-axis/out of plane axis)

https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912aka.pxp; Lay: 1, Gr:0

Points for Above (AK analysi)

100

80

60

40

20

70605040302010

0.0

08

0.0

07

0.0

06

0.0

05

0.0

04

0.0

03

0.0

02

0.001

0

-0.001 -0.002

-0.003 -0.004

-0.005 -0.006

Points for Above (JL analysis)

W2=49.8,W3=87.7:

https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912aka.pxp; Lay: 1, Gr:0

The difference between AK and JL could be because of differen initial Values for WL and WH(?)

IR(J´=9) WL WH a g chisq g error

0.25 20 45 1.81 0.037 0.0038 0.025 0<D1<0.003 blue: fixed

0.25 30 65 0.74 0.095 0.0035 0.056 0<D1<0.002 blue: fixed

0.25 40 77 0.51 0.129 0.0022 0.055 0<D1<0.001 blue: fixed

0.25 50 88 0.293 0.236 0.0015 0.07 0<D1<0.000 blue: fixed

0.27 20 45 2.36 0.0250.0041

9 less 0<D1<0.001 blue: fixed

0.27 30 65 0.956 0.065 0.0038 0.036 0<D1<0.003 blue: fixed

0.27 40 77 0.6 0.095 0.0024 less 0<D1<0.002 blue: fixed

0.27 50 88 0.344 0.187 0.0018 0.058 0<D1<0.004 blue: fixed

0.29 20 45 2.9 0.0174 0.0047 0.0111 0<D1<0.005 blue: fixed

0.29 30 65 1.17 0.0467 0.0043 0.026 0<D1<0.006 blue: fixed

0.29 40 77 0.738 0.0713 0.0029 0.03 0<D1<0.007 blue: fixed

0.29 50 88 0.396 0.1515 0.0025 0.05 0<D1<0.008 blue: fixed

https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xls

This suggests that WL & WH are high (ca. WL=50, WH = 88)i.e. chisq lowers as WL and WH increase and that >0 ( error < value)

Now let´s look at E(J´) and dE(J´) for the V states:See slides 2 and 3 above.

500

400

300

200

100

0

86420

E(J´) (V(m+5))

E(J´) (V(m+4))

J´

E(J´)

https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:1, Gr:0

E(J´) (V(m+5))Predictions by JL

?

J´=7: 273 instead of 266 J´=8: 250 instead of 235 J´=9: 230 instead of 200

?

Guess

This turns out to be no better!

500

400

300

200

100

0

86420

E(J´) (V(m+5))

E(J´) (V(m+4))

J´

E(J´)

https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:1, Gr:0

E(J´) (V(m+5))Predictions by JL

??

500

400

300

200

100

0

86420

E(J´) (V(m+5))

E(J´) (V(m+4))

J´

E(J´)

https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:1, Gr:0

E(J´) (V(m+5))Predictions by JL

?

GuessFortesting

?

This turns out to be no better!

J´=7: 243 instead of 266 J´=8: 196 instead of 235 J´=9: 145 instead of 200

ERGO: JL´s guess turns out to be reasonably good!

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

8642

E(J´,J´-1)

E(J´,J´-1)V(m+5)

E(J´,J´-1)V(m+4)

J´

https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:2, Gr:1