issue 2007-i075

9
Issue 2007-I075 Non-CSA CR sends MVO with bypass CSA Flag

Upload: twila

Post on 15-Jan-2016

17 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Issue 2007-I075. Non-CSA CR sends MVO with bypass CSA Flag. Issue. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Issue 2007-I075

Issue 2007-I075

Non-CSA CR sends MVO with bypass CSA Flag

Page 2: Issue 2007-I075

Issue Non-CSA CR submits a MVO with the bypass

CSA Flag, resulting in CSA CR never knowing the ESIID is not active. CSA premise management company is left with a Unit with no power and may incur charges for permits in the hundreds of Dollars.

Page 3: Issue 2007-I075

Data for Comparison1/29/08 – 1/31/08 and 2/26/08 – 02/28/08

1/29/08 – 1/31/08 02/26/08 – 02/28/08

Count Percentage Count Percentage

Total MVOs Accepted

16,762 17,002

MVOs without flag

15,208 90.73% 15,585 91.67%

MVOs with flag from CSA CR

608 3.63% 650 3.82%

MVOs with flag and no CSA CR

872 5.20% 746 4.39%

MVOs with flag from another CR

74 .44% 21 .12%

Page 4: Issue 2007-I075

Data for Comparison1/29/08 – 1/31/08 and 2/26/08 – 02/28/08

01/29/08 – 01/31/08 02/26/08 – 02/28/08

Count Percentage Count Percentage

Total MVOs submitted with bypass flag 1,554 1,417

MVOs with flag from CSA CR

608 39.12% 650 45.87%

MVOs with flag and no CSA CR 872 56.11% 746 52.65%

MVOs with flag from another CR 74 4.76% 21 1.48%

Page 5: Issue 2007-I075

Data for 02/13/08 – 03/23/08Count Percentage

Total MVOs Accepted

143,217MVOs without flag

128,353 89.62%MVOs with flag from CSA CR 6,261 4.37%MVOs with flag and no CSA CR 8,007 5.59%MVOs with flag from another CR 596 .42%

Page 6: Issue 2007-I075

Data for 02/13/08 – 03/23/08

Count Percentage

Total MVOs submitted with bypass flag 14,864MVOs with flag from CSA CR 6,261 42.12%MVOs with flag and no CSA CR 8,007 53.87%MVOs with flag from another CR 596 4.01%

Page 7: Issue 2007-I075

MVOs with flag from another CR

479

35

33

138 7 21

CR A

CR B

CR C

CR D

CR E

CR F

Remaining CRs

Remaining CRs contains

3 CRs who sent 4

1 CR who sent 2

7 CRs who sent 1

Page 8: Issue 2007-I075

Discussion It was noticed that in some instances Delete

CSA notifications may have been overlooked For example:

CR A was the current Rep of Record CR A was the current CSA. CR B submitted the 814_18 add CSA which was

accepted and ERCOT sent the current CSA the 814_18 Delete CSA notification

A week or so after the new CSA was established, the current CR submitted a MVO with the bypass CSA flag bypassing the CSA (from CR B)

Page 9: Issue 2007-I075

Next steps

Where do we go from here?