issues in cross-border power delivery and infrastructure
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ISSUES IN CROSS – BORDER POWER
DELIVERY AND INFRASRUCTURE
Engr. A. S. A. BADA
Executive Director (System
Operation), TCN
![Page 2: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
CROSS – BORDER POWER DELIVERY
OBJECTIVES:
• To facilitate the export of power from countries with comparative advantage of energy resources to those with less advantage.
• Promotion of Regional Market (Optimization of resources use).
• To facilitate Economic Development and Social Integration in the sprit of ECOWAS protocols.
![Page 3: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
WEST AFRICA EXAMPLE:
Historical perspective
�In 1982, ECOWAS Heads of States and Government by Decision A/DEC.3/5/82 adopted a regional energy policy;
�In 1999, ECOWAS Heads of States and Government, by Decision A/DEC.5/12/99 established a regional electricity
3
Decision A/DEC.5/12/99 established a regional electricity market, the West African Power Pool (WAPP) and mandated Energy Ministers and the Chief Executive of Utilities to develop the Pool;
�In 2000, Energy Ministers signed a Memorandum of Understanding (WAPP MOU) on defining terms and conditions of the implementation of the Master Plan;
![Page 4: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Historical Perspective �In 2001, Electricity Utility Companies signed a Memorandum of
Understanding in which they agree to co-operate fully with the ECOWAS Secretariat for the implementation of the WAPP;
�In 2001, ECOWAS Heads of State and Government adopt Decision A/DEC.8/12/01 relating to the financing mechanism to implement the WAPP priority projects;
4
implement the WAPP priority projects;
�In 2003, ECOWAS Heads of States and Governments:
�adopted the ECOWAS Energy Protocol by Decision A/DEC.17/01/03;
�created the ECOWAS Energy Observatory by Decision A/DEC.2/01/03;
![Page 5: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Historical Perspective
�In 2006, ECOWAS Heads of State and Government adopted
Decision A/DEC. 18/01/06 relating to the Articles of Agreement
for the establishment and functioning of the West African Power
Pool.
�In 2006, ECOWAS Heads of State and Government adopted
Decision A/DEC. 20/01/06 granting the status of “Specialised
Institution of ECOWAS” to the West African Power Pool.
![Page 6: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
HIGH VOLTAGE CROSS – BORDER POWER
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
� In the year 1972, Nigeria signed an interconnection agreement with
Niger Republic for the supply of electricity to begin cross border
trading at the following voltage levels;
�132kv between Birnin Kebbi and Niamey
6
�132kv between Birnin Kebbi and Niamey
�132kV between Katsina to Gazoua and Maradi
�33kV between Birnin Kebbi to Gaya (Niger Republic) and
Malanville ( Benin Republic)
�33kV between Maiduguri to Diffa.
![Page 7: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
� WAPP Interconnection and power trades between Nigeria,
Benin, Togo, Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire by a 330 kV coastal
corridor;
�In the year, 1997, PHCN (then NEPA) entered into an
interconnection agreement with Communate Electrique du interconnection agreement with Communate Electrique du
Benin (CEB) for the supply of power to Benin/Togo with the
construction of 330kV line from Ikeja-West (Nigeria) to
Sakete (Benin Republic)
�Commercial operations commenced in the year 2007 with
the supply of 75MW of electricity from Ikeja-West to Sakete
and Lome (Togo republic).
![Page 8: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
� WAPP had also proposed the North Core 330kV interconnection project which was agreed upon between Nigeria, Niger, Benin/Togo and Burkino Faso on 29th
June, 2004. Thereafter, a feasibility studies was carried out in 2008 and recently reviewed in Niamey;
� This involves the construction of a 330kV DC line from Birnin Kebbi (Nigeria ) – Niamey (Niger) –from Birnin Kebbi (Nigeria ) – Niamey (Niger) –Bembereke (Benin) – Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso).
� The member utilities of the four countries funded the studies which is expected to be handed over to WAPP for Donor- Funding and execution of the project.
![Page 9: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
� The West Coast Interconnection project is to extend the 330kV Ikeja west – Sakete line thereby linking Benin - Togo with Ghana and Cote D’ Ivoire by the end of 2011
�WAPP intends to consolidate and develop Côte d’Ivoire as a hub, linking Burkina Faso and Mali.
�Cote D’Ivoire will also be linked to Guinea, Guinea-�Cote D’Ivoire will also be linked to Guinea, Guinea-
Bissau, Gambia and Senegal with new hydro projects at
Kaléta and Sambangalou.
� Finally by the year 2020, WAPP is to consolidate the
development of 2nd generation link from Cote D’ Ivoire to
Sierra Leone.
![Page 10: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
WAPP: POWER INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
OMVS
OMVS
NIGERMALI
Interconnections in service
Interconnections in service 2004-11Possible future interconnections by 2020
OMVS
10
OMVS
NIGERIA
BENIN
TOGO
SENEGAL
THE
GAMBIA
GUINEA
BISSAU
LIBERIA
GUINEA
GHANA
BURKINA
FASO
SIERRA
LEONECÔTE
D’IVOIRE
omvgomvg
![Page 11: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
OTHER RELATED ISSUES
�Operation, Planning And Standards;
�WAPP in conjunction with member utilities are responsible for proper planning as it affects the interconnections.
�Technical issues such as frequency and voltage control are still factors responsible for a non -unified grid structure for the countries so far connected.
�Maintenance of standards is a key issue which WAPP is monitoring for the interconnected utilities.
�Grid codes for the member utilities to be enforced with WAPP responsibility to ensure safe operations of the interconnections.
![Page 12: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
� Commercial/Technical Issues:
� A joint technical/commercial committee between PHCN and
other utilities meet regularly to sort out interconnection and
financial matters.
� Nigeria tries to maintain steady supply to the interconnected
counties in line with the agreements signed even under system
emergencies.
� The utilities of the interconnected countries have been very
prompt in the settlement of their financial obligations to PHCN
with regards to the energy consumed.
� So far there is no disputes between the member countries on
all issues of interconnection.
![Page 13: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
� Human Capacity / Communication;
� Issues affecting operations are indirectly connected to
comunications problems caused by both human and equipment
factorsfactors
� There is need for effective communication by addressing the
language barriers between operators at the border points.
![Page 14: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
WAY OUT
1. Formation of coordinating centre as in WAPP to address
some of the issues identified.
2. Development of Planning and Operational Criteria, code
and standards for uniform adoption by all interconnected
utilities.
![Page 15: Issues in Cross-Border Power Delivery and Infrastructure](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080209/5475c3fcb4af9fb90a8b5d48/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
THANK YOU FOR YOUR THANK YOU FOR YOUR
ATTENTION