january 2013 – may 2014 energy conservation program board update san bernardino community college...
TRANSCRIPT
January 2013 – May 2014
Energy Conservation Program Board Update
San Bernardino Community College District
Insert Organization Logo Here
San Bernardino Community College District
Energy Savings To Date:
$945,258
20%17 months into energy program
* Dollar savings figure includes QuickStart period, June 2012 – December 2012.Performance Period is January 2013 – May 2014.
San Bernardino Community College District
Projected Energy Savings At The End Of The Year:
$1,430,000
Energy Cost AnalysisJanuary 2013 – May 2014
Expected Energy Cost
• Amount organization would have spent on energy without energy program
• Base year usage adjusted for changes in weather, energy loads and prices
Program Savings
• Program implementation resulting in behavior changes
• Cenergistic training and support• Reductions in equipment run
times
Actual Energy Cost
• Actual energy costs for electricity, water, sewer, and gas as a result of energy program
Expected Energy Cost $5,585,534
Actual Cost $4,640,276
Program Savings $945,258
Savings Percentage 20%
Energy Program Success
Success Factors
1. Teamwork — All organization personnel
2. Data analysis — Energy Specialist
3. On-site training and expertise — Cenergistic
4. Comprehensive facility audits — Expert identification of energy conservation opportunities throughout system facilities
Program Benefits and Features
1. Budget — Dollars retained for educational purposes
2. Environmental — Conservation of natural resources
3. Self-funding program — Conservation activities generate savings which pay for the program
4. Longevity — Program designed to be ongoing, with free support from Cenergistic after paid contract term
Projected vs Actual Savings
$574
$734
$632
$696
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
Th
ou
sa
nd
s o
f D
olla
rs
Year 1 Year 2
Projected Savings Actual Savings
*January – May of Year 2 is actual data. The rest of
Year 2 is projected based on historical comparisons.
Guaranteed vs Actual Savings
$107
$734
$408
$696
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
Th
ou
sa
nd
s o
f D
olla
rs
Year 1 Year 2
Guaranteed Savings Actual Savings
*January – May of Year 2 is actual data. The rest of
Year 2 is projected based on historical comparisons.
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
11000
Th
ou
san
ds
of
Do
llars
Nov.12 Dec.13 Dec.14 Dec.15 Dec.16 Dec.17 Dec.18 Dec.19 Dec.20 Dec.21 Dec.22
Program Costs
Program Savings
10-Year Projected Savings
Gross savings to date:• $945,258• 20%
Projected net savings:• December 2022• $7,751,000
Continued Program Success With Cenergistic Support
23,687 MMBTUs Energy Reduction,
Equivalent to one of the following:
Greenhouse gas reduction (metric tons) CO2 1,483
Tree seedlings planted, grown for 10 yrs 38,020
Passenger cars not driven one year 309
Energy Program Environmental Impact
ENERGY STAR®
.
ENERGY STAR Partner since 2013
We are committed to high standards in energy conservation.
Demonstrates our good stewardship of our environment.
Validation of our energy program at the national level.
A Day in the Life of an Energy Specialist
Perform 20-25 unoccupied and occupied audits
per week – over 400 audits to date
One-on-one training with Cenergistic staff
100 visits from Cenergistic Engineers and Consultants to date
Program EMS/recalibrate thermostats and work with Maintenance Team
Match conditioning times to occupied times
Strategic planning for extended breaks
Communication to faculty and staff
Promote an “energy conservation culture”
Continually assess and reassess the program
The Future of Our Energy Program
EMS Training at National Training Conference
Prepare for holiday shutdown to achieve greater savings
Continue developing an “energy conservation culture”
Teamwork
The success of the program depends on everyone!
Special thanks go to:
Board of Trustees/Chancellor for proactively implementing our
program
Community for supporting our energy program
VPs/Maintenance Staff for executing changes in the heating and
cooling systems
Custodians for setting back each night
Faculty for reducing energy waste in their classrooms
Deans and Staff for coordinating efforts in their schools