jean e. goforth 21 cons/lgczb
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Jean E. Goforth21 CONS/LGCZBPeterson AFB CO
AIR FORCE SPACE COMMAND
UTILITY PRIVATIZATION
Introduction to
Federal Contracting
For Utilities Privatization (UP)
29 Sep 2004
HQ AFSPC/CECO 2
Overview
The Process Milestones Source Selection Assistance Procurement Integrity Conclusion Questions
SAF/IEI
SPONSORING MAJCOM
AF/ILE
AFCESA/AFCEE
PROJECT BASES
AF MANAGEMENT CONCEPT:
• AIR STAFF DIRECTION
• MAJCOM IMPLEMENTATION
OVERSIGHT
DIRECTION
DIRECTION
TECH SUPPORT
ROLES/RESPONSIBILITIES
MAJCOMs/BASES Identify Needs
Implement Program
Follow Policy, Criteria, Procedures
Feedback
AF/ILEX Advocacy, Policy/Program
Oversight
Guidance /Information
AFCESA Technical Support
Contract Support
AFCEE
Environmental Support
SAF/IEI Approval
Notify Congress
The Process -- UP Management Concept
INFORMATION
CONGRESS
NOTIFICATION
DIRECTION INFORMATION
OSD
HQ AFSPC/CECO 4
The Process – OSD DirectedThe Process – OSD Directed
• UP PROCESS:• Request for Information/Request for Interested Sources• Kick Off• Acquisition Plan Approval • Source Selection Authority Approves Source Selection Plan • RFP & Section Js Release• Pre-Proposal Conference, Site Visit, and One-On-One Exchanges• Receive Proposals (RFP Closing Date)• Evaluate Proposals• Establish Competitive Range & Conduct Discussions• Final Proposal Revision and Evaluations• SSA Decision Recommendation• AFCESA, AF/ILE, & ESG Review; Economic Analysis Cost Comparison
Certification signed; Back to SSA; Congress notified• Contract Award (includes Right of Access) Signed• Debriefings to Offerors• Transition Begins With Permits, Capital Improvements, Bill of Sale
Signed Transferring Ownership• Contract Performance Commencement
HQ AFSPC/CECO 5
MAJCOM UP
Decision
RFPClosing
EvaluationBegins
Site VisitPre-
ProposalConference
1-On-1s
Certify EconomicAnalysisResults
FPREvaluations
FinalProposalRevisions
(FPR)
CompetitiveRange
DiscussionsNegotiations
RFP Issued
To Industry
The Process -- Competitive Process
45Cumulative
60100 45 6060
120 220 280 340 400
Eve
nts
Time
PostedOn
FedBizOps
One DayPer System
Plus 2
Proposal From
OfferorTo Gov’t
ENs IssuedVerbal/Written
Discussions
FinalProposalRevisionsTo Gov’t
Package forMAJCOMDecision
Brief ESG
20
420
Pro
du
cts /
Ou
t com
e
Status of Acquisition Process briefed by MAJCOMs to ILEXO on Specified Dates
75
CongressNotificationGo/No Go
Debriefings
Milestones
•After RFP Closes:• Begin Technical Evaluations
• Complete Initial Proposal Evaluations
• Complete Evaluation Notices (ENs)
• Brief SSA on ENs
• Open Discussions/Negotiations
• Receive EN responses
• Conclude evaluations of EN responses
• Draft SSET Report
• SSAC Brief SSA on SSET Report/Competitive Range/Request for Clearance
Milestones
•After RFP Closes, Continued • Request Final Proposal Revisions
• Receive Final Proposal Revisions
• Complete Final Proposal Evaluations
• SSAC Briefing – Final SSET Report
• Economic Analysis Package Certification by Wing FM
• SSAC Briefs SSA
• SSA Briefs ESG on Recommended GO/NO GO
• Contracting Congressional Notification
• If economical IAW 10 USC 2688, Contract Award
• Begin Transition Period and Obtain Permits
• Bill of Sale Executed
• Contract Performance Starts
Source Selection Roadmap
CostTechnical
Proposals
Strategy/Plan
Plan theApproach
• Requirements
Meaningful Discussions
MarketResearch
CustomersNeeds Best V
alue Process
RFP
Requirements & Criteria
EvaluateDetermine
Competitive Range
Evaluate ProposalsCompare
Debrief
ContractDecision
ProposalsBeginBest
Value • Acquisition
LessonsLearned
KeyDiscriminators
(SourceSelection
Plan)
Final Proposal Revision
Source Selection Organization--AFSPC
Source Selection Authority(SSA) –
Source Selection Advisory Council
(SSAC)
Source Selection Evaluation Team
(SSET)
Past Performance(PRAG)Risk Cost
Recorders
Mission Capabiltiy
Standing HQ team
Base Rep
AFSPC/MSExecutive Steering
Group
Areas of SSET evaluation Areas of SSET evaluation
Standing HQ Council with Base Rep(s)
Pre-RFP
RFPRelease
ProposalReceipt
CompRangeDeter
Request FPR
Award
Interim RatingBefore FinalProposal Rev (FPR)
EXCHANGES
•Req Devel•Acq Strategy•DRFPs•Conferences•One-on-one Mtgs•Market Research
•CO Responses to Questions•RFP Amendments
Exchanges (CO controls afterRFP release
•All proposals eval•Comp range deliberated•No revisions allowed•Communicate only with those uncertain if in/out CR
Communicationsfor greater understandingleading to CRD
•Now best value is goal•ENs (not CRs/DRs) issued•Proposal revisions allowed•Must discuss -significant weaknesses -deficiencies -other aspects to enhance award potential•Release Interim FPR ratings•Request FPRs
Discussions(only w/offerors in CR)
Post-AwardDebriefings
Debriefings of successfuland unsuccessful offerors. Same rating charts as shown to SSA
FPR Receipt
EXCHANGES BY CONTRACTING PHASE WITH DISCUSSIONSEXCHANGES BY CONTRACTING PHASE WITH DISCUSSIONS
Evaluation
Final Proposal Revision (FPR)• All offerors in Competitive Range given an opportunity to
revise their proposals simultaneously.
• Use a common cut off date and time to ensure a fair competitive environment
• If after receipt of final revised proposals it becomes necessary to subsequently clarify you can without any additional request for final offers from all offerors
• In unlikely case further expanded negotiations, a second final offer opportunity must be extended to all offerors
Contractor DebriefsPost Award
• Include Significant Strengths, Weaknesses, Deficiencies• Overall Evaluated Ratings for offeror and selected offeror• Redacted SSDD Slides required• Briefing Charts for offeror • Summary of Rationale for Award• Reasonable Responses to Relevant Questions• Not a Forum for Debate See AFFARS 5315.506
Offerors may not be pleased, but should Offerors may not be pleased, but should understand the reason for selection.understand the reason for selection.
HQ AFSPC/CECO 13
Assistance
Sources for Assistance:
Air Force Source Selection Policyhttp://www.safaq.hq.af.mil/contracting/index.html
• Air Force Civil Engineering Support Agencyhttp://www.afcesa.af.mil
• Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) sitehttp://farsite.hill.af.mil (All Clauses)http://www.arnet.gov/far (FAR Clauses only)
FAR Part 3.101-1 - Government business shall be conducted in a manner above reproach and, except as authorized by statute or regulation, with complete impartiality and with preferential treatment for none
All communications with offerors must come through contracting officer/specialist to ensure complete and accurate information provided and impartial treatment of offerors
Procurement Integrity
HQ AFSPC/CECO 15
Conclusion
DoD emphasis on AFSPC fully evaluating UP systems for privatization
AFSPC doing everything possible to minimize workload on Wing (Base) personnel
Success is defined as SSA decision for Competitive RFPs by 30 Sep 05
HQ AFSPC/CECO 16
Questions
Questions?