jet-met november-7-2002 g. bernardi lpnhe - paris zero-suppression & missing e t compare data...

5
Jet-Met November-7-2002 G. Berna LPNHE - Pa ero-Suppression & Missing E T Compare Data Quality with: - May data = Pre-Shutdown Data, 154k- 155k , P10.15 - June-July = Post-Shutdown Data, 157k - 160k , P11.09 + change of 0-suppression 2.5 1.5 sigma after run 158062 - August-October = Post-Mixing Data, 162k - 167k , P11.1x 11/12 Data, mid-August to end Octob

Upload: linda-manning

Post on 20-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Jet-Met November-7-2002 G. Bernardi LPNHE - Paris Zero-Suppression & Missing E T Compare Data Quality with: - May data = Pre-Shutdown Data, 154k-155k,

Jet-MetNovember-7-2002

G. Bernardi LPNHE - Paris

Zero-Suppression & Missing ET

Compare Data Quality with:- May data = Pre-Shutdown Data, 154k-155k , P10.15- June-July = Post-Shutdown Data, 157k - 160k , P11.09

+ change of 0-suppression 2.5 1.5 sigma after run 158062

-August-October = Post-Mixing Data, 162k - 167k , P11.1x

p11.11/12 Data, mid-August to end October

Page 2: Jet-Met November-7-2002 G. Bernardi LPNHE - Paris Zero-Suppression & Missing E T Compare Data Quality with: - May data = Pre-Shutdown Data, 154k-155k,

Jet-MetNovember-7-2002

G. Bernardi LPNHE - Paris

OLD: June-July vs April-May DataMajor change of average missing ET when going from 2.5 to 1.5 sigma zero- suppression cut: From 6-7 GeV to 14-18 GeV, with a wider scattering from run to run. One entry per root-tuple, data from 19th june till 9th of July.

P11.09 works fine with 2.5 sigma

Comparison with April-May Data, p10.15

Page 3: Jet-Met November-7-2002 G. Bernardi LPNHE - Paris Zero-Suppression & Missing E T Compare Data Quality with: - May data = Pre-Shutdown Data, 154k-155k,

Jet-MetNovember-7-2002

G. Bernardi LPNHE - Paris

OLD: June-July: MET Mean&RMS

Major change of average missing ET when going from 2.5 to 1.5 sigma zero- suppression cut: From 6-7 GeV to 14-18 GeV, with a wider scattering from run to run.

BUNCH MIXING?

Also true for RMS(MET)

One entry per root-tuple, data from 19th june till 9th of July.

Page 4: Jet-Met November-7-2002 G. Bernardi LPNHE - Paris Zero-Suppression & Missing E T Compare Data Quality with: - May data = Pre-Shutdown Data, 154k-155k,

Jet-MetNovember-7-2002

G. Bernardi LPNHE - Paris

Conclusions…(from 17th JULY)Presently difficult to extract useful information from the cells at low energies, due to these warm zones.

MET is affected by the lowering of zero-suppression: the analyses will have to recompute MET from cells and tune the cuts to have a similar resolution as before, until the warm zones are corrected in hardware. It seems that a very high cut is now needed to achieve it (> 500 MeV)

Probably wiser to go back to a higher threshold (2 or 2.5 sigma), at least until the problem is fixed.

Extrapolating from our experience of the comissionning, It is most important to keep cells in the thumbnail for at least a year, so this should be kept in mind when deciding which zero suppression level to use. We favor 2 sigmas, to increase slightly the signal and to avoid a too large increase of the overall noise.

Page 5: Jet-Met November-7-2002 G. Bernardi LPNHE - Paris Zero-Suppression & Missing E T Compare Data Quality with: - May data = Pre-Shutdown Data, 154k-155k,

Jet-MetNovember-7-2002

G. Bernardi LPNHE - Paris

We start after the fix of Calo bunch mixing.

Run 161972, and go up to October 31st:

Run 167191

i.e. about 15000 Files (root-tuples) 77 Million Evnts

Corresponding to a delivered LUMI: 39.6 pb-1

recorded 30.0 pb-1

Live fraction 76.0%

Presently processed over 40%, finished this w.e.

Info presented on 214 runs: 33.3 Mevts / 12.3 pb-1

p11.11/12 Data, mid-August to end October