john arthur [email protected] lusi doe review august 19, 2008 transition to operations p. 1...

John [email protected]

LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008Transition to Operations p. 1

From construction project to operating facility

Structure of the LCLS facility organization

Operations and the experiment program

Transition to Operations

John Arthur

LCLS



Steps in turning on the LCLS

TimelineAccelerator commissioningX-ray commissioning



LCLS Installation and CommissioningLCLS Installation and Commissioning

LTU

/Und

/Dum

p

LTU

/Und

/Dum

p

Inst

all

Inst

all

LTU/UndLTU/UndComm. Comm.

Re-commission Re-commission Inj/BC2 to SL2Inj/BC2 to SL2

First LightFirst Lightin FEEin FEE

PEP-I

I ru

n

PEP-I

I ru

n

ends

ends

FEE/N

EH

In

stall

FEE/N

EH

In

stall

PPS C

ert

. LT

U/D

um

pPPS C

ert

. LT

U/D

um

p

FEH

In

stall

FEH

In

stall

CD-4

CD-4

(7

/31

/201

0)

(7/3

1/2

01

0)

X-R

ays

in N

EH

X-R

ays

in N

EH

First LightFirst Lightin FEHin FEH

JJJJ FFFF MMMM AAAA MMMM JJJJ JJJJ AAAA SSSS DDDD JJJJ FFFF MMMM AAAA MMMM JJJJ JJJJ AAAA SSSS OOOO NNNN DDDD JJJJ FFFF MMMM AAAA MMMM JJJJ JJJJOONNAA

2008 2009 20102008 2009 2010 2008 2009 20102008 2009 2010DownDown

PPS

PPS

AAMM

no

wn

ow

Linac/BC2 Linac/BC2 Commissioning Commissioning FEEFEE

Comm. Comm.

FEH

Hutc

h B

OFE

H H

utc

h B

O

AMOAMOExperimeExperiment nt programprogrambeginsbegins



Accelerator Commissioning

Ground rules for transfer of new accelerator systems from construction to Accelerator Systems Div were defined in Lab Director’s memo, 12/2006

ASD SOP for control of accelerator configuration implemented from start of commissioning

Staged handover of new systemsInjector + BC-1

Commissioning: April 2007 start, November 2007 finish+ Linac through Sector 30

Commissioning: January 2008 start, April 2008 finish+ Beam Transport through Undulator and Beam Dump

January 2009 start, July 2009 finish



X-Ray Commissioning

Front End start commissioningMay 2009

Near Hall start commissioningJuly 2009

Far Hall start commissioningFebruary 2010



Organization

LCLS Directorate within SLAC

Structure of the LCLS Directorate



SLAC Organization

SLAC DirectorP. Drell

Engineering & Technical Support

L. Klaisner

OperationsA. Merola

LCLSD. Knutson

SSRLJ. Stöhr

Particle Physics & Astrophysics

S. Kahn

Photon ScienceK. Hodgson



LCLS Directorate Organization

LCLS DirectorDale Knutson

Accelerator Systems Div

John Seeman

Business DivCindy Lowe

Experimental Facilities DivJochen Schneider

Engineering Physics DivDavid Schultz

Strategic Projects DivJohn Galayda

LCLS Construction

LUSI



Operations

Budgets

Staffing plans

Operation goals



LCLS Proposed Budget

Accelerator SystemsFY2009: $ 96.7M (similar to FY08)

Experiment FacilitiesFY2009: $ 2M (new money)FY2010: $ 9M



2009

TWG RollUp_Level 1 TWG RollUp_Level 2 FTE

Labor, Shop & M&S (FY06

K$) FTE


K$)


K$) Linac Related Ops AIP 17 5,502$ 22 5,974$ 6,720$

Equipment/CEP 1,100$ 3,500$ 3,937$

GPP 2 1,800$ 6 4,500$ 5,062$

LCLS [Direct](2) 112 19,183$ 21,578$

Linac [Direct] 153 19,695$ 114 15,642$ 17,596$

PEP-II [Direct] 112 16,039$ -$

Power (1) 14,021$ 8,975$ 10,096$

Direct Program Support [Direct](3) 97 11,546$ 105 13,817$ 15,542$

Lab wide Indirects Linac(4) 89 15,795$ 79 14,395$ 16,192$

Linac Related Ops Total 472 85,497$ 438 85,986$ 96,722$

PPA Programs [Direct] 420 62,943$ 595 96,356$ 108,388$

LCLS Const'n/2nd Undulator

LCLS Const'n/2nd Undulator Total 169 68,395$ 73 25,582$ 28,776$

Total budget - DOE 1,527 293,401$ 1,940 354,975$ 399,298$

Notes:(1) The FY06 total SLAC power cost is estimated to be $17.4 million which is lower by $2.2 million because of a one-time Rate Adjustment Credit. The FY09 total SLAC power cost is estimated to be $17.5 million in FY06 dollars. (2) Lines labeled (Direct) represent direct costs only without any allocated indirect costs.(3) Costs incurred to benefit a wide range of programs/activities. These costs are not associated with a single program/activity. (4) Costs that cannot be identified with any particular activity and benefit the entire laboratory.

2006

2009

TWG RollUp_Level 1 TWG RollUp_Level 2 FTELinac Related Ops AIP 17 5,502$ 22 5,974$ 6,720$

Equipment/CEP 1,100$ 3,500$ 3,937$

GPP 2 1,800$ 6 4,500$ 5,062$

Linac Related Ops Total 472 85,497$ 438 85,986$ 96,722$

LCLS Const'n/2nd Undulator

LCLS Const'n/2nd Undulator Total 169 68,395$ 73 25,582$ 28,776$

Total budget - DOE 1,527 293,401$ 1,940 354,975$ 399,298$

Notes:(1) The FY06 total SLAC power cost is estimated to be $17.4 million which is lower by $2.2 million because of a one-time Rate Adjustment Credit. The FY09 total SLAC power cost is estimated to be $17.5 million in FY06 dollars. (2) Lines labeled (Direct) represent direct costs only without any allocated indirect costs.(3) Costs incurred to benefit a wide range of programs/activities. These costs are not associated with a single program/activity. (4) Costs that cannot be identified with any particular activity and benefit the entire laboratory.

Accelerator Systems Budget



FY09 FY10 Long term

Instrument scientists 1 4.5 24

Engineering (laser, mech, elec) 2 6 30

Development scientists 1.5 3 10

Detectors 0.5 2 3

Computer applications 2 5 12

Technicians 1 4 34

Admin 1 5 11

Totals 9 29.5 124

Photon Operations Staffing

(FTE)



Target Running Schedule

2009: AMO, SXR2010: AMO, SXR, XPP2011: AMO, SXR, XPP, CXI2012: AMO, SXR, XPP, CXI, XCSHED?

(hours of operation)



LCLS Facility in its Science Context

Advisory groups

User outreach

Access policy



LCLS Science Advisory Committee

Roger Falcone UC Berkeley, USA - ChairMassimo Altarelli European XFEL ProjectPhil Bucksbaum Stanford UniversityRobert L. Byer Stanford UniversityHans Frauenfelder LANL Wayne Hendrickson Columbia UniversityTetsuya Ishikawa RIKEN Spring-8 Center Margaret Murnane University of Colorado-BoulderFrancesco Sette ESRFSunil Sinha UCSD Dietrich von der Linde University of EssenJustin Wark Oxford UniversityC. Lewis Cocke Kansas State UniversityRobert Schoenlein LBNLPhilip Anfinrud NIHGeraldine Richmond University of Oregon



LCLS/LUSI Instrument Teams

SAC recommended scientific thrust areas, based on letters of intent to do LCLS science (250 signatories)

Thrust areas: AMO, XPP, CXI, HED, XCS, SXR

Scientists chose team leaders for each area Interface with SLAC Provide input to instrument design process

Instrument scientists in regular contact with team leadersTeam leaders review and accept instrument physics requirement documentsWorkshops have brought many team members to SLACLCLS encourages instrument team presence from start of instrument operation



Instrument Team Leaders (LUSI)

XPP (Instrument scientist: David Fritz)K. Gaffney (SLAC, leader)D. Reis (U. of MI)T. Tschentscher (DESY)J. Larsson (Lund Inst Tech)

CXI (Instrument scientist: Sebastien Boutet)J. Hajdu (SLAC + Uppsala U, leader)H. Chapman (DESY)J. Miao (UCLA)

XCS (Instrument scientist: Aymeric Robert)B. Stephenson (ANL, leader)K. Ludwig (Boston U)G. Grübel, DESY



AMO (Instrument scientist: John Bozek)L. Di Mauro (Ohio State, leader)N. Berrah (Western Michigan U)

SXR (Instrument scientist TBD)A. Nilsson (Stanford)W. Wurth (U Hamburg)

HED (Instrument scientist TBD)R. Lee (LLNL, leader)P. Heimann (LBNL)

Instrument Team Leaders (non-LUSI)



Outreach: Web (LCLS.slac.stanford.edu)



Information on LCLS instruments



User site (LCLS.slac.stanford.edu/USER/)

“Proposals for experiments using the AMO station must be submitted by September 1, 2008.”

“During 2010 it is anticipated that the spectral range of the LCLS will be extended to 8 keV. A call for proposals for XPP will be issued in early 2009.”



LCLS Users Organization

First met at 2007 LCLS Users MeetingElected an Executive Committee

A. Barty (LLNL)R. Lee (LLNL)L. Young (ANL)

First task: create charterDraft in circulation



2008 LCLS/SSRL Users Meeting

Oct 15-18, 2008



User Access Policy

All instruments are managed by LCLSEvery experiment starts with a proposalBeam time allocated primarily on scientific merit

Some time reserved for instrumentation proposalsSmall fraction reserved for Director’s discretion & in-house researchSpecial, limited-time arrangements of preference for LCLS/LUSI instrument teamGroups making significant additions of general utility to LCLS can negotiate limited-time preference



Summary

LCLS operations organization is taking shapeUser outreach is progressing wellUser policy encourages and supports widespread accessibilityLCLS is open for business



End of Presentation

john arthur [email protected] lusi doe review august 19, 2008 transition to operations p. 1...

Documents