john coggins/srp - coal-fired plants and renewables
TRANSCRIPT
John Coggins, ManagerResource Planning & Development
February 18, 2011
Can Renewables Replace Coal?
Electric Generation Terminology
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 2
Capacity
Generator capability at a moment in timeUnit of measure is “megawatt” (MW)
Energy
Generator output accumulated over a period of timeUnit of measure is “megawatt-hour” (MWh)
Energy = Capacity (MW) x Time (h)
Electric GenerationCost Categories
• Construction or capital costs– Cost to build a new generating facility
• Operating costs– Cost to operate and produce electrical energy
• Delivery costs– Cost to build transmission for delivery to
customers
• Integration costs– Cost to accommodate intermittency
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Meeting Customer Needs
NoonAM PM
Peak
Intermediate
Baseload
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 4
When available, renewables displace conventional resources
Customer Needs
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 240%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Hours of the Day
MW
Summer Load Profile
5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 240%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Hours of the Day
MW
Peak Capacity Firming - Wind
Wind Generation ProfileMedian Day
Summer Load Profile
Capacity Firming
6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 240%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Hours of the Day
MW
Peak Capacity Firming - Solar
Capacity Firming
7
Solar Generation Profile
Summer Load Profile
Regulation
Source: Jay Apt CMU, 4.6 MW TEP Solar Array (Arizona)NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 8
Integration Costs
• Peak Capacity Firming$15-34/MWh
Based on capital cost of a new gas turbine
• Regulation$4-9/MWh
Results from wind integration cost studies, 2009 Wind Technologies Market Report, U.S. Department of Energy
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 9
What about Storage?
TechnologyCapacity
MWCapital Cost
$/MWPros Cons
Flow Batteries 1-5 3.5 - 4.0Quick
responseHigh
maintenance
Lead Acid Batteries
1 3.0 - 4.0Quick
responseLimited life
cycle
Compressed Air Energy Storage
350 1.5 - 2.0Increases
gas turbine efficiency
No suitable AZ sites
Pumped Storage
500-1,000 2.0 - 3.1Quick
responseNo new AZ
sites
Frame CT 225 0.7 - 0.75 Quick start CO2
Aeroderivative CT
45-100 1.0 - 1.3 Quick start CO2
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 10
Conventional ResourcesBaseload Intermediate Peaking
Operating Characteristics
Continuous Flexible Highly Flexible
Dispatchable Yes Yes Yes
Technology Coal, Nuclear, and Natural Gas
Combined Cycle Natural Gas
Combustion Turbine Natural
Gas
Capital Costs (new capacity) Moderate-High Low-Moderate Low
Operating Costs Low Moderate High
Integration Costs
None None None
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 11
Renewable OptionsSolar PV Wind Geothermal
Operating Characteristics
Intermittent Intermittent Continuous
Dispatchable No No No*
Capital Costs High Moderate Moderate-High
Operating Costs
Low Low Low
Integration Costs
Moderate High None
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 12
* Limited Dispatchability
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 13
Generation Cost ComparisonTotal Levelized Cost
Existing Coal Wind Solar PV0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200Integration and Delivery
Base Levelized Cost
$/M
Wh
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 14
Generation Cost ComparisonTotal Levelized Cost
Existing Coal Wind Solar PV0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200Additional Environmental Costs
Integration and DeliveryBase Levelized Cost
$/M
Wh
Capacity FactorTypical Wind Resource
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 15
0%
100%
Hours
En
erg
y O
utp
ut
Capacity FactorTypical Wind Resource
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 16
0%
100%
Hours
En
erg
y O
utp
ut
28% Wind
0%
100%
Hours
En
erg
y O
utp
ut
28%
Capacity FactorWind Vs. Coal
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 17
90%
Wind
Coal
How Much Wind Capacity Is Needed To Replace NGS Energy Production?
• NGS• 2250 MW x 8760 hrs/yr x 90% CF• 17,739,000 MWh per year
• Wind Resource• 17,739,000 MWh 8760 hrs/yr 28% CF• 7232 MW of Wind
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 18
Energy = Capacity x Time x Capacity Factor
Wind - Capital Cost
• 7232 MW of Wind• Average Capital Cost: $1.54Million/MW
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 19
$1.54 Million/MW x 7232 MW = $11.1 Billion
Wind - Land Requirements
Land = 7232 MW x 158 Acres/MW
= 1.14 million acres or 1780 Sq. Miles
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 20
Wind - New Transmission Needs
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 21
Existing transmission built for 2250 MW3 new lines needed for 7232 MW of wind Est. $1.2 B costEst. 10 yr lead time
Summary – Wind Example
Capacity (MW) 2250 7232
Area (Sq. Miles) Plant + Mine 2.8 + 102 = 105 1780
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 22
Plant 1,130* 11,140
Transmission 0 1,260
Total 1,130 12,400
NGS Wind
Construction Costs ($ Millions)
* New Emission Controls
Summary – Solar PV Example
Capacity (MW) 2250 6983
Area (Sq. Miles) Plant + Mine 2.8 + 102 = 105 90
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 23
Plant 1,130* 19,930
Transmission 0 1,260
Total 1,130 21,190
NGS Solar PV
Construction Costs ($ Millions)
* New Emission Controls
Conclusions
• Intermittent renewables cannot meet operational needs
• Conventional resources are required• Renewables have high integration and
capital costs relative to existing coal• High capital costs are compounded when
building 3 times the capacity• Large land requirements• Extensive transmission requirements
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 24
So Where do Renewables Fit in?
• Renewables can supplement, but not replace, conventional resources – Reduce use of fossil fuels– Reduce emissions – Increase resource diversity– Help to decrease water consumption
• Costs for renewables (and storage) must continue to come down to expand implementation
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 25
Other Considerations
• If NGS is shut down for any reason, what resources would likely replace it?
• Where would the replacement resources be located?
• What would be the impact on the Navajo and Hopi people?
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 26
Where is Gas Generation Located in Arizona?
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 27
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 28
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 29
SRP Sustainable Portfolio
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 30
FY2006
FY2007
FY2008
FY2009
FY2010
FY2011
FY2012
FY2013
FY2014
FY2015
FY2016
FY2017
FY2018
FY2019
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
FY2024
FY20250%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Pe
rce
nt
of
Re
tail
Re
qu
ire
me
nts
Renewable Resources
Conservation - Energy Efficiency and Demand Response
Target
*Renewable and energy effi-ciency resources in excess of re-quirement will be banked for fu-ture use
Actual Projected
FY11 Resource Plan
Dry Lake Wind Phase I• Iberdrola Renewables• 63 MW• 18 miles northwest of
Snowflake, AZ, adjacent to State Route 377
• Located on a combination of private, State and BLM land
• Contract Term: 20 years• September 4, 2009
Commercial Operation
31NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11
Dry Lake Wind Phase II
• Iberdrola Renewables• 64 MW• 3 miles east of Phase I• Contract Term: 20 years• November 28, 2010
Commercial Operation
32NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11
• Energy Source• 50 MW • Imperial Valley, CA• Contract Term: 30 years
• Status:– Construction began in
June – Commercial operation
estimated Q2 2012
• SRP has rights to additional development
Hudson Ranch Geothermal Phase I
33NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11
Copper Crossing Solar PV• Iberdrola Renewables• 20 MW
– SunPower polycrystalline panels
– Single axis tracking
• Florence, AZ• Contract Term: 25
years
• Status:– Contracts executed– Construction underway– Commercial operation estimated Q3 2011
34NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11
Example SRP Facilities
• Tempe Service Center (75 kW)
• Power Operations Building (75 kW)
• Newly constructed call center in Pinal County LEED Certified (180 kW)
35NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11
City PartnershipsScottsdale Senior Center
Phoenix Pecos Park Community Center
Phoenix Pecos Park & RideU.S. Bureau of Reclamation
36NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11
Small Commercial Customer Systems
• CDC Pools– 9.2 kW system– Completed 2006
• Optima– 8 kW system– Completed 2006
• Body Sculpting Center• 29 kW system– Completed 2007
• Integrity Building Corp.– 19 kW system– Completed 2008
37NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11
Gatorade Distribution Center• Located on
Gatorade/PepsiCo distribution center in Tolleson
• 500 kW solar electric system containing 2,448 solar panels
• System spans 68,000 sq ft
• Estimated CO2 reductions of approximately 392 metric tons per year
• Operational October 2008
38NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11
• EarthWise Energy allows customers to fund solar energy projects in the community
• $3 per month
• 5,500 residential customers and 100 business customers
• New projects – Nina Mason Pulliam Rio Salado Audubon Education Center, Liberty Wildlife, Sunshine Acres Children’s Home
EarthWise Energy Desert Botanical Gardens
The Phoenix Zoo
Habitat for Humanity
39NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11
Solar for Schools • Funding from grant program
to complete installation and ten-year maintenance of solar PV systems on Valley schools
• Educational materials and educator training related to solar energy
• System will allow students to monitor energy output and use data for “real-world” math learning and application
40NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 41
NGS Stakeholder Meeting J.D. Coggins 2/18/11 42
Wind Farm’s Second Phase Is Completed And Working By Tammy Gray-Searles In late December, the second phase of Dry Lake Wind Farm was completed and quietly began operation. According to Iberdrola public relations representative Jan Johnson, the testing phase is complete and power is being sold to Salt River Project (SRP). Construction was completed slightly ahead of schedule, and the turbines began running on Dec. 22. “The weather was cooperative over the construction season,” Johnson noted. “Even the wind was cooperative and didn’t blow too hard when we needed to use the cranes.” A total of 31 Suzlon turbines were constructed at the site. They are capable of generating up to 65 megawatts. Johnson noted that the energy produced is enough to power about 9,000 “typical homes served.” According to Iberdrola Business Developer Chris Bergen, the second phase represents a $110 million investment by the company. The latest addition to the wind farm is located just west of Highway 77, about two miles north of the Snowflake town limits, or about five miles north of the start of the business district. In relation to the first phase, it is about four miles southeast of the existing set of turbines. If the two phases were mapped out as squares on a chessboard, they would be diagonal to each other, touching at one corner. Phase II encompasses approximately 10,240 acres. Completion of the second phase just more than doubles the total number of wind turbines in the project, bringing the total to 61. The first phase of the project, which included 30 turbines, was completed in August 2009. According to Johnson, the second phase adds five more full-time permanent jobs. About 200 workers were employed during the construction phase. Power from both phases is sold to SRP as part of a contract between the companies. Now that the second phase is complete, Johnson noted that Iberdrola is making plans for a third phase of construction. “It is in permitting,” she said. “We’re hoping to have additional phases.”