john flynn - transmission planning for new energy future - aep

10
Transmission Planning for a Transmission Planning for a New Energy Future New Energy Future New Energy Future New Energy Future John Flynn Managing Director - Transmission Strategy & Business Development American Electric Power Transmission Policy Institute C Magnolia Hotel Denver, Colorado June 17-18, 2010

Upload: others

Post on 08-Dec-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Transmission Planning for a Transmission Planning for a New Energy FutureNew Energy FutureNew Energy Future New Energy Future

John FlynnManaging Director - Transmission Strategy & Business Development

American Electric Power

Transmission Policy InstituteCMagnolia Hotel — Denver, Colorado

June 17-18, 2010

American Electric PowerAmerican Electric PowerRevenues (in billions) $13.5

Net Income (in millions) $1,357 1

Company OverviewCompany Overview

( ) $ ,

Earnings Per Share $2.96 1

Cash Dividends Per Share 2 $1.64

Service Territory 197,500 mi2

Transmission 39,000 miles,

Distribution 215,800 miles

Generating Capacity 38,988 MW 2

Generating Stations More than 80

Renewable Portfolio (hydro) 364 MW 3( y )

Pumped Storage 586 MW

Renewable Portfolio (wind, solar) 1,406 MW 4

Total Kilowatt-hour Sales (in millions) 195,312

Total Assets (in billions) $48.3( )

U.S. Customers (year-end, in thousands) 5,220

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

2. Represents nominal capacity; includes 270 MW of mothballed / decommissioned generation, AEP’s interest in Ohio Valley Electric Corp., purchased power agreements and renewables.

3. Excludes pumped storage; includes owned capacity and purchased power.

4. Regulated wind and solar capacity on line or under contract.

2

2

4. Regulated wind and solar capacity on line or under contract.

Electricity Supply ChallengesElectricity Supply Challenges• Generation

– Increasing electricity demandCli t h d d i t d CO i i l f f il f l l– Climate change and drive to reduce CO2 emissions: role of fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables

– Increased investment costs– Re-emergence of market-based supply

• Transmission– Aging and stressed infrastructure in need of renewal to maintain reliability and

reduce congestion– Expansion to provide access to renewable resources– Expansion to provide access to renewable resources– Needed changes in planning, cost allocation, and siting

• DistributionManaging continued increase in demand– Managing continued increase in demand

– Integrating Smart Grid technologies and customer interface– Aging infrastructure

3

3

Transmission TodayTransmission Today• Why Change Now?

– Dramatic shifts in generation profile– Increase in electrically isolated large scale y g

renewables– Environmental requirements forcing

retirement of large fossil units– Search for a “bright line” between reliability

and economic transmission projects is i i l tifi i lincreasingly artificial

• What Needs to Change?– Planning for a new energy supply paradigm– Cost allocation principles to enable a strategicCost allocation principles to enable a strategic

expansion of transmission– Siting processes which are aligned with state,

regional and national energy policy objectives

• “What got us here won’t get us there ”• “What got us here won’t get us there.”

4

4

Renewable Energy DevelopmentRenewable Energy Development47% of Nation’s Generation

Interconnection QueueQ

5

5

Evolution of PlanningEvolution of Planning• We need long-term national plan for electric transmission

that considers regional differences but maintains a lcommon goal

– Existing transmission, resources, and populations vary widely

• Plan objectives must include:– Connecting renewable energy– Replacing aging assets

A strategically planned Extra High Voltage (EHV) grid can provide capacity A strategically planned Extra High Voltage (EHV) grid can provide capacity A strategically planned Extra High Voltage (EHV) grid can provide capacity A strategically planned Extra High Voltage (EHV) grid can provide capacity

– Market efficiency– Reliability

A strategically planned Extra High Voltage (EHV) grid can provide capacity, A strategically planned Extra High Voltage (EHV) grid can provide capacity, operating flexibility, and the ability draw on diverse resources that will operating flexibility, and the ability draw on diverse resources that will

insulate consumers from shortages, catastrophic events, and higher prices.insulate consumers from shortages, catastrophic events, and higher prices.

A strategically planned Extra High Voltage (EHV) grid can provide capacity, A strategically planned Extra High Voltage (EHV) grid can provide capacity, operating flexibility, and the ability draw on diverse resources that will operating flexibility, and the ability draw on diverse resources that will

insulate consumers from shortages, catastrophic events, and higher prices.insulate consumers from shortages, catastrophic events, and higher prices.

6

6

Costs & BenefitsCosts & Benefits• Substantial transmission

investments in transmission h ll i t

PJM Wholesale Cost (2009 $/MWh)PJM Wholesale Cost (2009 $/MWh)

have a small impact on customers

• Transmission expansion pfacilitates lower delivered energy costs due to:– Increased competition and

less constrained markets– Reduced energy losses

• Studies show transmission pays for itselfpays for itself

“Least Cost” is rarely “Best Value”“Least Cost” is rarely “Best Value”“Least Cost” is rarely “Best Value”“Least Cost” is rarely “Best Value”

Source: A Survey of Cost Allocation Issues, Methods, and Practices. PJM, March 10,2010.

7

7

Progress in SPPProgress in SPP SPP taking steps to address multi-state EHV transmission expansion and cost allocation

New cost allocation proposal filed with FERC:• “Highway” projects (transmission >300 kV): costs

are shared on postage-stamp basis• “Byway” projects 100-300kV: 1/3 of costs shared

on postage stamp basis; 2/3 allocated to local zones

• “Byway projects” <100 kV: costs fully allocated to local zonesSource: SPP Priority Projects Phase II Report Revision 1, April 2, 2010

Priority Projects: Group of six Priority Projects: Group of six “no regrets” transmission “no regrets” transmission projects recently approvedprojects recently approved

local zones

Now beginning the Integrated Transmission Planning (ITP) Process

• 20-year time frame• Develops transmission solutions to address

economics, reliability, market efficiency, and renewable integration

8

8

We Have to Start Somewhere...We Have to Start Somewhere...• Major transmission projects can take many years to build – the longer we wait, the

longer it will take to meet our energy goals

• Numerous studies have been completed or are underway across the U S many with• Numerous studies have been completed or are underway across the U.S., many with similar results and common elements

• We need to move to develop some “no regrets” projects

MISO RGOS StudyMISO RGOS StudyMISO RGOS StudyMISO RGOS Study SMART StudySMART StudySMART StudySMART Study

9

9

MISO RGOS StudyMISO RGOS StudyMISO RGOS StudyMISO RGOS Study SMART StudySMART StudySMART StudySMART Study

A Way ForwardA Way Forward• Three major hurdles to transmission development:

– Planning – What do we build and when?– Cost Allocation – I don’t want to pay for that guy’s transmission...– Siting – NIMBY

• Hurdles can be overcome by:– Clear energy policy, particularly as it relates to renewables and

CO22– Broad, collaborative transmission planning that recognizes the

unique challenge of renewable integration– Cost support for strategic EHV transmission expansion– State and federal support for siting transmission lines,

particularly those that are critical to meeting energy goals

10

10