joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | p a g e joint monitoring...

23
1 | Page Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment training for UPDF Troops (UGABAG XXV and UNGU V) Evaluation of Results for Child Protection Predeployment Trainings for UDPF Troops – August 2019 Project Title Integrating Child Protection within African Peace and Security Architecture (2017 – 2019) Duration January 2017 to December 2019 Geographical scope Peace Support Training School – Singo, Uganda Assignment Dates 5 th – 13 th August 2019 Contact Information Anthony Njoroge Senior Programme Manager – Protecting Children in Conflict (PCiC) East and Southern Africa Regional Office [email protected] Tel. +254701484653/+254726012779

Upload: others

Post on 25-Sep-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

1 | P a g e

Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of

results for Child Protection Pre-deployment training for UPDF

Troops (UGABAG XXV and UNGU V)

Evaluation of Results for Child Protection Predeployment Trainings for UDPF Troops

– August 2019

Project Title Integrating Child Protection within African Peace and Security Architecture

(2017 – 2019)

Duration January 2017 to December 2019

Geographical scope Peace Support Training School – Singo, Uganda

Assignment Dates 5th – 13th August 2019

Contact Information Anthony Njoroge

Senior Programme Manager – Protecting Children in Conflict (PCiC)

East and Southern Africa Regional Office

[email protected]

Tel. +254701484653/+254726012779

Page 2: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

2 | P a g e

Acknowledgements

This report has been compiled by Joram Kibigo, the Regional Knowledge Management and

Learning Specialist with support from Edgar Indasi, the Regional Monitoring and Evaluation

Coordinator. The report has benefited from contributions of ICPAPSA Project Staff and Uganda

Peoples Defence Forces (UPDF) representatives who have been involved in the implementation

of the “Integrating Child Protection within the African Peace and Security Architecture

2017 - 2019” Project.

The evaluation of results on child protection predeployment training assessment and

documentation with the UPDF involved various individuals whose efforts are highly

acknowledged. Special thanks go to the Lead Facilitator, Brig (Rtd) Charles Wacha Angulo,

Deputy Chief of CIMIC Col Nelson Ahebwa, UPDF Director of Human Rights Maj Jackie

Nakayenze, UPDF Human Rights Officer Catherine NATUKUNDA, Ministry of Defence

Information Officer Stella Sarah, and Lead Instructors at the PSO School Singo Maj Mugaga, Maj

Obita and Maj Mungatihe who played critical roles in the planning and implementation of the

project. The evaluation process was convened under the leadership of the Senior Programmes

Manager, Protecting Children in Conflict, Anthony Njoroge and coordinated by the Regional

Knowledge Management and Learning Specialist Joram Kibigo with support from the Regional

Programming Unit Monitoring and Evaluation Coordinator, Edgar Indasi and the CIVMIL

thematic advisor, Mans Welander.

Sincere gratitude also go to respondents, key informants, focus group discussants and all people

who provided the much needed information and support to make the evaluation process a

success. Their open and candid responses and views form the substance of this report.

Joram Kibigo,

Regional Knowledge Management and Learning Specialist,

Protecting Children in Conflict (PCiC) Programme,

Regional Programming Unit - ESARO

Feedback contact:

Joram Kibigo

Email: [email protected]

Contacts: +254710233890

East and Southern Africa Regional Office, 2nd Floor ABC Place, Waiyaki way, Westlands

P.O. Box 19423-202,

Nairobi, Kenya

Page 3: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

3 | P a g e

List of acronyms

AMISOM African Mission in Somalia

CP Child Protection

CIMIC

DHR

Civil Military Cooperation

Directorate of Human Rights

EASF East Africa Standby Forces

FGD Focused Group Discussion

PSOTC Peace Support Operations Training Centre

RPU Regional Programming Unit

TOT Training of trainers

KII Key Informant Interview

ICPAPSA Integrating Child Protection in Africa Peace and Security

Architecture

UGABAG Uganda Battle Group

UNGU United Nation Guard Unit

UN DPKO

United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations

Page 4: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

4 | P a g e

Executive Summary

Towards assessing the outcomes of child protection predeployment trainings carried out for

UPDF troops, the ICPAPSA Project in collaboration with the Department of Human Rights

(DHR) carried out an evaluation of results assessments on troops returning from the AMISOM

mission in August 2019. The evaluation assessment provided an opportunity to assess and

document the effects contributed by the child protection predeployment training conducted in

June 2018 for approximately 1624 military troops who were trained and deployed for mission

in AMISOM in July 2018.

The assessment incorporated the use of social impact assessment evaluation design framework

that majorly utilized two methods of data collection approaches, including key informant

interview (KII) and Focus group discussions (FGD). During the assessment, key informants

interviews conducted targeted key focal points who were involved in planning and executing

the trainings as well as key informants who were involved in protection children in AMISOM

mission. They included Director(s) Human Rights (UPDF), Battle Group commanders, training

instructors, CIMIC Officers, legal officers among others while two focus group discussion were

held with selected female and male combatants who had been deployed to the mission.

Assessment findings reveal that there has been increased awareness amongst peacekeepers on

child protection practices. This is anchored on the successful roll out of child protection training

curriculum within the PSOTC School during their preparation for deployment in June 2018.

Interactions with combatants demonstrated attitudinal shifts in protection of children, cited by

several peacekeepers during a focus group discussion expressed the need for children to be

supported to attend school and are protected while in school to minimize opportunities for

them to be associated with armed groups in context of conflict. Adherence to laid down

standard operating procedures by peacekeepers enhanced their interactions with children

during mission, some of the combatants noting that prior engagement with children was marred

with suspicions on hearsays that children are used as suicide bombers. These are elements of

knowledge cited from the child protection training they were taken through before deployment

to the mission.

Despite efforts to prevent and protect children from violations, weak structures and

unresponsive systems in context of conflict continue to pose challenges to adequate protection

of children in situations of conflict. Lack of existing accountability mechanisms to address child

rights violations have resulted to use of informal community based structures mostly

perpetuated by religious and community leaders considered mostly to be male, situation that

may constrain participation of girls in accountability mechanisms. Siting examples of children

who are exposed to manual labour within the operational bases for military peacekeepers, a

key informant interview with UPDF officers highlighted the need to strengthen legal frameworks

that clearly articulates roles and responsibility of children highlighting forms of violations that

constitute child labor and mechanisms to address such violations. The assessment also noted

that weak government structures in conflict context continues to pose significant challenges

owing to the fact that most social services are nonexistent in situations of conflict, resulting to

overburdening the support provided by the peacekeepers to the extent that poses a dilemma

between security to the community versus providing humanitarian support to host community.

The report recommends various interventions towards addressing some of the challenges

highlighted during the evaluation process. These includes: continuous CP predeployment

trainings for peacekeepers especially around psychosocial support, integrating CP trainings

Page 5: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

5 | P a g e

within the Somalia National Army and peace actors including the community leaders as well

deployment of training instructors into mission for continued monitoring and assessment on

the application of the knowledge gained during CP trainings. The assessment established lack of

a monitoring mechanism in mission that identifies and documents key lessons, challenges and

best practices that would be relevant in responding effectively to child rights violations and

experiences. It is the evaluation postulation that addressing this lack of effective monitoring

framework should inform effective training and programming for children affected by armed

conflict. This will in turn improve the delivery of CP predeployment trainings and better

responses for children affected by armed conflict based on their needs. Similarly, this will inform

the review of the CP curriculum and tool kit ultimately contributing to ensuring that children

affected by armed conflict are adequately protected.

Page 6: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

6 | P a g e

1. Introduction

In 2018 the Uganda Peoples Defence Forces (UPDF), through the Directorate of Human Rights

in partnership with Save the Children (SC) implementing the ICPAPSA Project (2017 – 2019)

embarked on a capacity strengthening effort for the UPDF troops being prepared for

deployment to active missions in the region. This followed a Master Training workshop held in

Musanze, Rwanda in 2017 that saw at least four representatives (two males and two females)

from Uganda being trained as Master Trainers of Child Protection.

Subsequently, the UPDF embarked on the process of integrating the AU Child Protection

Training Curriculum and Tool Kit into their military school syllabi in response to the directive

from the East African Standby Forces (EASF) to its member states. This was a long and

consultative process that begun with securing approval from the UPDF army leadership to

embed the training tool kit and curriculum into the military training architecture. Successively,

joint UPDF-SC field visits were conducted to selected military schools to foster buy in on the

adoption and implementation of the standardized CP training curriculum and tool kit in May

2018.

In light of the above processes, there was approval and commitment gained to begin the

institutionalization of the standardized EASF curriculum and tool kit that recommended a

Training of Trainers (ToT) workshop for instructors with training mandates across the 10 UPDF

military institutions in the UPDF. With support from Save the Children through the ICPAPSA

Project, the first ToT training was held on 4th – 15th June 2018 in Jinja that benefited 24 training

instructors (2 females, 22 males) who were equipped with knowledge and skill set aimed at

advancing child protection trainings within the institutions. The intended outcome was that

UPDF troops and specifically peacekeepers are equipped to address child rights violation in

armed conflict and post conflict situations.

Timely follow up and joint monitoring support visits in respective military schools were carried

out to support delivery of CP predeployment trainings for peacekeepers and troops, as well as

document highlights and experiences during the roll out of the standardized curriculum and

tool kit. These efforts resulted in successful embedding of CP modules in the training military

programs, most notably, the Peace Support Operations Training Centre (PSOTC) in Singo

where over 6000 military personnel have been trained so far for deployment to active missions

in the region.

Page 7: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

7 | P a g e

Assessment with trained personnel during monitoring support visits revealed that CP

predeployment trainings have been relevant to contribute to enhanced knowledge, skills and

attitudes for military peacekeepers in UPDF on how to protect children in situations of armed

conflict.

1.1. Objective of assignment

Towards assessing the outcomes of child protection predeployment trainings carried out for

UPDF troops, the ICPAPSA Project in collaboration with the Department of Human Rights

(DHR) sought to carry out evaluation assessments on troops returning from the AMISOM

mission in August 2019. The assessment aimed to provide an opportunity to measure the effects

contributed by the child protection predeployment training conducted in June 2018 for

approximately 1624 military troops that were deployed for mission in AMISOM.

Specific objectives of the assessment are twofold:

a) To document experiences on the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) on the impact

of the CP Trainings amongst the deployed UPDF troops from AMISOM.

b) Highlight and capture audiovisual significant change stories and success stories from

troops’ on issues of child protection in context of missions.

The evaluation assessment process was carried out from the 5th – 14th August 2019 in Peace

Support Operations Training Centre in Singo Uganda.

1.2. The Assessment Team

The assessment team led by the outgoing Director of Human Rights in the UPDF and Save the

Children Monitoring Team participated in the 10 day exercise to document peacekeepers

experiences and highlights around child protection during their deployment to AMISOM.

Page 8: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

8 | P a g e

The team engaged with the different categories of military personnel including battle group

commanders, section commanders, CIMIC and intelligence officers, political commissars (who

play the role of child protection focal point) female engagement team (whose role is focused to

engaging with women and children while in the mission), special investigative bureau, legal officer

among other categories of military personnel. These were soldiers who had returned from one

year mission in Somalia. The assessment utilized two main approach to information gathering;

key informant interview and Focus group discussion.

The assessment team was composed of the following participants.

Name Position Organization

Brigadier Charles Wacha

Angulo

Outgoing Director of Human right DRH - UPDF

Colonel Nelson Ahebwa Deputy Chief of CIMIC CIMIC - UPDF

Major Jackie Nakayenze Gender officer and Incoming Director of

Human Rights DRH - UPDF

Catherine Natukunda Human Rights Officer DRH - UPDF

Maj Herbart Obita Child Protection Instructor PSOTC UPDF

Maj Peter Mugaga Lead Instructor–Child Protection PSOTC UPDF

Maj Bernard Mungatihe Child Protection Instructor - PSOTC

Anthony Njoroge Senior Programmes Manager (PCIC) Save the Children

Joram Kibigo Regional Knowledge Management and

Learning specialist (PCIC)

Save the children

Edgar Indasi MEAL Coordinator (RPU) Save the Children

The assessment findings notes the successful roll out of the child protection curriculum in the

PSOTC school which was made possible the help of TOT trained under Save the Children

ICPAPSA project in June 2018. The participants engaged during the assessment shared on some

of the positive experience they had and how the child protection training conducted before

their deployment helped them while in mission in Somalia. The trained and deployed soldiers

also admitted to the fact that the child protection knowledge acquired was relevant not only in

peacekeeping contexts but also back at home as parents. One of the key notable achievement

with potential to enhance sustainability of the ICPAPSA Project initiatives within UPDF, was the

acceptance and adoption of the CP Curriculum and tool kit by the UPDF leadership to roll out

child protection training in all training institutions including recruit training centers. This was

mainly attributed to the efforts of the training instructors and the support offered to them

through the Directorate of Human Rights (DHR) and the ICPAPSA Project.

1.3. Evaluation Methodology

The assessment incorporated the social impact assessment evaluation design framework

(Devereux, Roelen, Béné, Chopra, & Leavy, August 2013). The framework is a flexible approach

that acknowledges the need for social protection as the ultimate basis of assessment for social

protection programmes by highlighting its fundamental objectives; in this case, to build capacity

for peacekeepers to prevent and respond to child rights violations in situations of armed conflict.

Additionally, this alternative design framework acknowledges the need for rigorous evaluation

methods, not only for credibility, but also building on political support for social programmes

towards improving the wellbeing of key actors and beneficiaries in the programme through

feedback and generated lessons.

Specifically, this alternative research framework seeks to strengthen and expand the evidence

base for social programmes in three distinct ways:

Page 9: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

9 | P a g e

a) By explicitly recognizing that programme designs and processes in themselves affect

programme outcomes, at least in the extent to which these design choices and

implementation features are empowering (or disempowering) to the 1programme

participants.

b) By incorporating the less measurable impacts indicators focusing on social benefits of

learning through implementation of the social programme to generate both intended

and unintended impacts amongst programme participants.

c) By explicitly considering two types of feedback mechanisms; an automatic feedback loop

– ‘recursive causality’- where programme impacts may reinforce or compromise

programme effects and a deliberate learning loop, aiming to incorporate lessons learned

into improved design and implementation of the social programme.

The selection of this evaluation design was informed by the need to adequately consider the 2social dimensions and social dynamics approach of the programme during its implementation

and the need to expand and deepen the evidence base identified in support of improved design

and implementation of future ICPAPSA project activities. Greater emphasis was placed on

identifying qualitative evidence and experiences generated through in-depth interviews and

focus group discussion as the main assessment methods employed to participants involved in

the evaluation assessment.

During the evaluation process, key informants interviews conducted involved sessions with

Director(s) Human Rights (UPDF), Battle Group commanders, training instructors, CIMIC

Officers, legal officers among other officers while two focus group discussion were held with

selected female and male combatants who had been deployed to the mission. The interview

schedule and the focus group discussion guide used are attached as Annex 1.

Given the current evidence gap and information available on assessment of impact on child

protection predeployment trainings for peacekeepers, it is the opinion of the evaluation team

that the findings generated from this assessment provide the basis for subsequent evaluation of

predeployment trainings for peacekeeper during training and in mission contexts.

1 Includes all actors involved in the programme across genders and generations, beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries and

including participation in social institutions structures and systems. 2 Social dimension and dynamic approach treats human wellbeing as a dynamic state generated through ongoing conscious and

sub-conscious participation in social, economic, political, cultural and natural processes. So either people will or will not be able to acquire sufficient food to maintain their health (a physical outcome); they will or will not be able to sustain sufficient relationships with others to function effectively in society (a relational outcome); and they will or will not be able to feel satisfied about what they are able to do or to be in society (a subjective outcome)” (McGregor [forthcoming], 2014: 4). 7

Page 10: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

10 | P a g e

2. Evaluation of Results Findings.

This section of the report presents the key findings against the following evaluation criteria:

project’s relevance and strategic fit in the delivery of child protection predeployment trainings,

coherence of project design, effectiveness and efficiency of project delivery towards desired

outputs and impact, and lesson orientation towards scale-up and sustainability of the project

activities.

Relevance and strategic fit of the design and the training processes in enhancing

capacity for peacekeepers.

Successful roll out of Child protection training curriculum through a ToT model

The focus on strengthening child protection trainings through engagement of training

instructors was a considered approach by the UPDF to increase capacity for trainers within

UPDF training institutions towards a long term sustainable approach. The assessment made out

the intention to sustain child protection training by ensuring that instructors with a training

mandate were identified, equipped and tasked to roll out components of the child protection

training curriculum in line with the needs and requirements of peacekeepers at every level of

their training. The assessment established through an interview with outgoing Director of

Human Rights that a clear directive had been issued through the military leadership to embed

CP in all the training institutions within the UPDF.

While this approach seemed effective for Trainers of Trainees (ToT) in the Peace Support

Operations Training School (PSOTC) in Singo, very little had been achieved in other training

institution and especially at the UPDF recruit training school. At the point of the assessment,

most of the training conducted had only taken place at the PSOTC. The assessment notes that

despite a go ahead directive to roll out the curriculum in training institutions, other training

institutions are still struggling with the process of embedding the CP modules due to structural

challenges incumbent in the training institutions. While most of the trainers are still junior

officers, key decisions around prioritisation of such CP modules was initially identified as a

challenge in light of other competing trainings. With the directive issue through the military

leadership, the assessment notes that there is likelihood for a structured institutionalisation

process of CP trainings moving forward. However, the assessment also noted the need for

technical support from the project to help structure and streamline delivery of the CP trainings

as the process is being initiated in other training institutions.

Despite the prevailing structural challenges, the

evaluation established that the UPDF had demonstrated

strong commitment and will at the highest level of the

UPDF leadership to institutionalize child protection

trainings within the military training infrastructure.

Interaction with the outgoing Director of Human Rights

within the UPDF notes that the support to

institutionalize and roll out child protection

predeployment training within the UPDF has gained

traction over time to becoming one of the mandatory

courses to be facilitated within every military training

schools as part of proactive efforts to enhance

protection of children rights in the region.

Page 11: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

11 | P a g e

It is this commitment and will that had sufficiently translated to increased resource allocation

in terms of time and human resources to ensure that troops being prepared for deployment to

missions have been adequately trained on child rights and protection and especially at the

PSOTC. Budgetary allocation towards CP trainings remains low, but the assessment identified

that ongoing conversations had begun to even prioritize child protection training within the

military training and capacity building budget. The project’s advocacy focus on resourcing for

institutionalization of CP trainings is therefore regarded as appropriate and taking shape given

the progress and inherent structural challenges around financing child protection trainings in

the UPDF history. To date, more than 6000 military personnel have been trained on child

protection predeployment training. Over 4000 have been deployed to active missions in the

region.

Thus, the assessment notes that the design of the project capacity building activities and process

was found to be aligned with the UPDF’s training priorities as articulated by instructors involved

in conducting the child protection trainings. The assessment found that there has been

consistency in ensuring CP training for the last four deployment preparation trainings that have

been conducted within the PSOTC. This is considered a success attributed to the support of

the project with coordination from the Directorate of Human Rights. A key design feature of

the project was its ability to scale up the roll out of child protection training by building capacity

of training instructors (ToTs) mandated to offer trainings within the UPDF training institution.

This increased the demand for CP trainings thereby enhancing efficiency in the delivery of CP

training within the UPDF training schools. So far the roll out of the curriculum in the Peace

Support Operations Training Centre (PSOTC) was identified as a success.

Monitoring of training effectiveness still remains a design and process challenge. The assessment

found that while there is clear prioritization of child protection trainings in training plans within

the PSOTC, monitoring and field support to assess application of these trainings in nonexistent.

This is attributed to limited financial resources available to ensure proper monitoring and

assessment of trainings conducted in missions. The assessment findings recommends continued

support to monitor effectiveness of the CP training amongst troops in mission in two ways:

through supporting structured in mission follow up visits by the training instructors and the

project technical support team as well as building capacity of officers being deployed on effective

monitoring and evaluation of trainings and highlighting their roles at the mandate setting stage

within the UPDF code of conduct on child protection. The assessment notes that monitoring

conducted in mission is mainly on accountability for child rights violation and little on

effectiveness of child protection capacity building initiatives.

Although the ToT model of the project and its outcomes for scale-up and sustainability strategy

is hinged on government and other partners replicating the project interventions so as to sustain

outcomes and impact, the project will consider supporting technically on training and delivery

of child protection sessions although to a limited extent to allow the UPDF to take lead on

these initiatives.

“…the training we received at ToT provided the opportunity for us to

practically deliver information and experiences that peacekeepers experience

when deployed to missions. Every so often, we keep backing our messaging

with the experience and learning we have drawn from our mission experience”

TRAINING INSTRUCTOR, PSOTC, SINGO

Page 12: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

12 | P a g e

The evaluation also looked at the prospects of scale-up and sustainability through interviews

with key informants especially those who had been involved in the training and roll out of the

training curriculum for peacekeepers, as well as peacekeepers who had been deployed for

AMISOM mission after the predeployment training. The findings were that some aspects of the

project activities had prospects of being replicated and sustained, for instance, CP

predeployment training for peacekeepers as they prepare for predeployment as well as support

from the Directorate of Human Rights and Chieftaincy of CIMIC on technical delivery of CP

trainings.

Additional ToT trainings for more instructors was a notable disadvantaged prospects

highlighted through the evaluation process that may hardly go beyond the end of the project

support, considering the limited budgetary allocation for CP trainings within the UPDF.

However, the UPDF is likely to replicate and sustain the aspects of the trainings that require

no or minimal resources and those that easily integrates within usual routine. Examples here

being monitoring support supervision and on-site coaching and mentorship to training

instructors by the DRH and CIMIC department. Interventions such as ToT curriculum-based

training and in mission support to assess the effect of trainings offered to peacekeepers will

depend on budgetary allocation within the UPDF and external support from partners.

Page 13: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

13 | P a g e

Assessing the learning benefits and social impacts identified through

implementation of capacity building programme activities within the UPDF

Improved knowledge and attitude on child protection and its effect to adherence

of laid down procedures by UPDF soldiers and other mission success.

The evaluation examined the extent to which the project activities translated to outputs and

achieved the intended results in the context of mission. The desired state was that

peacekeepers had adequate capacity in terms of knowledge, attitudes and skills to identify and

respond to child rights violation in situations of conflict.

Focus group discussions (FGD) with the soldiers who had just returned from the mission in

Somalia (AMISOM), pointed to the fact that their mission in Somalia has been widely successful.

Although not all the soldier who were deployed had received the child protection

(approximately 724 combatants and 240 officers received the training), the assessment noted

positive contribution amongst those who had undergone the training. Instances recorded noted

that trained combatants were especially way better in articulating the do’s and don’ts in mission

in matters concerning child protection. The trained soldiers attributed to the fact that, not

only was the training important for their mission in Somalia, but this training continues to be

important to them as parents back home.

An analysis with female

combatants identified an

innovative approach by the UPDF

in addressing some of the social

cultural challenges in engaging

with the host community in

Somalia. FGDs held with several

combatants noted the special

responses by the Female

Engagement Teams (FETs), female

combatants whose mandate was

focused on interacting with mostly

women and children in the

community as part of identifying and responding to their needs. This unique approach is

becoming a critical bridge that provides support mostly to children and women, enhancing the

objectivity of the CP predeployment training to respond to children rights as well as enhancing

learnings on areas of improvement in response to some of the violations facing children in the

region.

The session on unpacking children needs and legal frameworks that exist around protecting

children in situation of armed conflict came alive in the eyes on one female combatant whose

experience involved a child who had been sent to gather intelligence from the troops.

“…The training well prepared me as FET officer for the mission as now we

could be able to handle for instance some of the children who come to spy on

us” - (FET FGD Participant)

Page 14: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

14 | P a g e

In her words, she could probably not have handled such a case in the same way she did had she

not been trained on how to handle children. She remarks that her initial engagement with

children was suspicious and founded on information she had heard before, where children were

being used as suicide bombers and triggers targeting the peacekeepers. Learning how to

communicate with children has allowed her and the team to avert potential threats to peace

keepers as well as strengthen approaches to understanding and addressing challenges that

children undergo as they engage with armed non-state actors who may tend to take advantage

of them

Initial assessments during predeployment training with Musoki Rounny, a FET officer

interviewed during the training appeared to be a constant reflection for many of the combatant

who participated in this assessment. The evaluation indicate positive change in attitude for

peacekeepers who felt they would rather prioritize prevention strategies like ensuring children

are enrolled in school rather than responsive mechanism that seek to capture children involved

in war and rehabilitate them in the process of reintegrating them back to their community. The

assessment recognized the awareness

sensitivity amongst peacekeepers

attributed the trainings by highlighting

specific case scenarios that required

careful analysis by peacekeepers to

address specific cases around child

protection. Increasingly, there is now

demand for constant update of

security context during trainings to

bring training participants to date on

context and experiences in mission, a

reflection that the program plans to

take into consideration moving

forward.

Page 15: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

15 | P a g e

Some of the knowledge and attitude change highlights attributed to the project activities

conducted amongst the troops before deployment for mission to AMISOM were identified

through the assessment. Engagements with key informants postulated that the project activities

had addressed knowledge gaps around challenges faced during handling children in situation of

conflict. For instance, some of these challenges as initially noted during training evaluations

included lack of awareness on children rights, poor communication with children in situations

of conflict, poor life skills in handling children during situations of conflict as well as inability to

address gender specific needs for boys and girls affected by conflict. Through the roll out and

institutionalization process of the Child Protection predeployment trainings, there was

observable knowledge and attitude change by peacekeepers who had especially gained

competence to identify gender specific needs for boys and girls in PSO and proactively

responding to them as identified.

The story of one male combatant serving at the United Nations Guard Unit (UNGU V)

articulates these sentiments further. Victor Omara (name altered for privacy concerns) is

excited to know that his role on child protection transcends the mission context to his

household role as a father where he now has an opportunity to practice what he learned

through the child protection training.

Read the case study below: (Annex 3 To be attached)

Page 16: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

16 | P a g e

Reinforcing programme effects through effective feedback mechanisms and deliberate

learning loops (recursive causality) in the implementation of the project activities.

Towards building an open and efficient accountability environment with peacekeepers in

addressing and responding to child rights violations in PSOs, the project has been keen to

support initiatives that establish efficient feedback mechanisms amongst actors in situations of

conflict. Through the evaluation assessment, the project is collating feedback and lessons

through the experiences of peacekeepers in efforts to strengthen delivery of child protection

interventions that are responsive to the needs of children affected by armed conflict.

Effective accountability for children requires integration of Child protection

awareness across all PSO actors and including host communities in mission

Interview with the troop commanders brought to the fore pertinent concerns over child right

violations present within the operation environment. While boys and girls security concerns

are apparent and known to peacekeepers during mission support, other forms of child rights

violations are persistent and evident in the mission, and beyond the control of peacekeepers.

Child labour for instance was identified as the most common form of violation witnessed where

children who have been contracted by local companies working around the operation

environment continue to be witnessed.

“…most of the children who come to our forward operation bases are in critical

need of either food or medical attention. They look malnourished and helpless.

Others have to work in casual jobs to get resources to buy food. This is

especially a major challenge” ~ BATTLE GROUP COMMANDER, UGABAG XXV

Page 17: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

17 | P a g e

The above sentiments were

corroborated by peacekeepers

through a FGD noting the

rampant use of children as casual

labourers working with

companies that have been

contracted to provide social

services around the operations

area. Through the interactions

with peacekeepers from the

mission, the assessment

identified lack of awareness by

the host community on children

rights, and including limited capacity by the host government to prevent and respond to children

violations, a situation that continuously pose challenges and concerns over security of boys and

girls in such situations.

These issues were identified as common violations that continues to pose challenges around

interactions with other peacekeepers during mission. Other child rights concerns sexual

exploitation of young girls within the host communities, child marriage, malnutrition and

recruitment of boys to protect and provide for their families within the community are

anchored on social cultural beliefs held by the host community that continues to challenge the

effectiveness of protecting children in such situations.

A case example mentioned was a situation that involved a young boy (12years) whose father

was a member of the Somali National Army (SNA), who upon his death, was recruited to

replace his father by serving in the same army rank as his father. The basis for joining the army

was anchored on the need to provide and protect the family, a situation that is widely approved

by the host community. One of the officers who identified this issues raised concerns over the

same through his seniors and upon consultations with the host military, there was a promise

to look into the matter. A close follow up on the identified issue by the said officer highlighted

livelihoods concerns and social cultural belied that anchored the decisions to maintain the child

in service. At the point of the assessment, the issue had been escalated for redress. These

testaments highlight enhanced skills and commitment to address child rights violations and

despite slow bureaucratic response in addressing these violations, the assessment opines that

positive attitudes on child protection have been enhanced amongst peacekeepers.

While efforts to sensitize the community through outreach programmes conducted by UPDF

peacekeepers in mission were mentioned, their effectiveness were considered questionable on

the basis of frequency of these outreach programmes and lack of resource to support such

initiatives efficiently. As a recommendation, the evaluation assessment gathered the need to

create awareness to the host community around child rights and child protection, with the

hope that this will complement the efforts by peacekeepers to adequately safeguard children

from all other forms of child rights violations not considered part of their mission mandate.

This can be made possible in several ways; through the innovative approaches of the FET who

are constantly engaging with women and children at service points on a regular basis, involving

and engaging the local CSOs working in the community and including working with community

gatekeepers around sensitization of child rights and protection through the child protection

actors on the ground in mission.

Interactions with combatants also reiterated the need to involve the community in protection

of children rights as most consultations affecting children are tackled together through the

Page 18: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

18 | P a g e

existing community structures involving mostly clan leaders and religious leaders. These

considerations feed into the evaluation recommendations. In enhancing accountability on

protection of children rights, there is need to enhance collaborations with civil society

organisations working with the host community especially around creating awareness on the

need to promote and protect child rights. These measure include working with the existing

community structures that are influential to contribute to the desired state of prevention of

such violations as child labour and sexual exploitation of boys and girls.

It means also reinforcing on reporting and responsive systems at the community level, capable

of addressing violations that are identified concerning children. Recommendations from the

United Nations Guard Unit (UNGU) highlighted the need to specifically develop polices centred

on an alternative set of addressing such child rights violations that included establishing set

standards operating procedures that will discourage involvement of children as casual workers

contracted by companies tendered to work within and around the operation environment. The

pragmatic approach of working with civil societies to involve community leaders and youth

leaders in addressing these kind of violations should be emphasised and especially in enhancing

awareness on the rights of children.

Reinforcing on the sentiments to sustain child protection predeployment trainings within the

UPDF, an interview with the outgoing Director of Human Rights revealed that child protection

will automatically be part of the training of soldier as the leadership of UPDF had agreed to

include child protection as part of the training, including at the recruitment training institutions.

Through his remarks, the assessment highlight the commitment by the UPDF towards enhancing

protection of children rights in the region.

Through the learnings generated, we hope that the ICPAPSA project will integrate lesson

highlighted through the evaluation to improve support and implementation of child rights

interventions that address the needs of children affected by armed conflict. The assessment also

found out that advocacy initiatives at the national level can be sustained through the existing

multi-stakeholder learning events held annually within the UPDF.

There was consensus among key informants that the community engagement component

around accountability for children in conflict operation areas will be the most unlikely to be

replicated and sustained. Whether the UPDF-supported community outreach programs will

continue on creating awareness around child rights and providing support and access to

humanitarian services at the community-level will depend on personal motivation and level of

support from their local leaders and community members and the mission g funders (UN and

AU). On their part, the UPDF through the DRH and CIMIC arms should make it a policy that

any future trainings in the UPDF entails coordination activities that engages the current training

instructors and support from DRH/CIMIC rather than doing trainings afresh. This should also

include setting up a system where the current and active Trainers themselves continue training

new trainers so as to build continuity and sustainability. To bolster this prospects of

sustainability, respondents were of the opinion that Save the Children through the ICPAPSA

Project should ensure a well-coordinated exit that include a final curriculum based review and

training of ToTs in light of the findings of the impact assessment conducted.

Page 19: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

19 | P a g e

3. Conclusions and Summary Recommendations

The goal of the ICPAPSA project with regards to troops contributing countries (UPDF) was to

contribute to enhanced capacity for peacekeepers to prevent and respond to child rights

violation in situations of conflict. Approximately three years after the intervention was initiated,

the expected outcomes identified were (1) increased awareness on child rights and child rights

violation in situation of conflicts (2) enhance capacity for more than 6000 troops on child

protection in conflict situations as well as (3) enhanced commitments by the UPDF to prioritize

the roll out and institutionalisation of the child protection trainings.

The applied evaluation design and approach was informed mainly by the need to generate

learnings through ‘recursive causality’. Due to limited baseline data and lack of appropriate

counterfactuals at the start of the trainings, it was impossible for this evaluation to determine

whether the expected outcomes and related impact was only attributable to the project

intervention. However, efforts to estimate the highlighted outcomes and impact through

explored information from peacekeepers during the assessment seem to suggest positive effects

in terms of enhanced capacity and knowledge on prevention and response to child rights

violations. While information on the situation of conflict on boys and girls in Somalia could be

an underestimation of the impact of the trainings conducted to UPDF peacekeepers, the

information gathered on experiences from peacekeepers provide useful insights, including

possible trends on capacity enhancement of peacekeepers, with potential to inform

development of robust capacity building and prevention programmes.

Conclusions

Drawing from the findings presented in this report, the evaluation made a number of

conclusions as outlined below:

1. Firstly, the ICPAPSA project was certainly relevant to the needs of children in situation

of armed conflict by extension and appropriate for enhancing capacity of peacekeepers

to ensure these needs (prevention and protection from harm) are meet and upheld. The

project also focused on key capacity gaps for peacekeeper within the UPDF that

constrained understanding, capacity and even skills to address and protect children in

needs

The project design and processes (the ToT model) adopted were aligned with UPDF

priorities and training infrastructure, particularly use of lead instructors in PSO training

centre and other training institutions to accelerate achievement of capacity development

for peacekeepers. This is/was in line with Sida ambition and strategy both globally and

regionally as well as the objectives of Save the Children breakthrough; to survive, learn

and be protected.

2. Secondly, building up to the successes identified, the project had implemented most of

the capacity building activities and almost all the planned outputs had been achieved.

The observed under-performance was mainly on follow up in mission to assess the

effectiveness of the training and it was clear from the evaluation that this had a lot to

do with fluid security situation in mission that posed threats to the projects team as well

as lack of resources within the UPDF to finance to the follow up activities.

Additionally, lack of a clear monitoring framework and capacity of peacekeepers to

conduct monitoring and follow up assessments contributes to lack of up to date

information on effectiveness of such capacity building interventions for peacekeepers.

Page 20: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

20 | P a g e

3. Thirdly, there is mixed prospects that the project interventions and related outcomes

will be replicated and sustained. Aspects that do not require financial inputs stand a

better chance of being taken up by the UPDF. However, more needs to be done to

increase financial commitments by the UPDF leadership towards capacity building and

follow up supports to assess effectiveness of child protection trainings and interventions.

4. Lastly, for lack of solid baseline counterfactual to compare with during this assignment,

made it difficult to pass a concrete judgement on the extent to which the project has

achieved its intended outcomes and impact. It is clear, however, there’s been significant

positive effects in terms of enhanced capacity and knowledge on prevention and

response to child rights violations.

Recommendations

A number of recommendations can be derived from the findings and conclusions of this

evaluation. They are organized into two categories, (1) recommendations to UPDF regarding

the scale up and sustainability of the projects outcomes in future (2) recommendation to the

project (and donor) regarding improving comprehensive protection and accountability for

children in situations of armed conflict.

a) Recommendations to UPDF

I. The UPDF should sustain the interventions implemented by the ICPAPSA project by

ensuring sustained commitment and follow up on training sessions on child protection

predeployment trainings. There is need for further integration of the child protection

curriculum within the UPDF training infrastructure (schools) to further enhance

knowledge and capacity of peacekeepers. The training before deployment should be

more of sensitization on key mission experiences as well context challenges that CP

trainings should address. DRC and CIMIC arms within the UPDF should consider

motivating other schools to completely roll out the curriculum in the respective

schools

II. Monitoring support visits conducted as well as technical support through the DRH and

CIMIC arms of the UPDF should continue as they provide useful basis on which to

continue addressing the outstanding capacity and knowledge gaps around protection

of children rights during training and in mission.

III. The current level of budgetary allocation for CP trainings within the UPDF falls short

of resources envisaged to adequately institutionalise the CP course. More investments

are required from both government and partners to reinforce the institutionalisation

process. There is also need to leverage on the already attained traction of CP trainings

in PSOTC to enhance the impact around child protection. This report also

recommended more involvement of the DRH and CIMIC arms of the UPDF in

planning, executing and monitoring progress on delivery of CP trainings within the

UPDF. Some instructors may get transferred or committed to other duties hence an

institution may lack instructors to undertake the CP trainings.

More regular and structured CP training and supervision support by the already

trained TOTs is recommended. The UPDF should make it a policy that any future

programmes by any stakeholder that entails CP training activities should engage the

same ToTs rather than doing recruitment afresh. Technical support during CP training

Page 21: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

21 | P a g e

delivery by DRH and CIMIC should prioritize existing TOTs as a way of motivating

them and supporting them during delivery.

IV. Instructors should also be deployed into mission for continues assessment of how the

soldiers are implementing the training they learned in the field, this will enable them to

know how to deliver the training better. Regular assessment of the soldiers should

also be encouraged (during predeployment, in mission and post deployment.

V. The DRH and CIMIC arm should leverage on learning opportunities within the UPDF

calendar to share experiences that would enrich the delivery and application of child

protection knowledge and competence. Through learning events and knowledge

exchange fora held annually by the UPDF, the two departments should also act as

feedback mechanism to the UPDF leadership providing an opportunity to advocate

around policies and resourcing for CP trainings.

b) Recommendations to the ICPAPSA Project.

1. The UPDF model initiated through the support of the ICPAPSA project, has created

traction for demand to strengthening and improve capacity of peacekeepers to prevent

and protect children rights in situations. This model appears to bear good potential of

catalysing change around protection of children rights in peace support operations.

Design of similar future project should adopt and further refine this model amongst

other major troops contributing countries.

2. Technical assistance provided to UPDF by Save the Children through the ICPAPSA

project on delivery of CP trainings should be consistent and as well try to contextualise

the mission experiences and highlights for troops being trained for deployment. There

is need for more regular field visits and cross-learning with other country training

models including benchmarking trips is also recommended to offer exposure to the

instructors on effective delivery of CP trainings.

In addition support to UPDF on training should consider production of simplified pocket

cards in local language or Swahili for soldiers to continue familiarizing themselves with

CP standards and practice even while on mission.

3. To adequately address accountability for child rights violations, the project should

consider working with the host communities, this includes training the Somali National

Army on awareness and protection of children rights. The evaluation suggest working

with local CSO to build community awareness on child rights as well as strengthening

the country’s child protection and accountability mechanisms.

Page 22: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

22 | P a g e

Annexes

1. Evaluation of Results with UPDF – Terms of Reference

2. Evaluation of Results Tools

3. Case study (to be attached)

Page 23: Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on ...€¦ · 1 | P a g e Joint monitoring assessment and documentation on evaluation of results for Child Protection Pre-deployment

23 | P a g e

Evaluation Photo Gallery