joint program executive office for chemical and biological defense uniform integrated protection...

Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense

Uniform Integrated ProtectionEnsemble Increment 2

(UIPE Incr 2)

Lauretta WelchUIPE Incr 2 Product ManagerJoint Project Manager for Protection703-617-2417

March 17, 2015

UNCLASSIFIED

Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. v6

Industry Day Agenda

0830 – 0900 Check-In / Registration

0900 – 0910 Welcome & Introductions

0910 – 0915 Administrative Notes

0915 – 0930 JPEO & JPM Protection Overview

0930 – 0945 Introduction to UIPE Incr 2

0945 – 1015 UIPE Incr 2 Technical Approach

1015 – 1030 UIPE Incr 2 Logistics Introduction

1030 – 1100 UIPE Incr 2 Contracting Overview

1100 – 1130 Break

1130 – 1200 Answer Session to Industry Questions

1230 – 1300 Lunch Break

1300 – 1630 One-on-Ones

2Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

• This Request for Information is for information and planning purposes only.

• This is not an Invitation for Bid or a Request for Proposal and is not to be taken as a commitment by the Government to issue an order or otherwise pay for the information solicited.

• The Government shall not be liable for, or suffer any consequential damages for any technical information (e.g., limited and/or restricted rights) submitted in response to this Request for Information.

• Questions & Answers. The Government reserves the right to defer answers until questions are properly staffed.

Disclaimer


Industry Day

Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense (JPEO-CBD)/Joint Project Management Office

for Protection (JPM P) OverviewMs. Lauretta Welch

UIPE Incr 2 Product Manager


Defense Acquisition Executive

Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical & Biological Defense Organizational Chart

Army Acquisition Executive

JPEOMr. Carmen Spencer

DJPEOMr. Doug Bryce

Medical Countermeasure Systems

COL Russell Coleman

NBC Contamination Avoidance

COL Alfred Abramson

GuardianCOL James Choung

Information SystemsMr. Scott White

Radiological & Nuclear Defense

Mr. Alan Burket

Elimination (P)Mr. Jeffrey Harris

Joint Project Managers Joint Project Managers

Chief of StaffMr. Gregg Heilig

DoD

Army

Navy

Air Force

Marines

OPCON

(P) = Provisional

ProtectionMr. Scott Paris

DCoS Strategic Portfolio Integration

Mr. Dan McCormick

DCoS Support Operations

Ms. Lauren Ishmael


Joint Project Manager for ProtectionVisionTo deliver the most effective and affordable materiel solutions in a timely manner today, while preparing for the challenges of tomorrow. To be the Warfighter and First Responder‘s primary (re)source for percutaneous, respiratory, expeditionary, transportable, shipboard and fixed site individual and collective protection as well as hazard mitigation capabilities.

MissionTo equip and sustain the Joint Force for current and future expeditionary, deliberate, and crisis-response operations with the most capable and cost effective full spectrum chemical, biological, and radiological protection and hazard mitigation capabilities.

Special Efforts

Provides expertise:• Major Defense Acquisition

Program (MDAP) Trail Boss • SOCOM Program

Management• USNORTHCOM Homeland

Defense Initiatives

Hazard Mitigation

Provide Warfighters with technologies that rapidly reduce contamination hazards and enable reduction of MOPP level while reducing life-cycle costs and logistical burdens. Includes aircraft, advanced threat, point of use, TIC/TIM, wound, and human remains decon.

Individual Protection

Provide Warfighters with:• Percutaneous protection

(suits, boots, gloves)• Inhalation and ocular

protection (respirators) on the ground and in the air, to include rotary and fixed wing variants

Collective Protection

Provide Warfighters with Mobile, Transportable, Shipboard, and Fixed Site collective protection systems. Includes but not limited to filters, shelters, field hospitals, and kits.


UIPE Inc 2Product Manager

Lauretta Welch

JPM P Organization Chart

7

Deputy Joint Project Manager

Ruzena Rok

JECPProduct Manager

Mike Boruch

UIPE Inc 1Product Manager

Katrina Jewell

CBPSProduct Manager

Gregg Buehler

JSEW/GPDProduct Manager

Erica Howell

CPFHProduct Manager

Brian Rainer

JSAM ApacheProduct Manager

Don Kilduff

JSAM JSFProduct Manager

Ryan Adams

JSGPMProduct Manager

Bill Fritch

SustainmentProduct DirectorDanielle Fleming

JSAM FWProduct Manager

Don Cline

CIDASProduct Manager

Kelly Conerly

USMCUSAUSNUSAF

StaffordDahlgren

NatickECBC

Philadelphia

Product Managers

Assistant Joint Project Manager

External OperationsVic Murphy

CPS BKFTProduct Manager

Chip Warder

CHRPProduct Manager

Dustin Green

JSAM StrategicAircraft

Product ManagerJorge Hernandez

JSAM RWProduct ManagerDebbie Singleton

Chief of StaffGerald Jones

JSAM TacticalProduct Manager

LeRoy Garey

Joint Project ManagerScott Paris

Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Industry Day

Uniform Integrated Protection Ensemble Increment 2Overview


UIPE Incr 2 POCs

Team Member TitleLaurie Welch Product ManagerMajor Shayla Parker Assistant Product ManagerLisa Mardin Contract SpecialistHeather Shirey Lead Systems EngineerTara Bell Lead Test & EvaluationMelissa Smith Lead LogisticianBob Fithian Test & Evaluation SupportShannon Blackmon Programmatic SupportMarie Jean-Pierre Design & Engineering


• Draft Capability Development Document (CDD) under development for improved percutaneous protection against chemical and biological threats

• Concurrent development of components to ensure compatibility, interoperability

• Anticipated Key Performance Parameters (KPP) – Protection– Thermal Burden

Requirements


Industry Day

Uniform Integrated Protection Ensemble Increment 2

Technical Approach

Systems Engineering LeadMs Heather Shirey

[email protected]

Test & Evaluation LeadMs Tara Bell

[email protected]


• Percutaneous Protection: Everything except respiratory and ocular

• Provide any and all ideas– Novel closure ideas?– Coatings?– Is an entire suit needed?– Is a suit the solution at all?

Technical Considerations

No Preconceived Notions12Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

• Government will be lead systems integrator• Will consider combining multiple technologies• Will use organic design resources to fullest extent

possible

Technical Considerations


• Review Request For Information Responses• Request vendor samples of technologies of interest• Conduct Risk Reduction Testing• Review Risk Reduction Test Data and Analyze Trade

Space– Use analysis to assist in requirements development

Post-Milestone A• Establish Manufacturing Partner• Explore Design Concepts

Path Forward


• Range of Performance Attributes– Chemical/Biological Protection– Durability– Thermal Burden

• Other Attributes– Technology and Manufacturing Maturity– Logistics Considerations

• Request Samples from Promising Responses for Risk Reduction Analysis – Provide Individual Test Data to submitter

Review of RFI Responses


Risk Reduction Analysis

• Purpose– To understand the performance, trades, and possibilities

afforded by state of the art technologies– Inform Requirements

• Test plans will be adjusted to accommodate technologies received

• Potential tests

16

Tests conducted will be adjusted to accommodate unique technologies

UIP

E In

cr 2

Abrasion Chemical PermeationFlame Resistance Guarded Hot PlateAnti-Microbial Properties AerosolMoisture Vapor Transport Rate

Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Industry Day


Logistics Overview

Ms Melissa [email protected]


• Looking for innovative logistics practices from “cradle to grave” – Specific logistics requirements will be included in requirements

documents– Exploring strategies that help the industrial base, both organic and

commercial– Possibly leverage commercial best practices for the sustainment

strategy– Responsibility to the Warfighter to provide a capability that is

safe, suitable, supportable, and affordable

Thought Process on Logistics

Industry / JPM P / Services / Stakeholders

Cradle to Grave Logistics Planning

Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 18

• Limit unique packaging, handling, storage and transportation requirements (to include Care of Supply in Storage)

• Field repairable is preferred• Ease of use for training and operational use – no complicated

solutions• Interoperable with majority of Military equipment• Limit unique disposal requirements

Logistics Considerations

The Warfighter is the System “Protect the Warfighter so they can do ANYTHING”

Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 19

Industry Day


Contracting Overview

Mr. John [email protected]


Contracting Overview

Three Potential Paths Forward• 1. Title 10 Challenge

• 2. Procurement Contract

• 3. Other Transaction

Title 10 Challenge

Title 10 Challenge

• Section 2374a of Title 10 of the United States Code authorizes the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director, Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E), and the Service acquisition executive of each military department, to conduct programs to award up to $10 million in cash prizes to recognize outstanding achievements in basic, advanced, and applied research; technology development; and prototype developments that are potentially applicable to the military missions of the Department of Defense (DoD)

Title 10 Challenge

Characteristics:

• Attracts a broader spectrum of participants

• Unlike traditional contract vehicles covered by federal acquisition

regulations, the intellectual property (IP) associated with the competition’s entries remain the property of the competitors.

• Cash prizes – 1st, 2nd, 3rd

Title 10 Challenge

Standard Competition Participant Eligibility

Team Leader Team Member

Citizenship Must be a U.S. Citizen U.S. Citizenship not required

Age 21 years minimum 18 years minimum

Employment Status Cannot be current employee of the Federal Government (Civilian or Military). Included are employees of FFRDCs.

Other U.S.- or Foreign-owned Companies permitted to enter provided team leader meets age and citizenship requirements.

Title 10 Challenge

Process• 1. Press Release announcing details of the competition

• 2. Website posted with competition details, objectives, and rules

• 3. Public Information Forum ((briefings by Program Managers on plans, objectives, rules and procedures)

• 4. Registration Period

• 5. Competition Submissions

• 6. Evaluation

• 7. Prizes

Title 10 Challenge

Past ChallengesDARPA Urban ChallengeThe DARPA Urban Challenge was held on November 3, 2007. A total prize purse of

$3.5 million was offered for the three fastest and safest vehicles that traversed a 60-mile urban course in moving traffic in less than 6 hours.

1st place: $2,000,000.002nd place: $1,000,000.003rd place: $500,000.00

Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit (TALOS)The USSOCOM TALOS program held a challenge in November 2014 for concepts and ideas to significantly reduce the latency associated with digital night vision optic systems. The total guaranteed payout was $12,500, with at least one award being no smaller than $5,000 and no award being smaller than $1,000. In addition, an extra $12,500 in award money was available for truly exceptional submissions. By submitting a proposal, a “Solver” granted to the Government a royalty-free, perpetual, and non-exclusive license to use any information included in the Solver’s proposal.

Procurement Contract

Procurement Contract• A contract between the government and a private party to

provide supplies or services. • Governed by the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR)

Cooperative Agreements

Other Transaction

• “Other transactions,“ commonly referred to as OT, OTAs, or 874 Agreements, is a term commonly used to refer to the 10 U.S.C. 2371 authority to enter into transactions other than contracts, grants or cooperative agreements.

• OTAs provide tremendous flexibility, since instruments for prototype projects, awarded pursuant to this authority, generally are not subject to federal laws and regulations limited in applicability to procurement contracts.

Compare and Contrast

Significant differences among the three contract vehicles:

• 1. Eligibility• 2. Governing Regulations• 3. Value• 4. Intellectual Property Rights• 5. Process


Eligibility

Challenge Team Leader: 21+, U.S. Citizen, Team Member: 18+, no citizenship requirementNo participant may be a current employee of the Federal Government (Civilian or Military). Included are employees of FFRDCs. U.S. Owned and Foreign Companies permitted to register.

Procurement Contract Companies registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) and determined to be responsible. In some circumstances, eligibility may be restricted to small businesses.

OTA A nontraditional defense contractor, or a traditional defense contractor that will invest at least 1/3rd of the total cost of the prototype, or by Senior Procurement Executive exception.


Governing Regulations

Challenge Challenge rules

Section 2374a of Title 10 of the United States Code

Procurement Contract Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

OTA United States Contract Law

Section 2371, Title 10 U.S.C

As applicable, other laws/regulations


Value

Challenge One lump sum “prize”

Procurement Contract Variety of contract types: FFP to CPFF, incentives, indefinite types

OTA Determined by the terms of the agreement. Fixed-price and cost types.


Intellectual Property Rights

Challenge IP rights remain with the participant, unless special terms included.

Procurement Contract Contractor gets title and the Government gets license rights. 3 possible licenses:-1) Unlimited (may grant to 3rd parties)-2) Limited (no grant to 3rd parties)-3) Government Purpose (right to use within the Government without restriction. Right to authorize 3rd parties to use for any Government purpose.

OTA Determined by the terms of the agreement.


ProcessChallenge 1) Development/Submission of End

Product or Concept2) Evaluation3) Award

Procurement Contract 1) Submission of Proposal 2) Evaluation3) Award4) Development/Submission of End

ProductCooperative Agreement 1) Submission of Proposal

2) Evaluation3) Negotiation and Award4) Development/Submission of End

Product

*Notably in Challenges, the submission of an End Product does not guarantee payment

joint program executive office for chemical and biological defense uniform integrated protection...

Documents

public release distribution

provisional protection

collective protection

lauretta welch uipe

joint force

protection jpm p overview

jpeo jpm protection

protection vision vision