jolene hamm board of human sciences benchmark survey

13
JOLENE HAMM Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey

Upload: anthony-townsend

Post on 17-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: JOLENE HAMM Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey

JOLENE HAMM

Board of Human Sciences

Benchmark Survey

Page 2: JOLENE HAMM Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey

Reporting for 2009 Survey

Respondents 46 institutions reporting

25BOHS 40 CAFCS

Contacted 144 institutions (CAFCS & BOHS) 32 % response rate

Page 3: JOLENE HAMM Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey

Contact Details

Contacted 144 institutions Minimum of 3 times by email Minimum of 2 times by phone Weekly correspondences with Dr. Jorgensen and Dr.

Martin providing update. FAEIS hours contributed to this project:

February-May 2010 568 approximate hours

Page 4: JOLENE HAMM Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey

BoHS Survey Amendments

Institutions contacted to confirm continuation of CIP codes from previous year

Continued use of 00.9999: Total Combined/Unclassified/Multidiscipline

Changed name from “the BOHS Benchmarking Survey” to the “Human Sciences Survey”

Initial use of “Unable to Report” option

Page 5: JOLENE HAMM Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey
Page 6: JOLENE HAMM Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey
Page 7: JOLENE HAMM Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey
Page 8: JOLENE HAMM Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey

Consecutively Reporting Institutions

Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University

Auburn University

Baylor University

Bradley University

Colorado State University

Eastern Illinois University

Florida State University

Iowa State University

Kansas State University

Louisiana Tech University

North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University

Oklahoma State University

University of Wyoming

Oregon State University

Purdue University

San Francisco State University

Stephen F. Austin State University

Tarleton State University

University of Akron

University of Arkansas

University of Georgia

University of Kentucky

University of Missouri

University of Nebraska- Lincoln

University of North Carolina at Greensboro

University of Wisconsin- Madison

N= 24

Page 9: JOLENE HAMM Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey

Top Reasons for Reporting

Availability of Results in Report BuilderAssisting with peer comparison Availability of the “Unable to Report” option

Page 10: JOLENE HAMM Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey

Top 5 Reasons for Non-reporting

Loss of personnel for reporting purposesTransitioning collegesAvailability of data to specificityUnable to donate time of personnel to

provide reportDid not feel survey benefited institution

Page 11: JOLENE HAMM Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey

Next Year

Continue to increase number of institutions reporting

Maintain number of consecutively reporting institutions

Page 12: JOLENE HAMM Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey

FAEIS2002-2010 Student Survey Participant for BOHS Institutions

Page 13: JOLENE HAMM Board of Human Sciences Benchmark Survey

Questions