journal of biomedical therapy infectious diseases

Upload: frank-nava

Post on 06-Jul-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    1/28

    Volume 2, Number 3 )  2008

    Therapy 

    Biomedical

    Infectious

    Diseases• The Immune System, Our Personal Bodyguard

    • Theories of Immunosenescence and Infection

    Integrating Homeopathyand Conventional Medicine

     d  2.00 • US $ 2.00 • CAN $ 3.00

    Journal of  

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    2/28

    In Focu s  The Immune System, Our Personal Bodyguard  . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

    W hat E l s e I s N e w ?   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10

    From t h e P rac t i c eAcute Recurrent Otitis Media . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

     Mar ke t i ng Yo u r P ra c t i c eManaging Expenses and Prices in the Medical Practice  . . . . 14

    Ref r e sh Your Homotox ico logyTheories of Immunosenescence and Infection:

    Cytomegalovirus, Inammation, and Homotoxicology . . . . 16

     A round t h e Gl ob e Advanced IAH Lecturer’s Trainings East and West . . . . . . . . . 19

    P r a c t i c a l P r o t o c o l s  Bioregulatory Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections . . . . . . 20

     Me e t t h e Exp e r t Dr. Ivo Bianchi  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

    Re s e a r ch High l i gh t s  

    Engystol: A Homeopathic Medicationfor the Common Cold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

     Mak in g o f . . .From Plant to Bottle: The Production of

    Homeopathic Nasal Sprays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

     ) 

    ) 2

    Contents

    Published by/Verlegt durch: International Academy for Homotoxicology GmbH, Bahnackerstraße 16,

    76532 Baden-Baden, Germany, e-mail: [email protected]

    Editor in charge/verantwortlicher Redakteur: Dr. Alta A. Smit

    Print/Druck: VVA Konkordia GmbH, Dr.-Rudolf-Eberle-Straße 15, 76534 Baden-Baden, Germany

    © 2008 International Academy for Homotoxicology GmbH, Baden-Baden, Germany

    Cover photograph © Sebastian Kaulitzki/Fotolia.de

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    3/28

    Fighting Infections

     ) 

    Only a very small number of allthe millions of microbial spe-cies actually cause disease in hu-

    mans. Antibiotic therapy, used ap-

    propriately, has saved humankindfrom the scourge of severe infection,

    but it has also been abused, resulting

    in contaminated ground water, resis-

    tant strains of microbes, and eradi-

    cation of symbiotic bacteria that

    play a major role in our immune

    health.

    The early 21st century saw the

    emergence of the so-called hygiene

    hypothesis, as reported in this jour-

    nal. According to this hypothesis,Th2 mediated diseases such as aller-

    gies and cancers are increasing due

    to systematic eradication (through

    hygiene and vaccination) of mild

    bacterial and viral infections that

    drive Th1 responses. However, the

    hygiene hypothesis has a number of

    flaws: it does not account for the rise

    in Th1 related diseases, and the ex-

    posure of children to dirt has not

    eradicated allergy.1

    Meanwhile, it has become evident

    that we humans have an evolution-

    ary pact with certain infectious

    agents that not only stimulate Th1

    or Th2, but also – yes, you guessed

    it! – increase T reg cells through by-

    stander suppression to ensure opti-

    mal Th1/Th2 balance. These agents

    include helminths and certain myco-

    bacteria as well as the symbioticbacteria in our gut. It seems, there-

    fore, that whenever we use antibiot-

    ics to eradicate infectious agents, we

    risk killing off some of these old

    friends that are vital to immune bal-

    ance.

    Stimulating natural defenses against

    infection still seems to be the safestand most logical way to fight non-

    life threatening infections. Several

    antihomotoxic medications have

    been shown to strengthen the im-

    mune system: Engystol increases in-

    terferon gamma in vitro, has been

    shown to increase phagocytosis and,

    along with others like Gripp-Heel

    and Euphorbium compositum, has

    proven itself effective against a vari-

    ety of viruses.2-6

    In this issue, you will also find a

    summary of a study by Volker

    Schmiedel et al. on the effectiveness

    of Engystol in treating the common

    cold. We asked two specialists in im-

    munology and infectious diseases,

    Dr. Manfred Schmolz and Dr. Doris

    Ottendorfer, to write the focus arti-

    cle on the complex immunology of

    infectious disease. This focus article

    is complemented by a case study by

    Dr. Ivo Bianchi and examples of

    treatment protocols by Dr. Bert

    Hannosset, both practicing homo-

    toxicologists. Dr. Jhann Arturo, a

    clinical and experimental immunol-

    ogist, discusses the very interesting

    link between immunosenescence,

    chronic infection, and chronic in-

    flammation in the elderly and offers

    comprehensive treatment protocols.Managing expenses in the medical

    practice is an important subject for

    all practitioners, and Marc Deschler,

    our marketing specialist, has useful

    tips for you. Our Making of … series

    describes how homeopathic nasal

    sprays are produced. And last but

    not least, our new column  Meet theExpert presents a side of Dr. Ivo Bi-

    anchi that you probably haven’t seen

    before!

    Alta A. Smit, MD

    Dr. Alta A. Smit 

    References:

    1. Rook GA, Brunet LR. Old friends for break-

    fast. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35(7):841-842.

    2. Enbergs H. Effects of the homeopathic prep-

    aration Engystol on interferon-gamma pro-

    duction by human T-lymphocytes. Immunol

    Invest. 2006;35(1):19-27.

    3. Wagner H, Jurcic K, Doenicke A, RosenhuberE, Behrens N. Die Beeinflussung der Phago-

    zytosefähigkeit von Granulozyten durch

    homöopathische Arzneipräparate: in vitro-

    Tests und kontrollierte Einfachblindstudien.

     Arzneim.-Forsch./Drug Res. 1986;36(9):1421-

    1425.

    4. Glatthaar-Saalmüller B. In vitro evalua-

    tion of the antiviral effects of the homeo-

    pathic preparation Gripp-Heel on selected

    respiratory viruses. Can J Physiol Pharmacol.

    2007;85(11):1084-1090.

    5. Glatthaar-Saalmüller B, Fallier-Becker P. An-

    tiviral action of Euphorbium compositum

    and its components. Forsch Komplementärmed

    Klass Naturheilkd. 2001 Aug;8(4):207-212.

    6. Oberbaum M, Glatthaar-Saalmüller B, Stolt

    P, Weiser M. Antiviral activity of Engystol:

    an in vitro analysis. J Altern Complement Med.

    2005;11(5):855-862.

     ) 3

    Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    4/28Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

    The Immune System,Our Personal Bodyguard

    By Manfred Schmolz, PhD, and Doris Ottendorfer, PhD 

    The central role of the

    human immune system

    The complexity of our immune sys-

    tem evolved over millions of years

    to minimize the threat by pathogensand neoplasms. Although we nor-

    mally are not aware of its subtle

    functions as long as we enjoy our

    health, an early inflammatory reac-

    tion clearly denotes the beginning

    of the fight of our immune cells

    against invaders, such as viruses,

    bacteria, fungi, and even parasites.

    Close collaboration between innate

    and specific immunity ensures the

    elimination of the infectious agentby cellular and/or humoral immune

    responses. In some instances, long-

    lived immunity is generated. The

    aim of the present article is to briefly

    outline important mechanisms of

    immune reactions against infectious

    microorganisms. The molecular de-

    tails of these interactions are beyond

    the scope of this article, but they can

    easily be found in the reviews cited.

    Structural organization of the

    human immune system

    Whereas innate immune responses

    are immediately available on contact

    with pathogens, the activation of

    specific immunity takes longer. The

    T and B cells, with their highly di-

    verse antigen receptors, play a cen-

    tral role in this activation.

    All immune cells originate from he-matopoietic stem cells in the bone

    marrow. Under the influence of nu-

    merous cytokines and growth fac-

    tors, the so-called pluripotent stem

    cells differentiate in a multistep pro-

    cess into several types of granulo-

    cytes (i.e., neutrophils, eosinophils,and basophils), each of which has

    specialized functions; monocytes

    (which differentiate to the tissue

    macrophages when settling in dif-

    ferent organs); natural killer (NK)

    cells; and B and T cells.

    The lymph nodes are localized as a

    large network throughout the hu-

    man body to sample antigens from

    the tissues via the lymph vessels.

    Lymph nodes are usually the site ofsensitization of T cells by antigen-

    presenting cells (APCs). The muco-

    sa-associated lymphoid tissue

    (MALT) includes the Peyer’s patches

    along the gastrointestinal tract, the

    tonsils, and the nasal- and bronchus-

    associated lymphoid tissue. All of

    these tissues form highly organized

    structures supporting the interaction

    of antigens with the few available

    antigen-specific lymphocytes circu-

    lating in the blood or the lymph.

    The MALT is essential as a protec-

    tive barrier at the highly vulnerable

    mucosal surfaces.1-3

    Innate immunity:

    a powerful first-line defense

    The first defense against infectious

    agents starts when the invader is rec-

    ognized by phagocytes that nonspe-cifically engulf and digest patho-

    gens. Even this most primitive

    defense function is a highly com-

    plex cellular process.4,5 Two differ-

    ent types of phagocytosis exist: the

    removal of pathogens and the elimi-

    nation of apoptotic tissue cells(apoptosis means programmed cell

    death). The former causes an inflam-

    matory alarm response, whereas the

    latter (which is, for example, neces-

    sary during embyrogenesis) prevents

    inflammation. Moreover, phagocy-

    tosis bridges innate and adaptive

    immunity, through antigen presen-

    tation.

    The engulfment of pathogens by

    neutrophils and macrophages dis-criminates between diverse particles

    through an array of receptors ex-

    pressed on their surface. Among

    these receptors are several for com-

    plement proteins, combinations of

    scavenger receptors, and numerous

    integrins, described extensively by

    Stuart and Ezekowitz in 2008.5 

    Most of these receptors are able to

    recognize both pathogens and al-

    tered-self ligands, such as apoptotic

    cells.

    After receptor ligation by the parti-

    cle, a “phagosome” is formed within

    the phagocyte. This phagosome then

    fuses with a lysosome, generating

    the “phagolysosome.” In the latter,

    the final destruction of pathogens

    occurs by an arsenal of degrading

    enzymes, oxygen radicals, bacteri-

    cides, etc. Proteomic analysis has re-vealed that phagosomes contain

    more than 600 different types of

     ) 

    I n F o c u s  

    ) 4

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    5/28Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

     ) 

    I n F o c u s  

    proteins. A key role of phagolyso-

    somes is to provide, by only partial

    degradation, the antigenic ligands

    for the stimulation of the T and B

    cells (which are further described

    later in the article).

    Role of toll-like receptors in

    antimicrobial immunity

    The family of receptors called toll-

    like receptors (TLRs) is essential for

    the discrimination between self and

    nonself structures, a central require-

    ment for the immune system. This

    topic was extensively reviewed by

    Akira and Takeda6 and Iwasaki and

    Medzhitov.7

    The TLRs sense microbial infections

    as a “general danger” to the body,

    recognizing conserved molecular

    structures unique to the microbial

    world and widely invariant among

    the single classes of pathogens. Each

    of these pathogen-associated mo-

    lecular patterns (PAMPs) is detected

    by a different TLR subtype (e.g.,

    TLR4 recognizes lipopolysaccha-

    rides). The PAMPs are among thestrongest stimuli for immune cells.

    The signal transduction pathways

    that TLRs activate in different im-

    mune cell subtypes result in a multi-

    tude of antimicrobial and inflamma-

    tory responses, which usually lead

    to the elimination of the pathogen.

    The TLRs also do the following:

    1.  help recruit cells to infected

    sites by triggering the release of

    chemotactic mediators (chemo-

    kines)

    2.  help make functionally mature

    APCs

    3.  contribute to antiviral immu-

    nity8 

    Therefore, PAMPs very efficiently

    link innate and adaptive immune

    mechanisms, thus potentiating de-

    fense efficacy.

    The neutrophil:

    a prototypic cell type of anti-

    bacterial defense

    Neutrophil granulocytes are the

    most abundant cells of the immune

    system. Beyond being pure “eaters

    and killers,” they are recognized as

    major contributors to the overall

    regulation of immune responses.

    Neutrophils also contribute to the

    recruitment, activation, and pro-

    gramming of APCs by producing an

    array of cytokines, chemokines, lipid

    mediators, and, last but definitely

    not least, an arsenal of cytolytic

    agents for killing ingested patho-

    gens, as described by Nathan.9

     Among the latter are bactericidal

    peptides (defensins), oxygen radicals

    produced by myeloperoxidase, and

    others. Lactoferrin, or lipocalin, can

    slow down bacterial growth by de-

    pleting iron at the site of infection.

    In addition, neutrophils secrete fac-

    tors that assist B-cell maturation and

    proliferation and can also function

    as prominent suppressors of T-cell

    function (e.g., by secreting prosta-glandins).

    The role of complement

    proteins in immunity

    The complement system deserves at-

    tention in that this proteolytic ma-

    chinery, resembling in its cascade-

    like mode of action the coagulation

    cascade, effectively interlinks innate

    and specific immune mechanisms.

    First described as a heat-sensitive

    factor in fresh serum that is able to

    “complement” the effects of specific

    antibodies in the lysis of bacteria,

    the complement system now repre-

    sents a system of more than 30 se-

    rum proteins and cell surface recep-

    tors. An excellent review on

    complement concerning numerous

    immunoregulatory roles beyond the

    killing of bacteria has been pub-lished by Carroll.10

    Messaging between cells of the

    innate immune system

    To accomplish the antibacterial de-

    fense during innate immune reac-

    tions, the phagocytosis of microbial

    pathogens is accompanied by the re-

    lease of several messenger molecules,

    such as arachidonic acid metabolites

    (prostaglandins and leukotrienes),

    chemokines, cytokines, and proteas-

    es. Only a fine-tuned release of these

    hundreds of mediators coordinates

    the activities of different immune

    cells sufficiently to successfully clear

    the tissues of almost all infectious

    microorganisms before they can cre-

    ate problems.

    Initiation of an antigen-specific

    immune response against

    infection

    In many cases, the first line of de-

    fense established by the phagocytes

    is not enough, especially when mi-

    crobial and viral pathogens evolved

    to exhibit sophisticated survival

    strategies. In such cases, antigen-

    specific immune responses are initi-ated. Even these begin with phago-

    cytosis, although, as reviewed

    recently by Finlay and McFadden,11 

    some pathogens may resist phagocy-

    tosis and others interfere with anti-

    gen presentation. Those pathogens

    that resist digestion and multiply

    within the phagocytes constitute a

    tremendous threat to the body (e.g.,

    mycobacteria and parasitic helminth

    worms). Despite their subversive ac-

    tivities, these pathogens can be de-

    stroyed by more specific cellular im-

    mune mechanisms. There is

    antibody-dependent cytotoxicity

    and enforced cellular immunity; the

    latter results in a profound activa-

    tion of macrophages, boosting them

    to destroy even microorganisms as

    resistant as mycobacteria. Such re-

    enforcement usually involves thecells from the antigen-specific part

    of the immune system, the T and B

    cells.

     ) 5

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    6/28Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

     ) 

    I n F o c u s  

    T and B lymphocytes are

    responsible for generating

    antigen-specific immune

    responses

    True antigen specificity resides inthe T and B lymphocytes, which are

    able to recognize antigens through

    highly specific membrane-bound

    receptors. Each cell has peculiar re-

    ceptors that recognize only one an-

    tigen. Yet, hypothetically, all B and

    T lymphocytes together are able to

    respond to virtually any antigen in

    the world. The antigen size may

    range from small chemical structures

    to highly complex molecules. Thereceptors of both cell types recog-

    nize only a small part of large anti-

    gens, referred to as the epitope.

    Complex antigens usually consist of

    more than one epitope. This tremen-

    dous variability in T- and B-cell

    specificities is achieved by DNA re-

    arrangement.12,13

    Antigens are internalized and pro-

    cessed to smaller fragments, which

    are then presented at the surface of

    APCs to “naïve” T cells, teaching

    the latter about the current antigen

    load. Compared with T cells, B cells

    do respond to nondigested epitopes.

    The surface structures to which the

    antigens or the fragments are at-

    tached are the proteins of the major

    histocompatibility complex (MHC),

    of which 2 classes are highly impor-

    tant for immune and tissue cells:class I (MHC-I) and class II (MHC-

    II).

    Antigen presentation by MHCs

    Recognition of antigens in the bind-

    ing grooves of MHC molecules by

    specific T-cell receptors (TCRs) is

    the central event to T-cell activation.MHC-I, found on all cells of the hu-

    man body, was originally described

    as transplantation antigen(s), being

    the cause for organ rejection. The

    natural function of MHC-I is to

    sample antigens from within the

    cells (e.g., during infection [viruses

    or intracellular bacteria] or tumori-

    genesis).14 The recognition of anti-

    gens presented by MHC-I molecules

    leads to the activation of cytotoxic Tcells (CTLs) bearing the CD8 sur-

    face marker (CD8+ CTLs).

    The MHC-II proteins are found ex-

    clusively on cells of the immune sys-

    tem (e.g., macrophages, B cells, and

    dendritic cells [DCs]). The DCs are

    recognized as the most efficient

    APCs to stimulate naïve T cells. The

    DCs seem to decide which type of

    T-cell response is induced by differ-

    ent antigens (Reis e Sousa15  and

    Shortman and Naik16  provide re-

    views). In contrast to MHC-I mole-

    cules, MHC-II molecules sample

    antigens from the extracellular space

    to activate CD4-positive (CD4+) T-

    helper (Th) cells.

    Effector/inflammatory CD4+

    Th cells and cytotoxic CD8 T

    cellsViruses are crucial pathogens be-

    cause they hide and multiply inside

    susceptible tissue cells. Antibodies

    neutralize viruses only outside cells

    (i.e., before they enter target cells or

    when they are released by these cells

    after replication). The elimination of

    virus-infected host cells is, therefore,a real challenge for the immune sys-

    tem.

    Evolution enabled infectious patho-

    gens (i.e., viruses, bacteria, and para-

    sites) to develop improved strategies

    to override the immune defense,

    which, in turn, improved its effector

    mechanisms to destroy even these

    pathogens. This is the reason why

    we have specialized populations of

    T cells, such as CTLs and various Thcells.

    Basically, CD4+ T-cell activation is

    initiated by the interaction of the

    antigen receptor (TCR) with anti-

    gen/MHC-II complexes on APC

    surfaces. Antigen/MHC-II com-

    plexes trigger a complex concert of

    intracellular signals, activating a

    whole series of genes that control

    the proliferation, differentiation, and

    effector functions of T cells. Anti-

    gen-specific T-cell activation is initi-

    ated only when these signals are

    strong enough.17 When a T cell is

    activated, it proliferates to give a

    clone, with each clone cell having

    the same TCR specificity as the par-

    ent cell. Notably, proliferation needs

    several growth factors (e.g., the very

    well-known interleukin [IL] 2). IL-2

    is the prototype of a T-cell growthfactor and acts to promote prolifera-

    tion and differentiation of antigen-

    activated T cells.18,19

    ) 6

    Bacteria display a wide diversity of

    shapes and sizes. Here: Salmonella

    typhimurium (red) invading cultured

    human cells.

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    7/28Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

     ) 

    I n F o c u s  

    CD4+ T cells activate cellular

    immunity

    A core function of CD4+ T cells in

    antibacterial defense is the re-en-

    forcement of tissue macrophages tobetter kill intracellular parasites and

    bacteria that otherwise may survive

    phagocytosis and use these cells as

    incubators. Macrophage activation

    by T cells is essential to cellular im-

    munity against pathogens, such as

    leishmania and mycobacteria. This

    activation of macrophages depends

    on cytokines from activated CD4

    Th cells, most importantly interfer-

    on (IFN) γ, which is also providedby NK cells. Other cytokines sup-

    porting cell-mediated immunity are

    mediators, such as IL-12 and IL-18,

    which are produced by activated

    APCs in a positive feedback loop.

    Macrophages activated in this man-

    ner express a higher ability to pres-

    ent antigens, provide stronger co-

    stimulation, and secrete more

    activating cytokines (e.g., IL-1, IL-6,

    and IL-10) or tumor necrosis factor

    a. Moreover, the CD4+ T lympho-

    cytes are important helper cells for

    antiviral CTLs. CD4+ T cells are

    not only crucial for macrophage ac-

    tivation but also provide help to B

    cells by secreting growth factors fa-

    voring antibody production.

    Cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and

    NK cells kill virus-infected and

    tumor cells

    Virus-specific CD8+ CTLs are the

    major effector cells for eliminatingestablished viral infections. NK cells

    also lyse virus-infected cells and tu-

    mor cells. Therefore, both cell types

    are often summarized as cytotoxic

    lymphocytes. It seems that both cell

    types share common mechanisms

    for antiviral and antitumor de-

    fense.20-22  For example, both cell

    types secrete the cytotoxic protein

    perforin, along with granzymes. To-

    gether, they kill infected cells andtumor cells on cell-to-cell contact.

    This is a thoroughly controlled pro-

    cess to kill only the diseased target

    cell (not healthy neighbor cells).

    The most important difference be-

    tween the CTL and NK cells is that

    NK cells do not have a TCR; NK

    cells recognize virally infected cells

    by their ability to recognize and lyse

    virally infected cells by other recep-

    tors showing a more general speci-

    ficity for pathogen-induced changes

    in tissue cells (e.g., intracellular in-

    fection or neoplasia). Other NK cell

    receptors possess inhibitory activity,

    enabling a close control of cell kill-

    ing.23 

    The major advantage that NK cells

    have over antigen-specific CD8+ T

    cells is that they kill target cells

    without the need for clonal expan-sion (i.e., without a “lag” phase).  ) 7

    Therefore, NK cells effectively limit

    the early spread of infection.

    CD8+ CTLs recognize antigens by

    their TCR in association with MHC-

    I molecules. In addition, similar toCD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells need

    clonal expansion to establish full ef-

    fector functions.

    Role of IFN synthesis in

    antiviral immunity

    In addition to cell contact-depen-

    dent killing mechanisms, soluble

    mediators released during viral in-

    fection of cells directly stimulate the

    production of IFNs, of which type 1IFNs (a and β) possess the strongest

    direct antiviral activity. Type 1 IFNs

    are produced by many cell types and

    cause an “antiviral state” in the in-

    fected cells; this state is character-

    ized by inhibition of viral replica-

    tion and cell proliferation. Type 1

    IFNs also enhance NK cell activity

    to lyse target cells and improve anti-

    gen presentation in APCs.

    Multiple ways to control T-cell

    activation

    T-cell responses do not only con-

    sume lots of energy by clonal ex-

    pansion but are also highly power-

    ful when it comes to destroying

    tissue cells. Taken together, the costs

    of false alarms are high; therefore,

    such a process needs to be controlled

    strictly.

     A macrophage forming two processes

    to phagocytize two smaller particles.

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    8/28Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

     ) 

    I n F o c u s  

    ) 8

     ) 

    I n F o c u s  

    The ability of T cells to become ac-

    tivated primarily depends on the

    signal strength received by the TCR;

    therefore, only those T cells show-

    ing the best binding fit to the anti-gen will become fully activated. An-

    other potent means to effectively

    control T-cell activation is by “co-

    stimulation.” This is accomplished

    by a series of costimulating counter-

    receptors on the APC surface bind-

    ing to ligands on T cells. These add

    positively and negatively to the reg-

    ulation of the proliferation and dif-

    ferentiation of a given T-cell clone.

    One of the best characterized co-stimulation signals is induced by the

    CD28/CD80 receptor pair.24

    Finally, much progress has been

    made to characterize the functional

    diversity of T cells, leading to the

    current description of subpopula-

    tions such as the Th cells (Th1, Th2,

    and Th3) and the regulatory T cells

    (which have been extensively re-

    viewed by Kalinski and Moser25 and

    Belkaid26). Briefly, each of these

    subtypes of T cells expresses its own

    spectrum of activities and soluble

    mediators that it secretes. The Th1

    cells are involved in cell-mediated

    immunity, the Th2 cells support an-

    tibody production and participate in

    the induction of hypersensitivity,

    and the Th3 and Treg cells can gen-

    erally be seen as the protectors

    (“down-regulators”) against reac-tions that are too strong, outdated,

    or undesired. Interestingly, the deci-

    sion as to which type of T cell is

    generated is probably met largely by

    DCs, which are able to polarize

    nondifferentiated T cells toward

    these functional subtypes. This con-cept is a subject of continuing de-

    bate.25 

    Humoral immunity: the genera-

    tion of antibodies

    B cells are the only cells that pro-

    duce antibodies (immunoglobulins).

    As with T cells, each B cell is spe-

    cific for a particular epitope on an

    antigen (e.g., protein or carbohy-

    drate). Antigens are specifically rec-ognized by surface-anchored anti-

    bodies on these cells. By this B-cell

    receptor, antigens can be internal-

    ized. They are then broken down

    into fragments and displayed at the

    B-cell surface together with MHC-

    II to CD4+ Th cells, which subse-

    quently trigger the activation of the

    presenting B cell. Activated B cells

    develop into plasma cells, producing

    huge amounts of antibodies of the

    same specificity as the B-cell recep-

    tor on their surface originally en-

    coded. In the further course of the

    immune response, the interaction

    with T cells causes the B cells to

    switch their production from immu-

    noglobulin M (IgM), which is al-

    ways the first to be secreted, to the

    more versatile IgG.

    Effector functions of different

    antibody classes

    In humans, 5 different classes of im-

    munoglobulins, called isotypes, are

    known (i.e., IgM, IgG, IgA, IgE, andIgD). These immunoglobulins all

    have different structures and activi-

    ties. On primary activation, B cells

    first always synthesize IgM, peaking

    about 7 to 10 days after initial ex-

    posure. Because of its pentameric

    structure, representing 10 binding

    sites for antigen per IgM, IgM is

    particularly potent for agglutinating

    antigens, enhancing phagocytosis,

    and activating complement.At some point during B-cell activa-

    tion, these lymphocytes can switch

    from IgM to a different class of anti-

    bodies. The most prominent of these

    antibodies is IgG. Its capacity to

    “coat” bacteria to improve phagocy-

    tosis is called opsonization. IgG also

    neutralizes microbial toxins, blocks

    viral adherence to target cells, acti-

    vates complement, and is the main

    antibody found on repeated antigen

    contact.

    IgA, on the other hand, is the anti-

    body found primarily in mucus, co-

    lostrum, and milk. It protects against

    respiratory and gastrointestinal tract

    infectious agents.

    Finally, IgE is produced in response

    to parasites and is also a characteris-

    tic mediator of type 1 allergy. In

    both of these instances, IgE collabo-rates closely with Th2 cells to shape

    this particular type of immune re-

    sponse.27

    The elimination of viruses is a real

    challenge for the immune system.

         ©     S

       e    b   a   s    t    i   a   n    K   a

       u    l    i    t   z    k    i    /    F   o    t   o    l    i   a .    d   e

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    9/28Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

     ) 

    I n F o c u s  

    8. Kawai T, Akira S. Innate immune rec-

    ognition of viral infection.  Nat Immunol. 

    2006;7(2):131-137.

    9. Nathan C. Neutrophils and immunity: chal-

    lenges and opportunities.  Nat Rev Immunol. 

    2006;6(3):173-182.

    10. Carroll MC. The complement system in reg-

    ulation of adaptive immunity.  Nat Immunol. 

    2004;5(10):981-986.11. Finlay BB, McFadden G. Anti-immunol-

    ogy: evasion of the host immune system

    by bacterial and viral pathogens.  Cell.

    2006;124(4):767-782.

    12. Chaudhuri J, Alt FW. Class-switch recom-

    bination: interplay of transcription, DNA

    deamination and DNA repair. Nat Rev Immu- 

    nol. 2004;4(7):541-552.

    13. Schlissel MS. Regulating antigen-re-

    ceptor gene assembly.  Nat Rev Immunol.

    2003;3(11):890-899.

    14. Vyas JM, Van der Veen AG, Ploegh HL.

    The known unknowns of antigen process-

    ing and presentation.  Nat Rev Immunol.

    2008;8(8):607-618.15. Reis e Sousa C. Dendritic cells in a mature

    age. Nat Rev Immunol.  2006;6(6):476-483.

    16. Shortman K, Naik SH. Steady-state and in-

    flammatory dendritic-cell development.  Nat

    Rev Immunol. 2007;7(1):19-30.

    17. Acuto O, Bartolo VD, Michel F. Tailoring

    T-cell receptor signals by proximal nega-

    tive feedback mechanisms.  Nat Rev Immunol.

    2008;8(9):699-712.

    18. Waldmann TA. The biology of interleukin-2

    and interleukin-15: implications for cancer

    therapy and vaccine design. Nat Rev Immunol. 

    2006;6(8):595-601.

    19. Taniguchi T, Minami Y. The IL-2/IL-2 re-

    ceptor system: a current overview. Cell.1993;73(1):5-8.

    20. Voskoboinik I, Smyth MJ, Trapani JA.

    Perforin-mediated target-cell death and

    immune homeostasis.  Nat Rev Immunol.

    2006;6(12):940-952.

    21. Trapani JA, Smyth MF. Functional signifi-

    cance of the perforin/granzyme cell death

    pathway. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(10):735-

    747.

    22. Orange JS. Formation and function of the

    lytic NK-cell immunological synapse. Nat Rev

    Immunol. 2008;8(9):713-725.

    23. Kumar V, McNerney ME. A new self: MHC-

    class-I-independent natural-killer-cell self-

    tolerance.  Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5(5):363-

    374.

    24. Acuto O, Michel F. CD28-mediated co-stim-

    ulation: a quantitative support for TCR sig-

    nalling.  Nat Rev Immunol.  2003;3(12):939-

    951.

    25. Kalinski P, Moser M. Consensual immunity:

    success-driven development of T-helper-1

    and T-helper-2 responses.  Nat Rev Immunol.

    2005;5(3):251-260.

    26. Belkaid Y. Regulatory T cells and infec-

    tion: a dangerous necessity. Nat Rev Immunol.

    2007;7(11):875-888.

    27. Anthony RM, Rutitzky LI, Urban JF Jr, Sta-

    decker MJ, Gause WC. Protective immune

    mechanisms in helminth infection.  Nat Rev

    Immunol. 2007;7(12):975-987.

    Antibodies usually neutralize viruses

    through binding to their surface,

    blocking the virus from entering the

    host cell. In addition, some viral in-

    fections lead to the expression of

    viral proteins on the surface of in-

    fected cells. These may bind virus-

    specific antibodies, leading to com-

    plement-mediated lysis, or activate a

    subset of NK cells to lyse infected

    cells through antibody-dependent

    cellular cytotoxicity.

    Immune cell memory

    Adaptive immune responses lead to

    a state of long-lived immunity,

    which is established by the genera-tion of memory cells in the T- and

    B-cell lineage, exhibiting the same

    antigen specificity as their parent

    cells. By contrast, innate defense

    does not create memory. The advan-

    tage of memory cells is that they can

    be activated upon any repeated con-

    tact with their specific antigen much

    more rapidly than on first contact,

    which helps to keep reinfection

    down efficiently.

    Intercellular communication

    during infection

    The communication between differ-

    ent immune cells to establish a well-

    coordinated response during antimi-

    crobial defense, as previously

    described, would be impossible

    without the help of the vast array of

    soluble mediators that evolution

    elaborated to fine-tune immune re-

    sponses. They comprise a large num-

    ber of chemokines, cytokines, and

    growth factors; there are also whole

    series of lipid-derived mediators,

    proteases, antiproteases, coagulation

    cascade-derived mediators, kinins,

    and even neurotransmitters. All of

    these bind to receptors on the cells

    of the immune system and modify

    their reactions in a highly controlledmanner. Most of these mediators

    form positive- and negative-feed- ) 9

    back signaling loops that timely ad-

     just the general type and the extent

    of response to the current needs,

    which in fact differ substantially be-

    tween the different types and phases

    of a defense reaction.

    Concluding remarks

    Immunological knowledge is grow-

    ing fast. The recent discovery of the

    TLRs and their functions and of

    functionally different DC types, the

    ever-growing list of lymphocyte

    subpopulations displaying different

    functions, and the enormous amount

    of newly discovered mediators have

    contributed tremendously to ourunderstanding of antimicrobial im-

    munity. In addition, these discover-

    ies are helping us understand the

    switch from well-regulated immune

    responses to detrimental conditions

    such as chronic inflammation. Read-

    ers are encouraged to consult one or

    more of the articles cited herein,

    which will provide a deeper guide

    into the complex and highly fasci-

    nating world of the immune system,our personal bodyguard.|

    References

    1. Coombes JL, Powrie F. Dendritic cells in in-

    testinal immune regulation. Nat Rev Immunol . 

    2008;8(6):435-446.2. Sansonetti PJ. War and peace at mucosal

    surfaces.  Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4(12):953-

    964.

    3. Holt PG, Strickland DH, Wikström ME,

     Jahnsen FL. Regulation of immunological

    homeostasis in the respiratory tract.  Nat Rev

    Immunol. 2008;8(2):142-152.

    4. Stuart LM, Ezekowitz RA. Phagocytosis: el-

    egant complexity. Immunity. 2005;22(5):539-

    550.

    5. Stuart LM, Ezekowitz RA. Phagocytosis and

    comparative innate immunity: learning on the

    fly. Nat Rev Immunol.  2008;8(2):131-141.

    6. Akira S, Takeda K. Toll-like receptor signal-

    ling. Nat Rev Immunol.  2004;4(7):499-511.7. Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptor

    control of the adaptive immune responses.

     Nat Immunol.  2004;5(10):987-995.

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    10/28

     10

    Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

     ) 

    W h a t E l s e I s N e w ?  

    F O R P R O F E S S I O N A L U S E O N L Y

    The information contained in this journal is meant for professional use only, is meant to convey general and/or specific worldwide scientific information relating to the

    products or ingredients referred to for informational purposes only, is not intended to be a recommendation with respect to the use of or benefits derived from the

    products and/or ingredients (which may be different depending on the regulatory environment in your country), and is not intended to diagnose any illness, nor is it

    intended to replace competent medical advice and practice. IAH or anyone connected to, or participating in this publication does not accept nor will it be liable

    for any medical or legal responsibility for the reliance upon or the misinterpretation or misuse of the scientific, informational and educational content of the

    articles in this journal.

    The purpose of the Journal of Biomedical Therapy is to share worldwide scientific information about successful protocols from orthodox and complementary practi-

    tioners. The intent of the scientific information contained in this journal is not to “dispense recipes” but to provide practitioners with “practice information” for a better

    understanding of the possibilities and limits of complementary and integrative therapies.

    Some of the products referred to in articles may not be available in all countries in which the journal is made available, with the formulation described in any article or

    available for sale with the conditions of use and/or claims indicated in the articles. It is the practitioner’s responsibility to use this information as applicable

    and in a manner that is permitted in his or her respective jurisdiction based on the applicable regulatory environment. We encourage our readers to sharetheir complementary therapies, as the purpose of the Journal of Biomedical Therapy is to join together like-minded practitioners from around the globe.

    Written permission is required to reproduce any of the enclosed material. The articles contained herein are not independently verified for accuracy or truth. They have

    been provided to the Journal of Biomedical Therapy by the author and represent the thoughts, views and opinions of the article ’s author.

    No scientific proof of the

    health benefits of drinking

    more water 

    How much water should you drinkin a day? According to common re-

    commendations, eight glasses, or

    approximately one and a half liters.

    It remains debatable, however,

    whether increased water consump-

    tion is necessary for health, aids in

    weight loss, or keeps skin firm. In an

    analysis of all available clinical stud-

    ies on this topic, scientists from

    Philadelphia (USA) recently con-

    cluded that such claims don’t holdwater. True, the kidneys get a good

    rinsing, but there was no evidence

    of clinical benefits to kidney or oth-

    er organ functions.

     Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(6):

    1041-1043

    Short arms, short memory? 

    Alzheimer’s is more common in in-

    dividuals with short arms and legs

    than in people with long extremi-ties. At least, that’s the conclusion of

    a recent American study of approxi-

    mately 2,800 older subjects (average

    age = 72). 480 of the participants

    developed dementia during the five-

    year observation period. The risk of

    dementia was significantly higher

    among women with short arms and

    legs. In men, however, only arm

    length correlated with dementia

    risk. A possible explanation suggest-ed by the researchers is that poor

    nutrition and lack of medical care in

    childhood might not only produce

    shorter limbs but also increase the

    risk of dementia in later life.

     Neurology. 2008;70(19):1818-1826 

     Autohemotherapy helpful

    in heart failure

    In certain patients with chronic

    heart failure, autohemotherapy canreduce the risk of death or hospital-

    ization, according to a study of

    2,426 patients with chronic heart

    failure. Over a period of 22 weeks,

    participants received at least eight

    intragluteal injections containing ei-

    ther their own blood or a placebo.

    Primary endpoints in the study were

    death or admission to a hospital.

    Autohemotherapy significantly de-

    layed both endpoints in patientswho had not yet suffered a heart at-

    tack and in patients with NYHA

    Stage II cardiac insufficiency.

    Lancet. 2008;371(9608):228-236 

     A recent study has shown that individu-

    als with long arms have a lower risk of

    developing dementia than people with

    short extremities.

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    11/28

     ) 11

    Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

     ) 

    W h a t E l s e I s N e w ?  

    Coffee for liver protection? 

    Coffee protects the liver against can-

    cer and the effect increases with the

    amount of coffee consumed, accord-ing to an Italian meta-analysis of 11

    original studies. The study’s find-

    ings are significant: Regular coffee

    consumption reduces the risk of liv-

    er cancer by almost 40 percent. The

    protective effect was evident even in

    subgroups of patients with pre-ex-

    isting hepatitis or cirrhosis.

    This effect may be due to the pres-

    ence of cafestol and kahweol diter-penes in coffee. In animal experi-

    ments, these compounds have been

    shown to modulate enzymes active

    in the detoxification of carcinogens.

    In vitro, caffeine also demonstrates

    antioxidant effects and inhibits lipid

    peroxidation. It has also been asso-

    ciated with improvement in liver

    transaminases.

    Hepatology. 2007;46(2):430-435

    Gastroenterologe. 2008;3(1):53-54 

    “Spectator stress” can be

    dangerous! 

    Half of Germany sat in front of the

    TV, on the edge of their seats as theGerman team competed in the title

    match of the European soccer cham-

    pionship. That’s not necessarily safe

    entertainment, according to a study

    conducted in Germany during the

    World Cup two years ago. Emergen-

    cy physicians prospectively assessed

    cardiovascular events occurring in

    patients in the greater Munich area.

    They discovered that the statistical

    probability of suffering a cardiovas-cular event doubled when the Ger-

    man team was playing. Men were

    affected significantly more often

    than women, and the risk was espe-

    cially high among those with preex-

    isting coronary heart disease. So the

    physicians urged heart patients to

    take preventive measures, such as

    taking appropriate medication, be-

    fore the German team’s games or

    similar important events. They also

    said that behavioral therapy to im-

    prove stress management could be

    helpful in the long term.

     N Engl J Med. 2008;358(5):475-483

    Hunger hormone makes

     foods look more appetizing

    The hunger hormone ghrelin

    (“growth hormone release induc-ing”) not only makes people feel

    hungry but also heightens responses

    to food stimuli, as Canadian scien-

    tists recently discovered. According

    to their study, the hormone (formed

    in the epithelium of the empty stom-

    ach) does more than simply encour-

    age eating by causing sensations of

    hunger – it also makes specific brain

    regions more receptive to visual

    stimuli from food, which increasesthe urge to indulge in eating for

    pleasure. According to the study,

    ghrelin works on reward centers in

    the brain that are also affected by

    drug dependency, making what we

    call “hunger” nothing more than an

    eating addiction of sorts. The au-

    thors, however, warn against using

    ghrelin blocking medications as

    therapy for obesity, considering it

    too risky, since ghrelin affects brain

    regions where emotions and motiva-

    tions arise.

    Cell Metabolism. 2008;7(5):400-409

    Let’s have another cup …

    Regular coffee consumption protects

    the liver against cancer, and the effect

    increases with the amount of coffee

    consumed.

    The hormone ghrelin not only gives

     you a sensation of hunger – it also

    makes food look simply irresistible …

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    12/28

     ) 

    F r o m t h e P r a c t i c e  

    Acute Recurrent Otitis Media

      By Ivo Bianchi, MD 

    ) 12

    Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

    Symptoms include otalgia that isoften very acute, usually wors-ens at night, and is sometimes ac-

    companied by nausea, vomiting, di-

    arrhea, and fever. Although acuteotitis media can occur at any age, it

    is most common between the ages

    of 3 months and 3 years, when the

    Eustachian tube is structurally and

    functionally immature and the

    mechanism that opens and drains

    the middle ear is less efficient. This

    condition is often stressful for the

    family and very painful for the child.

    According to recent surveys, antibi-

    otics and decongestants have not

    been proven to be of value. In my

    experience, homotoxicology and

    homeopathy offer a valid method of

    treating this common condition.

    Clinical case

    A young mother brought her two-

    year-old son to my office for recur-

    rent acute episodes of otitis media.These episodes were extremely fre-

    quent, especially during the cold,

    damp season, and required frequent

    administration of antibiotics. In one

    episode, otitis media was compli-

    cated by acute mastoiditis, requiring

    hospitalization of the child. Thesituation had become almost chron-

    ic, and the child often seemed off-

    balance. The family medical history

    included the mother with frequent

    seasonal rhinopharingitis and a pa-

    ternal uncle with allergic asthma.

    Upon examination, I found latero-

    cervical microadenopathy, reddened

    pharynx, and hyperaemic tonsillar

    membranes. Thoracic and abdomi-

    nal findings were normal. Generally,

    the child looked frail and thin but

    well-proportioned. He was gentle,

    shy, and timid.

    I asked the mother for additional

    clinical information, and she report-

    ed a normal childbirth with a birth

    weight of 3.5 kg. The child was

    breast-fed for 6 months. Ever since

    his first months, he has perspired

    profusely during sleep, especially inthe occipital region, and tended to

    sleep without bedclothes. He used

    to gnash his teeth during the night.

    He has always had (and still has) a

    tendency toward diarrhea.

    At this point, I had sufficient infor-

    mation to develop a homeopathicand homotoxicological treatment

    strategy based not only on the

    child’s clinical history and symp-

    toms but also on the homotoxico-

    logical constitution he presented.

    Therapy was based on the model of

    the three pillars of homotoxicology.

    1. Drainage:

    • Lymphomyosot: 8 drops

    morning and evening.

    2. Cellular activation and

    organ regulation:

    • Mucosa compositum:

    1 ampoule via the mucosa

    2 times a week for 3 months,

    increasing to once daily (in

    the evening) during upper

    respiratory infections (even

    in the early stage) to improve

    the structural condition of

    the upper respiratory tract.

    • Coenzyme compositum:

    ½ ampoule orally 2-3 times

    a week for 6 months,

    according to appetite levels

    and general condition.

    • Belladonna-Homaccord:

    ½ ampoule every 6-8 hours

    in acute ENT inflammatory

    conditions, especially if feveris present.

    Acute otitis media is a bacterial or viral infection of the

    middle ear. Pediatric cases are very common and usually

    recurrent. In children with a genetic-constitutional

    predisposition to this problem, every upper respiratory

    tract infection can be complicated by otitis media.

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    13/28Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

    Factors related to otitis media

     Anatomy of the inner ear 

    • Traumeel ampoules or Oteel:

    2 drops locally in the ear for

    inflammation and pain, every

    10-30 minutes during acute

    phases until improvement isnoted.

    3. Immunomodulation:

    • Echinacea compositum forte:

    ½ ampoule in the evening

    twice a week for 6 months,

    increasing to every 6 hours

    during acute upper respira-

    tory infections until im-

    provement is noted. This

    medication is our antibacte-rial support and immuno-

    modulator.

    • Psorinoheel: ½ ampoule

    orally in the evening for 6

    months, to stimulate the

    immune system.

    • Calcium carbonicum-Injeel:

    1 ampoule orally in the

    morning once a week, to

    strengthen the constitutional

    response.

    • Osteoheel: 2 tablets daily (1

    each, morning and evening)

    during the winter to

    strengthen the reactivity of

    the osteocartilaginous tissue.

    This therapeutic protocol may seem

    complicated. Rather than just a sim-

    ple therapy, it is a real strategic plan

    to fight the disease and its symp-

    toms, prevent complications, and

    stimulate general and local immuneresponses in order to prevent relaps-

    es. The mother was well-motivated

    and the whole therapy was adminis-

    tered correctly. After six months, the

    child had improved both in terms of

    localized symptoms and also more

    generally, in terms of appetite,

    strength, and mood. No other recur-

    rences were reported, and I then rec-

    ommended a simple maintenance

    therapy for the winter and earlyspring:

    • Lymphomyosot:

    8 drops morning and evening.

    • Mucosa compositum:1 ampoule via the mucous

    membranes 2 times a week.

    • Echinacea compositum forte: 

    ½ ampoule in the evening twice

    a week.

    • Calcium carbonicum-Injeel:

    1 ampoule orally in the morn-

    ing once a week.

    I continue to see the child every

    six months. Three years after the

    first consultation, he is in perfectshape physically and psychological-

    ly.|

    Common factors related toacute otitis

    Viral infections

    Bacterial infections

    Genetic-constitutionalfactors

    Anatomical factors

    Exposure to smokeor pollution

    Gastroesophageal reux

     ) 

    F r o m t h e P r a c t i c e  

    Vestibular

    cochlear nerve

    Eardrum Eustachian tube

    Cochlea

        ©     O

        O    Z    /    F   o    t   o    l    i   a .    d   e

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    14/28

    ) 14

     ) 

     M a r k e t i n g Yo u r P r a c t i c e

    Managing Expenses and Pricesin the Medical Practice

      By Marc Deschler   Marketing specialist 

    Office supplies and legal and ac-

    counting/tax preparation feesare often major entries. It can be

    well worth the effort to solicit com-

    peting bids and/or to renegotiate

    these costs. Be especially aware of

    how your spending on office sup-

    plies has changed over the last few

    years. You should also have logical

    explanations for any fluctuations in

    legal and accounting fees. To get an

    overview, I recommend making a

    list of costs accrued over a specific

    time period. Beyond your major ex-

    penses, don’t forget to add in what

    you spend on:

    • postage

    • telephone bills• oce cleaning and disinfection

    • business entertainment

    • service contracts

    • purchases up to $50

    • uniforms and linens

    • waiting room reading material

    • gifts and oce décor

    • incidental expenses and bank

    fees

    • other administrative expenses

    Your accountant should be able to

    provide a balance sheet showing

    this information. If there are any

    fluctuations you really cannot ac-

    count for, discuss them with youraccountant.

    Losses due to purchases

    Excessive expenses can occur in all

    aspects of a medical practice. Un-

    economical behavior, for which

    there are many possible reasons, is

    often to blame. How purchases are

    made in your practice, for example,

    is a potential cause of losses. Use the

    following checklist to analyze pur-chasing behavior in your practice.

    1.  Purchases are not planned. Sup-

    plies are often purchased only

    when they have already run out,

    when no one is likely to pay

    much attention to price and qual-

    ity.

    Have you ever asked yourself how much it costs to

    administer your practice? On average, administration

    costs can account for approximately ten percent of

    revenue. In this context, it is interesting to know which

    line items your national Bureau of Statistics includes

    under the heading “other costs.” Check to see whether

    you spot any potential for savings there.

    Have you ever analyzed the purchasing

    behavior in your practice?

     A few simple strategies can help you

    avoid unnecessary costs.

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    15/28

     ) 15

    2.  Work is delayed because sup-

    plies were not purchased in ad-

    vance and are not available

    when needed. (E.g., emergency

    trips to the pharmacy for in-

     jectable medications.)

    3.  Bulk purchases result in dis-

    counts but tie up too much

    capital for too long, or storage

    becomes a problem.

    4.  Opportunities for discounts for

    cash payments are frequently

    overlooked.

    5.  You always purchase from the

    same supplier as a matter of

    habit, without soliciting com-

    peting bids.6.  It doesn’t occur to you to split

    bulk orders with other practic-

    es.

    Checking any of the above indi-

    cates weaknesses in the manage-

    ment of your practice that you

    should think about. But before you

    make changes in your purchasing

    behavior, categorize your expenses

    to identify where your efforts willpay off. So-called ABC analysis is a

    time-tested mechanism that helps

    you analyze and determine the rel-

    ative budgetary impact of different

    items and suppliers. Here, as in

    many other areas, the 80/20 prin-

    ciple applies; that is, approximately

    20 percent of goods purchased ac-

    count for 80 percent of spending

    (category A, in ABC analysis) and

    merits special attention. Make a list

    of all the supplies you purchase,

    along with the price for each item

    and how much you use in a year,

    and then calculate the cost of a

    year’s supply of each. Now list the

    items in order of percentage of to-

    tal annual spending. The items that

    together account for 80 percent of

    your costs deserve a closer look.

    The others can be safely disregard-ed; they will take care of them-

    selves in any subsequent reorgani-

    zation.

    Discussing fees for services

    in your practice – what

    to do when patients are

    not accustomed to paying

    out-of-pocket? 

    “Management,” “marketing,” and

    “sales” are words many physicians

    are not accustomed to using, but I’m

    convinced that medical practices to-

    day are medical “service providers”

    and need to function like the com-

    mercial enterprises they are. To en-

    sure a reasonable income, a commer-cial venture must sell something and

    make its prices “palatable” to con-

    sumers. For this reason, talking

    about fees for your services should

    become a matter of course. Don’t be

    embarrassed to discuss the prices of

    additional services with your pa-

    tients. Broach the subject and ex-

    plain why there is an extra fee for a

    particular additional service that in-

    surance may not cover. Health andbeauty are very important in today’s

    society, so “selling” elective thera-

    peutic services is not very difficult if

    you simply keep a few rules in mind.

    It’s important that you initiate the

    conversation. Don’t wait for the pa-

    tient to bring up the subject of price,

    regardless of which one of you

    brought up the subject of treat-

    ment.

    Steps in the financial

    conversation:

    Step 1: Introduce the conversation

    by establishing a common basis.

    Make sure you both agree that the

    proposed treatment makes sense.

    Step 2: Make it clear that this ser-

    vice may not be covered by supple-mentary insurance. No big explana-

    tion is needed.

    Step 3: Next, present the advantag-

    es (some, not all of them!) of this

    course of treatment. At this stage,

    it’s especially important to remain

    calm and objective. Avoid giving the

    impression that you want to talk

    your patient into it.

    Step 4: Give the patient something

    to look at. You should have an infor-

    mation sheet at hand on each extra

    service you offer.

    Step 5: Now it’s time to discuss the

    fee. Never say, “The whole course of

    treatment will cost $400.” Of course

    your patient’s reaction will be, “Ican’t afford that!” Think about how

    to break the fee down into small in-

    stallments. For example, “I suggest

    starting with three sessions, each of

    which will cost $40. After that, we

    can see how you’re doing and de-

    cide whether or not to continue.”

    Your patient’s reaction? “$40 is rea-

    sonable, and I can always still change

    my mind.”

    Step 6: Now discuss additional ad-

    vantages for the patient.

    Step 7: Suggest that the patient take

    the brochure home and think about

    it. Don’t press for an immediate de-

    cision. This gives your patient a way

    out if s/he can’t commit to the ex-

    pense on the spot.

    Step 8: With your patient’s consent,

    say you’ll call to discuss how to pro-

    ceed.

    There is no objectionable wheeling

    and dealing in any of these steps.

    They simply make it easier for you

    to offer valuable therapies to your

    patients.|

    Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    16/28

    Introduction

    Aging is generally a complex pro-

    cess which forms part of the cycle of

    physiological cell growth where liv-

    ing organisms going through one ofthe phases of tissue evolution un-

    dergo the hardest and most irrevers-

    ible processes of tissue deterioration.

    This is based on cell wear and tear

    (increase in chromosomal and telo-

    meric alterations)1 and matrix wear

    and tear (protein and lymphatic de-

    terioration), accelerated catabolism

    (increase in post-transductional pro-

    tein changes and in oxidation with

    increased apoptosis), and loss of theregenerative capacity of tissues over

    time (loss of mitochondrial function

    and stem cell reparation).

    This progressive deterioration, con-

    sidered to be physiological, affects

    not only the internal organs but also

    the skin, the central nervous system,

    and the immune system. The in-

    volvement of the immune system af-

    fects the ability to attack microbes,

    tumors, chemical or physical agents,

    or toxins (by slowing it down, di-

    minishing it, down-regulating it, or

    preventing it altogether), compro-

    mising the organism’s general im-

    munity. This immune aging is known

    as immunosenescence, and it is par-

    ticularly important in current clini-

    cal practice, since an understanding

    of these subtle biological changes

    can provide us with the tools to car-ry out suitable immunotherapy in

    the clinical field.

    Changes in the immune system

    with aging

    The immune system consists of a

    complex network of cell subtypes,

    membrane receptors, chemical com-munication signals (cytokines and

    chemokines), and humoral defense

    elements (antibodies, complement,

    immune peptides) which together

    enable the defenses to work in har-

    mony, and other tissues such as the

    extracellular matrix, and the lym-

    phatic, neuroendrocrine, and meta-

    bolic systems to remain in homeo-

    stasis. The main features recognized

    to date in immunosenescence2  areshown in Table 1. For example, it

    has been observed that young indi-

    viduals have an adequate population

    of T lymphocytes producing inter-

    leukin (IL) 2, responsible for the

    clonal expansion of other T lym-

    phocytes. However, elderly individ-

    uals have T cells with low IL-2 pro-

    duction and consequently far slower

    T cell clonal expansion which gives

    rise to incomplete or reduced im-

    mune responses.3 These incomplete

    immune responses generally result

    in diseases: autoinflammation, auto-

    immunity, neoplastic processes (leu-

    kemias/lymphomas, cancer), or de-

    generative processes (Alzheimer’s

    disease).

    There are many factors which affect

    the TCD3+ cells in the elderly, but

    it is clear that one of the main typesof damage to TCD3+ cells is caused

    by oxygen free radicals resulting

    from oxidative stress. It is important

    to mention that despite having high

    levels of free radicals, elderly indi-

    viduals also appear to have high an-

    tioxidant levels in plasma.4

     Repeatedaccumulation and the increasingly

    chronic nature of the oxidative pro-

    cess therefore seem to cause the

    TCD3+ cells to become destabi-

    lized.

    Chronic inflammation and

    chronic infection in the elderly

    The most important impact of im-

    mune dysfunction in old age is,

    however, chronic inflammation (in-flamm-aging).5  New theories and

    studies demonstrate how persistent,

    chronic inflammation throughout

    life (including that related to birth)

    is responsible for morbidity in old

    age.6 The slow and on occasion im-

    perceptible production of inflamma-

    tory mediators such as C-reactive

    protein, fibrinogen, amyloid protein,

    and cytokines such as platelet-de-

    rived growth factor, IL-6, IL-10, tu-

    mor necrosis factor (TNF) a, and

    transforming growth factor β alters

    the vascular epithelium and causes

    tissues to become chronically in-

    flamed and to degenerate. The most

    important cause of this persistent in-

    flammation is infectious diseases

    which contribute to a chronic state

    of immune activation and, over time,

    immunodeficiency. Some of the keymicroorganisms that produce chron-

    ic inflammation in humans are:

     ) 

    R e f r e s h Y o u r H o m o t o x i c o l o g y

    16

    Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

    Theories of Immunosenescenceand Infection

    Cytomegalovirus, Inflammation, and Homotoxicology 

      By Jhann Arturo, MD, MRes, MSc, PhD 

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    17/28

     ) 

    R e f r e s h Y o u r H o m o t o x i c o l o g y

    • viruses: cytomegalovirus (CMV),

    hepatitis B virus,7 hepatitis C vi-

    rus, virus G, herpes virus type 6,

    -7, -8;

    • bacteria: Chlamydia, Toxoplasma,Helicobacter pylori, Mycobacteria,

     Mycoplasma, Listeria, Brucella, and

    Borrelia .8

    Several recent studies have shown

    that populations of elderly patients

    have excess TCD8+ (cytotoxic)

    lymphocytes in their peripheral

    blood, compared to a healthy young

    or adult population, and these cell

    groups are linked by serologicalmarkers positive for CMV.9  Al-

    though the risk of infection is high-

    er than 70% according to study

    groups, this lentivirus has been

    shown to be capable of producing

    asymptomatic, persistent viral repli-

    cations, causing chronic, undiag-

    nosed, and untreated infections.10 It

    is not known whether the loss of

    TCD3+/CD4+ lymphocytes in old

    age is caused directly by CMV (as

    has been seen in other diseases) or

    whether it is simply an opportunis-

    tic pathogen, but it is known that

    the reduction in the CD4/CD8 ra-

    tio, with increased cytotoxic TCD8+

    expansion and being seropositive

    for CMV increases mortality in the

    first 4 years in more than 90%.11 

    The formulation of anti-CMV anti-

    viral protocols should therefore beconsidered in patients with a sus-

    pected viral infection, and immuno-

    stimulant products specific to the

    cytotoxic functions of T cells should

    be considered in patients with a

    CD4/CD8 ratio below 1.2 (normal

    value 1.5 ± 0.3). CMV is thus di-

    rectly concerned and is one of the

    main agents involved in immune de-

    terioration, and from this point of

    view immunosenescence, with theloss of T cells, could be highly in-

    fectious in nature.9

    Supportive therapy in

    immunosenescence

    Given these severe defects of immu-

    nity in the elderly and the impor-

    tant infectious link with CMV, it is

    essential to consider maintenance

    therapies adjusted to the individ-

    ual’s condition, with low toxicity,

    good tolerance, and within reach of

    all. It is in this type of situation that

    homotoxicology has a vital role: in

    immunological regulation, inflam-

    mation regulation, detoxification

    and lymphatic, gastrohepatic, and

    renal drainage of toxins. Combina-

    tion medications exist with proven

    antiviral activity and with the ability

    to increase IFN-γ levels (Engystol),or involved in cellular phagocyte

    recovery (Echinacea compositum),

    which are undoubtedly an indisput-

    able replacement therapy in immu-

    nosenescence. Inflammation-regu-

    lating products (Traumeel) with the

    ability to inhibit proinflammatory

    cytokines (Il-1, IL-8, TNF-a) and

    therefore systemic chronic inflam-

    mation are essential as blockers of

    inflamm-aging. Tables 2 and 3 showseveral antihomotoxic measures use-

    ful in immunosenescence. Accord-

    ing to the course, detoxification and

    drainage cycles may be repeated. If

    treatment starts with immunostimu-

    lation, the patient may experience

    changes counter to the therapeutic

    aims, owing to the high levels of

    inflammatory molecules. The nutri-

    tional status of the elderly patient

    must be improved at the same time

    as antihomotoxic medication is ad-

    ministered. In some cases, antioxi-

    dative supplementation (vitamin C,

    vitamin E, glutathione, N-acetyl-

    cysteine, and S-adenosyl methion-

    ine), which tends to improve pha-

    gocyte migration, phagocytosis,

    production of TNF-a, and produc-

    tion of IL-1 and IL-2 in T lympho-

    cytes, is also necessary.We can conclude from the above

    that the aging process has a major ) 17

    Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

    Immune component Abnormality in immunosenescence

    Hematopoietic stem cells Increase in hematopoietic progenitor cell counts CD34+

    T lymphocytes Increase in circulating cytotoxic TCD8+/CD28+ lymphocytes

    Reduction in the quantity of naïve TCD3+/CD45RA+ cells

    Reduction in TCD3+/CD8+/CD45RO+ memory lymphocytes

    Reduction in CD4/CD8 ratio < 1.2

    B lymphocytes Increase in B lymphocyte polyreactivity

    Reduction in specificity and quantity in antibody production

    NK cells Increase in the expression of receptor activators of

    NKCD16+/CD56+ and NKT CD16+/CD56+CD3

    Macrophages Reduction in lipopolysaccharide recognition and activity

    Reduction in the production of TNF-a

    Phagocyte deficiencies

    Lymph nodes Reduction in the cellular and functional structure of lymph nodes

    Table 1:

    Main defects in immunosenescence

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    18/28

    ) 18

    Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

     ) 

    R e f r e s h Y o u r H o m o t o x i c o l o g y

    inflammatory component, triggered

    by infectious activators (principally

    viral) which give rise to profound

    defects in the immunity of elderly

    individuals which must be corrected

    in a natural and biological man-

    ner.12|

    DET-phase Basic and/or

    symptomatic

    Regulation therapy* Optional

    Impregnation,

    degeneration

    • Ginseng

    compositum 

    D&D • Advanced supportive

    detoxification and

    drainage

    • Arnica-Heel 

    (if the inflammation is

    more severe)

    IM • Traumeel

    OR • Coenzyme compositum

    • Ubichinon compositum

    • Tonsilla compositum

    Notes: Advanced supportive detoxification and drainage consists of Hepar compositum (liver), Solidago

    compositum (kidneys), and Thyreoidea compositum (connective tissue).

    Dosages: Detoxification and drainage: 1 ampoule of each medication 3 times per week. Immuno-

    modulation: Traumeel, 1 tablet 3 times per day for 6 weeks. Organ regulation: Coenzyme compositum,

    Ubichinon compositum, and Tonsilla compositum, 1 ampoule of each 3 times per week.

    Table 2:

    Immunosenescence: therapy scheme for weeks 1-5

    DET-phase Basic and/or

    symptomatic

    Regulation therapy* Optional

    Impregnation,

    degeneration

    • Ginseng

    compositum 

    D&D • Basic detoxication and

    drainage: Detox-Kit

    • Echinacea compositum

    (if there is a suspicion

    of a bacterial infection)IM • Engystol

    OR • Pulsatilla compositum

    • Glyoxal compositum

    Notes: The Detox-Kit consists of Lymphomyosot, Nux vomica-Homaccord, and Berberis-Homaccord.

    Dosages: Detoxification and drainage: 30 drops of each medication in 1.5 l of water, drink over the

    day. Immunomodulation: Engystol, 1 tablet 3 times per day for 5 days, then break for 5, then take for

    5 days (continue in this fashion for 6 weeks). Organ regulation: Pulsatilla compositum, 1 ampoule

    3 times per week for 6 weeks; Glyoxal compositum, 1 ampoule only in the entire 6 weeks.

    Table 3:

    Immunosenescence: therapy schemes for weeks 6-12

    * Antihomotoxic regulation therapy consists of a three-pillar approach:

    – Detoxification & Drainage (D&D)

    – Immunomodulation (IM)

    – Organ regulation (OR)

    References

    1. Capri M, Salvioli S, Sevini F, et al. The ge-

    netics of human longevity.  Ann NY Acad Sci.

    2006;1067:252-263.2. Pawelec G. Immunosenescence comes of age.

    Symposium on Aging Research in Immunol-

    ogy: The Impact of Genomics. EMBO reports. 

    2007;8(3):220-223.

    3. Ginaldi L, De Martinis M, D’Ostilio A, et

    al. The immune system in the elderly: II.

    Specific cellular immunity. Immunol Res.

    1999;20(2):109-115.

    4. Hyland P, Duggan O, Turbitt J, et al. Nona-

    genarians from the Swedish NONA Immune

    Study have increased plasma antioxidant

    capacity and similar levels of DNA damage

    in peripheral blood mononuclear cells com-

    pared to younger control subjects. Exp Geron- 

    tol. 2002,37(2-3):465-473.5. Franceschi C, Bonafè M, Valensin S. In-

    flamm-aging. An evolutionary perspective

    on immunosenescence.  Ann N Y Acad Sci.

    2000;908:244-254.

    6. Barker DJ, Eriksson JG, Forsén T, Osmond

    C. Fetal origins of adult disease: strength of

    effects and biological basis. Int J Epidemiol.

    2002;31(6):1235-1239.

    7. Arturo JA, Avila GI, Tobar CI, Klinger JC.

    Inmunodesviación TH2 asociada a glomeru-

    lonefritis por HBV. Infectio . 2001;5(2):119-

    120.

    8. Nasralla M, Haier J, Nicolson GL. Multiple

    mycoplasmal infections detected in blood of

    patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and/or fibromyalgia syndrome. Eur J Clin Micro- 

    biol Infect Dis. 1999;18(12):859-865.

    9. Pawelec G, Koch S, Franceschi C, Wikby

    A. Human immunosenescence: does it have

    an infectious component?  Ann N Y Acad Sci.

    2006;1067:56-65.

    10. Schvoerer E, Henriot S, Zachary P, et al.

    Monitoring low cytomegalovirus viremia in

    transplanted patients by a real-time PCR on

    plasma. J Med Virol. 2005;76(1):76-81.

    11. Wikby A, Ferguson F, Forsey R, et al. An im-

    mune risk phenotype, cognitive impairment,

    and survival in very late life: impact of al-

    lostatic load in Swedish octogenarian and

    nonagenarian humans.  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(5):556-565.

    12. De la Fuente M. Effects of antioxidants

    on immune system ageing. Eur J Clin Nutr.

    2002;56(suppl3):S5-S8.

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    19/28

     ) 19

    Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

     ) 

     A r o u n d t h e G l o b e 

    Advanced IAH Lecturer’sTrainings East and West

      By Bruno Van Brandt

    IAH Education Manager

    In addition to its much-visited e-learning program for medicaldoctors and licensed health care

    professionals worldwide, the Inter-

    national Academy for Homotoxicol-ogy also organized two international

    medical education seminars (“IAH

    Rollouts”) this year. In the spirit of

    “train the trainer,” these gatherings

    coached speakers on how to lecture

    on the IAH abbreviated course ma-

    terial in their countries. The goal is

    to have more medical students well

    prepared to take the IAH e-exami-

    nation and obtain the IAH certifi-

    cate in the future. Although tens ofthousands of students have already

    visited the IAH e-learning program,

    the IAH sees live presentations of

    this material as an extra boost to its

    success in homotoxicology educa-

    tion.

    IAH Rollout East took place in

    Baden-Baden, Germany from May

    29-31, 2008, where 72 medical

    doctors and university professors

    from 11 different countries in Cen-tral and especially Eastern Europe

    came to be trained in the use of the

    IAH abbreviated course material.

    This initiative was followed by IAH

    Rollout West in Miami, Florida from

     July 10-12, 2008. The medical doc-

    tors from North and South America

    and Canada who studied the IAH

    educational material in depth

    brought the total of rollout partici-

    pants to about 100 MDs. These ad-vanced lecturers will soon be pro-

    moting the homotoxicological

    model in their home countries.

    The rollout training material (i.e.,

    the IAH abbreviated course in ap-

    plied homotoxicology) is available

    online to medical doctors and health

    care professionals worldwide at

    www.iah-online.com. Every student

    who successfully completes the e-

    examination is sent an IAH certifi-

    cate. Since there is no charge either

    for registration or for the certificate,

    there are no costs involved in takingthe course. Instructional materials

    are currently available in English,

    French, Spanish, Russian, and Pol-

    ish, with German and Portuguese to

    follow in the next few months.|

    Dr. Arturo O’Byrne from Colombia

    lecturing on immunomodulation

    at the IAH Rollout West in Miami,

    Florida

    More than 70 medical doctors and

    university professors from Central and

    Eastern Europe participated in the IAH

    Rollout East in Baden-Baden, Germany.

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    20/28

    Recurrent UTIs  will occur at leasttwice in six months or threetimes in one year (usually these are

    reinfections). Interstitial cystitis  (IC) is

    a chronic disease of unknown origin

    that affects the urinary bladder. The

    symptoms of IC overlap with those

    of a wide range of other disorders,

    including UTIs. IC should be sus-

    pected when a patient complains of

    pressure or pain in the pelvis or re-

    ports bladder discomfort. The pain

    or discomfort typically increases as

    the bladder fills and decreases dur-

    ing voiding, is associated with uri-

    nary frequency or a persistent urge

    to void, and appears in the absence

    of infection or other pathology.

    Incidence and prevalence

    Approximately 8 to 10 million peo-ple in the United States develop a

    UTI each year. Women develop the

    condition much more often than

    men; the reasons are not fully

    known, although the much shorter

    female urethra is suspected. The

    condition is rare in boys and young

    men. 20 percent of women in the

    United States will develop a UTI

    during their lifetimes, and 20 per-

    cent of those will experience a re-

    currence.

    Symptoms

    The symptoms of a lower UTI can

    include: pain or burning sensation

    during or at the end of urination

    (dysuria); frequent (pollakisuria) or

    urgent (urgency) urination; need to

    urinate at night (nocturia); a sensa-

    tion of being unable to urinate fully;

    cloudy, bloody or foul-smelling

    urine; and pain in the lower abdo-men. Low-grade fever (37-38°C or

    98.6-101.0°F) may also be present.

    The symptoms of an upper UTI can

    include: any of the symptoms of a

    lower urinary tract infection, a high

    fever (over 38°C or 101.0°F), nau-

    sea or vomiting, shaking or chills,and pain in the lower back or side

    (renal angle pain), usually on one

    side only.

    Causes and risks factors

    Escherichia coli  causes about 80 per-

    cent of UTIs in adults. These bacte-

    ria are normally present in the colon

    and may enter the urethral opening

    from the skin around the anus and

    genitals. Women may be more sus-ceptible to UTIs because the female

    urethral opening is closer to the

    source of the bacteria (anus or vagi-

    na) and the urethra is shorter than in

    men, allowing bacteria easier access

    to the bladder.

    Other bacteria that cause urinary

    tract infections include Staphylococ- 

    cus saprophyticus  (5 to 15 percent of

    cases),  Chlamydia trachomatis, Myco- 

     plasma hominis, Klebsiella  and (more

    rarely) various species of Proteus  and

    Pseudomonas . Chlamydia   and  Myco- 

     plasma   can be transmitted through

    sexual intercourse.

    For unknown reasons, sexual inter-

    course triggers UTIs in some wom-

    en. Diaphragm users develop infec-

    tions more often, and condoms with

    spermicidal foam may cause vaginal

    growth of E. coli , which can thenenter the urethra.

     ) 

    P r a c t i c a l P r o t o c o l s  

    Bioregulatory Treatmentof Urinary Tract Infections

    By Bert Hannosset, MD 

    20

    Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

    A urinary tract infection (UTI) is defined as an infection

    of any part of the urinary system: urethra, bladder,

    ureters, or kidneys. Lower UTIs are infections in the

    lower part of the urinary tract, which includes the bladder

    (cystitis) and urethra (urethritis). Upper UTIs are

    infections of the upper part of the urinary tract, which

    includes the kidneys (pyelonephritis) and the ureters.

    Upper UTIs are potentially more serious than lower

    UTIs because of the possibility of kidney damage.

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    21/28

     ) 21

    Urinary catheterization can also

    cause UTIs by introducing bacteria

    into the urinary tract. The risk of

    developing a UTI increases when

    long-term catheterization is re-quired.

    In infants, bacteria from soiled dia-

    pers can enter the urethra and cause

    UTIs. E. coli may also enter the ure-

    thral opening when young girls do

    not wipe from front to back after a

    bowel movement.

    Other risk factors include: bladder

    outlet obstructions (e.g., bladder

    stones, benign prostatic hypertro-

    phy), conditions that cause incom-plete bladder emptying (e.g., spinal

    cord injury), congenital abnormali-

    ties of the urinary tract (e.g., vesical

    ureteral reflux), changes in the im-

    mune system (e.g., HIV and diabe-

    tes), and being uncircumcised.

    The causes of IC remain unknown

    and the underlying pathology has

    not yet been fully elucidated. Recent

    studies, however, have shown a pos-

    sible relationship to production of

    autoantibodies to the muscarinic

    M3 receptor, located in the detrusor

    muscle cells of the bladder (which

    mediates cholinergic contraction of

    the urinary bladder).

    Diagnosis

    Differential diagnosis is made by

    laboratory analysis of a sample of

    mid-stream urine (the most reliablesample is obtained via suprapubic

    puncture), followed by a urine cul-

    Journal of Biomedical Therapy 2008  ) Vol. 2, No. 3

     ) 

    P r a c t i c a l P r o t o c o l s  

    ture, if needed, to determine the

    specific bacteria and obtain an anti-

    biogram. When leucocytes are ele-

    vated and the urine culture is nega-

    tive, chlamydial urethritis, prostatitis,

    and IC are possibilities. In recurrent

    UTIs, ultrasound exams of the uri-

    nary tract and intravenous urogra-

    phy can be helpful diagnostic tools.

    A diagnosis of IC can be confirmed

    through cystoscopy with hydrodis-tention.

    Treatment

    In allopathic medicine, lower UTIs

    are most commonly treated with

    antibiotics (e.g., trimethoprim-sulfa-

    methoxazole and amoxicillin), but

    bioregulatory therapy alone is also

    effective in treating this type of in-

    fection. According to homotoxico-

    logical guidelines, one or more basic

    symptomatic products should be

    added to the “three pillar approach”of drainage and detoxification

    (D&D), immunomodulation (IM),

    DET-phase Basic and/or

    symptomatic

    Regulation therapy* Optional

    Endodermal,

    urogenital

    Inflammation

    • Berberis- 

    Homaccord

    • Spascupreel

    D&D • Basic detoxication and

    drainage

    • Echinacea compositum

    (for severe infection)

    IM • Cantharis compositum 

    OR • Solidago compositum

    Notes: In recurrent UTIs, Mucosa compositum and Solidago compositum are used (also as injection

    therapy; see Figure 1) for three months to strengthen the urinary tract.

    Table 1: Treatment for lower UTIs

    DET-phase Basic and/or

    symptomatic

    Regulation therapy* Optional

    Mesodermal,

    nephrodermal

    Inflammation

    • Berberis- 

    Homaccord

    • Spascupreel

    D&D • Advanced supportive

    detoxification and

    drainage

    • Reneel

    • Belladonna-Homaccord

    (for high fever)

    • Mercurius-Heel (if there is

    frank pus in the urine)

    IM • Echinacea compositum

    • Cantharis compositum

    OR • Mucosa compositum

    Notes: Mucosa compositum contains a Colibaccilinum nosode. Solidago compositum contains Equisetum,

    which strengthens the entire renal tract. Because upper UTIs affect a mesenchymal structure, treatment is

    deeper and includes more medications.

    Table 2: Treatment for upper UTIs

    * Antihomotoxic regulation therapy consists of a three-pillar approach:

    – Detoxification & Drainage (D&D)

    – Immunomodulation (IM)

    – Organ regulation (OR)

  • 8/17/2019 Journal of Biomedical Therapy Infectious Diseases

    22/28

    and, if ne