jurnal pembangunan sosial 9 (jun) 2006:...

16
Socialization and Parenting in Chinese Cultural Context JO-PEI TAN ANN BUCHANAN ZAHYAH HANAFI ABSTRACT This paper describes the parenting characteristics and behaviour among Chinese families. Specifically it explores some alternative parenting concepts which may be culturally more accurate in describing the non-western parenting behaviour among Chinese parents and children. It outlines key research literature on Chinese parenting in relations to 1) parenting goals and beliefs among Chinese parents and, 2) the notion of Guan and ‘training’ as a parenting dimension in Chinese families. This paper concludes that a further exploration on non-western parenting is warranted for future family research and thus its findings are deemed to be resourceful for multicultural societies. ABSTRAK Artikel ini menghuraikan karakter dan tingkahlaku keibubapaan keluarga Cina. Secara khususnya artikel ini meneroka beberapa konsep keibubapaan dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa dan kanak-kanak Cina. Artikel ini mengemukakan penyelidikan literatur tentang keibubapaan Cina dari segi hubungan 1) matlamat dan kepercayaan keibubapaan di kalangan ibubapa Cina, dan 2) fahaman Guan dan latihan sebagai dimensi keibubapaan di dalam keluarga Cina. Artikel ini merumuskan penerokaan selanjutnya mengenai keibubapaan bukan kebaratan perlu dijalankan dalam penyelidikan keluarga pada masa depan dan dari itu penemuannya adalah dianggap boleh dijadikan sumber kepada masyarakat pelbagai budaya. INTRODUCTION Parenting is often acquired through a social and cultural belief system (Lerner, Castellino, Terry, Villarruel, & Mckinney, 2002), which means that how parents treat or socialize their children is deliberately learned and shaped by their cultural context. In essence, parenting practice is linked to the values, beliefs, motives and skills which are deemed as culturally appropriate and acceptable within the society and, the larger ecological context. Therefore, it is imperative for Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180

Upload: others

Post on 04-Feb-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

Socialization and Parenting in Chinese Cultural Context

JO-PEITANANNBUCHANANZAHYAHHANAFI

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the parenting characteristics and behaviour among Chinese families. Specifically it explores some alternative parenting concepts which may be culturally more accurate in describing the non-western parenting behaviour among Chinese parents and children. It outlines key research literature on Chinese parenting in relations to 1) parenting goals and beliefs among Chinese parents and, 2) the notion of Guan and ‘training’ as a parenting dimension in Chinese families. This paper concludes that a further exploration on non-western parenting is warranted for future family research and thus its findings are deemed to be resourceful for multicultural societies.

ABSTRAK

Artikel inimenghuraikan karakter dan tingkahlaku keibubapaan keluargaCina.Secarakhususnyaartikel inimenerokabeberapakonsepkeibubapaandalammenggambarkantingkahlakubukankebaratandikalanganibubapadankanak-kanakCina.ArtikelinimengemukakanpenyelidikanliteraturtentangkeibubapaanCinadarisegihubungan1)matlamatdankepercayaankeibubapaandikalanganibubapaCina,dan2)fahamanGuandanlatihansebagaidimensikeibubapaan di dalamkeluargaCina.Artikel inimerumuskan penerokaanselanjutnyamengenaikeibubapaanbukankebaratanperludijalankandalampenyelidikankeluarga pada masa depandandari itu penemuannya adalahdianggapbolehdijadikansumberkepadamasyarakatpelbagaibudaya.

INTRODUCTION

Parentingisoftenacquiredthroughasocialandculturalbeliefsystem(Lerner,Castellino,Terry,Villarruel,&Mckinney,2002),whichmeansthathowparentstreatorsocializetheirchildrenisdeliberatelylearnedandshapedbytheirculturalcontext.Inessence,parentingpracticeislinkedtothevalues,beliefs,motivesandskillswhicharedeemedasculturallyappropriateandacceptablewithinthesocietyand,thelargerecologicalcontext.Therefore,itisimperativefor

Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180

Page 2: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

166 Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9

Distinctive culture heritage is oftenmanifested through parental ideasconcerningtheneedsofchildren,socializationgoals,relationshipswithinthefamilyand theobligationsofparents (Goodnow&Collins,1990). In fact,these distinctions aremore apparent in parent’s behaviour and approachesinchild-rearingsuchasparentalemphasis,thepurposeandmethodofchildsocialization. ComparativestudiesonChineseandWesternparentinghaverevealeddistinctivedifferencesintheirparentingbehaviour(Chao,1994,2001;Stewartetal.,1998).Forexample,Chao(1994;1995;2000;2001)whohasconductedaseriesofstudiesusingChinese-AmericanandWhite-AmericansamplesfoundthattheparentsofChineseandWhite-Americanbackgroundexhibiteddifferentparentingbehaviour.Generally,theChineseparentsfocuson a relationship-oriented parenting approach; they emphasize harmoniousrelationshipswith other individuals, and the child is trained to recognize aparent’swishesasaformofobligation.Ontheotherhand,White-Americanparentshaveamoredevelopmental-orientedparentingapproach,whichplaceemphasisonthechild’spsychologicaldevelopment(Chao,1994;Greenfield,1994). White-Americanparentswhencompared toAsianparents stressoncreatinganenvironmentwhichenrichesthechild’slearning,explorationandcreativityratherthanexertingcontroloverthechild’senvironment.Inaddition,White-Americanparentsvalueindividualismandthusaimtopromotethechild’sconfidence,assertivenessandself-actualization.ThisfurtherdistinguishesthemfromChineseparentswhobelieveinharmoniousinterrelatednessbetweenthechildandotherindividuals,especiallythosewhoarefamilymembers.

Looking at the socialization goals among parents, LeVine (1988) hasidentifiedalistof‘universalparentalgoalsvis-a-vischildren’’whichmotivatesandguides theparent’sbehaviour towards the childdevelopmentoutcome.Previousstudieshavefoundthateventhough,theChineseandWhite-Americanparents share similar universal parentinggoals, they tend to havedifferentmethodsofattainmentandservedifferentpurposeinparent-childrelationship(Chao,1995).Forinstance,bothparentsstressthatthechild’semotionalneeds(i.e.provisionoflove)isthemostprominentgoalinsocialization.However,theChineseparentsbelievethatlovingthechildrequireshighinvestment,sacrificeanddevotiontothechild.Thisincludeshighinvolvementinthechild’slife,theprovisionofgoodeducationandconstantmonitoringofthechild’sbehaviour.White-Americanparents,however,believeintheimportanceofprovidingthechildwith love,consistencyandsecureenvironmentfor theirdevelopment.BasedonChao’s study (1995), for theWhite-Americanparents, loving thechild isdemonstrated indifferentwaysuchasmaking thechild feel loved,beingthereforhim/herandlettingthechildknowsthathe/sheis importantin parent’s lives.’ In addition, theWhite-Americanmothers emphasizedonprovidingconsistencyinthechild’slifeintermofparentalcare,disciplineand

Page 3: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

Socialization and parenting 167

researcherstoseriouslytakeintoconsiderationtheculturalcontextofspecificparentingbehaviours.Withthegrowingculturaldiversityinworldpopulation,anunderstandingofdifferentculturalnormshasthereforebecameincreasinglyimportant.

EvidencefromtheFourthNationalSurveyofEthnicMinoritiesinBritainhasshowedthatethnicminoritygroupshavedifferentnorms,practicesandvalueswhichguide their family lifewhen compared to themajorityWhiteBritishpopulation(Modood,Beishon,&Virdee,1994).Specifically,therearedifferencesinvariousfamilyaspectssuchastheformsofrelationships,familynetworking,parenthood/motherhoodandhomemaking.Inaddition,itisnotablethattherearedistinctdifferencesinrelationstopeople’sattitudes,’thewayoflifeandthewayofbehaviourinthefamilyofthosewithAsianbackgrounds.ThismayimplythatalthoughmanyBritishbornAsianshaveacculturatedtothedominantWesternculture,asLeVine(1988)notes,traditionalvaluesandpracticeinfamilysocializationoftenpersistwithinafamily.Furthermore,parentsinChinesefamiliesoftenattempttopreservetraditionalandstrongvalueswithinthefamily(Wu,1996).Thus,itisimportanttoidentifythedistinctiveculturalandfamilyvaluesamongChinesefamiliesandalsotoexaminethecontrastingconceptswhich tend tobe indigenous forChinese family socialization andparenting,whichmaybedifferentfromtheWesternsociety.Furthermore,thisnotionisstronglysupportedbypreviousstudieswhichexaminetheparentinginaspecificculturalcontextandacknowledgetheimportanceofrecognizingtheculturalmeaningofcertainparentingdimension(Chao,1994;Stewart&Bond,2002a;Super&Harkness,1986).

Ingeneral,theliteratureonfamilyresearchhasconcentratedonWesterncultural practices.Family socialization and child development amongnon-Western families, specifically theChinese, are relatively less explored.However,familyscholarsstudyingChinesefamilysocializationhasshowedthatChinesefamilieshaveseveralcharacteristicsthatdistinguishedthemfromWesternculture(Chao,1994;Chao&Tzeng,2002;Gorman,1998;Ho,1989).Thus,thequestionis“WhatarethevaluesandgoalswhichguideparentingamongChineseparents and towhat extent are theydifferent from those inthemainstream literature?”This paper highlights some available literatureonChinesefamilysocialization.Specifically,theobjectivesofthepaperaretoexplore:1)ParentalbeliefsandgoalsintheparentingofChineseparentsand2) theNotionof ‘Guan’’and ‘Training’asaparentingdimension. ThepaperbeginswithadiscussionofparentalgoalsandbeliefsamongChineseparents.Inthefollowingpart,thepaperpresentsanexplanationofthenotionof‘Guan’andfollowsbyadiscussionoftheconceptof‘training’asaspecificdimension’ofparentingamongChinesefamilies.Finally,thepaperconcludesbysummarizingtheissuesrelatedtoChineseparentingandsuggestingareasforfutureresearchdirection.

PARENTAL GOALS AND BELIEFS AMONG CHINESE FAMILIES

Page 4: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

168 Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9

Inparticular,Wuandcolleagues(2002)haveconductedacomparativestudyto examine theChinese culturally-derived parenting constructs (modesty,directiveness,protection,shaming/lovewithdrawal,maternalinvolvement)inconjunctiontotheWesternliterature-derivedparentingstylistics(authoritativeandauthoritative).Ithasbeenconcludedthateventhoughalltheseconceptsare applicable for parents in bothChinese andWhite samples nonetheless,significantculturaldifferencesexistedbetween the twoculturalgroups. Inaddition,therearecertainparentingbehaviourwhichreceivesmoreemphasisbecause of differing cultural norms and the goals towardwhich childrenaresocialized. For instance,Chineseparentswere found to focusmoreonmodestyandcooperationamongyoungchildren,exhibitmoredirectivenessandprotectiveparentingbehaviourcomparedtoWhiteparents.Thesefindingsarecoherentwithseveralotherstudieswhichconcludedthatparentalbehaviourtowardsthechilddoesnotnecessarily‘mean’thesamethingacrossdifferentcultural groups’(Chao,1994;Chiu, 1987;Gorman,1998; Jose et al., 2000;Supple,Peterson,&Bush,2004).Forexample,Joseandcolleagues(2000)revealthateventhoughChineseparentsaremorecontrollingovertheirchildren,they are also equally aswarm to their childrenwhen compared toWhite-Americanparents.TheliteraturealsoshowsthatAsianparentshavedifferentconnotationsforparentalcontroloverchild’sbehaviour(Chao,1994;Fowler,2002;Gorman,1998;Suppleetal.,2004;Wu,1996).RohnerandPettengill(1985),forexample,foundthatAsianadolescentswhoexperiencedhigherlevelofparentalcontrolalsoperceivedhigherlevelofparentalacceptanceandlowerlevelofparentalnegligence.Thus,asarguedbyWu(1996),theparentalcontrolamongChinesefamilieshasverypositiveconnotationforachild’sbehaviourand isnotmerelyapunitiveanddomineering featureasoftendescribed in‘authoritarian’parenting.

In general, comparative studies onparentingbehaviour amongChineseandWesternparentsdemonstratesignificantdifferencesonparentalemphasis,purposesandmethodofparenting.IthasbeenshownthatChineseparentsaremotivatedtowardsrelationalgoalswhichfocusonaharmoniousrelationshipwith other individuals (i.e. especially parents)whileWestern parents aremotivatedtowardsindividualgoalswhichemphasizeself-development(Chao,1995;Chao&Tzeng,2002,Bornsteinetal.,1990).Asforparentingapproach,Chineseparentsaremore‘directive’towardsachild’sbehaviour,whileWesternparentsaremore‘facilitative’wheniscomestoparenting(Chao,1996a).Inaddition,ChineseandWesternparentstendtohavedifferentideasforparentalbehaviour,especiallywithregardstoparentalcontrolandwarmth. Thus, itcanbeconcludedthatChineseandWesternparentingareshapedbydifferentculturalemphases;thishasconsiderablyinfluencedtheunderlyingmotivationsofchildsocializationandparenting.

NOTION OF ‘GUAN’ IN CHINESE FAMILIES

Page 5: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

Socialization and parenting 169

expectationsonchildbehaviour.

Followingfromthat,theparentalbehaviourofChineseandWhite-Americanparents tends to support different purposes; theChinese parents aimed atfosteringacloseparent-childrelationship,whiletheultimatepurposeofWhite-Americanparentsisbuildingthechild’sself-esteem.Asforskill-buildingforthechild’ssuccess,theChineseparentfeelsthatgoodeducationistheessentialkeytosuccessandofteneducationachievementisthemeasurementofsuccess.However,theWhite-Americanparentsbelieveintheimportanceofself-esteemasthe‘foundation’toachild’ssuccessandplacemoreemphasisonsocialskillsmorethanonacademicperformance(Chao,1994,1996a).

Theparental role is another important determining aspect of parenting;howaparentperceivedits roleandresponsibility inchilddevelopmenthasconsiderableinfluenceonhowtheparenttreattheirchild.Chao(1994;1995)indicatesthatChineseandWhite-Americanparentshavedistinctperspectivesregardingtheirroleasparents.Ingeneral,Asianparentsassumetheroleof‘protector’and’‘caretaker’whoareresponsibleforthechild’sneeds,ensuringasafeenvironmentandfosteringchild’sdependencyonadultsfortheirneeds(Gorman,1998).ThisbehaviourreflectstheChineseculturalbeliefsthatyoungchildrenare‘incapableofunderstandingandmakingdecisionthatareintheirbestinterest’’(Ho&Kang,1984).Thus,parentsareobligedtoprovidedirectionandguidanceforthechild’sconduct.

Inaddition,’previousstudiesalsorevealthatChineseparentstendtopracticeamore ‘directive’ approach in’parenting (Chao, 1995; Jose,Huntsinger,&Liaw,2000),especiallywithregardstotheregulationofchild’sbehaviourandacademicperformance’(Wuetal.,2002).ThisdirectiveapproachreflectsthevalueplacedbyChineseparentsonobedience,andtheytendtoparentwithacodeofconductforregulatingachild’sbehaviourandaremoredirectiveinparent-childinteraction.AsfortheparentalroleamongWesternfamilies,Westernparentstendtoassumethe‘facilitative’roleinparenting,whichincludesproviding a stimulating environment and, helping the child to experiencetheirfeelingsandarticulatetheirneedstoothers(Chao,1994).TheWesternparentsalsotendtoviewthechildasanindividual,thustheypromoteachild’sindependenceandseparatenessfromtheparents,bothinactionandthoughts.Inparticular,theWesternparentingbehaviouraimtopromotemorechildautonomyandtohelpthechildtopursuetheirownideasbyprovidinganenvironmentconduciveforchilddevelopmentandconfidencebuilding(Chao,1994,2000).

The investigation of culturemeaning for parenting acrossChinese andWesternfamiliesisalsoextendedinseveralotherstudieswhichhavesupportedthenotionthatChineseandWesternfamilieshavedistinctiveculturalnormsandemphasesinparentingtheirchildren(Lin&Fu,1990;Wuetal.,2002).

Page 6: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

170 Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9

amanifestationofprotectivenessandphysicalcaring(Ho,1986).Inaddition,parents’continuousmonitoringandguidancealsoservestorestrictexposuretoundesirablebehaviourandpreventpotentialmisbehaviourfrombecomingserious(Chao,2000;Tobinetal.,1987).InJoseandcolleagues’’(2000)study,theparentingapproachamongAsianparentsisperceivedasanintegrationoffirm-controlandhighlevelsofparentalwarmth.Inaddition,theoverlappingnatureofparentalcontrolandwarmthamongtheAsiansampleisalsosupportedbyfindingsinnumerousstudies(Joseetal.,2000;Rohner&Kim,2002;Rohner&Pettengill,1985;Stewartetal.,1999;1998).Inaddition,researchhasshowedthatChineseparentstendtochanneltheircareandconcernthroughdifferentparenting dimensions (i.e. parental control andmonitoring) (Chao, 1994;Nomura,Noguichi,Saito,&Tezuka,1995;Stewartetal.,1998)ratherthanopenlyexpressingtheiraffection(i.e.praising,hugging,kissingandphysicaldemonstrativeness)(Gray&Steinberg,1999;Lin&Fu,1990).Inadditiontothat,parentalcontrolamongChineseparentshasafunctionalaspect;itisaimedfortheorder-maintenanceandcoordinationofchildreninfamily,ratherthanatrestrictivecontrolorinterferingwiththechildren’sbehaviour(Lau&Cheung,1987).Forexample,eventhoughthe‘training’dimensionencompassesasetofconducts,themotivationbehindthisconceptisnottodominatethechildbutrathertoassure‘familialgoalsofharmoniousrelationshipswithothersandtheintegrityof thefamilyunit’’(Chao,1995;Lau&Cheung,1987). Thus,thetrainingimpliesafunctionalaspectofparentalcontrolandcontributestohealthyfamilyinteractions(Cheung&Lau,1985;Forman&Forman,1981).

Followingfromtheelucidationofthenotionof‘Guan’,researchonChinese

familyhas utilized ‘training’ as an alternativedimension to assessChineseparenting (Chao,1994;Wu,1996). This ‘training’dimension inparenting,as suggestedbyStewart and colleagues (2002a; 2002b),may represent theauthoritativeparenting in aChinese context.These arguments are not onlysupportedbythedistinctivecharacteristicsofparentaltraining(Chao,1994;1996a;2000;Lau&Cheung,1987)butalsobyempiricalfindings(Chao,1994;Lau&Cheung,1987;Stewartetal.,1999;1998).Inreviewingthedifferencesbetweentheconceptof‘training’andtheBaumrind’stypologyofparenting,Chao(2000)hasnotedthedistinctconceptualizationsofthetwomainconstructs,namelythe‘control’and’‘warmth’,whichcharacterized’‘training’,authoritativeandauthoritarianparenting.AsassertedbyChao(1994),parentalcontrolinthe‘training’dimensioninvolvesparent’sclosemonitoringandprovisionofguidancewhichisintendedtopreventanyundesirablebehaviourofthechildfromworsening.However,Baumrind’s(1971)definitionofparentalcontrolinvolves restrictiveness or domination of the childwhich aims for child’scompliance.’Asforthewarmthdimension,theprevioussectionhasshownthatthedemonstrationoflove/concerninChinesecultureismoresubtleandlacksexpressivenesscomparedtoWesternculture;andmoreimportantlytheaffection

Page 7: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

Socialization and parenting 171

Numerous studies have supported the culturally based argument that theparentingconceptsfoundintheWesternliteraturemaynotaccuratelyreflecttheunderlyingparentingideologiesofChineseparents(Chao&Tzeng,2002;Chen,Liu,&Li,2000;Rohner&Kim,2002;1999;Stewartetal.,1998;Trommsdorff&Iwawaki,1989).Thus,thishighlightsthequestionontheuniversalityoftheexistingparentingconceptsforotherethnicgroups.Inresponsetothis,Chao(1994)proposesthenotionofGuanfordescribingAsianparentinginitsculturalspecificity.ThenotionofGuancanbetranslatedliterallyas‘training’andinChineseitalsomeans‘tocarefor’,‘togovern’and’‘toinvolve’.Itisnotablethatguan/trainingisoftenusedsynonymouslywithchild-rearingamongChinesefamilies.Forexample,thenotionofGuaninChinesesocio-culturalcontextcontainstheideaofeducatingthechildinanexpectedmodeofbehaviour(Ho&Kang,1984)assoonasthechildbeginstounderstand(Wu,1996).Itisnotedthatparentsarethefirstteachersofthechildand,thustheyhavetheprimaryresponsibilitytotraintheyoungchild(Beishon,Modood,&Virdee,1998;Luo,1987).Furthermore,thecontrolandgovernanceofthechild’sbehaviourareregardedasbeingtheobligationof‘good’and’‘responsible’parents’(Ho,1986;Tobin,Wu,&Davidson,1987).

It is found that the ‘training’ ofChinese children tends to start at early

agethroughparentalguidance(Ho,1986;Wu,1996).IntheChineseculturalcontext,itisbelievedthata‘youngchildislikeawhitepieceofpaper’andhe/sheisdeemedtobenaturallygood(Chao&Tzeng,2002).Thus,itistheparent’sroletostartthechildoffinthe’‘correct’directionandtofosterthechild’sdevelopmentwhenthechildisstillyoung(Chen,1996).Itisassumedthatwhenachildistrainedtorecognizetheadult’scommandsandtodifferentiatebetweenacceptableandunacceptablebehaviouratayoungage,thencorporalpunishmentwillnotbenecessarywhenthechildgrowsolder(Ho,1996).Inadditiontoparentalguidance,childtrainingpracticesmayincludeexposingthechildtoexplicitexamplesofproperbehaviour,whereyoungchildrenareexpectedtoparticipateinthefamily,socialandceremonialfunctionsinordertobeexposedandlearntheculturallyacceptablebehaviour(Hsu,1981).

Inaddition,‘training’parentingbehaviouralsoincorporatescloseparentalinvolvement and continuousmonitoring of the child’s behaviour (Chao,1994).Thisisadistinguishingfeatureoftraining/GuanfordescribingChineseparenting,which incorporates the immense involvement of parental careand concern for children, in addition to parental control and directiveness(Chao,1994;Joseetal.,2000;Stewartetal.,1998).Forexample,Gorman(1998) found thatChinese parents placed emphasis on constant guidanceandgovernanceofchild’sconductwhichweregroundedingenuinecareandconcernfortheirchildren’sfuture.Inaddition,Chinesemotherstendtokeepthechildphysicallycloseandtoconstantlyobservethechild’swhereaboutsas

Page 8: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

172 Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9

In addition, a series of studies has examined the contrasting effects ofparental ‘training’ in different cultural group (mostly betweenChinese andWhite-Americans)inordertotestitsvalidityandcoherenceinWesternculture(Chao,1994,1995;Stewartetal.,2000;Stewartetal.,2002b).FindingsonChinese andWhite-American samples show significant differences in theirperceptionofparental‘training’whichinturnrelatetodifferenteffectsonchilddevelopment.Specifically, Chao(1994)hasfoundthat evenafteraccountingfor parental control, authoritative parenting and educational level,Chineseparentsstillhaveasignificantlyhigherscoreonparental‘training’measurewhencomparedtoWhite-Americanparents.Asaresultofculturalvariation,boththeChineseandWhite-Americanparentsmayhavedifferentdefinitionsfortheconceptof‘training’.White-Americanparentstendtorelatetrainingwithamoreregimentedconnotation,whileChineseparentsrelate’‘training’withtheideaof‘love,caringandgoverning’(Chao,1994).Inaddition,otherstudiesrevealthatparental‘training’issignificantlycorrelatedwithadolescent’sadjustmentforChinesesamplebutweaklycorrelatedinWesternsample(Stewartetal.,2002b;Stewartetal.,1998).Thismaybeexplainedbythefactthat‘parentaltraining’’evolves from a socio-cultural tradition that is shaped byChinesechild-rearingideologieswhichmaynotnecessarilybesharedbyparentsfromaWesternculturalbackground.Thisfurthersupportsthenotionthat‘training’as the alternative parenting dimension is deemed to be culturally sensitiveandaimedatmeasuringthedistinctivenessinChineseparentingideologies.Therefore,theliteratureindicatesthatthe‘training’parentingdimensionoffersan‘indigenous’conceptwhichismoresuitableforassessingparentingamongChineseparents.

Insummary,thesefindingsimplythatparentinginChineseculturalcontexttendstobequalitativelydifferentfromthosedescribedinWesternculture;itsculturally-specificfeaturesappeartobemorerelevanttothenotionofGuan.Generally,Chineseparentswhohavedistinctivesocial,culturalandhistoricalperspectivesexpressdifferentconceptionoffamilysocialization,especiallyinrelationtothepurposeandmethodofparenting.Thus,itappearsthatthenotionofGuanreflectstheChineseparentingprincipleswhereconstantsupervisionofthechild,directivenessandorderformaintainingcontrolinthefamilyisequatedtoparentalcareandconcernforthechild(Chao,1994;Wuetal.,2002).In otherwords, themore indigenous notion ofGuan has provided amoreaccuratedescriptionofChineseparentingandprovidesplausibleelaborationon the relationshipsbetweenparentingbehaviourandchilddevelopment inChinesefamilies.

CONCLUSION

Basedontheavailableliterature,itcanbeconcludedthatencouragingprogress

Page 9: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

Socialization and parenting 173

ofChineseparentsisdemonstratedthroughmeanswhicharedifferenttothosecharacterizedinWesternliterature(Chao,1994;Ho,1986;1996;Wu&Tseng,1985).Forexample,inthe‘training’dimension,parentalwarmthisreflectedinitemsmorerelevanttoChineseparentingpracticesuchasinvolvementinchild’seducation,constantmonitoringofchild’sbehaviourandemphasisonhardworkandself-discipline(Chao,1994;Chao&Sue,1996a).Whileintheclassificationofauthoritativeandauthoritarianparenting,Baumrind(1967)andRohner(1985)definedparentalwarmthbasedontheemotionalandphysicaldemonstrativenessofaffection.Itisassumedthatparentswhodisplayalackofwarmthtendtoexpresshostilityandaggressionand,neglecttheneedsofthechild. In thissense,Chao(1994)argues thatdemonstrationofaffectionusingemotionalandphysicalexpressivenessasdescribedinWesternliteraturemaynotcapturethefeaturesofparentalwarmthamongChineseparents.Thisimpliesthattherearequalitativedistinctionsbetweenhowparentalcontrolandwarmtharedefinedintheseparentingconcepts.Thus,thedistinctiveculturalmeaningsforparentalcontrolandwarmthhaveshedlightsontheexistentofdifferingculturalnormsandemphasesonparentingandchilddevelopmentforChineseandWesternparents.

Asfortheimplicationonchilddevelopment,ithasbeensuggestedthatthe

conceptof‘training’ismorerelevantnotonlytotheunderstandingofparentingbut also child adjustments amongChinese families (Stewart et al., 2002b).In addition, studies also show thatChinese children perceive their parents’controlasbeingverypositiveandnecessary,whichleadtopositivechildrens’psychologicaladjustment(Lau&Cheung,1987;Ong,2000;Trommsdorff&Iwawaki,1989).Forinstance,Trommdroff(1989)notedthatAsianadolescentsmayfeel‘rejected’bytheirparents if theyexperiencea lackofcontrolandgreaterautonomyfromtheirparents.’Inparticular,previous’studiesrevealthattheconceptof‘training’ispredictiveofpositivepsychologicaldevelopmentamongAsianchildren(Stewart,Bond,Abdullah,&Ma,2000;Stewartetal.,1999;1998).Forinstance,Stewartandcolleagues(1998)foundthatChineseadolescentswhoexperiencedahigherlevelofparental‘training’tendtobewell-adjustedinseveralaspectsofpsychosocialdevelopmentsuchasperceivedhealthandlifesatisfaction.Thesepositiveimplicationsonchilddevelopmentmaybeexplainedbythepositiverelationshipbetweentheconceptof‘training’andparentalwarmth’(Chao,2000;Stewart&Bond,2002a;2002b;1999;1998).Previousstudyhasdocumentedthatthe‘training’characteristicsinparentingaresignificantlyrelatedtoparentalwarmthforbothChinesefathersandmothersbutthat,nosignificantrelationshipwasfoundbetweentheconceptof‘training’and’‘restrictivecontrol’’(Stewartetal.,1998).Inotherwords,the‘training’dimensionofparentingisperceivedpositivelybyChineseparentsandtheirchildren;ittendstoreflectthewarmthandaffectionaparenthastowardsthechildrenwithinaChinesecontext.

Page 10: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

174 Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9

In summary, this literature reviewonChinese family socialization andparentinghassomeimplicationsonthecurrentresearchmilieu.Theparentingconstructs emphasized and derived fromWestern culturemay not haveaccuratelycharacterizeChineseparenting,becauseparentingandsocializationdonottakeplaceinaculturalvacuumbutratheritiscontextuallycircumscribed.In addition, researchwhich imposedWesterns constructs and frameworksintonon-westernsamplemaybetheat-riskofmissingthekeyrelationshipsinnon-Westerncultures (Stewartetal.,2000;Wuetal.,2002). Thus, it isimportanttonotethatparentingbehaviourandchildsocializationisguidedbyculturalcontext,andrecognitionofculturallyvaluedgoalsareimportantwhenexaminingsocializationprocesseswithinspecificcultures.Therefore,utilizingthe constructs, derived fromChinese cultural notions, couldbe empiricallyand contextuallymore relevantwhen analyzingChinese parenting. Giventhissituation,moresignificantdevelopmentonChineseparentingandfamilysocializationresearchcanbeexpectedinthefollowingdecades.

SUGGESTION FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

ByreviewingtheavailablestudiesonChineseparenting,thereviewerattemptstosuggestapossiblecourseforfutureresearchinAsianculturalcontext.TheemergingthemeontheappreciationofChinese/non-Westernparentalbeliefsandgoals,andtheculturallyspecificparentingconceptswarrantfurtherexploration.Futurestudiesshouldtakeintoaccountthespecificculturevalueswhendefiningdifferentaspectsofparentingbehaviour(i.e.parentalinvolvement,parent-childinteraction,parent-childrelationship)andexplorewaysofconceptualizingandmeasuringthesevalueswhichareembeddedinparenting.Wuandcolleagues(2002)notethatbystudyingspecificparentingpracticesandexisting‘stylisticdimension’,culture-specificpatternsmayemerge.Thus,itshouldbeinformativeforfuturestudytoexaminethecomparisonbetweentheconceptof‘training’,authoritative and authoritarian parentingwith different parenting aspectsemphasizedinNon-WesternandWesternculture.Thiswillfurtherelaboratetheunderlyingchildsocializationphilosophiesthatmaydifferentiatewaysthatparentingconstructsareendorsedindiverseculturalsettings(Berry,Poortinga,Segall,&Dasen,2002).

Inaddition,futurestudiesshouldinvestigatefurtherhowthenotionofGuanrelatestospecificchilddevelopmentaloutcomesandbuilduponworksthathasalreadybeenconductedregardingthe‘training’parentingdimension’(Chao,1994;2000;Stewartetal.,2000;1999;1998).InadditiontotheChinesesample,futurestudiesshouldexpandtheendorsementof‘training’parentingdimensiontootherAsiansamplesuchasSouthAsiansandSouthEastAsians.Thiswillenablethegeneralizationof‘training’parentingdimensiontoincludelarger

Page 11: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

Socialization and parenting 175

hasbeenmadeontheresearchofChinesefamilysocializationandparentingpractice.Itisnotablethatscholarsoffamilyresearchareincreasinglyconcernedwith the implicationof cultural contexts and also aremore attentive to theculturallydistinctiveideologies/parentingdimensionswhichdifferfromthosedescribed in theWestern literature. Ingeneral, the literaturehas raised thequestionoftheuniversalityoftheexistingparentingconceptsandhighlightedtheimportanceofculturalimplicationsonchild-rearing.Inthissense,theemergingthemeistheimportanceofconsideringparentingconstructswhichmayhavedifferentrelevancetodifferentcultures.Inparticular,thedifferentemphasisplacedbyChinesefamiliesinresponsetoculturalgoalsandbeliefsimpliesadifferentparentingapproach(i.e.directivevs.facilitative)andpromotesadifferentmethodofparentingwhencomparedtoWesternfamilies.Inaddition,theirdifferentculturalrootsalsoinculcatedifferentconnotationsfortheconceptof‘control’and’‘warmth’inparentingandthustheirconsequencesforchilddevelopmentareunlikelytobesimilarforparentsandchildrenofotherculturalbackgrounds(i.e.White-Americanfamilies).Thus,thisimpliesthatparentingconceptsanditsimplicationsareindeeddependentontheculturaldefinitionandsocialbehaviourvaluedbythespecificcommunity.

ForChinesechild-rearingideology,animportantthemeemergingfromtheliteratureisthenotionofGuan,whichendorseshighparentalcontrolintegratedwithhighlyinvolvedparentalcaring(Chao,1994;Ho&Kang,1984).ThisnotionassumesthatparentalcontrolamongChineseparentsistypically‘equatedwithparentalcaring,concernandinvolvement’’(Chao,1994,1995;Gorman,1998;Stewart et al., 1998). Thus, the notionofGuan has a very positiveconnotationamongChinesefamilies:itservesasamanifestationofacaringparentalroleinChinesechild-rearingideologiesandimpliesafunctionalaspectoforder-maintenanceinthefamily.ItisalsonotedtobequalitativelydifferentfromtheparentingconceptsdescribedinWesternliterature.Inaddition,anewculturally-constructedparentingdimensionhasemerged from the literature,namelythetrainingdimension.ThisalternativedimensionincludesthedifferentemphasisinparentingamongChineseparentssuchasaparent’sprimaryconcernaboutchild’sneeds,emphasisonchild’seducation,earlytraining,self-disciplineand’organization.Theliteratureshowsthattheconceptof‘training’tendstobemorerelevanttoChineseparentingattitudesandmorepredictiveofthechild’sadjustmentamongthoseofChineseculturalbackgroundswhencomparedtothegeneraldimensions(i.e.authoritarianandauthoritative)whicharemorecongruentwithWesternphenomenon.Availableliteraturealsoindicatesthedistinct conceptualization for parental control andwarmth in the ‘training’dimensionanditscontrastingeffectamongWesternculturalgroup.Thus,the‘training’ dimension,whichderives specifically fromChinese child-rearingbeliefs, has been proven to capture the cultural distinctiveness ofChineseparentingandendorsestheparentingattitudeswhicharemoreappreciatedinaChinesecontext.

Page 12: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

176 Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9

REFERENCES

Baumrind,D.1967.ChildCarePracticesAnteceding3PatternsofPreschoolBehaviour.InGenetic Psychology Monograph.75:43-88.

Baumrind,D. 1971.CurrentPatterns ofParentalAuthority.Developmental Psychology, 4 (1):1-103.

Beishon,S.,Modood,T.,&Virdee,S.1998.Ethnic Minority Families.London:PolicyStudiesInstitute.

Berry, J.W.,Poortinga,Y.H., Segall,M.H.,&Dasen,P.R. 2002.Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications(2nded.).Cambridge:UniversityPress.

Chao,R.K.1994.BeyondParentalControlandAuthoritarianParentingStyle:UnderstandingChinese ParentingThrough theCulturalNotion ofTraining.Child Development, 65 (4):1111-1119.

Chao,R.K.1995.ChineseandEuropeanAmericanCulturalModelsof theSelfReflectedinMothers’ChildrearingBeliefs.Ethos, 23 (3):328-354.

Chao,R.K.1996a.ChineseandEuropeanMothers’BeliefAbouttheRoleofParenting inSchoolSuccess.Journal of Cross-Cultural Pscyhology, 27: 403-423.

Chao,R.K.2000.TheParentingofImmigrantChineseandEuropeanAmericanMothers-RelationsBetweenParentingStyles,SocializationGoals,andParentalPractices.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 21 (2):233-248.

Chao,R.K. 2001.ExtendingResearch on theConsequences of ParentingStyle forChineseAmericansandEuropeans.Child Development, 72 (6):1832-1843.

Chao,R.K.,&Sue,S.1996a.ChineseParentalInfluenceandTheirChildren’sSchoolSuccess:AParadoxintheLiteratureonParentingStyle.InS.Lau(Ed.),

Growing Up the Chinese way(pp.93-120).HongKong:ChineseUniversityPress.

Chao,R.K.,&Tzeng,V.2002.ParentingofAsians.InM.H.Bornstein(Ed.),Social Conditions and Applied Parenting(2nded.,Vol.4,pp.59-93).MahWah,NewJersey:LawrenceErlbaumAssociation.

Chen,S.J.1996.PositiveChildishness:ImagesofChildhoodinJapan.InC.H.Hwang&M.E.Lamb(Eds.),Images of Childhood.Mahwah,NewJersey:LawrenceErlbaumAssociation.

Chen,X.,Liu,M.,&Li,D.2000.Parentalwarmth,centralandindulgenceandtheirrelationstoadjustmentinChinesechildren:Alongitudinal.Journal of Family Psychology. 14:401-409.

Cheung,P.C.,&Lau,S.1985.Self-Esteem:ItsRelationshiptotheFamilyandSchoolSocialEnvironmentsAmongChineseAdolescents.Youth and Society, 16 (4):438-456.

Chiu,L.H.1987.Child-RearingAttitudesofChinese,ChineseAmericanand

Page 13: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

Socialization and parenting 177

Asianpopulations.Notably,parentingbehaviourtendtochangeaccordingtothechild’sageordevelopmentalstage.Sincemostofthepreviousresearchsamplewastakenfromyoungadultgroup(Gorman,1998;Stewartetal.,2000;1999;1998),itwillbeusefultoexaminethe‘training’parentingconceptamongchildrenfromdifferentagegroupsandcomparetheresultsacrossthegroups.Asformethodology,futurestudiesshouldutilizeamulti-methodassessmentthatincorporatesbothself-ratedreportandobservationalmethodologies.Parentsmayratetheirownparentingmoreinaccordancewithculturallyinfluencednormsthaninaccordancewiththeiractualbehaviour(Wuetal.,2002). Inaddition,itwillalsobeusefultoincludebothparents(fatherandmothers)andthechildinthesameresearchforcomparingtheirperceptionsonparentingbehaviourandalsotocross-referencethefindings.ResearchalsohasshownthattheparentingbehaviourofAsianfathersandmotherstendtobedifferent(Shek,1998). Thesemulti-methodandmulti-responseassessmentswill behelpfultovalidatethefindings.

ThispaperdrawsfromtheavailableliteratureontheemergingthemesinresearchonfamilysocializationandparentingbehaviourinaChineseculturalcontext.Previousresearchersnotethatculturally-specificparentingconceptsare indeed necessary to explain the nexus between family socializationideologiesandcultureinanon-Westerncontext.Asnotedintheintroduction,thegrowingpopulationofethnicminorities,especiallytheAsianfamiliesinWesterncountrieshasindicatedtheneedfordifferentapproachesandculturallyspecificframeworkswhenexaminingsocialissuesregardingfamiliesofAsianbackground.Thispaperhashighlightedsomeissuesregardingnon-Westernfamilysocializationandparentingwhichmaybeconstructivetowardspromotingreflectiononculturaldiversityinamulticulturalsetting.Thus,thisreviewofliteraturemayhaveusefulimplicationsforculturalawarenessinourincreasingculturallydiversifiedsociety.Inadditiontothat,theauthorsacknowledgethelimitationofthispaper; it isnotedthat thepaperlacksinthediscussionondistinctivequalityofChineseparentinginrelationstotheparentingbehaviourofparentsfromotherpartsofAsiasuchasJapan,Korea,SouthAsiaandSouthEastAsia(i.eMalaysia,VietnamandPhilippines).Inaddition,thepaperdoesnotdiscussanyliteratureonparentingbehaviouramongparentsinChinawheresomeinterestingtransformationsmaybeexpectedasaresultoftheadventoftheonechildpercouplepolicy. Itwillundoubtedlyprovide somevaluableinsightsintotheparentingofChineseparentsinChinaincomparisontothoseinotherpartsoftheworld.Besidesthat,itwillbeusefulnotonlytoreviewthefindingsbutalsodetailedtheemergingmethodologicalissuesinthestudiesinordertoassessandunderstandthelimitationsintermsoftheirinternalorexternalvalidity.DiscussioninclusiveoftheseadditionaltopicswillprovideamorecomprehensiveoverviewoftheresearchonChineseparentinganditsrelevancetoAsianparentinginthebroaderculturalperspective.

Page 14: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

178 Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9

Diverse Societies(Vol.40,pp.3-11).SanFrancisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.Lin,C.-Y.C.,&Fu,V.R.1990.AComparisonofChild-RearingPractices

AmongChinese,ImmigrantChinese,andCaucasian-AmericanParents.Child Developmen., 61 (2)(SpecialIssueonMinorityChildren):429-433.

Luo,G.J.1987.AnalysisoftraditionalmoraleducationofChina.Educational Research, 3:8-11.

Modood,T.,Beishon,S.,&Virdee,S.1994.Changing Ethnic Identities.London:PolicyStudiesInstitute.

Nomura,N.,Noguichi,Y.,Saito,S.,&Tezuka,I.1995.FamilyCharacteristicsandDynamicsinJapanandtheUnitedStates:APreliminaryReportfromtheFamilyEnvironmentScale.International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 19 (1):59-86.

Ong,A. C. 2000.Parenting Behaviour and Adolescents’ Psychosocial Adjustment.PaperpresentedattheAustralianAssociateforResearchinEducation,Sydney,Australia.

Rohner,R.P.&Kim,K.2002.ParentalWarmth,ControlandInvolvementinschooling-PredictingAcademicamongKoreanAmericanAdolescents.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 33 (2):127-140.

Rohner,R.P.&Pettengill,S.M.1985.PerceivedParentalAcceptance-RejectionandParentalControlAmongKoreanAdolescents.Child Development. 56 (2)(FamilyDevelopmentandtheChild):524-528.

Shek,D.T. L. 1998.Adolescents’ Perceptions of Paternal andMaternalParentingStylesinaChineseContext.The Journal of Psychology. 132 (5):527-537.

Stewart,S.M.&Bond,M.H.2002a.ACriticalLookatParentingResearchfromtheMainstream:ProblemsUncoveredWhileAdaptingWesternResearchtoNon-WesternCultures.British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 20 (3):379-392.

Stewart, S.M.,Bond,M.H.,Abdullah,A.S.M.&Ma,S. 2000.Gender,ParentingandAdolescentFunctioninginBangladesh.Merrill Palmer Quarterly. 46:540-564.

Stewart,S.M.,Bond,M.H.,Kennard,B.,Ho,L.M.,&Riffat,M.Z.2002b.DoestheChineseConstructofGuanExporttotheWest?International Journal of Psychology. 37 (2):74-82.

Stewart, S.M.,H,B.M.,Zaman,R.M.,McBride-Chang,C.,Rao,N.,&Fielding,R. 1999.FunctionalParenting inPakistan. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 23:747-770.

Stewart,S.M.,Rao,N.,Bond,M.H.,McBride-Chang,C.,Fielding,R.,&Kennard,B.D. 1998.Chinese dimensions of parenting:BroadeningWesternPredictorsandOutcome.International Journal of Psycholog. 33 (5):345-358.

Super, C. M., & Harkness, S. 1986. The Developmental Niche:A

Page 15: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

Socialization and parenting 179

Anglo-AmericanMothers.International Journal of Social Psychology. 128: 411-413.

Forman,S.G.,&Forman,B.D.1981.FamilyEnvironmentandItsRelationstoAdolescentPersonalityFactors.Journal of Personality Assessment. 46:163-167.

Fowler,F.J.J.2002.Survey Research Methods(3rded.Vol.1).London:Sage.Goodnow,J.J.,&Collins,W.A.1990.Development According to Parents:

The Nature, Sources and Consequences of Parents’ Ideas.Hillsdale:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates.

Gorman,J.C.1998.ParentingAttitudesandPracticesofImmigrantChineseMothersofAdolescents.Family Relations, 47 (1):73-80.

Gray,M.R.,& Steinberg, L. 1999.UnpackingAuthoritative Parenting:ReassessingaMultidimensionalConstruct.Journal of Marriage and the Family. 61 (3):574-587.

Greenfield,P.M.1994.Independenceandinterdependenceasdevelopmentalscripts:Implicationsfortheory,researchandpractice.InP.M.Greenfield&R.R. Cocking (Eds.),Cross-Cultural Roots of Minority Child Development(pp.1-37).NewJersey:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates.

Ho,D.,&Kang,T. 1984. IntergenerationalComparisons ofChild-RearingAttitudesandPracticesinHongKong.Developmental Psychology. 20(6):1004-1016.

Ho,D.Y.F.1986.ChinesePatternsofSocialization:ACriticalReview.InM.Bond (Ed.),The Psychology of the Chinese People (pp. 1-37).NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.

Ho,D.Y.F.1989.ContinuityandVariationinChinesePatternsofSocialization.Journal of Marriage and the Family. 51 (1):149-163.

Ho,D.Y.F.1996.FilialPietyandItsPsychologicalConsequences.InM.H.Bond(Ed.),The Handbook of Chinese Psychology(pp.479-498).HongKong:OxfordUniversityPress.

Hsu,F.L.K.1981.American and Chinese Passage to Differences(3rded.).Honolulu:UniversityofHawaiiPress.

Jose,P.E.,Huntsinger,P.R.,&Liaw,F.R.2000.ParentalValuesandPracticesRelevanttoYoungChildren’sSocialDevelopmentinTaiwanandtheUnitedStates.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(6):677-702.

Lau, S.,&Cheung, P.C. 1987.Relations betweenChinese adolescents’perceptionsofparentalcontrolandorganizationandtheirperceptionofparentalwarmth.Developmental Psychology., 223 (5):726-729.

Lerner,R.M.,Castellino,D.R.,Terry,P.A.,Villarruel,F.A.,&Mckinney,M.H.2002.DevelopmentalContextualPerspectiveonParenting.InM.H.Bornstein(Ed.),Handbook of Parenting(2nded.,Vol.2BiologyandEcologyofParenting,pp.285-309).London:Erlbaum.LeVine,R.A.1982.Culture, Behaviour and Personality.NewYork:Aldine.

LeVine,R.A.1988.HumanParentalCare:UniversalGoals,CulturalStrategies,IndividualBehaviour. InR.A.LeVine,P.M.Miller&M.M.West(Eds.),New Directions for Child Development: Parental Behaviour in

Page 16: Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9 (Jun) 2006: 165-180jps.uum.edu.my/images/jps/vol-12/JPS-VOL-12-2006-165-180.pdf · dalam menggambarkan tingkahlaku bukan kebaratan di kalangan ibubapa

180 Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial 9

ConceptualizationattheInterfaceofChildDevelopmentandCulture.International Journal of Behavioral Development. 9.545-569.

Supple,A.J.,Peterson,A.C.,&Bush,K.R.2004.AssessingtheValidityofParentingMeasuresinSampleofChineseAdolescents.Journal of Family Psychology. 18 (3):539-544.

Tobin,J.,Wu,D.,&Davidson,D.1987.Preschool in 3 Cultures.NewHaven,CT:YaleUniversityPress.

Trommsdorff,G.,&Iwawaki,S.1989.Students’PerceptionsofSocializationandGenderRoleinJapanandGermany.

International Journal of Behavioral Development. 12:485-493.Wu,D.Y.H.1996).ChineseChildhoodSocialization.InB.M.H(Ed.),The

handbook of Chinese Psychology(pp.143-154).HongKong:OxfordUniversityPress.

Wu,D.Y.H.,&Tseng,W.S.1985.Introduction:ThecharacteristicsofChineseculture. InD.Y.H.Wu&W.S.Tseng.(Eds.),Chinese Culture and Mental Health.NewYork:AcademicPress.

Wu,P.,Robinson,C.C.,Yang,C.,Hart,C.H.,Olsen,S.F.,Porter,C.L.,etal.,2002.SimilaritiesandDifferencesinMothers’ParentingofPreschoolersinChina and theUnitedStates. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 26(6),481-491.

Jo-PeiTanFakultiEkologi,UniversitiPutraMalaysia,Serdang,SelangorDarulEhsan@UniversityofOxfordEngland

AnnBuchanan,Ph.DProfesorUniversityofOxfordEngland

ZahyahHanafi,Ph.DFakultiSainsKognitifdanPendidikan06010UniversitiUtaraMalaysiaSintok,KedahDarulAman,Malaysia