[email protected] & atmospheric studiesphysics & engineering physics,...

29
[email protected] a Space & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of Flux Transfer Events Kathryn McWilliams and Matt Wessel University of Saskatchewan

Post on 21-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of Flux Transfer Events

Kathryn McWilliams and Matt WesselUniversity of Saskatchewan

Page 2: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

From Scholer, 1995

FTE ModelsFTE Models

Page 3: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected]

FTEs at the MagnetopauseFTEs at the Magnetopause

(Russell & Elphic, 1979)

bipolar field variation

Page 4: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Magnetopause(Equator-S)

Ionosphere(SuperDARN)

(Neudegg et al., 2001)

Flux Transfer Events at the MagnetopauseFlux Transfer Events at the Magnetopause

bipolar boundary-normal FTE signatures

poleward moving radar auroral forms (PMRAFs)

Page 5: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Poleward Moving Radar Patches (STARE)Poleward Moving Radar Patches (STARE)

• poleward moving patches during Aug 28, 1978, storm

• patches emanate from polar cap boundary

(Sofko et al., 1979; 1985)

Page 6: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

STARE Patches & GEOS-2 M’pause CrossingsSTARE Patches & GEOS-2 M’pause Crossings

(Sofko et al., 1979; 1985)

GEOS-2footprintin patch

upwellingions

GEOS-2footprintpolewardof patch

10X fewerupwelling

ions

Page 7: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Pulsed Ionospheric Flows (PIFs) vs. PMRAFsPulsed Ionospheric Flows (PIFs) vs. PMRAFs

oscillating flow magnitude(with continuous data)

discrete poleward movingpatches (with data gaps)

PMRAFsPMRAFs

PIFsPIFs

Page 8: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected]

MHD Simulation – No Dipole TiltMHD Simulation – No Dipole Tilt

• Raeder, Annales Geophysicae, 2006

• “Stagnation line” – separates northward and southward flow

• Relatively smooth flow away from subsolar point (Earth-Sun line)

• No evident plasmoids

• Reconnection relatively smooth

Space & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 9: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected]

MHD Simulation – Large Dipole TiltMHD Simulation – Large Dipole Tilt

• Raeder, Annales Geophysicae, 2006

• “Stagnation line” located off Earth-Sun line, towards winter hemisphere

• Reconnection X-line forms winter-ward of Sun-Earth line

• Plasmoid forms in region of flow towards winter cusp

• Field lines draped around plasmoid from summer cusp form second X-line

• Plasmoid moves towards winter cusp

• No plasmoid observed in summer hemisphere

Space & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 10: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected]

3D Simulations – Development Along Magnetopause3D Simulations – Development Along Magnetopause

• Raeder, Annales Geophysicae, 2006

Space & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 11: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection• Patch of

SuperDARN backscatter:– footprint of

reconnected field lines

– measured by two overlapping SuperDARN radars (CUTLASS)

• Compared patch motion to ExB drift

(McWilliams et al., 2001)

Page 12: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

• patch expands and moves azimuthally• convection speed differs from patch motion at first

2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection

Page 13: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

• Two phases of motion: (1) reconnection (2) convection

• FTEs are not necessarily “small”

2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection

1

2

Page 14: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Recent ObservationsRecent Observations

• Korotova & Sibeck, GRL, 2008

• Considered m’pause crossings

• Interball-1 on dayside only during northern summer months; north=summer, south=winter

• Included only FTEs during neg. IMF Bz– Bz < -1 nT

• Interball-1 FTEs observed exclusively in WINTER hemisphere

Page 15: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Signatures of FTEsSignatures of FTEs

4 hours UT

Geotail FTEs

SuperDARN poleward moving forms 18 Jan 1999 (NH winter)

McWilliams et al., AG, 2004

Page 16: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Survey of Poleward Moving Radar Auroral FormsSurvey of Poleward Moving Radar Auroral Forms

• only examined poleward moving forms (PMRAFs)

• no modulated continuous drifts (PIFs)

• Radar Frequency is important!

• Before 2002 used single day and single night transmitter frequency

• Con: You have to be lucky to get good propagation

• Pro: Motion of patches is geophysicalfrequency change

Page 17: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Survey of SuperDARN PMRAFsSurvey of SuperDARN PMRAFs

• Noted days when PMRAFs evident (visual inspection)

• viewing angle important

Page 18: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Comparing N&S Hem.Comparing N&S Hem.

• The “one hope” frequency makes things difficult

• Not guaranteed that radio wave will refract enough to scatter back from cusp/mantle patches

Kerguelen = SH

Hankasalmi = NH

Ker Han

Page 19: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Question Answered!Question Answered!

• …sort of• Simultaneous poleward

moving form in winter and summer hemisphere

• This is RARE

Page 20: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Seasonal Dependence?Seasonal Dependence?

• Hankasalmi data only – Does not run “sounding” mode, so patch motion is geophysical

• Visual inspection of PMRAFs over nearly a full solar cycle

• 1997 – 2006

• FTE: 1893 days

• No FTE: 3468 days

(~35% FTE)

Page 21: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Probably Not…Probably Not…• Our day-frequency is not

optimized for season

• So we take what we can get

• The number of days with FTEs strongly resembles the amount of ionospheric backscatter overall throughout the year

• No seasonal trend in SuperDARN PMRAFs

Page 22: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected]

Summary and Future WorkSummary and Future Work

• Study motivated by simulations and observations of FTEs in winter hemisphere– Modelled plasmoids form in on winter side of Sun-Earth line– Modelled plasmoids carried through winter cusp– FTEs detected in winter hemisphere by Interball-1

• Reconnection footprint should map to both hemispheres, so particles are expected to precipitate into both hemispheres, regardless of where plasmoid forms

• SuperDARN does not see seasonal dependence on occurrence of PMRAFs– Simultaneous observations by Hankasalmi and Kerguelen

• More sophisticated analysis of statistics is required– More detail on duration of PMRAFs, beams involved, etc.– Relationship to upstream IMF orientation

Space & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 23: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 24: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] Fall AGU Meeting Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

• FTEs observed at Geotail only under certain IMF conditions (+By and +Bz).

• SuperDARN transients suggest FTEs occurred at all times, regardless of IMF orientation.

FTEs

SuperDARN PMRAFs

IMFBy

(McWilliams et al., 2004)

IMFBz

Geotail

Page 25: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 26: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 27: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 28: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

Page 29: Kathryn.mcwilliams@usask.caSpace & Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of

[email protected] & Atmospheric Studies Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan