Kerjasama Antar Peneliti

Ocky Karna Radjasa

Department of Marine Science

Diponegoro Univeristyocky_radjasa@yahoo.com;ocky_radjasa@undip.ac.i

d

Increasing pressures on University

Competition for “brains“ and funds (horizontal diversity)

Competition for academic performance and reputation as a result of performance-based funding, rankings etc. (vertical diversity)

Ketersediaan SDM (Guru Besar, Doktor, S2) Keberadaan dan aktivitas pusat penelitian/pusat

studi/pusat kajian Sumber dana penelitian Luaran penelitian Pengelolaan Penelitian di Perguruan Tinggi Ketersediaan sarana dan prasarana penelitian

Variabel Utama Pemetaan Kinerja Penelitian Perguruan Tinggi

THE-QS World University Rankings

Academic Peer Review 40% Academics indicate which field they

specialise in and then list up to 30 universities they regard as leaders in this field.

Composite score drawn from peer review survey (which is divided into five subject areas). Results compiled based on three years’ worth of responses totaling 6,354 in 2008.

Safeguards against individuals voting for their own university strengthened.

Rise of Asian universities is least apparent in this ranking.

International Staff 5% Score calculated based on the

proportion of Full Time Equivalent (FTE) faculty that are international.

Employer Review 10% Score based on responses to employer

survey. 2,339 responses in 2008. Recruiter names are sourced through QS

databases, media partners and partner schools & universities.

Responses are weighted by region to reach a final score.

Staff/Student 20% Score based simply on the student faculty

ratio, the higher the number of faculty per student the higher the score.

Full- and part-time numbers for staff and students obtained; FTEs used throughout as far as possible.

Citation/Staff 20% Score based on research

performance factored against the size of the research body .

Five years of publication data with citations from Scopus.

Number of citations is divided by the number of FTE staff to give an

indication of the density of research.

International Student 5% Score calculated based on the

proportion of total students that are international.

THE-QS Rankin

gs

12/6/09

Measuring Research Quality

Classic measure of research quality

Citations per staff member (not per paper)

Number of publication per staff

Source: Scopus (http://www.scopus.com

Perbandingan Jumlah Publikasi Antar Negara di ASEAN

Perbandingan Jumlah Sitasi Antar Negara di ASEAN

Problem faced by researchers: some facts

- Overlapped equipment- Overlapped topics- Less interaction- Individual endeavor- Limited networking- Lack of funding- Partial results

LOKAKARYA LEMBAGA PENELITIAN (2006)LOKAKARYA LEMBAGA PENELITIAN (2006)

KLASTER KEDOKTERAN DAN KESEHATAN MASYARAKATKLASTER KEDOKTERAN DAN KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT KLASTER AGROINDUSTRIKLASTER AGROINDUSTRI KLASTER SOSIAL HUMANIORAKLASTER SOSIAL HUMANIORA KLASTER SAINS TEKNOLOGI KLASTER SAINS TEKNOLOGI

ARAH KLASTER UNDIP TAHUN 2007ARAH KLASTER UNDIP TAHUN 2007

KLASTER KETAHANAN PANGAN: AgroindustriKLASTER KETAHANAN PANGAN: Agroindustri KLASTER KESEHATAN DAN OBAT-OBATAN:KLASTER KESEHATAN DAN OBAT-OBATAN:

Kedokteran, Kesehatan masyarakat, gizi, farmasiKedokteran, Kesehatan masyarakat, gizi, farmasi KLASTER ENERGI: Nuklir, bionergi, geothermal, hidro dllKLASTER ENERGI: Nuklir, bionergi, geothermal, hidro dll KLASTER SOSIAL EKONOMI HUMANIORA:KLASTER SOSIAL EKONOMI HUMANIORA:

Ekonomi, sosial, politik, budayaEkonomi, sosial, politik, budaya KLASTER SAIN TEKNOLOGI:KLASTER SAIN TEKNOLOGI:

Teknologi material baru, nano technology, informasi, transportasi, Teknologi material baru, nano technology, informasi, transportasi, pertahanan, control systempertahanan, control system

Change research phylosophy:

individual

Research group

Research cluster

CoE

Balance of Excellence and Diversity

Research ClusterGraduate School

Internal and externalstakeholders

Academic and Competitive agenda

Academic and Social agenda

Develop and support strong research/Field/unit/department

Become internationally visible

Develop high level research and teachingCater the need of student, junior staff,

community

Developing research collaboration

Definition: the working together of researchers to achieve the common goal of

Research Cluster Center of Excellence Interdisciplinary research groups Across-sector: A-B-G

Characteristics of Research Cluster

Intensive interactions Focus area of research Shared research facilities Transfer of knowledge Sustain and enhance collegiality Interdisciplinary research groups Intended to build capacity In the long run to support CoE

Research Clusters facilitate:

The sharing of research by providing the forum in which colleagues:

- talk to each other about their individual work, - take the step to write together on a topic, - develop research proposals and- do research collectively

Characteristics of CoE

- Unique research strength- National and internationally recognized expertise- Competitive academic environment- Given with targeted support to the creation of world-

standard research and education bases- Elevate universities to the world’s highest echelons

Measurement of research collaboration

Co-authorships (Multi and international) Senior-Junior relationship Supervisor-student relationship Joint patent application Joint project proposal

The benefits of research collaboration

Increased knowledge Higher scientific quality and recognition Generation of new idea Access to the state of the art equipment Networking for future works

Graduate School and RC

1. The change of setting that only interdisciplinary field of study will be accommodated

2. Opportunity to establish and develop RC

3. The creation of new interdisciplinary Study Program such Biotechnology, Climate Change and Global Warming