kierkegaard and crisis of modernity coursera course syllabus

4
Søren Kierkegaard Research Centre Jon Stewart Faculty of Theology Associate Professor University of Copenhagen Søren Kierkegaard: Subjectivity, Irony and the Crisis of Modernity Course Description: In this course we will explore how the Danish thinker Søren Kierkegaard (181355) deals with the problems associated with relativism, the lack of meaning and the undermining of religious faith that are typical of modern life. His penetrating analyses are still highly relevant today and have been seen as insightful for the leading figures of Existentialism, PostStructuralism and Post Modernism. It is often claimed that relativism, subjectivism and nihilism are typically modern philosophical problems that emerge with the breakdown of traditional values, customs and ways of life. The result is the absence of meaning, the lapse of religious faith, and feeling of alienation that is so widespread in modernity. Kierkegaard gave one of the most penetrating analyses of this complex phenomenon. But somewhat surprisingly he seeks insight into it not in any modern thinker but rather in an ancient one, the Greek philosopher Socrates. In his famous work The Concept of Irony Kierkegaard examines different forms of subjectivism and relativism as they are conceived as criticisms of traditional culture. He characterizes these different tendencies under the heading of “irony.” He realizes that once critical reflection has destroyed traditional values, there is no way to go back. But yet the way forward is uncertain. As the modern movements such as Existentialism, PostStructuralism and PostModernism reveal, the issues that Kierkegaard faced are still among the central problems of philosophy today. Part 1: Kierkegaard on Socratic Irony (Full text titles for abbreviations and links are listed at end of syllabus) Week 1 Course Introduction: The Life and Work of Kierkegaard as a “Socratic Task” Plato: The Euthyphro pp. 116 Plato: The Apology pp. 1737 Week 2 Kierkegaard, Martensen and Hegelianism at the University of Copenhagen Hegel: The Socratic Method Hist. of Phil., vol. 1, pp. 384389, pp. 397406 Hegel: The Daimon Hist. of Phil., vol. 1, pp. 421425 Hegel: The Fate of Socrates Hist. of Phil., vol. 1, pp. 430448 Supplemental Reading Hegel: The Principle of the Good Hist. of Phil., vol. 1, pp. 406411 Kierkegaard: Journal AA:12 KJN, vol. 1, pp. 1922

Upload: bolshie

Post on 30-Nov-2015

37 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Important course on Kierkegaard

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Kierkegaard and Crisis of Modernity Coursera Course Syllabus

Søren  Kierkegaard  Research  Centre   Jon  Stewart  Faculty  of  Theology                                      Associate  Professor  University  of  Copenhagen  

 Søren  Kierkegaard:  Subjectivity,  Irony  and  the  Crisis  of  Modernity  

 Course  Description:    In  this  course  we  will  explore  how  the  Danish  thinker  Søren  Kierkegaard  (1813-­‐55)  deals  with  the  problems  associated  with  relativism,  the  lack  of  meaning  and  the  undermining  of  religious  faith  that  are  typical  of  modern  life.  His  penetrating  analyses  are  still  highly  relevant  today  and  have  been  seen  as  insightful  for  the  leading  figures  of  Existentialism,  Post-­‐Structuralism  and  Post-­‐Modernism.    It  is  often  claimed  that  relativism,  subjectivism  and  nihilism  are  typically  modern  philosophical  problems  that  emerge  with  the  breakdown  of  traditional  values,  customs  and  ways  of  life.  The  result  is  the  absence  of  meaning,  the  lapse  of  religious  faith,  and  feeling  of  alienation  that  is  so  widespread  in  modernity.  Kierkegaard  gave  one  of  the  most  penetrating  analyses  of  this  complex  phenomenon.  But  somewhat  surprisingly  he  seeks  insight  into  it  not  in  any  modern  thinker  but  rather  in  an  ancient  one,  the  Greek  philosopher  Socrates.      In  his  famous  work  The  Concept  of  Irony  Kierkegaard  examines  different  forms  of  subjectivism  and  relativism  as  they  are  conceived  as  criticisms  of  traditional  culture.  He  characterizes  these  different  tendencies  under  the  heading  of  “irony.”  He  realizes  that  once  critical  reflection  has  destroyed  traditional  values,  there  is  no  way  to  go  back.  But  yet  the  way  forward  is  uncertain.  As  the  modern  movements  such  as  Existentialism,  Post-­‐Structuralism  and  Post-­‐Modernism  reveal,  the  issues  that  Kierkegaard  faced  are  still  among  the  central  problems  of  philosophy  today.    Part  1:  Kierkegaard  on  Socratic  Irony  (Full  text  titles  for  abbreviations  and  links  are  listed  at  end  of  syllabus)  Week  1    Course  Introduction:  The  Life  and  Work  of  Kierkegaard  as  a  “Socratic  Task”     Plato:  The  Euthyphro     pp.  1-­‐16     Plato:  The  Apology     pp.  17-­‐37                Week  2  Kierkegaard,  Martensen  and  Hegelianism  at  the  University  of  Copenhagen       Hegel:  The  Socratic  Method       Hist.  of  Phil.,  vol.  1,  pp.  384-­‐389,  pp.  397-­‐406     Hegel:  The  Daimon       Hist.  of  Phil.,  vol.  1,  pp.  421-­‐425     Hegel:  The  Fate  of  Socrates       Hist.  of  Phil.,  vol.  1,  pp.  430-­‐448       Supplemental  Reading     Hegel:  The  Principle  of  the  Good       Hist.  of  Phil.,  vol.  1,  pp.  406-­‐411     Kierkegaard:  Journal  AA:12       KJN,  vol.  1,  pp.  19-­‐22    

Page 2: Kierkegaard and Crisis of Modernity Coursera Course Syllabus

2

Week  3  Kierkegaard’s  View  of  Socrates       Kierkegaard:  “The  Daimon  of  Socrates”     CI,  pp.  157-­‐167               Kierkegaard:  “The  Condemnation  of  Socrates”  CI,  pp.  167-­‐183,  pp.  193-­‐197               Supplemental  Reading     Kierkegaard:  “The  View  Made  Necessary”       CI,  pp.  198-­‐214     Kierkegaard:  “The  Conflict  between  the  Old  and  the  New  Soap-­‐Cellar,”       Journal  DD:208,  KJN,  vol.  1,  pp.  278-­‐289        Part  2:  Kierkegaard  on  Romantic  Irony    Week  4  Kierkegaard,  Heiberg  and  History       Kierkegaard:  “The  World-­‐Historical  Validity     CI,  pp.  241-­‐271           of  Irony,  the  Irony  of  Socrates”         Supplemental  Reading     Kierkegaard:  “Introduction”       CI,  pp.  9-­‐12         Kierkegaard:  “Hegel’s  View  of  Socrates”       CI,  pp.  219-­‐237         Heiberg:  On  the  Significance  of  Philosophy  for  pp.  83-­‐119     the  Present  Age    Week  5  Kierkegaard,  P.M.  Møller  and  Friedrich  von  Schlegel     Kierkegaard:  “Irony  After  Fichte:  Fichte”     CI,  pp.  272-­‐286       Kierkegaard:  “Irony  After  Fichte:  Schlegel”     CI,  pp.  286-­‐301     Kierkegaard:  “Irony  as  a  Controlled  Element,     CI,  pp.  324-­‐329             the  Truth  of  Irony”         Supplemental  Reading     Hegel:  Fichte       Hist.  of  Phil.,  vol.  3,  pp.  479-­‐506     Hegel:  The  More  Important  Followers  of  Fichte   Hist.  of  Phil.,  vol.  3,  pp.  506-­‐508    Part  3:  Kierkegaard’s  Socratic  Task    Week  6  The  Conception  of  Kierkegaard’s  Socratic  Task:  1843  The  Trip  to  Berlin  and  the  Beginning  of  the  Authorship     Kierkegaard:  “Diapsalmata”     EO1,  pp.  17-­‐43     Kierkegaard:  “Problema  I”     FT,  pp.  54-­‐67       Supplemental  Reading     Martensen:  “Rationalism,  Supernaturalism”       pp.  127-­‐143  

Page 3: Kierkegaard and Crisis of Modernity Coursera Course Syllabus

3

  Kierkegaard:  “A  Word  of  Thanks  to  Professor     COR,  pp.  17-­‐21     Heiberg”        Week  7  Kierkegaard’s  Socratic  Task:  1844-­‐45  The  Development  of  the  Pseudonymous  Works     Kierkegaard:  “The  Absolute  Paradox”     PF,  pp.  37-­‐48       Kierkegaard:  The  Concept  of  Anxiety     CA,  p.  3,  p.  5,  p.  16,  pp.  134-­‐135     Kierkegaard:  “Preface  VIII”     P,  pp.  159-­‐170       Kierkegaard:  Stages  on  Life’s  Way     SLW,  pp.  481-­‐485     Kierkegaard:  “Becoming  Subjective”     CUP,  pp.  184-­‐188       Kierkegaard:  “The  Issue  in  Fragments”     CUP,  pp.  381-­‐384      Week  8  Kierkegaard’s  Socratic  Task:  1846-­‐55  The  Second  Half  of  the  Authorship  and  the  Attack  on  the  Church     Kierkegaard:  The  Point  of  View     PV,  p.  24,  pp.  54-­‐55,  pp.  68-­‐69     Kierkegaard:  “The  Socratic  Definition  of  Sin”     SUD,  pp.  90-­‐100     Kierkegaard:  “The  God-­‐Man  is  a  Sign”     PC,  pp.  9-­‐10,  pp.  81-­‐83,  pp.  124-­‐127     Kierkegaard:  “Was  Bishop  Mynster  a  ‘Truth       M,  pp.  3-­‐8     Witness’  ”     Kierkegaard:  The  Moment,  no.  10     M,  pp.  340-­‐347      Texts:      Plato:  The  Euthyphro,  in  Socrates  of  Athens,  trans.  by  Cathal  Woods  and  Ryan  Pack.    (Available  at  http://books.google.dk/books?id=v53iDJDi_M0C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false)  Plato:  Socrates’  Defense  (The  Apology),  in  Socrates  of  Athens,  trans.  by  Cathal  Woods  and  Ryan  

Pack.  (Available  at  http://books.google.dk/books?id=v53iDJDi_M0C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false)  Hegel:  Hist.  of  Phil.  =  Lectures  on  the  History  of  Philosophy,  vols.  1-­‐3,  trans.  by  E.S.  Haldane,  

London:  K.  Paul,  Trench,  Trübner  1892-­‐96;  Lincoln  and  London:  University  of  Nebraska  Press  1955.  

  (Vol.  1  available  at  http://archive.org/details/lecturesonhisto00hegegoog)  (Vol.  3  available  at  http://archive.org/details/lectureshistoryp03hegeuoft)  

Heiberg:  On  the  Significance  of  Philosophy  for  the  Present  Age  in  Heiberg’s  On  the  Significance  of  Philosophy  for  the  Present  Age  and  Other  Texts,  ed.  and  trans.  by  Jon  Stewart,  Copenhagen:  C.A.  Reitzel  2005  (Texts  from  Golden  Age  Denmark,  vol.  1),  pp.  83-­‐119.  

  (Available  courtesy  of  Museum  Tusculanum  Press:  see  http://www.mtp.hum.ku.dk/details.asp?eln=203519)  

Kierkegaard:  CA  =  The  Concept  of  Anxiety,  trans.  by  Reidar  Thomte  in  collaboration  with  Albert  B.  Anderson,  Princeton:  Princeton  University  Press  1980.  

Page 4: Kierkegaard and Crisis of Modernity Coursera Course Syllabus

4

Kierkegaard:  CI  =  The  Concept  of  Irony,  trans.  by  Howard  V.  Hong  and  Edna  H.  Hong,  Princeton:  Princeton  University  Press  1989.  

Kierkegaard:  COR  =  The  Corsair  Affair;  Articles  Related  to  the  Writings,  trans.  by  Howard  V.  Hong  and  Edna  H.  Hong,  Princeton:  Princeton  University  Press  1982.  

Kierkegaard:  CUP  =  Concluding  Unscientific  Postscript,  vols.  1-­‐2,  trans.  by  Howard  V.  Hong  and  Edna  H.  Hong,  Princeton:  Princeton  University  Press  1992,  vol.  1.  

Kierkegaard:  EO1  =  Either/Or  1,  trans.  by  Howard  V.  Hong  and  Edna  H.  Hong,  Princeton:  Princeton  University  Press  1987.  

Kierkegaard:  FT  =  Fear  and  Trembling,  trans.  by  Howard  V.  Hong  and  Edna  H.  Hong,  Princeton:  Princeton  University  Press  1983.  

Kierkegaard:  KJN  =  Kierkegaard’s  Journals  and  Notebooks,  ed.  by  Niels  Jørgen  Cappelørn  et  al.,  Princeton:  Princeton  University  Press  2007-­‐.  

Kierkegaard:  M  =  The  Moment  and  Late  Writings,  trans.  by  Howard  V.  Hong  and  Edna  H.  Hong,  Princeton:  Princeton  University  Press  1998.  

Kierkegaard:  P  =  “Preface  VIII”  in  Heiberg’s  Perseus  and  Other  Texts,  ed.  and  trans.  by  Jon  Stewart,  Copenhagen:  Museum  Tusculanum  Press  2011  (Texts  from  Golden  Age  Denmark,  vol.  6),  pp.  157-­‐180.  

  (Available  courtesy  of  Museum  Tusculanum  Press:  see  http://www.mtp.hum.ku.dk/details.asp?eln=203519)  

Kierkegaard:  PC  =  Practice  in  Christianity,  trans.  by  Howard  V.  Hong  and  Edna  H.  Hong,  Princeton:  Princeton  University  Press  1991.  

Kierkegaard:  PF  =  Philosophical  Fragments;  Johannes  Climacus,  or  De  omnibus  dubitandum  est,  trans.  by  Howard  V.  Hong  and  Edna  H.  Hong,  Princeton:  Princeton  University  Press  1985.  

Kierkegaard:  PV  =  The  Point  of  View,  trans.  by  Howard  V.  Hong  and  Edna  H.  Hong,  Princeton:  Princeton  University  Press  1998.  

Kierkegaard:  SLW  =  Stages  on  Life’s  Way,  trans.  by  Howard  V.  Hong  and  Edna  H.  Hong,  Princeton:  Princeton  University  Press  1988.  

Kierkegaard:  SUD  =  The  Sickness  unto  Death,  trans.  by  Howard  V.  Hong  and  Edna  H.  Hong,  Princeton:  Princeton  University  Press  1980.  

Martensen:  “Rationalism,  Supernaturalism  and  the  principium  exclusi  medii,”  in  Mynster’s  “Rationalism,  Supernaturalism”  and  the  Debate  about  Mediation,  ed.  and  trans.  by  Jon  Stewart,  Copenhagen:  Museum  Tusculanum  Press  2009  (Texts  from  Golden  Age  Denmark,  vol.  5),  pp.  127-­‐143.  

  (Available  courtesy  of  Museum  Tusculanum  Press:  see  http://www.mtp.hum.ku.dk/details.asp?eln=203519)