13th Biannual Conference of the German Cognitive Science Society 26 - 30 September 2016, Bremen, Germany

kogwis2016.spatial-cognition.de

Program and Information

Thomas Barkowsky chair

Zoe Falomir Llansola, Holger Schultheis, Jasper van de Ven

local organizing team

KogWis 2016SPACE FOR COGNITION

2

3

Program and Information 26 - 30 September 2016, Bremen, Germany

kogwis2016.spatial-cognition.de

KogWis 2016SPACE FOR COGNITION

4

Impressum: September 2016 Thomas Barkowsky, chair http://kogwis2016.spatial-cognition.de kogwis2016@cs.uni-bremen.de

5

ContentsWelcometoKogWis2016....................................................................................................6ConferenceOrganization......................................................................................................7GeneralInformation................................................................................................................8ConferenceProgram...............................................................................................................9 Monday,26September...................................................................................................9 Tuesday,27September..................................................................................................9 Wednesday,28September.........................................................................................11 Thursday,29September.............................................................................................12 Friday,30September....................................................................................................13KeynoteSpeakers...................................................................................................................15 RuthConroyDalton.......................................................................................................15 JimDavies...........................................................................................................................15 ThomasMetzinger..........................................................................................................16 FrancescaPazzaglia.......................................................................................................17 TerryRegier......................................................................................................................18Symposia....................................................................................................................................19Tutorials.....................................................................................................................................23SponsorsofKogWis2016...................................................................................................25PosterSession..........................................................................................................................26AdditionalEvents...................................................................................................................28LunchBreakSuggestions....................................................................................................30UniversityofBremenCampusMap................................................................................31ProgramOverview.................................................................................................................32

6

DearparticipantofKogWis2016:SpaceforCognition!

Wewould like to welcome you to the 13th meeting of the German Cognitive ScienceSocietyaswellas to thecityofBremen.Bremenhasa longhistorydatingback to theeighthcenturyasalivelyareaofcommerce,culture,andscience.Itisworld-famousforitsworld-heritagemonuments, for itsbeer,aswellasforneverhavingbeenvisitedbyfourelderlyanimals.

TheUniversityofBremen,onlyfounded45yearsago,hasbeenawardedin2012asoneof eleven Excellence Universities in the initiative of the German Federal Ministry ofEducationandResearchandtheGermanResearchFoundation.

Atthisyear'sKogWisconference,althoughresearchofallsubareasofcognitivesciencewillbepresented,thespecialmottois"SpaceforCognition".Forresearchinspatialcog-nition,theUniversityofBremenisoneofthemostprominentlocationsworld-wide.Fortwelveyears,BremenhasbeenrunningthetransregionalcollaborativeresearchcenterSFB/TR8 Spatial Cognition fundedby theGermanResearchFoundation. TheworkofthiscenterisbeingcontinuedintheBremenSpatialCognitionCenter(BSCC)since2015.AsthehighlightsofKogWis2016weinvitedfiverenownedkeynotespeakersthatwilladdress core topics of cognition from a variety of perspectives and disciplines. JimDavieswillelaborateonthedifferencebetweenmentalimageryandimaginationfromacomputationalmodelingpointofview.FrancescaPazzagliawilladdresstheacquisitionofspatialknowledgewithafocusontheinteractionofpiecesofinformationfromvari-ousperspectivesandsources.TerryRegierwillinvestigatehowsemanticsisconstraintacross natural languages due to the cognitive task of communicating and its require-ments.ThomasMetzingerwillargueforconsciousnessasanunintentional,subpersonalprocess rather than some form of intentionalmental action. And finally, Ruth ConroyDaltonwillexplainhowcognitionisrelatedtoarchitecturaldesignwithafocusonthequestionhowarchitecturalcomplexityaffectspeople'sexperienceofbuildings.

As submissions to KogWis 2016we received sixty extended abstracts that have beenthoroughly reviewed by themembers of the program committee. On the basis of thereviewsweaccepted23contributionsasoralpresentations,and29forposterpresenta-tion.Theauthorsof theacceptedcontributions thatare related to the topical focusofspatial cognition have been invited to submit an extended version of their work forpublicationinaconferencepost-proceedingsSpringerLNAIvolume.

TheoverallprogramofKogWis2016alsocomprisesanumberofinvitedsymposiaad-dressingspecifictopicsofcognitivescience,severaltutorials,adoctoralsymposium,aswell as the GK best paper talk and the presidential lecture. The scientific program iscomplementedbyawelcomereception,thesocialdinner,andtheGKSocietyMeeting.WeverymuchhopethatyouwillenjoyKogWis2016,thatyouwillengageininspiringchatswithcolleagues,andthatyouwillhaveawonderfultimeinBremen.ThomasBarkowskyZoeFalomirLlansolaHolgerSchultheisJaspervandeVen

7

ConferenceOrganizationThomasBarkowsky(chair)ZoeFalomirLlansola,HolgerSchultheis,JaspervandeVen(localorganizingteam)GraciaKranz(administration)AlexanderMittelstorb(technicalsupport)

ProgramCommitteeAnnaBelardinelli,UniversityofTübingenSvenBertel,Bauhaus-UniversitätWeimarSimonJ.Büchner,UniversityCollegeFreiburgMicheleBurigo,BielefeldUniversityMartinButz,UniversityofTübingenClausChristianCarbon,UniversityofBambergLewisChuang,MPIforBiologicalCyberneticsFrankDylla,UniversityofBremenEvelynFerstl,Albert-Ludwigs-UniversitätFreiburgPaoloFogliaroni,ViennaUniversityofTechnologyChristianFreksa,UniversityofBremenKlausGramann,TUBerlinJohannesHaack,UniversitätPotsdamMarcHalbruegge,TUBerlinKaiHamburger,Justus-Liebig-UniversityGiessenElisabethHein,UniversityofTübingenGeorgJahn,TUChemnitzMartinChristofKindsmüller,UniversitätHamburgMarkusKnauff,Justus-Liebig-UniversitätGiessenStefanKopp,BielefeldUniversityKai-UweKuehnberger,UniversityofOsnabrückHanspeterMallot,UniversityofTübingenMarkMay,Helmut-SchmidtUniversityTobiasMeilinger,MPIforBiologicalCyberneticsFranz-BenjaminMocnik,ViennaUofTechnologyUlrikeSusannePompe,UniversityofStuttgartFelixPutze,UniversityofBremenMarcoRagni,UniversityofFreiburgKai-FlorianRichter,UniversityofZurichBettinaRolke,UniversityofTübingenJaschaRüsseler,UniversityofBambergNeleRusswinkel,TechnischeUniversitätBerlinUteSchmid,UniversityofBambergFriederStolzenburg,HochschuleHarzAnnaStrasser,Humboldt-UniversitätzuBerlinThoraTenbrink,BangorUniversityManfredThüring,TechnischeUniversitätBerlinSabineTimpf,UniversityofAugsburgConstanzeC.Vorwerg,UniversityofBielefeldDiedrichWolter,UniversityofBamberg

8

GeneralInformation

ConferenceLocationKogWis 2016 takes place on the University of Bremen campus in thebuilding NW1 (campus plan 1C, bus/tram stop "Universität-Süd", tram 6,bus21,22,28,31,630,670).Address:UniversityofBremenNW1,Otto-Hahn-Allee,28359Bremen.

ParkingThereareseveralparkingareasinthevicinityofNW1building,bothfreeofchargeandatreasonableper-dayfees.

RegistrationandconferencebadgeTheconferenceregistrationdeskwillopenonMonday,16September12:30.Allparticipantsarekindlyaskedtoweartheirconferencebadgeatalltimesduringtheconference.

ConferenceOfficeIn case of any questions please contact us via kogwis2016@cs.uni-bremen.deorbyphone+49–(0)15233551011(GraciaKranz).

WirelessInternetWirelessinternetisavailablethroughouttheconferencesiteviaeduroam.Ifyoudonotalreadyhaveaneduroamaccountpleasecontacttheregistrationdesk/conference office for temporary access for the duration of the con-ference.

ReceiptofconferencefeepaymentIfyouneedareceiptaboutthepaymentoftheconferencefeepleasecontactusviakogwis2016@cs.uni-bremen.de.

9

KogWis2016:ProgramMonday,26September2016

14:00 ParallelSessionI S1:FormalandCognitiveReasoning(H2)

Organizers:ChristophBeierle,GabrieleKern-Isberner,MarcoRagni,FriederStolzenburg14:00MarkusKnauff:Newframeworksofrationality

14:40ChristianFreksa:Affordanceandconstraintsascomplementarynotionsinproblemsolving15:20FrancoisBry:Humancomputation:combiningthecomputationalpowerofmachinewithcognitiveskillsofhumans

S3:CognitionandManualAction(H3)

Organizers:DirkKoesterandChristianSeegelke

AbdeldjallilNaceri,AlessandroMoscatelli,RobertHaschke,MarcoSantello,MarcErnst:Digitpositionandforcesynergiesduringunconstrainedgrasping

AnnaBelardinelli,MartinButz:Anticipatingobjectinteractionwiththeeyesandwiththehands:perceptualandplanningaspects

RumeysaGunduz,ThomasSchack,DirkKoester:TheneurophysiologicalinteractionbetweenworkingmemoryandgraspingmovementsChristianSeegelke,IrisGüldenpenning,JulianDettling,ThomasSchack:Distincteffectsofvisuomotorprimingonactionpreparationandmotorprogramming

MarcHimmelbach,MareikeGann:Interactionsofcorticalnetworksforobjectrecognitionandobjectgrasping

16:00 CoffeeBreak16:30 KeynoteTalk:JimDavies:ImaginationandMentalImagery(H1)

17:30WelcomeReception

Tuesday,27September2016

09:00 ParallelSessionII

S4:DynamicsofSketchingandSketchUnderstanding(DySket)(S1360) Organizers:AhmedM.H.Abdel-Fatah,HaythemO.Ismail,Kai-UweKühnberger

MalumboChipofya:Sketchmapia–Aframeworkforrecognition,interpretationandvisualizationofsketchmaps,andintegrationofsketchmapsandmetricmaps

StefanSchneider:Mentalobjectmanipulationtogeneratesketches

OliverKutz:Imageschemas,conceptinvention,andgeneralisation

10

O1:Language(H2)

Sessionchair:MarkusKnauffThomasKluth,MicheleBurigo,HolgerSchultheis,andPiaKnoeferle:Theroleofthecenter-of-massinevaluatingspatiallanguage

EvelynC.FerstlandLenaDietsche:“FragenSieIhrenArztoderApotheker!”–Howgrammaticalgenderinfluencesrepresentationsofdiscoursereferents

KirstenBergmannandStefanKopp:Timepressureeffectsonsemanticspeech-gesturecoordination

O2:PlaceRecognitionandLocalization(H3)

Sessionchair:ChristianFreksaMarcHalfmann,ViktoriaProzmann,NinaWalker,andHanspeterA.Mallot:Walldistanceasacueinhumanplacerecognition

HanspeterA.MallotandStephanLancier:Amaximum-likelihoodapproachtoplacerecognitionfromdistantlandmarks

RulvonStülpnagel,VincentLangenfeld,andChristophHölscher:Self-localizationaccuracyandspatialambiguityofhumansandrobotsinacomplexbuilding

11:00 CoffeeBreak

11:30 KeynoteTalk:TerryRegier:SemanticTypologyandtheSapir-WhorfHypothesisinComputationalPerspective(H1)

12:30 LunchBreak

14:00 ParallelSessionIII S4:DynamicsofSketchingandSketchUnderstanding(DySket)(S1360)

Organizers:AhmedM.H.Abdel-Fatah,HaythemO.Ismail,Kai-UweKühnbergerKirstenBergmann:Socialsketching–Depictinggesturesinmultimodalcommunication

ZoeFalomirLlansola:Imageunderstandingusingsketchingandqualitativedescriptors

Kai-UweKühnberger:Theroleofconceptsinsketchunderstanding

O3:CategorizationandSpatialRepresentation(H2) Sessionchair:TarekBesold

AlexanderLotzandNeleRusswinkel: Modellingdifferentstrategiesinmentalrotation

ChristinaZellerandUteSchmid: Rulelearningfromincrementalpresentationoftrainingexamples:ReanalysisofacategorizationexperimentJohannesLohmannandMartinV.Butz: Multisensoryconflictyieldsadaptationinperipersonalandextrapersonalspace

CordulaVesper,TiffanyMorisseau,GüntherKnoblich,andDanSperber: Matchingmatchboxes:Co-actorscreatenonconventionalcommunicationsystemsforjointaction

16:00 CoffeeBreak

11

16:30 KeynoteTalk:ThomasMetzinger:MentalAutonomyandMentalAction(H1)

17:30 PosterTeasers(H1)18:00 PosterSession

Wednesday,28September201609:00ParallelSessionIV

O4:EmbodiedCognition(H2)

Sessionchair:TobiasMeilingerMarcHalbrügge: Rethinkingthekeystroke-levelmodelfromanembodiedcognitionperspectiveSebastianKahlandStefanKopp: Communicativesignalingandself-otherdistinction:Nextstepsforanembodiedhierarchicalmodelofdynamicsocialbehaviorandcognition

DirkKoester,ThomasSchack,andIrisGüldenpenning:Motorexpertisefacilitatesthecognitiveevaluationofbodypostures:AnERPstudyNoshabaCheema,LexFridman,RuthRosenholtz,andChristophZetzsche: Optimumstatisticalrepresentationobtainedfromanintermediatefeaturelevelofthevisualhierarchy

O5:SpatialPerception(H3)

Sessionchair:EvelynFerstl

BasilWahn,SupriyaMurali,andPeterKönig: Auditorystimulusdetectionpartiallydependsonvisuospatialattentionalresources

BettinaE.Bläsing: Recognitionofself-performed,butvisuallyunfamiliardance-likeactionsfrompoint-lightdisplays

11:00 CoffeeBreak

11:30 KeynoteTalk:RuthConroyDalton:ArchitecturalDesign,Complexity,andCognition(H1)

12:30LunchBreak

14:00 ParallelSessionV O6:ComputationalModelingandAssistance(H2)

Sessionchair:JaspervandeVenMarcHalbrüggeandHolgerSchultheis: ModelingkitchenknowledgewithLTMC

FelixPutze,EliasBordolo,andTanjaSchultz: Model-driveninteractionstrategiesofadialogsystemfornavigationandinformation

O7:PredictiveProcessing(H3)

Sessionchair:NeleRußwinkelWanjaWiese: Whatarethecontentsofrepresentationsinpredictiveprocessing?KingaJęczmińska: Complementaritybetweentheglobalworkspacetheoryandthesensorimotortheory

12

15:00 DoctoralSymposium(H1)

Organizer:ZoeFalomirLlansolaIrisSauerbrei:3D-shape-perceptionstudiedexemplarilywithtetrahedronandicosahedronasprototypesofthepolaritiessharpversusround

ErikAndresen:Representationofwayfindingandperceptionabilitiesinagent-based-models

ChristinaZeller:Inductivelearningofcategories,betweencognitivemodelingandmachinelearning

16:00 CoffeeBreak

16:30DoctoralSymposium(H1) Organizer:ZoeFalomirLlansola

JuanPurcallaArrufi:Modellinghumannavigation:Cognitiveaspectsofobstacleavoidance

MartinHillebrand:Cognitivecomplexityofnumbersequencecompletionproblems:EvidenceforhumanheuristicsEfrosiniCharalambous:Updatingofspatialrepresentations:TwopilotERPexperiments

LauraIsraelandEvelynC.Ferstl:Thecomprehensionofverbaljokes:Avisual-worldstudy

AhmadMahdeyanandEbrahimSoltaniNasab:Cognitivesciencesstrategiesforfuturesstudies(Foresight)

18:00 GKSocietyMeeting(H1)

Thursday,29September2016

09:00 ParallelSessionVI

S2:SpatialRepresentationandProcessing-WhatInformationDoWeNeed?(H1)

Organizers:TobiasMeilinger,RamonaGrzeschik

RamonaGrzeschik,RuthConroyDalton,AntheaInnes,andJanWiener:Effectsofageingonlandmarkrecognition

MicheleBurigo:Theinfluenceofextra-linguisticinformationonspatiallanguageHolgerSchultheis:Adjustingourviewonperspectivetaking:scalablerepresentationstructuresandreferenceframes

JaschaGruebel,TylerThrash,VictorSchinazi,andChristophHoelscher:Thedecompositionofnavigationbehaviorintosimpletasks

ChantalHoreis,CeliaFoster,KatsumiWatanabe,HeinrichH.Bülthoff,andTobiasMeilinger:Theintegrationofroomviews

JakubKrukarandAngelaSchwering:WhatisOrientation?

13

S5:SocialPerception(H2)

Organizer:TobiasSchlichtShaunGallagher:Perceivingtheembodiedmind

J.SuilinLavelle:Whichpsychologicalstatescanwesee?

TobiasSchlicht:Onthenatureandfunction(s)ofsocialperceptionT1:DetectingandDiscouragingNon-CooperativeBehaviorinOnlineRatingTasks(S1360)

Instructors:JanaHäusslerandTomJuzek11:00 CoffeeBreak

11:30KeynoteTalk:FrancescaPazzaglia:AcquiringSpatialKnowledgefromDifferentSourcesandPerspectives:Abilities,Strategies,Representations(H1)

12:30 LunchBreak14:00 ParallelSessionVII

S6:MentalFilesinCognitiveScience:Corecognition,ConceptsandMindreading(H1)

Organizer:AlbertNewen

AlbertNewen:MentalfilesandconceptsFrancoisRecanati:Mentalfilesinadynamicperspective

JosefPerner:Mentalfilestheoryofmind

JouliaSmortchkova:Coreagencycognition:fromobject-filestoagent-filesT1:DetectingandDiscouragingNon-CooperativeBehaviorinOnlineRatingTasks(S1360)Instructors:JanaHäusslerandTomJuzek

T2:KantandCognitiveScience(H2)

Instructor:TobiasSchlicht16:00 CoffeeBreak

16:30 PresidentialLecture(H1):KaiVogeley

17:00 GKBestPaperTalk(H1):FabianSchrodtandMartinV.Butz:Justimagine!Learningtoemulateandinferactionswithastochasticgenerativearchitecture

19:30 SocialDinner("KaffeeMühle",AmWall212,28195Bremen)

Friday,30September2016

09:00ParallelSessionVIIIT3:WorkshoponCreativity(S1360)

Instructor:BipinIndurkhya

14

T4:IntroductiontoCognitiveModelingwithACT-R(H1)

Instructors:NeleRußwinkelandSabinePrezenskiT5:BayesianDataAnalysis:MainIdeas,Practices,andTools(H3)

Instructors:MichaelFrankeandFabianDablander

11:00 CoffeeBreak11:30 ParallelSessionIX

S7:PROSOCRATES:ProblemSolving,CreativityandSpatialReasoninginCognitiveSystems(S1360)Organizers:Ana-MariaOlteteanuandZoeFalomir

AnnaFedor,IstvánZachar,AndrásSzilágyi,MichaelÖllinger,HaroldP.deVladar,EörsSzathmáry:Insightandevolution

ChristianFreksa:Ontheroleofphysicalspaceforcommonsenseproblemsolving

T4:IntroductiontoCognitiveModelingwithACT-R(H1) Instructors:NeleRußwinkelandSabinePrezenski

12:30LunchBreak14:00 ParallelSessionX

S7:PROSOCRATES:ProblemSolving,CreativityandSpatialReasoninginCognitiveSystems(S1360)Organizers:Ana-MariaOlteteanuandZoeFalomir

BipinIndurkhya:Experience,understandingandcreativity

Ana-MariaOlteteanu:Towardsre-representationincognitivesystemsKai-UweKühnberger:Challengesanddirectionsformakingcognitivesystemscreative

ZoeFalomir:Qualitativereasoningmodelstohelpsolvingspatialabilitytests

T4:IntroductiontoCognitiveModelingwithACT-R(H1)

Instructors:NeleRußwinkelandSabinePrezenskiT5:BayesianDataAnalysis:MainIdeas,Practices,andTools(H3)

Instructors:MichaelFrankeandFabianDablander

16:00 CoffeeBreak EndofKogWis2016

15

KeynoteSpeakers

Ruth Conroy Dalton is Professor ofBuilding Usability and Visualisationat the University of Northumbria atNewcastle,situatedintheNorthEastof England.She is an alumnus ofUniversity College London. As alicensedarchitect,shehasworkedforFoster and Partners (London) andSheppard Robson Corgan Architects(London); keyprojects onwhich shehasworkedincludetheCarréd’Artde

Nîmes, in France, the Palaçio de Congresos in Valencia, Spain, and the Kings CrossInternationalTerminal, London (unbuilt). Shehas taught at theArchitecturalAssocia-tion,London,theGeorgiaInstituteofTechnology,Atlanta,USAandtheBartlettSchoolofArchitecture, UCL. Ruth Conroy Dalton’s research interests are centred around therelationshipbetweenthespatial layoutofbuildingsandenvironmentsand theireffectonhowpeopleunderstandandinteractinthosespaces.Sheisanexpertinspacesyntaxanalysis,architecturalandspatialcognitionandpedestrianmovement/wayfinding.Sheispassionatelyinterestedinplacingtheuseratthecentreofarchitecturaldesign.

ArchitecturalDesign,Complexity,andCognitionInearlierworkbyDalton(andcollaborators),itwassuggestedthattherearethreedis-tantways inwhichcognitiontakesplace inrelationtoarchitecturaldesign:1) the im-pactofarchitectural structure, functionand formonhumanperception, cognitionandbehaviour;2)theimpactofcognitivefactorsonthedesignofarchitecturalstructures;3)themeans of interaction and communication between the architect and building-userperspectives. Architectural cognition embraces all of these three types. This talk willfocusonarchitecturalcognitionandcomplexityand,inparticular,willonthelay-person/ building-user’s perception of complex architectural environments. It can be arguedthatcomplexity inarchitecturaldesignhastwoprincipal impactsonthebuildinguser:firstintheiraestheticappraisalandsecondintheirunderstandingofthebuildinglayoutand subsequent wayfinding through a complex environment. This keynote will coverboth of these aspects of architectural but will focus on/describe experiments on thelatter.

Jim Davies is an associate professor in the Institute of Cognitive Science at CarletonUniversity,wherehehaswon several teaching awards.Hehasdegrees inphilosophy,computer science, and cognitivepsychology.Asdirector of the Scienceof ImaginationLaboratory, he explores processes of imagination in humans andmachines, and spe-cializes in artificial intelligence, analogy, problem-solving, and the psychology of art,religion, and creativity. His work has shown how people use visual thinking to solveproblems,andhowtheyvisualizeimaginedsituationsandworlds.

16

He is author of over 50 peer-reviewedpublications in the fields of cognitivescience, artificial intelligence, philosophy,and psychology. He is a regular con-tributor to Nautilus magazine, and wrotethe popular science bookRiveted: TheScience of Why Jokes Make us Laugh,MoviesMakeusCry,andReligionMakesusFeel One with the Universe. He has beenasked to speakat threeTEDxevents, andhisworkwasfeaturedontheBrainGamestelevisionprogram.

www.jimdavies.org.ImaginationandMentalImagery Whatisimagination,andhowisitdifferentfrommentalimagery?Inthistalk,JimDavieswilldiscusswhatscienceshowsabouthowimaginationworks,withafocusonhiscom-putationalmodelingofimaginationandhisneuralmodelofvisualmentalimagery.

Thomas Metzinger is a fellow at theGutenberg Research College (2014-2019).As a philosopher he has beenworking atthe interface of philosophy of mind andcognitive science for many years. More-over, he is interested in ethical, anthro-pological,andsocioculturalimplicationsofscientific progress in the neurosciences.Prof. Metzinger is the director of thetheoretical philosophy group and theneuroethics section of the philosophydepartmentof theUniversityofMainz, aswellas thedirectorof theMINDgroupattheFrankfurtInstituteforAdvancedStudy

(open-mind.net).From2005to2007hewaspresidentoftheGermanCognitiveScienceSociety, and from 2009 to 2011 he was president of theAssociation for the ScientificStudyofConsciousness.MentalAutonomyandMentalAction

Iwillhavetwocentralgoalsinthefirstpartofthistalk,whichexplorestherelevanceoflatest research on mind-wandering for theories of consciousness. First, conceptually,andinoppositiontowhatmanyphilosophersfollowingDescartesandKanttraditionallyhavelikedtobelieve,Iwillarguefortheclaimthatconsciousthoughtactuallyisasub-personalprocess,onlyrarelyaformofmentalaction,butratheranunintentionalformofmentalbehavior,anddemonstrablyformorethantwothirdsofourconsciouslife-time.The paradigmatic, standard form of conscious thought is non-agentive, it lacks veto-control, and involves an unnoticed loss of epistemic agency and goal-directed causalself-determination on the level of mental content. Second, I present an empirical hy-

17

pothesis:Therewillbeadetectableself-representationalblink (SRB),asmalltimewin-dowIwhichweareblindtoourselves,namely,whenshiftingfromonephenomenalself-modelor“unitofidentification”(UI)tothenext.Alludingtothewell-studiedphenome-non of the attentional blink (Raymond, Shapiro, and Arnell, 1992, Shapiro, Raymond,andArnell,1997),thenotionofa“self-representationalblink”referstothefactthatweare typically not able to consciously experience the actualmoment of transition frommindful,present-orientedself-awarenesstotheidentificationwiththe“protagonist”ofadaydream, the content of the self-model in autobiographical planning, etc.Phenomenologically,theSRBischaracterizedbyabrieflossofself-awareness,followedbyaninvoluntaryshiftinthephenomenalUI;functionally,wecandescribeitasafailureof attentional and/or cognitive self-control. The empirical prediction is that subjectsshould be blind to self-related stimuli during the SRB, andmymain hope is that theaudiencecanhelpindevelopingnovelexperimentalparadigmstotestthishypothesis.Iftimeallows,Iwillalsotakeacloserlookattheconceptof“mentalaction”inthesec-ond part. Can we conceptually accommodate mental actions under a predictive pro-cessing approach?Mymain positive claimwill be thatmental action is the predictivecontrolofeffectiveconnectivity,wherewhatispredictedistheepistemicvalueofstatesintegratedintothephenomenalself-modelundercounterfactualoutcomes.Metzinger,T.(2013).TheMythofCognitiveAgency:Subpersonalthinkingasacyclicallyrecurringlossofmentalautonomy.FrontiersinPsychology,4,931.

Metzinger; T. (2015).M-Autonomy. Journal of Consciousness Studies,22 (11-12), 270-302. Special Issue edited by Mihretu P. Guta and Sophie Gibb: Insights into the First-PersonPerspectiveandtheSelf-AnInterdisciplinaryApproach.

Francesca Pazzaglia is professor of Psy-chology and co-director of theMemory&LearningLabattheDepartmentofGeneralPsychologyoftheUniversityofPadua.Sheinvestigates individual differences in spa-tial skills, spatial learning and behavior,working memory in spatial orientationand spatial text processing. In particular,she is interested in exploringhow spatialability, spatial memory, and strategies inspatialrepresentationinteractinaffectingperformanceinawiderangeofspatial tasks, in young adults, aged people, and special populations (childrenwith nonverballearningdisabilitiesandMCIindividuals).Acquiring spatial knowledge from different sources and perspectives: abilities,strategies,representations

Theability to acquire spatial knowledge is very important in everyday life, and it hasbeenvery important to the survival of ourownandother species.Weacquire spatialknowledge starting fromavarietyof sensory inputs (e.g. vision, vestibular sense, kin-esthesis, motor afference) and relative encoding processes, which lead to the con-structionofaninternalrepresentationoftheenvironmentonwhichwerelytoperform

18

variousspatial tasks,suchasretracingaroute,estimatingdistancesanddirections,ordrawingamap(Wolbers&Hegarty,2010).Anenvironmentcanbeexperienced(anddescribed)fromdifferentperspectives(routeorsurveyperspectives;Taylor&Tversky,1992;Pazzagliaetal.,2012)andindifferentways,bymovingaroundinit,inspectingitfromabove,lookingatamap,orlisteningtoaverbal description. Learning experience and perspective can influence the resultingcognitivemapand,asaconsequence,theperformanceofspatialtasks(e.g.Thorndyke&Hayes-Roth,1982). Socananumberofother individual factors, includingspatial abil-ities,visuospatialworkingmemory(VSWM),senseofdirection(SOD),andspatialrep-resentationpreferences. Inmy talk I first introduce concepts such as SODand spatialstrategies, and thengoon todescribe anumberof instrumentswidelyused to assessthesevariables.ThenIreviewthemainoutcomesofseveralstudiesbasedontheuseoftheseinstruments.Thegoalistoshedlightonhowinteractionsamongthesevariablesaffectperformanceinspatialtasks.IalsoexaminetheroleofthesefactorsinconjunctionwiththatofspatialabilityandVSWMindetermining individualdifferences intheper-formanceofwayfindingtasks,maplearning,andspatialtextprocessing.

Terry Regier received his Ph.D. in Com-puter Science from UC Berkeley in1992.He subsequently taught at theUniversity of Chicago, in Psychology,before returning in 2009 to Berkeley,where he is now professor of LinguisticsandCognitiveScience,anddirectorof theCognitive Science Program.His researchexplorestherelationoflanguageandcog-nitionusingcomputationalmethods.

SemantictypologyandtheSapir-Whorfhypothesis in computational perspec-tive Whydolanguageshavethesemanticcategoriestheydo,andwhatdothosecategoriesrevealaboutcognition?Wordmeaningsvarywidelyacrosslanguages,butthisvariationis constrained. Iwill argue that thispattern reflects a rangeof language-specific solu-tions to a universal functional challenge: that of communicating preciselywhile usingminimal cognitive resources. I will present a general computational framework thatinstantiates this idea, andwill showhow that framework accounts for cross-languagevariationinseveralsemanticdomains.IwillthenaddresstheSapir-Whorfhypothesis-theclaimthatsuchlanguage-specificcategoriesinturnshapecognition.Iwillarguethatviewingthishypothesisthroughthe lensofprobabilistic inferencehasthepotential toresolve two sourcesof controversy: the challenge thishypothesis apparentlyposes tothewidespreadassumptionofauniversalgroundwork forcognition,and the fact thatsomefindingssupportingthehypothesisdonotalwaysreplicatereliably.

19

Symposia

SymposiumS1:FormalandCognitiveReasoning(Monday,14:00,H2)

Organizers:ChristophBeierle,GabrieleKern-Isberner,MarcoRagni,FriederStolzenburg

Reasoningabout(spatial)informationisusuallypervadedbyuncertaintyandsubjecttochange.Thisisnotuniquetohumanreasoning,butitalsoappliestocognitivesystems.Thus there is an increasing demand both from psychology and computer science fornon-classical reasoning approaches. So far, many advanced and sophisticated ap-proachesofknowledgerepresentationandreasoninghavenotyetbeenmadeaccessibleforcognitiveapproaches,andinsightsgainedfromcognitionareonlyrarelyreflectedinformalapproaches.Generally,peopleemploybothinductiveanddeductivereasoningtoarriveatbeliefs;butthesameargumentthat is inductivelystrongorpowerfulmaybedeductively invalid. Therefore, awide range of reasoningmechanisms has to be con-sidered. The field of knowledge representation and reasoning offers a rich palette ofmethods for uncertain reasoning both to describe human reasoning and tomodel AIapproaches.Beyondcomputationalaspects,thesemethodsaimtoreflecttherichvarietyofhumanreasoninginuncertainanddynamicenvironments.Theaimofthissymposiumistoaddressrecentchallengesandtopresentnovelapproachestouncertainreasoningin its broad sense, including new insights from cognitive psychology, neuroscience,cognitive computing, and human computation, combining psychological models, un-certain(spatial)reasoning,andcomputerscience.Reflectingthisfocus,thesymposium“FormalandCognitiveReasoning”atKogWis2016isorganizedjointlybytheGIspecialinterestgroupsWissensrepräsentationundSchließenandKognition.

Speakers:MarkusKnauff,ChristianFreksa,FrancoisBry

SymposiumS2:SpatialRepresentationandProcessing-WhatInformationDoWeNeed?(Thursday,09:00,H1)Organizers:TobiasMeilinger,RamonaGrzeschik

Spaceisamulti-faceteddimensionandtheawarenessandthecomprehensionofspatialinformation is critical for the interactionwith our environment. Different approacheshavebeenperformedtogaininsightintotheunderlyingmechanismsofspatialinforma-tion process. This symposium will bring together a selection of experimental andtheoretical approaches originating from Cognitive and Computer Science, Psychology,Linguistics, Geography, and Architecture to investigate the representation and pro-cessingofspatialinformation.In this symposium,wewill tackle the question how saliency and uniqueness of land-marks influenceroute learning,particularly inelderlywayfinders,andwilldiscuss therelationbetweenperceptualinformation,spatialrepresentationsandhowtheyareinte-gratedintospatiallanguage.Acomputationalmodelwillbepresentedthatexplainsper-spectivetakingintermsofajointinfluenceofinterferenceonthecognitiveandthemo-torlevel.Further,wewilllookintothepredictionofnavigationabilitywhichapparentlycannotbereducedtoacoreprocessingcapability.Wewilladdressthequestionsabouttheminimalroomrepresentationsformedindifferentlearningsituationsandhowthisrepresentational selectiondoesbalance costs from integrationand retrieval. Finally, aprototypicalwayfindingaidwillbepresentedwhichwasdevelopedwith the focusonexploringanddevelopingnewmeansofprovidingnavigationalinstructions.

20

Bringingtogetherresearchersandapproachesfromdifferentareaswillafforddifferentperspectivesonthequestionofwhichinformationisessentialwhencomprehendingandacting in a spatial context, and towhat extend information requirements overlap anddifferfordifferentspatialtasks.

Speakers:RamonaGrzeschik,MicheleBurigo,HolgerSchultheis,ChristophHölscher,TobiasMeilinger,JakubKrukar

SymposiumS3:CognitionandManualAction(Monday,14:00,H3)Organizers:DirkKoesterandChristianSeegelke

Thehumanhandisamarvelouscomplexandflexibletoolandpeoplehavealwaysbeenintriguedby itsmultifunctionalutilization.Manyof ourdaily activities require (inten-tional)physicalinteractionswithoneorbothhandsandpossiblywithmultipleobjects.Consequently, the domain of grasping and objectmanipulation provides a fascinatingfield of research for cognitive neuroscience, because both sensorimotor and cognitivefunctions are involved. In this symposium,wewill bring together scientists from dif-ferentdisciplineswhowillpresenttheirlatestresearchfromthefrontiersoftheinter-action of sensorimotor and cognitive processes in the context of grasping, using avarietyofdiverseapproachesandmethodologies.Specifically,datawillbepresentedonhowthecentralnervoussystemmasterstheredundancyinthedegreesoffreedomforthe upper limb by means of kinematic and force synergies during unconstrainedgrasping. In addition, examination of coordinative patterns between gaze and handmovementsusingeyetrackingprovidesinsightsintotheroleofeye-movementsintheplanning of sequential actions. Furthermore, the role of working memory and objectrepresentationsintheplanningandcontrolofreach-to-graspactionswillbediscussedusing behavioral (RT and kinematics), neurophysiological (EEG), and neuroimaging(fMRI)methods.Thissymposiumisanattempttoextendourunderstandingofgraspingand the interactions with other cognitive domains and to contribute to the furtherdevelopmentoflatestneurocognitivetheoriesofmovementsandcognition.

Speakers:AbdeldjallilNaceri,AlessandroMoscatelli,RobertHaschke,MarcoSantello,MarcErnst;AnnaBelardinelli,MartinButz;RumeysaGunduz,ThomasSchack,DirkKoester;ChristianSeegelke,IrisGüldenpenning,JulianDettling,ThomasSchack;MarcHimmelbach,MareikeGann

SymposiumS4:DynamicsofSketchingandSketchUnderstanding(DySket)(Tuesday,09:00and14:00,S1360)

Organizers:AhmedM.H.Abdel-Fatah,HaythemO.Ismail,Kai-UweKühnbergerDue to thesuccessof touch interfacesasmainstreamtools, cognitively inspiredAI re-search faces the challenge to develop human-computer interfaces that employ thecapacityofsketchunderstandingasabasisforenhancedcommunicationwithmachines.Sketchesoutperformlanguages inmoreeasilydrawingonone’swelldevelopedintuit-tions,especiallywhenspatialrelationsareofacentralconcern.Theyareusedinvariousways to communicate ideas, to support design processes by externalizing ideas, tounderstand complex relations or processes, and even to supportmemorization.How-ever,therecognitionorretrievalofsketchesbycomputationaltoolsisgenerallydifficult,andrequires longcomputationsorsimulationofcomplexmechanisms, suchasspatialreasoning,analogymaking,abstraction, learning,etc.,whicharenotas intuitiveas thehumans’processingforsketchproductionorrecognition.Moreover,whileclearlysome

21

picturesaresketchesandsomearenot,itisnotequallyclearwhethersomesketchesarepicturesandsomearenot.Asequenceofgestures, forexample,maybeacceptedasasketch,whileclearlynotapicture.And,ifapictureisworthathousandwords,doesthisholdalsoforsketches?

TheDySketsymposiumaimsatmoredeeplydiscussingthesetopicsonascientific,inter-disciplinarybasis.Howdohumansconceptualizeideasviasketching?Whatarethemainunderlyingcognitivemechanismsresponsible forrecognition?Whichpartsofasketchplaymoresignificantrolesthanothers?HowtobuildAImodelsguidedbythewayhu-mansoperateonsketchestoperformsimilartasks?

Speakers:MalumboChipofya,StefanSchneider,OliverKutz,KirstenBergmann,ZoeFalomirLlansola,Kai-UweKühnberger

SymposiumS5:SocialPerception(Thursday,09:00,H2)Organizer:TobiasSchlicht

Inthedebateaboutsocialunderstanding,thepossibilityofdirectlyperceivingthemen-tal states of others has been proposed as an alternative to cognitivelymore sophisti-catedstrategiesasformulatedbytheory-theoryandsimulation-theory.Whatisatstakein thisdebate iswhether thepsychologicalprocessesunderlying socialunderstandinghave to be conceived of as perceptual or cognitive or inferential. In this symposium,various questions concerning the possibility of direct social perception of states likeemotions and intentionswill be addressed. ShaunGallagher (University ofMemphis),oneof thechiefproponentsof socialperceptionwill clarifyhowperceptionandothermindsshouldbeconceivedforsocialperceptiontobepossibleanddefendthisproposalinthe lightofrecentobjections. J.SuilinLavelle(UniversityofEdinburgh) investigateswhetherproponentsofatheory-basedapproacharecommittedtotheclaimthatmentalstatesareunobservable.Shedefendsatheory-basedapproachbyexploringwhatkindsof psychological state can be considered observable if one is to take this approach,focusingparticularlyonwhethernon-folkpsychologicalstatescanbeperceived.Finally,TobiasSchlicht(Ruhr-UniversitätBochum)thendiscussessocialperceptionagainstthebackgroundofthedebatebetweenanenactiveperspectiveonperceptionandcognitionandamore traditional representationalistperspectiveon these capacities.Basedonanotion of perception in terms of predictive coding, the focus is on the structure andcontentof themental representationsunderlying social perceptionandpossible func-tionsforsocialperception.Speakers:ShaunGallagher,J.SuilinLavelle,TobiasSchlichtSymposiumS6:MentalFilesinCognitiveScience:Corecognition,ConceptsandMindreading(Thursday,14:00,H1)

Organizer:AlbertNewenAlthoughtheideaofmentalfilesasatoolinmentalrepresentationsofthehumanmindisnotanewoneinCognitiveScience,thereareremarkablefruitfulnewusagesofmentalfilestoexplainseveralphenomenawhichwerewaitingquitelongforanadequatetreat-ment.Thesymposiumaimstopresentsomeof thekeyphenomenaandarguethattheframework of mental files could help to make progress in understanding them. Theareas of application to prove the fruitfulness of the perspective of usingmental filesinclude:1. thedevelopmentofconcepts inontogeny,2.modesofpresentationandco-

22

reference,3.thedevelopmentoftheabilitytopasstheexplicitfalsebelieftaskand4.thedevelopmentofthecoreagencysystem(accordingtoSusanCareyandE.Spelke).Speakers:AlbertNewen,FrancoisRecanati,JosefPerner,JouliaSmortchkova

SymposiumS7:PROSOCRATES:ProblemSolving,CreativityandSpatialReasoninginCognitiveSystems(Friday,11:30and14:00,S1360)

Organizers:Ana-MariaOlteteanuandZoeFalomir

Problem-solving,computationalcreativity,humancreativecognitionandspatialcogni-tion are topics often treated separately, despite their major potential for synergies.Problem-solvinghasbeenapproachedindifferentwaysbyartificialintelligenceandthestudyofhumancognition.Forexample,humansfaceill-structuredproblem-solvingveryoften,howeverprocessestotacklesuchproblems,liketheuseofre-representation,arerarelyimplementedincognitiveagents.Computational creativity focuses on building creative artificial systems capable ofcreativefeatssimilartothoseachievedbyhumansandmodesofevaluationthatcanbeusedtoassesssuchsystems.However,theprocessesandrepresentationsinthefieldarerarelycomparedtothoseusedbyhumans.

Humancreativecognition investigates thewayhumanssolveamultiplicityofcreativetasks,fromthesimple(comingupwithanalternativeuseforanobject)tothecomplex(solving insight problems), asking questions about process. However, no tools andframeworks exist for implementing computational approaches to test hypotheses in aunifiedmanner.

Finally,spatialcognitionisknowntocontributetothedevelopmentofabstractthought,andhavearole in insightfulproblemsolving.However, theroleofspatialcognition israrelystudiedinconjunctionwithcreativity,andwithacognitivesystemsperspective,aimedatimplementingworkingmodels.Thetopicalfocusofthissymposiumistobringthesedisciplinestogether,bybringingindialogue specialists from each of the fields, as to produce new theoretical tools, ap-proaches and methodologies for the study of problem-solving, creativity and spatialreasoningincognitivesystems.

Speakers:BipinIndurkhya,Kai-UweKühnberger,ChristianFreksa,AnnaFedor,Ana-MariaOlteteanu,ZoeFalomir

23

TutorialsTutorial T1: Detecting and Discouraging Non-Cooperative Behavior in OnlineRatingTasks(Thursday,09:00and14:00,S1360)Instructors:JanaHäussler,TomJuzek

More and more researchers use crowdsourced rating tasks for data collection. In arating task, participants are asked to evaluate some stimuluswith respect to a givenscale(e.g.theyevaluatethesimilarityoftwostimuliona7-pointscale).However,pre-viousstudiesdemonstratedthatcrowdsourcingisquitesusceptibletonon-cooperativebehavior (NCB), i.e. someparticipantsarenot complyingwith the task.Critically,NCBhasasignificantimpactonthequalityoftheresultsthatgoesbeyondmerenoise.

Thisworkshoppresentsresponse-timebasedstrategiesfordetectinganddiscouragingNCB. In Session 1, we motivate their relevance, outline their functioning, and walkthrough the statistical part. We will show why a median-based criterion is moreeffectivethanamean-basedorabsoluteoneandwewill justifyaresponse-time-basedwarning mechanism that discourages NCB effectively. Common platforms used forcrowdsourcedratingstasks,e.g.,AmazonMechanicalTurkorProlificAcademic,donotofferresponsetimes,letalonereal-timeaccesstothem.Session2thereforeprovidesthehands-onknowledgenecessaryforsettingupanexternalratingwebsitethatallowstheresearcher to collect response times, to fully randomise items (with a Fisher-Yatesshuffle), to implement theon-line/real-timewarningmechanism, to intersperseboobytrapitems,andtocollectpersonaldatafromtheparticipants(usingJavaScriptandPHP;thecodewillbeprovidedandexplained,nopriortechnicalknowledgeisrequired).

TutorialT2:KantandCognitiveScience(Thursday,14:00,H2)Instructor:TobiasSchlicht

Theoretical positions from historical figures in philosophy are not only interesting intheirownrightbutcansometimesbeespeciallyhelpfulinteachingussystematicwaysof inquiry that are ignored or simply unknown in contemporary debates. It has beenclaimedthatmanyofKant’s ideasmakehimtheintellectualgodfatherofcognitivesci-ence (e.g.hisdistinctionofperceptsandconcepts,hismethodof transcendentalargu-ment). Inseveralrecentpublications,authorshavesuggestedthatvariousclaimsfromKant’s tentative Philosophy of Mind not only have counterparts in the contemporarycognitivescienceofthemindbutcanguidecognitivescienceinitsquesttodiscoverthefunction and nature of consciousness, perception and other phenomena.This tutorialhastwopurposes:First,to(a)outlinecentralclaimsofKant’sphilosophyofMind.ThisisnoeasytasksinceKanthasnotfullydevelopedafull-fledgedtheoryofconsciousnessormentalphenomena;rather,everythinghehastosayaboutthestructureandfunctionof mental phenomena is in the service of his epistemological project of developing atheoryofknowledge.Thesecondpurposeisto(b)situateKant’sclaimsincontemporarydebatesonconsciousness,(c)toevaluatewhichofhisclaimsarestillofuseforathor-oughlynaturalistapproach to themindand,morespecifically (d) toevaluatewhetherrecent claims that recent developments in cognitive neuroscience suggest a “Kantianbrain”arejustified.

24

TutorialT3:WorkshoponCreativity(Friday,09:00,S1360)

Instructor:BipinIndurkhyaHumancreativityhasalwaysfascinatedpsychologistsandcognitivescientists.Inthelastfiftyyearsorso,manycognitiveaspectsofcreativityhavebeenstudied,andbasedonthemmanytechniquesforstimulatingcreativityhavebeendeveloped.Inthisworkshop,youwillparticipate inacreativity-stimulatingexercisethat isbasedononesuchtech-nique. There are no prerequisites for participating, except to bring a fresh and openmind. This workshop is related to my talk in the KogWis 2016 symposiumPROSOCRATES:ProblemSolving,CreativityandSpatialReasoninginCognitiveSystems.

TutorialT4:IntroductiontoCognitiveModelingwithACT-R(Friday;09:00,11:30,and14:00;H1)

Instructors:NeleRußwinkel,SabinePrezenski,MarcHalbrügge,StefanLindnerACT-Ristheimplementationofaunifiedtheoryofhumancognition.Ithasaveryactiveanddiversecommunitythatusesthearchitecturetomodel laboratorytasksaswellasappliedscenarios.ThestructureofACT-R isorientedon theorganizationof thebrain.Thiscognitivearchitecturesstatestobehybridsinceitholdssymbolicandsubsymboliccomponents.Theaimofworkingoncognitivemodelswithacognitivearchitectureistounderstandhowbottlenecksanderrorsoccurinhumanbehaviouroccur.

InthistutorialthecognitivearchitectureACT-Risintroduced(J.R.Anderson,2007:Howcanthehumanmindoccurinthephysicaluniverse?NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress).The focus of the tutorial is on the symbolic parts. In the beginning a short overviewabout recentwork and ACT-R's benefit for applied cognitive science is given. Then ashort introduction of the background, structure and scope of ACT-R is provided. Twohands-onexamplesofhowtowriteACT-Rmodelsarethecorepartofthetutorial.Thefirst short example introduces important mechanisms of ACT-R (productions andchunks).Thisisfollowedbyanin-depthintroductiononmechanismssuchasvisualandmanualprocessing.Forthesecondexample,theparticipantsworkontheirownmodelversionof a letter-selection task.Assistance andadvicewill be givenduring the exer-cises.Differentsolutionsforthesecondexamplewillbediscussed.Intheendinforma-tiononfurthermechanismsofACT-Rsuchassubsymboliccomponentsforlearningpro-cessesaregiven.

Nopriorexperienceorprogrammingknowledgeisrequired.Pleasebringalaptopandpreferably download the ACT-R software (stand alone version) prior to the event(http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/software/).

TutorialT5:BayesianDataAnalysis:MainIdeas,Practices,andTools(Friday,09:00and14:00,H3)

Instructors:MichaelFranke,FabianDablanderBayesianapproachestostatistical inferenceareoftenportrayedasthenewcoolkidintownandheraldedas superior to classical techniques.Naturally, thehype isalsoper-ceivedcritically.ThiscourseismeanttocriticallyintroducetheBayesianapproachinanutshell.Participantswhoareasofyetunfamiliarwithitwillreceiveenoughinforma-tiontoformanopinionandtoknowwheretoobtainmoreinformationthatsuitstheirneeds.Thosewhoarefamiliarwiththemainideascanbenefitfromaconciserundown

25

ofthemostimportantrecentdevelopments.Inparticular,thiscoursewilldotwothings:(i)ontheconceptual level,weprovideanoverviewofthemainideas,advantages,andchallengesofBayesiandataanalysis,indirectcomparisontoclassicalapproaches;(ii)ona practical level,we give an executive summary of some of themost recent and con-venienttoolsforhands-onBayesiandataanalysis.

SponsorsofKogWis2016

26

PosterSession

ThepostersessionwillbeheldonTuesday27September,18:00-20:00.Posterboardsandpinswillbemadeavailablebefore theafternooncoffeebreak.Pleaseputupyourposterduringthecoffeebreak.

Every poster presenter is asked to give a very brief (max. 1 minute) oral teaserpresentationinthe17:30session(withoutvisualmedia).

BenjaminAngerer,CornellSchreiber,andStefanSchneider:Representationaldynamicsofproblemsolvinginimagery:Anexploratorycasestudy

PamelaBaessandChristinaBermeitinger:Twincompatibilities:StudyingspatialcognitionwithsocialSimonstimuli

Matthias-PhilippBaumann,WiebkeSchick,andHanspeterA.Mallot:Theimpactofsleeponnavigationandconsolidationofsurveyknowledge

LasseT.Bergmann,SiljaTimm,MaxWächter,AnkeDittmer,FelixBlind,CarmenMeixner,LarissaSchlicht,AnjaFaulhaber,JuheeJang,AaliaNosheen,SimeonKraev,MaxRäuker,LeonSütfeld,AchimStephan,PeterKönig,andGordonPipa:Moraldecisionmakinginautonomousvehicles

MartinG.Bleichner,BojanaMirkovic,andStefanDebener:DecodingspatialauditoryattentionusingearEEG

ArturCzeszumski,ErnestoAndrésLópezMontecinos,ChiaraCarrera,AnetteAumeistere,AnnXavier,BasilWahn,andPeterKönig:Learned knowledge about the co-actor's behavior influences performance in a joint visuomotor task

PhilippDehmel,KerstinJost,AquilesLuna-Rodriguez,MikeWendt,andThomasJacobsen:Quickandsustainedinhibitionofdistractorelicitedresponseactivationintaskswitching

HannaDrimallaandIsabelDziobek:Theroleoffacialmimicryincognitiveandemotionalempathyandeffectsofautistictraits

ZoeFalomirandEricOliver:Towardsimprovingusers’3Dspatialskillsusingaqualitative3Ddescriptorandacomputergame

MareikeGannandMarcHimmelbach:Thecorticalnetworkofusabilityevaluationsforunknowntools

TatianaGoregliadFjaellingsdal,EstherRuigendijk,StefanScherbaum,andMartinG.Bleichner:Neuralcorrelatesofsemanticexpectationinaconversation–AwirelessEEGstudyoftheN400effect

TobiasGrage,SimonFrisch,andStefanScherbaum:Theinteractiondynamicsofmeta-controlparametersandcongruencyproportioninspatialsetshifting

27

KarolineGreger,RebeccaAlbrecht,andRulvonStülpnagel:Landmarkpreferenceduringrouteencodingandretrieval

TobiasJakubowitz,AndréKowollik,andUteSchmid:Theimpactofahumanoidrobot’saction-selectionstrategyonhumans’perceivednaturalnessofinteraction–AuserstudywithNAOplayingrock-paper-scissors

MarjanDaneshvarKashkooli:SemanticsofPersianspatialtermǰelobasedonprincipledpolysemymodel

PrittyPatel-Grosz,GerhardJaeger,MatthiasHolweger,andNadinaKiss:Challengingthedistinctionbetweenpresuppositionholesandplugs(presentedbyNatashaKorotkova)

JohannaRenkerandGerhardRinkenauer:Learningtocopewithuncertaintyduringtheacquisitionofmentalmodels

StefanScherbaum,TobiasGrage,MoritzWalser,KatrinHummel,andMajaDshemuchadse:Dissociatingcomponentsofcognitiveflexibilityinsemanticspace:Continuousmeasures,dynamicmodelingandclinicalassessment

WiebkeSchick,MarcHalfmann,GregorHardiess,andHanspeterA.Mallot:Languagecuesintheformationofhierarchicalrepresentationsofspace

LauraSchmitz,CordulaVesper,NatalieSebanz,andGüntherKnoblich:Co-representationofothers’spatialtaskconstraintsinjointaction

TanjaSchultz,FelixPutze,TimoSchulze,RalfMikut,WolfgangDoneit,AndreasKruse,AnamariaDepner,IngoFranz,MarcAurelEngels,PhilippGaerte,DietmarBothe,ChristofZiegler,IreneMaucher,MichaelRicken,TodorDimitrov,JoachimHerzig,KeniBernardin,TobiasGehrig,JanaLohse,MarionAdam,MonikaFischer,MassimoVolpe,andClarissaSimon:I-CARE:Individualactivationofpeoplewithdementia

DianaSchwenke,MajaDhesmuchade,CordulaVesper,MartinG.Bleichner,StefanScherbaum:Let’sdecidetogether!Jointdelaydecision-makingimprovesdelaydiscounting

PulkitSinghal,AdityaAgarwala,andPriyankaSrivastava:Dopitchandspacesharecommoncode?

MichaelSprengel,MarkusHofmann,MikeWendt,AquilesLuna-Rodriguez,SaschaTamm,ThomasJacobsen,andArthurM.Jacobs:Recentresponseconflictmodulatesearlydistractorprocessing

AnnaKatharinaTrappandManfredThüring:Emotionaleffectsontimeestimatesduringintervalsupto5s

RulvonStülpnagelandChristophHölscher:Predictingpatternsinnavigator-drivenplacementoflandmarksforfuturewayfindingwithSpaceSyntax

28

AdditionalEvents

WelcomeReception

ThewelcomereceptiontakesplaceinthefoyerofNW1buildingonMondayafternoonafterthefirstkeynotelecture.Drinksandsnackswillbeofferedforyourconvenience.

GKSocietyMeeting

TheregularmeetingoftheGermanCognitiveScienceSocietywillbeheldonWednesdayat18:00inroomH1.

Agenda1. Begrüßung/PrüfungderBeschlussfähigkeit/Beschlussfassungüber

dieTagesordnung2. BerichtdesVorstandsundBerichteausderKommission

2.1 Nachwuchsförderung(StipendienIKundKogWis,Preise)2.2 ZeitschriftCognitiveProcessing,Publikationskomitee,LiaisonEditor2.3 Web-AufrittundRundschreibenandieMitglieder2.4 OrganisatorischesundFinanzen(BerichtderSchatzmeisterin,inkl.

Mitgliederentwicklung)3. BerichtderKassenprüfer4. EntlastungdesVorstands5. Vorstandswahl6. NachwahlenBeirat7. WahlderKassenprüfer20168. VorstellungnächsterTagungsort&TermindernächstenFachtagung20189. Sonstiges

SocialDinner

ThesocialdinnerwillbeheldonThursdayfrom 19:30 in the beautiful windmill"Kaffee Mühle"close to the city center ofBremen. The dinner will be served as abuffet with free drinks included. Pleasebring your voucher if you booked thesocial dinner in the online conferenceregistration process. Vouchers also areavailable at the conference registrationdesk.

Address:Am Wall 212, 28195 Bremen; bus/tramstop"Herdentor",tram4,6,8,bus24,25

29

30

LunchBreakSuggestionsNW1–Mensa(campusplan1C)Smallcanteendirectlyattheconferencesite.Smallselectionoflunchspecials.TheFizztogo(campusplan1C)Smallstorewithcaféclosetotheconferencesite.Day-to-daylunchspecials.CafeteriaGW2(campusplan2C)Canteenwithafriendlyatmosphereandlargewoodenfurniture.CaféUnique(campusplan2C)Restaurantofferinglunchspecialsatreasonableprices.Mensa(campusplan2B)Thelargestcanteenwithalargevarietyofdishesandanicesaladbar.CaféCentral(campusplan2B)Canteenofferingsmalldishes,snacks,coffee,sandwichesetc.Unikum(campusplan2C)Quitesmallandcosyrestaurantofferinglunchspecials.Notsuitableforlargergroups.RestaurantCampus(campusplan1A):restaurantintheATLANTICHotelUniversum.Varietyoflunchspecials.Alittlebitmoreexpensive.BioBiss(campusplan1B)Canteennotfarfromtheconferencesite.

31

32

Ko

gWis201

6:Spa

cefo

rCognitio

n-Program

Overview

Mon

26Sept

Tue27

Sep

tWed

28Sept

Thu29

Sep

tFri30Sept

09:00

ParallelSessio

nII

ParallelSessio

nIV

ParallelSessio

nVI

ParallelSessio

nVIII

S4:D

ynam

icso

fsketching...(S13

60)

O4:Embo

died

cognitio

n(H2)

S2:Spatia

lrep

resentation...(H1)

T3:W

orksho

pon

creativity

(S13

60)

O1:Language(H2)

O5:Spatia

lperception(H3)

S5:Socialperception(H2)

T4:Introdu

ctiontoACT

-R(H

1)

O2:Placere

cognition

&loc...(H3)

T1:D

etectin

gno

n-coop

er...(S13

60)

T5:B

ayesiandataanalysis(H

3)

11:00

Coffe

eBreak

Coffe

eBreak

Coffe

eBreak

Coffe

eBreak

11:30

KeynoteTalk(H

1):

KeynoteTalk(H

1):

KeynoteTalk(H

1):

ParallelSessio

nIX

TerryRe

gier

RuthCon

royDa

lton

FrancescaPazzaglia

T4:Introdu

ctiontoACT

-R(H

1)

S7:PRO

SOCR

ATES(S13

60)

12:30

Registratio

nLunchBreak

LunchBreak

LunchBreak

LunchBreak

14:00

ParallelSessio

nI

ParallelSessio

nIII

ParallelSessio

nV

ParallelSessio

nVII

ParallelSessio

nX

S1:Formal&cognitiv

ereason

ing(H2)

S4:D

ynam

icso

fsketching...(S13

60)

O6:Com

putatio

nalm

odeling(H2)

S6:M

entalfilesincogn.scien

ce(H

1)S7:PRO

SOCR

ATES(S13

60)

S3:C

ognitio

n&m

anualaction(H3)

O3:Categoriza

tion&sp

atial...(H2

)O7:Predictiveprocessin

g(H3)

T1:D

etectin

gno

n-coop

er...(S13

60)

T4:Introdu

ctiontoACT

-R(H

1)

15:00

DoctoralSym

posiu

mT2:Kanta

ndcognitiv

escience(H2)

T5:B

ayesiandataanalysis(H

3)

(H1)

16:00

Coffe

eBreak

Coffe

eBreak

Coffe

eBreak

Coffe

eBreak

Coffe

eBreak

16:30

KeynoteTalk(H

1):

KeynoteTalk(H

1):

DoctoralSym

posiu

mPresiden

tialLecture(H

1)en

dof

17:00

JimDavies

Thom

asM

etzin

ger

(H1)

BestPaperTalk(H1)

conferen

ce17:30

WelcomeRe

ception

PosterTeasers(H

1)18:00

PosterSessio

nGK

SocietyM

eetin

g(H1)

19:30

SocialDinne

r@"K

affeeMüh

le"