korea university user interface lab copyright 2008 by user interface lab 11 15 automaticity,...

17
Korea University User Interf ace Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical Implications Dept. of Industrial Systems & Information Engineering Korea University Copyright 2008 by User Interface L Cha Yeon Joo

Upload: darrell-patrick

Post on 18-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115

Automaticity, Resources, and Memory :

Theoretical Controversies and Practical ImplicationsDept. of Industrial Systems & Information Engineering

Korea University

Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab

Cha Yeon Joo

Page 2: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115Contents

• Introduction

• Facts about automaticity

• Theoretical Approaches to Automaticity

• Implication of Automaticity-as-memory

• Summary and Conclusions

1

Page 3: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115Introduction

• Two factions –Automaticity as a way to overcome resource limitation (old guard)–Memory phenomenon (revolutionary)

• Automaticity is a major factor in skill acquisition

• Memory view training

2

Page 4: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115Facts about Automaticity

• Automaticity processing’s properties– Fast– Effortless– Autonomous of obligatory– Consistent of stereotypic– Unavailable to conscious awareness

3

Page 5: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115Theoretical Approaches to Automaticity

Thesis : automaticity and resources• Modal view

– Automatic processing : without attention, require no capacity

• Questions1.Why automatic processing has the properties it does

- Fast, effortless, autonomous or obligatory, unconscious

2.How automaticity is learned- Not explain the development of automaticity- Practice ↑ demand for attention ↓- Serious weakness of modal view

4

Page 6: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115Theoretical Approaches to Automaticity

Thesis : automaticity and resources

5

3. How the properties of automaticity emerged with practice- Properties : characteristic of processes that require little or no

capacity- Practice↑ capacity ↓ properties emerged

4. Why consistency of practice is so important - Modal view has difficulty dealing with this questions- Process-based learning

Page 7: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115Theoretical Approaches to Automaticity

Antithesis : automaticity and memory• Revolutionary view ‑ Automaticity is a memory phenomenon‑ Single step, direct-access retrieval from memory‑ Automatization build-up of information in memory‑ Resources play no role in automatization

novice performance is limited by a lack of knowledge rather than

by a lack of resources‑ Automaticity associated with expertise

6

Page 8: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115Theoretical Approaches to Automaticity

Antithesis : automaticity and memory• Questions

1.Why automatic processing has the properties it does• Those properties are characteristic of memory retrieval

2.How automaticity is learned• Strengthening • Table look-up• Instance learning

3.How the properties of automaticity emerged with practice• Practice ↑ memory retrieval ↑

4.Why consistency of practice is so important • Item-based learning

7

Page 9: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115Theoretical Approaches to Automaticity

Synthesis : points of compatibility and compromise• It is hard to say whether automaticity-as-memory will entirely replace the modal view

• Integrate two theories - possible

‑ Resource theory is strong on explaining novice performance and weak on learning‑ Automaticity as memory is the opposite

• Logan’s memory instance theory‑ Resource reduction : consequence of automatization rather than a cause‑ Automatization could involve few resources compared‑ Automatization is consequence of experience‑ Attention to an object

‑ Encode to memory‑ Retrieve whatever was associated

8

Page 10: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115Implication of Automaticity-as-memory• Memory view can no longer be ignored

• Prediction (transfer of automaticity) ‑Modal view : predict broader transfer‑Memory view : predict narrower transfer

• Predictions design of training programs

• Levels of processing ‑ Modal view : Deeper levels demanding more resources‑ Memory view : with better memory for deeper processing

Better memory facilitate automatization

9

Page 11: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115

• Context can have powerful effects on memory

• Match between context at encoding and context at retrieval was the crucial variable

Context is an important retrieval cue

• The consistency of the context is also an important consideration

• In memory view ‐ Context effect automaticity, automatization

Implication of Automaticity-as-memory

- Context effects

10

Page 12: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115

• Training does not appear to produce immunity to dual-task interference

•Training programs should encourage trainees to treat the two tasks separately• Training under a variety of dual-task conditions

To ignore the context

Implication of Automaticity-as-memory

- Dual-Task Conditions as Context

11

Page 13: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115Implication of Automaticity-as-memory

- Levels-of-Processing Effects• Levels of processing is a potent variable in memory research

• Memory phenomenon‐ Levels of processing might have effect on automatization‐ Deeper level : faster learning and better retention

• Training may be more effective if it involves a deeper level of processing

• Not understood theoretically

12

Page 14: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115Implication of Automaticity-as-memory

- Implicit and Explicit Memory• Explicit memory task

‐ Recognition and recall ‐ Explicitly told to retrieve something from memory

• Implicit memory task‐ Performs better on familiar materials‐ No explicit instruction

• Not mutually exclusive

13

Page 15: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115Implication of Automaticity-as-memory - Procedural and Declarative Knowledge : Automaticity as Motor Skill• Declarative knowledge

- Knowledge of facts : knowing that

• Procedural knowledge- Knowledge of process : knowing how

• Skill acquisition- Transition : declarative knowledge procedural knowledge

• Perceptual-motor skills- Both automatic and procedural

14

Page 16: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115Summary and Conclusions

• Resource theories of automaticity

• Memory view provides a new perspective on issues in automaticity and training

15

Page 17: Korea University User Interface Lab Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab 11 15 Automaticity, Resources, and Memory : Theoretical Controversies and Practical

Korea University

User Interface Lab

Cop

yrig

ht 2

00

8 b

y U

ser

Inte

rfa

ce L

ab

1115

Copyright 2008 by User Interface Lab

Thank You