kurdish nationalism in northern iraq_ravenel godbold

41
The Development of Kurdish Nationalism in Modern Iraq: Is an Independent Kurdistan on the Horizon? By: Ravenel Godbold Introduction The establishment of an autonomous Kurdistan in northern Iraq in 1991 appeared to be a step in the right direction for the Iraqi Kurds. Within the span of a century, the Iraqi Kurds have evolved from an Ottoman minority group without nationalist goals to controlling an autonomous region with significant political power in the Iraqi state. Since the 2003 overthrow of Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi Kurds have made efforts to remain a part of the Iraqi state as long as their demands are met, but the question of an independent Iraqi Kurdistan has not been removed from the table. The following pages will address the feasibility of an independent Kurdish state beginning with the development of Kurdish nationalist sentiment and participation in the Iraqi political arena. The sections that follow explore the Iraqi Kurds and whether the limited autonomy they enjoy is indicative of a future, successful secession from the Iraqi state or is better used as an effective bargaining chip. The Kurds and Kurdistan Kurdayeti, or Kurd, was first used in the 12th century to describe nomadic groups residing in the mountainous regions of Iraq and Iran but over time has

Upload: ravenel-godbold

Post on 25-Jan-2017

12 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

TheDevelopmentofKurdishNationalisminModernIraq:IsanIndependentKurdistanonthe

Horizon?

By:RavenelGodbold

Introduction

TheestablishmentofanautonomousKurdistaninnorthernIraqin1991

appearedtobeastepintherightdirectionfortheIraqiKurds.Withinthespanofa

century,theIraqiKurdshaveevolvedfromanOttomanminoritygroupwithout

nationalistgoalstocontrollinganautonomousregionwithsignificantpolitical

powerintheIraqistate.Sincethe2003overthrowofSaddamHussein,theIraqi

KurdshavemadeeffortstoremainapartoftheIraqistateaslongastheirdemands

aremet,butthequestionofanindependentIraqiKurdistanhasnotbeenremoved

fromthetable.Thefollowingpageswilladdressthefeasibilityofanindependent

KurdishstatebeginningwiththedevelopmentofKurdishnationalistsentimentand

participationintheIraqipoliticalarena.ThesectionsthatfollowexploretheIraqi

Kurdsandwhetherthelimitedautonomytheyenjoyisindicativeofafuture,

successfulsecessionfromtheIraqistateorisbetterusedasaneffectivebargaining

chip.

TheKurdsandKurdistan

Kurdayeti,orKurd,wasfirstusedinthe12thcenturytodescribenomadic

groupsresidinginthemountainousregionsofIraqandIranbutovertimehas

Page 2: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

2

evolvedintoatermforidentifyingthefourthlargestethnicgrouporiginatingin

present-dayIraq,Iran,Syria,andTurkey.1TheIraqiKurdscomprise25%ofIraq’s

population,anestimated4.7millionpeople,makingthemthelargestminority

percentageofthehoststates.2Todaythereareanestimated20-30millionKurds,

withthemostsizeablecommunitiesintheUnitedStates,Germany,Russia,Israel,

Georgia,andCanada.3

TheKurdsutilizeseveralmythsoforigin,4butarelikelyaresultofIndo-

EuropeantribemigrationintotheZagrosregion.5Similartootherethnicgroups,the

KurdsarenotahomogeneouspeopleandwithintheKurdishcommunitythereare

linguistic,religious,andtribaldifferences.6Thereareanumberofdifferentdialects

withintheKurdishlanguage,influencedbytheofficiallanguagesofthecountriesin

whichtheyreside;themostwidelyspokendialectisKurmanjiandisusedbyKurds

inTurkey,Syria,northernIran,andtheportionofIraqnorthoftheGreaterZab

River,whileSorani/KurdiisspokensouthoftheGreaterZabinIraqandinthe

KordestanprovinceofIran.7ReligiouslytheKurdsarelessdiverse;themajorityof

KurdsareSunniMuslimsfollowingtheShafi’ischoolofjurisprudencealthough

thereareminoritiesfollowingSufism,Judaism,Christianity,Yarsanism,Yazidism,

1CraigDouglasAlbert,“AHistoryofViolence:EthnicGroupIdentityandtheIraqiKurds,”IranandtheCaucasus17(2013):223.22KeremYildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,(London:PlutoPress,2012)7.3JeremyJimenezandPeterKabachnik,“TheOtherIraq:ExploringIraqiKurdistan,”FOCUSonGeography55.2(Summer2012):31.4ThemajorityoftheKurds,accordingtoCraigDouglasAlbert,believetheyaredescendantsoftheMedianEmpirein6thcenturyPersia.Albert,224.5Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,5.6Albert,223.7Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,5.

Page 3: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

3

andShi’ism.8Finally,therearetribaldifferencesbetweentheKurds.These

differenceswillbediscussedwhensummarizingthedevelopmentofKurdish

politicalparties.

ThemajorityofKurdsresideinIraq,Iran,Syria,andTurkey,aregion

referredtoasKurdistanbeginninginthe16thcentury.9Theregionwasruledbythe

OttomanandPersianempiresuntiltheearly20thcenturywhentheMiddleEastwas

divviedupintothepresentdaystates.Theareareceivesanadequateamountof

rainfall,creatingasuitableenvironmentforagriculture(primarilytobacco,cotton,

grains,fruits,andvegetables)andlivestockfarming,while10IraqiKurdistanisalso

richinoil,naturalgas,minerals(chrome,copper,iron,coal,lignite),andwater.11All

fourcountrieshavehadconflictswiththeKurdishpopulationsresidingwithintheir

borders,butthoseinIraqaretheonlyoneswhohavemanagedtoachieveautonomy

andhavetheirbordersrecognizedbybothdomesticandforeignentities.

DevelopingaNationalIdentity

TheOttomanEmpireandBritishControl

KurdslivingintheOttomanvilayetsofMosul,Baghdad,andBasradidnot

developastrongsenseofnationalidentityuntilthepost-WorldWarIperiod.While,

theOttomanPeriodwasnotabsentofKurdishdiscontent,12theOttomanshad

successfullyreducedthepowersofKurdishAmirswithoutfacingmuchopposition,

8Ibid,6andAlbert,227.9SeeAppendixA.10TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,7.11Ibid.TheeffectsofthesenaturalresourcesonthepoliticalsituationinIraqiKurdistanwillbediscussedmoreindepthinthefollowingpages.12SeeDavidMcDowall’sAModernHistoryoftheKurdsforanindepthhistoryofKurdishshaykhs,uprisings,andthreatstotheOttomanEmpire.

Page 4: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

4

largelyduetotheuseofreligionasthemarkerofidentity;asMuslims,themajority

ofKurdswasstillanintegralpartoftheOttomansystemanddidnotfeeltheir

positionwasthreatenedbythepowerreductions.13WiththeoutbreakofWorldWar

I,theKurdsralliedaroundtheOttomanEmpirewhenitdeclaredwaronBritain,

France,andRussiain1914.14Unfortunately,fortheOttomans,theKurdishsupport

wasshortlivedandnationalistideasbegantodevelop;EdmundGhareebattributes

thebeginningsofKurdishnationalismtoanumberoffactorsincluding:poorsocial

andeconomicconditionsinKurdishareas,closertiesbetweenKurdishtribes,the

lackofinterestoftheYoungTurkmovementinminorities,andtheriseofstrong

nationalistmovementsinotherOttomansubjects(Greeks,Arabs,Armenians,

Bulgarians,andAlbanians).15

FollowingthecollapseoftheOttomanEmpire,itappearedaKurdishstate

wasonthehorizon.SignedonAugust10,1920bytheOttomanGovernmentand

AlliedPowers,theTreatyofSevresessentiallyredrewthemapoftheMiddleEast,

createdthenewstatesofTurkeyandIraq,anddissolvedtheOttomanEmpire.The

questionof“Kurdistan”wasalsoaddressed,16andthediscussioncontinuedatthe

1921CairoConferencewhendelegatesagreedaKurdishstateshouldactasabuffer

betweentheotherMiddleEasternstates.Duetounhappinesswithlanddivisions,

13PeterSluglett,“CommonSense,oraStepPregnantwithEnormousConsequences:SomeThoughtsonthePossibleSecessionofIraqiKurdistan,”SecessionasanInternationalPhenomenon:FromAmerica’sCivilWartoContemporarySeparatistMovements,Ed.DonHarrisonDoyle,(Athens:UniversityofGeorgia,2010)322.14Sluglett,323.15EdmundGhareeb,“TheKurdishIssue,”Iraq:ItsHistory,People,andPolitics,Ed.ShamiConstantineInati,(Amherst,NY:Humanity,2003)167.16MahirA.Aziz,TheKurdsofIraq:EthnonationalismandNationalIdentityinIraqKurdistan,(London:I.B.Tauris,2011)61.

Page 5: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

5

theTreatyofSevreswasrejectedJuly24,1923andreplacedwiththeTreatyof

Lausanne,establishingthemodernTurkishstateandrejectedtheideaof

“Kurdistan”;theregionwasdividedbetweenIraq(Mosulwasincorporatedintothe

state),Turkey,Syria,andIranonJune5,1926,creatingthebordersandpopulations

ofthemodernMiddleEast.

Duringthissameperiod,Britishpolicyintheregionundertheircontrol

appearedsympathetictotheKurdishcauseandinsomewaysencouragedKurdish

nationalism,toyingwiththeestablishmentofaKurdishprovince.17The1921

provisionalconstitutiondeclaredIraqtobecomprisedoftwonationalgroups,the

ArabsandtheKurds.After1925,theKurdsweregivenmorelenienciesandallowed

toteachKurdishinschools,publishKurdishlanguagebooks,andrepresentthe

Kurdishmajorityregioninthegovernment.18ThesmallsuccessesfortheKurds

wereshortlived,andthe1930Anglo-IraqTreatyofAlliancedidnothingtopromote

Kurdishautonomyorbasicrights.19Twoyearslater,Iraqofficiallygained

independencefromtheBritish,althoughBritishinfluencewouldremainuntilthe

1958Revolution,andwasgrantedmembershipintotheLeagueofNations

conditionalontheprotectionofcivilandpoliticalrightsoftheKurdishpopulation.20

The1930sbegantheprocessofmajortransformationsintheformofrevolts,

developmentofArabnationalism,andpoliticalpartyformationintheIraqipolitical

sphere.ThemostnotablepartyestablishedinthisdecadewastheIraqiCommunist

Party(ICP)in1934,whichinitiallyattractedthesupportofurbanKurdsduetotheir17Aziz,60.18Aziz,68.19Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,11.20Ibid.

Page 6: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

6

supportforminoritygroups,butthedevelopmentofKurdishpartiesbeginningin

the1940sledtoashiftinpoliticalalliances.21In1935MustafaBarzanibecamea

prominentfigureinKurdishnationalism,leadingarevoltofKurdishchiefsagainst

thegovernment’sfailuretoupholdthetermsofthedeclarationofindependence,

mostnotablytheofficialuseoftheKurdishlanguage,representationofKurdsinthe

NationalAssembly,andafairdivisionofresources.22Eventhoughtherevolt

ultimatelyfailed,MullaMustafa’sparticipationputhimandtheBarzanitribeonthe

politicalmap.

CentralIraqalsounderwentanumberofchangesduringthe1930s;Britain

refusedtorelinquishcontroloftheareaandafterthedeathsofKingFaysalIand

Ghazi,andtheweakruleofKingFaysalII,thefutureofIraqwasagaininquestion.23

Severalsucceedingcabinetswereunabletoeffectivelygovernduetofactionalism,

sectarianism,andgeneralincompetenceofpoliticalleadersinoffice.24

The1930salsosawtwodistinctformsofnationalismbegintodevelop

amongArabIraqis:qawmiyyah,anethnic,racialnationalism,andwataniyyah,a

territorialnationalism.Qawmiyyah,anethnicandracialnationalism,stemsfrom

qawm,whichhastakenontheEuropeanconnotationof“nation”althoughit

originallyreferredtobloodrelation,whilewataniyyah,aterritorialnationalism,

comesfromwatana,or“homeland”.25Iraqissubscribingtotheqawmiyyahtheory

21Aziz,66.22Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,12.23DeniseNatali,TheKurdsandtheState:EvolvingNationalIdentityinIraq,Turkey,andIran,(Syracuse,NY:SyracuseUP,2005)35.24DavidMcDowall,AModernHistoryoftheKurds,(London:I.B.Tauris,1996)287.25JohanFranzen,“TheProblemofIraqiNationalism,”NationalIdentities13.3(2011):220.

Page 7: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

7

tendedtosupportPan-Arabism,astrainofnationalismthatalsodevelopedduring

the1930s,whileproponentsofwataniyyasupportedIraqipatriotism.26Perhaps

unsurprisinglymanyoftheBa’athists(IraqiRenaissanceSocialistParty)werealso

qawmiyyanationalists,supportinganArabIraqistateandclaimingsuchastatewas

theonlywaytoachieveunityovertheminorities.27Theimportanceofqawmiyyah

andtheBa’athpartywillcomeintoplayfollowingthe1968Ba’athRevolution.

TheBritish,Qasim,andtheFirstBa’athCoup

WithmuchofthewesternworldfocusedontheoutbreakofWorldWarII,

IraqfacedanewleaderastheresultofyetanothercouponApril3,1941,RashidAli

elGailani.28AlireachedouttotheAxispowersforsupport,promptingBritish

militaryinterventioninBasra,Baghdad,andHabbaniyawheretheymanagedto

defeatAli’smilitaryandsecuretheirholdonoilinterests.29Despitesuccessover

Ali’smilitarycoup,theBritishwerethenforcedtocontendwithaKurdishrevolt

from1943-1945undertheleadershipofMullaMustafaBarzani.Britishpressureon

BaghdadsecuredapardonforMullaMustafainNovember1943andattemptsto

negotiatebetweenMullaMustafaandBaghdadbegan.Negotiationsappearedto

succeed,butArabnationalistsrefusedtoimplementthechangesandMullaMustafa

begantestingthelimitswithnewfoundconfidencefromsupportinthenorth,

resultinginastalemate.30

26Natali,35.27Ibid.28KellyBell,“WorldWarII:AirWaroverIraq,”AviationHistoryMagazine,May2004,Available:http://www.historynet.com/world-war-ii-air-war-over-iraq.htm.29Ibid.30McDowall,291.

Page 8: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

8

Thestalematecontinuedthroughthesummerof1944whenMullaMustafa

againrejectedamnestyfromBaghdadandIraqitroopsmarchedonMullaMustafa,

forcinghimonthedefensiveandcausinghimtofleetoMahabadprovinceinIran.31

WhileinMahabad,MullaMustafaparticipatedinthenationalistmovementand

defendedthefirstKurdishRepublicbeforeretreatingtotheSovietUnionin1947,

whereheresidedfor11yearsbeforereturningtoIraqonOctober6,1958.32

In1946,fourpoliticalgroupsunitedtoestablishoftheKurdishDemocratic

Party(KDP):Heva,Shoresh,Rizgari(Liberation),andtheIraqibranchoftheIranian

KDP.33TheKDPessentiallyrepresentedtheBarzanis,aKurmanjispeakingtribe

locatedinthenorthwestregionofIraqiKurdistan,andtosomeextent,thisremains

trueinthecurrentpartycomposition.34MullaMustafawaselected

president/chairman,HamzaAbdullahwasnamedsecretary-general,andShaikh

LatifandShaikhZiadAghazwerechosenasvicepresidents.35DuetoMulla

Mustafa’sexilesinIranandtheSovietUnion,theKDPplayedaminorroleinIraqi

politics.IbrahimAhmad,aKurdishnationalist,replacedAbdullahassecretary

generalin1953,hopingtocombineKurdishnationalismwithleftistnationalist

movements.36Abdullahregainedcontrolbrieflyin1959,buthisclosetieswiththe

ICPconcernedMullaMustafaandAhmadtookbackthepositionlaterthatyear.

ThesecompetinginterestswithintheKDPledtofactionalismandlaterthecreation

31McDowall,293.32Aziz,68.33MichaelM.Gunter,TheKurdsofIraq:TragedyandHope,(NewYork:St.Martin's,1992)22.34Sluglett,332.35Ibid.36Gunter,23.

Page 9: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

9

ofnewparties,butforthenextdecadetheKDPremainedtheprimaryKurdishparty

inIraq.

Duringthisperiod,Britishpoliciesremainedineffect,anditwasnotuntilthe

July1958RevolutionthatBritishinfluencewasexpelledandanewpoliticalclass

emerged.AbdulKarimQasim,leaderoftheFreeOfficer’sMovement,cametopower

asnationalistmilitaryofficersandanewclassofintelligentsiawasthrustintothe

centerofBaghdadipolitics.37Qasimsupportedthewataniyyahstrandof

nationalism,pushingforaunifiedIraqstatewithArab-Kurdishsolidarity.38TheJuly

27,1958provisionalconstitutioncontainedcontradictoryarticles;ArticleThree

namedtheKurdsasanintegralpartoftheIraqistatewithguaranteedrightswhile

ArticleTwodeclaredIraqtobepartofanArabnation.39

InitiallyKurdswereallowedtobroadcast,publish,andeducateinKurdish,

theKurdishethnicidentitywasrecognized,40andaKurdwasappointedtothe

“sovereigntycouncil”.41QasimalsoattemptedtoallywithIraqicommunists,andin

1959theKurdishandcommunistalliessuppressedanti-QasimrevoltsinMosuland

Kirkuk.Unsurprisingly,Qasim’sallianceswithboththeKurdsandthecommunists

wereshort-lived;by1960,anyconcessionsgrantedduringthefirsttwoyearsofthe

governmentwerewithdrawnoutoffearthattheKurdswoulddemand

independence.KDPmemberssentdemandsregardingcultural,national,and

economicrecognitiontoBaghdadandweremetwithattacksbyQasimthrough

37Frazen,226.38Aziz,69.39Aziz,68.40Aziz,69.41Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,13.

Page 10: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

10

enemiesoftheBarzanitribe.42TheKurdsansweredwitharevolt(March1961-

1963),withthegoalofobtainingautonomyandadvancingthesocialagenda.43

Duringthisperiod,therewerealsodebateswithintheKDP,mostnotablyJalal

Talabaniandhisfollowers,foreshadowingtheinevitablesplitwithintheKDPinthe

nextdecade.

OnFebruary8,1963,theBa’athPartysucceededinitsfirstrevolution,

overthrowingQasimandestablishinganewgovernment.Theirsuccesswasbrief,as

AbdelSalamArifoverthrewthepartyninemonthslaterandgovernedIraquntil

1966.UnderArif,theKurdswereunabletomakeprogressregardingtheirdemands

forautonomy;however,followingArif’sdeathin1966,hisbrother,Al-Bazzazzdrew

uptheJune1966Accord,alsoreferredtoastheAl-BazzazzDeclaration.The

declarationoutlined15pointsregardingtheKurdishdemandforautonomyand

nationalrecognitionfortheirrights,butNasserites,Ba’athists,andCommunists

crushedwhatwouldhavebeenapositivestepfortheKurds.44Twoyearslater,the

Ba’athPartyregainedpowerinthe1968bloodlesscoupandpowerdynamics

changedyetagain.

TheBa’athistsandtheKurds:InternalDiscord,Arabization,andAnfal

ThesecondBa’athcouptookplacefromJuly17-30,1968andbytheendof

thetwo-weekperiodGeneralAhmadHasanal-Bakr,arelativeofSaddamHussein’s

fromTikrit,tookpower.Shortlyafter,aKurdishrevolteruptedandtheBa’athparty,

havingfailedtocrushtherevolt,begannegotiationswiththeKurds.Theresultwas

42Aziz,70.43McDowall,313.44Aziz,71.

Page 11: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

11

theMarch11,1970Agreement,offeredbytheRevolutionaryCommandCouncil

(RCC),whichdetailed13articlesgrantingKurdsasignificantamountofautonomy

whilekeepingtheregionpartoftheIraqistate.45Thearticlesincludedfull

recognitionoftheKurdishnationality,centralgovernmentpositionsforKurdish

politicians,autonomywithinfouryears,integrationofthepeshmergaintotheIraqi

army,andacensusandplebiscitetodeterminethestatusofKirkuk.Thissuccess,

likepreviousones,wassuperficialandfailedtoliveuptotheexpectations

promised;the1970agreementexperiencedpartialimplementationandby1974,

thenegotiationsculminatedinadeadlock.

The1970sprovedtobeadifficultdecadefortheKurds.The1974Autonomy

Law,theAlgiersAgreement,changesingovernmentpolicy,andinternalstrifedealt

Kurdishnationalismhardblows.TheAutonomyLaw,offeredtoBarzanibySaddam

Hussein,grantedtheKurdssignificantauthorityoverthesocialandeconomic

aspectsofwhatwouldbeaself-governingregion.Therewerecaveats,andBarzani

refusedtosignduetothelegallimitationsforautonomyandsignificantdecreasein

landarea.46Ayearlater,theAlgiersAgreementwassignedonMarch6,1975

betweenIraqandIran,resultinginthewithdrawalofIraniansupportfortheKurds.

OnMarch23,1975,BarzaniannounceddefeatandfledtoIranwithanestimated

100,000Kurds,leavingtheKDPinhisson’shands.

FollowingBarzani’sself-imposedexileinIran,JalalTalabaniandother

disgruntledKDPmembersbrokeawaytoformthePatrioticUnionofKurdistan

(PUK)party.ThemajorityofPUKmembersheraldedfromtheSurani-speaking45Aziz,72.46Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,19-20.

Page 12: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

12

northeastregionofIraqiKurdistan,preferredamoreprogressivepolitical

approach,andhadopposedtheclosetiesbetweentheKDPandtheUnitedStates

duringthe1963Ba’athreign.47UnliketheKDP,thePUKwaslesstribalorientedbut

theTalabanitribe,oneofthelargestinIraqiKurdistan,wasimportantinensuring

loyaltytotheparty.48Splinterparties(KDP-PL,PASOK,KSPI,andKPDP)49also

formedduringthelate1970s,andinter-Kurdishskirmishesbecamecommonplace.

Inadditiontoexternalenemies,theKurdswerefightingamongstthemselves.

Duringthissameperiod,theBa’athpartyintroducedanewideologyto

replaceQasim’snationalistideology.NationalisminIraqshiftedfromwataniyyahto

qawmiyyah;Ba’athistsaimedtomakeIraqthecenteroftheArabworldand

Saddam’svisionoftheidealIraqiidentitywasbasedonSunniMuslim

characteristics.InordertoforcetheassimilationofIraqi’smultipleminoritygroups,

SaddamimplementedtheprocessofArabization.Inordertoalterthedemography,

tensofthousandsofIraqiArabswereresettledinKurdishareaswiththeguarantee

ofhousingandjobs.50Kurdishvillagesweredestroyedorrenamed,theKurdish

languagewasforbiddeninschools,andnationalandculturalKurdishactivitieswere

banned.51

TheArabizationprocesscontinuedaftertheoutbreakoftheIran-IraqWar

(1980-1988),andSaddamusedthisexternalthreattoinstigateadditionalviolence47Sluglett,333.48AnilHiraandKawaJabary,“TheKurdishMirage:ASuccessStoryinDoubt,”MiddleEastPolicy20.2(2013):100.49Aziz,76.50NouriTalabani,“EthnicCleansinginIraqiKurdistan,”KurdishIdentity:HumanRightsandPoliticalStatus.Ed.CharlesG.MacDonaldandCaroleO’Leary.(Gainesville:UniversityPressofFlorida,2007)145.51Aziz,75.

Page 13: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

13

againsttheKurds.SomegroupsannouncedtheirsupportforIran52whileothers

sidedwithSaddaminexchangeforfinancialcompensation.53Itwasnotuntil1988

thatthePUKandKDPcametogether,alongwiththeKPDP,KSP,PASOK,ICP,KTP,

andADM,toformtheIraqiKurdistanFrontwiththegoaloftherightofself-

determinationanddemocracyforIraq.54Oneofthemaincatalystswasmostlikely

theAnfalcampaign,spearheadedbyAliHassanal-Majid,alsoknownas“Chemical

Ali”andthecousinofSaddam.AstheheadoftheIraqiStateSecurityServicesand

thechiefoftheBa’athParty’sBureauforNorthernAffairs,Alilaunchedmilitary

offensesagainstcivilianandmilitarytargetswithchemicalweapons;55theattacks

occurredinthreewaves,beginningwithBergalouandSergalou,followedby

Sewsenan,andconcludingwithvillagesontheGermianplane.56TheAnfal

campaignsdestroyedanestimated3,000villages,displaced1.5millionpeople,and

killed180,000.57Thosewhosurvivedtheattacksfaceddetainmentincamps.

Medicalstudiesshowedthephysiologicaleffectsofchemicalweaponslastedfor

yearsaftertheinitialattack.58ThewarendedafternearlyadecadeinAugust1988,

andamnestywasgrantedonSeptember6,1988.

52Albert,218.53Albert,231.54Aziz,79.55ResearchconductedbyDr.ChristineGodsdenofLiverpoolontheHalabjaattackrevealedtheuseofchemicalsincludedmustardgas,Saringas,Tabun,andVX(nerveagents).SeeYildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,27.56Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,22-25.TheattackatHalabjawasnotpartoftheAnfalcampaignbutwasthemostdevastatingintermsofdamages57Ibid.58Effectsincludedrespiratoryproblems,eyedisorders,skindiseases,cancers,congenitalabnormalities,infertility,miscarriages,stillbirths,andneonatal/infantdeath.SeeYildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,28.

Page 14: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

14

Intifada,InternationalIntervention,andSemi-AutonomousRule:1991-200359

March1991Rebellion

The1990smarkedaturningpointfortheKurdsintheirstruggleagainstthe

centralIraqigovernment,butinternalconflictcontinuedtodividetheKurdish

parties.Iraq’sinvasionofKuwaitonAugust2,1990setthingsinmotionandon

March5,1991aspontaneousuprising,raparininKurdish,beganinIraqiKurdistan.

BeginninginRanya,theuprisingspreadtoErbil,Sulaimaniya,Dohuk,andZakho60

followingtheceasefiresignedbetweenIraqandNATOtroops.61Despiteclaimsof

U.S.andalliedincitement,theU.S.didnotsupporttherebellionforfearofaShi’ite

revolutioninthesouth,vestedinterestedinSaddam’sregime,andinorderto

preserveIraq’sterritorialintegrity.62Thepeshmergawasinundatedwithtroops63

andconfidence,attackingandoverthrowingmilitarybases,securityheadquarters,

andBa’athpartyoffices.64Saddam’sforceseasilysuppressedtherebellion,leading

totheexodusof2millionKurdstoTurkey(~500,000)andIran(~1.5million),the

detainmentof~100,000,andthedeathof~20,000.65TheKurdswhofledtoIran

wereaccepted,butthoseontheTurkishborderwerelessfortunateandmanydied

whilewaitingforrefuge.InKirkukanestimated30,000Kurdswerearrestedand59SeeAppendixB.60Aziz,82.61Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,29.62Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,31.63Anestimated50,000+troopsarethoughttohavedesertedtheIraqiarmyinthenorth.SeeYildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,30.64Aziz,82.65Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,31.

Page 15: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

15

detainedwithoutfoodorwaterfordays,hundredsofhomeswererazed,andthose

whosurvivedwereforbiddenfromreturning.66

TheUnitedNationswastedlittletimeincondemningSaddam’sresponseto

theuprising;inameetingheldonApril5,1991,theUNSecurityCouncilissued

Resolution688despiteaformalprotestfromIraq,abstentionsfromChinaand

India,andvotesagainsttheresolutionbyCuba,Yemen,andZimbabwe.67The

controversialresolutioncondemnedIraq’srepressivetacticsanddemandedIraq

endtherepressionimmediately,aswellasallowaccesstohumanitarianaid

organizations.CoupledwiththeeconomicembargoplacedonIraqioilshortlyafter

invadingKuwait,Baghdadwasdispleasedwithinternationalintervention.OnApril

13,1991theGulfWarallieslaunchedOperationProvideComforttoprovide

humanitarianrelieffortheIraqiKurdishregion;theoperationeventuallysupplied

15,500tonsofsuppliesby20,000personnelfrom13countries.68

OperationSafeHavencommencedshortlyafteronApril16,1991inorderto

establishrefugeecampsforKurdsbetweentheTurkishandIranianborders;camps

beganatZakhoandeventuallyspreadeasttoAmadiyyaandsouthtoDohuk.69The

ideaof“Kurdishenclaves”,later“safehavens”,wasinitiallyproposedbyTurkish

PresidentOzalandadvocatedforbyBritishPrimeMinisterJohnMajor;theUnited

StatesandUNreversedtheirearlierpositionsandsupportedthesafehaven

system.70Alliedforcesestablisheda36-mileby36-mileno-flyzoneabovethe36th

66Talabani,146.67Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,33.68Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,34.69Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,35.70Gunter,56.

Page 16: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

16

parallel,includingErbil,Mosul,Zakho,andDohuk,andKurdishrefugeesbeganto

returntotheirhomeswithinthezone.ByMay23,1991theUNannouncedan

agreementtostationamaximumof500UNguardsinfourprovinces,andonJune7,

1991theUNHCRtookoverthehumanitarianreliefeffortsinitiallyheadedbythe

UnitedStates.71

FoundingandFighting:TheEmergenceoftheKRG

Whileinternationalbodiesorganizedpreliminaryhumanitarianreliefefforts,

KurdishleadersbegannegotiationswiththeIraqigovernmentinApril1991;the

negotiationswentthroughtworounds,withonlyfourofthesevenIKFpartiesin

attendance(Talabaniattendingthefirstround(April18-24)andMassoudBarzani

attendingthesecond(May6-18)).72InJuneBarzanireturnedtotheKurdishregion

withclaimsofanautonomydealbasedontheconstitutionandtheMarch1970

Agreement,butinreturn,SaddamrequiredtheKurdscommittoanappendixtitled

“KurdistanFrontsCommitmentsTowardtheHomeland”,whichdetailedthe

disbandmentofthepeshmerga,surrenderofradiostations,immediateendoftalks

withinternationalbodies,commitmenttotheIraqistate,supportoftheBa’athparty

indealingwithnationalisticgroups,andtheimplementationofprogramsdrawnup

bythecentralgovernment.73TheIKFrespondedwithacounterproposalthatwas

notacceptedandinfall1991,thenegotiationsdisintegratedandclashesbrokeout

betweenKurdishandIraqiforces.

71Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:theIraqiDilemma,36.72Gunter,59.73Gunter,71.

Page 17: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

17

BylateOctober1991,Saddamwithdrewalltroops,cutthesalariesof

Kurdishemployees,andimposedablockadeontheKurdishregion.TheKurdish

FrontrecognizedSaddam’sattempttoforcetheKurdsintosubmissionand

respondedwiththeannouncementofparliamentaryelectionstoreplacethe

LegislativeAssembly,aswellasgivetheFrontsomesemblanceoforder,tobeheld

onApril3,1992.74Theelectionswereheldamonthlate,May19,1992,inthethree

provincestheKurdscontrolledonthebasisofproportionalrepresentationwith7%

ofthevoterequiredtoqualifyforaseat.75Smallerpartiesparticipated,including

Islamic,AssyrianTurkmen,andleftistgroups,andsomecombinedinattemptsto

gainmorevotes;however,theresultsshowedtheKDPandPUKhadthemostloyal

followingastheonlytwopartiestomeetthe7%requirement,andBarzaniand

Talabaniagreedtoleadthefronttogether,splittingtheseats50-50betweenthetwo

groups.76

TheNationalAssemblymetforthefirsttimeonJune4,1991andtheKurdish

RegionalGovernment(KRG)wasestablishedamonthlater;77theKRGdeclared

KurdistanafederalIraqistateonOctober4,1992despiteprotestsfromIraq,Iran,

Syria,andTurkey.78RatherthancompletelyleavingtheIraqistate,theKurdsmade

itcleartheywereopentoreturning“tothefold,butonlyifthecentralgovernment

mademajorchangesintheformerIraqiconstitution.”79

74McDowall,379.75McDowall,380.76Ghareeb,179.77McDowall,382.78Aziz,85.79MohammedM.A.Ahmed,IraqiKurdsandNation-Building,(NewYork:PalgraveMacmillan,2012)9.

Page 18: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

18

A“unified”KRGwasunabletowithstandthepressuresoftheindividual

parties,andin1994,acivilwareruptedbetweentheKDPandthePUK,duetoalack

oftrust,lackoftransparency,anddisputesoverbordertariffs.80Alanddisputenear

QalaDizabetweenaKDPclaimantandPUKsupportingfarmersinMay1994

sparkedtensionsandbattleswerefoughtbetweenthetwopartiesintermittently

untilAugust1994,andagaininDecember1994.81Despiteattemptstomediateby

theIraqiNationalCongress,82ironicallyapredominantlyAraboppositionparty,

tensionscontinuedtoescalate.Anotherattempttomediate,theDroghedapeace

talks,tookplacein1995inIreland.BothpartiesagreedtodemilitarizeErbil,the

turnoverofKDPcustomsrevenuestoajointbankaccount,reconveningtheKRG,

andreassuringoutsidepartiesoftheirdedicationtoIraq’sintegrityandTurkey’s

interests.83

Unfortunately,thetalksfailedin1996whentheKDPallieditselfwiththe

Ba’athpartyinanattempttoretakeErbilandSulaimaniyaandfightingensued.84

Laterthatyear,thetwopartiesestablishedtheirnewheadquarters,thePUKin

SulaimaniyaandtheKDPinErbil;85untilthedétentewassignedin1998,thetwo

partiesoperatedastwoseparateadministrativeunits,makingprogressdifficultbut

notimpossible.TheKRGexperiencedlimitedsuccessesduringthisperiod,including

the1992elections,rebuildingofvillages,economicandcivilsocietygrowthand

80Ahmed,9.81McDowall,386.82McDowall,387.83KeremYildiz,TheKurdsinIraq:ThePast,PresentandFuture,(London:PlutoPress,2004)49.84Ibid.85HiraandJabary,102.

Page 19: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

19

development,anddegreesofliberation,whichwillbediscussedinthefollowing

sectiondevotedtonon-governmentalandhumanitarianaidorganizations.86

Theceasefire,signedSeptember17,1998inWashingtonD.C.,stipulated

measuresforpowersharingbetweentheKDPandthePUK,andthetwogroups

coordinatedactivitiesbeginningin2000.87FollowingtheSeptember11,2001

attacksontheUnitedStates,theKurdsplayedanimportantroleinpreparationfor

theU.S.invasionin2003.TalabaniandBarzanirealizedthesurvivaloftheKRG

wouldbedependentontheU.S.afterSaddam’sfallandagreedtoassistinmilitary

andcounter-terrorismcapacitiesaslongastheirsafetywasguaranteed.88However,

itwasnotuntiltheconclusionoftheSecondGulfWarthattheKRGbegantoinvolve

itselfinBaghdad’spoliticalsphereandinfluencetheoutcomeofcentralgovernment

proceedings.

InternationalAidandRebuildingIraqiKurdistan:1992-2003

Theinternationalcommunityplayedamajorroleinthecreationofasemi-

autonomousKurdishstateinnorthernIraq,particularlyintheformoffinancialaid.

DeniseNatali,oneoftheforemostresearchersregardingtheKurdishquestionin

Iraq,Syria,Iran,andTurkey,dividedthedecadefrom1992-2003intotwoperiods:

NGODependency(1992-1996)andOilForFoodProgram(OFFP)(1996-2003).

FollowingtheFirstGulfWar,IraqiKurdistanexperiencedadoubleeconomic

embargobytheUNandthecentralIraqigovernment.TheUNembargoprevented86DavidRomano,“TheStruggleforAutonomyandDecentralization–IraqiKurdistan,”FromDesolationtoReconstruction:Iraq’sTroubledJourney,Ed.MokhtarLamaniandBessmaMomani,(Waterloo,Ontario:WilfridLaurierUniversityPress,2009)56-57.87Aziz,88.88Yildiz,TheKurdsinIraq:ThePast,PresentandFuture,103.

Page 20: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

20

thesaleofoil,limitedfoodavailability,prohibitedexternaltradeandencouraged

inflation,whiletheIraqiembargoreinforcedthefoodshortagethrougharationing

system.89Duringthisperiod,themajorityofKurdistan’srevenuederivedfrom

tariffsimposedontrafficcrossingthebordersfromSyria,Turkey,andIran.90

ThefocusoffinancialaidduringtheNGODependencyperiodwason

immediatereliefratherthanlong-termdevelopment;assistancewasprovidedinthe

formoffoodandfuelhandoutsonthebasisofsix-monthcontingencyplansrather

thanlong-termmacroeconomicreform.91SomeorganizationschosetoaidIraqi

Kurdistanexclusively,ratherthanIraqasawholebasedonBaghdad’stendencyto

micromanaging,92andthefundingpaidteachingsalaries,implementedschool

feedingprograms,reconstructedvillages,resettledinternallydisplacedpersons,

rebuiltaccessroads,andbegantherevivaloftheagriculturalsector.93

WhiletheaidprogramssucceededininitiatingtherebuildingofIraqi

Kurdistan,theyfailedtoprovidethegroundworkforsustainable,long-termprojects

tokeeptheregionafloat.TheKurdsswitchedtheirdependencyfromBaghdadtothe

NGOs;bythemid-1990s,70%ofthepopulationwasdependentoninternational

reliefandthemostskilledworkerswenttoworkforNGO’sorU.S.-ledprojects.94

Thelackofdevelopmentledto“corruption,thedisparityofwealth,internalconflict

betweentheKDPandPUKoverresources,andthestagnationofsocio-political

89DeniseNatali,“TheSpoilsofPeaceinIraqiKurdistan,”ThirdWorldQuarterly,28.6(2007)1112.90Yildiz,TheKurdsinIraq:Past,PresentandFuture,67.91Natali,1113-1114.92Yildiz,TheKurdsinIraq:ThePast,PresentandFuture,75.93Natali,1113.94Natali,1114.

Page 21: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

21

norms(lackofgrowthintheprivatesector,freetradedevelopment,andforeign

investment).”95

ThesecondphasedescribedbyNatali,theOilforFoodProgram(OFFP)

period,lastedfrom1996totheSecondGulfWar.TheOFFP,implementedbytheUN

underResolution986,passedbytheUNSecurityCouncil,shiftedthefocusfrom

relieftodevelopment,andallotted13%ofthetotalaidforIraqtobeusedinthe

north.TheUNOfficeoftheHumanitarianCoordinatorinIraq(UNOCHI)wastoact

onbehalfofthecentralgovernmentinordertoprocure,transport,anddeliveraid

toregion;theaidinitiallytotaled$29million,withanadditional$9.8billionin

interestoveroilsalefundsandcurrencyexchangegains.96Thefinancialaidwasto

bedistributedin13six-monthphases,butonly51%ofthefundswerereceived

duringtheperiod.97Evenwithoutthefullallotmentoffunding,Dohuk,Erbil,and

Sulaimaniyaexperiencedgrowthanddevelopment;factorieswerebuilt,theprivate

sectordeveloped,andfoodavailabilityandsocialconditionsimproved.98TheKRG

alsoexperiencedpositivegrowthduringtheOFFP;theUNincorporatedlocal

personnelintolegitimategoverningbodiesandessentiallygavelessonsingood

governingpolicies.99

Unfortunately,theOFFPperiodalsoperpetuatedthedependencyon

internationalinvestment.ImplementersoftheOFFPwantedtoavoidsteppingon

thetoesofBaghdadand,asaresult,didnotintroducemajoreconomicorsocial95Natali,1115-1116.96Natali,1116.97Ibid.Theremaining49%stayedinaFrenchbankforfiveyearswhileaccruinginteresttobenefitSaddam’sregime,theUN,andprivateinvestors.98Natali,1117.99Ibid.

Page 22: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

22

reforminIraqiKurdistan.Thetrialrunperiodforthesemi-autonomousregion

illuminatedtheglaringeconomic,social,andpoliticalissuesfacingtheKRGforthe

future.ItwasnotuntiltheSecondGulfWarandpost-warperiodthatthearea

experiencedthedevelopmentsandchangesrequiredforanautonomousregionand

certainlyanindependentstate.

TheKurdsinPost-SaddamIraq:2003-2011

PoliticalChange:KurdishIntegrationintoBaghdad’sPoliticalSphere

OnMay6,2003,shortlyaftertheinvasionofIraq,theUnitedStates

establishedtheCoalitionProvisionalAuthority(CPA)headedbyPaulBremer,with

thegoalofadministeringtheexecutiveaspectsofIraq’sgovernment.100TheCPA

wasapprovedbytheUN,whichinturnadoptedResolution1483toformally

authorizetheCPA’sactivities.TheResolutionacknowledgedthecreationoftheIraq

GoverningCouncil(IGC),anIraqigoverningbodythatwouldnottakeoverthe

dutiesoftheCPAuntil“aninternationallyrecognizedrepresentativegovernment

wasformed.”101TheICGwascreatedonJuly13,2006despiteprotestsfromthe

sevenmajoroppositiongroups,andtheresultwasa25-membercouncil,fiveof

whomwereKurds.102TheIGCwasgrantedmoreauthoritythaninitiallydiscussed,

andonNovember15,2003,thecouncilannounceditsintentiontoacceleratethe

powertransfertoatransitionalgovernment.103

100Yildiz,TheKurdsinIraq:ThePast,PresentandFuture,117.101Ibid.102Yildiz,TheKurdsinIraq:ThePast,PresentandFuture,118.103Yildiz,TheKurdsinIraq:ThePast,PresentandFuture,119.

Page 23: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

23

TheTransitionalAdministrativeLaw(TAL)wentintoeffectMarch8,2004as

aninterimconstitutionforafederal,democraticIraqistate104withthespecificgoals

of:restoringsovereigntytoIraqbyJuly1,2004,electinganIraq-wideassemblyby

January31,2005,anddraftingapermanentconstitutionbyAugust15,2005,its

ratificationpending“theapprovaloftheIraqimajorityandiftwo-thirdsofthe

votersinthreeormoregovernoratesdonotrejectit.”105TheTALacknowledgedthe

heterogeneousnatureofIraqisocietyandrecognizedthelegitimacyofArabs,Kurds,

Turkmen,Assyrians,andArmeniansasnationalitieswithintheIraqistate,even

thoughArabicandKurdisharetheonlytwoofficiallanguages.106The18

governoratesofSaddam’sregimewererecognizedasfederativeentities,and

Kurdistancontainedthreefullgovernorates,Dohuk,Erbil,andSuleimaniya,with

portionsofDiyalaandNineva.107Article56statedthefederalgovernmentwould

begindivvyingupresponsibilitiestolocal,governorate,andregional

administrations,grantingtheKurdistanregionmuchmorepowerthanitsawunder

Saddam’srule.ThelawalsoaddressedthestatusofKirkuk,oneofthedisputed

territoriesbetweentheKRGandBaghdad;Article58deferredresolutiononKirkuk

untilacensusdeterminedwhichindividualsremovedfromtheirhomesduring

Saddam’srulecouldreturnorbecompensated.

104Gunter,15.ThefulltextoftheTransitionalAdministrativeLawcanbefoundinAppendix2ofTheFutureofKurdistaninIraq,Ed.BrendanO'Leary,JohnMcGarry,andKhālidSālih.(Philadelphia:UofPennsylvania,2005)315-340.105BrendanO’Leary,“Power-sharing,PluralistFederation,andFederacy,”TheFutureofKurdistaninIraq.Ed.BrendanO'Leary,JohnMcGarry,andKhālidSālih,(Philadelphia:UofPennsylvania,2005)48.106O’Leary,49.107O’Leary,67.

Page 24: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

24

TheTALmarkedthefirsttimetheKurdsweretrulyinvolvedinthedecision

makingprocessesinBaghdad,andthe2005Constitutionwasthelogicalnextstep

forinclusivity.The2005Constitutionwasdraftedbya55-personcommittee(28

Shi’acoalition,15Kurdishlist,eightIyadAlawi’sal-Iraqialist,oneChristian,one

Turkman,oneCommunist,andoneSunni,although14otherswereeventually

addedafterpressurefromtheSunnicommunity)asadecentralized,federal

constitution,andwasratifiedbya78.59%majorityonOctober15,2005.108The

2005ConstitutionwasabigwinfortheKRGsinceitrecognizedtheKurdsasan

Iraqiethnicgroup,acknowledgedKurdishautonomy,delineatedaplanfora

decentralizedIraq,andincludedprovisionsregardingthedisputedterritories,

primarilyKirkuk.109Article140addressedthequestionofthedisputedterritories

bypromisingacensus,normalization,andreferendumtodeterminethefinalstatus

byDecember31,2007.

Twomonthslater,thefirstgeneralelectionwasheldonDecember15,2005

inordertoelectthe275newmembersoftheIraqiNationalAssembly;ofthe275

seats,230weredividedbetweenthe18governoratesbasedonregisterednumbers

(including59forBaghdad),45compensatoryseatswerereservedforsmaller

politicalparties,while25%ofthetotalseatswereallottedtowomen.110Areported

79.6%,or11.9million,registeredvotersparticipatedintheelectionsatan

108SaadN.Jawad,“TheIraqiConstitution:StructuralFlawsandPoliticalImplications,”LSEMiddleEastCentrePaperSeries1(November2013)10.109DavidRomano,“IraqiKurdistan:ChallengesofAutonomyintheWakeofUSWithdrawal,”InternationalAffairs86.6(2010)1349-1350.110Yildiz,“TheKurdsinIraq”,39-40.

Page 25: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

25

estimated31,000pollingstations.111The2005generalelectionresultedin54seats

fortheKurdishalliance112andthedesignationofNourial-Maliki,deputyleaderof

theDawaparty,asPrimeMinister;al-Maliki’s37membercabinetwasapproved

May20,2006andincludedmembersofallmajorpolitical,religious,andethnic

groups.113Overthecourseofal-Maliki’sfirstgovernment,hefocusedonthree

things:buildingarelationshipwiththeU.S.anditsallies,containinginsurgency

movements,andimplementingthe2005constitution.114

AsthecentralIraqigovernmentmovedoutofitsinfancy,theKRG

experienceddevelopmentsofitsown.ThePUKandKDPreconfirmedtheir

commitmenttoreunifyJanuary7,2006,inordertobringallthreeprovincesunder

oneadministration.115Theaccordestablishedtermsforpowersharingbetweenthe

PUKandKDPwhiledisenfranchisingsmallerparties.116Newpositionswithinthe

KRGwerecreatedforthePUK,oneforvicepresidentandanotherfordeputyprime

minister,andtheministriesoftheinterior,finance,peshmerga,andjusticewere

reunited.117

TheKurdsexperiencedlesspromisingdevelopmentsfrom2007to2010.

2007broughtanincreaseininsurgencymovements,althoughtheyweregenerally

relegatedtothesouthandwerenotaswidespreadintheKurdishregiondueto

cohesiveeffortsbetweenciviliansandsecurityforcesandahard-lineapproachby

111Yildiz,“TheKurdsinIraq”,40112TheKRGparticipatedinthe2005electionononelistandmixedthecabinet.113Yildiz,“TheKurdsinIraq”,41.114Yildiz,“TheKurdsinIraq”,45.115Ahmed,12.116Ahmed,Ibid.117Ahmed,14.

Page 26: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

26

theKRG.118InAugust,thefiveremainingpartiesoftheal-Malikigovernmentformed

theModeratesFronts,anallianceholding130seatsandessentiallycreatinga

monopolyoftheparliament.119TheKurds’primarycauseforconcernof2007was

thefailuretoaddressthestatusofKirkuk;December31,2007cameandwent

withoutthepromisedcensus.

ThesituationinKurdistandeterioratedthroughout2008andinto2009.In

2008,al-Malikibeganconsolidatingpower,creatingtensionswithotherpartieswho

foundhismethodseerilysimilartothoseofSaddamandtheBa’athparty.The

January31,2009elections,heldunderanopenlistsystem,showedtheincreasein

interestinIraqiArabnationalistparties;al-Maliki’sStateofLawpartytriumphed

whiletheIslamicSupremeCouncilofIraqParty(ISCI)wasdefeated.120Thethree

KurdishgovernoratesandKirkukdidnotparticipateintheseelections,whichmay

havecontributedtothesuccessesofal-Malikiandhisparty.TheKRGexpressed

frustrationoveranumberofal-Maliki’smovesincludingtherecruitmentand

armingof“supportcouncils”inKurdishareas,thedeploymentofIraqitroopsto

disputedareas,thepassingofdeadlinesregardingdisputedterritories,andthe

questionofpowersharing.121

118Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:TheIraqiDilemma,55.Insurgencygroupsinclude:Ba’athists,IraqiNationalists,IraqiIslamists(primarilyMuslimBrotherhoodorSalafimovements),Shi’iteinsurgents,foreigngroups(e.g.Al-Qaeda),theIslamicStateofIraq,PartisansoftheSunnahArmy,theIslamicArmyinIraq;theIslamicFrontoftheIraqiResistance,theFirstFourCaliphsArmy,Mujahidin’sArmy,andMuhammad’sArmy.119Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:TheIraqiDilemma,43.120Romano,“TheStruggleforAutonomyandDecentralization–IraqiKurdistan,”58-59.121Romano,“TheStruggleforAutonomyandDecentralization–IraqiKurdistan,”60.

Page 27: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

27

Unfortunately,al-Maliki’sgovernmentwasnottheonlyproblemforthe

Kurds.AnoffshootofthePUKformedduetointernalstrife,andonApril16,2009

NawshirwanMustafaannouncedtheestablishmentofGorran(ChangeMovement),

althoughitwasnotformallyrecognizedasapoliticalorganizationuntilMay1,2010.

GorrancriticizedthefailuresoftheKRGtobringaboutsignificantchangeinregards

tothestatusofKirkukandtheguaranteesofKurdishrights.Gorrancapturedthe

interestofvotersunhappywiththeKDPandPUK,andinthe2009elections,the

newpartytook25ofthe111seatsintheKurdistanRegionalParliament.122

TheKurdsdidnotfaremuchbetterin2010and2011.TheMarch7,2010

parliamentaryelectionsreflectedthecontinuedsupportforIraqinationalism,with

theIraqiNationalMovementcominginfirstandtheStateofLawCoalitionsecond,

eventhoughtheKurdishAllianceswonthelargestnumberofseats.123Inorderto

formagovernment,al-MalikimadepromisestotheKurdsregardingoilrevenues

andthestatusofKirkukinexchangefortheirsupport.124Threemonthslater,the

KRGattemptedtoaddressitsinternaldivisionsbyhavingtheKDPandPUKsigna

secondagreementregardingtheircommitmenttothefutureofKurdistanandits

bestinterests.

However,inJanuaryof2011,Kurdistanwasagainembroiledininternal

conflict.AJanuary27,2011meetingbetweenTalabaniandBarzaniresultedinacall

fortheimprovementoflivingstandards;inresponse,Gorranrequestednew

122Ahmed,20.123Yildiz,TheFutureofKurdistan:TheIraqiDilemma,47.124MichaelM.Gunter,“TheKurdishSpring,”ThirdWorldQuarterly34.3(2013)445.

Page 28: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

28

elections,onethatwasrejectedbyTalabaniandBarzani.125TheeventsofJanuary

ledtodemonstrations,andonFebruary17,2011,3,000Kurdsgatheredin

Sulaimaniyatoprotestcorruption,nepotism,andthemonopolyofpoliticaland

economicpowerbytheKRG.126DespiteKRGattemptstocrackdownonprotestors,

demonstrationscontinued;asecondmajorprotestoccurredonFebruary24,2011

whentheself-proclaimed“PatrioticKurdishScholars”calledfortheeradicationof

KRGcorruption,unificationofpartymilitias,respectingfreedomsofexpressionand

women’srights,thecreationofjobs,thedeclarationofunilateralindependence,and

theclosingofTurkishandIranianoutposts.127Inanattempttoassuagediscontent,

theKRGproduceda17-point128plantoaddresstheissuesofdemonstratorsandby

March11,2011,themajorpartieshadreconciled.

Inadditiontointernaldiscord,theKRGfacedtheU.S.withdrawalandal-

Maliki’scontinuedattemptstoconsolidatehispowerinBaghdadin2011.Following

theU.S.withdrawal,al-Malikiincreasedhiscontroloverthecentralgovernment,a

processthathadbeenoccurringsince2008.Inadditiontofulfillingthepostof

PrimeMinister,al-MalikiactedasMinisterofDefense,MinisteroftheInterior,and

MinisterofStateforsupposednationalsecurityreasons.129Otheractsof

centralizationincluded:bureaucraticcleansingofKurdsandSunnipoliticians,130as

125Ahmed,27.126Ahmed,31.127Ahmed,34.128ThedetailsoftheKRG’s17-pointplancanbefoundonAhmed,31-34.129BurakBilgehanOzpek,“DemocracyorPartition:FutureScenariosfortheKurdsofIraq,”InsightTurkey14.3(2012)134.130Ibid.

Page 29: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

29

wellasincreasingcontrolovertheintelligenceservice,thearmy,thepolice,

supremecourt,andthecentralbank.131

Socio-EconomicDevelopmentsandForeignInvolvement

Thesocio-economicdevelopmentsofIraqiKurdistanandforeign

involvementhavebeencloselylinkedsincetheestablishmentofthesemi-

autonomousregion.Manyoftheinternaldevelopmentswouldnothavebeen

possiblewithoutthebackingofforeignpowers.FinancialaidinIraqiKurdistan

evolvedintoprogramsfocusedonlong-termdevelopment,promotinggood

governance,andliberalizationbetween2003and2007.132Despitediminished

allocationstoKurdistanduetorelativestability,Kurdishnationalism,andgreater

needinthesouthernandcentralregionsofIraq,IraqiKurdistanexperienced

growthintheeconomicandsocialspheres.133Inadditiontothe17%allotment

(estimated13%aftertaxdeductions)ofIraq’stotalrevenues,134theKRGalsoenjoys

revenuesfrominternalgrowthandexternalfunding.

Throughouttheearly21stcentury,Kurdistanenjoyedthecreationofa

businessclass,thedevelopmentoffreemarketlaws,anincreaseinthetourism

industry,andthecreationofalargeinternationalmarketintheoilandnaturalgas

industry.Asaresultoftheincreasedrevenuesandtrafficintheregion,an

131WladimirvanWilgenburg,“BreakingfromBaghdad:KurdishAutonomyvs.Maliki’sManipulation,”WorldAffairs(November/December2012)51.132Natali,“TheSpoilsofPeaceinIraqiKurdistan,”1119.133Ibid.134Natali,TheKurdishQuasi-State:DevelopmentandDependencyinPost-GulfWarIraq,105.

Page 30: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

30

internationalairport135wasbuiltinErbiltoaccommodateinvestors;travelersare

abletoflyfromErbildomestically(Basra,Baghdad,Najaf,orSulaimaniya),or

internationallytohubsintheMiddleEastandEurope.Thefinancialaidprovidedby

NGOsandhumanitarianorganizationsbetween1991-2003createdthenew

businessclass,whoinvestedinland,whichinturn,wastransformedfromfarms

intotouristandrecreationcenters.136Theseprojectsincreasedconcernsofthose

focusedonenvironmentalprotectionorfoodproduction,astourismcenterstook

awayresourcesforboth,andtheKRGeventuallycreatedincentivesforfarmers

willingtoworktheirland.137

Inordertoboosttheeconomy,theKRGpassedfreemarketlawsandcreated

incentivesinordertoattractinvestmentfromforeignpowers.Turkish,PersianGulf,

European,andAmericancompaniespreferredthe10yeartaxexemptionsandfree

landgrantswiththerighttotransferprofitsinternationallyinKurdistan,rather

thanattemptingtonegotiatewithBaghdad.138Thetourismindustrydidwellin

Kurdistan;especiallyduringthesummermonths,theregionbegantocompetewith

LebanonandSyriaforcentralandsouthernIraqiandGulfstatetourists.139Foreign

companiesfromLebanonandtheGulftooknoticeoftheriseintourists,butused

foreignratherthanKurdishworkers,sincethelocalpopulationwasgenerallyless

skilled.140

135TheErbilairportwasnotusedasacivilairportuntil2003;thelandwaspreviouslyusedforanairfieldandamilitarybasefortheBa’athpartyuntil1991.136Ahmed,70.137Ahmed,80.138Ahmed,70.139Ahmed,83.140Ibid.

Page 31: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

31

TheoilandnaturalgasreservesinKurdistanarewithoutadoubtthe

greatestresourcetheIraqiKurdspossess.KRGterritorycomprisesanestimated8-

13%ofIraqioilreservesand17%ofIraqinaturalgasresourceswithanestimated

12billionbarrelsofoiland22trillioncubicfeedofnaturalgas.141In2004,following

thecollapseoftheBa’athregime,theKRGsigneditsfirstcontractwithDNO,and

productionbeganin2007.Frustratedbytherestrictionsofnationallaws,theKRG

passeditsownhydrocarbonlawin2007,allowingthemtheindependenceto

negotiatecontractswithinvestors.Asof2013,over41companiesareinvestedin

theoilandgasfieldsofKurdistan,allofwhichareownedbythePUKandKDP

respectively,ratherthantheKRG.142TheKRG’smostrecentprojecthasfocusedon

thenaturalgasresources,andrecentlyannounceda461millionsquarefootsitefor

theKurdistanGasCity,aswellas180kilometerpipelineprojectconnectingKhor

MorgasfieldtoSulaimaniyaandErbil.143Turkeyhasbeentheprimarybeneficiary

ofKurdishresources,buttheKRGhasrecentlynegotiatedproduction-sharing

contracts(PSCs)withAmerican,European,andSouthKoreancompanies,144

includingChevron,ExxonMobil,Total,andGazProm.145

Thesedevelopmentshavebeenoneofthesourcesofcontentionbetween

ErbilandBaghdadsince2003.Baghdadmaintainsithasthesolerighttonegotiate141YasarYakis,“TurkeyaftertheArabSpring:PolicyDilemmas,”MiddleEastPolicy21.1(2014)100-101.142HiraandJabary,106.143Ibid.144Natali,TheKurdishQuasiState:DevelopmentandDependencyinPost-GulfWarIraq,109.145BillPark,“Turkey’sMultipleKurdishDilemmas,”OrtadoğuEtütleri5.1(July2013):45-46.SeealsoMassimoMorelliandConstantinoPischedda,“TheTurkey-KRGEnergyPartnership:AssessingItsImplications,”MiddleEastPolicy21.1(2014)108-109.

Page 32: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

32

withforeignpowersovernaturalresources,astheseresourcesarecommon

property,butErbilcontinuestonegotiatecontracts;therehavebeenseveral

proposedagreementsregardingtheexportofoilbutallhavebeenmarredby

Baghdad’sdelayedpaymentsortheKRG’snon-compliancewiththeterms.146The

October2011ExxonMobilagreement,the2012oilandgaspipelineswithTurkey,

andthe2012NaboccogaspipelineagreementwiththeUAE’sDanaGashaveall

exacerbatedtensions.147

Kurdishprogresswasnotwithoutsetbacks,andtherewereseveralmajor

issuesthataroseduringthepost-Saddamperiod.Corruptionhasbecomeoneofthe

primarypointsofcontentionfacingtheKRG.Ina2012reportpublishedbythe

KurdishRegionalReformCommission(KRRC),theKRGwasfoundtobeincredibly

corruptbasedon“poorgoverningperformance,partisanloyalty(primarily

providingjobsbasedonneedratherthanqualifications),andweakagendas.”148

DespiteprotestsfromlocalKurdsandattemptstorectifythesituation,significant

progresshasnotbeenmade.

LocalKurdsalsocontributedtoroadblocksinsocio-economicdevelopment.

Eventhougheconomicgrowthledtoincreasedstandardsofliving,theattitudesof

thelocalpopulationdidnotenjoythesameevolution.Traditionalvaluesclashed

withthenewdevelopmentsintheregion.DespitetheKRG’spromotionofschool

constructionwithinKurdishlocalities,somecontinuedtoopposeeducation.149The

146MorelliandPischedda,109.147Ahmed,75andOzpek,134-135.148JabaryandHira,108.149Natali,TheKurdishQuasi-State:DevelopmentandDependencyinPost-GulfWarIraq,115.

Page 33: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

33

statusofwomenalsoexperiencedminimaldevelopmentduringthisperiod;high

ratesofteenagemarriage,polygamy,honorkillings,femalegenitalmutilation,and

divorceremainprevalent.150

CurrentDevelopments:2012-2015

Therearefewacademicsourcesregardingthepolitical,socio-economic,and

foreignpolicydevelopmentsinIraqinvolvingtheKurdsfrom2012-2015.Kurdish

politicalpartiescontinuetobattleforcontrolofBaghdadandwithintheKRGforthe

majorityofseatsinKurdishparliament.Barzaniextendedhispresidentialterman

additionaltwoyears,and2013parliamentaryelectionsresultedintheKDPholding

thelargestnumberofseats,followedbyGorranandthePUK.In2014thefocus

switchedfromindependencetofightingtheIslamicState;Barzani’sinitialcallfora

2014independencereferendumwasrevokedafteritwasdecidedtheIslamicState

wasamorepressingmatterthanKurdishindependence.Baghdadexperienceda

changeinpowerwhenHaideral-AbadiassumedtheroleofIraqiPrimeMinister,but

ErbilcontinuestorecognizeBarzaniaspresidentoftheKRGdespitepresidential

electionsbeingscheduledforAugust20,2015.

Analysis:LeverageorIndependence?

TheKurdshavedevelopedarelativelysuccessfulquasi-stateinnorthern

Iraq.Gunteraptlystatesthatwithapresident,primeminister,parliament,regional

elections,flag,nationalanthem,peshmerga,airport,Kurdisheducationsystem,and

passportstamps,Kurdistanhasthetrappingsofanindependentstate.151TheKRG

150Natali,TheKurdishQuasi-State:DevelopmentandDependencyinPost-GulfWarIraq,116.151Gunter,“TheKurdishState,”445.

Page 34: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

34

hasdevelopedforeigncontacts,sendingdiplomaticrepresentativesabroadand

housingforeignconsulatesinErbil,152andutilizedtheirnaturalresourcesto

jumpstarttheeconomy.However,thesepositivedevelopmentsarenotsufficientfor

KurdishsecessionfromcentralIraq.

TheKRGcontinuestorelyheavilyonBaghdadforanumberofresources.The

17%cutoftotalIraqirevenuesisnecessarytokeeptheregionafloat,particularlyif

theKRG’sclaimofthisamountbeinginsufficientforKurdishneedsisaccurate,as

wellasthedependenceonthecentralgovernmentforthesalariesofministersand

judgeslinkedtotheCourtofCassation.153KurdistanisalsotiedtocentralIraq

throughcommercialbusinessventuresandculture.BusinessmentraveltoBaghdad

tosigncontractsregardingfoodandconstructionimports,andatraderelationship

isstillactiveregardingoilandgas,householdgoods,food,andautomobiles.154

Linguisticallythetwoareasarebound,aspolitical,religious,business,and

occasionallypersonalinteractionstakeplaceinArabic.155

ThesupportofcentralIraqandinternationalpartnersisalsoaroadblockto

thepotentialsecessionofKurdistan.Inordertokeeptheeconomyafloat,the

investmentofforeigncompanieswouldbeavitalcomponentofanindependent

Kurdistan,butanindependentKurdishstatewouldnotsitwellwiththemajorityof

theregion’sneighborsandcurrentpartners.TheKRG’sneighborsintheMiddleEast

wouldvehementlyopposethesecession.Baghdadwantstomaintainitsterritorial152Ahmed,205.153Natali,TheKurdishQuasiState:DevelopmentandDependencyinPost-GulfWarIraq,119.154Natali,“TheSpoilsofPeaceinIraqiKurdistan”,1124.155Natali,155Natali,TheKurdishQuasiState:DevelopmentandDependencyinPost-GulfWarIraq,122-123.

Page 35: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

35

integrityandcontinuetoenjoythenaturalresourcesfromtheKurdishregion;

secessionwouldlikelyresultintheeliminationoffinancialaidtheKRGenjoysfrom

theIraqigovernment.Turkey’smajorqualmwithKurdishsecessionwouldbethe

threatofasimilaruprisingwithinitsownKurdishminority,andtheeconomyof

KurdistanfacespossiblecollapseifTurkeypulleditsfinancialinvestorsandcutoff

trade.

Conclusion

TheKurdsofIraqhavemadetremendousstridesintheirquestfor

recognitionandautonomysincetheemergenceofKurdishnationalismintheearly

20thcentury.AfteryearsofviolenceandpersecutionbytheBa’athregimeand

internaldiscordbetweenKurdishparties,the1990sand2000ssawthe

establishmentofasemi-autonomousregionthathasenjoyedincreasinginfluencein

BaghdadandtheMiddleEast.TheKRG’sdecisiontotableindependencediscussions

inlightofthecurrentIslamicStatecrisisisthebestmovefortheregion.Iraqi

Kurdistanfaredwellinthe2005IraqiConstitutionandbenefitsfromitssemi-

autonomousstatuswithoutthepressuresfacinganindependentstate.TheKRGis

abletousethethreatofsecessionasabargainingchipwithBaghdad,and

independencewouldleaveErbilwithoutmuchleverage.Fortheforeseeablefuture,

IraqiKurdistanshouldremainasemi-autonomousregioninnorthernIraqand

continuetodeveloppolitically,economically,andsocially.

Page 36: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

36

AppendicesAppendixA156

156Yildiz,TheKurdsinIraq:ThePast,PresentandFuture,xi.

Page 37: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

37

AppendixB157

157Ahmed,xix.

Page 38: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

38

BibliographyAhmed,MohammedM.A.IraqiKurdsandNation-building.NewYork:Palgrave

Macmillan,2012.Web.

Albert,CraigDouglas.“AHistoryofViolence:EthnicGroupIdentityandtheIraqi

Kurds.”IranandtheCaucasus17(2013):215-234.

Aziz,MahirA.TheKurdsofIraq:EthnonationalismandNationalIdentityinIraq

Kurdistan.London:I.B.Tauris,2011.

Bangura,AbdulKarimandAliciaM.Micozzi.“ConstructingaNationalIdentityin

Post-SaddamHusseinIraq:TheCaseofIraq’sKurdishCommunity.”

InternationalJournalofDiversity3(2012):62-72.

Bell,Kelly.“WorldWarII:AirWaroverIraq.”AviationHistoryMagazine.(May

2004).Online.Internet.December13,2015.Available:

http://www.historynet.com/world-war-ii-air-war-over-iraq.htm.

Benard,AlexanderandJ.P.Schnapper-Casteras.“NorthernExposure:Kurdistanafter

theWithdrawal.”WorldAffairs(July/August2010):83-89.

Fantappie,Maria.“ArmedForcesBasedinIraqiKurdistan:ALenstoUnderstandthe

Post-SaddamEra.”FromDesolationtoReconstruction:Iraq’sTroubled

Journey.Ed.MokhtarLamaniandBessmaMomani.Waterloo,Ontario:Wilfrid

LaurierUniversityPress,2009.75-94.

Franzen,Johan.“TheProblemofIraqiNationalism.”NationalIdentities13.3(2011):

217-234.

Ghareeb,Edmund.TheKurdishQuestioninIraq.Syracuse,NY:SyracuseUP,1981.

Ghareeb,Edmund.“TheKurdishIssue.”Iraq:ItsHistory,People,andPolitics.Ed.ShamiConstantineInati.Amherst,NY:Humanity,2003.

Page 39: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

39

Gunter,MichaelM.“TheKurdishSpring.”ThirdWorldQuarterly34.3(2013):441-

457.

Gunter,MichaelM.TheKurdsAscending:TheEvolvingSolutiontotheKurdish

ProbleminIraqandTurkey.NewYork,NY:PalgraveMacmillan,2007.

Gunter,MichaelM.TheKurdsofIraq:TragedyandHope.NewYork:St.Martin's,

1992.

Hira,AnilandKawaJabary.“TheKurdishMirage:ASuccessStoryinDoubt.”Middle

EastPolicy20.2(2013):99-112.

Jawad,SaadN.“TheIraqiConstitution:StructuralFlawsandPoliticalImplications,”

LSEMiddleEastCentrePaperSeries1.November2013.

Jimenez,JeremyandPeterKabachnik.“TheOtherIraq:ExploringIraqiKurdistan.”

FOCUSonGeography55.2(Summer2012):31-40.

Lamani,Mokhtar.“TheExtinctionofIraqiMinorities:ChallengeorCatastrophe?”

FromDesolationtoReconstruction:Iraq’sTroubledJourney.Ed.Mokhtar

LamaniandBessmaMomani.Waterloo,Ontario:WilfridLaurierUniversity

Press,2009.95-113.

Lawrence,Quil.InvisibleNation:HowtheKurds'QuestforStatehoodIsShapingIraq

andtheMiddleEast.NewYork:Walker,2008.Print.

Logan,DarrenL.“ThoughtsonIraqiKurdistan:PresentRealities,FutureHope.”Iran

andtheCaucasus13(2009):161-186.

Mansfield,Stephen.TheMiracleoftheKurds:ARemarkableStoryofHopeRebornin

NorthernIraq.Tennessee:WorthyPublishing,2014.

Page 40: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

40

McDowall,David.AModernHistoryoftheKurds.London:I.B.Tauris,1996.

Morelli,MassimoandConstantinoPischedda.“TheTurkey-KRGEnergy

Partnership:AssessingItsImplications.”MiddleEastPolicy21.1(2014):107-

121.

Natali,Denise.TheKurdishQuasi-state:DevelopmentandDependencyinPost-Gulf

WarIraq.Syracuse,NY:SyracuseUP,2010.

Natali,Denise.TheKurdsandtheState:EvolvingNationalIdentityinIraq,Turkey,

andIran.Syracuse,NY:SyracuseUP,2005.

Natali,Denise.“TheSpoilsofPeaceinIraqiKurdistan.”ThirdWorldQuarterly28.6

(2007):1111-1129.

O'Leary,Brendan,JohnMcGarry,andKhālidSālih.TheFutureofKurdistaninIraq.

Philadelphia:UofPennsylvania,2005.

Ozpek,BurakBilgehan.“DemocracyorPartition:FutureScenariosfortheKurdsof

Iraq.”InsightTurkey14.3(2012):127-140.

Park,Bill.“Turkey’sMultipleKurdishDilemmas.”OrtadoğuEtütleri5.1(July2013):

41-63.

Romano,David.“IraqiKurdistan:ChallengesofAutonomyintheWakeofUS

Withdrawal.”InternationalAffairs86.6(2010):1345-1359.

Romano,David.“TheStruggleforAutonomyandDecentralization-IraqiKurdistan.”

FromDesolationtoReconstruction:Iraq’sTroubledJourney.Ed.Mokhtar

LamaniandBessmaMomani.Waterloo,Ontario:WilfridLaurierUniversity

Press,2009.53-73.

Page 41: Kurdish Nationalism in Northern Iraq_Ravenel Godbold

41

Sluglett,Peter.“CommonSense,oraStepPregnantwithEnormousConsequences:

SomeThoughtsonthePossibleSecessionofIraqiKurdistan.”Secessionasan

InternationalPhenomenon:FromAmerica’sCivilWartoContemporary

SeparatistMovements.Ed.DonHarrisonDoyle.Athens:UniversityofGeorgia

Press,2010.319-337.

Talabani,Nouri.“EthnicCleansinginIraqiKurdistan.”KurdishIdentity:Human

RightsandPoliticalStatus.Ed.CharlesG.MacDonaldandCaroleO’Leary.

Gainesville:UniversityPressofFlorida,2007.145-148.

VanWilgenburg,Wladimir.“BreakingfromBaghdad:KurdishAutonomyvs.Maliki’s

Manipulation.”WorldAffairs(November/December2012):47-53.

Yakis,Yasar.“TurkeyaftertheArabSpring:PolicyDilemmas.”MiddleEastPolicy

21.1(2014):98-106.

Yildiz,Kerim.TheFutureofKurdistan:TheIraqiDilemma.London:PlutoPress,2012

Yildiz,Kerim.TheKurdsinIraq:ThePast,PresentandFuture.London:PlutoPress,

2004.