land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

15
The IEA Bioenergy Technology Collaboration Programme (TCP) is organised under the auspices of the International Energy Agency (IEA) but is functionally and legally autonomous. Views, findings and publications of the IEA Bioenergy TCP do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or its individual member countries. Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs Floor van der Hilst, Utrecht University Co-Chair IEA Bioenergy T45, WP2 lead IEA Bioenergy Conference 30 November 2021

Upload: others

Post on 17-Apr-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

The IEA Bioenergy Technology Collaboration Programme (TCP) is organised under the auspices of the International Energy Agency (IEA) but is functionally and legally autonomous.

Views, findings and publications of the IEA Bioenergy TCP do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or its individual member countries.

Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

Floor van der Hilst, Utrecht University

Co-Chair IEA Bioenergy T45, WP2 lead

IEA Bioenergy Conference 30 November 2021

Page 2: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

www.ieabioenergy.com2

Ivan Vera, Birka Wicke, Patrick Lamers, Annette Cowie, Anna Repo, Bas Heukels, Colleen Zumpf, David Styles, Esther Parish, Francesco Cherubini, Göran Berndes, Henriette Jager, Luis Schiesari, Martin Junginger, Miguel Brandão, Niclas Scott Bentsen, Vassilis Daioglou, Zoe Harris and Floor van der Hilst

Joint effort

Page 3: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

www.ieabioenergy.com3

The Role of bioenergy

• We need deep GHG emission

reduction and negative emissions

• Bioenergy is required to meet

these objectives

IPCC, 2018

Page 4: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

www.ieabioenergy.com4

• Many sustainability concerns of

bioenergy

• Main concerns are related to the use

of land for dedicated energy crops

• Land plays a critical role in meeting

various SDGs

• Bioenergy part of the problem or the

solution?

• Synergies and Trade-offs

• Context specific

Sustainability concerns

Page 5: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

www.ieabioenergy.com5

Aim

LAND USE FOR

DEDICATED

ENERGY CROPS13CLIMATE

ACTION

Overview synergies and trade-offs

between impacts of land use for

dedicated energy crop production on

SDGs and identify the context specific

factors that affect these outcomes.

- GHG emission reduction focus

- Only dedicated energy crops

Page 6: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

www.ieabioenergy.com6

• 427 observations

• 170 synergies

• 176 trade-offs

• 81 no effect

Important:

Numbers do not represent

intensity of the relation

Synergies and trade-offs

Page 7: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

www.ieabioenergy.com7

Soil quality

Biodiversity

Forest conservation

Synergies and trade-offs

cWater availability

Water quality

cAlbedo

Adaptation

Page 8: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

www.ieabioenergy.com8

Farmers’ income

Job creation

Synergies and trade-offs

cRecreation

Esthetics

cCompetition for land

Page 9: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

www.ieabioenergy.com9

• Context specific factors determine whether a synergy or a trade-off occurs

• Previous land use

• Feedstock type

• Biophysical conditions (soil type and climate)

• Most information available for environment-related SDGs

• Life on land

• Clean water and sanitation

• Climate action

Context-specific conditions

Page 10: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

www.ieabioenergy.com10

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Not specified

Land already in use

Mix

Forest

Natural and semi natural areas

Arable

Pasture

Marginal lands

Trade-offs Synergies

Water quality - 6.3

Water use and efficiency - 6.4

Strengthen resilience to climate-related hazards and natural disasters - 13.1

Prevent and significantly reduce marine pollution - 14.1

Biodiversity conservation - 15.1

Sustainable forest management/halt deforestation - 15.2

Soil quality - 15.3

Previous land use

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Not specified

Land already in use

Mix

Forest

Natural and semi natural areas

Arable

Pasture

Marginal lands

Trade-offs Synergies

Water quality - 6.3

Water use and efficiency - 6.4

Strengthen resilience to climate-related hazards and natural disasters - 13.1

Prevent and significantly reduce marine pollution - 14.1

Biodiversity conservation - 15.1

Sustainable forest management/halt deforestation - 15.2

Soil quality - 15.3

Page 11: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

www.ieabioenergy.com11

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Sugarcrops

Oil palm

Annual crops

SRC

Perennial grasses

Forestry

Perennials Mix

Crops mix

Trade-offs Synergies

Water quality - 6.3

Water use and efficiency - 6.4

Strengthen resilience to climate-related hazards and natural disasters - 13.1

Prevent and significantly reduce marine pollution - 14.1

Biodiversity conservation - 15.1

Sustainable forest management/halt deforestation - 15.2

Soil quality - 15.3

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Sugarcrops

Oil palm

Annual crops

SRC

Perennial grasses

Forestry

Perennials Mix

Crops mix

Trade-offs Synergies

Water quality - 6.3

Water use and efficiency - 6.4

Strengthen resilience to climate-related hazards and natural disasters - 13.1

Prevent and significantly reduce marine pollution - 14.1

Biodiversity conservation - 15.1

Sustainable forest management/halt deforestation - 15.2

Soil quality - 15.3

Feedstock type

Page 12: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

www.ieabioenergy.com12

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80

Cool temperate moist

Cool temperate dry

Tropical moist

Tropical wet

Warm temperate dry

Warm temperate moist

Scale

Trade-offs Synergies

Water quality - 6.3

Water use and efficiency - 6.4

Strengthen resilience to climate-related hazards and natural disasters - 13.1

Prevent and significantly reduce marine pollution - 14.1

Biodiversity conservation - 15.1

Sustainable forest management/halt deforestation - 15.2

Soil quality - 15.3

Climate region

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Sugarcrops

Oil palm

Annual crops

SRC

Perennial grasses

Forestry

Perennials Mix

Crops mix

Trade-offs Synergies

Water quality - 6.3

Water use and efficiency - 6.4

Strengthen resilience to climate-related hazards and natural disasters - 13.1

Prevent and significantly reduce marine pollution - 14.1

Biodiversity conservation - 15.1

Sustainable forest management/halt deforestation - 15.2

Soil quality - 15.3

Page 13: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

www.ieabioenergy.com13

• Almost an equal number of synergies and trade-offs were found, but:

• Most synergies were found for:• perennial crops

• on marginal land

• cool temperate moist climate

• high activity clay soils

• Most trade-offs were found for:

• When natural areas are used for dedicated energy crops; disregarding feed stock, climate, soil

condition

• Synergies were mostly found for Mostly trade offs found for

• To maximize synergies and avoid trade-offs It is key to consider contextual conditions.

Discussion and conclusion

Page 14: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

www.ieabioenergy.com14

• The geographical level of assessment and the scale highly effect the outcomes

• Land use is an interplay of all land use functions

• Time dimension

• Next step: quantify synergies and trade-offs under context specific conditions

• Allows for informed decision making

Next steps

Page 15: Land use for bioenergy: synergies and trade-offs

www.ieabioenergy.com

[email protected]